DOCSLIB.ORG

Skookumchuck Wind Energy Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Skookumchuck Wind Energy Project Skookumchuck Wind Energy Project Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan and Incidental Take Permit for Marbled Murrelet, Bald Eagle, and Golden Eagle Lewis and Thurston Counties, Washington Final Environmental Impact Statement Lead Agency: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region 911 NE 11th Avenue Portland, OR 97232 Prepared by: Anchor QEA. LLC 6720 SW Macadam Avenue Suite 125 Portland, OR 97219 Estimated Lead Agency Total Costs Associated with Developing and Producing the EIS: $736,000 May 2019 COVER SHEET Title of Proposed Action: Skookumchuck Wind Energy Project Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan and Incidental Take Permit for Marbled Murrelet, Bald Eagle, and Golden Eagle. Subject: Final Environmental Impact Statement Lead Agency: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service County/State: Lewis and Thurston Counties, Washington Abstract: The Skookumchuck Wind Energy Project, LLC (Applicant), a wholly owned subsidiary of Renewable Energy Systems, Ltd., has determined that operations and maintenance activities associated with the Skookumchuck Wind Energy Project (Project) have the potential to result in take of marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), listed as federally threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, and bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA)—collectively, the Covered Species—and is seeking an incidental take permit (ITP) pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA, as amended (16 United States Code [USC] 1531 et seq., 1539) for take of the Covered Species that could result from Project operations and maintenance activities. Doing so would also confer take authorization as required under the BGEPA (16 USC 668–668c, 50 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 22.261) without the need for a separate bald and golden eagle permit. This Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) by Anchor QEA, LLC, pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 USC 4321 et seq.) to evaluate the effects of the Service’s Proposed Action to issue the ITP for Project operation and maintenance (O&M) activities, limited to wind turbine generator (WTG) operation, maintenance, and site management. Key issues include the assessment of the potential for impacts associated with the different alternatives and the corresponding need to implement conservation strategies to offset these impacts on the Covered Species. For Information, Contact: Curtis Tanner U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 510 Desmond Dr. SE, Suite 102 Lacey, WA 98503 360-753-4326 [email protected] 1 The BGEPA prohibits take specifically of bald and golden eagles. Permitting requirements are set forth in 50 CFR 22.26 and 74 Federal Register 46835. Skookumchuck Wind Energy Project Final Environmental Impact Statement C-1 May 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ..................................................................................................................................... S-1 1 Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................................1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................1 Proposed Federal Action .................................................................................................1 Purpose and Need for Action ..........................................................................................2 Decision to be Made........................................................................................................2 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................................3 Regulatory Context .........................................................................................................4 2 Alternatives Including the Proposed Action ........................................................................5 Project Location ..............................................................................................................5 No Action Alternative .....................................................................................................6 Alternative 1 – Habitat Conservation Plan......................................................................7 2.3.1 Operations and Maintenance Activities ..............................................................7 2.3.2 Conservation Measures .......................................................................................9 2.3.3 Monitoring ........................................................................................................14 2.3.4 Adaptive Management ......................................................................................15 Alternative 2 – Modified Project Site Design ...............................................................15 Alternative 3 – Enhanced Curtailment ..........................................................................16 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study ......................................17 2.6.1 Alternate Project Siting Locations ....................................................................17 2.6.2 Project Operation and Maintenance Without Incidental Take Coverage ..........17 2.6.3 Emerging Technologies Alternative .................................................................18 3 Affected Environment ..........................................................................................................18 Introduction ...................................................................................................................18 3.1.1 Study Area .........................................................................................................18 Geology and Soils .........................................................................................................18 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................19 Water Resources............................................................................................................19 Vegetation and Wetlands ..............................................................................................20 3.5.1 Project Area .......................................................................................................20 3.5.2 Mitigation Areas................................................................................................22 Fish and Wildlife ...........................................................................................................22 3.6.1 Fish ....................................................................................................................22 Skookumchuck Wind Energy Project Final Environmental Impact Statement i May 2019 3.6.2 Birds ..................................................................................................................23 3.6.3 Bats ....................................................................................................................24 3.6.4 Mammals ...........................................................................................................25 3.6.5 Reptiles and Amphibians ..................................................................................26 Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species ..................................................................27 3.7.1 Marbled Murrelet ..............................................................................................32 3.7.2 Bald and Golden Eagle......................................................................................35 3.7.3 Pileated Woodpecker ........................................................................................37 3.7.4 Vaux’s Swift .....................................................................................................37 3.7.5 Northern Goshawk ............................................................................................38 3.7.6 Townsend’s Big-Eared Bat ...............................................................................38 Land Use and Recreation ..............................................................................................39 Visual Resources ...........................................................................................................40 Cultural and Historic Resources....................................................................................40 Tribal Resources............................................................................................................41 Transportation ...............................................................................................................41 Noise ...........................................................................................................................42 Public Services and Utilities .........................................................................................42 Health and Safety ..........................................................................................................43 Socioeconomics.............................................................................................................44 3.16.1 Employment and Income ..................................................................................45 3.16.2 Population
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Texas Transportation Planning for Future Renewable Energy Projects: Final Report (FHWA 0-6850-1)
    TECHNICAL REPORT 0-6850-1 TXDOT PROJECT NUMBER 0-6850 Texas Transportation Planning for Future Renewable Energy Projects: Final Report Sebastian Astroza Priyadarshan N. Patil Katherine I. Smith Vivek Kumar Chandra R. Bhat Zhanmin Zhang August 2016; Published March 2017 http://library.ctr.utexas.edu/ctr-publications/0-6850-1.pdf Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-16/0-6850-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Texas Transportation Planning for Future Renewable Energy August 2016; Published March 2017 Projects: Final Report 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Sebastian Astroza, Priyadarshan N. Patil, Katherine I. Smith, 0-6850-1 Vivek Kumar, Chandra R. Bhat, Zhanmin Zhang 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-6850 1616 Guadalupe Street, Suite 4.202 Austin, TX 78701 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office January 2015–August 2016 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation. 16. Abstract There will be a significant increase in the number of renewable energy production facilities in Texas. The construction of wind farms requires the transport of wind turbine components that create increased loads on rural roads and bridges. These rural roads and bridges are typically not designed for such loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Centralia Flood Damage Reduction Project Chehalis River, Washington
    m U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District Centralia Flood Damage Reduction Project Chehalis River, Washington Final General Reevaluation Report June 2003 Centralia Flood Damage Reduction Project June 2003 Final General Reevaluation Report PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Centralia Flood Damage Reduction Project June 2003 Final General Reevaluation Report Centralia Flood Damage Reduction Project Chehalis River, Washington General Reevaluation Study Final General Reevaluation Report US Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District June 2003 i Centralia Flood Damage Reduction Project June 2003 Final General Reevaluation Report PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Centralia Flood Damage Reduction Project June 2003 Final General Reevaluation Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Seattle District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps, USACE) and Lewis County, Washington, have collaborated to re-evaluate a previously authorized flood damage reduction project in the Chehalis River Basin. This general reevaluation study was conducted in response to Resolution 2581 of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, which directed a review of past Corps report recommendations in the study area and a reevaluation of flooding and environmental problems and solutions. The purpose of this General Reevaluation Report (GRR) is to document the planning and formulation of the recommended plan. Similar to a traditional feasibility report, the GRR documents all aspects of acceptability, completeness, effectiveness, and efficiency of a broad range of alternatives. The report also identifies requirements and responsibilities associated with project implementation, operation, and maintenance. The main text of the report summarizes major technical studies conducted. Technical appendices provide detailed descriptions of study methodologies and findings. An Environmental Impact Statement, that has been published under separate cover, accompanies the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Lands of Long-Term Commercial Significance Inventory Study Thurston County Planning Department Long Range Plann
    associated earth sciences incorporated Thurston County Mineral Lands Project - Geologic Inventory and Classification Study MINERAL RESOURCE LANDS OF LONG-TERM COMMERCIAL SIGNIFICANCE INVENTORY STUDY Prepared For: THURSTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING SECTION August 30, 2017 Project No. 160529H002 Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 911 5th Avenue Kirkland, WA 98033 P (425) 827 7701 F (425) 827 5424 Mineral Resource Lands of Long-Term Commercial Significance Inventory Study Thurston County Mineral Lands Project Thurston County, Washington Geologic Inventory and Classification Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 METHODOLOGY....................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Description of the Resource Identification Process ........................................................................ 2 2.2.1 Geologic Information and the Identification Process ......................................................... 2 2.2.2 Other Pertinent Geologic Information ................................................................................ 4 2.2.3 LiDAR Information and the Identification Process .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact of the Pleasant Ridge Wind Energy Project
    PLEASANT RIDGE EXHIBIT 115 Economic Impact of the Pleasant Ridge Wind Energy Project October 2013 David G. Loomis, Ph.D. 2705 Kolby Court Bloomington, IL 61704 309-242-4690 Dr. David G. Loomis is About the Professor of Economics at Illinois State University and Director Author of the Center for Renewable Energy. He has over 10 years experience in the wind industry and has performed economic analyses at the county, region, state and national levels for both wind farms and the wind turbine supply chain. He has served as a consultant for the State of Illinois, Illinois Finance Authority, Illinois State Energy Office, Invenergy, Clean Line Energy Partners, Illinois Chamber of Commerce, Geronimo Energy and others. He has testified on the economic impacts of wind energy before the Illinois Senate Energy and Environment Committee and the LaSalle and Livingston County Boards in Illinois. Dr. Loomis is a widely recognized expert and has been quoted in the Wall Street Journal, Forbes Magazine, Associated Press, and Chicago Tribune as well as appearing on CNN. Dr. Loomis has published over 15 peer-reviewed articles in leading energy policy and economics journals. He has raised and managed over $5 million in grant and contracts from government, corporate and foundation sources. He received the 2011 Department of Energy’s Midwestern Regional Wind Advocacy Award and the 2006 Best Wind Working Group Award. Dr. Loomis received his Ph.D. in economics from Temple University in 1995. I. Executive Summary of Findings .................................................................. 1 Table of II. U.S. Wind Industry Growth and Economic Development....................... 2 Contents a.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSMISSION: Solving the Dilemma
    FeBRUARY2010 FeATUReS Company Profile: Parkline, Inc. Gathering Blade Span Data A New Direction for Turbine Gearing Cool System, Hot Results Free Money for Wind Developers Eliminating Uncertainty with Sodar A Greener Wind Farm TRANSMISSION: SOlvINgThedIleMMA departments Logistics—BDP Project Logistics Construction—Hayward Baker Maintenance— SKF Technology—SandiaNational Laboratories Q&A: Kenneth Westrick 3TIER FEBRUARY 2010 FEATURES COMPANYPROFILE 24 PARKLINE, INC. BY RUSS WILLCUTT This renowned manufacturer of prefabricated electrical buildings can provide you with structures designed to meet your exact job specifications. GATHERING BLADE 26 SPAN DATA BY JOSH UNDErwOOD Compiling a complete range of data is the only way to determine whether a potential wind-farm site is viable and will produce as desired. A NEW DIRECTION FOR 30 TURBINE GEARING BY CHRISTER RICHT In this article Sandvik Coromant reports on tooling developments that are driving progress in cutting gears for wind turbines. SOLVING THE 34 TRANSMISSION DILEMMA BY PAUL KAISER While transmission continues to be a major impediment to getting more wind power to the market, several important developments were made in the past few years. COOL SYSTEM, 40 HOT RESULT BY DALE THOMPSON New cooling system from Parker provides significant advantages to wind turbines by offering greater performance in a smaller package. FREE MONEY FOR 44 WIND DEVELOPERS BY JESSICA A. GRAF AND JUSTIN B. MEAD Allow these experts to guide you through the grant funds available to wind developers through The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. ELIMINATING UNCERTAINTY 50 WITH SODAR BY SUSAN GIORDANO Just as the wind industry itself continues to evolve, remote sensing has truly come of age, eliminating the uncertainty often associated with wind-assessment studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Options for Clean Air and Sustainable Energy in Texas
    Policy Options for Clean Air and Sustainable Energy in Texas January 2009 Prepared by: Daniel Cohan Birnur Buzcu-Guven Daniel Hodges-Copple Rice University Dan Bullock Ross Tomlin Houston Advanced Research Center Prepared for: Texas Business for Clean Air ii Acknowledgements The authors thankfully acknowledge the valuable contributions of Mr. Oviea Akpotaire. iii This page intentionally left blank. iv Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................VII LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................... VIII POLICY OPTIONS FOR CLEAN AIR AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY IN TEXAS: ..................................X EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................X CHAPTER 1 ................................................................................................................................................................1 THE AIR QUALITY CHALLENGE IN TEXAS ....................................................................................................1 1.1 OZONE ................................................................................................................................................................1 1.1.1 Ozone formation .........................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Regional Economic Impacts of Renewable Energy Sources
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 93 (2018) 35–51 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rser Assessing the regional economic impacts of renewable energy sources – A T literature review ⁎ Simon Jennichesa,b, a Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands b Rhine-Ruhr-Institute for Social Research and Policy Consulting at the University of Duisburg-Essen, Heinrich-Lersch-Straße 15, 47057 Duisburg, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The transition of the global energy system is one of the main trends that offers opportunities as well as challenges Regional impacts of renewable energy for the economy. Most literature evaluates the impact of that transition at a national level. That view is broa- Economic impact assessment dened towards a regional scale. Due to the lower energy density of many renewable energy sources, renewable Economy and renewable energy energy generation will be more decentralised, leading to potentially significant changes in the regional economy Literature review renewable energy and when transitioning to a renewable energy system. In this paper the current literature and methods of assessing economics regional economic impacts of a transition to renewable energy generation is reviewed. The findings suggest an Guideline impact assessment fi Renewable energy sources overall need to clearly de ne the topics, such as technologies, that are assessed and the evaluated time period. A guideline for a regional impact assessment is provided, focusing on the suitability of applied impact assessment methods (employment ratios, supply chain analyses, input-output models, and computable general equilibrium models).
    [Show full text]
  • Skookumchuck Wind Energy Project Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan and Incidental Take Permit for Marbled Murrelet, Bald Eagle
    Skookumchuck Wind Energy Project Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan and Incidental Take Permit for Marbled Murrelet, Bald Eagle, and Golden Eagle Lewis and Thurston Counties, Washington Draft Environmental Impact Statement Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Washington Field Office 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 102 Lacey, Washington 98503 November 2018 Estimated Total Costs Associated with Developing and Producing this EIS $629,000 COVER SHEET Title of Proposed Action: Skookumchuck Wind Energy Project Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan and Incidental Take Permit for Marbled Murrelet, Bald Eagle, and Golden Eagle. Subject: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Lead Agency: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service County/State: Lewis and Thurston Counties, Washington Abstract: The Skookumchuck Wind Energy Project, LLC (Applicant), a wholly owned subsidiary of Renewable Energy Systems, has determined that operations and maintenance activities associated with the Skookumchuck Wind Energy Project (Project) have the potential to result in take of marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), listed as federally threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, and bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA)—collectively, the Covered Species—and is seeking an incidental take permit (ITP) pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA, as amended (16 United States Code [USC] 1531 et seq., 1539) for take of the Covered Species that could result from Project operations and maintenance activities. Doing so would also confer take authorization as required under the BGEPA (16 USC 668–668c, 50 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 22.261) without the need for a separate bald and golden eagle permit.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Site-Wide Environmental Assessment Department of Energy's National Wind Technology Center Golden, Colorado at the Nati
    Final Site‐Wide Environmental Assessment Department of Energy’s National Wind Technology Center Golden, Colorado at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory DOE/EA‐1914 May 2014 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DOE/EA-1914 i May 2014 Department of Energy Golden Field Office 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SITE-WIDE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY’S NATIONAL WIND TECHNOLOGY CENTER, GOLDEN, COLORADO AT THE NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY DOE/EA-1914 AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) SUMMARY: DOE is proposing an action to continue management and operation of the National Wind Technology Center (NWTC) site in Golden, Colorado at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), and to potentially implement the following improvements: Increase and enhance research and support capabilities by constructing new facilities, modifying existing facilities, upgrading infrastructure, and performing site maintenance activities in the Research and Support Facilities areas (Zone 1 and Zone 2) Increase site use and density by adding wind turbines, meteorological towers and associated infrastructure, and grid storage test equipment at existing and proposed field test sites (Zone 2) Expand NWTC’s power capacity to 50 megawatts (MW) The action described above is hereinafter referred to as the Proposed Action. The purpose of the Proposed Action is to support DOE’s mission in the research and development (R&D) of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies by providing enhanced facilities and infrastructure to adequately support state-of-the-art wind energy research and testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan
    Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan For Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation Prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc. and Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. March 17, 2009 Table of Contents Resolution No. 2009-51 of Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation to adopt CFHMP .............. Letter of Approval for CFHMP from Washington State Department of Ecology I. Overview ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 I. A. Authority and Funding............................................................................................................................ 1 I. B. Plan Development Process ................................................................................................................... 1 I. B. 1. Public Meetings and Advisory Group ........................................................................................... 2 I. B. 2. Determination of Need for Flood Control Work: Short-term and Long-term Goals of the CFHMP .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 I. B. 3. Project Approach ............................................................................................................................. 4 I. B. 4. Plan Organization ............................................................................................................................ 5 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Chehalis River Basin Draft Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan
    DRAFT Chehalis River Basin Draft Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan May 2010 Prepared for: Prepared by: Chehalis River Basin Flood Authority ESA Adolfson Chehalis River Basin Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan ACRONYMS AF acre feet BA Biological Assessment BE Biological Evaluation BMC Bucoda Municipal Code BMP Best Management Practice CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFHMP Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan CFR Code of Federal Regulations CFRP Centralia Flood Reduction Project cfs cubic feet per second CMC Chehalis Municipal Code COE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Corps U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CMZ Channel Migration Zone CRS Community Rating System CTED Community, Trade, and Economic Development CWA Clean Water Act CWPO Closed Without Payment DOE Department of Ecology DST Decision Support Tool Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology EIS Environmental Impact Statement EO Executive Order EPA Environmental Protection Agency ER Emergency Response ESA Endangered Species Act ESSB Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill FCAAP Flood Control Assistance Account Program FEMA Federal Emergency Management Association FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FHWA Federal Highway Administration FIA Federal Insurance Administration FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map FMA Flood Mitigation Assistant grant program FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact GI General Investigation GIS Geographic Information System GMA Growth Management Act GO General Obligation HEC-RAS Hydrologic Engineering Centers River Analysis System HHS Human Health
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact Analysis for Sapphire Sky Wind Farm in Mclean County, Illinois
    Economic Impact Analysis for Sapphire Sky Wind Farm in McLean County, Illinois February 2021 David G. Loomis, Ph.D. Dr. David G. Loomis is About the Professor of Economics at Illinois State University and Author Co-Founder of the Center for Renewable Energy. He has over 10 years of experience in the renewable energy field and has performed economic analyses at the county, region, state and national levels for utility-scale wind and solar generation. He has served as a consultant for Apex Clean Energy, Clean Line Energy Partners, EDF Renewables, E.ON Climate and Renewables, Geronimo Energy, Invenergy, J-Power, the National Renewable Energy Laboratories, Ranger Power, State of Illinois, Tradewind, and others. He has testified on the economic impacts of energy projects before the Illinois Commerce Commission, Missouri Public Service Commission, Illinois Senate Energy and Environment Committee and numerous county boards. Dr. Loomis is a widely recognized expert and has been quoted in the Wall Street Journal, Forbes Magazine, Associated Press, and Chicago Tribune as well as appearing on CNN. Dr. Loomis has published over 25 peer-reviewed articles in leading energy policy and economics journals. He has raised and managed over $7 million in grants and contracts from government, corporate and foundation sources. He received the 2011 Department of Energy’s Midwestern Regional Wind Advocacy Award and the 2006 Best Wind Working Group Award. Dr. Loomis received his Ph.D. in economics from Temple University in 1995. I. Executive Summary of Findings ........................................................... 1 II. Wind Industry Growth and Economic Development........................ 2 Table of a. United States Wind Industry Growth ............................................
    [Show full text]