Hydrothermal Explosion Craters in Yellowstone National Park

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hydrothermal Explosion Craters in Yellowstone National Park L. J. P. MUFFLER D. E. WHITE U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025 A. H. TRUESDELL Hydrothermal Explosion Craters in Yellowstone National Park ABSTRACT proposed mechanism is reasonable. The sizes of craters expected in various rock types Hydrothermal explosions are produced correspond with those observed. when water contained in near-surface rock at temperatures as high as perhaps 250°C flashes INTRODUCTION to steam and violently disrupts the confining While preparing a geologic map of Lower rock. These explosions are due to the same Geyser Basin in 1966, we recognized two instability and chain reaction mechanism as large craters, each about 0.4 mi in mean geyser eruptions but are so violent that a diameter. Subsequently, other U.S. Geologi- large proportion of solid debris is expelled cal Survey personnel recognized similar craters along with water and steam. at a number of localities in Yellowstone Park Hydrothermal explosions are not a type of (Fig. 1). We have studied these other craters volcanic eruption. Although the required only in reconnaissance, and almost all the energy probably comes from a deep igneous data in this paper were obtained from the source, this energy is transferred to the sur- two craters in Lower Geyser Basin. None of face by circulating meteoric water rather than these craters has been mentioned previously by magma. The energy is stored as heat in in the geologic literature, although the small hot water and rock within a few hundred feet lakes within the Twin Buttes crater of Lower of the surface. Geyser Basin are labeled "crater lakes" on At least ten hydrothermal explosion craters, the Lower Geyser Basin map of the Hayden ranging in diameter from a few tens of feet to Sutvey (Hayden, 1883). about 5000 ft, have been recognized in Yel- We are grateful to R. L. Christiansen, G. lowstone National Park. Eight of these craters M. Richmond, and H. A. Waldrop for data are in hydrothermally cemented glacial de- on craters in the northern and eastern parts posits; two are in Pleistocene ash-flow tuff. of the Park and for many helpful discussions Each is surrounded by a rim composed of of the volcanic and glacial aspects of the debris derived from the crater. Juvenile vol- problem. We also acknowledge the mapping canic ejecta are absent, and there is no evi- and collaboration of our colleague R. O. dence of impact. Fournier, and the reviews of R. S. Fiske, D Geologic relations at the Pocket Basin J. Milton, R. F. Roy, and D. L. Blackstone. crater establish that the explosion there took place during the waning stages of early Pine- HYDROTHERMAL EXPLOSIONS dale Glaciation. This association with ablat- The craters discussed here were not formed ing ice suggests that an ice-dammed lake by volcanic activity or by impact but by a existed over a hydrothermal system at the mechanism we term "hydrothermal explo- Pocket Basin site and that the hydrothermal sion." A hydrothermal explosion takes place explosion was triggered by the abrupt de- when water contained in near-surface rocks crease in confining pressure consequent to at temperatures as high as perhaps 250°C sudden draining of the lake. Most of the flashes to steam and violently disrupts the other explosion craters in Yellowstone Park confining rocks, expelling solid material as could have been triggered in the same manner. well as water and steam. Craters formed by Calculations of energy available in Yellow- hydrothermal explosions range in diameter stone hot-spring systems and of energy re- from a few tens of feet to at least 4000 ft. quired to form craters indicate that the Hydrothermal explosions are relatively un- Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 82, p. 723-740, 10 figs., March 1971 723 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/82/3/723/3432828/i0016-7606-82-3-723.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 MUFFLER AND OTHERS—HYDROTHERMAL EXPLOSION CRATERS common; thermal systems commonly dissi- tent) (White, 1967, p. 651-652). This insta- pate their heat by geyser and hot-spring bility produces hot-spring flow, geyser activ- action rather than by major eruptions or rock ity, and hydrothermal explosions, depending and water. on the physical characteristics of the system. In hydrothermal systems such as those of If near-surface permeability is relatively Yellowstone National Park, temperatures high, the instability of the hot-water column much higher than surface boiling can be is counteracted by convection, circulation, achieved at very shallow depths, because of surface boiling, and surface discharge as hot the increase of boiling point with pressure. springs. But if near-surface permeability is In many high-temperature water systems, the decreased by deposition of hydrothermal temperatures are controlled by the two-phase minerals or by a cap rock, steady-state proc- boundary between water and steam (Fig. 2). esses are not effective in dispersing the excess Such systems are inherently unstable because energy of high-temperature inflow, and geyser relatively low-temperature water (high in activity will result. density) is situated above high-temperature A geyser periodically erupts a turbulent water (low in density but high in energy con- mixture of water and vapor (White, 1967, JIO/OO' Figure 1. Map of Yellowstone National Park. Locations of hydrothermal explosion craters indicated by stars. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/82/3/723/3432828/i0016-7606-82-3-723.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 CRATERS IN LOWER GEYSER BASIN 725 Temperature in °C take place at the same locality, but much time 50 100 150 is necessary to replenish the expended energy. We choose to designate this cratering mechanism as "hydrothermal explosion" rather than "hydrothermal eruption" in order to emphasize the distinctions from geyser Boiling point eruptions. "Hydrothermal eruption" is used curve under as a general term encompassing both hydro- hydrostatic thermal explosions and geyser eruptions. pressure Hydrothermal explosions have been re- ported from Lake City, California (White, 1955), Steamboat Springs, Nevada (White, 1955; White and others, 1964), Waiotapu, Temperature measured ot hole bottom during drilling New Zealand (Lloyd, 1959), and Tuscany, Italy (Marinelli, 1969). In addition, the 1957 eruption on Iwo Jima (Corwin and Foster, 1959) and the 1951-1952 activity at Nobon- betsu, Japan (Fukutomi and Fujiki, 1953), YELLOWSTONE No. 3 may also have been hydrothermal explosions. At Lake City, California, a previously incon- spicuous group of hot springs suddenly erup- ted on March 1, 1951, as violent mud vol- Fugure 2. Graph showing temperatures in canoes that involved over 300,000 tons of U.S. Geological Survey research drill hole Y-3 mud (White, 1955). Approximately 20 acres (just west of the Pocket Basin explosion crater) were intensely cratered and disturbed, and controlled by the boiling point curve. The curve shows the boiling point of pure water fine debris was showered as far as 4 mi away. under the hydrostatic pressure of liquid water During the declining activity that continued everywhere at the boiling point, assuming water for several days, five centers of activity evolved level to be at the ground surface. During drill- from what initially had been a single major ing at depths greater than 250 ft, the hole center. exhibited positive well-head pressures, per- A hydrothermal explosion is not a volcanic mitting temperatures to be slightly above the eruption, because no magma is directly in- two-phase curve for hydrostatic pressure alone. volved. The energy required is brought from depth by upflowing hot water and is stored p. 642). The violent nature of a geyset erup- as heat in water and rocks within a few tion is due to flashing of water to steam hundred feet of the surface. In contrast, rhe throughout a column of water everywhere at energy for a volcanic eruption is carried the boiling point. When water at the top of directly from depth to the surface by magma such a column is removed (for example, by or by fluidized rock. The explosive nature of bailing) the effective weight of the column some volcanic eruptions may be due either decreases, steam forms and displaces water, to rapid exsolution and expansion of gas further reducing the confining pressure at from magma or to vaporization of sea water depth, and the resulting chain reaction leads or cool ground water contacted by the magma. immediately to geyser eruption. If geyser When ground water is affected, the eruption eruptions are sufficiently violent, they can is termed "phreatic" (Stearns and Macdonald, expel rock fragments and can, in time, gradu- 1946, p. 16). ally destroy the geyser channels and termi- nate geyser activity (White, 1967, p. 681 - 682). CRATERS IN LOWER GEYSER BASIN Hydrothermal explosions are due to the Lower Geyser Basin is a broad, nearly flat same instability and chain reaction mecha- valley about 7200 ft above sea level, sur- nism as are geyser eruptions, but are so violent rounded by rhyolite plateaus that rise 400 to that they disrupt the confining rocks and 1000 ft above the valley floor (Fig. 3). expel a large proportion of solid debris. Be- Rhyolite flows ranging in age from 120,000 cause of this disruptive action, hydrothermal to nearly 600,000 yrs (R. L. Christiansen and explosions do not have the short-term peri- J. D. Obradovich, 1969, written commun.) odicity of geysers. Successive explosions may crop out east of the basin and extend west- Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/82/3/723/3432828/i0016-7606-82-3-723.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 726 MUFFLER AND OTHERS-HYDROTHERMAL EXPLOSION CRATERS ward under the basin. The rhyolite flow that yrs B.P., according to Table 2 of Richmond, partly encircles Lower Geyser Basin on the 1965) are predominantly kame gravel and north, west, and south is even younger, prob- sand, with minor till and lacustrine deposits, ably about 90,000 yrs.
Recommended publications
  • Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping
    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Yellowstone National Park This document summarizes the results of a geologic resource evaluation scoping session that was held at Yellowstone National Park on May 16–17, 2005. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. In addition to GRD staff, participants included park staff and cooperators from the U.S. Geological Survey and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Participants of Yellowstone’s GRE Scoping Session Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Bob Volcanologist, USGS–Menlo Park 650-329-5201 [email protected] Christiansen Geologist/GRE Program GIS Lead, NPS Tim Connors 303-969-2093 [email protected] Geologic Resources Division Data Stewardship Coordinator, Greater Rob Daley 406-994-4124 [email protected] Yellowstone Network Supervisory Geologist, Yellowstone Hank Heasler 307-344-2441 [email protected] National Park Geologist, NPS Geologic Resources Bruce Heise 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division Cheryl Geologist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-2208 [email protected] Jaworowski Katie Geologist/Senior Research Associate, 970-586-7243 [email protected] KellerLynn Colorado State University Branch Chief, NPS Geologic Resources Carol McCoy 303-969-2096 [email protected] Division Ken Pierce Surficial Geologist, USGS–Bozeman 406-994-5085 [email protected] Supervisory GIS Specialist, Yellowstone Anne Rodman 307-344-7381 [email protected] National Park Shannon GIS Specialist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-7381 [email protected] Savage Monday, May 16, involved a welcome to Yellowstone National Park and an introduction to the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program, including status of reports and digital maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Postglacial Inflation-Deflation Cycles, Tilting, and Faulting in the Yellowstone E Caldera Based on Yellowstone Lake Shorelines
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications of the US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 2007 Postglacial Inflation-Deflation cles,Cy Tilting, and Faulting in the Yellowstone Caldera Based on Yellowstone Lake Shorelines Kenneth L. Pierce U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Kenneth P. Cannon U.S. Geological Survey Grant A. Meyer U.S. Geological Survey Matthew J. Trebesch U.S. Geological Survey Raymond D. Watts U.S. Geological Survey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgspubs Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Pierce, Kenneth L.; Cannon, Kenneth P.; Meyer, Grant A.; Trebesch, Matthew J.; and Watts, Raymond D., "Postglacial Inflation-Deflation cles,Cy Tilting, and Faulting in the Yellowstone Caldera Based on Yellowstone Lake Shorelines" (2007). Publications of the US Geological Survey. 78. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgspubs/78 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications of the US Geological Survey by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Postglacial Inflation-Deflation Cycles, Tilting, and Faulting in the Yellowstone E Caldera Based on Yellowstone Lake Shorelines By Kenneth L. Pierce, Kenneth P. Cannon, Grant A. Meyer, Matthew J. Trebesch, and Raymond D. Watts Chapter E of Integrated Geoscience Studies in the Greater Yellowstone Area— Volcanic, Tectonic, and Hydrothermal
    [Show full text]
  • Precontact Archeology in Yellowstone
    volume 18 • issue 1 • 2010 Precontact Archeology in Yellowstone Interview with Archeologist Ann Johnson A New View of Yellowstone’s Geyser Basins Science in Brief he value of Yellowstone National Park as a I would also like scientific laboratory as well as a public pleasuring to remind you of an- ground is reflected in the fact that the park hosts other forum for sci- Tmore than 200 researchers from various agencies, universi- ence in Yellowstone, the ties, and organizations each year. They produce hundreds upcoming 10th Biennial of papers, manuscripts, books, and book chapters on their Scientific Conference on work annually—a volume of information that is difficult the Greater Yellowstone NPS/HFC Commi to absorb. Yellowstone Science journal was started in 1992 to Ecosystem, “Questioning help report Yellowstone-based scientific research findings to Greater Yellowstone’s Future: researchers, park managers and staff, and the interested pub- Climate, Land Use, and SS io N lic. In each issue we feature articles written by researchers Invasive Species.” Information Colle Art ed from many disciplines—from art history to microbiology— on the conference can be found and distribute it to more than 3,500 readers as well as make on the Greater Yellowstone C it available online. Science Learning Center web- tio N A , , Since the inception of Yellowstone Science there have site (www.greateryellow- rti S been few changes to the journal. Yet with advances in tech- stonescience.org/gyesci- t Gil Co nology our audiences now receive even more information conf2010). Registration H e which is ever more widely available.
    [Show full text]
  • The Floor of Yellowstone Lake Is Anything but Quietâ•Flnew
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications of the US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 2007 The Floor of Yellowstone Lake is Anything but Quiet—New Discoveries from High-Resolution Sonar Imaging, Seismic- Reflection Profiling, and Submersible Studies Lisa A. Morgan U.S. Geological Survey Wayne C. Shanks III U.S. Geological Survey Kenneth L. Pierce U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] David A. Lovalvo U.S. Geological Survey Gregory K. Lee U.S. Geological Survey See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgspubs Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Morgan, Lisa A.; Shanks, Wayne C. III; Pierce, Kenneth L.; Lovalvo, David A.; Lee, Gregory K.; Webring, Michael W.; Stephenson, William J.; Johnson, Samuel Y.; Harlan, Stephen S.; Schulze, Boris; and Finn, Carol A., "The Floor of Yellowstone Lake is Anything but Quiet—New Discoveries from High-Resolution Sonar Imaging, Seismic- Reflection Profiling, and Submersible Studies" (2007). Publications of the US Geological Survey. 77. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgspubs/77 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications of the US Geological Survey by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Lisa A. Morgan, Wayne C. Shanks III, Kenneth L. Pierce, David A. Lovalvo, Gregory K. Lee, Michael W. Webring, William J. Stephenson, Samuel Y. Johnson, Stephen S. Harlan, Boris Schulze, and Carol A. Finn This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ usgspubs/77 The Floor of Yellowstone Lake is Anything but Quiet—New Discoveries from D High-Resolution Sonar Imaging, Seismic- Reflection Profiling, and Submersible Studies By Lisa A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrothermal Activity and Volcanic Gases in Yellowstone
    This presentation has links to extra content embedded in the slides – best viewed in Presentation Mode! This presentation focuses on hydrothermal activity and volcanic gases in Yellowstone. First, you will view a seven minute video about volcanoes and hydrothermal explosions. To watch it, click anywhere on this slide. Then, you’ll examine a few maps to see where Yellowstone National Park is and its significant features—geological as well as practical ones like roads and villages. Finally, you’ll learn about hydrothermal systems in Yellowstone while your teammates learn more about earthquakes and the area’s eruption history. The link to the video takes you to the American Museum of Natural History’s Science Bulletin: “Monitoring the Fire Below.” https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFe- VSf-TQ8 Retrieved 5 November 2014. (Search for “monitoring fire below youtube.”) 1 Yellowstone lies partially in three states -- Montana, Idaho and Wyoming. Much of Yellowstone is a large crater (a “caldera”) that is surrounded by cliffs. The cliffs are topped by lava flows. This picture was taken from the top of a lava flow. The green bluffs below the mountains are the rim of the caldera. In the foreground are two lava flows. Photo by Bob Smith, University of Utah. Accessed from National Science Foundation: Discovery. “Yellowstone Rising.” http:// www.nsf.gov/discoveries/ disc_images.jsp? cntn_id=110651&org=NSF Retrieved 27 December 2011. Map from National Park Service: “Yellowstone Location Map.” http:// www.nps.gov/features/yell/ interactivemap/yelllocationmap.htm Retrieved 27 December 2011. 2 This image shows that the region is mountainous, but there is more subdued topography within most of the national park.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Sublacustrine Hydrothermal Vent Fluids on the Geochemistry of Yellowstone Lake
    The Influence of Sublacustrine Hydrothermal Vent Fluids on the F Geochemistry of Yellowstone Lake By Laurie S. Balistrieri, Wayne C. Shanks, III, Russell L. Cuhel, Carmen Aguilar, and J. Val Klump Chapter F of Integrated Geoscience Studies in the Greater Yellowstone Area— Volcanic, Tectonic, and Hydrothermal Processes in the Yellowstone Geoecosystem Edited by Lisa A. Morgan U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1717 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................173 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................173 Acknowledgments .....................................................................................................................................174 Study Area...................................................................................................................................................174 Methods.......................................................................................................................................................175 Field Methods ....................................................................................................................................175 Laboratory Methods .........................................................................................................................177
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Floor of Yellowstone Lake: New Discoveries from High-Resolution Sonar Imaging, Seismic-Reflection Profiling, and Submersible Studies
    Mapping the Floor of Yellowstone Lake: New Discoveries from High-Resolution Sonar Imaging, Seismic-Reflection Profiling, and Submersible Studies L. A. Morgan, W. C. Shanks III, D. Lovalvo, M. Webring, G. Lee, W. J. Stephenson, and S. Y. Johnson “…we arrived at the summit of the first ridge…It was a pretty steep climb to the top of it, over a volcanic sand composed of broken down obsidian which composed the only rocks around us.” —Albert Peale, mineralogist, U.S. Geological Survey, Hayden Survey, August 6, 1871. Abstract Recently completed multi-beam sonar-imaging and seismic-reflection sur- veys of the northern, West Thumb, and central basins of Yellowstone Lake pro- vide insight into post-caldera volcanism and active hydrothermal processes occurring in a large lake environment above a cooling magma chamber. High- resolution mapping of the lake floor reveals an irregular lake bottom covered with dozens of features directly related to hydrothermal, tectonic, volcanic, and sedimentary processes. Newly mapped rhyolitic lava flows that underlie much of Yellowstone Lake exert fundamental control on lake geology, basin bathyme- try, and localization of hydrothermal vent sites. Imaged and identified features include over 150 hydrothermal vent sites, several very large (>500 m diameter) and many small hydrothermal explosion craters (~1-200 m diameter), elongate fissures cutting post-glacial (<12 ka) sediments, siliceous hydrothermal spires as tall as 8 m, sublacustrine landslide deposits, deformed lacustrine sediments associated with domal structures and hydrothermal vents, submerged former shorelines, and a recently active graben, all occurring within the southeast mar- gin of the 0.640-Ma Yellowstone caldera.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic, Hydrothermal, and Glacial Activity in the Region
    A Field-Trip Guide to © fl Tfv^ "Tl /TTMTTi <5~1 \W &T} TP r 11 (IP illl dill IT dill n Volcanic, Hydrothermal, and Glacial Activity in the Region - OCT 0 6 1994 i£»~ DEPOSITORY ITEMS WA ^(&3/ffifa U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2099 AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current- year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single all of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Docu­ copies of Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of ments.
    [Show full text]
  • Track of the Yellowstone Hotspot: Young and Ongoing Geologic Processes from the Snake River Plain to the Yellowstone Plateau and Tetons
    FLD010-l.morgan 2nd pgs page 1 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 10 2008 Track of the Yellowstone hotspot: Young and ongoing geologic processes from the Snake River Plain to the Yellowstone Plateau and Tetons L.A. Morgan* U.S. Geological Survey, 973 Federal Center, PO Box 25046, Denver, Colorado 80225-0046, USA K.L. Pierce* U.S. Geological Survey, P.O. Box 173492, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717-3492, USA W.C. Pat Shanks* U.S. Geological Survey, 973 Federal Center, PO Box 25046, Denver, Colorado 80225-0046, USA ABSTRACT This fi eld trip highlights various stages in the evolution of the Snake River Plain– Yellowstone Plateau bimodal volcanic province, and associated faulting and uplift, also known as the track of the Yellowstone hotspot. The 16 Ma Yellowstone hotspot track is one of the few places on Earth where time-transgressive processes on conti- nental crust can be observed in the volcanic and tectonic (faulting and uplift) record at the rate and direction predicted by plate motion. Recent interest in young and possible renewed volcanism at Yellowstone along with new discoveries and synthesis of previous studies, i.e., tomographic, deformation, bathymetric, and seismic surveys, provide a framework of evidence of plate motion over a mantle plume. This 3-day trip is organized to present an overview into volcanism and tecto- nism in this dynamically active region. Field trip stops will include the young basaltic Craters of the Moon, exposures of 12–4 Ma rhyolites and edges of their associated collapsed calderas on the Snake River Plain, and exposures of faults which show an age progression similar to the volcanic fi elds.
    [Show full text]
  • Documented in New Zealand Hydrothermal Systems ( Jones and Renaut 1996; Jones Et Al
    xÎ Þ`ÀÌ iÀ>Ê6iÌÊÕ`Ã]Ê-ViÕÃÊÞ`ÀÌ iÀ>Ê i«ÃÌÃ]Ê>`Ê Þ`ÀÌ iÀ>ÞÊÌiÀi`Ê-i`iÌÃÊÊ9iÜÃÌiÊ>i 7#0AT3HANKS )))1*\,ISA!-ORGAN1\ ,AURIE"ALISTRIERI2\*EFFREY#!LT 53'EOLOGICAL3URVEY $ENVER&EDERAL#ENTER #/ 53'EOLOGICAL3URVEY 5NIVERSITYOF7ASHINGTON3CHOOLOF/CEANOGRAPHY 3EATTLE $EPARTMENTOF'EOLOGICAL3CIENCES 5NIVERSITYOF-ICHIGAN !NN!RBOR #ORRESPONDING!UTHOR 53'EOLOGICAL3URVEY $ENVER&EDERAL#ENTER $ENVER #/ 0HONE%MAILPSHANKS USGSGOV x{ "/ ,Ê ""9Ê Ê " -/,9Ê Ê9 "7-/" Ê /" Ê*, -/, / 3TABLEISOTOPICδ$ANDδ/ DATAINDICATEABOUTTOTALEVAPORATIVECONCENTRATIONHASOCCURREDIN9ELLOWSTONE,AKE YET LAKEWATERSAREENRICHEDINDISSOLVED!S " #L #S 'E ,I -O 3B AND7BYATLEASTANORDER OF MAGNITUDERELATIVETOTHE mOW WEIGHTEDCOMPOSITIONOFINmOWINGSTREAMS7ECONCLUDETHATLAKEWATERISAMIXTUREOFINmOWINGSURFACEWATERAND HYDROTHERMALSOURCEmUIDTHATISSTRONGLYENRICHEDIN#LANDOTHERELEMENTS7EESTIMATETHAT^OFTHETOTALHYDROTHERMAL mUXIN9ELLOWSTONE.ATIONAL0ARK9.0 OCCURSIN9ELLOWSTONE,AKE'EOCHEMICALANDMINERALOGICALSTUDIESOFHYDROTHERMAL DEPOSITSANDHYDROTHERMALLYALTEREDLAKESEDIMENTSVENTMUDS FROMTHEACTIVEORRECENTLYACTIVEVENTSITESONTHEmOOROF 9ELLOWSTONE,AKEINDICATETHATTHEIRFORMATIONISDUETOHYDROTHERMALmUIDQUENCHINGDURINGmOWTHROUGHSHALLOWCONDUITS ORTOMIXINGUPONEGRESSINTOCOLDBOTTOMWATERS3ILICEOUSPRECIPITATESFORMCONDUITSWITHINTHEUPPERMOSTSEDIMENTS TABULAR DEPOSITSALONGSEDIMENTARYLAYERS ANDSPIRESUPTOMTALL4HESEDEPOSITSAREENRICHEDIN!S #S (G -O 3B 4LAND73PIRES VENTDEPOSITS ANDCONDUITSCONTAINlLAMENTOUSMICROSTRUCTURESTHATPROBABLYREPRESENTSILICIlEDBACTERIA0ARTLYRECRYSTALLIZED ANDSILICIlEDDIATOMSAREABUNDANTINDEPOSITSBELOWTHESEDIMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Influences of Rhyolitic Lava Flows on Hydrothermal Processes In
    Σ yÕiViÃÊvÊ, ÞÌVÊ>Û>ÊÜÃÊÊÞ`ÀÌ iÀ>Ê*ÀViÃÃiÃÊÊ 9iÜÃÌiÊ>iÊ>`ÊÊÌ iÊ9iÜÃÌiÊ*>Ìi>ÕÊ ,ISA!-ORGAN \7#0AT3HANKS))) 53'EOLOGICAL3URVEY #ORRESPONDING!UTHOR 53'EOLOGICAL3URVEY $ENVER&EDERAL#ENTER "OX -3 $ENVER #/ 0HONE&AX%MAILLMORGAN USGSGOV ÎÓ "/ ,Ê ""9Ê Ê " -/,9Ê Ê9 "7-/" Ê /" Ê*, -/, / $ISCOVERIESFROMMULTI BEAMSONARMAPPINGANDSEISMIC REmECTIONSURVEYSOF9ELLOWSTONE,AKEPROVIDEDNEWINSIGHTINTO THERECENTGEOLOGICFORCESTHATHAVESHAPEDTHISLARGE HIGH ALTITUDELAKEATTHEACTIVEFRONTOFTHE9ELLOWSTONEHOTSPOT4HE 9ELLOWSTONE0LATEAUISSTRONGLYAFFECTEDBYYOUNGMY LARGE VOLUMEKM SILICICVOLCANISM ACTIVETECTONISM ANDACCOMPANYINGUPLIFT-APPING9ELLOWSTONE,AKEHASENHANCEDOURUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEEXTENTOFPOSTCALDERA COLLAPSE VOLCANISMANDACTIVEHYDROTHERMALPROCESSESOCCURRINGABOVEALARGEMAGMACHAMBERNOTONLYINTHELAKEBUTONTHE9ELLOWSTONE 0LATEAU 9ELLOWSTONE ,AKE HAS AN IRREGULAR BOTTOM COVERED WITH DOZENS OF FEATURES DIRECTLY RELATED TO TECTONIC VOLCANIC HYDROTHERMAL GLACIAL ANDSEDIMENTARYPROCESSESTHATARESIMILARTOTHOSEOBSERVEDONLANDWITHINTHE9ELLOWSTONE#ALDERA $ETAILEDBATHYMETRIC SEISMIC REmECTION ANDMAGNETICEVIDENCEREVEALSTHATRHYOLITICLAVAmOWSUNDERLIEMUCHOF9ELLOWSTONE ,AKE AND EXERT FUNDAMENTAL CONTROL ON LAKE MORPHOLOGY AND LOCALIZATION OF HYDROTHERMAL ACTIVITY IN THE NORTHERN 7EST 4HUMB ANDCENTRALLAKEBASINS4HESEOBSERVATIONSHAVELEDUSTOINVESTIGATEHOWON LANDRELATIONSHIPSINmUENCETHELOCATION OFHYDROTHERMALAREASINTHE9ELLOWSTONE#ALDERA7ECONCLUDETHELOCATIONSOFMANYTHERMALFEATURESINTHE9ELLOWSTONE #ALDERAAREDIRECTLYINmUENCEDBYTHEDISTRIBUTIONOFTHERHYOLITICLAVAmOWS iÞÊ7À`à >VÌÛiÊ`ivÀ>Ì Þ`ÀÌ iÀ>Ê«ÀViÃÃiÃ
    [Show full text]
  • Steam Explosions, Earthquakes, and Volcanic Eruptions—What's In
    U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY and the NATIONAL PARK SERVICE—OUR VOLCANIC PUBLIC LANDS Steam Explosions, Earthquakes, and Volcanic Eruptions— What’s in Yellowstone’s Future? ellowstone, one of the world’s Ylargest active volcanic systems, has produced several giant volcanic eruptions in the past few million years, as well as many smaller erup- tions and steam explosions. Although no eruptions of lava or volcanic ash have occurred for many thousands of years, future eruptions are likely. In the next few hundred years, hazards will most probably be limited to on- going geyser and hot-spring activity, occasional steam explosions, and moderate to large earthquakes. To better understand Yellowstone’s volcano and earthquake hazards and to help protect the public, the U.S. Geological Survey, the University of Utah, and Yellowstone National Park formed the Yellowstone Volcano Ob- servatory, which continuously moni- Midway Geyser Basin in Yellowstone National Park appears otherworldly tors activity in the region. beneath stormy skies. In the background, steam vigorously rises from the hot waters of Grand Prismatic Spring, known for its rainbow colors produced by thermophilic (“heat loving”) or- ganisms. Grand Prismatic is the largest hot spring in Yellowstone and the third largest in the world. This and other hydrothermal (hot water) features are among the main attractions for visitors to the park (inset photo). Each year, millions of visitors come These features are fueled by heat from a large reservoir of partially molten rock (magma), just a few miles to admire the hot springs and geysers of beneath Yellowstone, that drives one of the world’s largest volcanic systems.
    [Show full text]