DOCSLIB.ORG

Shell Sustainability Report 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shell Sustainability Report 2012 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Royal Dutch Shell plc Sustainability Report 2013 02 30 CONTENTS OUR APPROACH OUR PERFORMANCE 03 Introduction from the CEO 31 Economic 04 Building a sustainable energy future 32 Environmental 05 Sustainability and our business strategy 34 Social 06 Living by our principles 36 Environmental and social data 07 Safety 38 External Review Committee 08 Communities 40 About our reporting 09 Environment 41 About our data 10 Climate change 11 Focus on: Carbon capture and storage 12 OUR ACTIVITIES 13 Sustainable development in Shell 14 Natural gas 15 Tight gas and oil 16 Liquefi ed natural gas 17 Contractors, suppliers and joint ventures 18 Deep water 19 Iraq 20 Alaska 22 Nigeria 25 Focus on: Partners and collaboration 26 Oil sands 27 Focus on: Technology and innovation 28 Fuels and products 29 Biofuels Cover photo Scientists use 3D technology to review seismic data to help locate oil and gas reservoirs. Rijswijk, the Netherlands. New Lens Scenarios disclaimer venture, partnership or company, after exclusion of all fi scal and regulatory developments including regulatory This publication contains data from Shell’s New Lens third-party interest. This publication contains forward- measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and Scenarios. The New Lens Scenarios are a part of an looking statements concerning the fi nancial condition, fi nancial market conditions in various countries and ongoing process used in Shell for 40 years to challenge results of operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of executives’ perspectives on the future business All statements other than statements of historical fact are, expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts environment. We base them on plausible assumptions or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the and quantifi cation, and they are designed to stretch Forward-looking statements are statements of future approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for management to consider events that may only be remotely expectations that are based on management’s current shared costs; and (m) changes in trading conditions. All possible. Scenarios, therefore, are not intended to be expectations and assumptions and involve known and forward-looking statements contained in this publication predictions of likely future events or outcomes and investors unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual are expressly qualifi ed in their entirety by the cautionary should not rely on them when making an investment results, performance or events to differ materially from statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers decision with regards to Royal Dutch Shell plc securities. those expressed or implied in these statements. should not place undue reliance on forward-looking Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements. Additional risk factors that may affect future Cautionary note statements concerning the potential exposure of Royal results are contained in Royal Dutch Shell’s 20-F for the The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and Dutch Shell to market risks and statements expressing year ended December 31, 2013 (available at www.shell. indirectly owns investments are separate entities. In this management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, com/investor and www.sec.gov). These risk factors also publication “Shell”, “Shell group” and “Royal Dutch Shell” projections and assumptions. These forward-looking expressly qualify all forward-looking statements contained are sometimes used for convenience where references are statements are identifi ed by their use of terms and phrases in this publication and should be considered by the reader. made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “could”, “estimate”, Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also “expect”, “goals”, “intend”, “may”, “objectives”, “outlook”, of this publication, April 9, 2014. Neither Royal Dutch used to refer to subsidiaries in general or to those who “plan”, “probably”, “project”, “risks”, “schedule”, “seek”, Shell plc nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any work for them. These expressions are also used where no “should”, “target”, “will” and similar terms and phrases. obligation to publicly update or revise any forward- useful purpose is served by identifying the particular There are a number of factors that could affect the future looking statement as a result of new information, future company or companies. “Subsidiaries”, “Shell operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those events or other information. In light of these risks, results subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this results to differ materially from those expressed in the could differ materially from those stated, implied or publication refer to companies over which Royal Dutch forward-looking statements included in this publication, inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in Shell plc either directly or indirectly has control. including (without limitation): (a) price fl uctuations in crude this publication. We may have used certain terms, such as Companies over which Shell has joint control are generally oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell’s resources, in this publication that United States Securities referred to “joint ventures” and companies over which products; (c) currency fl uctuations; (d) drilling and and Exchange Commission (SEC) strictly prohibits us from Shell has signifi cant infl uence but neither control nor joint production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market including in our fi lings with the SEC. U.S. Investors are control are referred to as “associates”. In this publication, share and industry competition; (g) environmental and urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, joint ventures and associates may also be referred to as physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identifi cation of File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website “equity-accounted investments”. The term “Shell interest” is suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and www.sec.gov. You can also obtain these forms from the used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; SEC by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. (for example, through our 23% shareholding in Woodside (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and Petroleum Ltd.) ownership interest held by Shell in a countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, INTRODUCTION 01 SHELL SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2013 OUR BUSINESSES Producing oil Mining oil sands and gas Exploring for oil Extracting and gas bitumen Refining oil into fuels and lubricants Producing petrochemicals Producing biofuels Developing fields Supply and Shipping distribution and trading Converting gas to liquid products (GTL) Generating B2B sales Shipping wind power and trading Chemical products for plastics, Regasifying LNG Liquefying gas coatings, detergents by cooling (LNG) Retail sales Fuels and lubricants for transport B2B sales Retail sales Gas for cooking, heating, electrical power ABOUT SHELL Shell is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies employing 92,000 people Projects and Technology in more than 70 countries. Our aim is to help meet the energy needs of society in ways that Projects and Technology is overall accountable for are economically, environmentally and socially responsible. wells engineering and wells completion, for project engineering and project execution. It drives the Upstream International and gas to market. Upstream Americas also extracts research and innovation to create technology Upstream International manages the Upstream bitumen from oil sands that is converted into solutions. It provides technical services and business outside the Americas. It searches for and synthetic crude oil. Its activities are managed technology capability covering both upstream and recovers crude oil, natural gas and natural gas primarily by lines of business which are logically downstream activities. It is responsible for providing liquids, liquefi es and transports gas, and operates combined activities underpinned by strategic functional leadership across Shell in the areas of the upstream and midstream infrastructure necessary themes. The wind power activities in the USA are safety, environment and social performance as well to deliver oil and gas to market. Its activities are part of Upstream Americas. as contracting and procurement. managed primarily by lines of business which are logically combined activities underpinned by Downstream www.shell.com/about strategic themes. Downstream manages the manufacturing, supply, distribution and marketing activities for oil products, Upstream Americas biofuels and chemicals. These activities are Upstream Americas manages the Upstream business organised into globally managed classes of in North and South America. It searches for and business. Downstream trades Shell’s fl ow of recovers crude oil, natural gas and natural gas hydrocarbons and other energy-related products. liquids, transports gas and operates the upstream It also oversees Shell’s interests in alternative energy, and midstream infrastructure necessary to deliver oil excluding wind. OUR APPROACH Shell works to help meet the world’s growing demand for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2013 Financial and Operating Review
    Financial & Operating Review 2 013 Financial & Operating Summary 1 Delivering Profitable Growth 3 Global Operations 14 Upstream 16 Downstream 58 Chemical 72 Financial Information 82 Frequently Used Terms 90 Index 94 General Information 95 COVER PHOTO: Liquefied natural gas (LNG) produced at our joint ventures with Qatar Petroleum is transported to global markets at constant temperature and pressure by dedicated carriers designed and built to meet the most rigorous safety standards. Statements of future events or conditions in this report, including projections, targets, expectations, estimates, and business plans, are forward-looking statements. Actual future results, including demand growth and energy mix; capacity growth; the impact of new technologies; capital expenditures; project plans, dates, costs, and capacities; resource additions, production rates, and resource recoveries; efficiency gains; cost savings; product sales; and financial results could differ materially due to, for example, changes in oil and gas prices or other market conditions affecting the oil and gas industry; reservoir performance; timely completion of development projects; war and other political or security disturbances; changes in law or government regulation; the actions of competitors and customers; unexpected technological developments; general economic conditions, including the occurrence and duration of economic recessions; the outcome of commercial negotiations; unforeseen technical difficulties; unanticipated operational disruptions; and other factors discussed in this report and in Item 1A of ExxonMobil’s most recent Form 10-K. Definitions of certain financial and operating measures and other terms used in this report are contained in the section titled “Frequently Used Terms” on pages 90 through 93. In the case of financial measures, the definitions also include information required by SEC Regulation G.
    [Show full text]
  • World Oil Production and Peaking Outlook.Pdf
    Peak Oil Netherlands Foundation (PONL) was founded in May 2005 by a group of citizens who are concerned about the effects of a premature peak in oil and other fossil fuels production. The main aims of PONL are to carry out research and to raise awareness with respect to the depletion of non-renewable energy sources. PONL currently relies on volunteers for its activities. To safeguard its independency, PONL does not accept donations from companies involved in the development of either fossil fuels or alternative sources. The author of this report, Rembrandt Koppelaar, would like to thank the editors of this report, the other people in the Peak Oil Netherlands Foundation for their work, peakoil.com & the oildrum community, C. Campbell for raising the peakoil issue since the early days, R. Heinberg for providing the first Peak Oil book the author did read, J. Laherrère for his splendid papers, M. Simmons for raising awareness regarding peakoil to new heights and writing his book, M. Lynch for his fresh insights regarding peakoil, C. Skrebowksi and CERA for making their oil project reports and last but certainly not least his family from whom he has learned a considerable amount . © 2005 Peak Oil Netherlands Foundation. All rights reserved. Reproduction for non-commercial purposes is allowed. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 - GLOSSARY OF TERMS -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Dutch Shell and Its Sustainability Troubles
    Royal Dutch Shell and its sustainability troubles Background report to the Erratum of Shell's Annual Report 2010 Albert ten Kate May 2011 1 Colophon Title: Royal Dutch Shell and its sustainability troubles Background report to the Erratum of Shell's Annual Report 2010 May 2011. This report is made on behalf of Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands) Author: Albert ten Kate, free-lance researcher corporate social responsibility Pesthuislaan 61 1054 RH Amsterdam phone: (+31)(0)20 489 29 88 mobile: (+31)(0)6 185 68 354 e-mail: [email protected] 2 Contents Introduction 4 Methodology 5 Cases: 1. Muddling through in Nigeria 6 1a) oil spills 1b) primitive gas flaring 1c) conflict and corruption 2. Denial of Brazilian pesticide diseases 14 3. Mining the Canadian tar sands 17 4. The bitter taste of Brazil's sugarcane 20 4a) sourcing sugarcane from occupiers of indigenous land 4b) bad labour conditions sugarcane harvesters 4c) massive monoculture land use 5. Fracking unconventional gas 29 6. Climate change, a business case? 35 7. Interfering with politics 38 8. Drilling plans Alaska’s Arctic Ocean 42 9. Sakhalin: the last 130 Western Gray Whales 45 10. The risky Kashagan oil field 47 11. A toxic legacy in Curaçao 49 12. Philippines: an oil depot amidst a crowd of people 52 3 Introduction Measured in revenue, Royal Dutch Shell is one of the biggest companies in the world. According to its annual report of 2010, its revenue amounted to USD 368 billion in 2010. Shell produces oil and gas in 30 countries, spread over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Gas Giveaway
    Giving Away The Gas 26/05/2009 17:31 Page 1 The Great Gas Giveaway How the elites have gambled with our health and wealth An Afri Report Giving Away The Gas 26/05/2009 17:31 Page 2 Andy Storey and Michael McCaughan Giving Away The Gas 26/05/2009 17:31 Page 3 Giving away the gas “We gave the Corrib gas away and now Éamon Ryan is intent on giving away the remaining choice areas of our offshore acreage at less than bargain basement prices”. 1 An international study in 2002 found that only Cameroon took a lower share of the revenues from its own oil or gas resources than Ireland – the vast majority of countries demand that multinational oil and gas companies pay the state proportionately twice the amount that the Irish government is extracting from the Shell-led consortium that is exploiting the Corrib gas field. Ghana, for example, insists that the state-owned Ghanaian National Petroleum Corporation has a 10 per cent ownership stake in any resource find and the multinationals are also liable to a 50 per cent profits tax. Ireland, by contrast, demands no state shareholding in any resource finds, nor does it demand royalty payments. A generous (to the companies) tax rate of only 25 per cent applies – and even that low tax rate only kicks in after a company’s exploration and development costs (and the estimated costs of closing down the operation when the resources are depleted) have been recovered.2 The Corrib gas field will probably be half depleted before any tax is paid at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria's Oil and Gas Revenues
    Briefing December 2017 Nigeria’s Oil and Gas Revenues: Insights From New Company Disclosures Alexander Malden Nigeria is one of the largest and oldest oil producers in Africa, with over 50 years of commercial extractive activity. Until recently, however, citizens within the country have not had sufficient information to hold companies or government entities accountable for billions of dollars of oil and gas revenues, nor to begin to assess the costs, benefits and management of the country’s extractive activities. Box 1. Summary of European and Canadian mandatory disclosure laws Which companies must Oil, gas or mining companies1 registered in or listed on a regulated stock disclose? exchange in Canada, the European Union or European Economic Area.2 What must they Payments made to governments (including state owned enterprises) in disclose? relation to extractive activities. Payments should be attributed to projects where applicable.3 1. Production entitlements 2. Taxes (on income, production or profits) 3. Royalties 4. Dividends 5. Signature, discovery and production bonuses 6. License fees 7. Payments for infrastructure improvements What is the threshold Single, or series of, payments that amount to EUR 100,000 in the EU/EEA for payment reporting? or CAD 100,000 in Canada. When must they EU. The date of the first required report from a company depends on when disclose? the EU Member State enacted the relevant provisions of the European Accounting and Transparency Directives.4 Canada. The Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act came into force on 1 June 2015 and applies to any financial year starting after this date. Companies have 150 days after the end of their financial year to file their Payments to Governments Report.
    [Show full text]
  • World Oil Product & Peaking Outlook
    Peak Oil Netherlands Foundation (PONL) was founded in May 2005 by a group of citizens who are concerned about the effects of a premature peak in oil and other fossil fuels production. The main aims of PONL are to carry out research and to raise awareness with respect to the depletion of non-renewable energy sources. PONL currently relies on volunteers for its activities. To safeguard its independency, PONL does not accept donations from companies involved in the development of either fossil fuels or alternative sources. The author of this report, Rembrandt Koppelaar, would like to thank the editors of this report, the other people in the Peak Oil Netherlands Foundation for their work, peakoil.com & the oildrum community, C. Campbell for raising the peakoil issue since the early days, R. Heinberg for providing the first Peak Oil book the author did read, J. Laherrère for his splendid papers, M. Simmons for raising awareness regarding peakoil to new heights and writing his book, M. Lynch for his fresh insights regarding peakoil, C. Skrebowksi and CERA for making their oil project reports and last but certainly not least his family from whom he has learned a considerable amount . © 2005 Peak Oil Netherlands Foundation. All rights reserved. Reproduction for non-commercial purposes is allowed. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 - GLOSSARY OF TERMS -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Shell Annual Report and Form 20-F
    ANNUAL REPORT Royal Dutch Shell plc Annual Report and Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 01 106 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 01 Form 20-F AND SUPPLEMENTS 02 Cross reference to Form 20-F 106 Consolidated Financial Statements 04 Terms and abbreviations 153 Supplementary information – oil and 05 About this Report gas (unaudited) 173 Parent Company Financial Statements 06 185 Royal Dutch Shell Dividend Access Trust STRATEGIC REPORT Financial Statements 06 Chairman’s message 07 Chief Executive Officer’s review 190 08 Risk factors ADDITIONAL 13 Business overview INFORMATION 15 Strategy and outlook 190 Shareholder information 16 Market overview 197 Section 13(r) of the US Securities 18 Summary of results Exchange Act of 1934 disclosure 20 Performance indicators 198 Non-GAAP measures reconciliations 22 Selected financial data and other definitions 23 Upstream 200 Exhibits 41 Downstream 48 Corporate 49 Liquidity and capital resources Cover images 53 Environment and society 60 Our people The cover shows some of the ways that Shell helps to meet the world’s diverse energy needs – from supplying gas for cooking, heating, 62 and generating electricity for GOVERNANCE homes and businesses, to liquefied natural gas (LNG) to fuel trucks 62 The Board of Royal Dutch Shell plc and ships. Pearl, the world’s largest 65 Senior Management gas-to-liquids (GTL) plant, makes 66 Directors’ Report lubricants, fuels and products for 69 Corporate governance plastics. Prelude, the world’s largest floating LNG facility, will produce 83 Audit Committee Report LNG off the coast of Australia. 86 Directors’ Remuneration Report Designed by Conran Design Group carbon neutral natureOffice.com | NL-215-168617 Typeset by RR Donnelley print production Printed by Tuijtel under ISO 14001 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Corrib Gas Controversy: Beyond ‘David and Goliath’ Analyses of a Resource Conflict
    Assessing the Corrib gas controversy: Beyond ‘David and Goliath’ analyses of a resource conflict Slevin, A. (2019). Assessing the Corrib gas controversy: Beyond ‘David and Goliath’ analyses of a resource conflict. The Extractive Industries and Society, 6(2), 519-530. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.exis.2018.11.004 Published in: The Extractive Industries and Society Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2018 The Authors. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/,which permits distribution and reproduction for non-commercial purposes, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:26. Sep. 2021 Assessing the Corrib gas controversy: Beyond ‘David and Goliath’ analyses of a resource conflict Abstract Since its discovery offshore Ireland in 1996, Corrib gas has become synonymous with controversy and social- ecological upheaval.
    [Show full text]
  • Eni Fact Book 2020
    Eni Fact Book 2020 ENI AT A GLANCE 2 Main data 4 Eni share performance 7 EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION 9 GLOBAL GAS & LNG PORTFOLIO 47 REFINING & MARKETING AND CHEMICALS 54 Refining & Marketing 55 Chemicals 65 ENI GAS E LUCE, POWER & RENEWABLES 69 Eni gas e luce 69 Power 71 Renewables 72 TABLES 75 Financial data 75 Employees 87 Quarterly information 88 Disclaimer Eni’s Fact Book is a supplement to Eni’s Annual Report and is designed to provide supplemental financial and operating information. It contains certain forward-looking statements regarding capital expenditures, dividends, buy-back programs, allocation of future cash flow from operations, financial structure evolution, future operating performance, targets of production and sale growth and the progress and timing of projects. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will or may occur in the future. Actual results may differ from those expressed in such statements, depending on a variety of factors, including the impact of the pandemic disease; the timing of bringing new oil and gas fields on stream; management’s ability in carrying out industrial plans and in succeeding in commercial transactions; future levels of industry product supply; demand and oil and natural gas pricing; operational problems; general macroeconomic conditions; political stability and economic growth in relevant areas of the world; changes in laws and governmental regulations; development and use of new technology;
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Summary Annual Report to Our Shareholders
    2003 Summary Annual Report To Our Shareholders Inside In 2003, ExxonMobil delivered Several major upstream projects the strongest earnings performance commenced production, including To Our Shareholders 1 in the corporation’s history. We those in Norway, Chad, Angola and Technology 3 achieved net income of $21.5 billion Equatorial Guinea. Still other major Upstream 5 and cash flow from operations projects are being progressed to Downstream 15 and asset sales of $30.8 billion. deliver profitable long-term hydrocar- Return on capital employed stood bon resources for the corporation, Chemical 23 at an industry-leading 21 percent. including those in Qatar, Angola, Corporate Citizenship 27 Our strong business performance Russia, Norway, Malaysia and the Financial Summary 31 continues to provide leading returns United States. In the downstream Investor Information 42 to shareholders while advancing the business, earnings improved dramati- corporation’s core strategies with our cally. We made significant progress ongoing investments in the business. in expanding our capacity to produce Note: The term upstream refers to exploration, development, production, gas and power mar- low-sulfur gasolines and strengthened keting, and U.S. coal businesses or activities. The corporation has paid a dividend our position as the world’s foremost Downstream refers to the refining and market- ing of petroleum products such as motor fuels every year for more than a century. supplier and marketer of motor fuels and lubricants. During 2003, we increased annual and lubricants. Our chemical business Projections, targets, estimates and business dividend payments for the 21st con- continued to improve profitability plans in this report are forward-looking state- ments.
    [Show full text]
  • BONGA SPM Closing Spool Installation Shell
    PROJECT EXPERIENCE www.ariosh.com/projects BONGA SPM Closing Spool Services Installation As-Built Documentation, Shell Nigeria Exploration & Production Company Fabrication Assurance, Virtual Installation The Bonga field situated in OML 118 lies 120 km to the South West of Warri, on the continental slope in the southern part of the Niger Delta in approximately 1000 meter depth of water. The license is operated on behalf of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) by Shell Nigeria Exploration and Location Production Company Limited (SNEPCo) in partnership with Exxon, Agip and Total. The field development consist of a spread moored Floating Production Bonga Offshore Field Storage and Offloading (FPSO) to which a network of subsea tress and associated hardware are connected to facilitate oil production from and water injection into the reservoir. Oil is exported from the field after processing on the FPSO through the flexible Safety Record offloading risers and Single Point Mooring (SPM) tanker loading system while the gas produced is exported via a pipeline to the Offshore Gas Gathering Zero LTI System (OGGS), where it is commingled with gas from the EA field and transported to shore at the Bonny Island LNG Facility, which is operated by Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas Limited. Total Man-hours Ariosh was contracted to carry out laser survey on the space between the spools before the valves and the face of BOOR of the SPM Center-well. This 956hrs is to be able to generate drawings needed to fabricate the closing spools between the valve and the BOOR head. Status Laser Data was collected on the Valves and BOORS Center-well for virtual installation purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • 04-Cpi-Corrib-Controversy-Report.Pdf
    editorial CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INQUIRY Fiosrú An Phobail Dublin November 2005 The second report of the Centre for Public Inquiry concerns the Corrib gas project and the associated pipeline and processing plant proposed for the Erris peninsula in north west County Mayo. The jailing of five men from Ros Dumhach in the county Mayo Gaeltacht during the summer of 2005 has focused national attention on the proposal to run a gas pipeline from the sea bed 80 kilometres offshore to a gas processing plant at Ballinaboy Bridge. A separate document researched and written by Residents of the area have expressed deep staff at the Centre for Public Inquiry examines the concerns over the safety of the proposed pipeline background to the Corrib Gas controversy, the which runs within 70 metres of people’s homes history, since the early 1970s, of Ireland’s and over the suitability of the location of the relationship with the oil and gas industry and the proposed processing plant to be constructed on legislative and other changes made over the bog land acquired by the Corrib consortium which period. The conclusions of this study raise serious is comprised of Shell E&P Ireland Ltd, Statoil and questions about the manner in which the Corrib Marathon, three global players in the international gas project has proceeded in relation to its oil and gas industry. The campaign and the planning and legislative aspects. response by both the Government and the corporations involved has also highlighted the The report will be forwarded to Mr Noel Dempsey, manner in which successive governments have the Minister for Communications, Marine and granted major fiscal and licensing concessions to Natural Resources who currently holds the oil and gas majors over a thirty year period.
    [Show full text]