DOCSLIB.ORG

Kentucky Nonpoint Source Management Plan: a Strategy for 2019-2023

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kentucky Nonpoint Source Management Plan: a Strategy for 2019-2023 Kentucky Division of Water 2019 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Kentucky Nonpoint Source Management Plan: A Strategy for 2019-2023 Draft for Public Comment Interested parties desiring to make comments may do so by emailing to: [email protected] or by mailing written comments to the: Public Notice Coordinator, Division of Water 300 Sower Blvd, 3rd Floor Frankfort, KY 40601 i | P a g e Kentucky Division of Water 2019 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Kentucky Nonpoint Source Management Plan: A Strategy for 2019-2023 Kentucky Division of Water DRAFT- April 29, 2019 The Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, or disability and provides, on request, reasonable accommodations including auxiliary aids and services necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in all services, programs and activities. ii | P a g e Kentucky Division of Water 2019 Nonpoint Source Management Plan This page intentionally left blank. iii | P a g e Kentucky Division of Water 2019 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Table of Contents List of Figures ...................................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Nonpoint Source Pollution vs. Point Source Pollution ............................................................. 9 1.2 Guiding Principles ................................................................................................................... 10 1.3 Kentucky Nonpoint Source Management Plan ....................................................................... 10 1.3.1 EPA Key Components Requirements ................................................................................. 11 1.3.2 319(h) Nonpoint Source Grants ........................................................................................... 12 1.3.3 Program Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .......................................................................... 13 2. Water Quality Monitoring ................................................................................................ 14 2.1 Monitoring Programs .............................................................................................................. 14 2.1.1 Groundwater Monitoring .................................................................................................... 14 2.1.2 Surface Water Monitoring ................................................................................................... 14 2.1.3 Biological Monitoring ........................................................................................................... 14 2.1.4 Success Monitoring .............................................................................................................. 15 2.1.5 Lake Monitoring ................................................................................................................... 15 2.1.6 National Water Quality Initiative (NWQI) ............................................................................ 15 2.1.7 Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative (MRBI) ............................................ 16 2.2 Quality Assurance (QA) ........................................................................................................... 16 2.2.1 Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) ............................................................................ 16 3. Watershed Management ................................................................................................. 17 3.1 Framework .............................................................................................................................. 18 3.2 Priority Watersheds ................................................................................................................ 19 3.3 Watershed Planning ................................................................................................................ 21 3.4 TMDL Implementation ............................................................................................................ 23 3.5 Watershed Planning Guidebook and the Kentucky Watershed Academy ............................. 23 3.6 Centers of Excellence .............................................................................................................. 23 3.8 Objectives and Action Items ................................................................................................... 24 Program Evaluation ....................................................................................................................... 25 4. Kentucky Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program Implementation ............................ 26 4.1 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 26 4.2 Program Partner Strategy ....................................................................................................... 26 4.3 Program Functional Areas ....................................................................................................... 27 5. Agriculture ...................................................................................................................... 28 5.1 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 28 5.2 DOW Strategy ......................................................................................................................... 29 iv | P a g e Kentucky Division of Water 2019 Nonpoint Source Management Plan 5.2.1 Partner Strategy ................................................................................................................... 29 5.2.2 Land Grant Institutions ........................................................................................................ 32 5.2.3 Education and Outreach ...................................................................................................... 32 5.2.4 Funding ................................................................................................................................ 34 5.3 Objectives and Action Items ................................................................................................... 35 6. Developed Lands ............................................................................................................. 38 6.1 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 38 6.2 DOW Strategy ......................................................................................................................... 38 6.2.1 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) .............................................................. 39 6.2.2 Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) ..................................................................................... 39 6.2.3 Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs) ......................................................................................... 39 6.2.4 Brownfields .......................................................................................................................... 40 6.2.5 Construction ......................................................................................................................... 40 6.2.6 Partner Strategy ................................................................................................................... 41 6.2.7 Education and Outreach ...................................................................................................... 43 Urban/Developed Lands ............................................................................................................... 43 Stormwater/MS4 .......................................................................................................................... 44 Construction .................................................................................................................................. 45 SSO/CSO ........................................................................................................................................ 45 6.2.8 Green Infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 46 6.2.9 Funding ................................................................................................................................ 46 6.3 Objectives and Action Items ................................................................................................... 47 7. Forestry ........................................................................................................................... 48 7.1 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 48 7.2 DOW Strategy ......................................................................................................................... 48 7.2.1 Partner Strategy ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of Geosynthetics in Erosion and Sediment Control: an Overview
    Geotextiles and Geomembranes I I (1992) 535-550 The Role of Geosynthetics in Erosion and Sediment Control: An Overview M. S. Theisen Erosion Control Materials, Synthetic Industries, Construction Products Division, 4019 Industry Drive, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37416, USA ABSTRACT The use ofgeosynthetic erosion and sediment materials continues to expand at a rapid pace. From their early beginnings in the late 1950s, geosynthetic materials today are the backbone of the erosion and sediment control industry. Geosynthetic components are an integral part of erosion and sediment materials ranging from temporary products such as hydraulic mulch geofibers, plastic erosion control meshes and nettings, erosion control blankets and silt fences to high performance turf reinforcement mats, geocellular confinement systems, erosion control geotextiles andfabric formed revetments. This paper provides a brief overview of these materials and concepts. INTRODUCTION Hopefully we are entering a new environmental era where concern for the protection of our planet's natural resources will reach global proportions. Continued technological advances have led to improved monitoring of Earth's vital signs. As such, prior theoretical modeling of environmental concerns such as the greenhouse effect, ozone depletion, rising sea levels, deforestation, drought, accelerated erosion, sediment loading of waterways, species extinction and the eventual downfall of mankind appear chillingly realistic. 535 536 M. S. Theisen Slogans such as 'Think globally, act locally', 'Love your mother' and 'Someone always lives downstream' are spearheading the efforts of numerous preservation groups. With the continued demise of oppressive governments, optimism for world peace and an unprecedented feeling of global unity, a spirit of environmental cooperation is beginning to prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • Audubon Bend Gravel Road Repair Gavins Point Dam, SD
    SPECIFICATIONS & DRAWINGS (Purchase Order - For Construction Contract) Solicitation Number W9128F21Q0018 ____________________________________________________________ Audubon Bend Gravel Road Repair Gavins Point Dam, SD March 2021 US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing. AUDUBON BEND GRAVEL ROAD REPAIR GAVINS POINT DAM, SD PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS 00 10 00-3 PRICING SCHEDULE STATEMENT OF WORK 00 73 00 SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS (SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS)FOR PURCHASE ORDERS DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01 22 00 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES 01 41 26.02 24 (NEBRASKA) NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM CONSTRUCTION SITES 01 57 20.00 10 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 01 57 23 TEMPORARY STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL DRAWINGS -- End of Project Table of Contents -- Page 1 This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing. Audubon Bend Gravel Road Repairs, Gavins Point Dam, NE GP82 SECTION 00 10 00 PRICING SCHEDULE CLIN DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT BASE ITEMS 0001 Mobilization and Demobilization 1 JOB XXX $_______________ Blade entire length of road surface prior to placing gravel to smooth out 0002 1 JOB XXX $_______________ scour holes, rebuild crown. Includes areas over culverts. – 4,750 FEET Reset existing 24’’ CMP with flared 0003 ends to properly drain to North East – 1 JOB XXX $_______________ 1 EACH. Install new USACE provided 48’’ 0004 culvert with flared end (includes trees’ 1 JOB XXX $_______________ removal as necessary) – 1 EACH. Reconstruct approximately 270’ of 0005 eroded road at the existing culvert 720 CY $_______________ $_______________ (includes sodding and seeding).
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Mine Water Pollution: an Acid Problem with Murky Solutions J
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 64 | Issue 3 Article 3 1976 Coal Mine Water Pollution: An Acid Problem With Murky Solutions J. T. Begley Appalachian Research and Defense Fund of Kentucky John Philip Williams East Tennessee Research Corporation Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Begley, J. T. and Williams, John Philip (1976) "Coal Mine Water Pollution: An Acid Problem With Murky Solutions," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 64 : Iss. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol64/iss3/3 This Symposium Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Coal Mine Water Pollution: an Acid Problem With Murky Solutions By J. T. BEGLEY* and JOHN PHILIP WILLIAMS** I. INTRODUCTION Since 1973 the American public has been bombarded by news of the "energy crisis" and the need for "national energy independence." This public awareness of energy needs has spurred the creation of a new federal agency, the Federal En- ergy Administration (FEA), which has initiated "Project Inde- pendence," a national program designed to achieve energy in- dependence for the United States in the 1980's.1 In speeches throughout the country, FEA officials have declared that to achieve this goal our country must double its annual coal pro- duction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Geosynthetics in Erosion and Sediment Control
    Presented at GRI-25, Geosynthetics Research Institute, Long Beach, CA, 2013 THE EVOLUTION OF GEOSYNTHETICS IN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL C. Joel Sprague TRI/Environmental, Inc., Greenville, SC ABSTRACT Much of the development of geosynthetics technology in environmental applications has been in response to government regulations. This is certainly true for geosynthetics used in erosion and sediment control. Geosynthetics continue to replace traditional materials such as soil and stone in performing important engineering functions in erosion and sediment control applications while simultaneously introducing greater versatility and cost-effectiveness. Geosynthetics are widely used as a “carrier” for degradable materials to the enhancement of vegetative establishment; as nondegradable materials to extend the erosion control limits of vegetation or soil; as primary slope or channel linings; as components in silt fences and turbidity curtains; and as a component in an ever growing array of sediment retention devices. Along with the introduction of geosynthetics into this wide range of applications has come the need for industry-wide initiatives to promote their correct use and new test methods to characterize them. All of which, are a “work in progress”. THE NEED FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS Much of the development of geosynthetics technology related to erosion and sediment control applications has been in response to government regulations. A progression of regulatory actions has brought a national focus on erosion and sediment control, including: Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (1985) - eliminating discharge of any pollutant to navigable waters. The Clean Water Act (1987) - requiring National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits for large construction sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Checklist
    Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan Checklist Page 1 of 4 What is an Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan? Erosion and sediment control is much more than silt fence and hay bales. Prior to developing an Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan (EPSCP), it is important to have minimized the areas of disturbed soils and the duration of exposure. It is also imperative to control water at up- slope site perimeters, control water on-site, control sediment on-site, and control sediment at the downslope site perimeters. An EPSCP is the final element in the erosion and sediment control planning process and a necessary component of an Act 250 permit application. The EPSCP ensures that sediment transport is addressed in one of the most crucial stages of the project: the planning stage. A good erosion prevention and sediment control plan first minimizes the extent of disturbance by focusing on erosion control (minimizing disturbed areas, seeding, mulching, matting) by controlling the amount of soil that can run off and by stabilizing exposed soil. Sediment control measures (i.e. stabilized construction entrances) then focus on any sediment that has escaped your erosion control measures. Erosion prevention measures are far more effective than sediment control measures (such as silt fence) and should be the primary focus of any EPSCP. An EPSCP has five primary components: 1. Location map (USGS and other) 2. Existing conditions site plan 3. Grading plan and construction timetable 4. Erosion prevention and sediment control site plan and timetable 5. Narrative briefly describing the four plans The location map shows the proximity of the site to any surface water bodies, roads, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin's Nonpoint Source Program Management Plan FFY 2016-2020
    WISCONSIN’S Wisconsin’s NONPOINT SOURCE approach to addressing water quality impacts from PROGRAM nonpoint source MANAGEMENT PLAN pollution. FFY 2016-2020 Approved by EPA on September 18, 2015 Wisconsin’s Nonpoint Source Program Management Plan – FFY 2016-2020 Table of Contents Acronyms & Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ 3 Chapter 1 The State of Nonpoint Source Pollution Control in Wisconsin ..................................................... 4 Chapter 2 Monitoring and Assessment ....................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 3 Watershed Planning for Nonpoint Source Pollution Control ...................................................... 30 Chapter 4 Statewide Implementation Program for Protection & Improvement of NPS Impacted Waters .. 57 Chapter 5 Tracking, Evaluation & Reporting............................................................................................... 84 Chapter 6 Future Directions - Through FFY 2020 .................................................................................... 106 2 Wisconsin’s Nonpoint Source Program Management Plan – FFY 2016-2020 Acronyms & Abbreviations Agencies, Departments and Organizations EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency FSA Farm Service Agency (part of USDA) FWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service LCD County Land Conservation Department LWCD County Land and Water Conservation Department
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Ground-Water Quality
    KENTUCKY GROUND-WATER QUALITY By James L. Kiesler, Lloyd H. Woosley, Jr., and Robert W. Davis U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 87-0727 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director - For additional information: For sale by: Chief Hydrologist U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 407 National Center Federal Center Reston, VA 22092 Box 25425 Denver, Colorado 80225 Use of trade names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey FOREWORD This report contains summary information on ground-water quality in one of the 50 States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or the Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands, Saipan, Guam, and American Samoa. The material is extracted from the manuscript of the 1986 National Water Summary, and with the exception of the illustrations, which will be reproduced in multi-color in the 1986 National Water Summary, the format and content of this report is identical to the State ground-water-quality descriptions to be published in the 1986 National Water Summary. Release of this information before formal publication in the 1986 National Water Summary permits the earliest access by the public. Contents Ground-Water Quality .................................................. 1 Water-Quality in Principal Aquifers ...................................... 1 Background Water Quality ......................................... 1 Alluvial Aquifer .............................................. 2 Tertiary and Cretaceous Aquifers ............................... 2 Pennsylvanian Aquifer System ................................. 2 Mississippian Aquifer System .................................. 2 Ordovician Aquifer System .................................... 2 Effects of Land Use on Water Quality ................................ 3 Waste Management and Chemical Storage ..................... 3 Mineral Development ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Title:Kentucky Coal, Reclamation And
    Kentucky Coal, Reclamation and Subsidence Title: Kentucky Coal, Reclamation and Subsidence Level: Secondary Day/Time: One class period or Homework assignment KERA Goals:1.2, 5.3, 6.3 Background Information: Every day, Kentuckians benefit from one of the coal industry’s most notable, environmentally significant achievements – the successful reclamation of mined lands. And chances are, they do not even know it. That is because most of the reclamation achieved by the coal industry is "invisible." Reclamation means returning the land to its original condition or other productive use. Unless there is a sign or other form of identification nearby, it is difficult to tell that a reclaimed site was once an active coal mine. Careful mining of our land benefits people in two ways: as a source of plentiful and reasonably priced coal and as reclaimed, productive, attractive and useful areas. Whether turned into a state park, a housing development, wildlife preserves or simply returned to productive farmland, reclaimed sites represent the coal industry’s commitment to a sound environment. Even though coal production has increased substantially over the past decade, the impact of this activity on the environment has been minimal. In Kentucky, coal is mined by one of two methods– surface mining or underground mining. Surface mining is the extraction of coal by first removing the soil, rock and other materials lying above the natural deposits. Underground mining is the extraction of coal by underground excavation of the coal deposits. For underground mining, special effort is devoted to constructing the mine and the mining plan in such a way that undesirable surface effect are minimized.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Geological Survey Earth Resources—Our Common Wealth
    Kentucky Geological Survey Earth ResourcesOur Common Wealth Annual Report 19992000 Annual Report 19992000 Cover Illustrations 2 1 3 4 6 5 7 À Quartz-pebble conglomerate from Cumberland Falls. Photo by Stephen Greb. Á Portion of geologic map of Harrodsburg 30 x 60 minute quadrangle, by Thomas Sparks, Garland Dever, and Warren Anderson. Â Karst landscape in central Kentucky. Photo by Deanna Davis, Barrys Photography. Ã Polished core from the CambrianOrdovician Knox Group in Cumberland County. Photo by Lyle VanHorne and Patrick Gooding. Ä Kentucky agate. Photo by Collie Rulo. Å Sandstone bluff in Carter Caves State Park. Photo by Douglas Reynolds Jr. Æ Big South Fork of the Cumberland River, McCreary County. Photo by Brandon Nuttall. Earth ResourcesOur Common Wealth Kentucky Geological Survey Annual Report 19992000 228 Mining and Mineral Resources Building University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506-0107 859.257.5500 fax 859.257.1147 www.uky.edu/KGS Project Manager and Writer: Carol Ruthven Editor: Margaret Luther Smath Designer: Collie Rulo Contents 1 Directors Desk 2 Energy and Minerals for Our Economy 8 Clean Air and Water for Our Quality of Life 14 Helping Our Communities Become Resistant to Natural Disasters 18 Enhancing Access to Geologic Maps and Data for Our Citizens 22 Upholding a Tradition of Quality Public Service 25 Mentoring Future Geologists 27 Recognizing Excellence in Research and Public Service 28 New Publications 30 Active Research Projects 32 Staff Roster State Geologists 18382000 1838: William W. Mather, State Geologist. No organizational structure. 183953: No organizational structure; no State Geologist. 185460: First Survey. David Dale Owen, State Geologist, 185457; Robert Peter, State Chemist, supervised the activities of the office from 185760.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management and Sediment and Erosion Control Plan Review Checklist for Design Professionals
    Stormwater Management and Sediment and Erosion Control Plan Review Checklist For Design Professionals This Plan Review Checklist for Design Professionals has been developed to aid those who prepare Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs). Adjacent to the heading for most sections are references from the corresponding portion of the NPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities (SCR100000), which was issued on October 15, 2012. SWPPP Preparers should not utilize this checklist as a substitute for the language in the permit and should review the permit itself for more information on each specific requirement. The permit may be found at: http://www.scdhec.gov/environment/water/swater/docs/CGP-permit.pdf In the space provided please indicate the location and page number(s) where each item below can be found in your SWPPP or supporting calculations. If an item is not applicable, put N/A. The Department reserves the right to modify this checklist at any time. The Coastal Zone consists of the following counties: Beaufort, Berkeley, Charleston, Colleton, Dorchester, Georgetown, Horry, and Jasper. *Revised Items in Red Project Information: Project Name: County: Checklist Completed by: Printed name: ___________________________ Signature: ___________________________ Date:___________ PLANS AND MAPS 1. CURRENT COMPLETED APPLICATION FORM ● Original Signature of individual with signatory authority for the applicant according to requirements set forth in R.61-9.122.22 (see Appendix C) ● All items completed and answered
    [Show full text]
  • UK Mining Engineering: Over a Century of History
    Mining Engineering Volume 03, Issue 1, Summer 2009 UK Mining Engineering: Over a Century of History During the fall a single college and the program converted of 2008, the to the Department of Mining and Metallurgy. UK Mining Department of Engineering The separate mining department was closed Mining Engineering in 1968, and the program became a specialty 230 Mining & Mineral Foundation celebrated its area in the Department of Civil Engineering. Resources Building In the later part of the 1970s, a large national Lexington, KY 40506-0107 25th anniversary. demand for mining engineers developed Phone: (859) 257-8026 During this event Fax: (859) 323-1962 it was noted that as a result of the energy crisis. In 1980 approximately 26 accredited mining engineering send correspondence to: the department has the unique programs produced over 800 mining engineers Geaunita Caylor distinction of nationwide. Under Professor Ted D. Haley’s 107 Mining and Mineral leadership, the UK mining engineering specialty Resources Building being both one Lexington, KY 40506-0107 of the oldest and area graduated 39 students in 1980, which remains the largest graduating class in the Phone: (859) 257-2820 youngest mining Fax: (859) 257-2173 history of the program. Within a four- year period Charles J. Norwood. Image courtesy of engineering from 1979 to 1982, the program produced www.engr.uky.edu/mng University of Kentucky Archives programs in the country. A brief review of the over 130 new mining engineering graduates. If you would prefer to have this newsletter sent by email, please program’s history follows. In response to the demand and request of the send your email address to [email protected] The UK Department of Mining Engineering Kentucky mining industry, the Department of was originally established in 1901 under Mining Engineering was reopened in 1981 under the direction of Professor Charles J.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Heritage Land Conservation Fund
    KENTUCKY HERITAGE LAND CONSERVATION FUND ANNUAL REPORT FY 2011 KENTUCKY HERITAGE LAND CONSERVATION FUND Kentucky has an invaluable natural heritage recognized nationally and in- ternationally for its outstanding, productive, biologically and geologically diverse lands and waters. The Kentucky Heritage Land Conservation Fund is committed to protecting these diverse lands and “Keeping Ken- tucky Green” by awarding grant funds to purchase and preserve the state’s natural lands in perpetuity for enjoyment by this and future genera- tions. Kentucky Heritage Land Conservation Fund dollars have been awarded to protect and conserve some of Kentucky’s best known natural areas: old- growth hardwoods at Blanton Forest in eastern Kentucky; savannah woodlands at Griffith Woods as well as parts of the Kentucky River Pali- sades in central Kentucky ; urban forests at the Jefferson Memorial For- est in the state’s largest city; bat populations and caves in southern Ken- tucky; cliff-lined valleys along the banks of the Martins Fork Wild River in Harlan County; and diverse watershed and wetland areas with endan- gered mussel species at the Green River State Forest in the western part of the state. On the following pages, we are pleased to present the FY 2011 Annual Report. On the Cover: Bad Branch State Nature Preserve, Letcher County Photo by Joe Dietz KHLCF FY 2011 Annual Report Table of Contents KHLCF Mission 1 KHLCF Accomplishments 2 FY 2011 in Review 3 FY 2011 Purchased Properties 4 FY 2011 Approved Projects 5 FY 2011 Financial Overview 9 Kentucky
    [Show full text]