Vyrovnání S Nacistickou Minulostí V Kontextu Řecko Německých Vztahů

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vyrovnání S Nacistickou Minulostí V Kontextu Řecko �Německých Vztahů UNIVERZITA KARLOVA V PRAZE FAKULTA SOCIÁLNÍCH VĚD Institut mezinárodních studií VYROVNÁNÍ S NACISTICKOU MINULOSTÍ V KONTEXTU ŘECKO -NĚMECKÝCH VZTAHŮ Kateřina Králová Disertační práce Praha 2009 Autor práce: PhDr. Kateřina Králová M.A. Vedoucí práce: Prof. PhDr. Jiří Pešek, CSc. Oponent práce: Oponent práce: Datum obhajoby: Hodnocení: BIBLIOGRAFICKÝ ZÁZNAM KRÁLOVÁ, Kateřina. Vyrovnání s nacistickou minulostí v kontextu řecko-německých vztahů. Praha: Institut mezinárodních studií FSV UK, 2009, 277 str. Vedoucí diserta ční práce prof. PhDr. Jiří Pešek, CSc. ANOTACE Předložená disertační práce je historickou studií, která obeznamuje čtenáře s dosud málo probádanou problematikou poválečných řecko-německých vztahů ve stínu nacistické minulosti. Soustřeďuje se především na to, jakým způsobem se řecká společnost po druhé světové válce vypořádávala s dědictvím nacistické okupace, zvláště pak s otázku potrestání nacistických zločinů a odškodnění obětí německé okupace. Jednotlivá témata jsou přitom zkoumána v politické, socio-kulturní, ekonomické a právní rovině v kontextu studené války a po znovusjednocení Německa. ANNOTATION The doctoral thesis Reconciling with Nazi Past and the Greek-German Relations is a historical study of the Greek-German relations in the Cold War era and after the re- unification of Germany. Its main objective is to bring new insights into the topic of the legacy of Nazi occupation in Greece, with a particular focus on the prosecution of Nazi perpetrators and the related crime compensation for civilian victims. These problems are examined from a political, socio-cultural, economic as well as legal perspective. KLÍČOVÁ SLOVA Řecko, Německo, nacistická okupace, holocaust, řecká občanská válka, válečné zločiny, reparace, odškodnění KEY WORDS Greece, Germany, Nazi occupation, Holocaust, Greek civil war, war crimes, reparations, compensations of war ČESTNÉ PROHLÁŠENÍ Tímto prohlašuji, že jsem predkládanou práci vypracovala samostatně a použila pouze uvedené prameny a literaturu. Současně dávám svolení k tomu, aby byla práce v souladu s autorským právem zpřístupněna v příslušné knihovně a prostřednictvím elektronické databáze vysokoškolských kvalifikacních prací v repozitáři Univerzity Karlovy pro používání ke studijním účelům. V Praze, dne .......................... Kateřina Králová Obsah ÚVOD.......................................................................................................................................... 7 ŘECKO A TŘETÍ ŘÍŠE .......................................................................................................... 28 Řecko-německé vztahy v předvečer druhé světové války............................................... 28 Německá agrese....................................................................................................................... 32 Řecké loutkové vlády a kolaborace ..................................................................................... 36 Zima 1941 až 1942................................................................................................................ 37 Od pádu Tsolakogla po vládu Rallise............................................................................... 40 Kolaborace a bezpečnostní oddíly..................................................................................... 42 Hospodářská exploatace ........................................................................................................ 46 Nuceně nasazení .................................................................................................................. 51 Politika teroru.......................................................................................................................... 53 Kommeno.............................................................................................................................. 56 Kalavryta............................................................................................................................... 58 Distomo ................................................................................................................................. 60 Osud řeckých židů .................................................................................................................. 62 Německá zóna a soluňští židé............................................................................................ 66 „Konečné řešení“ ................................................................................................................. 70 Holocaust po kapitulaci Itálie ............................................................................................ 75 Válečné škody.......................................................................................................................... 78 POVÁLEČNÁ OBNOVA ŘECKA ....................................................................................... 81 Od okupace k občanské válce............................................................................................... 81 Právní rámec poválečného uspořádání ............................................................................... 86 Stíhání řeckých kolaborantů............................................................................................... 88 Právní úprava potrestání válečných zločinců.................................................................. 93 Humanitární pomoc a poválečná rekonstrukce ................................................................ 97 Červený kříž a UNRRA ...................................................................................................... 99 5 Mezinárodní organizace a obnova řecké židovské komunity..................................... 105 Opětovné navázání vztahů s Německem.......................................................................... 113 OTÁZKA POTRESTÁNÍ NACISTICKÝCH ZLOČINCŮ ............................................ 119 Mezinárodní angažmá.......................................................................................................... 119 Stíhání válečných zločinců v Řecku .................................................................................. 127 První fáze: potrestání......................................................................................................... 129 Druhá fáze: omilostnění.................................................................................................... 133 Třetí fáze: předání spisů.................................................................................................... 140 Případ Merten........................................................................................................................ 146 Merten ve vazbě................................................................................................................. 148 Od procesu k propuštění .................................................................................................. 155 Mertenova odplata............................................................................................................. 161 Trestní řízení po předání spisů .......................................................................................... 169 OTÁZKA POVÁLEČNÉHO ODŠKODNĚNÍ ................................................................. 179 Mezinárodní ujednání ......................................................................................................... 179 Pařížská reparační dohoda............................................................................................... 181 Londýnská dohoda o německých zahraničních dluzích.............................................. 186 Počáteční aktivity ve věci odškodnění na nevládní úrovní .......................................... 190 Odškodnění obětí holocaustu .......................................................................................... 192 Soukromé iniciativy ve prospěch obětí nacismu........................................................... 198 Globální dohoda o odškodnění.......................................................................................... 205 Bonnská dohoda................................................................................................................. 209 Rozdělovací zákon............................................................................................................. 214 PERSPEKTIVY ŘECKO-NĚMECKÉHO VYROVNÁNÍ PO ZNOVUSJEDNOCENÍ NĚMECKA ........................................................................... 219 Diskuse na politické úrovni.............................................................................................. 224 Případ Distomo .................................................................................................................. 227 Právo, politika, morálka.................................................................................................... 234 ZÁVĚR .................................................................................................................................... 240 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 250 BIBLIOGRAFIE..................................................................................................................... 253 6 Úvod Na sklonku 20. století se sjednocené Německo společně s Řeckem a dalšími, dnes již 25 zeměmi ocitlo ve sjednocené Evropě. Oba státy používají stejnou měnu, sdílejí evropské instituce a spolupracují na
Recommended publications
  • KALAVRYTA: Occupation of 1941-1944 and the Holocaust of December 13, 1943 Memories from the Village of Aghios Nikolaos
    KALAVRYTA: Occupation of 1941-1944 and the Holocaust of December 13, 1943 Memories from the Village of Aghios Nikolaos The Grieving Mother of Kalavryta Peter N. Demopoulos LOS ANGELES, 2017 KALAVRYTA: Occupation of 1941-1944 and the Holocaust of December 13, 1943 Memories from the Village of Aghios Nikolaos Peter N. Demopoulos …and you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. (John 8.32) 2017 First published in 2013 by Peter N. Demopoulos and the Hellenic University Club of Southern California in Los Angeles, California, www.huc.org . © Copyright 2015, 2017, Peter N. Demopoulos and the Hellenic University Club of Southern California. All rights reserved. Work may not be reproduced without permission by Peter N. Demopoulos or the publisher. Quoting is permitted with a reference to the source and a notice to the publisher at [email protected]. Published by the Hellenic University Club of Southern California PO Box 45581 Los Angeles, CA 90045-0581 USA ISBN-13: 978-1-938385-00-1 949.507 DF849 Published in the United States of America Second Edition 2017 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Also, can be found Online in GREEK and ENGLISH at the Hellenic University Club website www.huc.org Click on “Publications” and wait a few seconds for it to download. Contact: Peter N. Demopoulos 7485 McConnell Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90045 Phone/FAX: 310.215.3130 m: 310.923.1519 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreword……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Acronyms…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Greeks Defend Themselves Against the Invaders, 1940-1941…………………….. 6 The Italian Occupation ……………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • M7t'j¡.T7tór.ITL-Taav, 01Tou -~Sptut -To L:Tpa't
    - 'O &p z La-rp«-n¡y r)~ ' A. ll amiyo~ d~ M7t'J¡.t7tÓ r.IT L-taav, 01tou -~ Sptu t -to l:Tpa't;"l)­ ye:¡ov rij~ '0¡;.6. o<; ¡;.tpapzLwv 1< . ~ 1-: ::: 1 \ :' Avno:tpo7tO pLxov 7tup o ~6 ).ov f. v Spáae: L. 4 'O :cfwOu ::- ou?yl~ 'A. J ( ,.p~?;~ 11ni -r,,ij 1<. l{!'lñ:li (lmoOt.v r.i ptanptX) Jl.a.! -rtoií ft: tt~pylou A. llM:ztoo (tia--<.rn(JÜt;, 3t~l&.). 5 l. Soldados griegos de permiso tras la for freedom. lnstitute 0( the Greek 3. El generalísimo Alex. Papagos en Papaconstantinou, The Battle of Greece campaña de Albania dan una cálida bien· Parliamen~Atenas , 2005. Bobostitsa, Cuartel General del grupo divi· 1940-1 94 1, Keramikos, Atenas, 1966. venida a los australianos en Atenas. 2. El Comandante General R. Scobi y el sional K. Th. Papaconstantinou, The Battle 5. El primer ministro A. Korizis con marzo 1941. Del libro 60 years alter the secretario general del EAM D. Partsalides of Greece 1940-1941 , Keramikos, K. Kotzias (detrás a la izquierda) y George end of World War 11: Greeks and (segundo por la izquierda). (Cortesía del Atenas, 1966. A. Vlahos (sin sombrero, derecha). Th. Australians in the common struggle IWM). 4. El rey jorge 11 desayunando sobre un Papaconstantinou, The Battle of Greece peñasco en Kleisoura, Th. 1940-1941 , Keramikos, Atenas, /966. POÚTICAS DE LA IMAGEN FOTOGRÁFICA ~ Fotografía y política: Grecia 1940-1944 Procopis Papastratis es catédrático de Historia de la Procopis Papastratis Panteion University de Atenas. Es autor de British policy towards Greece during the Second World War 1941-1944 (Cambridge University Press, /984; 2' edición, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece
    CLASSICAL PRESENCES General Editors Lorna Hardwick James I. Porter CLASSICAL PRESENCES The texts, ideas, images, and material culture of ancient Greece and Rome have always been crucial to attempts to appropriate the past in order to authenticate the present. They underlie the mapping of change and the assertion and challenging of values and identities, old and new. Classical Presences brings the latest scholarship to bear on the contexts, theory, and practice of such use, and abuse, of the classical past. The Nation and its Ruins: Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece YANNIS HAMILAKIS 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York ß Yannis Hamilakis 2007 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany, International Justice and the 20Th Century
    Paul Betts Dept .of History University of Sussex NOT TO BE QUOTED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE AUTHOR: DRAFT VERSION: THE FINAL DRAFT OF THIS ESSAY WILL APPEAR IN A SPECIAL ISSUE OF HISTORY AND MEMORY IN APRIL, 2005, ED. ALON CONFINO Germany, International Justice and the 20th Century The turning of the millennium has predictably spurred fresh interest in reinterpreting the 20th century as a whole. Recent years have witnessed a bountiful crop of academic surveys, mass market picture books and television programs devoted to recalling the deeds and misdeeds of the last one hundred years. It then comes as no surprise that Germany often figures prominently in these new accounts. If nothing else, its responsibility for World War I, World War II and the Holocaust assures its villainous presence in most every retrospective on offer. That Germany alone experienced all of the modern forms of government in one compressed century – from constitutional monarchy, democratic socialism, fascism, Western liberalism to Soviet-style communism -- has also made it a favorite object lesson about the so-called Age of Extremes. Moreover, the enduring international influence of Weimar culture, feminism and the women’s movement, social democracy, post-1945 economic recovery, West German liberalism, environmental politics and most recently pacifism have also occasioned serious reconsideration of the contemporary relevance of the 20th century German past. Little wonder that several commentators have gone so far as to christen the “short twentieth century” between 1914 and 1989 as really the “German century,” to the extent that German history is commonly held as emblematic of Europe’s 20th century more generally.1 Acknowledging Germany’s central role in 20th century life has hardly made things easy for historians, however.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilakis Nation and Its Ruins.Pdf
    CLASSICAL PRESENCES General Editors Lorna Hardwick James I. Porter CLASSICAL PRESENCES The texts, ideas, images, and material culture of ancient Greece and Rome have always been crucial to attempts to appropriate the past in order to authenticate the present. They underlie the mapping of change and the assertion and challenging of values and identities, old and new. Classical Presences brings the latest scholarship to bear on the contexts, theory, and practice of such use, and abuse, of the classical past. The Nation and its Ruins: Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece YANNIS HAMILAKIS 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York ß Yannis Hamilakis 2007 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Partition of Korea After World War II This Page Intentionally Left Blank the PARTITION of KOREA AFTER WORLD WAR II
    The Partition of Korea after World War II This page intentionally left blank THE PARTITION OF KOREA AFTER WORLD WAR II A GLOBAL HISTORY Jongsoo Lee THE PARTITION OFKOREA AFTER WORLD WAR II © Jongsoo Lee, 2006. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2006 978-1-4039-6982-8 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. First published in 2006 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN™ 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 and Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England RG21 6XS Companies and representatives throughout the world. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin’s Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries. ISBN 978-1-349-53150-9 ISBN 978-1-4039-8301-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9781403983015 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lee, Jongsoo. The partition of Korea after world war II : a global history / Jongsoo Lee. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Korea—History—Partition, 1945– 2. World War, 1939–1945— Diplomatic history—Soviet Union. 3. World War, 1939–1945— Diplomatic history—United States. 4. Korea—History—Allied occupation, 1945–1948. I. Title. DS917.43.L44 2006 951.904Ј1—dc22 2005054895 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Design by Newgen Imaging Systems (P) Ltd., Chennai, India.
    [Show full text]
  • General Papagos and the Anglo-Greek Talks of February 1941 by JOHN S
    General Papagos and the Anglo-Greek Talks of February 1941 by JOHN S. KOLIOPOULOS The Anglo-Greek talks of February 1941 are one of the most con- troversial issues in the historiography of World War II. The talks were held in Athens to discuss Britain's decision earlier in that month to help Greece against a possible German attack, and to agree on a line of defense which could be reasonably expected to check the enemy ad- vance. In addition to the strength of the forces required to hold the enemy and the allocation of these forces, the representatives of the two 'countries were obliged to take into account two important factors: (a) the attitude of Yugoslavia; and (b) the time factor. In accordance with the agreement reached late on February 22, the British would send to Greece, in addition to their air force units already operating in the country, five squadrons of aircraft and land forces equal to four divisions. The British troops would arrive in three installments, and would be deployed on a line to the west of Salonika, running from northwest to southeast along Mt. Vermion and Mt. Olympus, the "Aliakmon line," as it was called. The Greeks, on the other hand, would provide four additional divisions (thirty-five battalions) from Thrace and eastern Macedonia for the defense of the Aliakmon line, and one division in reserve at Larissa. By the same agreement, Anthony Eden, the British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, undertook to approach Yugoslavia in order to enlist its military cooperation with Britain and Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Remembrance and Private Choice: German-Greek Conflict and Consumer Behavior in Times of Crisis*
    Collective Remembrance and Private Choice: German-Greek Conflict and Consumer Behavior in Times of Crisis* Vasiliki Fouka† Hans-Joachim Voth‡ January 2021 Abstract How is collective memory formed, and when does it impact behavior? We high- light two conditions under which the memory of past events comes to matter for the present: the associative nature of memory, and institutionalized acts of com- memoration by the state. During World War II, German troops occupying Greece perpetrated numerous massacres. Memories of those events resurfaced during the 2009 Greek debt crisis, leading to a drop in German car sales in Greece, especially in areas affected by German reprisals. Differential economic performance did not drive this divergence. Multiple pieces of evidence suggest that current events reac- tivated past memories, creating a backlash against Germany. Using quasi-random variation in public recognition of victim status, we show that institutionalized col- lective memory amplifies the effects of political conflict on consumer behavior. *For helpful suggestions we thank Alexander Apostolides, Leo Bursztyn, Bruno Caprettini, Luke Condra, Elias Dinas, Ray Fisman, Nicola Gennaioli, Luigi Guiso, Yannis Ioannides, Emir Kamenica, Tim Leunig, Sara Lowes, John Marshall, Guy Michaels, Stelios Michalopoulos, Nathan Nunn, Sonal Pandya, Elias Papaioannou, Luigi Pascali, Giacomo Ponzetto, Dominic Rohner, Alain Schlapfer,¨ Guido Tabellini, and Nico Voigtlander.¨ Seminar participants at Bocconi, CREI, Ente Einaudi, Har- vard, UPF, Columbia, LSE, the Workshop on Political Conflict in Washington University in St. Louis, the 2017 Zurich Conference on Origins and Consequences of Group Identities, the EREH-London conference, and the 12th Conference on Research on Economic Theory and Econometrics in Naxos provided useful advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Negyedéves, Internetes Folyóirat a KÖZELÍTÉSEK a Milton Friedman Egyetem Online Multidiszciplináris Folyóirata
    2018. 3-4. szám KÖZELÍTÉSEK negyedéves, internetes folyóirat A KÖZELÍTÉSEK a Milton Friedman Egyetem online multidiszciplináris folyóirata. Lektorált folyóirat. Minden publikálásra beküldött kéziratot két felkért opponens lektorál. FŐSZERKESZTŐK Laki Ildikó – A. Gergely András FELELŐS SZERKESZTŐ Szűts Zoltán SZERKESZTŐBIZOTTSÁG Grajczjár István – Milton Friedman Egyetem Hárskuti János – Milton Friedman Egyetem Szatmári Péter – Milton Friedman Egyetem Szegediné Lengyel Piroska – Milton Friedman Egyetem Schottner Krisztina – Milton Friedman Egyetem OLVASÓSZERKESZTŐ Szűcs Katalin Ágnes FELELŐS KIADÓ: Milton Friedman Egyetem – Szatmári Péter – megbízott rektor ELSŐ KIADÁS: 2011 ÚJ FOLYAM: 2014 ISSN 2498-7816 WEBCÍM: www.uni-milton.hu/letoltheto-kiadvanyok/, http://kozelitesek.webnode.hu DESIGN: Szitás István - Gerilla Design Bt. TARTALOM Surányi Ráchel BOURDIEU ÉS AZ IZRAELBEN ÉLő MAGYAROK IDENTITÁS- ÉS INTEGRÁCIÓ-STRATÉGIÁJA .................4 DOI: 10.25116/KOZELITESEK 2018.3-4.1 Buk Krisztina GYERMEKNEVELÉS ÉS TRANSZNACIONALIZMUS .............................................................................. 15 DOI: 10.25116/KOZELITESEK 2018.3-4.2 Rajkó Andrea – A. Gergely András EGY TÉMA TOVÁBBGONDOLÁSA ........................................................................................................32 DOI: 10.25116/KOZELITESEK 2018.3-4.3 Kata Zsófia Vincze “US” AND “THEM” JEWS AS THE OTHERS ..................................................................................... 62 DOI: 10.25116/KOZELITESEK 2018.3-4.4 Tóth Katalin EGY
    [Show full text]
  • Roth, Karl Heinz: Wohin Der Zeitgeist Weht
    Der folgende Text wird über DuEPublico, den Dokumenten- und Publikationsserver der Universität Duisburg-Essen, zur Verfügung gestellt. Diese auf DuEPublico veröffentlichte Version der E-Publikation kann von einer eventuell ebenfalls veröffentlichten Verlagsversion abweichen. Roth, Karl Heinz: Wohin der Zeitgeist weht. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Griechenlandhistoriker Heinz A. Richter. Erster Teil In: Sozial.Geschichte Online / Heft 21 / 2017 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/44672 URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:464-20171017-150332-1 Link: http://duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=44672 Rechtliche Vermerke: lizenziert nach [Creative Commons – CC BY-NC-ND 3.0] Karl Heinz Roth Wohin der Zeitgeist weht. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Griechenland- historiker Heinz A. Richter. Erster Teil* Einleitung Seit einigen Jahren sorgt der Griechenlandhistoriker Heinz A. Rich- ter mit seinen Veröffentlichungen und Vorträgen immer wieder für Aufregung. 2015 handelte er sich auf Kreta eine Anklage ein, wobei ihm vorgeworfen wurde, den Volksaufstand gegen die deutsche In- vasion verunglimpft zu haben.1 Im Frühjahr 2016 „entdeckten“ ihn die deutschen Leitmedien, nachdem er einige Monate zuvor als Re- ferent einer internen Tagung des Bundesfinanzministeriums eine spektakuläre Gegenrechnung gegen die griechischen Reparations- forderungen aufgemacht hatte.2 Das provozierte entschiedenen Wi- * Ich danke Hagen Fleischer, Eberhard Rondholz, Hartmut Rübner und Martin Seckendorf für Beratung, Kritik und Unterstützung bei der Beschaffung der teilwei- se nur schwer zugänglichen Literatur. Ohne ihre Unterstützung wäre diese Streit- schrift, für die ich selbstverständlich allein die Verantwortung trage, nur schwer rea- lisierbar gewesen. 1 Klaus Hildebrand, Prozess auf Kreta: Wie ein Historiker zum Nazi wird, taz.de, 28.06.2015, siehe [http://www.taz.de/!5205659/].
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet-American Relations and the Origins of Containment 1941-1946: the Force of Tradition
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1988 Soviet-American relations and the origins of containment 1941-1946: The force of tradition Anita Louise Coryell The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Coryell, Anita Louise, "Soviet-American relations and the origins of containment 1941-1946: The force of tradition" (1988). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5179. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5179 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th i s is an unpublished m a n u s c r ip t in w h ic h c o p y r ig h t s u b s i s t s . Any f u r t h e r r e p r in t in g of i t s c o n t e n t s m u st be APPROVED BY THE AUTHOR. Ma n s f i e l d L ib r a r y U n i v e r s i t y of Mo n ta n a Da t e : , 1 , SOVIET-AMERICAN RELATIONS AND THE ORIGINS OF CONTAINMENT, 1941-1946: THE FORCE OF TRADITION By Anita Louise Coryell B.A., Rutgers, The State University, 1974 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1988 Approved by: Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School lusrt/J Date UMI Number: EP40643 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Kriegsverbrechen Der Nazis
    Kriegsverbrechen der Nazis Verbrechen der Wehrmacht (aus Wikipedia) Als Verbrechen der Wehrmacht werden Verbrechen bezeichnet, die Angehörige der Wehrmacht im Zweiten Weltkrieg begangen haben. Zu ihnen gehören Planung und Durchführung von Angriffs- und Vernichtungskrieg, Massenmorde an Zivilisten und als Partisanen Verdächtigten, Misshandlung und Ermordung von Kriegsgefangenen, Besatzungsverbrechen sowie die direkte und indirekte Teilnahme an Völkermorden, darunter dem Holocaust und dem Porajmos. Die Wehrmachtführung erliess verbrecherische Befehle, die gegen Normen des Kriegsvölkerrechts (Genfer Konventionen, Haager Landkriegsordnung und Gepflogenheiten des Krieges) verstiessen. Die juristische und politische Aufarbeitung dieser Verbrechen ist bis heute nicht abgeschlossen. In NS-Prozessen seit 1945 wurden nur wenige Verbrechen der Wehrmacht verhandelt. Sie wurden in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland lange öffentlich bestritten oder verharmlost, ihre Strafverfolgung verschleppt und behindert. Wie viele einfache Soldaten an ihnen beteiligt waren, die Opferzahlen und die Motive der Täter sind bis heute umstritten. Verbrechensbereiche Verbrechen der Wehrmacht verteilen sich auf die Vorbereitung eines Angriffskriegs, der auf Vernichtung zielte, und tödliche Begleiterscheinungen und Folgen der Kriegführung. Ersteres geschah vor allem in Bezug auf Osteuropa, Letzteres geschah in und nach allen Eroberungskriegen der Wehrmacht, zuletzt auch beim Rückzug deutscher Truppen im "Altreich". Die Verbrechen erfolgten hauptsächlich in folgenden Bereichen:
    [Show full text]