An Evolutionarily Acquired Microrna Shapes Development of Mammalian Cortical Projections

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Evolutionarily Acquired Microrna Shapes Development of Mammalian Cortical Projections An evolutionarily acquired microRNA shapes development of mammalian cortical projections Jessica L. Diaza,1, Verl B. Siththanandana,1, Victoria Lua,1, Nicole Gonzalez-Navaa, Lincoln Pasquinab,c, Jessica L. MacDonaldb,c,2, Mollie B. Woodworthb,c,d, Abdulkadir Ozkanb,c, Ramesh Naire, Zihuai Hea, Vibhu Sahnib,c,3, Peter Sarnowf, Theo D. Palmera, Jeffrey D. Macklisb,c,4,5, and Suzanne Tharina,g,4,5 aDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; bDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; cCenter for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; dDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; eDepartment of Genetics, Stanford Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; fDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; and gDivision of Neurosurgery, Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304 Edited by Carla J. Shatz, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved September 29, 2020 (received for review April 8, 2020) The corticospinal tract is unique to mammals and the corpus layers (13). In the mouse, CSMN and a subset of CPN are gen- callosum is unique to placental mammals (eutherians). The emer- erated around embryonic day 13.5 (e13.5), and both reside in the gence of these structures is thought to underpin the evolutionary deep cortical layer V (Fig. 1A). A larger subset of CPN is gener- acquisition of complex motor and cognitive skills. Corticospinal ated around e15.5, and it populates the superficial cortical layer(s) motor neurons (CSMN) and callosal projection neurons (CPN) are II/III (Fig. 1A). A body of research from the last ∼15 y has un- the archetypal projection neurons of the corticospinal tract and covered a set of key molecules, largely transcriptional regulators, corpus callosum, respectively. Although a number of conserved that control cortical projection neuron development. These dis- transcriptional regulators of CSMN and CPN development have coveries have been central to defining the current paradigm of been identified in vertebrates, none are unique to mammals and combinatorial transcription factor controls (6–8). most are coexpressed across multiple projection neuron subtypes. A number of transcription factors required for cortical pro- Here, we discover 17 CSMN-enriched microRNAs (miRNAs), 15 of jection neuron development have been identified as differen- which map to a single genomic cluster that is exclusive to euthe- tially expressed by CSMN, CPN, and other cortical projection rians. One of these, miR-409-3p, promotes CSMN subtype identity neuron subtypes, and their roles delineated by functional anal- NEUROSCIENCE in part via repression of LMO4, a key transcriptional regulator of yses. For example, Fezf2 is a transcription factor required for CPN development. In vivo, miR-409-3p is sufficient to convert deep-layer CPN into CSMN. This is a demonstration of an evolu- tionarily acquired miRNA in eutherians that refines cortical projec- Significance tion neuron subtype development. Our findings implicate miRNAs in the eutherians’ increase in neuronal subtype and projection di- The mammalian central nervous system contains unique pro- versity, the anatomic underpinnings of their complex behavior. jections from the cerebral cortex thought to underpin complex motor and cognitive skills, including the corticospinal tract and cerebral cortex | cortical development | microRNA | motor neuron | corpus callosum. The neurons giving rise to these projections— projection neuron corticospinal and callosal projection neurons—develop from the same progenitors, but acquire strikingly different fates. The he size and complexity of the mammalian brain dramatically broad evolutionary conservation of known genes controlling Tincreased with the evolution of placental mammals (euthe- cortical projection neuron fates raises the question of how the rians). Eutherian evolutionary innovations included the consol- more narrowly conserved corticospinal and callosal projections idation of the motor cortex, the completion of the corticospinal evolved. We identify a microRNA cluster selectively expressed by tract, and the appearance of the corpus callosum (1–4). This corticospinal projection neurons and exclusive to placental mammals. One of these microRNAs promotes corticospinal fate evolution expanded both the overall number and the number of via regulation of the callosal gene LMO4, suggesting a mecha- distinct subtypes of cortical projection neurons—the large, ex- nism whereby microRNA regulation during development pro- citatory pyramidal neurons with axons that project long distances motes evolution of neuronal diversity. to deep, contralateral, or subcerebral structures. The archetypal cortical projection neurons of the eutherian Author contributions: J.L.D., V.B.S., V.L., P.S., T.D.P., J.D.M., and S.T. designed research; corticospinal tract and corpus callosum are, respectively, corti- J.L.D., V.B.S., V.L., N.G.-N., L.P., J.L.M., A.O., V.S., and S.T. performed research; R.N., Z.H., cospinal motor neurons (CSMN) and callosal projection neurons and S.T. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; J.L.D., V.B.S., N.G.-N., M.B.W., R.N., Z.H., (CPN). CSMN project from the motor cortex via the cortico- and S.T. analyzed data; and M.B.W., P.S., T.D.P., J.D.M., and S.T. wrote the paper. spinal tract to the spinal cord. They are centrally involved in the Competing interest statement: C.J.S. and authors J.L.D., V.B.S., V.L., N.G.-N., M.B.W., R.N., Z.H., P.S., T.D.P., and S.T. are affiliated with Stanford University. most skilled voluntary movement. By contrast, CPN project from the cerebral cortex via the corpus callosum to the contralateral This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. cortex. They are involved in associative and integrative function This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND). (5). Despite their dramatically different projections and func- 1J.L.D., V.B.S., and V.L. contributed equally to this work. tions, CSMN and CPN are closely related in their development; 2 CSMN and deep-layer CPN are born at the same time and share Present address: Department of Biology, Program in Neuroscience, Syracuse University, – Syracuse, NY 13244. common progenitors (5 8). 3Present address: Burke Neurological Institute, Weill-Cornell Medicine, White Plains, CSMN, CPN, and other cortical projection neurons develop NY 10605. through waves of neurogenesis, radial migration, and differen- 4J.D.M. and S.T. contributed equally to this work. tiation from radial glial progenitors of the ventricular zone and 5To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected] or intermediate progenitor cells of the subventricular zone (9–12). [email protected]. The six-layered mammalian neocortex is generated in an inside- This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/ out fashion, with the earliest-born neurons populating the deepest doi:10.1073/pnas.2006700117/-/DCSupplemental. layers, and the last-born neurons populating the most superficial www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2006700117 PNAS Latest Articles | 1of10 Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 Fig. 1. miRNAs are differentially expressed by CSMN vs. CPN during their development. (A) Schematic of CSMN (red) and CPN (blue) development in mice. IPC: Intermediate Progenitor Cell; RGC: Radial Glial Cell. (B) Volcano plot of differential miRNA expression by CSMN vs. CPN on P1, with fold change expressed as RQ plotted against statistical significance expressed as FDR-adjusted P value (q-value), reveals 19 miRNA candidates enriched at least 4-fold in CSMN relative to CPN with a q-value of less than 0.2 (colored dots). (C) Two confirmed miRNA clusters, comprising 17 differentially expressed candidate miRNAs, and representative results of independent validation via qPCR on P2. miR-409-3p from megacluster is 6-fold enriched (RQ = 6) in CSMN vs. CPN on P2; miR193b-3p is 5,630-fold enriched in CSMN vs. CPN on P2. Error bars represent SEM. specification of CSMN and other deep-layer subcerebral pro- Results jection neuron subtypes (14, 15). Fezf2 acts as a selector gene, miRNAs Are Differentially Expressed by CSMN and CPN during regulating the expression of neurotransmitter and axon guidance Development. Multiple genes critical to cortical projection neu- – receptor genes in CSMN (15 20). SATB2, on the other hand, is a ron development are differentially expressed by CSMN vs. CPN transcription factor required for CPN identity. SATB2 regulates across eutherians, extensively studied in mice (6, 15, 22, 30–35). – the expression of a distinct set of downstream genes (21 23). Our studies considered the possibility that this differential mRNA Curiously, SATB2 is also required for early CSMN development, expression is in part controlled by miRNAs, which are known to including extension of CSMN axons to the corticospinal tract (23). coordinately regulate gene expression (27, 36). In a first series of LIM domain Only 4 (LMO4) is a LIM-homeodomain transcrip- experiments to address this question, we investigated whether tion factor that is initially expressed by both CSMN and CPN, but miRNA expression is regulated in a neuron subtype-specific way in becomes progressively restricted to CPN by late development (24). mice. We began by examining miRNA expression by CSMN vs. CPN LMO4 is important for the establishment of CPN areal identity at a critical developmental time point: on postnatal day 1 (P1), when (25) and is also required for projection target diversity of CPN these neurons express multiple lineage-restricted genes, but when within motor cortex (26). LMO4, along with Fezf2, SATB2, and the majority of their axons have not yet reached their targets (37). other developmental transcription factors, is coexpressed across CSMN and CPN were retrogradely labeled via ultrasound- multiple projection neuron subtypes early in their development guided nanoinjection of fluorescent latex microspheres into and is broadly conserved across noneutherian vertebrates (6).
Recommended publications
  • Bioinformatic Analysis of Structure and Function of LIM Domains of Human Zyxin Family Proteins
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Bioinformatic Analysis of Structure and Function of LIM Domains of Human Zyxin Family Proteins M. Quadir Siddiqui 1,† , Maulik D. Badmalia 1,† and Trushar R. Patel 1,2,3,* 1 Alberta RNA Research and Training Institute, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada; [email protected] (M.Q.S.); [email protected] (M.D.B.) 2 Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Disease, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada 3 Li Ka Shing Institute of Virology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to the work. Abstract: Members of the human Zyxin family are LIM domain-containing proteins that perform critical cellular functions and are indispensable for cellular integrity. Despite their importance, not much is known about their structure, functions, interactions and dynamics. To provide insights into these, we used a set of in-silico tools and databases and analyzed their amino acid sequence, phylogeny, post-translational modifications, structure-dynamics, molecular interactions, and func- tions. Our analysis revealed that zyxin members are ohnologs. Presence of a conserved nuclear export signal composed of LxxLxL/LxxxLxL consensus sequence, as well as a possible nuclear localization signal, suggesting that Zyxin family members may have nuclear and cytoplasmic roles. The molecular modeling and structural analysis indicated that Zyxin family LIM domains share Citation: Siddiqui, M.Q.; Badmalia, similarities with transcriptional regulators and have positively charged electrostatic patches, which M.D.; Patel, T.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Signaling Pathway Activities Improve Prognosis for Breast Cancer Yunlong Jiao1,2,3,4, Marta R
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/132357; this version posted April 29, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Signaling Pathway Activities Improve Prognosis for Breast Cancer Yunlong Jiao1,2,3,4, Marta R. Hidalgo5, Cankut Çubuk6, Alicia Amadoz5, José Carbonell- Caballero5, Jean-Philippe Vert1,2,3,4, and Joaquín Dopazo6,7,8,* 1MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, Centre for Computational Biology, 77300 Fontainebleau, France; 2Institut Curie, 75248 Paris Cedex, Franc; 3INSERM, U900, 75248 Paris Cedex, France; 4Ecole Normale Supérieure, Department of Mathematics and their Applications, 75005 Paris, France; 5 Computational Genomics Department, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (CIPF), 46012 Valencia, Spain; 6Clinical Bioinformatics Research Area, Fundación Progreso y Salud (FPS), Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013, Sevilla, Spain; 7Functional Genomics Node (INB), FPS, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; 8 Bioinformatics in Rare Diseases (BiER), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), FPS, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013, Sevilla, Spain *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Abstract With the advent of high-throughput technologies for genome-wide expression profiling, a large number of methods have been proposed to discover gene-based signatures as biomarkers to guide cancer prognosis. However, it is often difficult to interpret the list of genes in a prognostic signature regarding the underlying biological processes responsible for disease progression or therapeutic response. A particularly interesting alternative to gene-based biomarkers is mechanistic biomarkers, derived from signaling pathway activities, which are known to play a key role in cancer progression and thus provide more informative insights into cellular functions involved in cancer mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Lipid Droplets Protect Human Β Cells from Lipotoxic-Induced Stress and Cell
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.19.449124; this version posted June 20, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Lipid droplets protect human β cells from lipotoxic-induced stress and cell identity changes Xin Tong1 and Roland Stein1,2 1Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 2Corresponding author: [email protected]; Tel: 615-322-7026 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.19.449124; this version posted June 20, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract (200 words) Free fatty acids (FFAs) are often stored in lipid droplet (LD) depots for eventual metabolic and/or synthetic use in many cell types, such a muscle, liver, and fat. In pancreatic islets, overt LD accumulation was detected in humans but not mice. LD buildup in islets was principally observed after roughly 11 years of age, increasing throughout adulthood under physiologic conditions, and also enriched in type 2 diabetes. To obtain insight into the role of LDs in human islet β cell function, the levels of a key LD structural protein, perilipin2 (PLIN2), were manipulated by lentiviral-mediated knock-down (KD) or over-expression (OE) in EndoCβH2-Cre cells, a human cell line with adult islet β-like properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Disparate Binding Kinetics by an Intrinsically Disordered Domain Enables Temporal Regulation of Transcriptional Complex Formation
    Disparate binding kinetics by an intrinsically disordered domain enables temporal regulation of transcriptional complex formation Neil O. Robertsona, Ngaio C. Smitha, Athina Manakasa, Mahiar Mahjouba, Gordon McDonaldb, Ann H. Kwana, and Jacqueline M. Matthewsa,1 aSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; and bCentre for Translational Data Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Edited by G. Marius Clore, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD, and approved March 26, 2018 (received for review August 18, 2017) Intrinsically disordered regions are highly represented among C-terminal domain (Fig. 1A). LIM domain binding protein 1 mammalian transcription factors, where they often contribute to (LDB1) interacts with all LIM-HD/LMO proteins through a the formation of multiprotein complexes that regulate gene expres- disordered LIM interaction domain (LID) (Fig. 1A), which folds sion. An example of this occurs with LIM-homeodomain (LIM-HD) on binding to LIM1+2 domains to form extended modular com- proteins in the developing spinal cord. The LIM-HD protein LHX3 and plexes (9–11). Competition for LDB1 by LIM-HD/LMO proteins the LIM-HD cofactor LDB1 form a binary complex that gives rise to contributes to a so-called transcriptional “LIM code” that helps interneurons, whereas in adjacent cell populations, LHX3 and LDB1 determine cell fate in the developing spinal cord (12). A binary form a rearranged ternary complex with the LIM-HD protein ISL1, complex comprising LDB1 bound to the LIM-HD protein resulting in motor neurons. The protein–protein interactions within LHX3 triggers differentiation of V2-interneurons (V2-INs) these complexes are mediated by ordered LIM domains in the LIM- (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • 81428 LMO4 (D6V4Z) Rabbit Mab
    Revision 1 C 0 2 - t LMO4 (D6V4Z) Rabbit mAb a e r o t S Orders: 877-616-CELL (2355) [email protected] 8 Support: 877-678-TECH (8324) 2 4 Web: [email protected] 1 www.cellsignal.com 8 # 3 Trask Lane Danvers Massachusetts 01923 USA For Research Use Only. Not For Use In Diagnostic Procedures. Applications: Reactivity: Sensitivity: MW (kDa): Source/Isotype: UniProt ID: Entrez-Gene Id: WB H M Endogenous 16 Rabbit IgG P61968 8543 Product Usage Information Application Dilution Western Blotting 1:1000 Storage Supplied in 10 mM sodium HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 100 µg/ml BSA, 50% glycerol and less than 0.02% sodium azide. Store at –20°C. Do not aliquot the antibody. Specificity / Sensitivity LMO4 (D6V4Z) Rabbit mAb recognizes endogenous levels of total LMO4 protein. Species Reactivity: Human, Mouse Species predicted to react based on 100% sequence homology: Rat Source / Purification Monoclonal antibody is produced by immunizing animals with a synthetic peptide corresponding to residues near the carboxy terminus of human LMO4 protein. Background LMO4 is a LIM zinc-binding domain-containing protein. LMO4 cDNA was first isolated from a breast tumor cDNA library (1). This transcriptional modulator is overexpressed in several epithelial cancers such as prostate, pancreas, and breast (2-4). LMO4 exhibits pro-oncogenic activities by inducing centrosome amplification and mitotic spindle abnormalities (5). LMO4 is also expressed in the brain, in regions involved in learning and the regulation of motivated behavior. In the basolateral amygdala, LMO4 functions to negatively regulate fear learning (6). Furthermore, in the nucleus accumbens, LMO4 was found to regulate the behavioral effects of cocaine (7).
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham Germline RBBP8 Variants Associated With
    University of Birmingham Germline RBBP8 variants associated with early- onset breast cancer compromise replication fork stability The COMPLEXO Network DOI: 10.1172/JCI127521 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): The COMPLEXO Network 2020, 'Germline RBBP8 variants associated with early-onset breast cancer compromise replication fork stability', Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 130, no. 8, pp. 4069-4080. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI127521 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI127521. Copyright © 2020, American Society for Clinical Investigation General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequencing of Five Left–Right Cerebral Asymmetry Genes in a Cohort Of
    Original article 75 Sequencing of five left–right cerebral asymmetry genes in a cohort of schizophrenia and schizotypal disorder patients from Russia Anastasia Levchenkoa, Stepan Davtianb, Natalia Petrovab and Yegor Malashicheva Objective Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder, Conclusion This is the first study in which multiple affecting B1% of the human population. The genetic candidate genes for cerebral LR asymmetry and contribution to schizophrenia is significant, but the schizophrenia have been analyzed by sequencing. genetics are complex and many aspects of brain The approach to study the genetics of schizophrenia from functioning, from neural development to synapse structure, the perspective of an LR cerebral asymmetry disturbance seem to be involved in the pathogenesis. A novel way to deserves more attention. Psychiatr Genet 24:75–80 c study the molecular causes of schizophrenia is to study the 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. genetics of left–right (LR) brain asymmetry, the disease Psychiatric Genetics 2014, 24:75–80 feature often observed in schizophrenic patients. Keywords: candidate gene, cerebral asymmetry, DNA mutational analysis, Methods In this study, we analyzed by sequencing five novel genetic variant, schizophrenia candidate LR cerebral asymmetry genes in a cohort of 95 aDepartment of Embryology, Faculty of Biology and bDepartment of Psychiatry schizophrenia and schizotypal disorder patients from Saint and Narcology, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Petersburg, Russia. The gene list included LMO4, LRRTM1, Saint Petersburg, Russia FOXP2, the PCDH11X/Y gene pair, and SRY. Correspondence to Yegor Malashichev, PhD, Department of Embryology, Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab. 7/9, Saint Results We found 17 previously unreported variants in the Petersburg 199034, Russia Tel: + 7 812 3289453; fax: + 7 812 3289569; 0 genes LRRTM1, FOXP2, LMO4, and PCDH11X in the 3 -UTR e-mails: [email protected], [email protected] and 50-UTR.
    [Show full text]
  • CREB-Dependent Transcription in Astrocytes: Signalling Pathways, Gene Profiles and Neuroprotective Role in Brain Injury
    CREB-dependent transcription in astrocytes: signalling pathways, gene profiles and neuroprotective role in brain injury. Tesis doctoral Luis Pardo Fernández Bellaterra, Septiembre 2015 Instituto de Neurociencias Departamento de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular Unidad de Bioquímica y Biologia Molecular Facultad de Medicina CREB-dependent transcription in astrocytes: signalling pathways, gene profiles and neuroprotective role in brain injury. Memoria del trabajo experimental para optar al grado de doctor, correspondiente al Programa de Doctorado en Neurociencias del Instituto de Neurociencias de la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, llevado a cabo por Luis Pardo Fernández bajo la dirección de la Dra. Elena Galea Rodríguez de Velasco y la Dra. Roser Masgrau Juanola, en el Instituto de Neurociencias de la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Doctorando Directoras de tesis Luis Pardo Fernández Dra. Elena Galea Dra. Roser Masgrau In memoriam María Dolores Álvarez Durán Abuela, eres la culpable de que haya decidido recorrer el camino de la ciencia. Que estas líneas ayuden a conservar tu recuerdo. A mis padres y hermanos, A Meri INDEX I Summary 1 II Introduction 3 1 Astrocytes: physiology and pathology 5 1.1 Anatomical organization 6 1.2 Origins and heterogeneity 6 1.3 Astrocyte functions 8 1.3.1 Developmental functions 8 1.3.2 Neurovascular functions 9 1.3.3 Metabolic support 11 1.3.4 Homeostatic functions 13 1.3.5 Antioxidant functions 15 1.3.6 Signalling functions 15 1.4 Astrocytes in brain pathology 20 1.5 Reactive astrogliosis 22 2 The transcription
    [Show full text]
  • Negative Regulation of Estrogen Receptor a Transactivation Functions by LIM Domain Only 4 Protein
    Research Article Negative Regulation of Estrogen Receptor A Transactivation Functions by LIM Domain Only 4 Protein Rajesh R. Singh,1 Christopher J. Barnes,1 Amjad H. Talukder,1 Suzanne A.W. Fuqua,2 and Rakesh Kumar1 1Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and 2Breast Center and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas Abstract expression has been implicated in oncogenesis. LMO1 and LMO2 genes were discovered as oncogenes and are deregulated in acute LIM domain only 4 (LMO4), a member of the LIM-only family T-cell lymphocytic leukemia (3–5). LMO2 is an obligate regulator of transcriptional coregulatory proteins, consists of two LIM of hematopoiesis and angiogenesis (6, 7) and blocks the terminal protein-protein interaction domains that enable it to function differentiation of hematopoetic cells when overexpressed (8). as a linker protein in multiprotein complexes. Here, we LMO3 was discovered on the basis of sequence homology and have identified estrogen receptor A (ERA) and its corepressor, nothing much was known regarding its biological and pathologic metastasis tumor antigen 1 (MTA1), as two novel binding significance. Recently, it was found that LMO3 interacts with neural partners of LMO4. Interestingly, LMO4 exhibited binding with transcription factor HEN2 and functions as an oncogene in both ERA and MTA1 and existed as a complex with ERA, nueroblastoma, where the expression level of both LMO3 and MTA1, and histone deacetylases (HDAC), implying that HEN2 genes was high and associated with poor prognosis (9). LMO4 was a component of the MTA1 corepressor complex.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grainyhead-Like 2/Ovo-Like 2 Pathway Regulates Renal Epithelial Barrier Function and Lumen Expansion
    BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org A Grainyhead-Like 2/Ovo-Like 2 Pathway Regulates Renal Epithelial Barrier Function and Lumen Expansion † ‡ | Annekatrin Aue,* Christian Hinze,* Katharina Walentin,* Janett Ruffert,* Yesim Yurtdas,*§ | Max Werth,* Wei Chen,* Anja Rabien,§ Ergin Kilic,¶ Jörg-Dieter Schulzke,** †‡ Michael Schumann,** and Kai M. Schmidt-Ott* *Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany; †Experimental and Clinical Research Center, and Departments of ‡Nephrology, §Urology, ¶Pathology, and **Gastroenterology, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany; and |Berlin Institute of Urologic Research, Berlin, Germany ABSTRACT Grainyhead transcription factors control epithelial barriers, tissue morphogenesis, and differentiation, but their role in the kidney is poorly understood. Here, we report that nephric duct, ureteric bud, and collecting duct epithelia express high levels of grainyhead-like homolog 2 (Grhl2) and that nephric duct lumen expansion is defective in Grhl2-deficient mice. In collecting duct epithelial cells, Grhl2 inactivation impaired epithelial barrier formation and inhibited lumen expansion. Molecular analyses showed that GRHL2 acts as a transcrip- tional activator and strongly associates with histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation. Integrating genome-wide GRHL2 binding as well as H3 lysine 4 trimethylation chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing and gene expression data allowed us to derive a high-confidence GRHL2 target set. GRHL2 transactivated a group of genes including Ovol2, encoding the ovo-like 2 zinc finger transcription factor, as well as E-cadherin, claudin 4 (Cldn4), and the small GTPase Rab25. Ovol2 induction alone was sufficient to bypass the requirement of Grhl2 for E-cadherin, Cldn4,andRab25 expression. Re-expression of either Ovol2 or a combination of Cldn4 and Rab25 was sufficient to rescue lumen expansion and barrier formation in Grhl2-deficient collecting duct cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Reciprocal Negative Regulation Between Lmx1a and Lmo4 Is Required for Inner Ear Formation
    The Journal of Neuroscience, June 6, 2018 • 38(23):5429–5440 • 5429 Development/Plasticity/Repair Reciprocal Negative Regulation Between Lmx1a and Lmo4 Is Required for Inner Ear Formation X Yanhan Huang,1 X Jennifer Hill,1 Andrew Yatteau,1 Loksum Wong,1 Tao Jiang,1 XJelena Petrovic,1 XLin Gan,3 X Lijin Dong,2 and XDoris K. Wu1 1National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, 2National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and 3Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642 LIM-domain containing transcription factors (LIM-TFs) are conserved factors important for embryogenesis. The specificity of these factors in transcriptional regulation is conferred by the complexes that they form with other proteins such as LIM-domain-binding (Ldb) proteins and LIM-domain only (LMO) proteins. Unlike LIM-TFs, these proteins do not bind DNA directly. LMO proteins are negative regulators of LIM-TFs and function by competing with LIM-TFs for binding to Ldb’s. Although the LIM-TF Lmx1a is expressed in the developing mouse hindbrain, which provides many of the extrinsic signals for inner ear formation, conditional knock-out embryos of both sexes show that the inner ear source of Lmx1a is the major contributor of ear patterning. In addition, we have found that the reciprocal interaction between Lmx1a and Lmo4 (a LMO protein within the inner ear) mediates the formation of both vestibular and auditory structures. Lmo4 negatively regulates Lmx1a to form the three sensory cristae, the anterior semicircular canal, and the shape of the utricle in the vestibule.
    [Show full text]
  • CHD8 Dosage Regulates Transcription in Pluripotency and Early Murine Neural Differentiation
    CHD8 dosage regulates transcription in pluripotency and early murine neural differentiation Sabina Sooda,b,1, Christopher M. Webera,b,1, H. Courtney Hodgesc,d, Andrey Krokhotine, Aryaman Shalizia,b, and Gerald R. Crabtreea,b,e,2 aDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; bDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; cDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030; dCenter for Precision Environmental Health, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030; and eHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815 Contributed by Gerald R. Crabtree, July 7, 2020 (sent for review December 16, 2019; reviewed by Bradley E. Bernstein and Gordon L. Hager) The chromatin remodeler CHD8 is among the most frequently mu- Here, we utilized mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and dif- tated genes in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). CHD8 has a dosage- ferentiation into neural progenitor cells (NPCs) as a model system sensitive role in ASD, but when and how it becomes critical to human to study the role of CHD8 in early embryonic gene regulation and social function is unclear. Here, we conducted genomic analyses of control of genome-wide accessibility. We created both homozygous heterozygous and homozygous Chd8 mouse embryonic stem cells and heterozygous Chd8 deletions, enabling us to characterize the and differentiated neural progenitors. We identify dosage-sensitive effect of gene dosage on these important processes. We demon- CHD8 transcriptional targets, sites of regulated accessibility, and an strate that CHD8 has a dosage-sensitive effect on transcriptional unexpected cooperation with SOX transcription factors.
    [Show full text]