DOCSLIB.ORG

Turn It and Turn It Again Studies in the Teaching and Learning of Classical Jewish Texts Jewish Identity in Post-Modern Society

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Turn It and Turn It Again Studies in the Teaching and Learning of Classical Jewish Texts Jewish Identity in Post-Modern Society Turn IT and Turn IT agaIn Studies in the Teaching and Learning of Classical Jewish Texts Jewish Identity in Post-Modern Society Series Editor: Roberta Rosenberg Farber – Yeshiva University Editorial Board: Sara Abosch – University of Memphis Geoffrey Alderman – University of Buckingham Yoram Bilu – Hebrew University Steven M. Cohen – Hebrew Union College – Jewish Institute of Religion Bryan Daves – Yeshiva University Sergio Della Pergola – Hebrew University Simcha Fishbane – Touro College Deborah Dash Moore – University of Michigan Uzi Rebhun – Hebrew University Reeva Simon – Yeshiva University Chaim I. Waxman – Rutgers University Turn IT and Turn IT agaIn Studies in the Teaching and Learning of Classical Jewish Texts Edited by Jon a. LEvISohn and SuSan P. FEndrICk Boston 2013 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: The bibliographic data for this title is available from the Library of Congress. Copyright © 2013 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-936235-63-6 (cloth) ISBN 978-1-61811-081-7 (electronic) Effective July 19, 2016, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. Cover design by Ivan Grave Published by Academic Studies Press in 2011 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com For our parents Steve and Sybil Levisohn Camille Munz Fendrick and David Fendrick And for our children Ariella, Maya, and Jesse Meira, Shoshana, Adina, Matan, and Elianna Contents Acknowledgements 8 Foreword Sharon Feiman-Nemser 11 1 Cultivating Curiosity about the Teaching of Classical Jewish Texts Jon A. Levisohn and Susan P. Fendrick 13 PART 1: Focus on Subject Matter 2 A Map of Orientations to the Teaching of Bible Barry W. Holtz 26 3 What Are the Orientations to the Teaching of Rabbinic Literature? Jon A. Levisohn 52 4 Teaching Talmudic Hermeneutics Using a Semiotic Model of Law Daniel Reifman 81 5 Neusner, Brisk, and the Stam: Significant Methodologies for Meaningful Talmud Teaching and Study Michael Chernick 105 PART 2: Focus on Teaching and Teachers 6 The Pedagogy of Slowing Down: Teaching Talmud in a Summer Kollel Jane Kanarek 128 7 Serendipity and Pedagogy: Presenting the Weekly Parashah through Rabbinic Eyes Carl M. Perkins 158 8 Introducing the Bible: The Comparative Orientation in Practice Jon A. Levisohn 186 PART 3: Focus on Learning and Learners 9 Teaching Ancient Jewish History: An Experiment in Engaged Learning Michael Satlow 212 10 “A Judaism That Does Not Hide”: Curricular Warrants for the Teaching of the Documentary Hypothesis in Community Jewish High Schools Susan E. Tanchel 236 11 Developing Student Awareness of the Talmud as an Edited Document: A Pedagogy for the Pluralistic Jewish Day School Jeffrey Spitzer 264 12 A Theory of Havruta Learning Orit Kent 286 PART 4: Focus on Context 13 “Torah Talk”: Teaching Parashat Ha-shavua to Young Children Shira Horowitz 324 14 Using the Contextual Orientation to Facilitate the Study of Bible with Generation X Beth Cousens, Susan P. Fendrick, and Jeremy S. Morrison 352 15 Academic Study of the Talmud as a Spiritual Endeavor in Rabbinic Training: Delights and Dangers Jonah Chanan Steinberg 377 16 Teaching Rabbinics as an Ethical Endeavor and Teaching Ethics as a Rabbinic Endeavor Sarra Lev 388 List of Contributors 415 Index of Biblical and Rabbinic Sources 416 General Index 418 01 Acknowledgements This book emerges from the Initiative on Bridging Scholarship and Pedagogy in Jewish Studies, a research project at the Mandel Center for Studies in Jewish Education at Brandeis University. We owe a debt of gratitude, first, to Sharon Feiman-Nemser, director of the Mandel Center, for her enthusiastic support of the project from its inception, and her wise and experienced contributions to making it both exploratory and productive. We are grateful to the participants in the two Bridging Initiative research seminars in 2003-04 and 2006-07, who responded eagerly to our invitation to explore together what the serious study of the teaching and learning of classical Jew- ish texts could look like. The enthusiastic engagement of the participants in the Bridging Initiative conferences in 2005 and 2008 reaffirmed the importance of this work and contributed depth and texture to our understanding of the teaching and learning of classical Jewish texts. The work of the project could not have proceeded without the assistance of the staff of the Mandel Center over the last several years, as it progressed from seminars and conferences, to working papers and online vid- eos, to, now, this book: Nora Abrahamer, Janna Dorfman, Liz DiNolfo, Sarah Feinberg, Galit Higgins, Kimberly Hirsh, Valorie Kopp-Aharonov, Deb Laufer, Stacie Martinez, Crystal Massuda, Gevelyn McCaskill, Marcie Quaroni, Susanne Shavelson, Em- majoy Shulman-Kumin, Angela Viehland and David Weinstein. In particular, we want to acknowledge Belina Mizrahi and Beth Polasky for their assistance with the conferences in 2005 and 2008. At Brandeis, we appreciate the support and counsel of Marc Brettler, David Wright and Sylvia Barack Fishman, in their ca- pacity as chairs of the Department of Near Eastern and Judaic Studies, and of Sylvia Fuks Fried. At Academic Studies Press, we appreciate the patience and diligence of Sharona Vedol, Kira Nemirovsky, and Danielle Padula. 8 Acknowledgements We would be remiss if we did not particularly mention Lee Shulman. Throughout the evolution of the project, over and over again, we called upon both his scholarship and his friend- ship, and neither one ever failed us. We also express our gratitude to the Mandel Foundation for its partnership with Brandeis University in creating and sup- porting the Mandel Center and its work. The conference on Teaching Rabbinic Literature in 2008 was graciously and generously supported by a grant from the Wabash Center for Teaching and Learning in Theology and Re- ligion, as well as a grant from Combined Jewish Philanthropies (CJP). Another grant, from an anonymous source, enabled the videorecording of the conference and the publication of the video footage on the web. Finally, we are grateful to Targum Shlishi, a Raquel and Aryeh Rubin Foundation, for supporting the publication of this book. A number of the chapters of the book have been revised and condensed from articles first published elsewhere. Chap- ter 2 is adapted from the third chapter in Barry Holtz, Textual Knowledge: Teaching the Bible in Theory and Practice (JTSA Press, 2003) and is reprinted by permission of JTS Press. Chapter 3 is adapted from Jon A. Levisohn, “A Menu of Orientations to the Teaching of Rabbinic Literature,” Journal of Jewish Educa- tion 76:1 (2010), and is reprinted by permission of the pub- lisher (Taylor & Francis Ltd.). Chapter 6 is adapted from Jane Kanarek, “The Pedagogy of Slowing Down: Teaching Talmud in a Summer Kollel,” Teaching Theology and Religion 13:1 (2010), and is reprinted by permission of the publisher (John Wiley and Sons, Inc.). Chapter 8 is adapted from Jon A. Levisohn, “Introducing the Contextual Orientation to the Bible: A Com- parative Study,” Journal of Jewish Education 74:1 (2008), and is reprinted by permission of the publisher (Taylor & Francis Ltd.). Chapter 9 is adapted from Michael Satlow, “Narratives or Sources? Active Learning and the Teaching of Ancient Jewish History and Texts,” Teaching Theology and Religion 15:1 (2012), and is reprinted by permission of the publisher (John Wiley and Sons, Inc.). Chapter 10 is adapted from Susan E. Tanchel, “‘A Judaism That Does Not Hide’: Teaching the Documentary 9 Acknowledgments Hypothesis in a Pluralistic Jewish High School,” Journal of Jew- ish Education 74:1 (2008), and is reprinted by permission of the publisher (Taylor & Francis Ltd.). Chapter 12 is adapted from Orit Kent, “A Theory of Havruta Learning,” Journal of Jewish Education 76:3 (2010), and is reprinted by permission of the publisher (Taylor & Francis Ltd.). Chapter 14 is adapted from Beth Cousens et al., “Using the Contextual Orientation to Fa- cilitate the Study of Bible with Generation X,” Journal of Jewish Education 74:1 (2008), and is reprinted by permission of the publisher (Taylor & Francis Ltd.). Foreword Sharon Feiman-Nemser Kiddushin 40b: Rabbi Tarfon and the Elders were once re- clining in the upper story of Nitza’s house in Lod, when this question was raised before them: “Is study greater, or practice?” Rabbi Tarfon answered, saying: “Practice is greater.” Rabbi Akiba answered, saying: “Study is greater.” Then they all answered and said: “Study is greater, for study leads to practice.” Writing this Foreword is a particularly pleasurable task because Turn It and Turn It Again, the first book from the Mandel Center for Studies in Jewish Education at Brandeis University, captures so much of what the Center is about. Since its founding in 2002, the Mandel Center has become the address for serious research on teaching and learning in Jewish education. This collection of studies by thoughtful teachers of Bible and rabbinic literature exemplifies a new tradition of scholarship in Jewish education and demonstrates how the study of practice can lead to improved practice. An early project of the Mandel Center, the Initiative on Bridging Scholarship and Pedagogy in Jewish Studies was established to give teachers of Jewish studies—wherever and whomever they teach—the opportunity to explore how to create transformative learning experi- ences for their students. Led by Jon Levisohn, it brought together scholars and Jewish educators in seminars and conferences to work on questions of pedagogy and to understand better how research can strengthen practice. Besides introducing participants to research on the teaching and learning of specific subjects, the project supported teach- ers from diverse institutional settings and educational levels in studying some aspect of their teaching and/or their students’ learning.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Whiteheadian Interpretation of the Zoharic Creation Story
    A WHITEHEADIAN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZOHARIC CREATION STORY by Michael Gold A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida May 2016 Copyright 2016 by Michael Gold ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express sincere gratitude to his committee members, Professors Marina Banchetti, Frederick E. Greenspahn, Kristen Lindbeck, and Eitan Fishbane for their encouragement and support throughout this project. iv ABSTRACT Author: Michael Gold Title: A Whiteheadian Interpretation of the Zoharic Creation Story Institution: Florida Atlantic University Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Marina P. Banchetti Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Year: 2016 This dissertation presents a Whiteheadian interpretation of the notions of mind, immanence and process as they are addressed in the Zohar. According to many scholars, this kabbalistic creation story as portrayed in the Zohar is a reaction to the earlier rabbinic concept of God qua creator, which emphasized divine transcendence over divine immanence. The medieval Jewish philosophers, particularly Maimonides influenced by Aristotle, placed particular emphasis on divine transcendence, seeing a radical separation between Creator and creation. With this in mind, these scholars claim that one of the goals of the Zohar’s creation story was to emphasize God’s immanence within creation. Similar to the Zohar, the process metaphysics of Alfred North Whitehead and his followers was reacting to the substance metaphysics that had dominated Western philosophy as far back as ancient Greek thought. Whitehead adopts a very similar narrative to that of the Zohar.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense in Zephaniah: an Intertextual Reading John De Jong
    Making Sense in Zephaniah: An Intertextual Reading John de Jong A thesis submitted to Auckland University of Technology in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) 2015 Faculty of Culture and Society through Laidlaw College i Abstract The question this thesis answers is, “How does an intertextual reading contribute to interpreting the book of Zephaniah?” To answer this question the thesis examines the ways in which Zephaniah takes up other texts as it constructs its own message. After the introduction, chapters 2 to 4 address the theory of intertextuality, methodological issues in an intertextual reading of the OT in general, and historical-critical aspects of Zephaniah. Exegesis of Zephaniah constitutes the main body of the thesis (chapters 5-7), proceeding one pericope at a time in analysing the effect intertextual allusion and echo have on the signification of the text. This intertextual reading reveals that the first oracle, Zeph 1.2-3, is key to understanding the entire book of Zephaniah. Allusion to the creation- flood account in Genesis 1-9 carries into the text of Zephaniah the concept of representation. Just as humanity represented God in the primeval times and humanity’s failure resulted in universal judgment, in Zephaniah the failure of the people of God likewise results in universal judgment. This concept of representation enables the book of Zephaniah to be read as a cohesive text which makes sense from beginning to end. The relationship between Judah and the nations in Zephaniah is a difficulty which has led scholars to emending the text and/or attributing what appear to be logical inconsistencies to redactional adjustments to the original Zephaniah text.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BENJAMIN and ROSE BERGER TORAH TO-GO® Established by Rabbi Hyman and Ann Arbesfeld April 2016 • Pesach-Yom Haatzmaut 5776
    Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary Yeshiva University Center for the Jewish Future THE BENJAMIN AND ROSE BERGER TORAH TO-GO® Established by Rabbi Hyman and Ann Arbesfeld April 2016 • Pesach-Yom Haatzmaut 5776 Dedicated in memory of Cantor Jerome L. Simons Featuring Divrei Torah from Rabbi Benjamin Blech • Rabbi Reuven Brand Rabbi Daniel Z. Feldman • Rabbi Aaron Goldscheider Rabbi Yona Reiss • Mrs. Shoshana Schechter • Rabbi Mordechai Torczyner Ilana Turetsky, Ed.D • Rabbi Daniel Yolkut Insights on the Pesach Seder from the Rabbinic Alumni Committee of the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary Rabbi Binyamin Blau • Rabbi Eliezer Muskin • Rabbi Moshe Neiss Rabbi Shmuel Silber • Rabbi Eliezer Zwickler Insights on Yom Haatzmaut from Rabbi Nissim Abrin • Rabbi David Bigman • Mrs. Dina Blank Rabbi Jesse Horn • Rabbi Shaya Karlinsky • Rabbi Moshe Lichtman Rabbi Chaim Pollock • Rabbi Azriel Rosner • Rabbi Ari Shvat 1 Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary • The Benjamin and Rose Berger CJF Torah To-Go Series • Pesach 5776 We thank the following synagogues who have pledged to be Pillars of the Torah To-Go® project Congregation Ahavas Congregation Young Israel of Achim Shaarei Tefillah Century City Highland Park, NJ Newton Centre, MA Los Angeles, CA Congregation Ahavath The Jewish Center Young Israel of Torah New York, NY New Hyde Park Englewood, NJ New Hyde Park, NY Young Israel of Beth El in Congregation Beth Boro Park Young Israel of Shalom Brooklyn, NY West Hempstead Rochester, NY West Hempstead, NY Richard M. Joel, President
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Interpretation in the Pesharim
    CHAPTER 7 Structure and Interpretation in the Pesharim The macro-structure of the hypomnemata and the Pesharim is largely similar. Yet one difference is that the Pesharim are at times more lenient in their dis- tinction between lemmata and interpretation sections. This leniency will be discussed in the third section of this chapter. The other sections offer a sepa- rate treatment of lemmata and interpretation sections in the Pesharim, fol- lowed by a discussion of their connection. 1 Lemmata: Selection and Presentation The Pesharim quote prophetic base texts in their lemmata.1 Not all prophetic texts lend themselves to interpretation in a Pesher, though. Even if it remains a possibility that Pesharim on writings other than Isaiah, Hosea, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, and Psalms2 once existed, the surviving Pesharim re- flect a more than accidental preference for these prophetic writings in particu- lar. The principles that govern this preference escape one-sided explanations.3 In my view, three principles of selection can be distinguished, which together account for the existence of Pesharim on some prophetic writings, but not on others: (1) the contents of the base texts; (2) the type of textual and literary development of which it is considered to be a part; and (3) its structure.4 1 Cf. pp. 238–39, where it is argued that the words of ancient prophets were generally under- stood in the Second Temple period to be addressed not just to the contemporaries of the prophets, but also to later generations. 2 At least some Psalms were considered prophetic in the Second Temple period.
    [Show full text]
  • Scripture in History, Literature, Thought, and Culture
    Scripture in History, Literature, Thought, and Culture (A Comparative Exam in the Committee on Historical Studies) General description: The exam is designed to test competence in the study of the reception of scripture in history, literature, thought, and culture. Students taking this exam will be required to show mastery of traditional areas in reception history, such as the history of exegesis and hermeneutical theories. They will also be asked to branch out into less traditional areas of enquiry, such as the history of the book; historiography; thematic studies of biblical texts, ideas, or motifs across time or religious culture; scripture in society, politics, ethics, popular culture, material culture (e.g., art and architecture), mass media, etc. General requirements: To foster a broad and innovative approach to scripture and scriptural traditions, the examination requires preparation on two levels (general and specific), with three supporting bibliographies. In Part I, each student must read and master a set corpus of general studies which have been chosen to exemplify the diversity of possible approaches to scripture in history, literature, thought, and culture. Part II requires each student to specialize in at least two areas from a comparative perspective (broadly defined). The comparison can be construed across time, across religion or culture, or across discipline (examples are given below). Part III requires the development of a list of primary sources to support Part II. Students will develop the specializations and reading lists in Parts II-III together with a committee of two faculty members (including at least one of the core faculty listed below). They are also encouraged to participate in the biannual colloquium on Scripture in History, Literature, Thought, and Culture, to be taught by the core faculty.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BIBLE in the JEWISH MYSTICAL TRADITION Michael
    THE BIBLE IN THE JEWISH MYSTICAL TRADITION Michael Fishbane The Hebrew Bible, Sacred Scripture, is the core text of Jewish religious cul­ ture, the foundational document of its creative life in every respect. All of its contents—from the opening account of the creation to concluding tra­ ditions about national exile and return, with emphasis on the lives of its religious leaders and the legal traditions recorded in the Torah, plus its col­ lections of prayer and wisdom teachings—all these comprise the authorita­ tive canon of Judaism. This written record was complemented from biblical antiquity to the present day by an oral tradition, for its understanding and interpretation in a wide variety of ways and contexts. Commentary is thus a core practice of Jewish religious culture; and the Hebrew Bible is its prin­ cipal subject and prooftext. Much of this commentary, beginning with legal and theological midrash in rabbinic antiquity, was grounded in the ongoing study and preaching of Scripture. Originally oral in both form and function, it was eventually written down, and supplemented by further study and other written traditions—for the past two thousand years. The Jewish mystical tradition is also founded upon Scripture. This is its primary subject and prooftext. The many rabbinic comments on Scripture are also woven into the mystical imagination, for Scripture was always read in Judaism through rabbinic lenses. Built upon these foundations, the Jewish mystical tradition is thus fundamentally a tradition of commentary. This anchors the mystical spirit and imagination in the sources of revela­ tion and tradition. It keeps its soaring spirit and imagination normative.
    [Show full text]
  • Vorträge Und Schwerpunkte
    “You may NEITHER ADD TO IT NOR TAKE AWAy from it” (DEUT. 13:1): LEGAl REVISION AND HERMENEUTICS IN THE HEBREW BIBlE1 BERNARD M. LEVINSON The idea of a scriptural canon is one of the most distinctive achievements of many major re- ligions, both Western (Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam)¯ and Eastern (the Pa¯li canon of Theravada¯ Buddhism).2 By locating its font of revelation or contemplative in- sight in a canon of foundational sources, however, a culture confronts an almost inevitable difficulty.T he essence of a canon is that it should be stable, self-sufficient, and delimited.F or example, in the book of Deuteronomy in the Bible, Moses twice admonishes his addressees: “You must not add anything to what I command you nor take anything away from it, but shall keep the commandments of Yahweh your God” (Deuteronomy 4:2; similarly 13:1 [Eng- lish, 12:32]). This so-called canon formula had a long prehistory in the ancient Near East, where it originally sought to prevent royal inscriptions, law collections, and treaties from be- ing altered.3 Only subsequently was it taken over by Deuteronomy’s Israelite authors and 1 Lecture held at the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin on October 30, 2007. 2 For a fuller presentation of the matters discussed here, see my Legal Revision and Religious Renewal in An- cient Israel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008). In a shorter, German-language version: idem, “ ‘Du sollst nichts hinzufügen und nichts wegnehmen’ (Dtn 13,1): Rechtsreform und Hermeneutik in der Hebräischen Bibel,” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 102 (2006): 157–183.
    [Show full text]
  • A. the Tanak As the Foundation of Judaism
    A. THE TANAK AS THE FOUNDATION OF JUDAISM THE TANAK, OR THE JEWISH BIBLE, stands as the quintessential foundation for Jewish life, identity, practice, and thought from antiquity through contemporary times. The five books of the Torah, or the Instruction of G-d to the Jewish people and the world at large, constitute the foundation of the Tanak. According to Jewish tradition (Exod 19—Num 10), the Torah was revealed to the nation Israel at Mount Sinai while the people were journeying from Egypt through the wilderness of Sinai on their way to return to the land of Israel to take up residence in the land promised by G-d to their ancestors, Abraham and Sarah; Isaac and Rebecca; Jacob, Rachel and Leah; and the twelve sons of Jacob. The four books of the Nevi’im Rishonim, or the Former Prophets, provide an account of Israel’s life in the land from the time of the conquest under Joshua until the time of the Babylonian exile, when Jerusalem and the Temple were destroyed and Jews were exiled to Babylonia and elsewhere in the world. The four books of the Nevi’im Ahronim, or the Latter Prophets, provide an assessment of the reasons why G-d chose to exile Jews from the land of Israel and the scenarios by which G-d would choose to restore Jews to the land of Israel once the exile was completed. The eleven books of the Ketuvim, or the Writings, include a variety of books of different form and purpose that address various aspects of Jewish worship, critical thought, future expectations, history, and life in the world, both in the land of Israel and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • 22992/RA Indexes
    INDEX of the PROCEEDINGS of THE RABBINICAL ASSEMBLY ❦ INDEX of the PROCEEDINGS of THE RABBINICAL ASSEMBLY ❦ Volumes 1–62 1927–2000 Annette Muffs Botnick Copyright © 2006 by The Rabbinical Assembly ISBN 0-916219-35-6 All rights reserved. No part of the text may be reproduced in any form, nor may any page be photographed and reproduced, without written permission of the publisher. Manufactured in the United States of America Designed by G&H SOHO, Inc. CONTENTS Preface . vii Subject Index . 1 Author Index . 193 Book Reviews . 303 v PREFACE The goal of this cumulative index is two-fold. It is to serve as an historical reference to the conventions of the Rabbinical Assembly and to the statements, thoughts, and dreams of the leaders of the Conser- vative movement. It is also to provide newer members of the Rabbinical Assembly, and all readers, with insights into questions, problems, and situations today that are often reminiscent of or have a basis in the past. The entries are arranged chronologically within each author’s listing. The authors are arranged alphabetically. I’ve tried to incorporate as many individuals who spoke on a subject as possible, as well as included prefaces, content notes, and appendices. Indices generally do not contain page references to these entries, and I readily admit that it isn’t the professional form. However, because these indices are cumulative, I felt that they were, in a sense, an historical set of records of the growth of the Conservative movement through the twentieth century, and that pro- fessional indexers will forgive these lapses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Torah U-Madda Journal Devoted to the Interaction Between Torah and General Culture
    THE TORAH U-MADDA JOUR NAL DEVOTED TO THE INTERACTION BETWEEN JUDAISM AND GENERAL CULTURE EDITOR : DAVID SHATZ EDITORIAL ASSISTANT : MEIRA MINTZ FOUNDING EDITOR : JACOB J. SCHACTER , 1989–1999 VOLUME EIGHTEEN • 2020-21 The Torah u-Madda Journal Devoted to the interaction between Torah and general culture. Copyright © 2021 Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary, an affiliate of Yeshiva University. David Shatz, Editor Meira Mintz, Editorial Assistant Jacob J. Schacter, Founding Editor A publication of The Torah u-Madda Project Max Stern Division of Communal Services Center for the Jewish Future Yeshiva University 500 West 185th Street New York, NY 10033 The Torah u-Madda Project gratefully acknowledges the support of the Joseph J. and Bertha K. Green Memorial Fund at the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary. The Torah u-Madda Journal publishes articles that either (1) address the question of Judaism’s relationship to general culture, whether in the broad sense or in the context of a specific discipline or field; or (2) exemplify the integration of Jewish and general knowledge in the treat - ment of a specific topic. Correspondence should be sent to Dr. David Shatz at [email protected]. Back issues of the journal are available online at www.yutorah.org. Design and production by David Olivestone PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA p This issue is dedicated in memory of Rabbi Dr. Norman Lamm and Mrs. Mindella Lamm הרב נחום בן מאיר שמואל ופעריל מינדל בת שלום וטויבע העסא ת u נ u צ u ב u ה p A A q q Rabbi Dr. Norman Lamm zz.
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Generation of Modern Orthodoxy
    The Next Generation of Modern Orthodoxy Next Generation.indb 1 4/3/12 3:43 PM Chancellor of Yeshiva University, meets each year to consider major issues of concern to the Jewish community. Forum participants from throughout the world, including academicians in both Jewish and ah, Jewish educators, and Jewish communal professionals, gather in conference as a think tank to and disseminate a new and vibrant Torah literature addressing the critical issues facing Jewry today. gratefully acknowledges the support of the Joseph J. and Bertha K. Green Memorial Fund established by Morris L. Green, of blessed memory. OF 19 r10 draft 08 balanced.indd ii 9/23/2008 8:19:37 AM Next Generation.indb 2 4/3/12 3:43 PM The Next Generation of Modern Orthodoxy EditEd by Shmuel Hain Robert S. Hirt, Series Editor the michael scharf publication trust of the yeshiva university press new york Next Generation.indb 3 4/3/12 3:43 PM Copyright © 2012 Yeshiva University Press Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The next generation of modern orthodoxy / edited by Shmuel Hain. p. cm. -- (Orthodox Forum series) Includes index. ISBN 978-1-60280-206-3 1. Orthodox Judaism--Congresses. 2. Judaism--21st century--Congresses. I. Hain, Shmuel. BM30.N49 2012 296.8’32--dc23 2012013967 Distributed by KTAV Publishing House, Inc. 888 Newark Avenue Jersey City, NJ 07306 [email protected] www.ktav.com (201) 963-9524 Fax (201) 963-0102 v Next Generation front-chp 11 rev 2.indd 4 4/10/12 10:16 AM Contents Contributors xi Series Editor’s Preface xvii Robert S.
    [Show full text]
  • Left-Wing Rabbis Call Rav Shlomo Zalman's Shitah on Organ
    Left-Wing Rabbis Call Rav Shlomo Zalman’s Shitah On Organ Donation “Morally Untenable” Wednesday January 12, 2011 5:20 PM - 55 Comments A group of about 100 rabbis has issued a statement regarding organ donation, a topic that has garnered much attention in recent months. The crux of the statement is that adopting a restrictive position regarding donating organs and a permissive position regarding receiving organs is morally untenable. “Such an approach,” the rabbis claim, “is also highly damaging to the State of Israel, both internally and in regards to its relationship with the larger world, and to the Jewish People as a whole. The rabbis state that this approach, which is the shitah of Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach and other gedolei haposkim, “must thus be unequivocally rejected by Jews at the individual and the communal level.” The following is the full statement and the signatories: Rabbinic Statement Regarding Organ Donation We, the undersigned Orthodox rabbis and rashei yeshiva affirm the following principles with regard to organ donation and brain stem death: First and foremost, the halakhic definition of death is a long-standing debate amongst gedolei haposkim, and it should not be forgotten that, among others in the U.S. and Israel, the former Chief Rabbis of Israel, R. Avraham Shapira and R. Mordechai Eliyahu, zikhronam li’vracha, and, yibadel li’chayim, Rav Gedalia Dov Schwartz, the av beis din of the Beit Din of America, are proponents of the position that brain stem death constitutes the halakhic definition of death. Both positions, that brain stem death constitutes death, and that only cardiac death can define death, are halakhically viable.
    [Show full text]