DOCSLIB.ORG

The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

199 by K.M. Cohen1, S.C. Finney 2, P.L. Gibbard 3, and J.-X. Fan 4 The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart 1 Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Long Beach CA, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Cambridge Quaternary, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 4 State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology & Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology & Palaeontology, CAS, Nanjing, PR China. E-mail:[email protected] The International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) (IUGS) uses the units and formally defined boundaries as international has a long tradition of producing international charts standards: they are included in the library of GeoSciML, an application for globally accessing standards-based geoscience data and that communicate higher-order divisions of geological information. Furthermore, the GSSPs (Global Boundary Stratotype time and actual knowledge on the absolute numerical Section and Point) that define the boundaries are recognized as ages of their boundaries. The primary objective of ICS international geostandards, at which ICS encourages the placement is to define precisely a global standard set of time- of markers, educational exhibits, and even ‘golden spikes’ in well- correlative units (Systems, Series, and Stages) for attended dedication ceremonies (Schmitz et al., 2011: their Fig. 4; Morton, 2012). Here we present the most recently updated version stratigraphic successions worldwide. These units are, in of the ICS Chart dated January 2013 (Fig. 1). turn, the basis for the Periods, Epochs and Ages of the From earlier editions, we have continued the organisation of the Geological Time Scale. Setting an international global chart in four columns. Three columns present the Phanerozoic, standard is fundamental for expressing geological showing four systems in each column. At the lowest level they display 34 + 34 + 32 stages. The stage names are derived from stratotype knowledge. It is also of considerable pragmatic areas, and the stages are defined primarily on marine faces. The fourth importance as it provides the framework through which column shows the Precambrian, sub-divided to system level. An regional-scale higher-resolution divisions can be linked, innovation to the layout is that the stages of greater temporal duration equated and collated. This is a status update on the are shown with thicker intervals in the columns. The numerical ages International Chronostratigraphic Chart and the ICS make clear that the chronostratigraphic units are not of equal temporal duration and that the geological time scale is not a linear one. The website www.stratigraphy.org. three Phanerozoic columns span 145, 214 and 182 Ma respectively, but have equal heights in the chart. Within these columns, each stage Introduction is given a fixed proportion of the column height (e.g., 2%). The remaining height (100–(34 x 2) = 32% in the example) is then At the 34th International Geological Congress, in 2012 in Brisbane, distributed proportionally to the stages that cover more than the fixed over 6000 delegates found the redesigned International proportion on a linear timescale for that column. With the design we Chronostratigraphic Chart of the International Commission on have tried to communicate visually, in improved style, that the division Stratigraphy (ICS) in their conference packages. The ICS Chart is a of Phanerozoic geological time is irregular and governed by the hierarchy of chronostratigraphic units (e.g. Systems, Series, and stratigraphical successions on which the units were originally defined, Stages) on which geochronological units (e.g. Periods, Epochs, and to which many subsequent revisions have been made. The chart design Ages) are based. With the addition of calibrated numerical ages for is intended to be advantageous in the daily use for both professional unit boundaries it serves as the International Geological Timescale. geologists and other users alike. The ICS Chart caters to a range of users: geologists that are relatively new to a particular time-stratigraphic interval and seek to place named Global divisions and ‘Golden Spikes’ divisions in their correct order and hierarchical structure, professionals who need to look up the latest specific estimates of numerical ages, Units of all ranks are in the process of being defined by GSSPs earth science students at all levels, and the general public interested for their lower boundaries, including those of the Archean and in the long history of the Earth. For the International Commission on Proterozoic, the latter long defined by Global Standard Stratigraphic Stratigraphy, the chart is also important for communicating the Ages (GSSA). The status of each GSSP is displayed in the chart by progress in formalising a single set of global chronostratigraphic units small golden-spike icons at the base of the divisions that they define. defined by specific boundaries, and for communicating standards of The status of each GSSA is indicated similarly with clock icons. colour coding the divisions for use on geological maps and sections, For boundaries in the Phanerozoic for which no GSSP is currently using the scheme established by the Commission for the Geological ratified, or which lack constraining numerical ages, an approximate Map of the World (CGMW: www.ccgm.org ). Furthermore, the numerical age (~) is provided. Note that numerical ages do not define Commission on the Management and Application of Geoscience units in the Phanerozoic and the Ediacaran, they are only defined by Information (CGI) of the International Union of Geological Sciences GSSPs. Episodes Vol. 36, no. 3 200 201 INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2013/01 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Erathem / Era System / Period GSSP GSSP age (Ma) GSSP GSSA EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon GSSP age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 ~ 541.0 ±1.0 Holocene Ediacaran 0.0117 Tithonian Upper 152.1 ±0.9 Famennian ~ 635 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Neo- Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 850 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.806 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian 1000 Callovian 166.1 ±1.2 Quaternary Gelasian 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian 2.588 Bathonian 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Middle Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.62 Pliensbachian Statherian Serravallian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Langhian Sinemurian Proterozoic Neogene Orosirian 15.97 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- Hettangian 2050 Burdigalian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 28.1 Gorstian Oligocene Upper Norian 427.4 ±0.5 2500 Rupelian Wenlock Homerian 430.5 ±0.7 Precambrian Neo- 33.9 ~ 227 Sheinwoodian 433.4 ±0.8 archean 2800 Priabonian Carnian Silurian Devonian Telychian 38.0 ~ 237 Llandovery 438.5 ±1.1 Meso- Bartonian Triassic 41.3 Ladinian Aeronian 440.8 ±1.2 archean Eocene Middle ~ 242 Rhuddanian Lutetian Anisian 443.4 ±1.5 3200 47.8 247.2 Hirnantian 445.2 ±1.4 Paleo- Olenekian 251.2 Ypresian Lower Katian Archean archean Paleogene Induan 252.17 ±0.06 Upper 56.0 Changhsingian 453.0 ±0.7 3600 Thanetian 254.14 ±0.07 59.2 Lopingian Sandbian Eo- Wuchiapingian Paleozoic Paleocene Selandian 259.8 ±0.4 458.4 ±0.9 archean Phanerozoic Phanerozoic Phanerozoic 61.6 Capitanian Darriwilian 4000 Danian 265.1 ±0.4 Middle 66.0 467.3 ±1.1 Guadalupian Wordian Dapingian Hadean Maastrichtian 268.8 ±0.5 470.0 ±1.4 Roadian Ordovician ~ 4600 72.1 ±0.2 272.3 ±0.5 Floian Campanian Kungurian Lower 477.7 ±1.4 Units of all ranks are in the process of being defined by Global 283.5 ±0.6 Tremadocian Boundary Stratotype Section and Points (GSSP) for their lower 83.6 ±0.2 Permian Santonian 485.4 ±1.9 boundaries, including those of the Archean and Proterozoic, long Upper 86.3 ±0.5 Artinskian defined by Global Standard Stratigraphic Ages (GSSA). Charts and Cisuralian 290.1 ±0.26 Stage 10 Coniacian ~ 489.5 detailed information on ratified GSSPs are available at the website 89.8 ±0.3 Sakmarian http://www.stratigraphy.org. The URL to this chart is found below. 295.0 ±0.18 Furongian Jiangshanian Turonian ~ 494 Asselian Numerical ages are subject to revision and do not define units in 93.9 298.9 ±0.15 Paibian ~ 497 Cenomanian Gzhelian Guzhangian the Phanerozoic and the Ediacaran; only GSSPs do. For boundaries 100.5 Upper 303.7 ±0.1 ~ 500.5 in the Phanerozoic without ratified GSSPs or without constrained Kasimovian 307.0 ±0.1 numerical ages, an approximate numerical age (~) is provided. Paleozoic Series 3 Drumian Albian ~ 504.5 Middle Moscovian Numerical ages for all systems except Permian,Triassic, Cretaceous ~ 113.0 315.2 ±0.2 Stage 5 Mesozoic and Precambrian are taken from ‘A Geologic Time Scale 2012’ by Cretaceous ~ 509 Aptian Lower Bashkirian Stage 4 Gradstein et al. (2012); those for the Permian, Triassic and Pennsylvanian 323.2 ±0.4 Cretaceous were provided by the relevant ICS subcommissions. ~ 125.0 Series 2 ~ 514 Upper Serpukhovian Cambrian Stage 3 Barremian 330.9 ±0.2 Lower ~ 129.4 ~ 521 Hauterivian Coloring followsfollows the the Commission Commission for for the the ~ 132.9 Middle Visean Stage 2 Geological MapMap of of the the World.
Recommended publications
  • Do Gssps Render Dual Time-Rock/Time Classification and Nomenclature Redundant?

    Do Gssps Render Dual Time-Rock/Time Classification and Nomenclature Redundant?

    Do GSSPs render dual time-rock/time classification and nomenclature redundant? Ismael Ferrusquía-Villafranca1 Robert M. Easton2 and Donald E. Owen3 1Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, México, DF, MEX, 45100, e-mail: [email protected] 2Ontario Geological Survey, Precambrian Geoscience Section, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, B7064 Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5, e-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Geology, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas 77710, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Geological Society of London Proposal for “…ending the distinction between the dual stratigraphic terminology of time-rock units (of chronostratigraphy) and geologic time units (of geochronology). The long held, but widely misunderstood distinc- tion between these two essentially parallel time scales has been rendered unnecessary by the adoption of the global stratotype sections and points (GSSP-golden spike) principle in defining intervals of geologic time within rock strata.” Our review of stratigraphic princi- ples, concepts, models and paradigms through history clearly shows that the GSL Proposal is flawed and if adopted will be of disservice to the stratigraphic community. We recommend the continued use of the dual stratigraphic terminology of chronostratigraphy and geochronology for the following reasons: (1) time-rock (chronostratigraphic) and geologic time (geochronologic) units are conceptually different; (2) the subtended time-rock’s unit space between its “golden spiked-marked”
  • Printable Celestial Navigation Work Forms

    Printable Celestial Navigation Work Forms

    S T A R P A T H ® S c h o o l o f N a v i g a t i o n PRINTABLE CELESTIAL NAVIGATION WORK FORMS For detailed instructions and numerical examples, see the companion booklet listed below. FORM 104 — All bodies, using Pub 249 or Pub 229 FORM 106 — All Bodies, Using NAO Tables FORM 108 — All Bodies, Almanac, and NAO Tables FORM 109 — Solar Index Correction FORM 107 — Latitude at LAN FORM 110 — Latitude by Polaris FORM 117 — Lat, Lon at LAN plus Polaris FORM 111 — Pub 249, Vol. 1 Selected Stars Other Starpath publications on Celestial Navigation Celestial Navigation Starpath Celestial Navigation Work Forms Hawaii by Sextant How to Use Plastic Sextants The Star Finder Book GPS Backup with a Mark 3 Sextant Emergency Navigation Stark Tables for Clearing the Lunar Distance Long Term Almanac 2000 to 2050 Celestial Navigation Work Form Form 104, All Sights, Pub. 249 or Pub. 229 WT h m s date body Hs ° ´ WE DR log index corr. 1 +S -F Lat + off - on ZD DR HE DIP +W -E Lon ft - UTC h m s UTC date / LOP label Ha ° ´ GHA v Dec d HP ° ´ moon ° ´ + 2 hr. planets hr - moon GHA + d additional ° ´ + ´ altitude corr. m.s. corr. - moon, mars, venus 3 SHA + stars Dec Dec altitude corr. or ° ´ or ° ´ all sights v corr. moon, planets min GHA upper limb moon ° ´ tens d subtract 30’ d upper Ho units d ° ´ a-Lon ° ´ d lower -W+E dsd dsd T LHA corr. + Hc 00´ W / 60´ E ° d.
  • The Mathematics of the Chinese, Indian, Islamic and Gregorian Calendars

    The Mathematics of the Chinese, Indian, Islamic and Gregorian Calendars

    Heavenly Mathematics: The Mathematics of the Chinese, Indian, Islamic and Gregorian Calendars Helmer Aslaksen Department of Mathematics National University of Singapore [email protected] www.math.nus.edu.sg/aslaksen/ www.chinesecalendar.net 1 Public Holidays There are 11 public holidays in Singapore. Three of them are secular. 1. New Year’s Day 2. Labour Day 3. National Day The remaining eight cultural, racial or reli- gious holidays consist of two Chinese, two Muslim, two Indian and two Christian. 2 Cultural, Racial or Religious Holidays 1. Chinese New Year and day after 2. Good Friday 3. Vesak Day 4. Deepavali 5. Christmas Day 6. Hari Raya Puasa 7. Hari Raya Haji Listed in order, except for the Muslim hol- idays, which can occur anytime during the year. Christmas Day falls on a fixed date, but all the others move. 3 A Quick Course in Astronomy The Earth revolves counterclockwise around the Sun in an elliptical orbit. The Earth ro- tates counterclockwise around an axis that is tilted 23.5 degrees. March equinox June December solstice solstice September equinox E E N S N S W W June equi Dec June equi Dec sol sol sol sol Beijing Singapore In the northern hemisphere, the day will be longest at the June solstice and shortest at the December solstice. At the two equinoxes day and night will be equally long. The equi- noxes and solstices are called the seasonal markers. 4 The Year The tropical year (or solar year) is the time from one March equinox to the next. The mean value is 365.2422 days.
  • Calculating Percentages for Time Spent During Day, Week, Month

    Calculating Percentages for Time Spent During Day, Week, Month

    Calculating Percentages of Time Spent on Job Responsibilities Instructions for calculating time spent during day, week, month and year This is designed to help you calculate percentages of time that you perform various duties/tasks. The figures in the following tables are based on a standard 40 hour work week, 174 hour work month, and 2088 hour work year. If a recurring duty is performed weekly and takes the same amount of time each week, the percentage of the job that this duty represents may be calculated by dividing the number of hours spent on the duty by 40. For example, a two-hour daily duty represents the following percentage of the job: 2 hours x 5 days/week = 10 total weekly hours 10 hours / 40 hours in the week = .25 = 25% of the job. If a duty is not performed every week, it might be more accurate to estimate the percentage by considering the amount of time spent on the duty each month. For example, a monthly report that takes 4 hours to complete represents the following percentage of the job: 4/174 = .023 = 2.3%. Some duties are performed only certain times of the year. For example, budget planning for the coming fiscal year may take a week and a half (60 hours) and is a major task, but this work is performed one time a year. To calculate the percentage for this type of duty, estimate the total number of hours spent during the year and divide by 2088. This budget planning represents the following percentage of the job: 60/2088 = .0287 = 2.87%.
  • Soils in the Geologic Record

    Soils in the Geologic Record

    in the Geologic Record 2021 Soils Planner Natural Resources Conservation Service Words From the Deputy Chief Soils are essential for life on Earth. They are the source of nutrients for plants, the medium that stores and releases water to plants, and the material in which plants anchor to the Earth’s surface. Soils filter pollutants and thereby purify water, store atmospheric carbon and thereby reduce greenhouse gasses, and support structures and thereby provide the foundation on which civilization erects buildings and constructs roads. Given the vast On February 2, 2020, the USDA, Natural importance of soil, it’s no wonder that the U.S. Government has Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) an agency, NRCS, devoted to preserving this essential resource. welcomed Dr. Luis “Louie” Tupas as the NRCS Deputy Chief for Soil Science and Resource Less widely recognized than the value of soil in maintaining Assessment. Dr. Tupas brings knowledge and experience of global change and climate impacts life is the importance of the knowledge gained from soils in the on agriculture, forestry, and other landscapes to the geologic record. Fossil soils, or “paleosols,” help us understand NRCS. He has been with USDA since 2004. the history of the Earth. This planner focuses on these soils in the geologic record. It provides examples of how paleosols can retain Dr. Tupas, a career member of the Senior Executive Service since 2014, served as the Deputy Director information about climates and ecosystems of the prehistoric for Bioenergy, Climate, and Environment, the Acting past. By understanding this deep history, we can obtain a better Deputy Director for Food Science and Nutrition, and understanding of modern climate, current biodiversity, and the Director for International Programs at USDA, ongoing soil formation and destruction.
  • Equivalence of Current–Carrying Coils and Magnets; Magnetic Dipoles; - Law of Attraction and Repulsion, Definition of the Ampere

    Equivalence of Current–Carrying Coils and Magnets; Magnetic Dipoles; - Law of Attraction and Repulsion, Definition of the Ampere

    GEOPHYSICS (08/430/0012) THE EARTH'S MAGNETIC FIELD OUTLINE Magnetism Magnetic forces: - equivalence of current–carrying coils and magnets; magnetic dipoles; - law of attraction and repulsion, definition of the ampere. Magnetic fields: - magnetic fields from electrical currents and magnets; magnetic induction B and lines of magnetic induction. The geomagnetic field The magnetic elements: (N, E, V) vector components; declination (azimuth) and inclination (dip). The external field: diurnal variations, ionospheric currents, magnetic storms, sunspot activity. The internal field: the dipole and non–dipole fields, secular variations, the geocentric axial dipole hypothesis, geomagnetic reversals, seabed magnetic anomalies, The dynamo model Reasons against an origin in the crust or mantle and reasons suggesting an origin in the fluid outer core. Magnetohydrodynamic dynamo models: motion and eddy currents in the fluid core, mechanical analogues. Background reading: Fowler §3.1 & 7.9.2, Lowrie §5.2 & 5.4 GEOPHYSICS (08/430/0012) MAGNETIC FORCES Magnetic forces are forces associated with the motion of electric charges, either as electric currents in conductors or, in the case of magnetic materials, as the orbital and spin motions of electrons in atoms. Although the concept of a magnetic pole is sometimes useful, it is diácult to relate precisely to observation; for example, all attempts to find a magnetic monopole have failed, and the model of permanent magnets as magnetic dipoles with north and south poles is not particularly accurate. Consequently moving charges are normally regarded as fundamental in magnetism. Basic observations 1. Permanent magnets A magnet attracts iron and steel, the attraction being most marked close to its ends.
  • Calworks 48-Month Time Limit

    Calworks 48-Month Time Limit

    STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES CALWORKS 48-MONTH TIME LIMIT CalWORKs 48-MONTH TIME LIMIT ON AID Beginning July 1, 2011, an aided adult (parent, stepparent, and/or caretaker relative) can only get 48 months (4 years) of cash aid from the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program. This includes cash aid you got from California and other states’ Federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Programs. The 48-month time limit does NOT apply to: • Children • Child Care • Medi-Cal Benefits • CalFresh Benefits • Aid that you got from California or other states under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) Program before January 1, 1998. FACTS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE CalWORKs 48-MONTH TIME LIMIT Time Limit Exemptions - “Clock Stoppers” A month on cash aid does not count toward your CalWORKs 48-month time limit if at any time during that month you are: • Disabled (You must have medical proof of a disability that is expected to last at least 30 days.) • 60 years or older. • Caring for an ill or incapacitated person living in your home, which impairs you from working or participating in welfare-to-work activities. • Caring for a dependent child of the court or a child at risk of placement in foster care, which impairs you from working or participating in welfare-to-work activities. • A victim of domestic abuse and the county waives the 48-month time limit. • Living in Indian Country, as defined by federal law, or an Alaskan native village, in which at least 50 percent of the adults are unemployed.
  • International Chronostratigraphic Chart

    International Chronostratigraphic Chart

    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2015/01 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Erathem / Era System / Period GSSP GSSP age (Ma) GSSP GSSA EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon GSSP age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 ~ 541.0 ±1.0 Holocene Ediacaran 0.0117 Tithonian Upper 152.1 ±0.9 Famennian ~ 635 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Neo- Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic ~ 720 Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian 1000 Callovian 166.1 ±1.2 Quaternary Gelasian 2.58 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Bathonian 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Middle Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.63 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Langhian Sinemurian Proterozoic Neogene 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- Hettangian 2050 Burdigalian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 28.1 Gorstian Oligocene Upper Norian 427.4 ±0.5 2500 Rupelian Wenlock Homerian
  • The Indian Luni-Solar Calendar and the Concept of Adhik-Maas

    The Indian Luni-Solar Calendar and the Concept of Adhik-Maas

    Volume -3, Issue-3, July 2013 The Indian Luni-Solar Calendar and the giving rise to alternative periods of light and darkness. All human and animal life has evolved accordingly, Concept of Adhik-Maas (Extra-Month) keeping awake during the day-light but sleeping through the dark nights. Even plants follow a daily rhythm. Of Introduction: course some crafty beings have turned nocturnal to take The Hindu calendar is basically a lunar calendar and is advantage of the darkness, e.g., the beasts of prey, blood– based on the cycles of the Moon. In a purely lunar sucker mosquitoes, thieves and burglars, and of course calendar - like the Islamic calendar - months move astronomers. forward by about 11 days every solar year. But the Hindu calendar, which is actually luni-solar, tries to fit together The next natural clock in terms of importance is the the cycle of lunar months and the solar year in a single revolution of the Earth around the Sun. Early humans framework, by adding adhik-maas every 2-3 years. The noticed that over a certain period of time, the seasons concept of Adhik-Maas is unique to the traditional Hindu changed, following a fixed pattern. Near the tropics - for lunar calendars. For example, in 2012 calendar, there instance, over most of India - the hot summer gives way were 13 months with an Adhik-Maas falling between to rain, which in turn is followed by a cool winter. th th August 18 and September 16 . Further away from the equator, there were four distinct seasons - spring, summer, autumn, winter.
  • News Snippets

    News Snippets

    The newsletter of the CAMBRIDGE QUATERNARY ISSUE 36 LENT 2007 News Snippets Dr Steve Boreham recently appeared on Ray Mears’ BBC series ‘Wild Food’. For the full story see the newspaper article on page 6 of this issue. Core team in photograph: Steve Boreham, Julie Miller, Ray Mears and Chris Rolfe The Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science , edited by Scott Elias, was released in November 2006 and a copy has recently arrived in the department. The four volume work provides broad-ranging, up-to-date articles on all of the major topics in the field of Quaternary Science and is aimed at the undergraduate-level but also provides easily accessible, expert information for active researchers. Prof Phil Gibbard (University of Cambridge, UK) and Dr Juergens Ehlers (Geologisches Landesamt, Germany) wrote a section entitled ‘The History of Quaternary Glaciations’. The work is also available online via ScienceDirect. 1 Welcome! The Quaternary Palaeoenvironments Group welcomes Antii Pasanen from the University of Oulu, Finland. Antii has funding from the Vilho, Yrjö and Kalle Väisälä Foundation and from the Academy of Finland to conduct part of his PhD based at the University of Cambridge. His study focuses on the internal structures of glaciofluvial sediments, including glaciotectonic structures, and his study sites are in western Finland, north eastern Russia and East Anglia. He will be conducting sedimentological, tectonic and clast fabric analyses, and will be using ground penetrating radar methods. When he is not working, he enjoys sport, especially floorball (which is played in Cambridge!) and ice hockey. Seminar Dates February QDG talks to be held at 5:30 Fri 23 rd TBA pm in the Lloyd Room at QDG Christ’s College Cambridge.
  • Geologic Time – Part I - Practice Questions and Answers Revised October 2007

    Geologic Time – Part I - Practice Questions and Answers Revised October 2007

    Geologic Time – Part I - Practice Questions and Answers Revised October 2007 1. The study of the spatial and temporal relationships between bodies of rock is called ____________________. 2. The geological time scale is the ____________ framework in which geologists view Earth history. 3. Both _________________ and absolute scales are included in the geological time scale. 4. Beds represent a depositional event. They are _________ 1 cm in thickness. 5. Laminations are similar to beds but are ___________ 1 cm in thickness. 6. The idea that most beds are laid down horizontally or nearly so is called the (a) Principle of Original Continuity (b) Principle of Fossil Succession (c) Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships (d) Principle of Original Horizontality (e) Principle of Superposition 7. The idea that beds extend laterally in three dimensions until they thin to zero thickness is called the (a) Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships (b) Principle of Original Horizontality (c) Principle of Original Continuity (d) Principle of Fossil Succession (e) Principle of Superposition 8. The idea that younger beds are deposited on top of older beds is called the (a) Principle of Original Horizontality (b) Principle of Fossil Succession (c) Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships (d) Principle of Original Continuity (e) Principle of Superposition 9. The idea that a dike transecting bedding must be younger than the bedding it crosses is called the (a) Principle of Original Horizontality (b) Principle of Original Continuity (c) Principle of Fossil Succession (d) Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships (e) Principle of Superposition 10. The idea that fossil content will change upward within a formation is called the (a) Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships (b) Principle of Original Horizontality (c) Principle of Fossil Succession (d) Principle of Original Continuity (e) Principle of Superposition 11.
  • Quaternary Geology & Geomorphology Division Officers

    Quaternary Geology & Geomorphology Division Officers

    Quaternary Geologist & Geomorphologist Newsletter of the Quaternary Geology and Geomorphology Division http://rock.geosociety.org/qgg Spring 2006 Vol. 47, No. 1 Are these boulders part of an old moraine or a mass wasting deposit? The granite boulders are located on Table Mountain, near Sinks Canyon State Park (over man’s right shoulder), southwest of Lander, Wyoming. J.D. Love related this material to the Paleocene-Eocene ‘unroofing’ of the Wind River Range (skyline) and assigned it to a coarse-grained (near-source) facies of the Eocene White River Fm (1970, USGS Professional Paper 495-C). Recent preliminary 10Be/26Al age interpretations from similar boulders on Table Mountain (back, left) suggest these may be associated with mid-late Pleistocene glacial activity in the Wind River Range (Photo & preliminary data, Dahms). 1 Quaternary Geology & Geomorphology Division Officers Newsletter Editor and Panel Members -- 2006 and Webmaster: Dennis E. Dahms Officers – 6 Members, three of whom serve one-year Dept of Geography terms: Chair, First Vice-Chair, and Second Vice-Chair; Sabin Hall 127 and three of whom serve two-year terms: Secretary, University of Northern Iowa Treasurer, and Newsletter Editor/Webmaster. Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0406 [email protected] Management Board – 8 Members: Division officers and the Chair of the preceding year; also includes the Historian as an ex officio member. Past Chair: Alan R. Gillespie Chair: University of Washington John E. Costa Dept Earth & Space Sciences U.S. Geological Survey PO Box 351310 10615 SE Cherry Blossom Dr. Seattle, WA 98195-1310 Portland, OR 97216-3103 [email protected] [email protected] Historian: (Appointed by the Chair in consultation with 1st Vice-Chair: the Management Board) John (Jack) F.