DOCSLIB.ORG

John Jordan Work Programme Thesis.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
John Jordan Work Programme Thesis.Pdf 1 The Work Programme: Making Welfare Work? John David Jordan PhD 2016 The Work Programme: Making Welfare Work? John David Jordan A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology, the Manchester Metropolitan University Abstract This thesis provides a review of the United Kingdom’s ‘Work Programme’ as it was operating in 2014. The Work Programme was a welfare-to-work scheme rolled out nationally across mainland Britain in 2011. It was the flagship welfare programme of the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government that was formed following the UK’s general election of 2010. Welfare-to- work, alternatively known as ‘workfare’, is an approach to welfare provision which, in theory, mandates strict ‘reciprocal activity’ in return for receiving state benefits. Welfare-to-work is also increasingly associated with ‘payment-by-results’ schemes operated by private ‘providers’. Welfare-to-work has been described by numerous theorists, politicians and social commentators as a positive and revolutionary transformation of the UK’s benefits system that will re-build long-term welfare claimants’ self-esteem, re-train them via ‘tailored help and support’, and subsequently re- integrate them into the active labour market. Such claims are also often associated with the belief that past welfare systems were too generous, thereby prompting the emergence of a pathological, intergenerational underclass. Welfare-to-work is therefore argued by many to be the best solution to a crisis of social exclusion, cultural degeneration and excessive national welfare costs. However, critics characterise welfare-to-work as an essential aspect of a ‘neoliberal’ crackdown on former social democratic states. Such critics claim that this New Right ‘hardening’ of welfare policy is designed to force the UK’s labour markets to adapt to conditions of global competitiveness, lower-wages, less rights, and onerously ‘flexible’ working conditions. This thesis explores these broad and seemingly contradictory themes in both theory and also practice. More specifically, it assesses the degree to which either of these competing claims could be said to be valid for the Work Programme as it was operating within two welfare-to-work centres in the north of England in May, 2014. The thesis is based on 68 interviews with Work Programme staff and ‘customers’, foodbank managers and one anti-workfare activist. In addition, it draws on full-time fieldwork conducted over four weeks in May 2014 within two Work Programme centres. The main findings are that the Work Programme did not support the long-term unemployed into work, but also that it did not act as a punitive forced work scheme. Rather, it provided only limited contact with, and support to, claimants, and was essentially pointless in terms of improving a claimant’s chances of finding work. Dedication: For my parents, who always worked. Acknowledgements: I would like to express my gratitude to the following people and organisations, each of whom helped me to complete this thesis: My supervisors, Dr Susie Jacobs and Dr Kathryn Chadwick, for their outstanding support and guidance; plus Dr Chris Porter, the Manchester Metropolitan University, the Department of Sociology (MMU), the Institute of Humanities and Social Science Research (MMU), the MMU catering and cleaning staff – often the only people I saw first thing in the morning, for a chat and a laugh - Tracey Fishwick, the Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion, Professor Berthold Schoene, Professor Steve Miles, Professor Jenny Rowley, Professor Gary Pollock, Dr Anneke Meyer, Dr Christian Kleese, Jacqueline Eke, Kathleen Menzies, Deborah Bown, Helen Darby, Dr Anthony May, Dr Benedicte Brahic, Dr Patrick Williams, Becky Clarke, Caroline Cocker, Robert Cocker, Derek Jordan, Mavis Jordan, Joachim Jordan, Beren Jordan, Graham Trickey, Dr Ha Ngo, and my examiners, Professor Peter Dwyer and Dr Robert Ralphs. My especial gratitude goes to the participants, provider and Prime who offered their time, and/or opened their doors, to me, in a gracious spirit of openness, and of finding better answers to old problems. Contents: Chapter One: Introduction 1 1. General introduction……………………………………………... 1 2. Background………………………………………………………. 1 3. My interest in workfare…………………………………………... 3 4. The need for research…………………………………………….. 4 5. Research questions……………………………………………….. 5 6. The structure of the thesis………………………………………... 5 7. Work Programme regulations, procedures and operational practices…………………………………………………………... 7 8. Conclusion………………………………………………………... 16 Chapter Two: The Historical Development of Workfare in the United States and the United Kingdom 18 1. Introduction………………………………………………………. 18 2. The development of workfare in the United States……………… 19 3. The development of workfare in the United Kingdom…………... 34 4. Conclusion……………………………………………………….. 48 Chapter Three: Theories of Work, Welfare and Workfare 50 1. Introduction……………………………………………………… 50 2. ‘Where there is a beggar, there is a myth’: mythologies and collective representations in work and welfare………………….. 55 3. ‘A vagrant flays the skin of an opened hand’: theories of paradoxical failure……………………………………………….. 51 4. ‘The poor are the weak in the land’: The ‘Disciplinary Socialisation’ school……………………………………………... 65 5. ‘They walk the streets in shame’: the hysteresis theory of workfare………………………………………………………….. 72 6. ‘He who moves defeats poverty’: making claimants work for their dole versus ‘human capital’ approaches……………………. 73 7. ‘When a poor man walks on the streets no one greets him’: workfare and citizenship…………………………………………. 79 8. ‘Let the poor man die, let him not live’: structural poverty, discipline and exploitation……………………………………….. 85 9. Empirical studies of workfare…………………………………… 95 10. Conclusion………………………………………………………. 112 Chapter Four: Methods and Fieldwork 114 1. Introduction………………………………………………………. 114 2. Locating myself…………………………………………………... 114 3. Gathering data……………………………………………………. 116 4. Fieldwork methodology………………………………………….. 120 5. Fieldwork in practice…………………………………………….. 125 6. Conducting analysis……………………………………………… 142 7. Ethics…………………………………………………………….. 143 8. Conclusion……………………………………………………….. 146 Chapter Five: Views and Attitudes of Staff and Customers 147 1. Introduction………………………………………………………. 147 2. General opinions regarding the Work Programme………………. 148 3. Being referred……………………………………………………. 151 4. The perceived causes of unemployment…………………………. 153 5. Health Matters…………………………………………………… 156 6. Are long-term benefits claimants ‘skivers?’ ……………………. 158 7. Have the long-term unemployed have ceased active job seeking? 161 8. Employment is available, if only people are prepared to take it?... 163 9. Are benefits are too generous? ....................................................... 165 10. Are benefits linked with crime? ..................................................... 167 11. Conclusion………………………………………………………... 169 Chapter Six: Day-to-Day Operating Practices 173 1. Introduction………………………………………………………. 173 2. Review interviews………………………………………………... 173 3. ‘Job club.’………………………………………………………… 186 4. Training…………………………………………………………... 190 5. Administrative requirements……………………………………... 193 6. Conclusion………………………………………………………... 195 Chapter Seven: The ‘Anti-Workfare’ Narrative, and ‘Behind the Scenes’ of Welfare-to-Work. 199 1. Introduction………………………………………………………. 199 2. Does bullying occur? ……………………………………………. 200 3. Is the Work Programme a free labour scheme? …………………. 202 4. Parking and creaming…………………………………………….. 205 5. Sanctions…………………………………………………………. 206 6. ‘Life triage.’……………………………………………………… 212 7. An integrated approach across services? ………………………… 214 8. The problem of falling caseloads………………………………… 215 9. ‘Zero-work self-employment.’…………………………………… 216 10. Different measures of ‘success.’…………………………………. 218 11. Staff stresses and staff security…………………………………... 222 12. Leaving the programme………………………………………….. 226 13. Conclusion……………………………………………………….. 227 Chapter Eight: Discussion of Findings 230 1. Introduction………………………………………………………. 230 2. The primary ‘for’ and ‘against’ narratives, and the UK government’s workfare policy rationale…………………………. 230 3. What the data show………………………………………………. 233 4. Conclusion………………………………………………………... 257 Chapter Nine: Conclusion 261 1. Introduction………………………………………………………. 261 2. Contribution to knowledge……………………………………….. 261 3. Avenues for future research……………………………………… 262 4. Policy recommendations…………………………………………. 263 5. Final comments…………………………………………………... 264 Appendices 267 Appendix I: Ethics forms………………………………………………… 267 Appendix II: Semi-Structured Interview Questions……………………… 275 Appendix III: Participant Information Sheet and Consent Forms……….. 278 Appendix IV: Nvivo Coding Nodes……………………………………... 281 Bibliography…………………………………………………………….. 291 List of acronyms used in this thesis: AFDC Aid for Families with Dependent Children. ALMP Active Labour Market Policies. CESI Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion. CETA Comprehensive Employment and Training Act. CWA Civil Work Administration. CWTP Community Work and Training Program. DWP Department for Work and Pensions. ESA Employment and Support Allowance. ET Employment Training (scheme). FERA Federal Emergency Relief Administration. FND Flexible New Deal. GAIN Greater Avenues for Independence. HMRC Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. HTC Help Towards Work. IMF International Monetary Fund. JCP Jobcentre Plus. JOBS Job
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Leftist Case for War in Iraq •fi William Shawcross, Allies
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 27, Issue 6 2003 Article 6 Vengeance And Empire: The Leftist Case for War in Iraq – William Shawcross, Allies: The U.S., Britain, Europe, and the War in Iraq Hal Blanchard∗ ∗ Copyright c 2003 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj Vengeance And Empire: The Leftist Case for War in Iraq – William Shawcross, Allies: The U.S., Britain, Europe, and the War in Iraq Hal Blanchard Abstract Shawcross is superbly equipped to assess the impact of rogue States and terrorist organizations on global security. He is also well placed to comment on the risks of preemptive invasion for existing alliances and the future prospects for the international rule of law. An analysis of the ways in which the international community has “confronted evil,” Shawcross’ brief polemic argues that U.S. President George Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair were right to go to war without UN clearance, and that the hypocrisy of Jacques Chirac was largely responsible for the collapse of international consensus over the war. His curious identification with Bush and his neoconservative allies as the most qualified to implement this humanitarian agenda, however, fails to recognize essential differences between the leftist case for war and the hard-line justification for regime change in Iraq. BOOK REVIEW VENGEANCE AND EMPIRE: THE LEFTIST CASE FOR WAR IN IRAQ WILLIAM SHAWCROSS, ALLIES: THE U.S., BRITAIN, EUROPE, AND THE WAR IN IRAQ* Hal Blanchard** INTRODUCTION In early 2002, as the war in Afghanistan came to an end and a new interim government took power in Kabul,1 Vice President Richard Cheney was discussing with President George W.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics, Oil Law Reform, and Commodity Market Expectations
    OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 63 WINTER 2011 NUMBER 2 GEOPOLITICS, OIL LAW REFORM, AND COMMODITY MARKET EXPECTATIONS ROBERT BEJESKY * Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................... ........... 193 II. Geopolitics and Market Equilibrium . .............. 197 III. Historical U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East ................ 202 IV. Enter OPEC ..................................... ......... 210 V. Oil Industry Reform Planning for Iraq . ............... 215 VI. Occupation Announcements and Economics . ........... 228 VII. Iraq’s 2007 Oil and Gas Bill . .............. 237 VIII. Oil Price Surges . ............ 249 IX. Strategic Interests in Afghanistan . ................ 265 X. Conclusion ...................................... ......... 273 I. Introduction The 1973 oil supply shock elevated OPEC to world attention and ensconced it in the general consciousness as a confederacy that is potentially * M.A. Political Science (Michigan), M.A. Applied Economics (Michigan), LL.M. International Law (Georgetown). The author has taught international law courses for Cooley Law School and the Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan, American Government and Constitutional Law courses for Alma College, and business law courses at Central Michigan University and the University of Miami. 193 194 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 63:193 antithetical to global energy needs. From 1986 until mid-1999, prices generally fluctuated within a $10 to $20 per barrel band, but alarms sounded when market prices started hovering above $30. 1 In July 2001, Senator Arlen Specter addressed the Senate regarding the need to confront OPEC and urged President Bush to file an International Court of Justice case against the organization, on the basis that perceived antitrust violations were a breach of “general principles of law.” 2 Prices dipped initially, but began a precipitous rise in mid-March 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • In Error, Immoral, Unethical, and Impossible for Me to Attend
    Severe Bipolar Clinical Depression vs. WCA: In Error, Immoral, Unethical, and Impossible For Me To Attend Supporter Morgan Freeman, in a personal capacity Your Ref. (My NI No.): WM549438D Dear DWP/Atos Staffer, On Sat 01 June 2013, I was aghast to receive a letter, signed ‘Atos Healthcare’ (sic) and dated Thu 30 May 2013, summoning me to attend what I can only assume is the infamous and discredited ‘Work Capability Assessment’ (WCA) [1] at 15:20 on Fri 14 Jun 2013 at a ‘Marylebone Medical Assessment Centre’. The letter and accompanying pamphlet both neglect to mention the actual name of the assessment I am being summoned to attend. I am currently bumping along the bottom of an episode of severe bipolar clinical depression; so it’s taking an excessively strenuous and stressful amount of mental energy, dogged perseverance, and fitful concentration to overcome the depressive symptomatic urge to just “Bin this rubbish, and face the detrimental consequences later (which is all I deserve anyway, because I’m worthless scum)”, and rather to do the right thing: to explain to the DWP/Atos why I believe this summoning to be in error, immoral, unethical, and impossible for me to attend. So although I am currently at just about my weakest and most vulnerable, and therefore least able to self-advocate in my own best interests, I shall nevertheless take some days to assemble my considered response. Since this considered response message is both thorough and extensive, you may prefer to read it on paper rather than on screen. To that end, I have attached a version formatted for printing on A4 paper: • ‘Severe Bipolar Clinical Depression vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Failure in Afghanistan: Half-Baked Planning Or Pakistan?
    127 US FAILURE IN AFGHANISTAN: HALF-BAKED PLANNING OR PAKISTAN? Muhammad Hashim Zafar Wadhen, Shafei Moiz Hali and Adnan Jamil* Abstract The Global War on Terrorism, launched as a direct result of the heinous 9/11 attacks, has been wagging on for almost two decades with no clear signs of victory for the US. The US on a strategic level has lost the war as the primary opponent, Taliban, holds more territory than ever. The US and NATO coalition not only planned to eradicate terrorism in the country but also had great ambitions to modernize and rebuild the country; however, little has been archived so far. Amidst these harsh realities, Pakistan being a major non-NATO ally is often blamed to sabotage the war efforts by playing a so-called double-game while supporting the Global War on Terrorism on one hand and helping the Taliban on the other. Therefore, this paper investigates the reasons for the US failure in Afghanistan on a macro-level and what role Pakistan has played. Other than the notion that Pakistan is to blame, factors, such as, the US has no real long- term objectives for the war, employing conventional methods of warfare, underestimating the opponent and the terrain, lack of coordination among the NATO member states and the sudden attention shift from Afghanistan to Iraq, played a significant role in the current outcome. After evaluating all the evidence from the last two decades, it is clear that half-baked US planning led to the eventual failure of the war effort. Keywords: GWOT, Pakistan, Taliban, NATO, Terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit ‘A Windfall for Social and Environmental Justice’
    cDIREoCTIONmFOR THE pass DEMOCRATIC LEFT February 2009 Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit ‘A windfall for social and environmental justice’ By Gemma Tumelty & Jenna Khalfan Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit Introduction & Contents Rising energy and fuel prices are affecting everyone but it's the poorest and those on fixed incomes who are paying the heaviest price for the essentials of life - light and heat. This situation is unsustainable and should be challenged. Compass believes that the moment is right for the government to levy a sensible one off windfall tax on the energy and oil companies to guarantee social and environmental justice for the common good of people living today and for future generations. The government can move quickly and decisively now - but it needs to know that this is what the people want. We have developed a toolkit to help you campaign locally and nationally to have your say in this important debate. Contents 1. Briefing questions and answers 2. Key statistics 3. Campaign aims and actions 4. What you can do locally a. Get local Labour Party, Students’ Union and trade union support b. How to Lobby your MP c. Local media d. energy companies 5. Building a local coalition: pensioners groups, anti-poverty groups, church groups, fuel poverty groups, single parent networks etc Appendix 1. Who supports a windfall tax 2. Model letter to MPs 3. Model letter to the Chancellor Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit www.compassonline.org.uk PAGE 1 1. Briefing questions agreed to raise this to a £150 million a be particularly targeted at families in or and answers year by 2010, with the rate of price rises facing fuel poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham Austerity and Anti-Austerity
    University of Birmingham Austerity and anti-austerity Bailey, David; Shibata, Saori DOI: 10.1017/S0007123416000624 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Bailey, D & Shibata, S 2017, 'Austerity and anti-austerity: the political economy of refusal in ‘low resistance’ models of capitalism', British Journal of Political Science, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 683-709. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000624 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Eligibility for repository: Checked on 6/12/2016 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 Annual Report Green Alliance’S Mission Is to Promote Sustainable Development by Ensuring That the Environment Is at the Heart of Decision-Making
    1999 - 2000 annual report Green Alliance’s mission is to promote sustainable development by ensuring that the environment is at the heart of decision-making. It works with senior people in government, parliament, business and the environmental movement to encourage new ideas, dialogue and constructive solutions. Green Alliance has three main aims: . to make the environment a central political issue; . to integrate the environment effectively in public policy and decision-making; . to stimulate new thinking and advance the environmental agenda into new areas. We wish to thank Severn Trent plc for their support of this year’s annual report. Green Alliance’s publications are supported by DETR’s Environmental Action Fund. chair’s report Green Alliance’s twenty-first year, and my first year as Chair, has been a dynamic and productive one. A growing budget and staff have enabled us to play an increasingly significant role in the politics and policy of the environment in the UK. Climate change continues to pose a serious environmental challenge to politicians and policy-makers alike. Green Alliance has contributed to the UK energy policy debate on a wide range of issues, from the climate change levy to utility regulation. Our key recommendations for renewable energy have been adopted by government and our proposal for a sustainable energy agency has been endorsed by the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. Biotechnology policy, too, has remained high on the political and public agendas. Our recommendations and leading role over many years were recognised this year with the creation of the new Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission and the appointment of Julie Hill to the position of deputy chair.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflicting the Structural Violence of the Market: Workfare and Underemployment to Discipline the Reserve Army of Labor
    Fast Capitalism ISSN 1930-014X Volume 12 • Issue 1 • 2015 doi:10.32855/fcapital.201501.011 Inflicting the Structural Violence of the Market: Workfare and Underemployment to Discipline the Reserve Army of Labor Christian Garland “Taking them as a whole, the general movements of wages are exclusively regulated by the expansion and contraction of the industrial reserve army, and these again correspond to the periodic changes of the industrial cycle. They are, therefore, not determined by the variations of the absolute number of the working population, but by the varying proportions in which the working-class is divided into active and reserve army, by the increase or diminution in the relative amount of the surplus-population, by the extent to which it is now absorbed, now set free.”[2] — Marx, K. (1867) Inflicting the Structural Violence of the Market As the ongoing crisis of capitalism continues beyond its sixth year, the effects have been felt with different degrees of severity in different countries. In the UK it has manifested in chronic levels of underemployment which veil the already very high unemployment total that is currently hovering not far off the early 1980s levels of around three million. This data takes into consideration the official unemployment total and combines it with the number of Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) claimants now ‘self-employed’ who work in various odd jobs such as catalogue selling or holding an eBay account now claim Tax Credits to supplement their meager earnings. As such, “record falls in unemployment” and “record numbers in employment” are really not what they seem.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter June 2013 Contentsadvertisement HDA Newsletter June 2013 Page
    Huntington’s Disease Association Newsletter June 2013 ContentsAdvertisement HDA Newsletter June 2013 Page Message From The Chair 3 Message from the Chief Executive 4 June 2013 Newsletter Information 5 JHD Summary 6 Major Roche-Isis deal boosts Huntington’s disease gene silencing 7 Summary of prevalence of adult HD 10 Train HD Six Monthly Report 10 Liver changes in Huntington’s disease patients suggest more ‘whole body’ research needed 11 Is a new technique set to revolutionize Huntington’s disease genetic testing? 14 Impact Award 18 John Heald, former ChairmanW elcomeand Director of theto HDA 19 Awareness Week 2013 19 Recognition is the name; e-petition is the game 21 NHS Changes - Hopes & Fearsthe 69th 23 Tracing hd – a personal story 24 Personal Independence Payment issue 25 Yoga and HD 26 Young Adult Weekend 2013 of the 28 Fundraising 29 Scroll of Honour Newsletter 46 Branch Update 52 Support Groups and Branches of the HDA 53 News from the RCA Team 65 Staff Contact Details 74 Tributes 75 Forthcoming Events 2013 83 Opinions and recommendations appearing in articles within this Newsletter may not necessarily represent those of the Association. Items which include details of accommodation and services are printed in good faith. Complaints: If you are not satisfied with the services we provide please tell us. You can either do so verbally or contact Head Office for a copy of our Complaints Procedure together with the necessary form. Confidentiality and your right to be heard will be maintained. Editorial Panel: Panel: Sally Phoenix,Cath Stanley, Cath Stanley, Bill Brenda Crowder Stevenson, and Eleni Becky Zacharius Davis Message from the Chair 2013 has started where we Bakewell, Financial Accountant and our dear left in 2012; I have been friends and supporters; Professor Sarah extremely busy working Tabrizi, Professor of Clinical Neurology and with your Executive Dr Ed Wild, Clinical Lecturer in Neurology, Council Trustees.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Oldham by William Franklin Wednesday 6Th April 2011
    Letter from Oldham by William Franklin Wednesday 6th April 2011 When are the banks going to be reformed? by Michael Meacher first published on Michael Meacher’s blog on 27th March 2011 Michael Meacher is the long-serving Labour Party Member at the Westminster Parliament for the Manchester constituency of Oldham West and Royton. William Franklin stood against Michael Meacher in the Blair-Brown New Labour Landslide of May 1997 as a representative for the UK Referendum Party...and was soundly whipped...Malcolm Meacher gaining more votes than all the other candidates put together. It is astonishing that the banks, having cost the country £68bn in bailouts plus an additional £850bn in loan guarantees, asset protection schemes and enhanced liquidity, have not been reformed in any way in structure, pay, bonuses or lending. True, the Vickers Commission is due to report later this year and make some division between the investment and retail arms of banks. Or it may fudge the issue, or the Tory Party, which has been shown to get half its funding from the finance sector, may succumb to the intense lobbying from the banks to do little or nothing. So what should actually be done? An ingenious new proposal has just been put forward by two NGOs, the New Economics Foundation and Positive Money, which deserves strong support. At root it involves two reforms. One is that the bank payments system is separated from risky lending activity, so that the failure of investments cannot damage the essential bank role of providing payments to depositors. This would have prevented the crash of 2007-8; only the investors would have suffered the consequences of their own recklessness and excesses, not the taxpayers.
    [Show full text]
  • Conditionality, Activation and the Role of Psychology in UK Government Workfare Programmes Lynne Friedli,1 Robert Stearn2
    View metadata, citation and similar papersDownloaded at core.ac.uk from http://mh.bmj.com/ on June 16, 2015 - Published by group.bmj.com brought to you by CORE provided by Birkbeck Institutional Research Online Critical medical humanities Positive affect as coercive strategy: conditionality, activation and the role of psychology in UK government workfare programmes Lynne Friedli,1 Robert Stearn2 1London, UK ABSTRACT This paper considers the role of psychology in formu- 2 Department of English and Eligibility for social security benefits in many advanced lating, gaining consent for and delivering neoliberal Humanities, School of Arts, Birkbeck, University of London, economies is dependent on unemployed and welfare reform, and the ethical and political issues London, UK underemployed people carrying out an expanding range this raises. It focuses on the coercive uses of psych- of job search, training and work preparation activities, ology in UK government workfare programmes: as Correspondence to as well as mandatory unpaid labour (workfare). an explanation for unemployment (people are Dr Lynne Friedli, 22 Mayton Increasingly, these activities include interventions unemployed because they have the wrong attitude or Street, London N7 6QR, UK; [email protected] intended to modify attitudes, beliefs and personality, outlook) and as a means to achieve employability or notably through the imposition of positive affect. Labour ‘job readiness’ (possessing work-appropriate attitudes Accepted 9 February 2015 on the self in order to achieve characteristics said to and beliefs). The discourse of psychological deficit increase employability is now widely promoted. This has become an established feature of the UK policy work and the discourse on it are central to the literature on unemployment and social security and experience of many claimants and contribute to the view informs the growth of ‘psychological conditional- that unemployment is evidence of both personal failure ity’—the requirement to demonstrate certain atti- and psychological deficit.
    [Show full text]
  • Working with Ministers: a Practical Handbook on Advising, Briefing & Drafting
    Working with Ministers A practical handbook on advising, briefing & drafting A new edition of the handbook written by Christopher Jary now revised by the original author with Laura Bryant-Smith of the Policy Profession Support Unit 2 WORKING WITH MINISTERS 0-9536688-2-7 © Crown Copyright 2004 Sixth Edition Published January 2015 First edition published May 2004 Second edition published May 2005 Third edition published October 2006 Fourth edition published March 2008 Fifth edition published July 2011 This edition published November 2014 © Crown Copyright 2004 A HANDBOOK ON ADVISING, BRIEFING & DRAFTING 3 Contents Introduction to this guide 7 Chapter 1: Ministers and civil servants: Characteristics, roles and relationships 9 Chapter 2: The Private Office 30 Chapter 3: How to brief a minister 38 Chapter 4: How to draft ministers’ letters 56 Chapter 5: How to draft answers to Parliamentary Questions 70 Chapter 6: How to write ministers’ speeches 95 Chapter 7: Civil Service ethics in practice 119 Appendix 1: The Civil Service Code 134 Appendix 2: Extracts from the Ministerial Code 141 Appendix 3: Extracts from the Code of Conduct for Special Advisers 149 Annex A: Ministerial Code: The Seven Principles of Public Life 153 IndeX 155 4 WORKING WITH MINISTERS A HANDBOOK ON ADVISING, BRIEFING & DRAFTING 5 Acknowledgements In these matters, as in Michael Meacher, Terry Burns, everything else, we’re all Peter Hennessy, Dennis standing on each other’s Kavanagh, Dicky Bird, Sean Lusk, shoulders. Many colleagues, Paul Grant, Jane Foulsham, knowingly or not, have Heather Todd, Michael Partridge, contributed to this handbook. Tony Shaw, Helena Charlton, Many of the ideas that follow Francis Coxhead, Zoe McNeill- have been stolen shamelessly Ritchie, Richard Jackson, over the years from friends and Chris Carr, Michael Duggett and colleagues of all kinds: civil Brian Whalley.
    [Show full text]