DOCSLIB.ORG

Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History Living Resources Committee ICES CM 2002/G:04 Ref. ACFM, ACE REPORT OF THE Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History Rome, Italy 10–12 April 2002 This report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary. The document is a report of an expert group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer Palægade 2–4 DK–1261 Copenhagen K Denmark TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Terms of Reference......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Attendance ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Opening of the Meeting and Arrangements for the Preparation of the Report ............................................... 2 2 LANDINGS AND EFFORT STATISTICS AND SURVEY DATA (TOR A)......................................................... 3 2.1 Compilation of Landing Statistics................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 General Trends................................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 National Trends............................................................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Comparison of ICES and FAO data................................................................................................................ 8 2.5 Conclusions..................................................................................................................................................... 9 3 STOCK IDENTIFICATION AND POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATION (TOR B)................................................. 9 3.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Estimates of population trends based on indices........................................................................................... 10 3.3 Total stock size assessments ......................................................................................................................... 12 3.4 General discussion ........................................................................................................................................ 13 4 GEAR SELECTIVITY (TOR C) ............................................................................................................................. 13 5 POSSIBLE PRECAUTIONARY APPROACHES TO MANAGEMENT (TOR D)............................................... 14 5.1 General considerations.................................................................................................................................. 14 5.2 Management in European cephalopod fisheries............................................................................................ 14 6 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS AFFECTING RECRUITMENT AND DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS (TOR E)15 7 CEPHALOPOD LITERATURE RELEVANT TO FISHERIES (TOR F) .............................................................. 16 8 RESEARCH PRIORITIES ...................................................................................................................................... 16 8.1 Funding for data collection ........................................................................................................................... 16 8.2 Research priorities ........................................................................................................................................ 17 9 THE FUTURE PROGRAMME OF WGCEPH AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................... 18 9.1 Terms of reference ........................................................................................................................................ 18 9.2 Next WGCEPH meeting ............................................................................................................................... 18 10 OTHER BUSINESS AND CLOSING OF THE MEETING ................................................................................... 18 10.1 Exchanges with scientists studying cephalopods in the Mediterranean........................................................ 18 10.2 Information about scientific meetings........................................................................................................... 19 11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 19 12 REFERENCES......................................................................................................................................................... 19 ANNEX 1 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 30 ANNEX 2 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 32 ANNEX 3 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 42 ANNEX 4(I) ..................................................................................................................................................................... 52 ANNEX 4(II).................................................................................................................................................................... 61 WORKING DOCUMENT N° 1....................................................................................................................................... 64 WORKING DOCUMENT N° 2....................................................................................................................................... 69 WORKING DOCUMENT N° 3....................................................................................................................................... 73 WORKING DOCUMENT N° 4....................................................................................................................................... 83 WORKING DOCUMENT N° 5....................................................................................................................................... 91 @# i 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Terms of Reference As indicated in Part 2 of the ICES Annual Report for 2000, ICES Council Resolution C.Res. 2001/2G02 stated that the Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History [WGCEPH] (Chair: Dr .J.P. Robin, France) would meet in Rome, Italy from 10-12 April 2002 to: a) update currently available landing statistics and information on fishing effort and discards; explore existing resource survey databases for information about sampled cephalopods in the ICES area; b) compile methods and results available for stock identification and estimation of population size of fished cephalopods; c) compile available data on gear selectivity for cephalopods; d) identify possible precautionary approaches to the management of cephalopod resources; e) compile available data on relationships between abundance and environmental conditions, factors affecting recruitment, migration and distribution patterns of juveniles and adults, and trophic interactions; f) update the bibliographic database of cephalopod literature relevant to fisheries, including grey literature; WGCEPH will report by 30 April 2002 for the attention of the Living Resources Committee, and ACFM and ACE. 1.2 Attendance The WGCEPH meeting at the ICRAM headquarters, Rome, 10-12 April 2002, was attended by 8 of the currently appointed WGCEPH members. These participants represented 5 ICES member states (France, Germany, Portugal, Spain, UK). Participants: 1) WGCEPH members Name Address Telephone and Fax E-mail Dr Angel F. ECOBIOMAR, Instituto de Investigacions Tel +34-986-231930 [email protected] González Mariñas, Eduardo Cabello 6, E-36208 Vigo, (Ext. 181) Spain Fax: 34 986 292762 Dr Noussithé Université de Caen, 14032 Caen Cedex, Tel +33 231 538016 [email protected] Koueta France Fax +33 231 538009 3Dr. João IPIMAR, Avenida de Brasília, S/N, 1449-006 Tel +351-1-3027000 [email protected] Pereira Lisbon, Portugal Fax +351-1-3015948 Mr. João IPIMAR, Avenida de Brasília, S/N, 1449-006 Tel +351-1-3027000 [email protected] Pereira Lisbon, Portugal Fax +351-1-3015948 Dr Uwe Institut für Meereskunde, Universität Kiel, Tel +49-431-5973908 [email protected] Piatkowski Düsternbrooker Weg 20, D-24105 Kiel, Fax +49-431-565876 kiel.de Germany Dr. Inaki AZTI, Txatxarramendi Ugartea z/g, 48369 Tel +34 946 870700 [email protected] Quincoces Sukarrieta (Bizkaia), Spain Fax +34 946 870006 Dr Jean-Paul Université de Caen, I.B.B.A., Biologie et Tel +33 231 538017 [email protected] Robin (Chair) Biotechnologies Marines, F-14032 Caen Fax +33 231 538009 Cedex, France
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7. Index of Scientific and Vernacular Names
    Cephalopods of the World 249 7. INDEX OF SCIENTIFIC AND VERNACULAR NAMES Explanation of the System Italics : Valid scientific names (double entry by genera and species) Italics : Synonyms, misidentifications and subspecies (double entry by genera and species) ROMAN : Family names ROMAN : Scientific names of divisions, classes, subclasses, orders, suborders and subfamilies Roman : FAO names Roman : Local names 250 FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes No. 4, Vol. 1 A B Acanthosepion pageorum .....................118 Babbunedda ................................184 Acanthosepion whitleyana ....................128 bandensis, Sepia ..........................72, 138 aculeata, Sepia ............................63–64 bartletti, Blandosepia ........................138 acuminata, Sepia..........................97,137 bartletti, Sepia ............................72,138 adami, Sepia ................................137 bartramii, Ommastrephes .......................18 adhaesa, Solitosepia plangon ..................109 bathyalis, Sepia ..............................138 affinis, Sepia ...............................130 Bathypolypus sponsalis........................191 affinis, Sepiola.......................158–159, 177 Bathyteuthis .................................. 3 African cuttlefish..............................73 baxteri, Blandosepia .........................138 Ajia-kouika .................................. 115 baxteri, Sepia.............................72,138 albatrossae, Euprymna ........................181 belauensis, Nautilus .....................51,53–54
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Atlantic Forage Species ID Guide
    Mid-Atlantic Forage Species Identification Guide Forage Species Identification Guide Basic Morphology Dorsal fin Lateral line Caudal fin This guide provides descriptions and These species are subject to the codes for the forage species that vessels combined 1,700-pound trip limit: Opercle and dealers are required to report under Operculum • Anchovies the Mid-Atlantic Council’s Unmanaged Forage Omnibus Amendment. Find out • Argentines/Smelt Herring more about the amendment at: • Greeneyes Pectoral fin www.mafmc.org/forage. • Halfbeaks Pelvic fin Anal fin Caudal peduncle All federally permitted vessels fishing • Lanternfishes in the Mid-Atlantic Forage Species Dorsal Right (lateral) side Management Unit and dealers are • Round Herring required to report catch and landings of • Scaled Sardine the forage species listed to the right. All species listed in this guide are subject • Atlantic Thread Herring Anterior Posterior to the 1,700-pound trip limit unless • Spanish Sardine stated otherwise. • Pearlsides/Deepsea Hatchetfish • Sand Lances Left (lateral) side Ventral • Silversides • Cusk-eels Using the Guide • Atlantic Saury • Use the images and descriptions to identify species. • Unclassified Mollusks (Unmanaged Squids, Pteropods) • Report catch and sale of these species using the VTR code (red bubble) for • Other Crustaceans/Shellfish logbooks, or the common name (dark (Copepods, Krill, Amphipods) blue bubble) for dealer reports. 2 These species are subject to the combined 1,700-pound trip limit: • Anchovies • Argentines/Smelt Herring •
    [Show full text]
  • Dietary Evidence of Mesopelagic and Pelagic Foraging by Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus Thynnus L.) During Autumn Migrations to the Iceland Basin
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 05, 2021 Dietary evidence of mesopelagic and pelagic foraging by Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus L.) during autumn migrations to the Iceland Basin Olafsdottir, Droplaug; MacKenzie, Brian; Chosson-P, Valérie; Ingimundardottir, Thorey Published in: Frontiers in Marine Science Link to article, DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00108 Publication date: 2016 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Olafsdottir, D., MacKenzie, B., Chosson-P, V., & Ingimundardottir, T. (2016). Dietary evidence of mesopelagic and pelagic foraging by Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus L.) during autumn migrations to the Iceland Basin. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3, [108]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00108 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 28 June 2016 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00108 Dietary Evidence of Mesopelagic and Pelagic Foraging by Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus L.) during Autumn Migrations to the Iceland Basin Droplaug Olafsdottir 1*†, Brian R.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History (WGCEPH)
    WORKING GROUP ON CEPHALOPOD FISHERIES AND LIFE HISTORY (WGCEPH; outputs from 2019 meeting) VOLUME 2 | ISSUE 46 ICES SCIENTIFIC REPORTS RAPPORTS SCIENTIFIQUES DU CIEM ICES INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SEA CIEM CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL POUR L’EXPLORATION DE LA MER International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] The material in this report may be reused for non-commercial purposes using the recommended cita- tion. ICES may only grant usage rights of information, data, images, graphs, etc. of which it has owner- ship. For other third-party material cited in this report, you must contact the original copyright holder for permission. For citation of datasets or use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to the latest ICES data policy on ICES website. All extracts must be acknowledged. For other reproduction requests please contact the General Secretary. This document is the product of an expert group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the view of the Council. ISSN number: 2618–1371 I © 2020 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES Scientific Reports Volume 2 | Issue 46 WORKING GROUP ON CEPHALOPOD FISHERIES AND LIFE HISTORY (WGCEPH; outputs from 2019 meeting) Recommended format for purpose of citation: ICES. 2020. Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History (WGCEPH; outputs from 2019 meeting).
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Taningia Danae (Cephalopoda: Octopoteuthidae) in the Mediterranean Sea*
    sm70n1153-2002 1/3/06 16:50 Página 153 SCI. MAR., 70 (1): 153-155 SCIENTIA MARINA 2006 NOTE First record of Taningia danae (Cephalopoda: Octopoteuthidae) in the Mediterranean Sea* ANTONI QUETGLAS 1, KHALED FLITI 2, ENRIC MASSUTÍ 1 , WAHID REFES 3, BEATRIZ GUIJARRO 1 and SAID ZAGHDOUDI 2 1 IEO-Centre Oceanogràfic de Balears, P.O. Box 291, 07015 Palma de Mallorca, Spain. E–mail: [email protected] 2 Ministère de la Pêche et des Ressources Halieutiques, Rue des Canons 16000 Alger, Algeria. 3 Institut des Sciences de la Mer et de l’Aménagement du Littoral, Bois des Cars BP 19, Alger, Algeria. SUMMARY: The capture of a specimen of the oceanic cephalopod Taningia danae Joubin, 1931, caught during a bottom trawl survey carried out off the Algerian coast, is reported for the first time in the Mediterranean Sea. The individual, which was taken at 385-395 m depth, was a juvenile with a 55.6 mm mantle length and age of 132 days. This finding is important as there are few worldwide records of this species. Keywords: first record, Octopoteuthidae, Mediterranean Sea, statoliths. RESUMEN: PRIMERA CITA DE TANINGIA DANAE (CEPHALOPODA: OCTOPOTEUTHIDAE) EN EL MAR MEDITERRÁNEO. – Se cita por primera vez en el Mar Mediterráneo el cefalópodo oceánico Taningia danae Joubin, 1931, capturado en una campaña de arrastre de fondo en las costas de Argelia. El individuo, que fue pescado a 385-395 m de profundidad, era un juvenil de 55.6 mm de longitud del manto y 132 días de edad. Este hallazgo es importante dado el escaso número de especímenes captura- dos en todo el mundo.
    [Show full text]
  • Wgceph Report 2018
    ICES WGCEPH REPORT 2018 ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES AND DYNAMICS STEERING GROUP ICES CM 2018/EPDSG:12 REF. SCICOM Interim Report of the Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History (WGCEPH) 5-8 June 2018 Pasaia, San Sebastian, Spain International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2019. Interim Report of the Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History (WGCEPH), 5–8 June 2018, Pasaia, San Sebastian, Spain. ICES CM 2018/EPDSG:12. 194 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8103 The material in this report may be reused for non-commercial purposes using the recommended citation. ICES may only grant usage rights of information, data, imag- es, graphs, etc. of which it has ownership. For other third-party material cited in this report, you must contact the original copyright holder for permission. For citation of datasets or use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to the latest ICES data policy on ICES website. All extracts must be acknowledged. For other re- production requests, please contact the General Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2019 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGCEPH REPORT 2018 | i Contents Executive summary ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unmanaged Forage Omnibus Amendment
    Unmanaged Forage Omnibus Amendment Amendment 20 to the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery Management Plan Amendment 18 to the Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Fishery Management Plan Amendment 19 to the Surf Clam and Ocean Quahog Fishery Management Plan Amendment 6 to the Bluefish Fishery Management Plan Amendment 5 to the Tilefish Fishery Management Plan Amendment 5 to the Spiny Dogfish Fishery Management Plan Including an Environmental Assessment, Regulatory Impact Review, and Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis March 2017 Prepared by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council in cooperation with the National Marine Fisheries Service Council Address Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council 800 North State Street, Suite 201 Dover, DE 19901 NMFS Address Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 1 1. Executive Summary Forage species are small, low to mid trophic level species which are subject to extensive predation throughout their lifespan and serve as important conduits of energy from low to high trophic levels. Forage species play an important role in sustaining the productivity and structure of marine ecosystems by linking low trophic level species such as phytoplankton and zooplankton to higher trophic level species, including predatory species sought after by commercial and recreational fisheries. Recent scientific studies highlight the importance of forage species to marine ecosystems and suggest that forage species warrant special consideration in fisheries management. This document contains a summary and analysis of management measures considered by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council to prohibit the development of new and expansion of existing directed commercial fisheries on certain unmanaged forage species in Mid-Atlantic Federal waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Overfishing of Small Pelagic Fishes Increases Trophic Overlap Between Immature and Mature Striped Dolphins in the Mediterranean Sea
    Overfishing of Small Pelagic Fishes Increases Trophic Overlap between Immature and Mature Striped Dolphins in the Mediterranean Sea Encarna Go´ mez-Campos1*, Assumpcio´ Borrell1, Luis Cardona1, Jaume Forcada2, Alex Aguilar1 1 Department of Animal Biology-Vertebrates, Institute of Biodiversity Research, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2 British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom Abstract The interactions among diet, ecology, physiology, and biochemistry affect N and C stable isotope signatures in animal tissues. Here, we examined if ecological segregation among animals in relation to sex and age existed by analyzing the signatures of d15Nandd13C in the muscle of Western Mediterranean striped dolphins. Moreover, we used a Bayesian mixing model to study diet composition and investigated potential dietary changes over the last two decades in this population. For this, we compared isotope signatures in samplesofstrandeddolphinsobtainedduringtwoepizootic events occurring in 1990 and 2007–2008. Mean d13C values for females and males were not significantly different, but age-related variation indicated d13C enrichment in both sexes, suggesting that females and males most likely fed in the same general areas, increasing their consumption of benthic prey with age. Enrichment of d15Nwasonlyobserved in females, suggesting a preference for larger or higher trophic level prey than males, which could reflect different nutritional requirements. d13C values showed no temporal variation, although the mean d15Nsignaturedecreased from 1990 to 2007–2008, which could indicate a dietary shift in the striped dolphin over the last two decades. The results of SIAR indicated that in 1990, hake and sardine together contributed to 60% on the diet of immature striped dolphins, and close to 90% for mature striped dolphins.
    [Show full text]
  • CEPHALOPODS A3a.3.1 Introduction
    Offshore Energy SEA A3a.3 CEPHALOPODS A3a.3.1 Introduction This section describes the biology and ecology of the main cephalopod species found within UK waters. Cephalopods are short-lived, carnivorous invertebrates with rapid growth rates that play an important role in marine food webs. Two superorders of the class Cephalopoda are found within the area: the Decapodiformes (squid and cuttlefish) and the Octopodiformes (octopuses). Most cephalopods lack an external shell and are highly mobile predators. They possess complex eyes, similar to those of vertebrates and are often regarded as the most intelligent of invertebrates. The importance of cephalopod stocks to commercial fisheries is increasing, as fish stocks dwindle and become subject to tighter management (Boyle & Pierce 1994). Much of the work carried out on cephalopod distributions and abundances in UK waters is based on landings data and routine research vessel surveys co- ordinated by ICES. Information on the life history, distribution and abundance of these species has been taken from a review of UK cephalopods produced by Hastie et al. (2008), unless otherwise cited. An overview of important cephalopod species in UK waters is provided, followed by a brief description of features specific to each Regional Sea. A3a.3.2 UK context A number of species occur in UK waters, with varying degrees of frequency. Most cephalopods will be in one of five groups: the long-finned squids (Lolignids), the short-finned squids (Ommastrephids), bobtails (Sepiolids), cuttlefish and octopuses. Among the most frequently recorded species are: the long-finned squids, Alloteuthis subulata and Loligo forbesii; the short finned squid, Todarodes sagittatus; other squids, Gonatus fabricii and Onychoteuthis banksii; the bobtail squids, Rossia macrosoma, Sepiola atlantica and Sepietta oweniana; the octopus, Eledone cirrhosa.
    [Show full text]
  • SEA5 Cephalopods
    Strategic Environmental Assessment – SEA 5 - Cephalopods An Overview of Cephalopods Relevant to the SEA 5 Area A review on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry Gabriele Stowasser, Graham J. Pierce, Jianjun Wang and M. Begoña Santos. Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ. Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 2 2. Life history and distribution................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Long-finned squid...................................................................................................... 3 2.2. Short-finned squid...................................................................................................... 5 2.3. Deep-water squid ....................................................................................................... 7 2.4. Other cephalopods ..................................................................................................... 7 3. Ecology: trophic interactions ................................................................................................. 9 4. Fisheries and trends in abundance........................................................................................ 11 4.1. Squid ........................................................................................................................ 12 4.2. Octopus...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Flora and Fauna of the Eastern United States Mollusca: Cephalopoda
    ,----- ---- '\ I ' ~~~9-1895~3~ NOAA Technical Report NMFS 73 February 1989 Marine Flora and Fauna of the Eastern United States Mollusca: Cephalopoda Michael Vecchione, Clyde EE. Roper, and Michael J. Sweeney U.S. Departme~t_ oJ ~9f!l ~~rc~__ __ ·------1 I REPRODUCED BY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE i NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE I ! SPRINGFIELD, VA. 22161 • , NOAA Technical Report NMFS 73 Marine Flora and Fauna of the Eastern United States Mollusca: Cephalopoda Michael Vecchione Clyde F.E. Roper Michael J. Sweeney February 1989 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Robert Mosbacher, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration William E. Evans. Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere National Marine Fisheries Service James Brennan, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Foreword ~-------- This NOAA Technical Report NMFS is part ofthe subseries "Marine Flora and Fauna ofthe Eastern United States" (formerly "Marine Flora and Fauna of the Northeastern United States"), which consists of original, illustrated, modem manuals on the identification, classification, and general biology of the estuarine and coastal marine plants and animals of the eastern United States. The manuals are published at irregular intervals on as many taxa of the region as there are specialists available to collaborate in their preparation. These manuals are intended for use by students, biologists, biological oceanographers, informed laymen, and others wishing to identify coastal organisms for this region. They can often serve as guides to additional information about species or groups. The manuals are an outgrowth ofthe widely used "Keys to Marine Invertebrates of the Woods Hole Region," edited by R.I. Smith, and produced in 1964 under the auspices of the Systematics Ecology Program, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • I Rozporządzenia
    31.3.2009 PL Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej L 87/1 I (Akty przyjęte na mocy Traktatów WE/Euratom, których publikacja jest obowiązkowa) ROZPORZĄDZENIA ROZPORZĄDZENIE PARLAMENTU EUROPEJSKIEGO I RADY (WE) NR 216/2009 z dnia 11 marca 2009 r. w sprawie przekazywania przez paDstwa czBonkowskie prowadzące poBowy na okre[lonych obszarach, innych ni| póBnocny Atlantyk, danych statystycznych o poBowach nominalnych (przeksztaBcenie) (Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG) PARLAMENT EUROPEJSKI I RADA UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ, ryboBówstwa oraz zapewnienie niezbędnej infrastruktury do przetwarzania i kontroli wiarygodno[ci powy|szych uwzględniając Traktat ustanawiający Wspólnotę Europejską, danych jest pierwszym i podstawowym obowiązkiem w szczególno[ci jego art. 285 ust. 1, paDstw czBonkowskich. uwzględniając wniosek Komisji, (5) Kilka paDstw czBonkowskich wystąpiBo z wnioskiem o przedkBadanie danych w innej formie albo za pomocą stanowiąc zgodnie z procedurą okre[loną w art. 251 Traktatu (1), innych [rodków komunikacji ni| okre[lone w załącz- niku V (odpowiednik kwestionariuszy Statlant). a tak|e mając na uwadze, co następuje: (1) Rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 2597/95 z dnia 23 paz- (6) Zrodki konieczne do wykonania niniejszego rozporządze- dziernika 1995 r. w sprawie przekazywania przez paDstwa nia powinny zostać przyjęte zgodnie z decyzją Rady 1999/ czBonkowskie prowadzące poBowy na niektórych obsza- 486/WE z dnia 28 czerwca 1999 r., ustanawiającą warunki rach, innych ni| póBnocny Atlantyk, danych statystycznych wykonywania uprawnieD wykonawczych przyznanych dotyczących poBowów nominalnych (2) zostaBo kilkakrotnie Komisji (4). znacząco zmienione (3). Poniewa| mają być do niego wprowadzone kolejne zmiany, nale|y je przeredagować w celu zapewnienia jasno[ci. (7) W szczególno[ci nale|y przyznać Komisji uprawienienie do dostosowywania wykazów statystycznych obszarów poBo- (2) Wspólnota Europejska uzyskaBa czBonkostwo w Organizacji wowych lub ich podrejonów i gatunków.
    [Show full text]