China's „Gold” Vs. Romania's „Rare Earth Elements”
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
B&L Business & Leadership Nr. 2 - 2011, pp. 7-15 ISSN 2069-4814 RARE EARTH ELEMENT S CHINA’S „GOLD” VS. ROMANIA’S „RARE EARTH ELEMENTS” Author ∗ Oana Maria Stnculescu Abstract: When I begin to speak about the rare earths issue I can not ignore to mention the impact that this subject had on me. I never thought that the underlying groups of Mendeleev’s periodic table, the existence of which I didn’t know, could be so important and desired internationally. The equation became complicated when we added the independent variable: China, on which all the rare earth trade depends. So, in my research I tried to emphasize the importance of these “future technological elements” through prices, calculating the market concentration level in America, Canada and Australia through the concentration rate and Herfindahl- Hirschman index. I have reserved the conclusions to an interesting parallel, and their structure will bring to light some unbelievable, but true information, guaranteed by the specialists from the field. Keywords: market concentration, concentration ratio, Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, royalties, coherent policies 1. Introduction “Avatar”, James Cameron’s movie, made reference to those metals called “unobtainium” which were exploited on a planet, Pandora, inhabited by the Na'vi. These minerals were very expensive (20 million dollars / kilogram) and represented the future. The reality, however, is not far from this scenario. Rare earths are triggering a big interest from all nations, representing the future materials for modern technologies. So, in my attempt to demonstrate the importance of these elements which are the future of technology and one of ∗ Assistant PhD, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Babe-Bolyai University; e-mail: [email protected] 8 Oana Maria Stnculescu China’s strengths, is inevitable an approach of the market by calculating the rare earth indicators, and also the situation of prices of these elements.. In a time when the world’s appetite for rare earth oxides is growing, supply is limited. China, which supplies 97% of these items, reduced exports of rare earths by 50% in the last two years. One of the reasons why China has resorted to this was keeping a large percentage of them in order to produce other high value products such as rare earth metals, alloys and magnets. In addition, illegal mining in southern China has a destructive impact on the environment. As the demand for rare earth oxides exceeded supply, oxide prices and rare earth metals have soared. One of the oldest rare earth, samarium, grew by 1120% in price over the last six months. Sellers have insignificant quantities available for sale and buyers are more concerned with finding stable and secure sources of supply being price sensitive. In response to the price increases, several countries such as Korea, Japan and even China have announced the plan to create strategic stocks of rare earths. 2. The evolution of rare earth prices Rare earths are not exchange traded, so prices are less volatile and are not subject to speculation. Prices are based on off-take contracts. Most rare earths deposits contain 97% light earths (Light Rare Earth Elements). Deposits with a high proportion of heavy rare earths are scarce. Consequently, the heavy rare earths are more valuable. From 1 April 2011, the Chinese government decided to apply a tax rate of 60 yuan per tonne of light rare earths and 30 yuan for the heavy rare earths. China said the heavy rare earths resources are finite and that they are enough for merely another 15 years. In terms of rare earth operation overseas, this is difficult to execute because the beginning of the operation is very long and the expertise is limited in the rest of the world. Global supply and demand balance is not in equilibrium, the demand is much higher than the supply, and this problem becomes more acute given that China announced its refusal to export. It’s good to know that the prices of rare earth have little impact on final product price, and recyclability of products composed of rare earths is limited. In 2006, prices of rare earth were as follows: cerium - $ 40 / kg ($ 40.000 / tonne), lanthanum - $ 30 / kg ($ 30.000 / tonne), ytterbium - $ 400 / kg ($ 400.000 / tonne), yttrium - $ 50 / kg ($ 50.000 / tonne), scandium - $ 70 / kg ($ 70.000 / tonne). In 2003, 85.000 tonnes of rare earths have been delivered worldwide, worth 500 million dollars, which meant that in 2003, a tonne of rare earths costs $ 5.882,35. This year, sales are expected to increase to 125.000 tonnes, worth about $ 2 billion. After some simple calculations, it appears that in 2011 a tonne of rare earths is worth nearly triple, about $ 16.000. China`s "Gold" vs. Romania`s "Rare Earth Elements" 9 Informative note: Suppose a multinational company that manufactures wind turbines. A single turbine takes approximately 0.27 tons of rare earths per megawatt. For a 5 MW wind turbine 1.35 tons of rare earths are required. Taking into account the price of a tonne for the year 2011, $ 16.000, it appears that the company is supplying these raw materials that costs 21.600 $ to manufacture only a single 5 MW wind turbines. Below we have a five-year prices evolution for Dysprosium (heavy) and Neodymium (light). Date Range: August 2004 – August 2009 Source: “Rare Earth Elements and the Green Energy Economy”, Avalon Rare Metals Inc. From this figure we can see significant price differences between heavy rare earth (Heavy Rare Earth Element), namely Dysprosium and one light (Light Rare Earth Element), Neodymium. If in February 2004, a kilogram of neodymium costs about $ 9, a kilogram of dysprosium costs $ 50. One kilogram of neodymium has come to cost only $ 50 in 2007, when a kilogram of dysprosium worth almost $ 120. In 2010, a kilogram of neodymium costs $ 20 and one of dysprosium costs 142 dollars. Toyota uses for each Prius model one kilogram of neodymium and ten of lanthanum. In September 2010 it manufactured and sold over two million units, i.e. 40 million dollars needed to buy only the necessary amount of neodymium for the production models, and China has provided 2.000 tonnes of neodymium to Japan from the total production. I asked myself the following question: if dysprosium is so rare, resources being relatively limited, why in 2010, its price fell compared with 2008 instead of increasing? And also why Neodymium prices fell from $ 45 per kilogram in 2008 to $ 20 in 2010? Mentioning that these are the prices at which China exported rare earths, given that global demand may not be fully satisfied. I, however, think that there is an 10 Oana Maria Stnculescu explanation. China wants, in the near future, to attract more multinational companies on its territory, because they are closer to sources of rare earth, and this is made through the pricing policy. Table 1. The prices of selected rare earths oxides on 22 Nov 2010 were: Rare Earth Oxide Price ($/kg) Cerium 59 - 62 Dysprosium 284 – 305 Erbium 84 – 94 Europium 585 – 605 Gadolinium 43 – 46 Lanthanum 55 – 58 Neodymium 79 – 83 Praseodymium 71 – 80 Samarium 33 – 35 Terbium 595 – 615 Yttrium 53 – 70 Table 2. The prices of selected rare earths metals on 22 Nov 2010 were: Rare Earth Metal Price ($/kg) Cerium 43 – 55 Dysprosium 372 – 415 Europium 710 – 800 Gadolinium 53 – 56 Lanthanum 42 – 46 Neodymium 97 – 100 Praseodymium 84 – 106 Samarium 44,5 – 53 Terbium 750 – 792 Yttrium 61 – 63 Source: www.metal-pages.com and www.asianmetal.com About lanthanum oxide prices, cerium and neodymium we can say that during 2001 - 2006 they showed insignificant increases, neodymium did not exceed $ 5 per kilogram, in 2007 reached $ 30 per kilogram and in 2010 a kilogram of neodymium costs $ 80. Price evolution of cerium and lanthanum are similar, which is upward since 2010, when one kilogram of cerium costs 59 dollars and one kilogram of lanthanum costs $ 55. Europium, terbium and dysprosium oxide have had fluctuating prices compared with other oxides in the range of analysis from 2001 to 2010. For example, the price of dysprosium oxide has increased since 2005, reaching $ 101 per kilogram in 2008 and about $ 300 in 2010. This is due to the explosion of technologies, especially those green which require a large part of these rare earths. Terbium oxide’s highest price was recorded in 2010 amounting to $ 615 per kilogram. The figure shows the evolution of prices being moderate by the end of this decade and the surge in prices is due to the increasing of global demand and the reducing of Chinese exports. The price surge affects not China`s "Gold" vs. Romania`s "Rare Earth Elements" 11 only the rare earths for which there are forecasted supply gaps, but also rare items such as cerium. For 2011, light rare earth prices differ significantly from those of heavy rare earth. Thus, lanthanum oxide used in rechargeable batteries cost $ 95 / kilogram, praseodymium oxide used in magnets costs 155 dollars / kilogram, and the most expensive light rare earth oxide is neodymium oxide, used in lasers, magnets costs 172 dollars / kilogram. On the other hand, europium oxide used in the manufacture of television costs 830 dollars / kilogram, terbium oxide used to manufacture weapons costs 820 dollars / kilogram and oxide dysprosium costs 522 dollars / kilogram. There is a significant price growth compared with 2010. In the pricing of rare earths, China has something to say, because it has the largest amount of these elements in the world. The prices are not outcomes of the market, made on the relationship between supply and demand, and on the equilibrium price we can not talk because there is no equality between the quantity of goods demanded and the quantity of goods offered.