Whose Music Is It Anyway? How We Came to View Musical Expression As a Form of Property

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Whose Music Is It Anyway? How We Came to View Musical Expression As a Form of Property American University Washington College of Law Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals Scholarship & Research 2004 Whose Music is it Anyway? How We Came to View Musical Expression as a Form of Property Michael W. Carroll American University Washington College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Carroll, Michael W., "Whose Music is it Anyway? How We Came to View Musical Expression as a Form of Property" (2004). Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals. 1204. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/1204 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarship & Research at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Working Paper Series Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Year 2003 Whose Music Is It Anyway?: How We Came To View Musical Expression As A Form Of Property { Part I Michael W. Carroll Villanova University School of Law, [email protected] WHOSE MUSIC IS IT ANYWAY?: HOW WE CAME TO VIEW MUSICAL EXPRESSION AS A FORM OF PROPERTY Michael W. Carroll* I. INTRODUCTION The year 2003 marked the end of the first decade of the “digital revolution.”1 Of the many changes wrought by developments in digital * Assistant Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law. Thanks to Oren Bracha, Douglas Galbi, Jacqueline Lipton, Jessica Litman, and Michael Madison for insightful comments. I also received helpful comments on oral presentations of this Article at the Cyberlaw Retreat convened by Harvard Law School’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society and at the June 2003 Law and Society Annual Meeting. I thank the participants in both fora for their thoughts. The Villanova community has done much to support this project. For helpful and supportive comments, I thank my colleagues Michelle Anderson, Leslie Book, Ann Juliano, Greg Magarian, and Michele Pistone. For enthusiastic research assistance, I thank Christopher Nickels and Elizabeth Pulbratek; for unswerving administrative support, I thank Joan Delong; and for cheerful and efficient processing of numerous inter-library loan requests, I thank the reference librarians at the Villanova University School of Law. Finally, I gratefully acknowledge Villanova University School of Law’s financial support for this research. As ever, my family has been a source of inspiration and support, and I thank Kristy, Madeleine, and Vivian Carroll for that. 1. The technology underlying the explosive growth of the Internet certainly is far older than a decade. Digital technology dates back to the 1930s, computing technology dates back to the 1940s (unless one wants to count the abacus), and much of the research on packet-switched digital networks began in the early 1960s. See, e.g., JOHN NAUGHTON, A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE FUTURE: THE ORIGINS OF THE INTERNET 92, 118-19 (1999); see also LEONARD KLEINROCK, COMMUNICATION NETS: STOCHASTIC MESSAGE FLOW AND DELAY (1964). But 1993 approximates the time at which those outside the computing community began to get wind of the Internet and the future that it might portend. In September 1993, the Commerce Department released its “Agenda for Action” for the “National Information Infrastructure,” heralding the new technology in glowing terms. Administration Policy Statement, 58 Fed. Reg. 49,025 (Sept. 21, 1993); see also John Perry Barlow, A Declaration of Independence for Cyberspace, in CRYPTO ANARCHY, CYBERSTATES AND PIRATE UTOPIAS 27 (Peter Ludlow ed., 2001). In that same year, the first issue of Wired magazine, devoted to the brave new wired world, hit the newsstands. Since then, expansion of the physical infrastructure, supported by adoption of open technical standards, has indeed led to some substantial changes in how we communicate. Significant portions of business communication and the personal communications of the upper and middle classes in the United States are channeled across the packet-switched network as electronic mail or instant messages. See, e.g., Ariana Eunjung Cha, ‘Digital Divide’ Less Clear, As Internet Use Spreads, Policy Debated Anew, WASH. POST, June 29, 2002, at E1 (reporting on study showing that less than half of the residents of the United States with incomes between $15,000 and $25,000 have Internet access at home or at work, compared to the 90% of residents with incomes of more than $75,000). Two developments in particular threaten revolution. The first development has been the digitization of the sights and sounds (and smells?)—the texts—that make up our popular culture. See, e.g., Michael W. Carroll, Disruptive Technology and Common Law Lawmaking: A Brief Analysis of A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 9 VILL. SPORTS & ENT. L.J. 5 (2002) (describing process by which popular music has been digitized). The second has been the deployment of digital networks featuring an architecture that disperses control and power over communication largely to end users of the network. Exploiting these developments, manufacturers of so- called “peer-to-peer” software have enabled end users to form virtual private networks through which each end user’s machine is a “peer” with all other machines insofar as the machine is both a “client,” which requests data, and a “server,” which sends data. Users of these networks serve and receive digital renderings of sight and 1405 1406 UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI LAW REVIEW [Vol. 72 technology, one of the most hotly contested has been the legal and social status of music. In 2000, the stunning growth of Napster’s network, which enabled users to “share” music files across the Internet with a few million of their closest friends, brought this still-unresolved controversy to prominence.2 Ever more promiscuous transmissions of music files across the Internet have drawn an enraged response from music publishers, recording companies, and some recording artists and composers, who collectively characterize the millions of Internet users who engage in the unauthorized exchange of prerecorded music across the Internet as “thieves.” This charge has been laid in lawsuits, news reports, advertising, and at the Grammy Awards. In April 2003, representatives of the Recording Industry of America Association (RIAA) sent the following instant message to thousands of users of the Kazaa peer-to-peer network: “When you break the law, you risk legal penalties. There is a simple way to avoid that risk: DON'T STEAL MUSIC.”3 Necessarily undergirding the charge of theft is the premise that music is a form of property—an odd kind of property that can be “stolen” by unauthorized reproduction and distribution. Among the millions of Internet users exchanging music files, some agree that they are in effect engaged in looting.4 Many, however, deny the charge. Some declare that “information wants to be free” and that music, like all other forms of digitized cultural expression, no longer can be or should be treated as sound in open disregard for traditional channels through which works of popular culture have been purveyed and in open disregard of copyright law, which has underwritten the traditional arrangements for selling pop culture. The size of peer-to-peer networks continues to grow. For example, Napster’s most popular successor, the Kazaa Media Desktop, reportedly now has become the most downloaded piece of software in Internet history. See Most Downloaded Program on the Web?, available at http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/05/23/media.kazaa.reut/ (last visited Feb. 1, 2004). 2. See, e.g., A & M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001) (holding Napster liable for users’ unauthorized transmissions of music files). For a detailed look inside the business side of Napster’s meteoric rise, see JOSEPH MENN, ALL THE RAVE: THE RISE AND FALL OF SHAWN FANNING’S NAPSTER (2003). For more on the technology and specific copyright issues raised by Napster, see generally Carroll, supra note 1 (describing process by which popular music has been digitized). 3. See Amy Harmon, Music Industry Sends a Message to PC Screens: Sharing Is Theft, N.Y. TIMES, Apr. 30, 2003, at C1 (quoting instant message sent by representatives of the Recording Industry of America Association to users of the Kazaa file-sharing network). Escalating this conflict, the RIAA recently has won the right to unmask the online identities of those who transfer music files across peer-to-peer computer networks. With that information, the RIAA has commenced a campaign against individuals alleged to have engaged in large-scale unauthorized transmissions of music files. See, e.g., Amy Harmon, 261 Lawsuits Filed on Music Sharing, N.Y. TIMES, Sept. 9, 2003, at A1 (describing lawsuits as the “first broad legal action aimed at ordinary users of file-sharing networks”). 4. To further bolster support for the view that unauthorized file swapping is theft per se, the RIAA has offered amnesty to those file traders willing to publicly confess to theft. See, e.g., Andy Sullivan, Repent Downloaders and Get Amnesty, Reuters, Sept. 5, 2003, available at http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;? storyID=3396175. 2004] WHOSE MUSIC 1407 proprietary information.5 Others accept the premise that music is a form of property but deny that their activities infringe the rights of property owners. A third view looks at music as a form of shared property. On this view, creators have some rights to control the initial sale and distribution of music, but buyers also have rights to use and “share” the music they have purchased.6 This conceptual conflict over music’s status has been brought into relief by changed material circumstances.
Recommended publications
  • Playing with the Performer in Medieval Music: Machaut’S Ideas on Love and Order in Quant Vraie Amour / O Series Summe Rata / Super Omnes Speciosa (Motet 17)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Playing with the performer in Medieval music: Machaut’s ideas on love and order in Quant vraie Amour / O series summe rata / Super omnes speciosa (Motet 17) Boogaart, J. Publication date 2009 Document Version Final published version Published in Dutch Journal of Music Theory Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Boogaart, J. (2009). Playing with the performer in Medieval music: Machaut’s ideas on love and order in Quant vraie Amour / O series summe rata / Super omnes speciosa (Motet 17). Dutch Journal of Music Theory, 14(1), 32-41. http://dpc.uba.uva.nl/vol14/nr01/art05 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:24 Sep 2021 jacques boogaart Playing with the Performer in Medieval Music: Machaut’s Ideas on Love and Order in Quant vraie Amour / O series summe rata / Super omnes speciosa (Motet 17) Machaut’s seventeenth motet might be one of his earliest works.
    [Show full text]
  • The Damned Absorbing Article on Comparative Aesthetic Values in the Blind and Deaf
    diminutive study, where I was slaving, just then, at an The Damned absorbing article on Comparative Aesthetic Values in the Blind and Deaf. by Algernon Blackwood But Frances did not move. She kept her grey eyes upon Oakley Street where the evening mist from the river drew mournful perspectives into view. It was Chapter I late October. We heard the omnibuses thundering “I’m over forty, Frances, and rather set in my across the bridge. The monotony of that broad, char- ways,” I said good-naturedly, ready to yield if she acterless street seemed more than usually depressing. insisted that our going together on the visit involved Even in June sunshine it was dead, but with autumn her happiness. “My work is rather heavy just now too, its melancholy soaked into every house between as you know. The question is, could I work there— King’s Road and the Embankment. It washed thought with a lot of unassorted people in the house?” into the past, instead of inviting it hopefully towards “Mabel doesn’t mention any other people, Bill,” the future. For me, its easy width was an avenue was my sister’s rejoinder. “I gather she’s alone—as through which nameless slums across the river sent well as lonely.” creeping messages of depression, and I always By the way she looked sideways out of the win- regarded it as Winter’s main entrance into London— dow at nothing, it was obvious she was disappointed, fog, slush, gloom trooped down it every November, but to my surprise she did not urge the point; and as waving their forbidding banners till March came to I glanced at Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Re/Defining the Imaginary Museum of National Music
    Re/Defining the Imaginary Museum of National Music The Case of Croatia Zdravko Blažekovic´ The historian is a product of history himself, and of his situation. However hard we may try, he cannot escape the molding of his mind by his experience and his surroundings.1 Music historiography in Croatia was throughout the twentieth century marked by the path established in the late nineteenth century by Franjo Ksaver Kuhač (1834-1911), who defined the criteria for inclusion of musicians into the national canon on the basis of their Croatian ethnic origin rather than presenting cultural circles in which they were active. In the twentieth century, the central influence on the definition of the canon of Croatian music history came from Josip Andreis (1909-1982) in his historical survey published in three Croatian editions (Razvoj muzičke umjetnosti u Hrvatskoj [The development of musical arts in Croatia], 1962; Povijest hrvatske glazbe [History of Croatian music], 1974, 1989) and two English editions (Music in Croatia 1974, 1982). Synthesizing the existing views about Croatian music, he constructed in his narrative a museum of Croatian and foreign com- posers active in Croatia, as well as composers born in Croatia but living abroad. Besides nationalistic traits inherited from Kuhač, a reason for emphasizing activities of composers working abroad were the political and cultural circumstances surrounding Andreis during the time of communist Yugoslavia, when Croatian connections with the Central European musical space were particularly appreciated, especially when the quality of composers living abroad surpassed the musical production within the country. Being a part of multina- tional Yugoslavia situated between the Eastern and Western cultural and religious spheres, Croatians at the time wanted to distance themselves from the cultures in Eastern Europe and felt the need to be reassured about their belonging to Slavia Latina.
    [Show full text]
  • John Lennon from ‘Imagine’ to Martyrdom Paul Mccartney Wings – Band on the Run George Harrison All Things Must Pass Ringo Starr the Boogaloo Beatle
    THE YEARS 1970 -19 8 0 John Lennon From ‘Imagine’ to martyrdom Paul McCartney Wings – band on the run George Harrison All things must pass Ringo Starr The boogaloo Beatle The genuine article VOLUME 2 ISSUE 3 UK £5.99 Packed with classic interviews, reviews and photos from the archives of NME and Melody Maker www.jackdaniels.com ©2005 Jack Daniel’s. All Rights Reserved. JACK DANIEL’S and OLD NO. 7 are registered trademarks. A fine sippin’ whiskey is best enjoyed responsibly. by Billy Preston t’s hard to believe it’s been over sent word for me to come by, we got to – all I remember was we had a groove going and 40 years since I fi rst met The jamming and one thing led to another and someone said “take a solo”, then when the album Beatles in Hamburg in 1962. I ended up recording in the studio with came out my name was there on the song. Plenty I arrived to do a two-week them. The press called me the Fifth Beatle of other musicians worked with them at that time, residency at the Star Club with but I was just really happy to be there. people like Eric Clapton, but they chose to give me Little Richard. He was a hero of theirs Things were hard for them then, Brian a credit for which I’m very grateful. so they were in awe and I think they had died and there was a lot of politics I ended up signing to Apple and making were impressed with me too because and money hassles with Apple, but we a couple of albums with them and in turn had I was only 16 and holding down a job got on personality-wise and they grew to the opportunity to work on their solo albums.
    [Show full text]
  • French Secular Music in Saint-Domingue (1750-1795) Viewed As a Factor in America's Musical Growth. John G
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1971 French Secular Music in Saint-Domingue (1750-1795) Viewed as a Factor in America's Musical Growth. John G. Cale Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Cale, John G., "French Secular Music in Saint-Domingue (1750-1795) Viewed as a Factor in America's Musical Growth." (1971). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 2112. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/2112 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 72-17,750 CALE, John G., 1922- FRENCH SECULAR MUSIC IN SAINT-DOMINGUE (1750-1795) VIEWED AS A FACTOR IN AMERICA'S MUSICAL GROWTH. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College;, Ph.D., 1971 Music I University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FRENCH SECULAR MUSIC IN SAINT-DOMINGUE (1750-1795) VIEWED AS A FACTOR IN AMERICA'S MUSICAL GROWTH A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Music by John G. Cale B.M., Louisiana State University, 1943 M.A., University of Michigan, 1949 December, 1971 PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print.
    [Show full text]
  • 02 Chapter 1 Stoessel
    Prologue La harpe de melodie faite saunz mirancholie par plaisir doit bien cescun resjorr pour l'armonie orr, sonner et vei'r. J With the prior verses begins one of the most fascinating musical works in the ars subtilior style, composed by the master musician Jacob de Senleches. This composer, as his name suggests, was a native of northern France whose scant biographical details indicate he was a valued musician at courts in the south at Castile, Navarre and possibly Avignon.2 La harpe de melodie typifies several aspects of the present study. Firstly, its presence in a n1anuscripe copied in the city of Pavia in Lombardy indicates the cultivation of ostensibly French music in the ars subtilior style in northern Italy. Secondly, its musical notation contains novel, experimental notational devices and note shapes that parallel intellectual developments in other fields of culture in this period. I "The melodious harp made without melancholy to please, well may each person rejoice to hear, sing and hear its harmony." (All translations are mine, unless otherwise specified.) 2 The conclusion that Jacob de Senleches was a native of northern France is made on the premise that Senleches is the near-homophone of Senlecques, a village just south of Calais in the County of Artois. The only surviving archival evidence concerning Jacob de Senleches consists of a dispensation made at the Court of Navarre by Charles II of Navarre on 21 sl August, 1383 which speCifies: ... 100 libras a Jacomill de Sen/aches, juglar de harpe, para regresar a donde se encontraba el cardenal de Aragon, su maestro (" 100 libras for Jacob de Senleches, player of the harp, to return to where he was to meet the Cardinal of Aragon, his master."), Jlid.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inner Light: the Beatles, India, Gurus, and the Legacy
    The Inner Light: The Beatles, India, Gurus, and the Legacy John Covach Institute for Popular Music, University of Rochester Arthur Satz Department of Music Eastman School of Music Main Points The Beatles’ “road to India” is mostly navigated by George Harrison John Lennon was also enthusiastic, Paul somewhat, Ringo not so much Harrison’s “road to India” can be divided into two kinds of influence: Musical influences—the actual sounds and structures of Indian music Philosophical and spiritual influences—elements that influence lyrics and lifestyle The musical influences begin in April 1965, become focused in fall 1966, and extend to mid 1968 The philosophical influences begin in late 1966 and continue through the rest of Harrison’s life Note: Harrison began using LSD in the spring of 1965 and discontinued in August 1967 Songs by other Beatles, Lennon especially, also reflect Indian influences The Three “Indian” songs of George Harrison “Love You To” recorded April 1966, released on Revolver, August 1966 “Within You Without You” recorded March, April 1967, released on Sgt Pepper, June 1967 “The Inner Light” recorded January, February 1968, released as b-side to “Lady Madonna,” March 1968 Three Aspects of “Indian” characteristics Use of some aspect of Indian philosophy or spirituality in the lyrics Use of Indian musical instruments Use of Indian musical features (rhythmic patterns, drone, texture, melodic elements) Musical Influences Ravi Shankar is principal influence on Harrison, though he does not enter the picture until mid 1966 April 1965: Beatles film restaurant scene for Help! Harrison falls in love with the sitar, buys one cheap Summer 1965: Beatles in LA hear about Shankar from McGuinn, Crosby (meet Elvis, discuss Yogananda) October 1965: “Norwegian Wood” recorded, released in December on Rubber Soul.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of the Relationship Between Mathematics and Music
    An Exploration of the Relationship between Mathematics and Music Shah, Saloni 2010 MIMS EPrint: 2010.103 Manchester Institute for Mathematical Sciences School of Mathematics The University of Manchester Reports available from: http://eprints.maths.manchester.ac.uk/ And by contacting: The MIMS Secretary School of Mathematics The University of Manchester Manchester, M13 9PL, UK ISSN 1749-9097 An Exploration of ! Relation"ip Between Ma#ematics and Music MATH30000, 3rd Year Project Saloni Shah, ID 7177223 University of Manchester May 2010 Project Supervisor: Professor Roger Plymen ! 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface! 3 1.0 Music and Mathematics: An Introduction to their Relationship! 6 2.0 Historical Connections Between Mathematics and Music! 9 2.1 Music Theorists and Mathematicians: Are they one in the same?! 9 2.2 Why are mathematicians so fascinated by music theory?! 15 3.0 The Mathematics of Music! 19 3.1 Pythagoras and the Theory of Music Intervals! 19 3.2 The Move Away From Pythagorean Scales! 29 3.3 Rameau Adds to the Discovery of Pythagoras! 32 3.4 Music and Fibonacci! 36 3.5 Circle of Fifths! 42 4.0 Messiaen: The Mathematics of his Musical Language! 45 4.1 Modes of Limited Transposition! 51 4.2 Non-retrogradable Rhythms! 58 5.0 Religious Symbolism and Mathematics in Music! 64 5.1 Numbers are God"s Tools! 65 5.2 Religious Symbolism and Numbers in Bach"s Music! 67 5.3 Messiaen"s Use of Mathematical Ideas to Convey Religious Ones! 73 6.0 Musical Mathematics: The Artistic Aspect of Mathematics! 76 6.1 Mathematics as Art! 78 6.2 Mathematical Periods! 81 6.3 Mathematics Periods vs.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Read Music Notation in JUST 30 MINUTES! C D E F G a B C D E F G a B C D E F G a B C D E F G a B C D E F G a B C D E
    The New School of American Music How to Read Music Notation IN JUST 30 MINUTES! C D E F G A B C D E F G A B C D E F G A B C D E F G A B C D E F G A B C D E 1. MELODIES 2. THE PIANO KEYBOARD The first thing to learn about reading music A typical piano has 88 keys total (including all is that you can ignore most of the informa- white keys and black keys). Most electronic tion that’s written on the page. The only part keyboards and organ manuals have fewer. you really need to learn is called the “treble However, there are only twelve different clef.” This is the symbol for treble clef: notes—seven white and five black—on the keyboard. This twelve note pattern repeats several times up and down the piano keyboard. In our culture the white notes are named after the first seven letters of the alphabet: & A B C D E F G The bass clef You can learn to recognize all the notes by is for classical sight by looking at their patterns relative to the pianists only. It is totally useless for our black keys. Notice the black keys are arranged purposes. At least for now. ? in patterns of two and three. The piano universe tends to revolve around the C note which you The notes ( ) placed within the treble clef can identify as the white key found just to the represent the melody of the song.
    [Show full text]
  • Keyboard Playing and the Mechanization of Polyphony in Italian Music, Circa 1600
    Keyboard Playing and the Mechanization of Polyphony in Italian Music, Circa 1600 By Leon Chisholm A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Music in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Kate van Orden, Co-Chair Professor James Q. Davies, Co-Chair Professor Mary Ann Smart Professor Massimo Mazzotti Summer 2015 Keyboard Playing and the Mechanization of Polyphony in Italian Music, Circa 1600 Copyright 2015 by Leon Chisholm Abstract Keyboard Playing and the Mechanization of Polyphony in Italian Music, Circa 1600 by Leon Chisholm Doctor of Philosophy in Music University of California, Berkeley Professor Kate van Orden, Co-Chair Professor James Q. Davies, Co-Chair Keyboard instruments are ubiquitous in the history of European music. Despite the centrality of keyboards to everyday music making, their influence over the ways in which musicians have conceptualized music and, consequently, the music that they have created has received little attention. This dissertation explores how keyboard playing fits into revolutionary developments in music around 1600 – a period which roughly coincided with the emergence of the keyboard as the multipurpose instrument that has served musicians ever since. During the sixteenth century, keyboard playing became an increasingly common mode of experiencing polyphonic music, challenging the longstanding status of ensemble singing as the paradigmatic vehicle for the art of counterpoint – and ultimately replacing it in the eighteenth century. The competing paradigms differed radically: whereas ensemble singing comprised a group of musicians using their bodies as instruments, keyboard playing involved a lone musician operating a machine with her hands.
    [Show full text]
  • Trent 91; First Steps Towards a Stylistic Classification (Revised 2019 Version of My 2003 Paper, Originally Circulated to Just a Dozen Specialists)
    Trent 91; first steps towards a stylistic classification (revised 2019 version of my 2003 paper, originally circulated to just a dozen specialists). Probably unreadable in a single sitting but useful as a reference guide, the original has been modified in some wording, by mention of three new-ish concordances and by correction of quite a few errors. There is also now a Trent 91 edition index on pp. 69-72. [Type the company name] Musical examples have been imported from the older version. These have been left as they are apart from the Appendix I and II examples, which have been corrected. [Type the document Additional information (and also errata) found since publication date: 1. The Pange lingua setting no. 1330 (cited on p. 29) has a concordance in Wr2016 f. 108r, whereti it is tle]textless. (This manuscript is sometimes referred to by its new shelf number Warsaw 5892). The concordance - I believe – was first noted by Tom Ward (see The Polyphonic Office Hymn[T 1y4p0e0 t-h15e2 d0o, cpu. m21e6n,t se suttbtinigt lneo] . 466). 2. Page 43 footnote 77: the fragmentary concordance for the Urbs beata setting no. 1343 in the Weitra fragment has now been described and illustrated fully in Zapke, S. & Wright, P. ‘The Weitra Fragment: A Central Source of Late Medieval Polyphony’ in Music & Letters 96 no. 3 (2015), pp. 232-343. 3. The Introit group subgroup ‘I’ discussed on p. 34 and the Sequences discussed on pp. 7-12 were originally published in the Ex Codicis pilot booklet of 2003, and this has now been replaced with nos 148-159 of the Trent 91 edition.
    [Show full text]
  • FRENCH SYMPHONIES from the Nineteenth Century to the Present
    FRENCH SYMPHONIES From the Nineteenth Century To The Present A Discography Of CDs And LPs Prepared by Michael Herman NICOLAS BACRI (b. 1961) Born in Paris. He began piano lessons at the age of seven and continued with the study of harmony, counterpoint, analysis and composition as a teenager with Françoise Gangloff-Levéchin, Christian Manen and Louis Saguer. He then entered the Paris Conservatory where he studied with a number of composers including Claude Ballif, Marius Constant, Serge Nigg, and Michel Philippot. He attended the French Academy in Rome and after returning to Paris, he worked as head of chamber music for Radio France. He has since concentrated on composing. He has composed orchestral, chamber, instrumental, vocal and choral works. His unrecorded Symphonies are: Nos. 1, Op. 11 (1983-4), 2, Op. 22 (1986-8), 3, Op. 33 "Sinfonia da Requiem" (1988-94) and 5 , Op. 55 "Concerto for Orchestra" (1996-7).There is also a Sinfonietta for String Orchestra, Op. 72 (2001) and a Sinfonia Concertante for Orchestra, Op. 83a (1995-96/rév.2006) . Symphony No. 4, Op. 49 "Symphonie Classique - Sturm und Drang" (1995-6) Jean-Jacques Kantorow/Tapiola Sinfonietta ( + Flute Concerto, Concerto Amoroso, Concerto Nostalgico and Nocturne for Cello and Strings) BIS CD-1579 (2009) Symphony No. 6, Op. 60 (1998) Leonard Slatkin/Orchestre National de France ( + Henderson: Einstein's Violin, El Khoury: Les Fleuves Engloutis, Maskats: Tango, Plate: You Must Finish Your Journey Alone, and Theofanidis: Rainbow Body) GRAMOPHONE MASTE (2003) (issued by Gramophone Magazine) CLAUDE BALLIF (1924-2004) Born in Paris. His musical training began at the Bordeaux Conservatory but he went on to the Paris Conservatory where he was taught by Tony Aubin, Noël Gallon and Olivier Messiaen.
    [Show full text]