DOCSLIB.ORG

Projects and Project Ideas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Projects and Project Ideas PROJECTS AND PROJECT IDEAS PROJECTS&PROJECTIDEAS– WHOLESTUDYAREA 72 PROJECTS&PROJECTIDEAS– LOCATION SPECIFIC 96 WATERDRAFT WATERSPACESPACE STUDY STUDY 69 QUICK GUIDE TO THE PROJECT PAGES Someoftheitemsareexisting The summary matrix list all W1. WILDING THE RIVER (1/4) projects, at various stages of of the projects and project development, while others are at ideas and summarise how DUNDAS CLAVERTON BATHAMPTON BATH SALTFORD KEYNSHAM HANHAM PROJECT CONCEPT concept stage. they meet a number of The River Avon and Kennet & Avon Canal corridor provides a series of connected diverse wildlife factors. habitats on the valley floor which supports the The following pages include a summary of 35 city’s wildlife. The River Avon corridor is inhabited by kingfishers and otters, as well many species project ideas that have been derived to revitalise of birds, bats and freshwater fish. Its ecological diversity and natural beauty provides an integral the waterways of the River Avon and the Kennet component of Bath’s future riverside character. & Avon Canal in Bath & North East Somerset. The A series of projects ideas are proposed that can OWNERSHIP improve habitats for wildlife and create attractive ideas have been identified and derived through: spaces for people to enjoy. Five nodes of valued habitats /species hot-spots Projects which relate to land owned have been identified along the River Avon running 1. Consultation and dialogue with the 4 project by the project Partners (Environment through Bath: partners, key stakeholders and the general public 1. Newbridge Agency, B&NES Council, Canal & River 2. Weston Island during 2016-17; 3. Norfolk Crescent Trust and Wessex Water) is flagged. 4. The Railway Station 2. Consideration of studies and technical evidence Additionally where there is third party 5. Pulteney Weir gathered by the WaterSpace partners over recent land involved this is noted. In many OUTLINE PROPOSALS years; cases projects involved more than Establish biodiverse pond species along river banks KEY one landownership. Most projects Environmental Nodes Naturalistic River Banks Artificial River Banks Wildlife Corridors from Significant woodland 3. Analysis of the results of Boater Surveys, Focus Establish species -rich woodland wider area habitats Groups and 1:1 interviews with commercial relate to assets in the control of the groundflora partners, at least in part. Terracing of walls with natural slope, enterprises and volunteer bodies undertaken planted with natural emergent species during 2016. Underwater planters with egg laying strips for fish, with fenders to protect The projects listed include low cost projects from boats that can be delivered by volunteers or on a Detailed asset maps are Inset vertical planters on sheet piling to small budget, as well as big ticket infrastructure included in Appendix 1. vegetate and naturalise river banks Railing planters along river wall – year- items, commercial projects and ideas that The full “call for ideas” round value for pollinating insects, birds can be encouraged through regeneration and responses from stakeholders and bats development. The WaterSpace Partnership has are included in full in Appendix 6. DRAFT WATERSPACE STUDY STUDY THEMES: ASSETS/LEISURE/ENVIRONMENT 78 focused on the project ideas that the partners can Key references to background directly support or champion, or which involve evidence and further technical Project Idea pages each have a similar layout and style to make them easy to read and accessible. their assets or relate to their fields of influence. information is summarised in The material submitted by third parties, as part of Appendix 10. the “call for ideas” process has also been included NEXT STEPS and developed within many of the project pages. Many, but not all, of these ideas have found The WaterSpace Partnership has developed an their way into the Study itself. We have sought STUDY THEME action and funding plan for 2017-22 (Appendix 12) to prioritise ideas which best matched with the The WaterSpace Study theme which identifies which of these projects will be Study aims and aspirations, and which gained the which the project idea relates to is given priority. agreement of all four partners. summarised here – multi-beneficial Other organisations, will be seeking to champion projects are sought wherever and take forward some of the other projects, and possible. we will work to support this. While delivery and funding for some of the project ideas is already secured and underway, other projects are at a more conceptual stage. WATER SPACE STUDY 70 QUICK GUIDE TO PROJECT PAGES PROJECT FACTORS APPROVALS AND CONSENTS There are a series of approvals or factors that may Project Funding Status Cost Score Environmental Community Score affect a given project, these are as follows: Development Status This section summarises The capital cost of projects Score This indicates the degree Planning Permission – outline and detailed This section summarises the funding status of has been estimated for a The benefit to wildlife and to which the project each project idea, is some number of the schemes for has current support or consents/reserved matters submissions how far proposals have biodiversity can be captured and discharge of conditions. progressed in terms of cases the costs are well which a design can be clearly to some degree, however awareness. design and development. defined and the project determined, however there in most instance a desk Low – Limited consultation has full or part funding. In will be assumption relating Listed Buildings – a site factor that may Some are early stage study can reveal potential to date or stakeholders require Listed building consent. concept project ideas, other cases, particularly aspects of the scheme constraint and opportunities unknown. where the project is more which cannot be defined at whereas others are projects for each project. In some Environment Agency – approval or conceptual there may be the time of design such as Medium – Stakeholders are being implemented and/or instances there will be consents, often for works within 8 metres no funding or cost scoping services, professional fees known and a programme of are on-site. The following requirements for Habitat consultation has occured. of a main river. broad categorises have been undertaken. The following and exclusions such as VAT. Stage 1 Survey work which High – Project is actively devised and it is noted that broad categories are These have categorised as will in turn highlight the Canal and River Trust consents, for promoted and has there may be more than one identified: follows: need for species specific example in relation to moorings and community support. stage of design to achieve Fully funded; Low – Projects less than surveys to inform the riverside uses.1 within each category, many Part funded (with for £100,000 assessment or planning projects have changed example a proportion Medium – £100,000 to processes. Wessex Water – Approvals for abstraction or licensing. status over the last year, this funding secured via £500,000 Low – Site has little or summary is correct as of contribution from new High – £500,000 + no biodiversity and/ A dot denotes that the above approvals and March 2017: development); or few opportunities to consents are required. One Dot = Concept/ No funding provide environmental Design idea – requiring a enhancement. feasibility report or further More detail Medium – Some 1In the case of Canal & River Trust Approval. In all cases the development to be taken on the current environmental value to be following consents would be needed: forward. - Canal & River Trust consent as landowner, which will only be funding and delivery protected and/or moderate granted where consistent with the requirements of the Charities Two Dots = Detailed status of various opportunities to provide Act 2011. It should not be assumed that inclusion of a scheme in this strategy will guarantee that the Trust’s consent as landowner Design (pre-planning) projects can be found environmental enhancement will be granted. allowing for a review of in the FUNDING AND High – High environmental - Marinas wishing to connect to the Trust’s canal system will options and in need of DELIVERY section of the require a connection agreement. value to the site or asset - 3rd parties will need to follow the Trust’s Code of Practice for further development. WaterSpace Study. requiring specialist advice Works Affecting the Canal & River Trust, and obtain the Trust’s consent, in order to ensure that our assets are protected. Three Dots and/or major opportunities - Agreement through the network access agreement process = Full design, ready to for environmental that new moorings, marinas or restoration schemes would not adversely impact on the Trust’s ability to maintain our levels of implement. enhancement. service or adversely affect navigational safety, amongst other things. See: https://canalrivertrust.org.uk/media/original/24335- water-resources-strategy.pdf and https://canalrivertrust.org.uk/ media/original/27629-environmental-framework-document.pdf. - An agreement with the Trust will be needed for moorings on its waterspace. Applications will be assessed against the policies for mooring along the banks of our canals and rivers in place at the time. - The Trust is a statutory consultee in the planning process and will consider how applications affect its assets and waterway users. WATER SPACE STUDY 71 PROJECTS&PROJECTIDEAS– WHOLE STUDY AREA WATERDRAFT WATERSPACESPACE STUDY STUDY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Desk-Based Heritage Assessment Report
    Desk-Based Heritage Assessment Report Project Ref: 16/2575 Client: Dorothy House Hospice Care 15 August 2016 Bristol & West Archaeology Planning Authority: Wiltshire County Council National Grid Reference Centred on: NGR ST 8248 6083 Author: Emma Whitcombe Report Status: Final Issue Date: 07/09/2016 BWA Ref: 16/2575 © Bristol & West Archaeology Limited No part of this report is to be copied in any way without prior written consent. © Ordnance Survey maps reproduced under the Open Government Licence (OGL). Parkfield House, Parkfield, Pucklechurch, Bristol BS16 9NS. Tel. 0117 9372450. Email [email protected] ©Bristol and West Archaeology , Desk-Based Heritage Assessment [Title] Desk-Based Heritage Assessment Report CONTENTS NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 2 BASELINE SURVEY ............................................................................................... 3 3 IMPACT STATEMENT ........................................................................................... 9 4 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 13 5 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ 14 FIGURES Figure 1: Study area with the approximate boundary outlined in red............................ 16 Figure 2: Detail of the study area. ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Turnpike Roads of the Bristol Region a Preliminary Study
    BIAS JOURNAL No 1 1968 Turnpike Roads of the Bristol Region a preliminary study The system of road improvement known as turnpiking had its origins in the mid- seventeenth century when an Act was passed in 1663 for the repair to the Old North Road in the counties of Hertford, Huntingdon and Cambridge, and for tolls to be levied at certain places to cover the costs of maintenance. Other roads were similarly dealt with in the succeeding years including that from London to Harwich in 1695-6 and two smaller stretches of road in Sussex and Gloucestershire shortly afterwards. The main period of expansion of this ‘movement’ did not occur until the second half of the eighteenth century and from then the turnpike system maintained its dominant position well into the railway era which was partly responsible for its death. Since the 1550s successive Highways Acts, based largely on the delegation of road repair responsibility to individual parishes, had failed to secure much of an improvement in general road conditions. The introduction of a simple commercial element, despite many abuses by turnpike trustees, brought about a marked improvement; most roads were getting the first regular, if unscientific, repair that they had ever had. The develop- ment of a systematic technology of road improvement and construction, in France by P.M.J. Tresaguet and later in Britain by engineers such as Metcalfe, Telford and McAdam meant that by the 1820s the major factor limiting road speeds was the capacity of the horse rather than the condition of the road surface. The Bristol region has a notable turnpike history.
    [Show full text]
  • Services in Bath H T
    A 4 3 1 B a t h R o y ©P1ndar Swainswick a a d Batheaston W 31 ©P1ndar ©P1ndar ©P1ndar ©P1ndar ©P1ndar ©P1ndar e ©P1ndar ©P1ndar n i r Lansdown e services in Bath h t a to Chippenham Park & Ride C 231 271 to Urchfont B C Elmhurst 272 to Bowerhill at o h 13 a I l Estate to Bristol Falconer Road nn p 37 i e t r F R 319 to Cribbs Causeway a o re a N d apier Z et Rd on tre 1 e S L d ©P1ndar h on A4 Box Roa A ig do Westwoods 4 H n R Le 6 oa Bathford ig d E h ast ©P1ndar Upper to Weston, N n Charlcombe Weston R d L Haviland Park a Kelston n t on s es v d W A o 14 er w w d v ©P1ndar a ie o Ri n C R V h l n Bathford ©P1ndar ©P1ndar ©P1ndar ©P1ndar il d ©P1ndar o ©P1ndar ©P1n dHar L a r H a d ill a lc Ro on n o L e m 272 13 e b Larkhall nue e u ve d 271 D A a n Fair eld Ba L o y ©P1ndar v Av e fi a o er L R 231 ld T n s a e r e n S P e s 13 fi o ’ s e a t l r A d s Fairfield 4 r s A k o b R u a 3 w u o o E r i 6 y Park a 3 H n v d ig a Bathford h R W S S o a ld F Bathford t a y e a B Dovers Park Kelston re fi ir t r e d h fi S a t M s R e d Park 43 a r o l A 1 y a d fo Weston C a d r 38.39.X39 to Bristol Kel d ro d st a w W mo on Road o re R R n la n ill C t o n H 6 n a Pe R R e o d o a an e 4 d n a d L ©P1ndar d oa n a o L R d t Oldfield School 37 Lansdown oa l p Holcombe a n a m n R a e n 319 e e n Can th o L d o Ba w v Newbridge d 272 n n d o o A m n v Lane r t a Weston a o A e D Bathampton v L o A Ri s o C nd a 4 e R Royal United 271 Grosvenor t Park 4 ne Holcombe Vale Z W A n Newbridge Sout Hospital Bath 7 231 Ke h e ©P1ndar Walcot Park & Ride
    [Show full text]
  • Keynsham Station I Onward Travel Information Buses Local Area Map
    Keynsham Station i Onward Travel Information Buses Local area map Key Key km 0 0.5 A Bus Stop LC Keynsham Leisure Centre 0 Miles 0.25 Station Entrance/Exit M Portavon Marinas Avon Valley Adventure & WP Wildlife Park istance alking d Cycle routes tes w inu 0 m Footpaths 1 B Keynsham C Station A A bb ey Pa r k M D Keynsham Station E WP LC 1 1 0 0 m m i i n n u u t t e e s s w w a a l l k k i i n n g g d d i i e e s s t t c c a a n n Rail Replacement Bus stops are by Keynsham Church (stops D and E on the Bus Map) Stop D towards Bristol, and stop E towards Bath. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2018 & also map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, CC BY-SA Main destinations by bus (Data correct at October 2019) DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP 19A A E Hanham 17 C Radstock 178 E Bath City Centre ^ A4, 39 E Hengrove A4 D 19A A E Bilbie Green 349 D High Littleton 178 E Saltford 39, A4 E 39, 178, A4 D Highridge A4 D 664* B E Brislington 349 E Hillfields 17 C Southmead Hospital 17 C 39, 178 D 663* B E Staple Hill 17, 19A C Keynsham - Chandag Bristol City Centre Estate 349 E 178** E Timsbury 178 E Willsbridge (for Avon Valley Bristol Airport A4 D 349 E 17, 19A C Keynsham - Park Estate Railway) Bristol Parkway ^ 19A C 665* B E UWE Frenchay Campus 19A C 39, 178 D Kingswood 17, 19A C Bristol Temple Meads ^ 349 E Longwell Green 17 C Cribbs Causeway 19A C Marksbury 178 E Downend 19A C Midsomer Norton 178 E Notes Eastville 17 C 19A A E Newton St Loe Bus routes 17, 39 and A4 operate daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Bath and Return from Hilperton | UK Canal Boating
    UK Canal Boating Telephone : 01395 443545 UK Canal Boating Email : [email protected] Escape with a canal boating holiday! Booking Office : PO Box 57, Budleigh Salterton. Devon. EX9 7ZN. England. Bath and return from Hilperton Cruise this route from : Hilperton View the latest version of this pdf Bath-and-return-from-Hilperton-Cruising-Route.html Cruising Days : 4.00 to 0.00 Cruising Time : 8.00 Total Distance : 23.00 Number of Locks : 2 Number of Tunnels : 0 Number of Aqueducts : 4 Bath has been designated a 'World Heritage City' with a history stretching back to the Roman Baths after which it is named and that can still be visited today. Moorings are available very close to the city centre and Bath is, without doubt, worthy of at least a couple of days of exploration. The medieval town of Bradford on Avon, just an hour from Hilperton, offers a very pleasant stopping point. Weavers' cottages cling to the side of the Avon valley, looking down across the old mills to the 'Broad Ford' on the river that gave the town its name. The splendid Dundas and Avoncliff Aqueducts both take the canal over the River Avon as it follows the river alley between Bradford and Bath. Claverton's pumping station and American Museum may be incongruent with each other but certainly offer to satisfy differing interests! Bath City and the spectacular Pulteney Weir and Bridge. Bath and the surrounding area is brimming with things to see and do. Designated by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site, Bath presents some of the finest architectural sights in Europe such as the Royal Crescent, the Circus and Pulteney Bridge, alongside a diverse collection of museums and attractions including the Roman baths, Jane Austen centre and Thermae Bath Spa.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterway Dimensions
    Generated by waterscape.com Dimension Data The data published in this documentis British Waterways’ estimate of the dimensions of our waterways based upon local knowledge and expertise. Whilst British Waterways anticipates that this data is reasonably accurate, we cannot guarantee its precision. Therefore, this data should only be used as a helpful guide and you should always use your own judgement taking into account local circumstances at any particular time. Aire & Calder Navigation Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Bulholme Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 6.3m 2.74m - - 20.67ft 8.99ft - Castleford Lock is limiting due to the curvature of the lock chamber. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Castleford Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom 61m - - - 200.13ft - - - Heck Road Bridge is now lower than Stubbs Bridge (investigations underway), which was previously limiting. A height of 3.6m at Heck should be seen as maximum at the crown during normal water level. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Heck Road Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.71m - - - 12.17ft - 1 - Generated by waterscape.com Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Leeds Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.5m 2.68m - - 18.04ft 8.79ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m. Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Crown Point Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.62m - - - 11.88ft Crown Point Bridge at summer levels Wakefield Branch - Broadreach Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.55m 2.7m - - 18.21ft 8.86ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m.
    [Show full text]
  • Part of Claverton Down SNCI) (Part of Rush Hill & Eastover Coppice SNCI) Areas Adjacent to Kennet and Avon Canal Ash Brake
    SNCI Site Name (part of Claverton Down SNCI) (part of Rush Hill & Eastover Coppice SNCI) Areas adjacent to Kennet and Avon Canal Ash Brake Ashcombe Wood Atgrove Wood and stream Avoncliff Wood Ayford Farm Babylon Brook Bannerdown, and Shockerwick and Woodleaze Woods Bath University (part) (part of Bathampton Down and Woodlands SNCI) Bathampton Down and Woodlands SNCI (part of ) Bathampton Oxbow Bathford Brook and adjacent land Bathwick Slopes (part of) (part of Bathampton Down and Woodlands SNCI) Bathwick Wood (part of Bathampton Down and Woodlands SNCI) Beach Wood Complex Beach Wood complex Beacon Hill Beechen Cliff Belle Vue Tip Bellflower Hill Bengrove Wood and adjacent fields Bitham's Wood and meadows Bitton to Bath railway track Bladdock Gutter Blagdon Lake SSSI and adjacent land Bowlditch Quarry SSSI Brake Wood Breach Hill Common Breach Wood and adjacent land Broad Mead field Broad Wood Broadhill Copse Bromley Farm mine Brown's Folly - Warleigh complex Buckley Wood, Lady Wood, and adjacent fields Burledge Common and adjacent fields Burnett Brook and woods By Brook and associated marginal habitats Cam Brook and adjacent land Cam Brook disused railway Camerton New Pit Tip Camerton Wood Carrs Wood Castle Wood Catsley Wood Charlcombe Lane field Charlcombe Valley Charlton Bottom and Queen Charlton Watercourse Charmy Down Chelscombe and Lansdown Woods SNCI Chew Valley Lake SSSI and adjacent land Chewstoke Brook Clandown Bottom Claverton Wood & Vineyard Bottoms Clay Pits Woods Cleaves Wood, adjacent woodland and fields Cleveland Walk and
    [Show full text]
  • Keynsham Report
    AVON EXTENSIVE URBAN SURVEY ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT KEYNSHAM DECEMBER 1999 AVON EXTENSIVE URBAN AREAS SURVEY - KEYNSHAM ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was prepared by Emily La Trobe-Bateman. I would like to thank the following people for their help and support: Vince Russett, project manager (Avon County Archaeologist subsequently North Somerset Archaeologist) and Dave Evans (Avon Sites and Monuments Officer, subsequently South Gloucestershire Archaeologist) for their comments on the draft report; Pete Rooney and Tim Twiggs for their IT support, help with printing and advice setting up the Geographical Information System (GIS) database; Bob Sydes (Bath and North East Somerset Archaeologist), who managed the final stages of the project; Nick Corcos for making the preliminary results of his research available and for his comments on the draft report; Lee Prosser for kindly lending me a copy of his Ph.D.; David Bromwich for his help locating references; John Brett for his help locating evaluations carried out in Keynsham.. Special thanks go to Roger Thomas, Graham Fairclough and John Scofield of English Heritage who have been very supportive throughout the life of the project. Final thanks go to English Heritage whose substantive financial contribution made the project possible. BATH AND NORTH EAST SOMERSET COUNCIL AVON EXTENSIVE URBAN AREAS SURVEY - KEYNSHAM CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 The aims of the report 1 1.2 Major sources of evidence 1 1.3 A brief history of Keynsham 3 2.0 Prehistoric archaeology (pre-AD 47) 8 2.1 Sources
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Agency South West Region
    ENVIRONMENT AGENCY SOUTH WEST REGION 1997 ANNUAL HYDROMETRIC REPORT Environment Agency Manley House, Kestrel Way Sowton Industrial Estate Exeter EX2 7LQ Tel 01392 444000 Fax 01392 444238 GTN 7-24-X 1000 Foreword The 1997 Hydrometric Report is the third document of its kind to be produced since the formation of the Environment Agency (South West Region) from the National Rivers Authority, Her Majesty Inspectorate of Pollution and Waste Regulation Authorities. The document is the fourth in a series of reports produced on an annua! basis when all available data for the year has been archived. The principal purpose of the report is to increase the awareness of the hydrometry within the South West Region through listing the current and historic hydrometric networks, key hydrometric staff contacts, what data is available and the reporting options available to users. If you have any comments regarding the content or format of this report then please direct these to the Regional Hydrometric Section at Exeter. A questionnaire is attached to collate your views on the annual hydrometric report. Your time in filling in the questionnaire is appreciated. ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Contents Page number 1.1 Introduction.............................. .................................................... ........-................1 1.2 Hydrometric staff contacts.................................................................................. 2 1.3 South West Region hydrometric network overview......................................3 2.1 Hydrological summary: overview
    [Show full text]
  • Long, W, Dedications of the Somersetshire Churches, Vol 17
    116 TWENTY-THIKD ANNUAL MEETING. (l[ki[rk^. BY W, LONG, ESQ. ELIEVING that a Classified List of the Dedications jl:> of the Somersetshire Churches would be interesting and useful to the members of the Society, I have arranged them under the names of the several Patron Saints as given by Ecton in his “ Thesaurus Kerum Ecclesiasticarum,^^ 1742 Aldhelm, St. Broadway, Douiting. All Saints Alford, Ashcot, Asholt, Ashton Long, Camel West, Castle Cary, Chipstaple, Closworth, Corston, Curry Mallet, Downhead, Dulverton, Dun- kerton, Farmborough, Hinton Blewitt, Huntspill, He Brewers, Kingsdon, King Weston, Kingston Pitney in Yeovil, Kingston] Seymour, Langport, Martock, Merriot, Monksilver, Nine- head Flory, Norton Fitzwarren, Nunney, Pennard East, PoLntington, Selworthy, Telsford, Weston near Bath, Wolley, Wotton Courtney, Wraxhall, Wrington. DEDICATION OF THE SOMERSET CHURCHES. 117 Andrew, St. Aller, Almsford, Backwell, Banwell, Blagdon, Brimpton, Burnham, Ched- dar, Chewstoke, Cleeve Old, Cleve- don, Compton Dundon, Congresbury, Corton Dinham, Curry Rivel, Dowlish Wake, High Ham, Holcombe, Loxton, Mells, Northover, Stoke Courcy, Stoke under Hambdon, Thorn Coffin, Trent, Wells Cathedral, White Staunton, Withypool, Wiveliscombe. Andrew, St. and St. Mary Pitminster. Augustine, St. Clutton, Locking, Monkton West. Barnabas, St. Queen’s Camel. Bartholomew, St. Cranmore West, Ling, Ubley, Yeovilton. Bridget, St. Brean, Chelvy. Catherine, St. Drayton, Montacute, Swell. Christopher, St. Lympsham. CONGAR, St. Badgworth. Culborne, St. Culbone. David, St. Barton St. David. Dennis, St. Stock Dennis. Dubritius, St. Porlock. Dun STAN, St. Baltonsbury. Edward, St. Goathurst. Etheldred, St. Quantoxhead West. George, St. Beckington, Dunster, Easton in Gordano, Hinton St. George, Sand- ford Bret, Wembdon, Whatley. Giles, St. Bradford, Cleeve Old Chapel, Knowle St. Giles, Thurloxton.
    [Show full text]
  • B&NES Water Space Study, Boater Survey Consultation Report
    B&NES Water Space Study Boaters Survey Consultation Report Bath and North East Somerset Council 14 November 2016 B&NES Water Space Study Boater Survey Consultation Report Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Bath and North East Somerset Council’s information and use in relation to the Water Space Study. ATKINS assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. Document history Job number: 5147613 Document ref: Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Final Draft Boater Report PM RL GW NR 14/11/16 Client signoff Client Bath and North East Somerset Council Project B&NES Water Space Study Document title B&NES Water Space Study: Boaters Survey Consultation Report Job no. 5147613 Copy no. 1 Document TBC reference Atkins B&NES Water Space Study | Version 1.0 | 24 October 2016 | 5147613 B&NES Water Space Study Boater Survey Consultation Report Table of contents Chapter Pages Introduction 4 1. Boaters survey 5 1.1. Introduction 5 1.2. Dissemination and publicity 5 2. Results Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.1. Overview Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.2. Reasons for living on a boat 7 2.3. Overview of answers Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.4. Summary 21 Appendices 22 Appendix A. Boater Survey 23 Appendix B. Written responses 24 Atkins B&NES Water Space Study | Version 1.0 | 24 October 2016 | 5147613 Introduction Focusing on the River Avon and Kennet and Avon Canal (Dundas Aqueduct to Bath to Hanham Lock), Bath & North East Somerset Council is working in partnership with the Environment Agency, Canal & River Trust and Wessex Water to develop an evidence base, undertake public and stakeholder consultation and identify opportunities to deliver enhancements to these waterways and adjoining land.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118)
    NELMS target statement for Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118) Your application is scored and a decision made on the points awarded. Both top priorities and lower priorities score points but you should select at least one top priority. Scoring is carried out by... Choosing priorities To apply you should choose at least one of the top priorities, and you can choose lower priorities - this may help with your application. Top priorities Priority group Priority type Biodiversity Priority habitats Priority species Water Water quality Flood and coastal risk management Historic environment Designated historic and archaeological features Undesignated historic and archaeological features of high significance Woodland priorities Woodland management Woodland planting Landscape Climate Change Multiple environmental benefits Lower priorities Priority group Priority type Lower priorities Water quality Archaeological and historic features Woodland Biodiversity - top priorities Priority habitats You should carry out land management practices and capital works that maintains, restores and creates priority habitats. Maintain priority habitat such as: • Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh • Lowland meadows • Lowland calcareous grassland Reedbeds Traditional orchard • Lowland dry acid grassland Wood Pasture and Parkland Restore priority habitats (especially proposals which make existing sites bigger or help join up habitat networks) such as: ● Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh • Lowland meadows • Lowland calcareous grassland Reedbeds Traditional
    [Show full text]