Civics Education Initiative Enacted (As of July 2017) Current Civics Requirement Equal to Or Greater Than CEI

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Civics Education Initiative Enacted (As of July 2017) Current Civics Requirement Equal to Or Greater Than CEI The Civics Proficiency Initiative will set as a requirement for High School graduation that students must pass the United States Citizenship Civics Test. Passage of this test – in English – is required for all new American Citizens. A score of 60% or greater is required for passage. As of December 2013, 92% of immigrants applying for United States citizenship passed the test. For native-born citizens the results are less than stellar. According to the 2014 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAPE), only 23 percent of 8th graders are proficient in civics, and only 14 percent of High School Seniors can identify Thomas Jefferson as the author of the Declaration of Independence. Shouldn’t our High School graduates know as much about basic American civics as we require immigrants applying for United States citizenship to know about America? Can you pass the test? T k th t t b l d h ll k b i A i i i United States Citizenship Civics Test 100 Questions in Three Parts PART ONE: AMERICAN GOVERNMENT 18. How many U.S. Senators are there? 19. We elect a U.S. Senator for how many years? A: Principles of American Democracy 20. Who is one of your state's U.S. Senators now? 21. The House of Representatives has how many 1. What is the supreme law of the land? voting members? 2. What does the Constitution do? 22. We elect a U.S. Representative for how many 3. The idea of self-government is in the first three years? words of the Constitution. What are these 23. Name your U.S. Representative. words? 24. Who does a U.S. Senator represent? 4. What is an amendment? 25. Why do some states have more 5. What do we call the first ten amendments to Representatives than other states? the Constitution 26. We elect a President for how many years? 6. What is one right or freedom from the First 27. In what month do we vote for President? Amendment? 28. What is the name of the President of the United 7. How many amendments does the Constitution States now? have? 29. What is the name of the Vice President of the 8. What did the Declaration of Independence do? United States now? 9. What are two rights in the Declaration of 30. If the President can no longer serve, who Independence? becomes President? 10. What is freedom of religion? 31. If both the President and the Vice President can 11. What is the economic system in the United no longer serve, who becomes President? States? 32. Who is the Commander in Chief of the military? 12. What is the "rule of law"? 33. Who signs bills to become laws? 34. Who vetoes bills? B: System of Government 35. What does the President's Cabinet do? 36. What are two Cabinet: level positions? 13. Name one branch or part of the government. 37. What does the judicial branch do? 14. What stops one branch of government from 38. What is the highest court in the United States? becoming too powerful 39. How many justices are on the Supreme Court? 15. Who is in charge of the executive branch? 40. Who is the Chief Justice of the United States 16. Who makes federal laws? now? 17. What are the two parts of the U.S. Congress? 41. Under our Constitution, some powers belong to the federal government. What is one power of France in 1803? the federal government? 72. Name one war fought by the United States in 42. Under our Constitution, some powers belong to the 1800s. the states. What is one power of the states? 73. Name the U.S. war between the North and the 43. Who is the Governor of your state now? South. 44. What is the capital of your state? 74. Name one problem that led to the Civil War. 45. What are the two major political parties in the 75. What was one important thing that Abraham United States? Lincoln did? 46. What is the political party of the President 76. What did the Emancipation Proclamation do? now? 77. What did Susan B. Anthony do? 47. What is the name of the Speaker of the House of Representatives now? C: Recent American History and Other Important Historical Information C: Rights and Responsibilities 78. Name one war fought by the United States in 48. There are four amendments to the Constitution the 1900s. about who can vote. Describe one of them. 79. Who was President during World War I? 49. What is one responsibility that is only for 80. Who was President during the Great United States citizens? Depression and World War II? 50. Name one right only for United States citizens. 81. Who did the United States fight in World War 51. What are two rights of everyone living in the II? United States? 82. Before he was President, Eisenhower was a 52. What do we show loyalty to when we say the general. What war was he in? Pledge of Allegiance? 83. During the Cold War, what was the main 53. What is one promise you make when you concern of the United States? become a United States citizen? 84. What movement tried to end racial 54. How old do citizens have to be to vote for discrimination? President? 85. What did Martin Luther King, Jr. do? 55. What are two ways that Americans can 86. What major event happened on September 11, participate in their democracy? 2001, in the United States? 56. When is the last day you can send in federal 87. Name one American Indian tribe in the United income tax forms? States. 57. When must all men register for the Selective Service? PART THREE: INTEGRATED CIVICS PART TWO: AMERICAN HISTORY A: Geography A: Colonial Period and Independence 88. Name one of the two longest rivers in the United States. 58. What is one reason colonists came to America? 89. What ocean is on the West Coast of the United 59. Who lived in America before the Europeans States? arrived? 90. What ocean is on the East Coast of the United 60. What group of people was taken to America States? and sold as slaves? 91. Name one U.S. territory. 61. Why did the colonists fight the British? 92. Name one state that borders Canada. 62. Who wrote the Declaration of Independence? 93. Name one state that borders Mexico. 63. When was the Declaration of Independence 94. What is the capital of the United States? adopted? 95. Where is the Statue of Liberty? 64. There were 13 original states. Name three. 65. What happened at the Constitutional B: Symbols Convention? 66. When was the Constitution written? 96. Why does the flag have 13 stripes? 67. The Federalist Papers supported the passage of 97. Why does the flag have 50 stars? the U.S. Constitution. Name one of the writers. 98. What is the name of the national anthem? 68. What is one thing Benjamin Franklin is famous for? C: Holidays 69. Who is the "Father of Our Country?” 70. Who was the first President? 99. When do we celebrate Independence Day? 100. Name two national U.S. holidays. B. The 1800’s 71. What territory did the United States buy from Civics Education Initiative Enacted (as of July 2017) Current civics requirement equal to or greater than CEI Proposed States for 2017/18 JoeFossInstitute.org CivicsEducationInitiative.com LegisBrief A QUICK LOOK INTO IMPORTANT ISSUES OF THE DAY MAR 2017 | VOL. 25, NO. 9 Tackling the American Civics Education Crisis BY MEGAN MCCLURE Those looking to remedy the situation are not starved for organizations willing to help. There are Millions of American students and adults are myriad groups providing legislative guidance, talk- unfamiliar with how their government works, ing points, teacher lesson plans, and resources and Resources leading experts to sound the alarm about a crisis in programs for students. NCSL Legislators Back civics education. Armed with evidence of the lack to School program of knowledge, the Civics Education Initiative and The Civics Education Initiative Civics Education other programs aim to reverse a trend they say One such organization is the Joe Foss Institute, Initiative leaves American democracy vulnerable. which realized that “students are not learning how Less than 30 percent of fourth-, eighth- and 12th- to run our country, how government is meant to iCivics operate as outlined in the Constitution and Bill of Civics Renewal Rights, and more importantly, the history behind Network groups,grade students according were to theproficient 2010 National in civics, Assess and a - how our country came to be—the philosophy Center for Civic mentsignificant of Educational gap persists Progress among (NAEP) racial and civics ethnic report . behind America’s values.” This realization Education NAEP also reports a decline in the overall civic prompted the Institute to create the Civics knowledge of high school seniors between 2006 Education Initiative. and 2010. In addition, a survey of 1,416 adults by The goal of the CEI is to make passing the U.S. the Annenberg Public Policy Center (APPC) re- citizenship test a requirement for high school vealed that only one-third of those surveyed could graduation. The reasoning behind the Initiative is Sample questions simple: Civics education is necessary to produce of respondents think that a 5-4 Supreme Court well-informed, understanding citizens, committed from the U.S. name the three branches of government. One-fifth ruling is sent back to Congress for consideration. to participating in the American system. The ini- citizenship test The results of this survey “demonstrate that many tiative recommends teaching and testing students How many know surprisingly little about these branches of on American civics.
Recommended publications
  • Center for Strategic and International Studies Bob Schieffer's
    Center for Strategic and International Studies Bob Schieffer’s “About the News” with H. Andrew Schwartz Podcast Subject: “Ruth Marcus: A Matter of Opinion” Speakers: Ruth Marcus, Columnist, The Washington Post Hosts: H. Andrew Schwartz, Senior Vice President for External Relations, CSIS Bob Schieffer, CBS Political News Contributor; Former Host, “Face the Nation,” CBS News Date: Monday, July 24, 2017 Transcript By Superior Transcriptions LLC www.superiortranscriptions.com (Music plays.) BOB SCHIEFFER: I’m Bob Schieffer. H. ANDREW SCHWARTZ: And I’m Andrew Schwartz. MR. SCHIEFFER: And these are conversations about the news. We’re in the midst of a communications revolution. We have access to more information than any people in history. But are we more informed, or just overwhelmed by so much information we can’t process it? MR. SCHWARTZ: Our podcast is a collaboration of the Bob Schieffer College of Communication at TCU and the CSIS in Washington. MR. SCHIEFFER: In this first year of Donald Trump’s presidency, we’re talking to the reporters who are covering the president the closest. (Music plays.) MR. SCHIEFFER: Today on the podcast we have Ruth Marcus, an op-ed columnist for The Washington Post, who specializes in American politics and domestic policy. She’s also the deputy editorial page editor. She went to Yale and then went to Harvard Law School. And if I’m correct, you started writing for the Post while you were in law school. And then did you ever leave, or is that the only place you’ve ever worked? RUTH MARCUS: That’s – well, I worked for a small legal newspaper before I went into law school, which kind of explains my detour.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. Names and Addressess of Journalists And
    Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England 59 Crescent St., Brooklyn, NY 11208 M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School [email protected] D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris tel. (718) 827-9521 (as of July 24, 2009) Names and Addressess of Journalists and Media Outlets Table of Contents THE WASHINGTON POST................................................................................................................................ 1 LIST OF EDITORIAL WRITERS .................................................................................................................................... 7 THE NEW YORK TIMES ................................................................................................................................... 7 POLITICO ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 MCCLATCHY ................................................................................................................................................... 11 MCCLATCHY STAFF WITHOUT NAMES ..................................................................................................................... 13 RUSH LIMBAUGH ........................................................................................................................................... 13 THE NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks
    September 2.4, 1981 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 21975 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS CONGRESSIONAL BLACK This is an award that I deeply appre­ Farmers have traditionally paid back ASSOCIATES ciate, and one in which I take great their commodity support loans, and pride. It also will be a constant re­ when they have not, the Government HON. PETER W. RODINO, JR. minder that I share with this group a has been able to sell the commodities OF NEW JERSEY continuing responsibility to go on that it obtains as a result of the terms IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES working to correct injustices and im­ of the loans at a profit. Under the loan prove the quality of life for all Ameri­ program that was in effect for the Thursday, September 24, 1981 cans. It is an award I will long treas­ early years of the Carter administra­ e Mr. RODINO. Mr. Speaker, I wish ure. tion, . the Government actually made to express for the record my support more than $67 million on the loan pro­ for and appreciation of the contribu­ PERSONAL EXPLANATION gram. tions to the Congress and the commu­ Mr. Speaker, today's Wall Street nity of the Congressional Black Asso­ Journal published a story titled ciates. HON. HAL DAUB "Sugar Growers See Losses as Prices This organization of black employ­ OF NEBRASKA Hit 2-Year Lows on Expected Bumper ees on Capitol Hill was founded 1 year IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Crops." This story very clearly demon­ ago. Its mission, in its own words, is to enhance "the political, social, and eco­ Thursday, September 24, 1981 strates the problems that our sugar • Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Without War a Post-Cold War Foreign Policy
    SECURITY WITHOUT WAR A POST-COLD WAR FOREIGN POLICY Michael H. Shuman and Hal Harvey With a Foreward by Senator Paul Simon Westview Press Boulder • San Francisco • Oxford You will say at once that although the abolition of war has been the dream of man for centuries, every proposition to that end has been promptly discarded as impossible and fantastic. Every cynic, every pessimist, every adventurer, every swashbuckler in the world has always disclaimed its feasibility....But now the tremendous and present evolution of nuclear and other potentials of destruction has suddenly taken the problem away from its primary consideration as a moral and spiritual question and brought it abreast of scientific realism. It is no longer an ethical equation to be pondered solely by learned philosophers and ecclesiastics but a hard core one for the decision of the masses whose survival is the issue. – General Douglas MacArthur, 1955 CONTENTS Foreward, Senator Paul Simon Acknowledgments Introduction (n/a) Cold War Policies in a Post-Cold-War World Toward a New View of Security Organization of the Book Part I. Redefining Security 1. New Security Threats Military Threats Political Threats Economic Threats Environmental Threats A Comprehensive Policy 2. Limits to Force The Folly of U.S. Intervention The Recent Record for Other Users of Force Force as a Last Resort 3. Dangers of Arms Racing The Controlled Arms Race The War Risks of the Controlled Arms Race Political Insecurity Economic Security Environmental Security Security Without Arms Races Part II. Preventing and Resolving Conflicts 4. Political Roots of Conflict Strong Democracy and Interstate Peace Strong Democracy and Intrastate Peace Promoting Strong Democracy Abroad Promoting Strong Democracy at Home Perpetual Peace 5.
    [Show full text]
  • What If Before the War, Everyone Came? Goldwater-Nichols, Contradicting Policies, Political Appointees, and Misalignment in American Foreign Policy
    SEPTEMBER 2015 What if before the war, everyone came? Goldwater-Nichols, contradicting policies, political appointees, and misalignment in American foreign policy ROBERT N. HEIN Federal Executive Fellow ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank dozens of people for their help in explaining the finer points of for- eign policy throughout my year at Brookings. Some have really stood out. I would like to thank former ambassadors Dick Jones, Steven Pifer, and Emil Skodon. Rear Admiral Sam Perez, Commander Tom Sheppard, Morgan Keay, and Jessica Tibbets from the State De- partment, provided valuable insight into how Defense and State work together. Brookings fellows Michael O’Hanlon and Elaine Kamarck were crucial in developing the way ahead and on Goldwater-Nichols reform, and finally Luke Farrell and Brendan Orino, whose tireless efforts in reviewing this paper took it from disparate comments and analysis to a coherent concept. The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent re- search and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommen- dations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. Brookings recognizes that the value it provides to any supporter is in its abso- lute commitment to quality, independence, and impact. Activities supported by its donors reflect this commitment, and the analysis and recommendations of the Institution’s scholars are not determined by any donation. What if before the war, everyone came? Goldwater-Nichols, contradicting policies, political appointees, and misalignment in American foreign policy ROBERT N.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19: Potential Implications for International Security Environment— Overview of Issues and Further Reading for Congress
    COVID-19: Potential Implications for International Security Environment— Overview of Issues and Further Reading for Congress Updated May 28, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46336 SUMMARY R46336 COVID-19: Potential Implications for May 28, 2020 International Security Environment—Overview Ronald O'Rourke of Issues and Further Reading for Congress Specialist in Naval Affairs Some observers argue the COVID-19 pandemic could be a world-changing event with potentially Kathleen J. McInnis profound and long-lasting implications for the international security environment and the U.S. Specialist in International role in the world. Other observers are more skeptical that the COVID-19 pandemic will have Security such effects. Observers who argue the COVID-19 pandemic could be world-changing for the international Michael Moodie security environment and the U.S. role in the world have focused on several areas of potential Assistant Director and change, including the following, which are listed here separately but overlap in some cases and Senior Specialist in Foreign Affairs, Defense and Trade can interact with one another: world order, international institutions, and global governance; U.S. global leadership and the U.S. role in the world; China’s potential role as a global leader; U.S. relations and great power competition with China and Russia, including the use of the COVID-19 pandemic as a theme or tool for conducting ideological competition; the relative prevalence of democratic and authoritarian or autocratic forms of government; societal tension, reform, transformation, and governmental stability in various countries; the world economy, globalization, and U.S. trade policy; the characteristics and conduct of conflict; allied defense budgets and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulitzer Prize Winners and Finalists
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • The American Empire and Its Media
    edia COUNCILon., FOREIGN Est. 1954 Est.1921 Est.1973 RELATIONS THE TRllATERAl COMMISSION . ....�"!"'. & 1 4 n5 146 17 18 158 FOREIGN AFFAIRS FT 0 NY � • PBS. DAILY•NEWS NEWS 250 135 11/C CH c ,I;. fill You 19/C 20/C 100/C 117/B/D/T 118/C 160/C 171/C 172/C [iJ 136 149r7!il ID 26 c c c � ,� -- 2/C '''.it- Ill clHJ ·�D 188/C 189/T 101/C 102/C 119/C 120/C/T PIXt\R 161/C 162/C 181/D 182/C II 72 � 183/C 184/C 13/C 14/C 21/C c 173/C 174/C 36 [9] a -.� ���.a. c .. ts/c 49/C ii. 85/C 86/B/C 104/B/C 121/M 122/C 163/C � 138 - 151 El !Al 60/D 61/B/C • ,. • c T 28 [al ' " c 37 �j llf8'Jil ....... Ji..i. ... ./ 87/C 88/C 124/C a c 50/C 51/C 165/C 166/C 29 3/C � c U..N...l.· ""'..•..•..s...A. L. v �· THE TII\IES 38n -r.: 126/C B/C�,- 75� 175/C 176/C '• " 190/D/T - 127/C 39r7""" 76 154 Sl(Y c c (3N c 'l'heNewVorlr. iA Review of Books' AP i!limcs 64/C 65/C 93/T 111/8/C 112/C/T 129/C Journalists and media executives: New York Daily News and U.S. News & World Report 1: Mortimer B. Zuckerman, publisher [ Slate 2: Jacob Weisberg, group editor I The Nation 3: Katrina VandenHeuvel, publisher [ Foreign Affairs 4: James F.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of Pakistan.Indb
    SSOVIETOVIET FFATESATES AANDND LLOSTOST AALTERNATIVESLTERNATIVES CC5079.indb5079.indb i 44/20/09/20/09 22:08:03:08:03 PPMM CC5079.indb5079.indb iiii 44/20/09/20/09 22:08:03:08:03 PPMM SOVIET FATES AND LOST ALTERNATIVES FFROMROM SSTALINISMTALINISM TTOO TTHEHE NNEWEW CCOLDOLD WWARAR stephen f. cohen columbia university press New York CC5079.indb5079.indb iiiiii 44/20/09/20/09 22:08:03:08:03 PPMM columbia university press publishers since 1893 new york chichester, west sussex Copyright © 2009 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cohen, Stephen F. Soviet fates and lost alternatives : from Stalinism to the new Cold War / Stephen F. Cohen. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-0-231-14896-2 (cloth : alk. paper)—isbn 978-0-231-52042-3 (e-book) 1. Soviet Union—History—1925–1953. 2. Soviet Union—History—1953–1985. 3. Soviet Union—History—1985–1991. 4. Soviet Union—Politics and government. 5. Concentration camp inmates—Soviet Union. 6. Cold War. 7. Gorbachev, Mikhail Sergeevich, 1931– —Political and social views. 8. Post communism—Russia (Federation) 9. Russia (Federation)—Foreign relations—United States. 10. United States—Foreign relations—Russia (Federation) I. Title. dk266.c587 2009 947.084 —dc22 2009000659 Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. This book is printed on paper with recycled content. Printed in the United States of America c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 References to Internet Web sites (URLs) were accurate at the time of writing.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Role in the World: Background and Issues for Congress
    U.S. Role in the World: Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O'Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs Michael Moodie Assistant Director and Senior Specialist in Foreign Affairs, Defense and Trade Updated March 24, 2020 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R44891 U.S. Role in the World: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The U.S. role in the world refers to the overall character, purpose, or direction of U.S. participation in international affairs and the country’s overall relationship to the rest of the world. The U.S. role in the world can be viewed as establishing the overall context or framework for U.S. policymakers for developing, implementing, and measuring the success of U.S. policies and actions on specific international issues, and for foreign countries or other observers for interpreting and understanding U.S. actions on the world stage. While descriptions of the U.S. role in the world since the end of World War II vary in their specifics, it can be described in general terms as consisting of four key elements: global leadership; defense and promotion of the liberal international order; defense and promotion of freedom, democracy, and human rights; and prevention of the emergence of regional hegemons in Eurasia. The issue for Congress is whether the U.S. role in the world is changing, and if so, what implications this might have for the United States and the world. A change in the U.S. role could have significant and even profound effects on U.S. security, freedom, and prosperity. It could significantly affect U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Empire in International Relations
    Comparative Strategy, Vol. 12, p. 365-333 0149-5933/93$10.00 +.00 Printed in the UK. All rights reserved Copyright © 1991 Taylor & Francis The Legacy of Empire in International Relations MARKN. KATZ Dcparunent of Public and International Affairs George Mason University Fairfax, VA 22030-4444 Abstract In the aftermath of the cold war, not only have many nationalist disputes persisted, but many more have erupted, especially in and around the former Soviet Union. /s this nationalist conflict a temporary phenomenon that is likely to disappear, or is it a deep-seated problem that will persist and possibly grow worse? The working hypothesis that this study wiU"fiXamine is that, aside from continued fighting, there are only three alternative outcomes to ethnic conflict occurring within nations: (1) the development of peaceful, multiethnic societies within existing nations, in which ethnic distinctions become unimportant; (2) mainJenance of the status quo by force, in which dissatisfied groups are unable to achieve their goals; and (3) the breakdown of existing nations and the proliferation of small, more ethnically homogenous states. This study will argue that unless governments can bring ahout the first outcome (development of a peaceful multiethnic society), it will be extremely difficult in the post--<:old war era for them to achieve the second outcome (maintenance of the status quo by force). Achieving the first outcome will also be difficult; although many regimes have the stated goal of building a society in which ethnic distinctions become unimportant, they act to preserve existin$? patterns of ethnic dominance. The third outcome (the proliferation of small, ethnically homogenous states) is often regarded as the most difficult to achieve, but it may be the most likely outcome if larger nations cannot be held together on either a volunJary or involuntary basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Neoconservatism Still Matters
    perspectives Why Neoconservatism Still Matters Justin Vaïsse A p r i l 2 0 1 0 The Lowy Institute for International Policy is an independent international policy think tank. Its mandate ranges across all the dimensions of international policy debate in Australia – economic, political and strategic – and it is not limited to a particular geographic region. Its two core tasks are to: • produce distinctive research and fresh policy options for Australia’s international policy and to contribute to the wider international debate. • promote discussion of Australia’s role in the world by providing an accessible and high­ quality forum for discussion of Australian international relations through debates, seminars, lectures, dialogues and conferences. Lowy Institute Perspectives are occasional papers and speeches on international events and policy. The views expressed in this paper are the author’s own and not those of the Lowy Institute for International Policy. Why neoconservatism still matters Justin Vaïsse 1 The world started paying attention to the existence of American neoconservatives in 2002­2003, as they stepped up their campaign in favour of an invasion of Iraq. In the following years, their trajectory was generally seen as a short­lived aberration, a rapid rise and fall ending up in the failure that was the Iraq intervention, discrediting once and for all their idealistic militarism. In other words, neoconservatives are now seen as something of the past. This conventional view, however, is inaccurate on two counts. First, they never had the kind of overbearing influence on the Bush administration many opponents credit them with, including on the Iraq war.
    [Show full text]