Arge Platform of the Green River Basin David

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arge Platform of the Green River Basin David -PALEOCENE DEPOSITION OF THE ljOBACK- fORMATION- ON THE !:A- -(?ARGE PLATFORM OF THE GREEN--- RIVER- BASIN BY DAVID EDWARD )JCHMUDE Bachelor of Science Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1989 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 1991 tJ\-&~ \C\Cl\ ~~5l~~ btt PALEOCENE DEPOSITION OF THE HOBACK FORMATION ON THE LA BARGE PLATFORM OF THE GREEN RIVER BASIN Thesis Approved: -------------------------+---------a~ w, ~ :n= Thesis Adviser -------~J~~-t7~~-----Dean of the Graduate College I I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Cleaves for his help throughout my graduate program and Dr. AI-Shaieb for his input on the diagenetic aspects of the Hoback Formation I would also like to thank Dr. Stewart, Ed Burritt, and Dwaine Edington for their help in reviewing the text, and Special thanks to Jim Kreutzfeld, who suggested the topic. Most importantly I would like to thank Texaco for their complete financial support Without their involvement the study would not have been possible. would also like to extend special thanks to Shelly Stone for drafting all of my maps. I extend my deepest appreciation to my father , who typed and reviewed the manuscript for me, and to both of my parents, for their support and encouragement throughout my educational career. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................... 1 Location of Study Area..................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope of the Study.................................................... 1 Methods of Investigation................................................................... 6 Subsurface studies................................................................ 6 Field Studies........................................................................... 1 0 Previous Investigations..................................................................... 1 0 Stratigraphy........................................................................ 1 0 Paleocene Production .......................................................... 1 2 Structural Geology................................................................. 1 3 II. STRUCTURAL FEATURES........................................................................ 14 Tectonic Setting ...................................................................... 1 4 Gras Ventre Mountains......................................................... 1 4 Wind River Mountains........................................................... 1 6 Rock Springs Uplift................................................................ 16 Uinta Mountains..................................................................... 17 Overthrust Belt .................................. ........ ......... ........ .... .. ...... 1 7 Influential Structural Elements........................................................ 20 Moxa Arch (La Barge Platform)........................................... 20 Darby (Hogsback) Thrust..................................................... 21 Hilliard (La Barge) Thrust..................................................... 23 Other Faulting......................................................................... 26 Timing of Important Structural Events............................................ 28 Ill. STRATIGRAPHY........................................................................................... 32 Backgound.......................................................................................... 32 Late Cretaceous................................................................................. 33 Frontier Formation................................................................. 34 Hilliard Formation .................................................................. 39 Mesaverde formation ............................................................ 41 Tertiary................................................................................................. 44 Stratigriphic Nomenclature.................................................. 44 Hoback Formation................................................................. 49 Wasatch Formation................................................................ 51 Lookout Mountain Conglomerate Member iv Chapter Page of the Wasatch Formation............................................... 52 Chappo Member of the Wasatch Formation..................... 54 IV. CORE AND FIELD STUDIES..................................................................... 55 Core Descriptions.............................................................................. 55 Palynology of the Hoback Formation............................................. 56 Field Investigations............................................................................ 56 V. SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY BASED ON ELECTRIC LOG STUDIES.. 64 Introduction......................................................................................... 64 Cross-Sections................................................................................... 64 Stratigraphic........................................................................... 64 Structural................................................................................. 65 Structure Maps................................................................................... 65 Base Of Hoback Sand .. ..... .. .......... .. .... .. .... ... .............. .. .. .. .. .. 6 5 Top of TH-3 Interval ("X" Marker) Map............................... 66 Hilliard Fault Plane Map....................................................... 66 Net Sand Iso lith Maps....................................................................... 6 6 TH-1 Interval Net Sand Map................................................ 67 TH-2 Interval Net Sand Map................................................ 67 TH-3 Interval Net Sand Map................................................ 67 TH-4 Interval Net Sand Map................................................ 68 TH-5 Interval Net Sand Map................................................ 68 Interval Isopach Maps....................................................................... 69 TH-2 Interval Isopach Map................................................... 69 TH-3 Interval Isopach Map................................................... 69 TH-4 Interval Isopach Map................................................... 69 VI. DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE HOBACK FORMATION.... 71 Environmental Interpretation........................................................... 71 Bedforms of Sand Dominated Braided Rivers............................. 76 Bars.......................................................................................... 80 Longitudinal Bars....................................................... 81 Lingoidal (Transverse) Bars.................................... 82 Compound Bars......................................................... 83 Sand Waves........................................................................... 83 Dunes....................................................................................... 84 Classification of the Hoback Braided River Deposits.................. 85 Source Area........................................................................................ 86 Paleocene Paleoenvironment......................................................... 89 VII. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY............................................................................ 94 Introduction......................................................................................... 94 v Chapter Page Possible Source And Migration Path............................................. 96 Source..................................................................................... 96 Migration Path........................................................................ 99 Trapping Mechanisms...................................................................... 1 00 Structural Traps ...................................................................... 1 00 Stratigraphic Traps ................................................................ 1 01 Cumulative Production Map ............................................................ 101 Possible Reservoir Communication Problems............................. 1 02 VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS............................................................ 1 04 REFERENCES CITED.............................................................................................. 1 06 APPENDICES .......................................................................................................... 113 APPENDIX A- CORE DISCRIPTIONS ..................................................... 114 WELL M327 ........................................................................................ 116 WELL Tl-4.. .................... .... .................. ............................... ..... .. ........ .. 1 22 WELL K634W ..................................................................................... 1 28 WELL J503Y .. .......... .............. .......... .. ................ .. ............... ................ 1 34 APPENDIX B- WELL LOG DATA.............................................................. 141 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page I. Stratigraphic Names Assigned to the Paleocene Producing Sands of La Barge
Recommended publications
  • The Geologic History of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin
    The Geologic History of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin FOSSIL BUTTE The Geologic History of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin NPS Occasional Paper No. 3 THE GEOLOGIC HISTORY OF FOSSIL BUTTE NATIONAL MONUMENT AND FOSSIL BASIN Paul O. McGrew Michael Casilliano Department of Geology, University of Wyoming National Park Service Occasional Paper Number Three 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS index.htm Last Updated: 01-Mar-2005 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/fobu/index.htm[6/17/2013 12:42:49 PM] The Geologic History of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin (Tables of Contents) FOSSIL BUTTE The Geologic History of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin NPS Occasional Paper No. 3 CONTENTS COVER INTRODUCTION LOCATION HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF RESEARCH STRATIGRAPHY Thaynes Limestone Evanston Formation Wasatch Formation Basal Conglomerate Member Lower Member Main Body Sandstone Tongue Mudstone Tongue Bullpen Member Tunp Member Age of the Wasatch Formation Depositional Environment Green River Formation Fossil Butte Member Angelo Member Age of the Green River Formation Depositional Environment Fowkes Formation Sillem Member Bulldog Hollow Member Gooseberry Member Age of the Fowkes Formation Depositional Environment QUATERNARY THE GEOLOGIC STRUCTURE OF FOSSIL BASIN PALEONTOLOGY Flora Invertebrates http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/fobu/contents.htm[6/17/2013 12:42:58 PM] The Geologic History of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin (Tables of Contents) Vertebrates Fish Amphibians Reptiles Birds Mammals PALEOECOLOGY AND TAPHONOMY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS GLOSSARY REFERENCES BIBLIOGRAPHY Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data McGrew, Paul Orman, 1909- The geological history of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cretaceous System in Central Sierra County, New Mexico
    The Cretaceous System in central Sierra County, New Mexico Spencer G. Lucas, New Mexico Museum of Natural History, Albuquerque, NM 87104, [email protected] W. John Nelson, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, IL 61820, [email protected] Karl Krainer, Institute of Geology, Innsbruck University, Innsbruck, A-6020 Austria, [email protected] Scott D. Elrick, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, IL 61820, [email protected] Abstract (part of the Dakota Formation, Campana (Fig. 1). This is the most extensive outcrop Member of the Tres Hermanos Formation, area of Cretaceous rocks in southern New Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rocks are Flying Eagle Canyon Formation, Ash Canyon Mexico, and the exposed Cretaceous sec- Formation, and the entire McRae Group). A exposed in central Sierra County, southern tion is very thick, at about 2.5 km. First comprehensive understanding of the Cretaceous New Mexico, in the Fra Cristobal Mountains, recognized in 1860, these Cretaceous Caballo Mountains and in the topographically strata in Sierra County allows a more detailed inter- pretation of local geologic events in the context strata have been the subject of diverse, but low Cutter sag between the two ranges. The ~2.5 generally restricted, studies for more than km thick Cretaceous section is assigned to the of broad, transgressive-regressive (T-R) cycles of 150 years. (ascending order) Dakota Formation (locally deposition in the Western Interior Seaway, and includes the Oak Canyon [?] and Paguate also in terms of Laramide orogenic
    [Show full text]
  • Uppermost Cretaceous and Tertiary Stratigraphy of Fossil Basin, Southwestern Wyoming
    Uppermost Cretaceous and Tertiary Stratigraphy of Fossil Basin, Southwestern Wyoming By STEVEN S. ORIEL and JOSHUA I. TRACEY, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 635 New subdivisions of the J,ooo-Joot-thick continental Evanston, Wasatch, Green River, and Fowkes Formations facilitate understanding of sediment genesis and Jl7yoming thrust-belt tectonic events UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 70-604646 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 65 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Wasatch Formation-Continued Abstract __________________________________________ _ 1 Fossils and age-Continued· Page Introduction ______________________________________ _ 2 Tunp Member______________________________ 28 Purpose ______________________________________ _ 2 Origin--------~-------------------------------- 28 Earlier work_ .. __ - __ - ___________________ - _-- _- __ 2 Tectonic implications ____________ -_-------------- 29 Acknowledgments __ . ___________________________ _ 2 Green River Formation ___ .. _______ ------------------ 30 General relations ___ -- _________________________ _ 5 Name and usage __________________ -------------- 30 Evanston Formation _______________________________ _ 5 Definition __________________ -_-------------- 30 N arne and usage _______________________________ _ 5 Lithologic heterogeneity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Stratigraphy at Durango, Colorado
    160 New Mexico Geological Society, 56th Field Conference Guidebook, Geology of the Chama Basin, 2005, p. 160-169. LUCAS AND HECKERT MESOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY AT DURANGO, COLORADO SPENCER G. LUCAS AND ANDREW B. HECKERT New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 1801 Mountain Rd. NW, Albuquerque, NM 87104 ABSTRACT.—A nearly 3-km-thick section of Mesozoic sedimentary rocks is exposed at Durango, Colorado. This section con- sists of Upper Triassic, Middle-Upper Jurassic and Cretaceous strata that well record the geological history of southwestern Colorado during much of the Mesozoic. At Durango, Upper Triassic strata of the Chinle Group are ~ 300 m of red beds deposited in mostly fluvial paleoenvironments. Overlying Middle-Upper Jurassic strata of the San Rafael Group are ~ 300 m thick and consist of eolian sandstone, salina limestone and siltstone/sandstone deposited on an arid coastal plain. The Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation is ~ 187 m thick and consists of sandstone and mudstone deposited in fluvial environments. The only Lower Cretaceous strata at Durango are fluvial sandstone and conglomerate of the Burro Canyon Formation. Most of the overlying Upper Cretaceous section (Dakota, Mancos, Mesaverde, Lewis, Fruitland and Kirtland units) represents deposition in and along the western margin of the Western Interior seaway during Cenomanian-Campanian time. Volcaniclastic strata of the overlying McDermott Formation are the youngest Mesozoic strata at Durango. INTRODUCTION Durango, Colorado, sits in the Animas River Valley on the northern flank of the San Juan Basin and in the southern foothills of the San Juan and La Plata Mountains. Beginning at the northern end of the city, and extending to the southern end of town (from north of Animas City Mountain to just south of Smelter Moun- tain), the Animas River cuts in an essentially downdip direction through a homoclinal Mesozoic section of sedimentary rocks about 3 km thick (Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Plays Ute Moutnain Ute Reservation, Colorado and New Mexico
    Ute Mountain Ute Indian Reservation Cortez R18W Karle Key Xu R17W T General Setting Mine Xu Xcu 36 Can y on N Xcu McElmo WIND RIVER 32 INDIAN MABEL The Ute Mountain Ute Reservation is located in the northwest RESERVATION MOUNTAIN FT HALL IND RES Little Moude Mine Xcu T N ern portion of New Mexico and the southwestern corner of Colorado UTE PEAK 35 N R16W (Fig. UM-1). The reservation consists of 553,008 acres in Montezu BLACK 666 T W Y O M I N G MOUNTAIN 35 R20W SLEEPING UTE MOUNTAIN N ma and La Plata Counties, Colorado, and San Juan County, New R19W Coche T Mexico. All of these lands belong to the tribe but are held in trust by NORTHWESTERN 34 SHOSHONI HERMANO the U.S. Government. Individually owned lands, or allotments, are IND RES Desert Canyon PEAK N MESA VERDE R14W NATIONAL GREAT SALT LAKE W Marble SENTINEL located at Allen Canyon and White Mesa, San Juan County, Utah, Wash Towaoc PARK PEAK T and cover 8,499 acres. Tribal lands held in trust within this area cov Towaoc River M E S A 33 1/2 N er 3,597 acres. An additional forty acres are defined as U.S. Govern THE MOUND R15W SKULL VALLEY ment lands in San Juan County, Utah, and are utilized for school pur TEXAS PACIFIC 6-INCH OIL PIPELINE IND RES UNITAH AND OURAY INDIAN RESERVATION Navajo poses. W Ramona GOSHUTE 789 The Allen Canyon allotments are located twelve miles west of IND RES T UTAH 33 Blanding, Utah, and adjacent to the Manti-La Sal National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Clastic Laramide Sediments of the Wasatch Hinterland
    CLASTIC LARAMIDE SEDIMENTS OF THE WASATCH HINTERLAND, NORTHEASTERN UTAH by Daven Craig Mann A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of o • • Master of Science in Geology Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Utah Summer 1974 UNIVERSITY OF UTAH GRADUATE SCHOOL SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Daven Craig Mann I have read this thesis and have found it to be of satisfactory quality for a master's degree. * /• % Li, /Eugene Call4.ghan [ChairmartySupervisory Committee T have read this thesis and have found it to be of satisfactory quality for a master's j degree. Date rancis W. Christiansen Member, Svipervisory Committee T have read this thesis and have found it to be of satisfactory quality for a master's decree. Jonathan H. Goodwin [ember, Supervisory Committee UNIVERSITY OF UTAH LIBRARIES UNIVERSITY OF UTAH GRADUATE SCHOOL. FINAL READING APPROVAL To the Graduate Council of the University of Utah: I have read the thesis of Daven Craig Mann in its final form and have found that (1) its format, citations, and bibliographic style are consistent and acceptable; (2) its illustrative materials including figures, tables, and charts are in place; and (3) the final manuscript is satisfactory to the Supervisory Committee and is ready - for submission to the Graduate School. Approved for the Major Department Chairman/Dean Approved for the Graduate Counci Sterling M. McMurrin Dean of the Graduate School ACKNOWLEDGMENT Acknowledgment is made to the Utah Geological and Mineral Survey which financially aided the author while doing the field work.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhumation of the North American Cordillera Revealed by Multi-Dating of Upper Jurassic–Upper Cretaceous Foreland Basin Deposits
    Exhumation of the North American Cordillera revealed by multi-dating of Upper Jurassic–Upper Cretaceous foreland basin deposits Clayton S. Painter†, Barbara Carrapa, Peter G. DeCelles, George E. Gehrels, and Stuart N. Thomson Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA ABSTRACT AFT and U-Pb) shows that volcanic contami- eroded and later obscured by Basin and Range nation is a signifi cant issue that can, however, extensional tectonics, leaving only the foreland New low-temperature thermochronol- be addressed by double dating. basin deposits as a record of exhumation history. ogy and geochronology data from Upper Despite the great potential of such an approach Jurassic–Upper Cretaceous strata from the INTRODUCTION in North America, to date, no detailed detrital North American Cordilleran foreland ba- thermochronological study had been applied in sin in Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, and South Foreland basin deposits are an impor- the retro arc foreland basin of the North Ameri- Dakota document rapid exhumation rates tant archive of orogenic growth and tectonic can Cordillera. The goal of this study is to deter- of the adjacent Cordilleran orogenic belt to processes (Aubouin, 1965; Dickinson, 1974; mine the timing, pattern, and rates of cooling of the west. Both zircon (U-Th-[Sm])/He (zircon Dickinson and Suczek, 1979; Jordan, 1981; the North American Cordillera in order to better He) and apatite fi ssion track (AFT) thermo- DeCelles and Giles, 1996; DeCelles, 2004; understand the modes of exhumation and con- chronology were applied to proximal and Miall, 2009). Many researchers have used tribute to models of fold- thrust belt and foreland distal synorogenic deposits in order to iden- coarse-grained foreland basin deposits to date basin evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Assessment of Oil and Gas Resource Development of the Mancos Shale in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico
    HYDROLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF OIL AND GAS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MANCOS SHALE IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO Open-file Report 566 By Shari Kelley, Thomas Engler, Martha Cather, Cathryn Pokorny, Cheng-Heng Yang, Ethan Mamer, Gretchen Hoffman, Joe Wilch, Peggy Johnson, and Kate Zeigler New Mexico Bureau Geology & Mineral Resources New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology Socorro, New Mexico 87801 November 2014 HYDROLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF OIL AND GAS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MANCOS SHALE IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO Prepared for the Farmington Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management Shari A. Kelley, New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, [email protected] Thomas W. Engler, Petroleum and Chemical Engineering Department, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Martha Cather, Petroleum Recovery Research Center, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Cathryn Pokorny, Cheng-Heng Yang, Ethan Mamer, Gretchen Hoffman, Joe Wilch, and Peggy Johnson, New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Kate Zeigler, Zeigler Geologic Consulting, Albuquerque, NM 87123 1 Table of Contents ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CORRELATION of the UPPER CRETACEOUS STRATA of WYOMING Stratigraphic Chart Director and State Geologist Upper Cretaceous Laramie, Wyoming by Ranie M
    WYOMING STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report 2017-3 Thomas A. Drean CORRELATION OF THE UPPER CRETACEOUS STRATA OF WYOMING Stratigraphic Chart Director and State Geologist Upper Cretaceous Laramie, Wyoming by Ranie M. Lynds and Joshua S. Slattery Wyoming Interpreting the past, providing for the future 2017 Western Hanna Laramie Bighorn Denver Greater Green River Basin Wind River Basin Powder River Basin Wyoming Basin Basin Basin Basin A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Age Period Epoch Stage and Stage Polarity U.S. Western Interior U.S. Western Interior U.S. Western Interior North American U.S. Western Interior Southern Jackson Northwestern Southern Eastern Eastern Atlantic Rocky Point Separation Lost Soldier Tully Rawlins Hanna Laramie Western Southern and Eastern Bighorn Northwestern Salt Creek Southwestern Southeastern Central Northwestern Denver (Ma) Boundary Chron Radiometric Ammonite Inoceramid Land Vertebrate Palynostratigraphic Thrust Belt Hole and Rock Springs Rock Springs Rock Springs Washakie Rim Rim Ranch Draw Basin Basin, Wind River Central Wind Wind River Basin Powder Powder Powder River Black Hills Black Hills Basin (Ma) Age (Ma) Biozone Biozone Age Biozone Hoback Basin Uplift Uplift Uplift Basin Rock River Basin River Basin Basin River Basin River Basin Basin (7, 56, 77) (7, 56, 74) (8, 49, 54, 55, 56, 69, 72) (7, 23, 25, 56, 74) (7, 56, 74) (2, 33, 35, 77) (50) (6, 10, 29, 30, 47, 53, (6, 11, 12, 22, 32, 37, (12, 26, 30, 64, 72, (12, 26, 30, 36, 63, 64, (12, 19, 20, 26, 29, 30, (1, 12, 21, 30, 36, 58,
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous and Tertiary Rocks of the Eastern San Juan Basin, New Mexico and Colorado J
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/25 Cretaceous and Tertiary rocks of the eastern San Juan Basin, New Mexico and Colorado J. E. Fassett, 1974, pp. 225-230 in: Ghost Ranch, Siemers, C. T.; Woodward, L. A.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 25th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 404 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1974 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Formation, 411 379 Bear River Formation, 163 Abo Formation, 281, 282, 286, 302 seismicity, 22 Bear Springs Formation, 315 Absaroka Mountains, 111 Appalachian Orogen, 5, 9, 13, 28 Bearpaw cyclothem, 80 Absaroka sequence, 37, 44, 50, 186, Appalachian Plateau, 9, 427 Bearpaw Mountains, 111 191,233,251, 275, 377, 378, Appalachian Province, 28 Beartooth Mountains, 201, 203 383, 409 Appalachian Ridge, 427 Beartooth shelf, 92, 94 Absaroka thrust fault, 158, 159 Appalachian Shelf, 32 Beartooth uplift, 92, 110, 114 Acadian orogen, 403, 452 Appalachian Trough, 460 Beaver Creek thrust fault, 157 Adaville Formation, 164 Appalachian Valley, 427 Beaver Island, 366 Adirondack Mountains, 6, 433 Araby Formation, 435 Beaverhead Group, 101, 104 Admire Group, 325 Arapahoe Formation, 189 Bedford Shale, 376 Agate Creek fault, 123, 182 Arapien Shale, 71, 73, 74 Beekmantown Group, 440, 445 Alabama, 36, 427,471 Arbuckle anticline, 327, 329, 331 Belden Shale, 57, 123, 127 Alacran Mountain Formation, 283 Arbuckle Group, 186, 269 Bell Canyon Formation, 287 Alamosa Formation, 169, 170 Arbuckle Mountains, 309, 310, 312, Bell Creek oil field, Montana, 81 Alaska Bench Limestone, 93 328 Bell Ranch Formation, 72, 73 Alberta shelf, 92, 94 Arbuckle Uplift, 11, 37, 318, 324 Bell Shale, 375 Albion-Scioio oil field, Michigan, Archean rocks, 5, 49, 225 Belle Fourche River, 207 373 Archeolithoporella, 283 Belt Island complex, 97, 98 Albuquerque Basin, 111, 165, 167, Ardmore Basin, 11, 37, 307, 308, Belt Supergroup, 28, 53 168, 169 309, 317, 318, 326, 347 Bend Arch, 262, 275, 277, 290, 346, Algonquin Arch, 361 Arikaree Formation, 165, 190 347 Alibates Bed, 326 Arizona, 19, 43, 44, S3, 67.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Rocks and the Tertiary Ojo Alamo Sandstone, Navajo and Hopi Indian Reservations, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah
    Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Rocks and the Tertiary Ojo Alamo Sandstone, Navajo and Hopi Indian Reservations, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 521-E Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of .Indian -L1Jfairs and the Navajo Tribe ;. ~:0 ..J :i.ui._lll{c,/1 II- Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous > Rocks and the Tertiary Ojo I Alamo Sandstone, Navajo and .. .... Hopi Indian Reservations, .. Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah By R. B. O'SULLIVAN, C. A. REPENNING, E. C. BEAUMONT, and H. G. PAGE HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN RESERVATIONS, ARIZONA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 521-E Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Navajo Tribe .I .. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 ~· ·. UN.ITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 76-180659 ·~ For sale by the Sup~rintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1184 CONTENTS Page Page Abst1·act ------------------------------------------ El Upper Cretaceous rocks-Continued Introduction -------------------------------------­ 2 Mesaverde Group-Continued Location and land-net system ------------------ 2 Lower part of the Mesaverde Group in San Present work -------------------------------­ 3 Juan Basin-Continued Previous investigations and nomenclature ------ 5 Crevasse Canyon Formation ---------- E31 Lower
    [Show full text]