DOCSLIB.ORG

The Genesis of Think-Tank Culture in Turkey: Past, Present and Future?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Genesis of Think-Tank Culture in Turkey: Past, Present and Future? THE GENESIS OF THINK-TANK CULTURE IN TURKEY: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE? A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY AZ İZ AYDIN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS SEPTEMBER 2006 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunı şık Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Ba ğcı Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Ba ğcı (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. İhsan Da ğı (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Ali L. Karaosmano ğlu (Bilkent Univ., IR) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Aziz Aydın Signature: iii ABSTRACT THE GENESIS OF THINK-TANK CULTURE IN TURKEY: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE? Aydın, Aziz Master of Science, Department of International Relations Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı September 2006, 204 pages This thesis analyses the emergence and evolution of the think-tanks in Turkey. It seeks primarily to answer to whether or not it is possible to mention ‘a think-tank culture’ in Turkey. After the definition, characteristics and types of the think-tank term are debated, the historical background of think-tanks all over the world is analyzed. The thesis looks at similarities and differences among the think-tanks in and outside Turkey in terms of their size and areas of specialization. It also tries to find out who are pioneering to the establishment of think-tanks, whom the think- tanks are serving, which financial resources and functions they have in Turkey. Keywords: think-tank, think-tank culture, NGO, policy making process iv ÖZ TÜRK İYE’DE DÜ ŞÜNCE KURULU ŞU KÜLTÜRÜNÜN DO ĞUŞU: GEÇM İŞ , BUGÜN VE GELECEK? Aydın, Aziz Yüksek Lisans, Uluslararası İli şkiler Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı Eylül 2006, 204 sayfa Bu tez Türkiye’de dü şünce kurulu şlarının do ğuşunu ve geli şimini inceler. Tez, öncelikle, Türkiye’de dü şünce kurulu şu kültüründen bahsedilip bahsedilemeye- ce ğinin cevabını arar. Dü şünce kurulu şu teriminin tanımı, özellikleri ve çe şitleri tartı şıldıktan sonra dünyadaki dü şünce kurulu şlarının tarihsel arkaplanı incelenir. Tez, büyüklükleri ve uzmanla ştıkları alanlara göre Türkiye’deki dü şünce kurulu şlarının yurt dışındakilerden farklarını ve benzerliklerini inceler. Tez, aynı zamanda, Türkiye’de dü şünce kurulu şlarının kurulmasına kimlerin öncülük etti ğini, dü şünce kurulu şlarının kimlere hizmet verdi ğini, bunların hangi mali kaynaklara ve işlevlere sahip oldu ğunu anlamaya çalı şır. Anahtar Kelimeler: dü şünce kurulu şu, dü şünce kurulu şu kültürü, STK, politika olu şturma süreci v To My Family vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my gratitude and appreciation to my advisor, Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Ba ğcı, for his guidance, insight and full comments throughout the research. He proposed this interesting subject to me and he has contributed greatly with his valuable suggestions throughout the thesis. I wish to thank Assist. Prof. Dr. Serhat Güvenç, who let me make use of his unpublished studies. I offer my thanks to Assoc. Prof. Dr. İdris Bal, chairman of AGAM, Prof. Dr. Gökhan Çetinsaya, Şükrü Elekda ğ, Istanbul Deputy of CHP and ambassador (Rt), Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ça ğrı Erhan, Habib Hürmüzlü, former president of the Iraqi Research Center and expert of GSE, Dr. İbrahim Kalın, director of SETA, Bülent Karadeniz, director of SAM, Prof. Dr. Ali L. Karaosmano ğlu, chairman of the Department of International Relations of Bilkent University, Kemal Kılıçdaro ğlu, Istanbul Deputy of CHP, Suat Kınıklıo ğlu, director of GMF’s Ankara office and founding director of ANKAM, Ali Külebi, acting president of TUSAM, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sedat Laçiner, director of USAK, Dr. Nihat Ali Özcan, senior researcher of TEPAV, Prof. Dr. Cihat Özönder, president of KÖKSAV, Dirk Tröndle, deputy representative of KAS’ office in Turkey, Erol Tuncer, president of TESAV, and Dr. Ahmet Yıldız, director of the TGNA Research Center for devoting their time. I would also like to thank the staff of the American Information Research Center, the TGNA Library, and the TGNA Research Center, especially Feride Ero ğlu and Tufan Büyükcan for their support. I wish to thank Cameron Boyle for his editing on the text of this study. Finally, I want to thank my wife, Şilen, and my daughter, Ceren, for their love, support and patience. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM...................................................................................................... iii ABSTRACT ..........................................................................................................iv ÖZ..........................................................................................................................v DEDICATION ......................................................................................................vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................vii TABLE OF CONTENTS.....................................................................................viii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................xi LIST OF TABLES...............................................................................................xvi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................1 2. GENERAL FRAMEWORK FOR THINK-TANKS ....................................6 2.1 The Problem of Definition ..................................................................7 2.2. The Classification of Think-Tanks....................................................11 2.3. Historical Development of Think-Tanks ...........................................17 2.3.1. The First Wave: The Emergence of Think-Tanks ..................19 2.3.2. The Second Wave: The Spread of Think-Tanks in the OECD Countires ..............................................................................20 2.3.3. The Third Wave: The World-Wide Think-Tank Boom..........21 2.3.4. The Fourth Wave: The Transnatinalization of Think-Tanks...25 2.4. Approaches to Analyze Think-Tanks ................................................28 2.5. The Role and Function of Think-Tanks.............................................30 2.6. The Influence of Think-Tanks...........................................................35 2.7. The Funding of Think-Tanks ............................................................41 3. THE EVOLUTION OF THINK-TANKS IN TURKEY ............................45 3.1. The genesis of Think-Tanks in Turkey..............................................45 3.1.1. The Economic and Social Studies Conference Board ............48 3.1.2. The Economic Research Foundation .....................................50 3.1.3. The Foundation for Economic Development .........................52 3.1.4. The Foreign Policy Institute ..................................................54 3.2. Emergence of New Think-Tanks in the Period of 1980-1990 ............56 3.2.1. The Political and Social Studies Foundation..........................58 3.2.2. The Foundation for Middle East and Balkan Studies .............59 viii 3.2.3. The Turkish Branch Office of Konrad Adenauer Stiftung......60 3.2.4. The Marmara Group Strategic and Social Researches Foundation............................................................................61 3.2.5. The Turkish Democracy Foundation .....................................62 3.2.6. The Istanbul Branch of Orient Institute..................................64 3.2.7. The Turkish Branch Office of Friedrich Ebert Stiftung..........65 3.2.8. The Islamic Research Center.................................................66 3.2.9. The Turkish Social, Economic, Political Research Foundation............................................................................67 3.3. New Political Climate and Think-Tanks in the Period of 1991-1999.68 3.3.1. KÖK Social and Strategic Research Foundation....................70 3.3.2. The Turkish Branch Office of Friedrich Naumann Stiftung ...70 3.3.3. The Social, Economic, Political Research Foundation ...........71 3.3.4. The Turkish Branch Office of Heinreich Böll Stiftung ..........72 3.3.5. The Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation ..........73 3.3.6. The ARI Movement ..............................................................77 3.3.7. The Association for Liberal Thinking....................................78 3.3.8. The National Policy Research Foundation.............................81 3.3.9. The Yükseli ş Economic and Strategic Research Foundation..82 3.3.10. The Center for Strategic Research .........................................82 3.3.11. The National Committee for Strategic Research and Studies .84 3.3.12. The Center for Eurasian Strategic Studies .............................85 3.4. Proliferation of Think-Tanks in the 2000s.........................................87 3.4.1. The Economists’ Platform.....................................................89
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liberal Düşünce, Hakemli Bir Dergidir
    Üç Aylık, Yerel-Süreli Dergi Yıl 23, Sayı 91-92, Yaz-Güz 2018 liberal düşünce, hakemli bir dergidir Yayın Kurulu Sahibi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Adnan Küçük, Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Kırıkkale Liberte Yayıncılık A.Ş. adına, Prof. Dr. Ahmet Kemal Bayram, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul Hatice Özlem Yılmaz Prof. Dr. Ahmet Nuri Yurdusev, Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara Doç. Dr. Alim Yılmaz, Medipol Üniversitesi, İstanbul Editör Prof. Dr. Atilla Yayla, Medipol Üniversitesi, İstanbul Prof. Dr. Bahadır Akın, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Konya Buğra Kalkan Doç. Dr. Bahattin Karademir, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana Prof. Dr. Bekir Berat Özipek, Medipol Üniversitesi, İstanbul Yardımcı Editörler Prof. Dr. Cemal Fedayi, Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Kırıkkale Salih Zeki Haklı, Serdar Korucu Doç. Dr. Cennet Uslu, Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Kırıkkale Prof. Dr. Fuat Erdal, İbn Haldun Üniversitesi, İstanbul Prof. Dr. Fuat Oğuz, Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi, Ankara Yazı İşleri Müdürü Prof. Dr. Haluk Alkan, İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul Büşra Sönmez Prof. Dr. Hamza Al, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya Doç. Dr. Hasan Yücel Başdemir, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara ISSN 1300-8781 Prof. Dr. Kürşat Aydoğan, Bilkent Üniversitesi, Ankara Basım Tarihi: Aralık 2018 Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Levent Korkut, Medipol Üniversitesi, İstanbul Prof. Dr. Mehmet Turhan, Çankaya Üniversitesi, Ankara Dr. Murat Yılmaz, Ankara İç Tasarım: Emre Turku Prof. Dr. Ömer Çaha, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul Kapak: Mesut Koçak Prof. Dr. Tanel Demirel, Çankaya Üniversitesi, Ankara Özlem Çağlar Yılmaz, Liberal Düşünce Topluluğu, Ankara Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Yasemin Abayhan, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara Prof. Dr. Yavuz Atar, İbn Haldun Üniversitesi, İstanbul Uluslararası Danışma Kurulu Prof. Dr. Angelo Maria Petroni, Roma Sapienza Üniversitesi, İtalya Prof. Dr. Chandran Kukathas, Londra Ekonomi ve Siyaset Bilimi Okulu, İngiltere Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • AKADEMİK BAKIŞ Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler E‐Dergisi ISSN:1694 – 528X Sayı: 14 Nisan – 2008
    AKADEMİK BAKIŞ Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler E‐Dergisi ISSN:1694 – 528X Sayı: 14 Nisan – 2008 İktisat ve Girişimcilik Üniversitesi – Türk Dünyası Kırgız – Türk Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Celalabat – KIRGIZİSTAN LİBERAL DEVLET VE SOSYAL ADALET POLİTİKALARINA HAYEK’Çİ BİR BAKIŞ Salih ALP Sakarya Üniversitesi SBE İktisat Anabilim Dalı Doktora Öğrencisi Adem KARAKAŞ Sakarya Üniversitesi İİBF İktisat Bölümü Araştırma Görevlisi ÖZET Devletin işlevleri ve sınırlarına dair kadim tartışmalar içerisinde F.A.Hayek’in düşüncelerinin önemli bir konumu vardır. Klasik liberal düşünce çerçevesinde devlet olgusunu inceleyen düşünür, devletin kurumsal yapısı ve devletin kamusal boyutu üzerine önemli tespitlerde bulunmuştur. Liberal devlet anlayışı ve kanun hakimiyeti bağlamında sınırlı bir devlet anlayışını savunan Hayek, bu sınırlar içerisinde sosyal adalet konusuna sıkça temas etmiştir. Sosyal adalet kavramından hareketle devletin bu yönde yaptığı çabaların yersizliğini savunmuş ve bu tür çabaların piyasanın işlerliğini bozucu bir etki oluşturacağını ifade etmiştir. Minimal devlet anlayışından farklı olarak, sınırlı ve sorumlu bir devlet mekanizmasına temas eden Hayek, devletin, vergilendirme, eğitim, güvenlik ve hizmet sektörü gibi alanlarda meydana getirdiği etkileri de sorgulamıştır. Refah devleti anlayışıyla birlikte sosyal adalet kavramının da temellerini sorgulayan düşünür, sosyal adalet düşüncesinin kaynağından başlamak üzere etkilerini analiz etmiş ve liberal bir devletin temel yapıtaşlarını örmeye çalışmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: F.A.Hayek,
    [Show full text]
  • Hayek'te Sosyal, İktisadi Ve Siyasal Teorilerin Bütünselliği
    Hayek’te Sosyal, İktisadi ve Siyasal Teorilerin Bütünselliği Abdullah Metin Arş. Gör. | Gazi Üniversitesi, İİBF, Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü Metin Özkan Arş. Gör. | Gazi Üniversitesi, İİBF, Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü Öz Bu makalenin amacı, Avusturyalı iktisatçı Friedrich von Hayek’in sosyal, iktisadi ve siyasal te- orisi arasındaki bağı ortaya koymaktır. Her bir teori bir yapıya tekabül eder. Yapıların oluştur- duğu genel sistemin varlığını devam ettirebilmesi için, yapılar arasında dolayısıyla da teoriler arasında bir uyum olması gerekir. Hayek’in genel teorisinin merkezinde kendiliğinden doğan düzen yer alır. Kendiliğinden doğan düzenin teminatı olan bireycilik ve özgürlük sosyal yapıyı; rekabet ve mülkiyet iktisadi yapıyı; demokrasi ve kanun hâkimiyeti ise siyasi yapıyı şekillendi- rir. Bu üç yapı arasında da bir uyumdan bahsedilebilir. Hayek, siyasi ve iktisadi yapı arasındaki uyumu piyasa; siyasi ve sosyal yapı arasındaki uyumu demarşi, iktisadi ve sosyal yapı arasın- daki uyumu ise katallaksi üzerinden ifade eder. Anahtar Kelimeler: Hayek, Demarşi, Katallaksi, Piyasa, Kendiliğinden Doğan Düzen. Abstract This study intends to uncover the relation between social, economic and political theories of Friedrich von Hayek who is the Austrian economist. Each theory corresponds to one specific structure. As proceeding of the mainstream system formed by structure, it is necessary to be a conformity between the structures thereby between the theories. Spontaneous order is the center of Hayek’s grand theory. Individualism and liberty which are the warranties of spontaneous order, shape the social structure; competition and property shape the economic structure; democracy and rule of law shape the political structure. It can be stated that there is a conformity between these three structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives
    ALTERNATIVES TURKISH JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS FOUNDER EDITOR To cite this Special issue: Bulent ARAS Amour, Philipp O., ed. “The Arab Spring: Comparative EDITOR Perspectives and Regional Implications.” Special issue, Kenan DAGCI Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 11, no. 3, (Fall 2013): 01-113. GUEST EDITOR FOR THIS SPECIAL ISSUE To cite this article: Philipp O. Amour (Boğaziçi University, outgoing) Foley, Sean, “When Life Imitates Art: The Arab Spring, the www.philipp-amour.ch Middle East, and the Modern World,” in “The Arab Spring: EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS FOR THIS SPECIAL Comparative Perspectives and Regional Implications,” ed. ISSUE: Kaitlin Shaw, University of Michigan Philipp O. Amour, Special issue, Alternatives: Turkish Mahdieh Aghazadeh, Fatih University Journal of International Relations 11, no. 3, (Fall 2013): Tala Mattar, University of Bristol 32-46. INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD* Ibrahim Abu-Rabi, Editor, Muslim World; Berdal Aral, Fatih University; Bulent Aras, Istanbul Technical University; Uri Avnery, Gush Shalom; Huseyin Bagci, Middle East Technical University; Kayhan Barzegar, Islamic Azad University; Mark Bassin, University of London; C. George Caffentzis, University of Southern Maine; Omer Caha, Fatih University; M. Efe Caman, Yalova University; Gokhan Cetinsaya, Istanbul Sehir University; Michel Chossudovsky, University of Ottowa; Murat Cizakca, Bahcesehir University; Kenan Dagci, Yalova University; Vedat Demir, Istanbul University; Takis Fotopoulos, Editor, Democracy and Nature; Vassilis Fouskas, Kingston University; Bulent Gokay, Keele University; Adnan Hayajneh, Hashemite University; Metin Heper, Bilkent University; Christopher Houston, La Trobe University; Anne Joyce, Editor, Middle East Policy; Ersin Kalaycioglu, Sabancı University; M. Lutfullah Karaman, Fatih University; Ijaz Khan, University of Peshawar; Tayseer Al-Khunaizi, King Fahd University; Kemal Kirisci, Bogazici University; Aleksander Kornilov, State University of Nizhni Novgorod; Ali Mazrui, University of Binghampton; Robert W.
    [Show full text]
  • Fethullah Gülen's Thought and Practice: an Attempt to Reconcile Islam with Secularism Nazila Isgandarova
    Consensus Volume 35 Article 6 Issue 1 Christianity and Islam in Dialogue 5-25-2014 Fethullah Gülen's Thought and Practice: An Attempt to Reconcile Islam with Secularism Nazila Isgandarova Follow this and additional works at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/consensus Part of the Practical Theology Commons Recommended Citation Isgandarova, Nazila (2014) "Fethullah Gülen's Thought and Practice: An Attempt to Reconcile Islam with Secularism," Consensus: Vol. 35 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/consensus/vol35/iss1/6 This Articles is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consensus by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Isgandarova: Fethullah Gülen's Thought and Practice Fethullah Gülen's Thought and Practice: An Attempt to Reconcile Islam with Secularism Nazila Isgandarova Spiritual and Religious Care Coordinator Ontario Multifaith Council Introduction ethullah Gülen is a well-known Turkish Islamic scholar who has inspired an Islamic resurgence in Turkey since the 1950s. This is the time when Turkish society re- F explored their Islamic identity after decades of decline of Islam in Turkey (1923- 1950). Nonetheless, secularism is still the main identity of postmodern Turkey with its secular constitution, but there is a growing influence by moderate and liberal Muslims, and Islam continues to impact the moral standards on the Turkish population, 90 percent of whom identify themselves as Muslims. Meanwhile, despite the increasing importance of Islamic values on sociopolitical life in Turkish society, Turkey cannot be labeled as a fundamentalist or Islamic state because the following parameters of a secular society defined by D.
    [Show full text]
  • Extremism and Terrorism
    Turkey: Extremism and Terrorism On April 15, 2020, Turkey launched airstrikes in northern Iraq, seeking to target members of the Kurdistan Worker’s Party (PKK), an internationally designated terrorist organization that has been in conflict with the Turkish government for decades. The military drone struck the Makhmour refugee camp—which the Turkish government claims as a hotbed of the PKK—killing two refugee women in the process. According to Iraq’s Foreign Affairs Ministry, the strikes were a violation of Iraq’s sovereignty. On April 13, Turkish security forces prevented Syrian “terrorists” from entering Mardin state, southeastern Turkey. According to intelligence gathered from Turkey’s National Intelligence Organization (MIT), the suspects allegedly sought to carry out a bombing in Turkey. The suspects manage to escape and leave behind explosives and detonators. In June 2020, Turkish troops moved deeper into Iraq in a new offensive against the PKK called Operation Claw-Tiger. After a Turkish drone killed two Iraqi border guards and their driver in August 2020, Turkey declared it would continue striking against the PKK in Iraq. (Sources: New York Times, Asharq Al-Awsat, Al Jazeera) On March 11, 2020, Turkish security forces launched the “Kapan-7 Garisa” counterterrorism operation in the country’s eastern Siirt province. The operation deployed almost 500 personnel to the region in order to undermine the threat of the PKK. Currently, the PKK has a relatively strong presence and a number of bases in Turkey’s eastern and southeastern provinces where the operation will largely be concentrated. (Source: Daily Sabah) On October 9, 2019, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdo?an announced the start of Operation Peace Spring.
    [Show full text]
  • The Place of Social Identity in Turkey's Foreign Policy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bilkent University Institutional Repository THE PLACE OF SOCIAL IDENTITY IN TURKEY’S FOREIGN POLICY OPTIONS IN THE POST-COLD WAR ERA IN THE LIGHT OF LIBERAL AND CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACHES A Master’s Thesis by RAMAZAN KILINÇ Department of International Relations Bilkent University Ankara September 2001 To Asst. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Kibaroğlu THE PLACE OF SOCIAL IDENTITY IN TURKEY’S FOREIGN POLICY OPTIONS IN THE POST-COLD WAR ERA IN THE LIGHT OF LIBERAL AND CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACHES The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by RAMAZAN KILINÇ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS in THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2001 Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Kürşat Aydoğan Director I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree on Master of International Relations Prof. Dr. Duygu Bazoğlu Sezer Thesis Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree on Master of International Relations Prof. Dr. Atila Eralp Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree on Master of International Relations Asst. Prof. Dr. Serdar Güner Examining Committee Member ABSTRACT THE PLACE OF SOCIAL IDENTITY IN TURKEY’S FOREIGN POLICY OPTIONS IN THE POST-COLD WAR ERA IN THE LIGHT OF LIBERAL AND CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACHES Kılınç, Ramazan Master, Department of International Relations Supervisor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Yesterday Today Tomorrow 1995 - 2015
    1 YESTERDAY TODAY TOMORROW 1995 - 2015 The last 20 years of Freedom of Expression in Turkey - Report - 3 A huge ‘Thank’ to... ...and a huge Homage á... All who worked to have this report completed and published... ...to our editorial team, Elvan Öğ, Sıla Kayhan, Fezile Osum, Lara Vural; to our technical supporter Emrah Eşki, for design and illustrations, to cartoonists and Selçuk Demirel who drew our logos and standard cover illistration, uncanged since 1995, …to all criminals (!) –almost 80.000 people- who put their names under the troubled statements, regardless of contents, no matter if they disagree; just to defend freedom of expression for all; ...Socrates, to Galileo, Mansur Al-Hallaj, to Giardino Bruno, …to all journalists, journal editors, column writers, TV Voltaire, Mahatma Ghandi, to Martin Luther King, Nelson programmers, TV editors, who worked with pleasure to have Mandela ... our voice heard by the public; to all judges, prosecutors, lawyers, bailiffs, policemen and peddlers, charged or working at court ...and our dear crime-partners whom we lot during these 20 years but keep their memories in our hearts... houses, who recognized what we were trying to do, respected and supported, ...Hrant Dink, Aziz Nesin, Erdal Öz, Bülent Tanör, Demirtaş Ceyhun, Cenk Koray, Metin Özek, Uğur Cankoçak, Zihni ...and national and International organizations, our all-time Anadol, Arif Damar, Atıf Yılmaz, Şaban Dayanan, İlhan Selçuk, supporters, a.i., HRW, International PEN and its national İsmail Gülgeç, Hüseyin Baş, M. Tali Öngören, M. Ali Birand, members, Article 19, Index on Censorship, Freedom House, RSF, Ömer Kavur, Hüseyin Sağnıç, Abdülmelik Fırat, Noyan Özkan, CPJ, and our umbrella organizatin IFEX; but especially to three Süleyman Üstün, Toktamış Ateş, Yusuf Kurçenli, Mina Urgan, very special people: dear Eugene Schoulgin, dear Jonathan Onur Yurdatapan, Sacit Kayasu ..
    [Show full text]
  • ISLAMIC FOUNDATIONS of a FREE SOCIETY
    ISLAMIC FOUNDATIONS of a FREE SOCIETY Edited by NOUH EL HARMOUZI & LINDA WHETSTONE Islamic Foundations of a Free Society ISLAMIC FOUNDATIONS OF A FREE SOCIETY EDITED BY NOUH EL HARMOUZI AND LINDA WHETSTONE with contributions from MUSTAFA ACAR • SOUAD ADNANE AZHAR ASLAM • HASAN YÜCEL BAŞDEMIR KATHYA BERRADA • MASZLEE MALIK • YOUCEF MAOUCHI HICHAM EL MOUSSAOUI • M. A. MUQTEDAR KHAN BICAN ŞAHIN • ATILLA YAYLA First published in Great Britain in 2016 by The Institute of Economic Affairs 2 Lord North Street Westminster London SW1P 3LB in association with London Publishing Partnership Ltd www.londonpublishingpartnership.co.uk The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. Copyright © The Institute of Economic Affairs 2016 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photo- copying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-0-255-36729-5 (interactive PDF) Many IEA publications are translated into languages other than English or are reprinted. Permission to translate or
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Dr. Atilla Yayla Cato Institute, Washington a Respected Political
    Prof. Dr. Atilla Yayla Cato Institute, Washington A respected political scientist, Dr. Atilla Yayla of the Gazi University of Ankara, Turkey, has been dismissed from his teaching position and pilloried in the press in Turkey for daring publicly to make critical remarks about the legacy of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, whose version of “secularism” has meant state control of and suppression of religion. Kemalist secularism is not well understood by Americans and Europeans. As Dr. Yayla put it some years ago (about 10, I think) at a seminar on Islam and civil society I organized for him at the Cato Institute, “People say that you have separation of church and state in America and we have separation of mosque-and-church and state in Turkey. In America, that means freedom of religion. In Turkey, it means freedom from religion. There is a great difference between the two.” Private property, contract, and limited government, he argued, should create the framework for people to decide on their own, through voluntary cooperation, whether and how to build a mosque, a church, a synagogue, or anything else. Such decisions should not be made by state officials. Atilla was calm during the hot discussion that followed and offered a voice of reason and true liberalism, as passionate secularists and Islamists around the seminar table argued against each other, the former for suppressing and controlling religion by force and the latter for imposing it by force. One secularist even showed a calculation of how many square meters a Muslim needs to pray, multiplied it by the Muslim population of Turkey, calculated the number of square meters of Mosque space in Turkey, and concluded that Turkey had a 50 percent surplus capacity of Mosque space, and therefore that no more should be allowed to be built.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact on Transition Countries
    Alternative Politics, Vol. 4, No. 3, 342-353, November 2012 342 AN EVALUATION ON THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF HAYEK AND ITS POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS* Ahmet ÖZALP** ABSTRACT Although not an anti-rationalist, Hayek established his discourse against constructivist rationalism. He distinguished between two kinds of rationalism: evolutionary rationalism and constructive rationalism. Hayekian epistemology emphasised the interest in evolutionary rationalism by criticizing the constructive rationalism. Evolutionary rationalism (or British tradition) is based on the interpretation of traditions and institutions that have spontaneously developed. Meanwhile, constructive rationalism, which emerged in France, is known as French tradition. Constructivist rationalism has aimed at constructing a utopia according to some assumptions about the unlimited powers of human reason. Hayek’s economic and political thoughts are part of or a prolongation of this epistemology. In parallel with this epistemology, the political structure proposed by Hayek is a limited state and the restriction of any power. We aim to explain the relationship between Hayek’s important key concepts—namely, anti-constructivism and spontaneous order. Hayek’s main thesis is that even a small intervention in spontaneous order, such as free market or great society through planning (or anything else), might lead to the destruction of freedom. In addition, Hayek established his theory against a welfare state containing the concept of planning. His emphasis has been reflected as a defence of the free market concept and the critics of planning or interfering in the state. According to Hayek, political power or the state behaves according to the rules. Keywords: Constructivist Rationalism, Evolutionary Rationalism, Spontaneous Order, Planned Economy. HAYEK’İN EPİSTEMOLOJİSİ VE POLİTİK SONUÇLARI ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME ÖZET Hayek, söylemini kurucu rasyonalizme karşı oluşturmuştur.
    [Show full text]
  • Sayi-61-62.Pdf
    Üç Aylık Dergi Yıl 16, Sayı 61-62, Kış-Bahar 2011 Takdim ............................................................................................................................................................3 Marksizm Niçin Hâlâ Popüler? ..............................................................................................................7 Atilla Yayla “Aydınlık Bir Adam: Korkut Boratav” Üzerine Bir Değinme ................................................... 23 Tanel Demirel Demokrasi Teorisine Geri Dönüş ...................................................................................................... 39 Giovanni Sartori Demokratik Devletin Gerekleri ve Türkiye ..................................................................................... 49 Efe Baştürk Karşılaştırmalı Bir Perspektiften Anayasalar ve Temsil Ettikleri Değerler ...................... 61 Serdar Gülener Osmanlı Modernleşmesi, Fransız İhtilali ve Ahmed Şuayb Örneği ...................................... 77 Atila Doğan Cemevleri-Dedelerin Statüsü ve AB Ülkelerindeki Uygulamalar .......................................... 97 Bilal Sambur Topluluk, İktidar İlişkileri, Birey ve Müzakereci Demokrasi ..................................................111 Ahmet Kemal Bayram Pierre Bourdieu Sosyolojisinde “Habitus”, “Sermaye” ve “Alan” Üzerine ........................121 Adem Palabıyık Kuvvetler Ayrılığı: Bir İndirgeme ve Dönüşüm ..........................................................................143 İrfan Çelik Türkiye’de Partilerin Oy Toplama Stratejisi
    [Show full text]