DOCSLIB.ORG

Apollo 11 PAGE 20-34

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Apollo 11 PAGE 20-34 AIR SAFETY 36 AEROPUZZLER 8 TRENDING 9 Defeating MCAS Flying inverted Predicting aircraft electric needs Homo sapiens astronauta Should we modify our bodies for deep space travel? Here’s how it might be done. PAGE 10 Apollo 11 PAGE 20-34 JULY/AUGUST 2019 | A publication of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics | aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org INFLUENCE THE FUTURE OF SPACE COMMERCE AND GOVERNANCE 70TH INTERNATIONAL ASTRONAUTICAL CONGRESS WASHINGTON D.C. 2019 I N 21–25 OCTOBER 2019 S T S E E R R Walter E. Washington Convention Center, Washington, D.C. N G A N T I O O C N A L L C A A T I S T R O N A U LIMITED EXPOSITION SPACE AVAILABLE 92% SOLD OUT – ACT NOW ENGAGE: Thousands of U.S. and international delegates from industry, government, and academia, including the world’s most influential experts, innovative technologists, and decision makers. INFLUENCE: Meet policymakers and their staff to share your organizations past contributions and future successes during Public Policy Day. STAND OUT: Enhance your presence on a global stage through sponsorships that fit any budget, promoting your brand in unique ways. Don’t miss the World’s Premier Global Space Event! GET STARTED TODAY iac2019.org/exhibit-and-sponsor SPACE: The Power of the Past, the Promise of the Future ORGANIZERS PARTNERS INDUSTRY ANCHOR SPONSOR IAA I S ‧ NT IAA I IAA I C ‧ E S ‧ NT S NT I R C ‧ E C ‧ ‧ E T I R I R U N T T A N N A U U A A T A N A T T I O N N O I I O O N O O R N N A T R R A L A T S T A L L S S A A A C F A A A O C D C F F Y E M A A O O D D Y E Y E M M FEATURES | July/August 2019 20 36 42 10 Why Apollo 11 Learning from Putting robots Homo sapiens still matters the MAX on the moon When Neil Armstrong The investigations A robotic “meet up” astronauta and Buzz Aldrin into two fatal with astronauts could landed on the moon, crashes continue, enhance NASA’s 2024 Manipulating human genes to it was so much more and one focus is pilot lunar mission. enhance astronauts’ ability to live than a technological training for handling beyond the magnetosphere may achievement. emergencies caused By Gordon Roesler become the next step in preparing by automation. By John M. Logsdon them for work in deep space. By Jan Tegler By Adam Hadhazy Above: NASA astronaut Anne McClain participates in an experiment onboard the International Space Station. Image credit: NASA aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org | JULY/AUGUST 2019 | 1 WILLIAM H. PICKERING LECTURE Rocketing to the Future: Space Electric Propulsion 19 August 2019 | JW Marriott, Indianapolis, Indiana OPEN TO THE PUBLIC One of NASA’s most remarkable interplanetary missions, the Dawn Eight deep-space exploration missions with electric propulsion spacecraft, used ion propulsion to orbit and explore the two have been launched and yet we have just scratched the surface largest uncharted worlds in the inner solar system, dwarf planet of what electric propulsion can do. Under development in 20 Ceres (2015–2018) and protoplanet Vesta (2011–2012). Dawn is countries around the world, electric propulsion will continue to the only spacecraft ever to orbit a body in the main asteroid see widespread use on commercial communication satellites belt, the only spacecraft to orbit a dwarf planet, and the only with likely prolific use in large constellations in low altitude spacecraft to orbit two extraterrestrial destinations. Dawn’s orbits. It will be used for exciting new deep-space robotic mission would have been impossible without its xenon-fueled ion science missions. Higher power versions are expected to benefit propulsion system, which ultimately provided a total effective all forms of planetary defense techniques, human missions to velocity change of 11.5 km/s (25,700 miles per hour) — comparable Mars, and asteroid mining, and advanced versions will ultimately to that provided by the entire three-stage Delta II launch enable rapid transportation throughout the solar system. vehicle that started the spacecraft on its deep-space journey. The Pickering Lecture will describe this extraordinary space Ion propulsion is a type of space electric propulsion, a technology propulsion technology and how Dawn and other missions take that has now been used on nearly 600 spacecraft. Over 40% advantage of it to accomplish amazing interplanetary adventures. of commercial geosynchronous satellites launched in recent years rely on the extraordinary capability of this technology. aiaa.org/PickeringLecture2019 SPEAKERS: JOHN BROPHY MARC RAYMAN Expert in Space Electric Dawn Mission Director, Propulsion, JPL Fellow JPL Chief Engineer for Operations and Science, JPL Fellow The William H. Pickering Lecture is named for the former NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Director, to honor his initiation and leadership of America’s unmanned scientific space program, from Explorer I in 1958 through the development of the Viking orbiters and the Voyager outer planet and interstellar missions. The lecture is open to all attendees and the general public. IN THIS ISSUE AEROSPACE★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ AMERICA JULY/AUGUST 2019, VOL. 57, NO. 7 EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Adam Hadhazy Ben Iannotta Adam reports on astrophysics and technology. His work has appeared in [email protected] Discover and New Scientist magazines. ASSOCIATE EDITOR PAGE 10 Karen Small [email protected] STAFF REPORTER Cat Hofacker John M. Logsdon [email protected] John is professor emeritus at George Washington University and has written EDITOR, AIAA BULLETIN Christine Williams books on the space policies of U.S. Presidents Kennedy, Nixon and Reagan. He founded GW’s Space Policy Institute in 1987 and directed it until 2008. [email protected] He is editor of “The Penguin Book of Outer Space Exploration.” EDITOR EMERITUS PAGE 20 Jerry Grey CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Adam Hadhazy, John M. Logsdon, Jan Tegler Robert van der Linden, Jan Tegler, Debra Werner, Jan covers a variety of subjects, including defense, for publications internationally. Frank H. Winter He’s a frequent contributor to Defense Media Network/Faircount Media Group and is the author of the book “B-47 Stratojet: Boeing’s Brilliant Bomber,” as well as a John Langford AIAA PRESIDENT general aviation pilot. Daniel L. Dumbacher PUBLISHER PAGE 36 Rodger S. Williams DEPUTY PUBLISHER ADVERTISING [email protected] Debra Werner ART DIRECTION AND DESIGN A frequent contributor to Aerospace America, Debra is also a West Coast THOR Design Studio | thor.design correspondent for Space News. PAGES 28, 64 MANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTION Association Vision | associationvision.com LETTERS AND CORRESPONDENCE Ben Iannotta, [email protected] DEPARTMENTS 4 Editor’s Notebook 5 8 7 Flight Path Letter to editor AeroPuzzler Aerospace America (ISSN 0740-722X) is published monthly Consider Murphy’s law Flying inverted worked in that except in August by the American Institute of Aeronautics when planning for one Denzel Washington movie, and Astronautics, Inc., at 12700 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 49 AIAA Bulletin urban air mobility but what about real life? 200 Reston, VA 20191-5807 [703-264-7500]. Subscription rate is 50% of dues for AIAA members (and is not deductible therefrom). Nonmember subscription price: U.S., $200; 61 Career Opportunities foreign, $220. Single copies $20 each. Postmaster: Send 9 35, 62 address changes and subscription orders to Aerospace America, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Trending Looking Back at 12700 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA, 20191-5807, New software predicts an Moon-landing coverage from Attn: A.I.A.A. Customer Service. Periodical postage aircraft’s electrical power 1969 and aviation milestones paid at Reston, Virginia, and at additional mailing demand during fl ight during World War II offi ces. Copyright 2019 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., all rights reserved. The name Aerospace America is registered by the AIAA in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Offi ce. 64 Trajectories A movie inspired a small-town Virginia boy to become a NASA engineer aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org | JULY/AUGUST 2019 | 3 EDITOR’S NOTEBOOK HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT Apollo 11 and what’s ahead or this issue, we did not deliberate long over whether to make our Apollo 11 anniversary section An artist’s impression the cover story. As important as it is to look back at the moon landing 50 years ago in July [see of the European Space pages 20-35], we decided that the cover should air a possible solution to the greatest obstacle to Agency’s Heracles spacecraft arriving at the humans living and working in deep space. proposed lunar Gateway. Human biology cannot survive for very long outside of Earth’s protective magnetosphere. European Space Agency FHumans would be pummeled by deadly radiation if we tried to set up shop permanently on Mars or elsewhere in the solar system. Today, humanity doesn’t actually have the choice outlined by Jeff Bezos when he accepted the 2016 Collier Trophy on behalf of his company Blue Origin. “Either we stay here on Earth and have this civiliza- tion of stasis, or we expand into the solar system and have a dynamic, exciting civilization of exploration and pioneering,” Bezos said. Toying with our genes sounds like an outlandish way to expand into the solar system. But colonization sounds outlandish too, so maybe the answer needs to match. Of course, there could be other answers. If Earth can create a magnetosphere, perhaps humans can too. Or maybe the solution lies in materials and structures or in taking shelter in natural structures such as volcanic caverns. Whatever the answer, advocates of space colonization should make sure that humans can survive in deep space, less their ex- uberance draws more money than warranted to the fun stuff like deep space rovers, transports, mining tools and habitats.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    Annotated List of Works Cited Primary Sources Newspapers “Apollo 11 se Vraci na Zemi.” Rude Pravo [Czechoslovakia] 22 July 1969. 1. Print. This was helpful for us because it showed how the U.S. wasn’t the only ones effected by this event. This added more to our project so we had views from outside the US. Barbuor, John. “Alunizaron, Bajaron, Caminaron, Trabajaron: Proeza Lograda.” Excelsior [Mexico] 21 July 1969. 1. Print. The front page of this newspaper was extremely helpful to our project because we used it to see how this event impacted the whole world not just America. Beloff, Nora. “The Space Race: Experts Not Keen on Getting a Man on the Moon.” Age [Melbourne] 24 April 1962. 2. Print. This was an incredibly important article to use in out presentation so that we could see different opinions. This article talked about how some people did not want to go to the moon; we didn’t find many articles like this one. In most everything we have read it talks about the advantages of going to the moon. This is why this article was so unique and important. Canadian Press. “Half-billion Watch the Moon Spectacular.” Gazette [Montreal] 21 July 1969. 4. Print. This source gave us a clear idea about how big this event really was, not only was it a big deal in America, but everywhere else in the world. This article told how Russia and China didn’t have TV’s so they had to find other ways to hear about this event like listening to the radio.
    [Show full text]
  • How USAF's Missile Program Helped the Nation Off the Pad
    Iii ANNIVERSARY There was no lack of rocketry art when Sputnik jolted the US and the free world. The Army, Navy, and Air Force had all been working with missiles for some years, and many rocket spe- cialists had foreseen the future significance of space. But the national capabilities were splintered. As NASA came into being, with a strong need for large-scale program know-how, it was the Air Force, fresh from its missile management experience, that could offer the most useful aid in getting the space program under way . How USAF's Missile Program Helped the Nation off the Pad BY WILLIAM LEA VITT ASSOCIATE EDITOR, AIR FORCE/SPACE DIGEST "From this effort has emerged not only the major portion of our national missile force but also the prime base of technology and management skill underpinning the total national space effort. Many of our space accomplishments to date—both military and civilian—simply could not have been undertaken successfully with- out the prior experience gained in the Air Force missile development program." —SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE EUGENE M. ZUCKERT T IS a fact, documented in the public prints, Just one aspect of this sizable Air Force role has in congressional reports, and above all, on been the large number of Air Force officers who have launch pads and tracking sites around the served the National Aeronautics and Space Adminis- world, that the US Air Force has made mas- tration on direct loan or in supportive Air Force efforts, sive contributions of men, hardware, and since the civilian space agency's establishment in 1958.
    [Show full text]
  • Return to the Moon Mission Overview
    Return to the Moon Mission Overview The new millennium is still young, but humans using the lastest in transport technology to are preparing to Return to the Moon, reduce the travel time. In addition to verifying spurred on by the verification of ice water on the best site for the establishment of the the lunar surface by Lunar Prospector in lunar base, during the course of the mission, 1998. Composed of hydrogen and oxygen – the crew will recover a probe that is the elements that make up water – the lunar stranded in space and access the damage to ice provides a core resource for long-term the probe, and then build and launch an human presence on the lunar surface. equipment module to the lunar surface. Lunar Prospector was followed by a series of Some information has been previously successful robotic missions designed to obtained from the potential lunar base sites. probe the concept that the ice water could A detailed study has determined that the be harvested. Once collected, the ice water base site must contain solid, metals, and can be turned into drinking water, oxygen for potentially useful resources such as helium-3. life support of a lunar base, nutrients as the Rock and soil samples, soil composition, and basis for agriculture, components needed for seismic information have been gathered by rocket fuel, or when combined with lunar soil, previous missions from a portion of the the basics for construction materials. Not potential sites. Experiments on soil and rock only did those robotic missions successfully samples from other possible sites must be prove that concept, but since then, additional performed in order to determine the best robotic staging missions have landed and site for the lunar base.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Tribute to George Low –“The Ultimate Engineer”
    Book Tribute to George Low –“The Ultimate Engineer” The Ultimate Engineer: The Remarkable Life of NASA's Visionary Leader George M. Low by Richard Jurek Foreword by Gerald D. Griffin From the late 1950s to 1976 the U.S. manned spaceflight program advanced as it did largely due to the extraordinary efforts of Austrian immigrant George M. Low. Described as the "ultimate engineer" during his career at NASA, Low was a visionary architect and leader from the agency's inception in 1958 to his retirement in 1976. As chief of manned spaceflight at NASA, Low was instrumental in the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs. Low's pioneering work paved the way for President Kennedy's decision to make a lunar landing NASA's primary goal in the 1960s. After the tragic 1967 Apollo I fire that took the lives of three astronauts and almost crippled the program, Low took charge of the redesign of the Apollo spacecraft, and helped lead the program from disaster and toward the moon. In 1968, Low made the bold decision to go for lunar orbit on Apollo 8 before the lunar module was ready for flight and after only one Earth orbit test flight of the Command and Service modules. Under Low there were five manned missions, including Apollo 11, the first manned lunar landing. Low's clandestine negotiations with the Soviet Union resulted in a historic joint mission in 1975 that was the precursor to the Shuttle-MIR and International Space Station programs. At the end of his NASA career, Low was one of the leading figures in the development of the Space Shuttle in the early1970s, and was instrumental in NASA's transition into a post-Apollo world.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting, Tracking and Imaging Space Debris
    r bulletin 109 — february 2002 Detecting, Tracking and Imaging Space Debris D. Mehrholz, L. Leushacke FGAN Research Institute for High-Frequency Physics and Radar Techniques, Wachtberg, Germany W. Flury, R. Jehn, H. Klinkrad, M. Landgraf European Space Operations Centre (ESOC), Darmstadt, Germany Earth’s space-debris environment tracked, with estimates for the number of Today’s man-made space-debris environment objects larger than 1 cm ranging from 100 000 has been created by the space activities to 200 000. that have taken place since Sputnik’s launch in 1957. There have been more than 4000 The sources of this debris are normal launch rocket launches since then, as well as many operations (Fig. 2), certain operations in space, other related debris-generating occurrences fragmentations as a result of explosions and such as more than 150 in-orbit fragmentation collisions in space, firings of satellite solid- events. rocket motors, material ageing effects, and leaking thermal-control systems. Solid-rocket Among the more than 8700 objects larger than 10 cm in Earth orbits, motors use aluminium as a catalyst (about 15% only about 6% are operational satellites and the remainder is space by mass) and when burning they emit debris. Europe currently has no operational space surveillance aluminium-oxide particles typically 1 to 10 system, but a powerful radar facility for the detection and tracking of microns in size. In addition, centimetre-sized space debris and the imaging of space objects is available in the form objects are formed by metallic aluminium melts, of the 34 m dish radar at the Research Establishment for Applied called ‘slag’.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo Spacecraft
    APOLLO NEWS REFERENCE APOLLO SPACECRAFT The Apollo spacecraft comprises the lunar occupies the right flight station. The astronauts module, the command module, theservice module, transfer to the ascent stage, through the docking the spacecraft-lunar module adapter, and the tunne l, after the LM has docked with the CM and launch escape system. The five parts, 82 feet tall both have attained lunar orbit. The ascent stage when assembled, are carried atop the launch comprises three major areas: crew compartment, vehicle. midsection, and aft equipment bay. The cabin, comprising the crew compartment and midsection, After the launch escape system and the launch has an overa ll volume of 235 cubic feet. vehicle have been jettisoned, the three modu les remain to form the basic spacecraft. The command module carries the three astronauts to and from Because the LM is operated in either the weight­ lunar orbit. The service modu le contains the pro­ lessness of space or in lunar gravity, the cabin pulsion system that propels the spacecraft during contains harness- like restraint equipment rather the trans lunar and transearth flights. The lunar than the foldable couches provided in the CM. The module carries two astronauts, the Commander restraints al low the astronauts sufficient freedom and the Lunar Module Pilot, to and from the of movement to operate al l LM controls while in a moon, and serves as the base of operations during re lativelyupright position. the lunar stay. LUNAR MODULE The lunar module wil l be operated in the vacuum of space; there was no need, therefore,for it to have the aerodynamic symmetry of the com· mand module.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6.Qxd
    CHAPTER 6: The NASA Family The melding of all of the NASA centers, contractors, universities, and often strong personalities associated with each of them into the productive and efficient organization necessary to complete NASA’s space missions became both more critical and more difficult as NASA turned its attention from Gemini to Apollo. The approach and style and, indeed, the personality of each NASA center differed sharply. The Manned Spacecraft Center was distinctive among all the rest. Fortune magazine suggested in 1967 that the scale of NASA’s operation required a whole new approach and style of management: “To master such massively complex and expensive problems, the agency has mobilized some 20,000 individual firms, more than 400,000 workers, and 200 colleges and universities in a combine of the most advanced resources of American civilization.” The author referred to some of the eight NASA centers and assorted field installations as “pockets of sovereignty” which exercised an enormous degree of independence and autonomy.1 An enduring part of the management problem throughout the Mercury and Gemini programs that became compounded under Apollo, because of its greater technical challenges, was the diversity and distinctiveness of each of the NASA centers. The diverse cultures and capabilities represented by each of the centers were at once the space program’s greatest resource and its Achilles’ heel. NASA was a hybrid organization. At its heart was Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory established by Congress in 1917 near Hampton, Virginia, and formally dedicated in 1920. It became the Langley Research Center. Langley created the Ames Aeronautical Laboratory at Moffett Field, California, in 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Human-System Interface Design for a Lunar Access Vehicle
    Conceptual Human-System Interface Design for a Lunar Access Vehicle Mary Cummings Enlie Wang Cristin Smith Jessica Marquez Mark Duppen Stephane Essama Massachusetts Institute of Technology* Prepared For Draper Labs Award #: SC001-018 PI: Dava Newman HAL2005-04 September, 2005 http://halab.mit.edu e-mail: [email protected] *MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Cambridge, MA 02139 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE GENERAL FRAMEWORK................................................................................ 1 1.2 ORGANIZATION.................................................................................................... 2 2 H-SI BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION ........................................................ 3 2.1 APOLLO VS. LAV H-SI........................................................................................ 3 2.2 APOLLO VS. LUNAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS ...................................................... 4 3 THE LAV CONCEPTUAL PROTOTYPE............................................................ 5 3.1 HS-I DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................ 5 3.2 THE CONCEPTUAL PROTOTYPE ............................................................................ 6 3.3 LANDING ZONE (LZ) DISPLAY............................................................................. 8 3.3.1 LZ Display Introduction.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 11 Astronaut Neil Armstrong Broadcast from the Moon (July 21, 1969) Added to the National Registry: 2004 Essay by Cary O’Dell
    Apollo 11 Astronaut Neil Armstrong Broadcast from the Moon (July 21, 1969) Added to the National Registry: 2004 Essay by Cary O’Dell “One small step for…” Though no American has stepped onto the surface of the moon since 1972, the exiting of the Earth’s atmosphere today is almost commonplace. Once covered live over all TV and radio networks, increasingly US space launches have been relegated to a fleeting mention on the nightly news, if mentioned at all. But there was a time when leaving the planet got the full attention it deserved. Certainly it did in July of 1969 when an American man, Neil Armstrong, became the first human being to ever step foot on the moon’s surface. The pictures he took and the reports he sent back to Earth stopped the world in its tracks, especially his eloquent opening salvo which became as famous and as known to most citizens as any words ever spoken. The mid-1969 mission of NASA’s Apollo 11 mission became the defining moment of the US- USSR “Space Race” usually dated as the period between 1957 and 1975 when the world’s two superpowers were competing to top each other in technological advances and scientific knowledge (and bragging rights) related to, truly, the “final frontier.” There were three astronauts on the Apollo 11 spacecraft, the US’s fifth manned spaced mission, and the third lunar mission of the Apollo program. They were: Neil Armstrong, Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin, and Michael Collins. The trio was launched from Kennedy Space Center in Florida on July 16, 1969 at 1:32pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthrise- Contents and Chapter 1
    EARTHRISE: HOW MAN FIRST SAW THE EARTH Contents 1. Earthrise, seen for the first time by human eyes 2. Apollo 8: from the Moon to the Earth 3. A Short History of the Whole Earth 4. From Landscape to Planet 5. Blue Marble 6. An Astronaut’s View of Earth 7. From Cold War to Open Skies 8. From Spaceship Earth to Mother Earth 9. Gaia 10. The Discovery of the Earth 1. Earthrise, seen for the first time by human eyes On Christmas Eve 1968 three American astronauts were in orbit around the Moon: Frank Borman, James Lovell, and Bill Anders. The crew of Apollo 8 had been declared by the United Nations to be the ‘envoys of mankind in outer space’; they were also its eyes.1 They were already the first people to leave Earth orbit, the first to set eyes on the whole Earth, and the first to see the dark side of the Moon, but the most powerful experience still awaited them. For three orbits they gazed down on the lunar surface through their capsule’s tiny windows as they carried out the checks and observations prescribed for almost every minute of this tightly-planned mission. On the fourth orbit, as they began to emerge from the far side of the Moon, something happened. They were still out of radio contact with the Earth, but the on- board voice recorder captured their excitement. Borman: Oh my God! Look at that picture over there! Here’s the Earth coming up. Wow, that is pretty! Anders: Hey, don’t take that, it’s not scheduled.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moon Is a Harsh Chromatogram: the Most Strategic Knowledge Gap (Skg) at the Lunar Surface E
    50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2019 (LPI Contrib. No. 2132) 2766.pdf THE MOON IS A HARSH CHROMATOGRAM: THE MOST STRATEGIC KNOWLEDGE GAP (SKG) AT THE LUNAR SURFACE E. Patrick, R. Blase, M. Libardoni, Southwest Research Institute®, 6220 Culebra Rd., San Antonio, TX 78238 ([email protected]) Introduction: Data from analytical instruments de- a gas chromatograph mass spectrometer (GCMS) and ployed during multiple lunar missions, combined with revealed 97% of the composition in that mass channel laboratory results[1], suggest the regolith surface of the to be N2. Henderson et al.[5] also identified amino ac- Moon traps more volatiles in gas-surface interactions ids which were attributed to contamination, but results than is currently understood. We assert that the lunar from recent more sensitive LCMS and GCMS experi- surface behaves as a giant 3-D surface chromatogram, ments by Elsila et al.[1] found some amino acid and separating gas molecules by species as each wafts other organic signatures to be extraterrestrial in origin. across the regolith according to its mobility and ad- While these and other investigations suggest contami- sorption characteristics before eventually becoming nation from the Apollo spacecraft as a likely source for trapped. Herein we present supporting evicence for this a number of observed signatures[1,2,4,5], what is not claim. explained is the nature of the trapping mechanism for In gas chromatography (GC), components of a the N2 feature in 10086, and demonstrates gas retention sample are separated within a column according to from a gas that, under most circumstances, exhibits no their individual partitioning coefficients and by such retention at temperatures around 300 K[3].
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLORING the MOON in the 21St CENTURY
    CosmoELEMENTS EXPLORING THE MOON IN THE 21st CENTURY Samuel J. Lawrence1 and Clive R. Neal2 DOI: 10.2138/gselements.15.5.360 INTRODUCTION In 2019, we are celebrating the 50th anniversary of NASA’s momentous Apollo expedi- tions to the Moon. The samples brought back by the astronauts, and the fieldwork those astro- The South Pole of the Moon, pictured here in an oblique view from FIGURE 1 NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, is the landing site for the nauts performed on the lunar surface, cemented the Moon’s status as seventh human lunar landing. IMAGE COURTESY OF NAC M1195011983LR (NASA/ the cornerstone of the solar system. It is not an exaggeration to say GSFC/ARIZONA STATE UniVERSITY). that the Apollo expeditions transformed our understanding of our solar system, and, in fact, most of the discoveries made in planetary science since the 1960s can trace directly, or indirectly, from the scientific of the Sun’s evolution and history. Finally, this is another area where results of those Apollo expeditions. the Apollo expeditions represent a strength: there are five decades worth of planetary science hypotheses that lunar geological fieldwork Although some erroneously proclaim that the Moon is “Been there, will address. The lunar surface could also provide a unique and stable done that”, nothing could be further from the truth. After a long long-term platform for astronomy. In particular, manned radio obser- st hiatus, beginning in the first years of the 21 century, there has vatories or optical interferometers on the far side of the Moon could been a resurgence of interest in the Moon, including the Kaguya produce dramatic advances in astrophysics.
    [Show full text]