DOCSLIB.ORG

Craig Gothic Bard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Craig Gothic Bard ‗OUR GOTHIC BARD‘: SHAKESPEARE AND APPROPRIATION 1764-1800 Steven Craig Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy English Studies University of Stirling January 2011 ii ABSTRACT In recent years, Gothic literary studies have increasingly acknowledged the role played by Shakespeare in authorial acts of appropriation. Such acknowledgement is most prominently stated in Gothic Shakespeares (eds. Drakakis and Townshend, 2008) and Shakespearean Gothic (eds. Desmet and Williams, 2009), both of which base their analyses of the Shakespeare-Gothic intersection on the premise that Shakespearean quotations, characters and events are valuable objects in their own right which mediate on behalf of the ‗present‘ concerns of the agents of textual appropriation. In light of this scholarship, this thesis argues the case for the presence of ‗Gothic Shakespeare‘ in Gothic writing during the latter half of the eighteenth century and, in doing so, it acknowledges the conceptual gap whereby literary borrowings were often denounced as acts of plagiarism. Despite this conceptual problem, it is possible to trace distinct ‗Gothic‘ Shakespeares that dismantle the concept of Shakespeare as a singular ineffable genius by virtue of a textual practice that challenges the concept of the ‗genius‘ Shakespeare as the figurehead of genuine emotion and textual authenticity. This thesis begins by acknowledging the eighteenth-century provenance of Shakespeare‘s ‗Genius‘, thereby distinguishing between the malevolent barbarian Gothic of Shakespeare‘s own time and the eighteenth-century Gothic Shakespeares discussed under the term ‗appropriation‘ . It proceeds to examine the Shakespeares of canonical Gothic writers (Horace Walpole, Ann Radcliffe and Matthew Lewis) as well as their lesser-known contemporaries (T.J. Horsley Curties and W.H. Ireland). For instance, Walpole conscripts Hamlet in order to mediate his experience of living in England after the death of his father, the first Prime Minister Robert Walpole. The thesis then argues for the centrality of Shakespeare in the Gothic romance‘s undercutting of the emergent discourses of emotion (or ‗passion‘), as represented by the fictions of Radcliffe and Lewis, before moving on to consider Curties‘s attempted recuperation – in Ethelwina; or, the House of Fitz-Auburne (1799) - of authentic passion, which is mediated through the authenticity apparatus of Edmond Malone‘s 1790 editions of Shakespeare‘s plays. It concludes with W.H. Ireland‘s dismantling of Malone‘s concept of the ‗authentic‘ Shakespeare through the contemporary iii transgressions of literary forgery and the evocation of an illicit Shakespeare in his first Gothic romance, The Abbess, also published in 1799. iv CONTENTS Acknowledgements and Declaration v Introduction 1 Shakespeare Among the Goths Chapter One 48 ‗Ghost. Adieu, Adieu‘: Horace Walpole, Hamlet, Macbeth, and the Limits of Shakespeare Appropriation Chapter Two 84 Countenancing Gothic Shakespeare: Physiognomy and Passion in Gothic Romance and Drama Chapter Three 139 Re-sexing ‗Woman‘: T.J. Horsley Curties‘s ‗Gothic Shakespeare‘ Chapter Four 182 (In)Authentic Shakespeare: The Case of W.H. Ireland Conclusion 220 ‗Shakspeare‘s Sanction‘ Bibliography 225 v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to extend my gratitude to the Department of English Studies and the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) for funding this doctoral dissertation. Their generous financial support enabled me to conduct research which would not otherwise have been undertaken. I am profoundly indebted to my supervisor, Dr Dale Townshend, for the time and encouragement he offered not only during my time as a doctoral student, but also as a Masters student on the MLitt in The Gothic Imagination. His knowledge of the Gothic and the eighteenth century inspired me throughout, and I am especially grateful for his patience and continued faith in me when times were tough. My second supervisor, Professor John Drakakis, must also be acknowledged for sharing with me his insights in all things Shakespearean during the early stages of the period of research. Finally I would like to thank my family for their unfailing love and support during the period of research. In particular, my parents, William and Helen Craig, supported me despite their own personal grief for recently departed loved ones. This thesis is dedicated to William McCourt Calder (1928-2009) and Dorothy Fletcher McGuire (1963-2009) DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my own work and that all critical and other sources (literary and electronic) have been specifically and properly acknowledges, as and when they occur in the body of my text. Signed: Date: 1 INTRODUCTION SHAKESPEARE AMONG THE GOTHS This, you see, is a short and commodious philosophy. Yet barbarians have their own, such as it is, if they are not enlightened by our reason. Shall we then condemn them unheard, or will it not be fair to let them have the telling of their own story? (Hurd, 1972, pp.194-195) Bishop Richard Hurd‘s ultimatum, in his Moral and Political Dialogues; with Letters on Chivalry and Romance (1762), to permit Gothic barbarians ‗the telling of their own story‘ or ‗condemn them unheard‘, resonates with the modern critic, whose exposure to the myriad stories on all things ‗Gothic‘ and ‗Shakespearean‘ is the effect of the ethical stance whereby hitherto silenced voices must be amplified if criticism is to justify its claim as a democratic mode. As critics such as Richard Wilson, David Salter and Allan Lloyd Smith have shown, Shakespeare and the Gothic are implicated in a number of stories, some of which co-exist in the same temporal space, while others are told as part of a continuum of Gothic discourse. For Wilson, what he dubs ‗Gothic Shakespeare‘ is ‗the uncanny prefiguration of the unpoliced revolutionary mob‘ in France at the end of the eighteenth century; more specifically, it is the discourse of the French philosopher Francois Marie Arouet de Voltaire, who maintained that Shakespeare‘s commitment in his plays to plebeian culture – with its fools, gravediggers, and the bard of Avon‘s own subversive commingling of tragedy and comedy – signalled the monstrous birth of Shakespeare as a democrat in a royal state (Wilson, 2007, pp.38-39). Moreover, for Wilson, this French ‗Gothic Shakespeare‘ has endured through Victor Hugo‘s ‗socialist‘ appropriation of 2 Shakespeare into the present day, where cultural theorists such as Jacques Derrida read into Shakespeare‘s plays the promise of the ‗democracy to come‘, albeit ushered in by the ineffable monstrosity of violence (Wilson, 2007, pp.68-73). If Gothic Shakespeare in France warns (Voltaire) or embraces (Derrida) authentic democracy, its English counterpart, by contrast, is signalled by its veneration of the rule of constitutional monarchy and its commitment to Protestantism. David Salter has argued that Matthew Lewis‘s referencing of Shakespeare in The Monk (1796) and Ann Radcliffe‘s deployment of Shakespeare in The Italian (1797) ‗authorize, legitimize and even shore up that sense of Englishness that defines itself not simply as Protestant, but as virulently anti-Catholic in character‘ (Salter, 2009, p.54). Thus Radcliffe rewrites the benevolent Friar Lawrence, from Romeo and Juliet, as the malignant monk purportedly responsible for the death of Ellena di Rosalba‘s guardian, Signora Bianchi, in what Salter terms as Radcliffe‘s ‗unquestioning assumption of Shakespeare‘s Protestantism‘ (Salter, 2009, p.56). Lewis‘s similarly unquestioning assumption of Shakespeare‘s sectarian affiliation is evidenced by Lewis‘s equation of the sexually depraved Catholic monk Ambrosio and Angelo in Measure for Measure. If during the so-called ‗first wave‘ of Gothic writing, Gothic was inscribed as the transcendental signified of things ‗English‘, ‗Protestant‘ and ‗Whiggish‘, the publication of Mary Shelley‘s Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818) advanced yet another story whereby, as Allan Lloyd Smith suggests in his citation of Paul Gilroy, Gothic discourse turned from its eighteenth- century identification with religiosity to the ‗dislocating dazzle of ―whiteness‖‘ (Smith, 2004, p.209). In the case of Frankenstein, Smith observes that the Monster, described in colonial discourse by Victor Frankenstein as the racial other, acquires an eloquent voice which ruptures the period‘s insistence on white superiority (Smith, 3 2004, p.210). Unlike the Catholic priests of Radcliffe and Lewis, the Monster not only speaks, but speaks in his own voice, thereby positing him as an intertextual echo of Caliban from The Tempest. The Shakespeares accounted for above attest to his endurance across history, but it is only Wilson‘s account that gestures at the possibility of a Shakespeare (or set of Shakespeares) that exists as the culmination of intentional literary appropriation. While Salter‘s essay acknowledges the act of appropriation, his commitment to the morality of highlighting historical difference leads him to conclude that Radcliffe fundamentally misunderstood Romeo and Juliet, further leading him to retract his acknowledgement of literary borrowing in favour of the thesis that Radcliffe‘s Shakespeare is the product of ‗unconscious ideological conditioning‘ (Salter, 2009, p.58). Smith‘s essay suggests a Shakespeare that recurs unconsciously, for his reference to Caliban functions merely as an allusion to the Monster‘s verbal skill that exceeds Mary Shelley‘s declared interest in Paradise Lost. While Shakespearean
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hints from Horace
    HINTS FROM HORACE INTRODUCTION BYRON AND HORACE: “the great little poet’s wrong”1 Byron refers to Horace more often than he does any other poet except Shakespeare. There is at once characteristic aptness and characteristic irony in this, for Horace was a kind of Roman Southey – with genius. Where Byron is far from scared about giving political offence to the establishment, Horace never even thinks of doing so – one of his longest verse-letters,2 and several of his Odes, are addressed in terms of respect, nay reverence, to the Emperor Augustus, and his Carmen Seculare (a title appropriated by Byron for The Age of Bronze, a poem the reverse of Caesarist) was commissioned by the Emperor himself. Horace is committed to the political status quo of his time and place. Byron would never write the English equivalent of Caelo tonantem credidimus Iovem Regnare; praesens divus habebitur Augustus adiectis Britannis Imperio gravibusque Persis.3 [We believe that Jove is king in heaven because we hear his thunders peal; Augustus shall be deemed a god on earth for adding to our empire the Britons and dread Parthians.] or, … ego nec tumultum nec mori per vim metuam tenente Caesare terras.4 [Neither civil strife nor death by violence will I fear, while Caesar holds the earth.] 1: Don Juan XIV, 77, 2. 2: Hor. Epis. II, i. 3: Hor. Od. III, v, 1-4. 4: Hor. Od. III, xiv , 14-16. Many more examples could be adduced, of Horace’s intense patriotism and Caesarism,5 a Caesarism all the more intense for being, like Southey’s conservatism, that of a turncoat, a renegado: for Horace had fought at Philippi on the side of Brutus and Cassius.
    [Show full text]
  • De Búrca Rare Books
    De Búrca Rare Books A selection of fine, rare and important books and manuscripts Catalogue 141 Spring 2020 DE BÚRCA RARE BOOKS Cloonagashel, 27 Priory Drive, Blackrock, County Dublin. 01 288 2159 01 288 6960 CATALOGUE 141 Spring 2020 PLEASE NOTE 1. Please order by item number: Pennant is the code word for this catalogue which means: “Please forward from Catalogue 141: item/s ...”. 2. Payment strictly on receipt of books. 3. You may return any item found unsatisfactory, within seven days. 4. All items are in good condition, octavo, and cloth bound, unless otherwise stated. 5. Prices are net and in Euro. Other currencies are accepted. 6. Postage, insurance and packaging are extra. 7. All enquiries/orders will be answered. 8. We are open to visitors, preferably by appointment. 9. Our hours of business are: Mon. to Fri. 9 a.m.-5.30 p.m., Sat. 10 a.m.- 1 p.m. 10. As we are Specialists in Fine Books, Manuscripts and Maps relating to Ireland, we are always interested in acquiring same, and pay the best prices. 11. We accept: Visa and Mastercard. There is an administration charge of 2.5% on all credit cards. 12. All books etc. remain our property until paid for. 13. Text and images copyright © De Burca Rare Books. 14. All correspondence to 27 Priory Drive, Blackrock, County Dublin. Telephone (01) 288 2159. International + 353 1 288 2159 (01) 288 6960. International + 353 1 288 6960 Fax (01) 283 4080. International + 353 1 283 4080 e-mail [email protected] web site www.deburcararebooks.com COVER ILLUSTRATIONS: Our front and rear cover is illustrated from the magnificent item 331, Pennant's The British Zoology.
    [Show full text]
  • Given a Free Rein? Representations of Power in the Stables at Houghton Hall, Norfolk, and John Wootton's Sir Robert Walpole Wi
    VIDES III JEMIMA HUBBERSTEY Given a free rein? Representations of power in the stables at Houghton Hall, Norfolk, and John Wootton’s Sir Robert Walpole with his Hunter and Groom When Sir Robert Walpole first rose to political power from humble origins, he had much to prove to the world. In order to consolidate his position as Prime Minister against the backdrop of the new Hanoverian dynasty, Walpole capitalised on extravagant displays of power, impressing political peers and local squires alike by inviting them for entertainment and hunting at his estate at Houghton Hall, Norfolk. This was hardly coincidental: although relatively unexplored in scholarship, historically, horses served as vehicles to showcase a man’s elite social standing and ability to govern. However, it was also important for Walpole to recognise the limits of his power in order to demonstrate that he was no threat to the monarchy. This study examines the stable architecture at Houghton Hall and the equestrian portrait of Walpole by John Wootton (1726) in order to demonstrate the extent to which equestrian representations could function as a metaphor for both power and submission, which is particularly pertinent when applied to the hierarchical relations between Prime Minister and King. riting to the Prince of Wales on July 14, 1731, Lord Hervey would remark that Sir Robert Walpole’s Houghton Hall in Norfolk was a paradigm of W‘taste, expense, state and parade.’1 This comment in itself is perhaps unsurprising – country houses, after all, have always been about display, founded and embellished as part of a conscious mission to establish a dynastic ‘line’.2 However, what makes this comment so interesting in Walpole’s case is that as the first Prime Minister, Walpole was essentially a commoner who had risen to power.
    [Show full text]
  • 441044 Vol2.Pdf
    THE LITERARY REMAINS OF CHARLES HOWARD, THIRD EARL OF CARLISLE (1669 -1738) A CRITICAL EDITION WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES TWO VOLUMES with separate Appendix VOLUME 2 QUENTIN HARCOURT WILSON PHD JULY 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page VOLUME 2 CHAPTER 4 ELDER STATESMAN: i POLITICIAN i Some Observations upon a Paper 277 CHAPTER 5 INTERLUDE iA Riddle upon a Game called Quadrille 309 CHAPTER 6 EL. DER STA TESMAN: ii PHILOSOPHER 1 Introduction to this group of Manuscripts 324 11 Background, Structure and Content 331 111 An Essay upon God and His Prophets 353 1V An Essay on Man and Nature 376 V An Essay on God, Man and Reason 388 Vi Remaining Mss relating to the "Essays" 398 Vii Poem: Reason, a Goddess 430 CHAPTER 7 LAST THINGS i Introduction to these Manuscripts 443 ii Poem: Advice to his Son (1738 Tex t) 461 iii Poem: Advice to his Son (mid-C 19th) 472 CONCLUSION 481 SUPPLEMENT A Letter of Carlisle to Sunderland dated 28/9/1720 (CH/J8/1/696) 484 BIBLIOGRAPHY 488 276 CHAPTER 4 ELDER STATESMAN: POLITICIAN Some Observations upon a Paper intituled The List [1733] 277 277 INTRODUCTION Some Observations upon a Paper intituled The List is the only document included here not existing in manuscript form at Castle Howard. Although anonymous, its attribution to Carlisle is confidently made from archive evidence. It is included as a significant document in the political life of the period, demonstrating Carlisle's involvement with contemporary events. Amongst letters addressed to Carlisle are two from Horatio Walpole, Cofferer to the Royal Household, and younger brother of Sir Robert.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Encounters and the Archives Global Encounters a Nd the Archives
    1 Global Encounters and the Archives Global EncountErs a nd thE archivEs Britain’s Empire in the Age of Horace Walpole (1717–1797) An exhibition at the Lewis Walpole Library, Yale University October 20, 2017, through March 2, 2018 Curated by Justin Brooks and Heather V. Vermeulen, with Steve Pincus and Cynthia Roman Foreword On this occasion of the 300th anniversary of Horace In association with this exhibition the library Walpole’s birthday in 2017 and the 100th anniversary will sponsor a two-day conference in New Haven of W.S. Lewis’s Yale class of 2018, Global Encounters on February 9–10, 2018, that will present new and the Archives: Britain’s Empire in the Age of Horace archival-based research on Britain’s global empire Walpole embraces the Lewis Walpole Library’s central in the long eighteenth century and consider how mission to foster eighteenth-century studies through current multi-disciplinary methodologies invite research in archives and special collections. Lewis’s creative research in special collections. bequest to Yale was informed by his belief that “the cynthia roman most important thing about collections is that they Curator of Prints, Drawings and Paintings furnish the means for each generation to make its The Lewis Walpole Library own appraisals.”1 The rich resources, including manuscripts, rare printed texts, and graphic images, 1 W.S. Lewis, Collector’s Progress, 1st ed. (New York: indeed provide opportunity for scholars across Alfred A. Knopf, 1951), 231. academic disciplines to explore anew the complexities and wide-reaching impact of Britain’s global interests in the long eighteenth century Global Encounters and the Archives is the product of a lively collaboration between the library and Yale faculty and graduate students across academic disci- plines.
    [Show full text]
  • John Boydell's Shakespeare Gallery and the Promotion of a National Aesthetic
    JOHN BOYDELL'S SHAKESPEARE GALLERY AND THE PROMOTION OF A NATIONAL AESTHETIC ROSEMARIE DIAS TWO VOLUMES VOLUME I PHD THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART SEPTEMBER 2003 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Volume I Abstract 3 List of Illustrations 4 Introduction 11 I Creating a Space for English Art 30 II Reynolds, Boydell and Northcote: Negotiating the Ideology 85 of the English Aesthetic. III "The Shakespeare of the Canvas": Fuseli and the 154 Construction of English Artistic Genius IV "Another Hogarth is Known": Robert Smirke's Seven Ages 203 of Man and the Construction of the English School V Pall Mall and Beyond: The Reception and Consumption of 244 Boydell's Shakespeare after 1793 290 Conclusion Bibliography 293 Volume II Illustrations 3 ABSTRACT This thesis offers a new analysis of John Boydell's Shakespeare Gallery, an exhibition venture operating in London between 1789 and 1805. It explores a number of trajectories embarked upon by Boydell and his artists in their collective attempt to promote an English aesthetic. It broadly argues that the Shakespeare Gallery offered an antidote to a variety of perceived problems which had emerged at the Royal Academy over the previous twenty years, defining itself against Academic theory and practice. Identifying and examining the cluster of spatial, ideological and aesthetic concerns which characterised the Shakespeare Gallery, my research suggests that the Gallery promoted a vision for a national art form which corresponded to contemporary senses of English cultural and political identity, and takes issue with current art-historical perceptions about the 'failure' of Boydell's scheme. The introduction maps out some of the existing scholarship in this area and exposes the gaps which art historians have previously left in our understanding of the Shakespeare Gallery.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Literary Records
    Shakespearean Biografiction: How modern biographers rely on context, conjecture and inference to construct a life of the Bard A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Arts and Humanities Brunel University By Kevin Gilvary November 2014 ii Candidate Kevin Gilvary (1955- ) B.A. (Hons), Classics, Southampton, 1976 M.A., Classics, Southampton, 1978 M.A. (Ed), Language in Education, Southampton 1996 P.G.C.E., Institute of Education, London, 1980 Doctoral Study 2007-2014 (part-time), Brunel University Supervisor 1 Professor William Leahy, School of Arts, Brunel University Supervisor 2 Dr. Sean Gaston, School of Arts, Brunel University Examiner 1 Professor Tom Betteridge, School of Arts, Brunel University Examiner 2 Professor Tom Healey, University of Sussex iii Abstract Modern biographies of William Shakespeare abound: new studies appear almost every year, each claiming new research and new insights, while affirming that there are enough records for a documentary life. In this thesis, I argue that no biography of Shakespeare is possible due to insufficient material, that most of what is written about Shakespeare cannot be verified from primary sources, and that Shakespearean biography did not attain scholarly or academic respectability until Samuel Schoenbaum’s Documentary Life (1975). The thesis therefore is concerned with demythologising Shakespeare by exposing numerous “biogra-fictions.” I begin by reviewing the history and practice of biography as a narrative account of a person’s life based on primary sources. Next I assess the very limited biographical material for Shakespeare identifying the gaps, e.g. there is no record that he spent any of his childhood in Stratford or ever attended school.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Mueller Thesis Final.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE SCHOOL OF MUSIC PRETTY OPHELIA: THE DESTRUCTIVE NATURE OF OBJECTIFICATION THROUGH MUSIC AND PROSE LEAH W. MUELLER Spring 2012 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Music Education with honors in Music Reviewed and approved* by the following: Ted Christopher Assistant Professor of Music Thesis Supervisor Joanne Rutkowski Professor of Music Education Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College i ABSTRACT Shakespeare’s Ophelia has long fascinated composers, painters, poets, and scholars alike. She is at first beautiful and pure, but descends into utter madness filled with dark coded phrases that leave plenty of room for mystery and interpretation. In this thesis I investigated the lack of personal identity and tragic circumstances that lead to Ophelia’s demise. All who surround her, Hamlet, Polonius, Laertes, and even Shakespeare himself, constantly objectify her. The successive composers who have interpreted Ophelia diminish this objectification by giving her, her own voice. As part of this thesis project, a recital featuring the Brahms’ and Strauss Ophelia lieder as well as a performance of the original Shakespeare text was given on November 15th, 2011. The recital program, program notes, script, and video are included in this thesis. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT i TABLE OF CONTENTS ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii CHAPTER 1: OPHELIA IN PROSE Introduction 1 Ophelia and the Play 2 A Symbol of Purity 5 Ophelia Through the Feminist Gaze 8 CHAPTER 2: OPHELIA IN MUSIC Ophelia and the French 13 Ophelia and the Germans 16 CHAPTER 3: OPHELIA ONSTAGE Performance Planning 22 Rehearsing for the Performance 25 CHAPTER 4: SUMMARY, DISCUSSION, & CONCLUSION Summary 27 Discussion 28 Conclusion 29 BIBLIOGRAPHY 30 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Performance Script 32 APPENDIX B: Recital Program 40 APPENDIX C: Recital Program Notes 42 APPENDIX D: Video of Performance Project 45 Academic Vita iii ACKNOWLEGMENTS I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantis 31.2
    Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos Vol. 31, núm. 2 Diciembre 2009 31.2 (December 2009) 31.2 (Diciembre 2009) EDITORS Editores General Editor: Angela Downing Universidad Complutense de Madrid Assistant Editor: Ludmila Urbanová Managing Editor: Carmen Méndez University of Brno Universidad Complutense de Madrid Book Reviews Editor: Clara Calvo Editor’s Assistant: Juan Rafael Zamorano Universidad de Murcia Universidad Complutense de Madrid Universität Bremen Copy Editor: Jorge Arús Hita Universidad Complutense de Madrid EDITORIAL BOARD Consejo de Redacción BOARD OF ADVISORS Consejo Asesor Andrew Blake Heinz Ickstadt University of Winchester Freie Universität Berlin Martin Bygate J. Hillis Miller Lancaster University University of California at Irvine Teresa Fanego Susheila M. Nasta Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Open University Fernando Galván Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Universidad de Alcalá de Henares Universidad de La Rioja BOARD OF REFEREES Consejo Científico y Evaluador Joan C. Beal Rachel Bowlby Graham D. Caie University of Sheffield University College London University of Glasgow Jesús Benito Sánchez Kris Van den Branden Gordon Campbell Universidad de Valladolid Katholieke Universiteit Leuven University of Leicester Marcella Bertuccelli Papi Mario Brdar Isabel Carrera Università di Pisa Josip Juraj Strossmayer University Universidad de Oviedo Nilufer E. Bharucha Laurel J. Brinton Shirley Chew University of Mumbai University of British Columbia University of Leeds Clare Birchall Manuel Broncano Robert Clark Middlesex University Universidad de León University of East Anglia Anita Biressi Jorge Luis Bueno Alonso Thomas Claviez Roehampton University University of Vigo University of Bern Maggie Ann Bowers Christopher S. Butler Tom Cohen University of Portsmouth Swansea University University of Albany Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre David Johnson Victor J.
    [Show full text]
  • Horace Walpole's Letters
    The Letters of Horace Walpole, Volume 1 by Horace Walpole The Letters of Horace Walpole, Volume 1 by Horace Walpole editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the US unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we usually do not keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. The "legal small print" and other information about this book may now be found at the end of this file. Please read this important information, as it gives you specific rights and tells you about restrictions in how the file may be used. *** This etext was produced by Marjorie Fulton. For easier searching, letters have been numbered. Only the page numbers that appear in the table of contents have been retained in the text of letters. Footnotes have been regrouped as endnotes following the letter to which they relate. THE LETTERS of HORACE WALPOLE, EARL OF ORFORD: page 1 / 793 INCLUDING NUMEROUS LETTERS NOW FIRST PUBLISHED FROM THE ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS. IN FOUR VOLUMES VOL. 1. 1735-1748. CONTENTS OF VOL. 1. PREFACE--25 Advertisement--33 Second advertisement--40 Sir Charles Grey's Letter connecting Walpole with Junius--41 Sketch of the Life of Horace Walpole, Earl of Orford, by Lord Dover--47 REMINISCENCES OF THE COURTS OF GEORGE THE FIRST AND SECOND. CHAPTer 1.--67 page 2 / 793 Motives to the Undertaking-Precedents-George the First's Reign-a Proem to the History of the Reigning House of Brunswick-The Reminiscent introduced to that Monarch-His Person and Dress-The Duchess of Kendal-her Jealousy of Sir Robert Walpole's Credit with the King-the
    [Show full text]
  • Mythologies of Poetic Creation in Twentieth-Century Russian Verse
    MYTHOLOGIES OF POETIC CREATION IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY RUSSIAN VERSE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ona Renner-Fahey, M.A. * * * * The Ohio State University 2002 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Angela K. Brintlinger, Adviser ___________________________ Professor Irene Masing-Delic Adviser Department of Slavic and East Professor Richard Davis European Languages and Literatures ABSTRACT In my dissertation, I address how four twentieth-century Russian poets grapple(d) with the mysteries of poetic inspiration and I propose what I consider to be their personal mythologies of the creative process. As none of these poets offers a comprehensive description of his/her personal mythology of poetic creation, my task has been to sift through the poets= poems and prose in order to uncover pertinent textual references to themes of inspiration. The four poet-subjects are Osip Mandelstam, Anna Akhmatova, Joseph Brodsky, and Olga Sedakova. Together they represent many of the factors contributing to the remarkable genius of twentieth-century Russian poetry. By looking at these four particular mythologies of poetic creation, we are able to view notions developed by both genders, within two faiths, in both capitals, and throughout the entirety of the century. It is significant that each of these poets has turned to prose to work out his/her ideas concerning the creative process. In reconstructing these mythologies of poetic creation, I have looked to the poets= entire oeuvres and the Asingle semantic system@ working within each of them. My work aims to bring together poets= prose and poetry and to offer readings of texts that are guided by the poets own concerns and beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics in the Age of Revolution, 17151848 Part 1: the Papers of Edmund Burke, 17291797, from Sheffiel
    Politics in the Age of Revolution, 1715­1848 ­ Part 1: The Papers of Edmund Burke, 1729­1797, from Sheffield Archives No [Bk P] Date Correspondent Location 01­Jan 09­Jun­44 to Richard B 01­Feb 01­Nov­44 to Richard OF 1/3P 25 Jan 44/45 to Richard OF 1/4P 19 Mar 44/45 to Richard OF 1/5P 26 Apr (46) to Richard OF 1/6P 12­Jul­46 to Richard OF 1/7P (c.3 Feb 46/47) to Richard OF 01­Aug 21 Mar 46/47 to Richard OF 28­Sep 5 Jan (48/49) to Richard S 40/1 Nov­50 to William Burke S 40/7 Nov­50 fr William Burke S 1/9P 31­Aug­51 to Richard OF 1/10P 28­Sep­52 to Richard OF 40/19 Sep (52) to Dr Christopher S 40/9 Jun­53 WB to Dr S 01­Nov 10­Aug­57 to Richard OF 01­Dec 20 Nov (59) fr Charles O'Hara S Jan­13 10 Apr (60) fr Charles O'Hara S 1/14P 16­Jan­61 fr Mrs Kempe S 1/15P 25­Aug­61 to Richard OF 28­Aug ­61 to Wm Dennis S Jan­16 01­May­62 fr Joseph Wilcocks S Jan­17 24­Jun­62 Sir Richard Aston to S Jan­18 10­Aug­62 fr Charles O'Hara S 1/19P (Mar 63) to Wm Gerard S 1/20­1,2P (p19) Apr 63 to Richard OF 1/21P 20, 21 Apr 63 WB fr Frederick N Jan­22 23 Apr (63) to John Ridge S Jan­23 4 Jul (63) fr Charles O'Hara S Jan­24 26 Jul (63) fr Charles O'Hara S 1/25­1,2P 17­Jul­64 to Richard OF Jan­26 24 Jul (64) fr Charles O'Hara S 1/27­1,2P 16­Aug­64 fr Mrs E Bourke & N Jan­28 20 Sep(64) fr Charles O'Hara S Jan­29 27­Sep­64 fr Charles O’Hara S Jan­30 14­Oct­64 fr John Hely S Hutchinson Jan­31 20 Nov (64) fr Charles O'Hara S Jan­32 15­Dec­64 fr Dr John Curry S Jan­33 14 Jan (65) fr Charles O'Hara S 1/34­1,2P (a12 Feb 65)(Sun) fr Wm Gerard S Jan­35 (a12 Feb 65)(Mon)
    [Show full text]