The Royal Parks and the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fountain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Royal Parks and the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fountain House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts The Royal Parks and the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fountain Thirty–third Report of Session 2005–06 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 27 February 2006 HC 644 Published on 21 March 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £10.00 The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Current membership Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Mr Alistair Carmichael MP (Liberal Democrat, Orkney and Shetland) Greg Clark MP (Conservative, Tunbridge Wells) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow South West) Helen Goodman MP (Labour, Bishop Auckland) Mr Sadiq Khan MP (Labour, Tooting) Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) Sarah McCarthy-Fry MP (Labour, Portsmouth North) Mr Austin Mitchell MP (Labour, Great Grimsby) Jon Trickett MP (Labour, Hemsworth) Kitty Ussher MP (Labour, Burnley) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) Stephen Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Bristol West) The following was also a Member of the committee during the period of the enquiry: Diana R Johnson MP (Labour, Hull North) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at http://www.parliament.uk/pac. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Session is at the back of this volume. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee is Nick Wright (Clerk), Christine Randall (Committee Assistant), Emma Sawyer (Committee Assistant), Ronnie Jefferson (Secretary), and Luke Robinson (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk, Committee of Public Accounts, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 5708; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 Conclusions and recommendations 5 1 Management of The Royal Parks 7 2 Achieving a wider range of uses and users 9 3 Management of the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fountain 11 Formal minutes 13 Witnesses 14 List of written evidence 14 List of Reports from the Committee of Public Accounts Session 2005–06 15 3 Summary The eight Royal Parks covered in this Report are major historical and cultural resources, which cover some 5,000 acres and attract millions of visitors each year. The Parks are: St James’s Park, The Green Park, Hyde Park, Kensington Gardens and The Regent’s Park (with Primrose Hill) in Central London; Greenwich Park to the East; and Richmond Park and Bushy Park to the West. Figure 1 shows the locations of the Parks. Figure 1: The location of The Royal Parks PRIMROSE HILL CAMDEN ST JOHNS WOOD REGENT’S PARK GREEN PARK KENSINGTON GARDENS ST JAMES’S PARK HYDE PARK GREEN PARK HYDE PARK CORNER ST JAMES’S PARK MAZE HILL BUSHY PARK RICHMOND TEDDINGTON GREENWICH PARK RICHMOND PARK Source: C&AG’s Report, The Royal Parks – An Executive Agency The Parks are managed by The Royal Parks, an executive agency of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (the Department).1 The Royal Parks (the Agency) is accountable to Parliament through the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport who sets the organisation’s policy and key performance targets and determines its level of resources each year. In 2004–05 the Agency’s grant from the Department was £26.7 million and its self-generated 1 The Agency is responsible for a number of other areas, including Brompton Cemetery (Grade II listed), Victoria Tower Gardens and Grosvenor Square Gardens, and maintaining the gardens of Numbers 10, 11 and 12 Downing Street, Canning Green, St Margaret’s Church Green, Poets’ Green and the Longford River (the part within Hampton Court Palace Home Park comes under the management of Historic Royal Palaces). 4 income amounted to £6.9 million, making total income that year of £33.6 million. The Agency employed 97 Parks staff and 63 officers and administrative staff of The Royal Parks Constabulary.2 Much of the Agency’s work, including grounds and work maintenance, is contracted out. On the basis of a Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General,3 a subsequent memorandum updating the report4 and a note on the progress of the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fountain,5 the Committee took evidence from the Department and the Agency on the management of The Royal Parks, on achieving a wider range of users, and on the management of the fountain project. Management of The Royal Parks The Agency is responsible for maintaining the buildings, statues, memorials and roads within the Parks. The Agency estimates that it has a £65 million backlog of maintenance work and to help address this is seeking to make efficiency savings and generate more income. The Agency is aiming to raise £7 million of income in 2005–06 but commercial events, a significant source of income, can lead to damage in the Parks and in the past the Agency has had difficulties recovering its costs and making a profit. Although the Parks are highly regarded, the Agency has been too inward-looking in assessing its performance and has recently begun to explore opportunities for comparisons with other parks. Achieving a wider range of uses and users One of the Agency’s main objectives is to encourage greater access to the Parks but the Agency has little knowledge of the number, or background, of its visitors. The Agency is now collecting more reliable data on those visiting the Parks and on non-users. The Agency has not always focussed on the needs of its users but there are recent examples of the Agency looking to engage local communities more in the work of the Parks. Management of the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fountain The Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fountain in Hyde Park was opened in July 2004. But the Agency has had to close the fountain and carry out further work, on more than one occasion, due to flooding and people slipping in and around the Memorial. Costs of the fountain have risen to £5.2 million, exceeding the original budget of £3 million. The Agency is responsible for the future maintenance of the fountain at an estimated cost of £250,000 a year, which will divert resources from its other work in The Royal Parks. 2 Memorandum updating C&AG’s Report, paras 2, 4 (Ev 11–12). During 2004–05, a total of 103 Royal Parks Constabulary officers and civilians transferred to the Metropolitan Police Service, which has been co-policing The Royal Parks since 1 April 2004. 3 C&AG’s Report, The Agency: An Executive Agency (HC 485, Session 2003–04) 4 Ev 11–13 5 Ev 13–16 5 Conclusions and recommendations The eight Royal Parks provide opportunities for enjoyment and respite to millions of Londoners and visitors to London, but there are ways in which the Agency could more effectively manage its assets. 1. The Agency has accumulated a £65 million backlog of maintenance work. Having now completed condition surveys of the buildings and other structures in the Parks, the Agency should keep its records up-to-date so it can target resources on the areas of greatest need. By mid-2006 the Agency should have a costed plan for tackling the backlog, with clear performance milestones and measures. 2. Although commercial events help to generate income, large numbers of visitors can result in damage to the Parks. The Agency should seek opportunities to capitalise on the Parks’ assets in less intrusive ways. 3. There is untapped potential for the Agency to generate income from its considerable assets. In seeking to increase its income the Agency should: x take forward plans to brand and merchandise its own products, join forces with retail partners to reach a larger market and develop e-commerce opportunities via its website; x see what lessons can be learned from others for example the National Museums and Galleries and other parks; x improve the information it holds about the cost and profitability of income generating activities, and manage them to make a profit; x coordinate its activities with those of The Royal Parks Foundation, which has proved a successful source of additional income, so that their respective roles and accountabilities are made clear. 4. The Agency is missing out on opportunities to learn from others. The Agency should be more outward looking in assessing its performance. The Agency should identify suitable comparators in other parks, nationally and internationally, and establish mechanisms for the sharing of information and best practice by the end of 2006. 5. Visitor centres are only open during office hours and are often in the wrong place. Advice about the Parks should be readily available to visitors. The Parks’ visitor centres should be situated where people can easily get to them and open when people want to use them. 6. The Agency lacks reliable information about the users of the Parks.
Recommended publications
  • 2005 No. 1522 OPEN SPACES, ENGLAND and WALES the Royal
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2005 No. 1522 OPEN SPACES, ENGLAND AND WALES The Royal Parks (Regulation of Specified Parks) Order 2005 Made - - - - 6th June 2005 Laid before Parliament 8th June 2005 Coming into force - - 1st July 2005 The Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred upon her by section 162(4) of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005(a), hereby makes the following Order: Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Royal Parks (Regulation of Specified Parks) Order 2005 and shall come into force on 1st July 2005. Specified parks 2. The following parks, gardens, recreation grounds, open spaces or other land in the metropolitan police district are hereby specified for the purposes of section 162 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (Regulation of specified parks): Abingdon Street Garden, being the garden constructed on the sites of properties formerly known as 17-28 (both inclusive) Abingdon Street, London, SW1, the garden surrounding the adjoining Jewel Tower, and the lawn surrounding the King George V Memorial; Brompton Cemetery; Bushy Park; The Longford River and those parts of its banks which are for the time being under the control or management of the Secretary of State; Those parts of Greenwich Park which are for the time being under the control or management of the Secretary of State; Grosvenor Square Garden; Hampton Court Gardens; Hampton Court Green; Hampton Court Park; The Barge Walk (Hampton Court), being the whole of the riverside land under the control or management of the Secretary of State between Kingston and Hampton Court Bridges between the River Thames and the outer walls, gates, railings or fences of Hampton Court Park and Hampton Court Gardens; (a) 2005 c.
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Tosses Annexation
    Project1:Layout 1 6/10/2014 1:13 PM Page 1 Tennis: Back at Wimbledon, Coco Gauff advances /B1 FRIDAY TOD AY C I T R U S C O U N T Y & nex t m orning HIGH 88 P a r t l y u n n y ; LOW n u m e r o u s s h o w e r s , t o r m s . 72 PAGE A4 w w w.chronicleonline.com JULY 2, 2021 Florida’s Best Community Newspaper Serving Florida’s Best Community $1 VOL. 126 ISSUE 268 NEWS BRIEFS Judge tosses annexation Citrus gov’t offices closed July 5 Lakeside property had been at the center of a dispute between city, county C t r u s C u n t y o v e r n - MIKE WRIGHT Circuit Judge Peter RV Resort is planned for mile east of the city limits Brigham said the Eden m e n t f f i c e s i l l e Staff writer Brigham said in his ruling the 234-acre property. on State Road 44. property is “geographi- c l o s e d o n d a y , u l y , n that the city violated state Brigham agreed with “Simply put, the city cally isolated” from the o b s e r v a n c e f I d e p e n - A judge has sided with law by allowing the the county’s argument and the NH parcel do not city that would create a d e n c e D y .
    [Show full text]
  • Diana, Princess of Wales
    Diana, Princess of Wales The Lady Diana Frances Spencer (Diana Frances Mountbatten- Windsor, née Spencer) (1 July 1961–31 August 1997) was the first wife of Charles, Prince of Wales. From her marriage in 1981 to her divorce in 1996 she was styled Her Royal Highness The Princess of Wales. After her divorce in 1996, Diana ceased to be a Royal Highness and The Princess of Wales and instead was styled Diana, Princess of Wales. She was often called Princess Diana by the media and the public, but this was incorrect both during and after her marriage, as she was only ever a Princess by marriage, not by birth.' An iconic presence on the world- stage, Diana, Princess of Wales was noted for her pioneering charity work. Yet her philanthropic endeavours were overshadowed by her scandal-plagued marriage to Prince Charles. Her bitter accusations via friends and biographers of adultery, mental cruelty and emotional distress visited upon her riveted the world for much of the 1990s, spawning books, magazine articles and television movies. From the time of her engagement to the Prince of Wales in 1981 until her death in a car accident in 1997, the Princess was arguably the most famous woman in the world, the pre-eminent female celebrity of her generation: a fashion icon, an image of feminine beauty, admired and emulated for her high-profile involvement in AIDS issues and the international campaign against landmines. During her lifetime, she was often referred to as the most photographed person in the world. To her admirers, The Princess of Wales was a role model — after her death, there were even calls for her to be nominated for sainthood — while her detractors saw her life as a cautionary tale of how an obsession with publicity can ultimately destroy an individual.
    [Show full text]
  • St 9617 2004 Dcl 1
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 30 November 2020 (OR. en) 9617/04 DCL 1 LIMITE SCH-EVAL 33 COMIX 344 DECLASSIFICATION of document: 9617/04 RESTREINT UE dated: 17 May 2004 new status: LIMITE Subject: Questionnaire – Questions to UK on data protection arrangements relating to the UK’s national implementation of the Schengen Information System. - Answers from the UK Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 9617/04 DCL 1 KAL SMART 2.C.S1 LIMITE EN RESTREINT UE COUNCIL OF Brussels, 17 May 2004 THE EUROPEAN UNION 9617/04 RESTREINT UE SCH-EVAL 33 COMIX 344 NOTE from : UK delegation to : Schengen Evaluation Working Party No. prev. doc. : 9227/04 SCH-EVAL 25 COMIX 308 + ADD 1 Subject : Questionnaire – Questions to UK on data protection arrangements relating to the UK’s national implementation of the Schengen Information System. - Answers from the UK The United Kingdom has asked the Schengen Evaluation Group to undertake an evaluation of the data protection arrangements which it has in place to support the introduction of the Schengen Information System to the UK. As the UK’s technical solution to the SIS has not yet been finalised, the questions relate only to data protection arrangements. Questions relating to the management and handling of the data will be answered in the context of the full SIS evaluation which will take place once the UK’s national solution has been fully implemented. 1. Provide the list of services with access to SIS data See Annex A and Annex B 9617/04 WvdR/kve 1 DG H RESTREINT UE EN RESTREINT UE 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Value of Mounted Police Units in the UK
    Making and Breaking Barriers Assessing the value of mounted police units in the UK Chris Giacomantonio, Ben Bradford, Matthew Davies and Richard Martin For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/rr830 While the use of mounted police (i.e. police horses and riders) can be traced back to before the advent of the modern police service in 1829, very little is known about the actual work of mounted police from either academic or practitioner standpoints. Police horses are thought to have unique operational and symbolic value, particularly in public order policing (making barriers) and community engagement (breaking barriers) Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK deployments. They may represent a calming presence or, and potentially at the same time, an imposing threat of force. Yet, the relationship between the use of police horses and broader notions of policing by consent in the UK is presently unknown, and all R® is a registered trademark. evidence for these claims is anecdotal at best. In recent years, mounted units have come under resource scrutiny in the UK due to austerity measures. Some forces have eliminated their mounted capacities altogether, while others have developed collaborative or mutual assistance arrangements with © Copyright 2015 RAND Corporation and University of Oxford neighbouring forces. The relative costs and benefits of the available options – maintaining units, merging and centralising mounted resources or eliminating them in whole or part – cannot at present be assessed confidently by individual forces or by national coordinating agencies such as the Home Office, the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) and the National Police Coordination Centre (NPoCC).
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Records
    NORTH CAROLINA CONFERENCE THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH Historical Records • MEMORIAL SERVICE BULLETIN • MEMOIRS • ROLL OF DECEASED • HISTORICAL STATEMENT 218 All Saints Celebration - Memorial Service North Carolina Conference – The United Methodist Church Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:45 A.M. Greenville, North Carolina Gathering Video Prelude *Processional Hymn ................................................................ Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty ........................................................... UMH #64 1) Holy, holy, holy! Lord God Almighty! Early in the morning, our song shall rise to Thee. Holy, holy, holy! Merciful and mighty, God in three persons - blessed Trinity! 2) Holy, holy, holy! All the saints adore Thee, Casting down their golden crowns around the glassy sea; Cherubim and seraphim falling down before Thee, Which wert, and art, and evermore shall be. 3) Holy, holy, holy! Though the darkness hide Thee, Though the eye of sinful man thy glory may not see, Only Thou art holy; there is none beside Thee, Perfect in power, in love, and purity. 4) Holy, holy, holy! Lord God Almighty! All Thy works shall praise Thy name, in earth and sky and sea. Holy, holy, holy! Merciful and mighty, God in three persons - blessed Trinity. *Greeting Leader: Today we live in the tension between the “already” and the “not yet.” All: We are surrounded by the past yet looking toward the future; Leader: A past that reminds us of the blessings and presence of God with us in joys as well as in sorrow, All: and a future filled with God’s promises. Leader: A future when death and mourning and crying and pain will be no more. All: And God proclaims, “See, I am making all things new.” Leader: Today we worship the One who was, is and is to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks in London Report Number: 7
    Subject: Parks in London Report Number: 7 Report to: Culture, Sport and Tourism Committee Date: 10 March 2004 Report of: Director of Secretariat 1. Recommendations 1.1 The Committee agrees the terms of reference for the parks in London scrutiny. 2. Background 2.1 At it’s meeting on 11 February 2004, the Culture Sport and Tourism Committee formally agreed to co-host a reception on 16 March 2004 with the Heritage Lottery Fund. The Committee also agreed to consider examining the management and funding of Royal Parks in London at its meeting on 21 April 2004. 2.2 Members requested more information and terms of reference for the scrutiny. 3. Issues for Consideration 3.1 The Royal Parks Agency (RPA) is an executive agency of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. It manages 8 parks in London – St James Park, Green Park, Hyde Park, Kensington Gardens, Richmond Park, Greenwich Park, Regent’s Park, Bushy Park. Royal Parks also manages Brompton Cemetery, Downing Street residences and Grosvenor Square Gardens. 3.2 The Department of Culture Media and Sport allocates approximately £24m per annum to the RPA.1 In its most recent annual report, RPA noted that ‘our grant from DCMS is declining in real terms, year on year.’2 RPA is required by Government to increase self-generated income by £1.1m to £7 million from all sources by 2005/6. 3.3 The 5,000 hectares of Royal Parks are used by millions of Londoners for informal recreation – horse riding, golf, football, fishing and running. They play host to many large cultural events in London – outdoor classical and rock concerts, art exhibitions, theatre - and are home to significant London landmarks (for example, the London Zoo, the National Maritime Museum, Serpentine Galley).
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpted from AFTER DIANA by Christopher Andersen
    Excerpted from AFTER DIANA by Christopher Andersen. Copyright 2007 Christopher Andersen. All rights reserved. Published by Hyperion. Available wherever books are sold. 1 Sunday, August 31, 1997 5:35 P.M. He took a few steps toward the body, gasped, then reeled back as if struck by an unseen hand. Beatrice Humbert, the diminutive head nurse at Paris’s Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, began to reach out to steady Prince Charles but stopped herself as he regained his composure. “He was absolutely white,” she recalled, “as if he could not believe what he was seeing.” Humbert understood too well. Ever since Princess Diana had been brought in from the operating room where surgeons had tried in vain to save her, nearly everyone who walked into the second-floor room with its bright, freshly painted robin’s egg blue walls struggled to keep from fainting. “It was just too much to take in,” Humbert said, “too much, too much. .” Charles was “crushed,” said another nurse on the scene, Jeanne Lecorcher. “I had always thought of him and all the royals as very cold and unfeeling, and like everyone else I knew that he really loved Camilla. So I was very impressed by how emotional the Prince became. Very impressed.” No one was more surprised by this reaction than Charles. He thought he had had ample time to rebound from the initial shock. After all, it had been thirteen hours since he was awakened at Balmoral Castle in Scotland with the shocking news that his ex-wife had been injured and her lover, Dodi Fayed, killed in a Paris car crash.
    [Show full text]
  • Masaryk University Brno Faculty of Education
    Masaryk university Brno Faculty of Education Department of English Language and Literature The death of Diana, Princess of Wales - an accident or a conspiracy? bachelor thesis Brno2006 Supervisor: Writtenby: Paul NicholasClifford,Dip.Ed.,A.C.P.LenkaKrejčiříková I herebydeclare that I workedonthis thesis bymyself andthat I usedonlythe sources listedinthe bibliography. I agree that the thesis be depositedwiththe Libraryof the Faculty of Education of the MasarykUniversityinBrnoandmadeaccessible forstudypurposes. Brno,7June2006 LenkaKrejčiříková 1 I wouldlike tothankMr Paul Nicholas Clifford,Dip.Ed.,A.C.P.for his kindness and valuableadvice. 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...………………………………………………..………….………4 1.EARLY LIFE….……………………………………………………….....……...…5 1.1.IntroductionofDianaFrances Spencer,herfamilybackground, childhoodandteenageyears 2.THEROYALMARRIAGE ANDTHEPRINCESSOF WALES´S NEW ROLES……….......……………....…9 2.1.TheexpectationsoftheBritishmonarchy 2.2.ThePrincessofWales´sexpectationsofthemarriage 2.3.ThePrincessofWales´snewroles 2.3.1.RoleofthespouseofthePrinceof Wales 2.3.2.Roleofthemotherofthecrownprinces 3.DIVORCE–THEENDOFAFAIRYTALE..........................................................13 3.1.Thecausesfordivorce 3.2.Theconsequences ofthedivorce 4.CHARITY WORK…………………………………………………….….…........17 4.1.ThePrincessofWales´ssupportofcharityprojects 4.1.1.AIDS 4.1.2.Landmines 5.THEDEATHOFDIANA,PRINCESSOF WALES ANDITSCONSEQUENCES..…..……………………………...………………...19 5.1.Thecircumstancesofthedeath 5.2.ThereactionoftheBritishRoyalFamilyandpublic tothedeath 5.3.ThefuneralofDiana,Princess
    [Show full text]
  • The Wedding of His Royal Highness Prince William Of
    THE WEDDING OF HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCE WILLIAM OF WALES, K.G. WITH MISS CATHERINE MIDDLETON 29th APRIL 2011 A SUMMARY OF INFORMATION AS OF 28th APRIL 2011 1 Contents as of 28/04/11 Page ​ ● The Service 3 ● Costs 3 ● Timings 4 ● Members of the Wedding Party 6 ● Invitations 7 ● Selected Guest List for the Wedding Service at Westminster Abbey 8 ● Westminster Abbey Seating Plan 16 ● The Route 19 ● Cars and Carriages 19 ● Music for the Wedding Service 22 ● Wedding Musicians 24 ● Floral Displays 26 ● Wedding Ring 28 ● Receptions 29 ● Wedding Cake 30 ● Official Photographer 31 ● Westminster Abbey 32 ● Ceremonial Bodies 39 ● Official Souvenir Wedding Programme 41 ● New Coat of Arms for Miss Catherine Middleton and her Family 43 ● Instrument of Consent 45 ● Gifts 46 ● Wedding Website 54 ● The Royal Wedding Online – On the day 55 ● Visitors to London 57 ● Ministry of Defence Royal Wedding Commentary 58 ● The Royal Wedding Policing Operation 88 ● Media logistics 91 ● Biographies o Prince William 92 o Catherine Middleton 95 o The Prince of Wales 96 o The Duchess of Cornwall 99 o Prince Harry 100 o Clergy 102 o Organist and Master of the Choristers, Westminster Abbey 105 ● The British Monarchy 106 o The Queen 106 o The Prince of Wales 107 o The Royal Family 108 2 The Service The marriage of Prince William and Miss Catherine Middleton will take place at Westminster Abbey on Friday 29th April 2011. The Dean of Westminster will conduct the service, the Archbishop of Canterbury will marry Prince William and Miss Middleton, and the Bishop of London will give the address.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phoenix Park, Dublin & the Royal Parks, London
    The Phoenix Park, Dublin & The Royal Parks, London An Irish Guard and a British woman exchange glances, 1948 John Maurer (act.1720-1742) (engraved by Laurie and Whittle), St James’s Park, taken near the stable yard, 1794 The Phoenix Park, Dublin & The Royal Parks, London Published in 2017 by the Government Project Co-ordinator Text © 2017 Publications Office Margaret Gormley Rheme Fordham, Daniel Hearsum, The Office of Public Works Dr John A McCullen and the Office of Jonathan Swift Street Exhibition Curators Public Works Trim Dr John A McCullen County Meath Rheme Fordham All rights reserved. No part of this Ireland publication may be reproduced, stored Exhibition Designers in a system or transmitted, in any form, to coincide with the exhibition Steven McNamara or by any means, electronic, mechanical, Jurga Rakauskaite photocopying, recording or otherwise, Parks: Our Shared Heritage. without the necessary prior permission The Phoenix Park, Dublin and Catalogue Project Team of the publisher. The Royal Parks, London Margaret Gormley Bridgeen Kelly While every effort has been made to 7 April 2017 – 28 May 2017 Raychel Coyle contact and obtain permission from in Farmleigh, Dublin, and Niamh Guihen holders of copyright, if any involuntary Pat Blair infringement of copyright has occurred, 27 July 2017 – 15 August 2017 Dr John A McCullen sincere apologies are offered and the in The Mall Galleries, London Rheme Fordham owner of the copyright is requested to Daniel Hearsum contact the Office of Public Works. Catalogue Co-ordinators ISBN: XXXXXXXXXXXXX ISBN etc Margaret Gormley as of 26/1/17 Marie Harpur Catalogue Text Editor Elizabeth Mayes Catalogue Designer Paul Martin Printed and bound in Ireland ? by: XXXXXXXXX EXHIBITION VENUES Parks: Our Shared Heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • The BG News September 25, 1997
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU BG News (Student Newspaper) University Publications 9-25-1997 The BG News September 25, 1997 Bowling Green State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news Recommended Citation Bowling Green State University, "The BG News September 25, 1997" (1997). BG News (Student Newspaper). 6212. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news/6212 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in BG News (Student Newspaper) by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. Directory SPORTS OPINION 2 TODAY Jennifer Spahn says women Switchboard 372-2601 Men's Soccer Classified Ads 372-6977 Golf Display Ads 372-2605 are still seen as objects Editorial 372-6966 at Detroit-Mercy Men's and women's Sports 372-2602 5 p.m. golf notebook Entertainment 372-2603 LOCAL 4 Falcons hope to stifle the revenge Heading into this weekend's compe- sunny Slory idea? Give us a call factor as the Titans seek payback tition, BG's aim is improvement after Darla Warnock and Sarah Bednarski weekdays from I pm. to 5 pm., or for last year's NCAA Tournament last weekend's tournaments e-mail: "[email protected]" relive their train-riding experience High: 72 Low: 42 THURSDAY September 25,1997 Volume 84, Issue 21 The BG News Bowling Green, Ohio "Serving the Bowling Green community for over 75 years # Concerns arise over C'mon ride the train enrollment Train safety '□ Faculty Senate be- w INTERESTING FACTS lieves that faculty and ^■dk ' Ohio ,anks sixtfl nationally in staff need to interact addressed P^^^^^ highway-rail grade crossing with students.
    [Show full text]