General Assembly Distr.: General 14 July 2009 English Original: Arabic/Chinese/English/ French/Russian/Spanish

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Assembly Distr.: General 14 July 2009 English Original: Arabic/Chinese/English/ French/Russian/Spanish United Nations A/64/135 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 July 2009 English Original: Arabic/Chinese/English/ French/Russian/Spanish Sixty-fourth session Item 95 (w) of the preliminary list* General and complete disarmament: transparency in armaments United Nations Register of Conventional Arms Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report is the seventeenth consolidated report issued by the Secretary-General since the establishment of the Register.** It contains data and information provided by 58 Governments on the international transfers of major conventional arms covered by the Register and additional background information for the calendar year 2008. Any additional replies received from Governments will be issued as addenda to the present report. Section II of the present report includes an index of information submitted by Governments and their replies on conventional arms transfers. Section III contains background information submitted by Governments on military holdings and procurement through national production. Section IV includes background information submitted by Governments on international transfers of small arms and light weapons. All relevant information on the Register is available electronically on the Register website of the Office for Disarmament Affairs at http://disarmament.un.org/ cab/register.html. * A/64/50. ** The first to sixteenth reports were issued under the following symbols: A/48/344 and Corr.1-3 and Add.1-3; A/49/352 and Corr.1-2 and Add.1-4; A/50/547 and Corr.1 and Add.1-4; A/51/300 and Add.1-5; A/52/312 and Corr.1-2 and Add.1-4; A/53/334 and Corr.1-2 and Add.1-2; A/54/226 and Corr.1 and Add.1-6; A/55/299 and Corr.1 and Add.1-6; A/56/257 and Corr.1 and Add.1-2; A/57/221 and Corr.1-2 and Add.1-3; A/58/203 and Corr.1-2 and Add.1-2; A/59/193 and Corr.1-2 and Add.1-2; A/60/160 and Corr.1-2 and Add.1-3; A/61/159 and Corr.1-2 and Add.1-3; A/62/170 and Add.1-3; A/63/120 and Add.1-3. 09-40242 (E) 030909 *0940242* A/64/135 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction ......................................................... 1–3 3 II. Information received from Governments.................................. 4–5 3 A. Index of information submitted by Governments................................. 4 B. Replies received from Governments on conventional arms transfers ................. 6 III. Information received from Governments on military holdings and procurement through national production ............................................................. 47 IV. Information received from Governments on international transfers of SALW.............. 77 2 09-40242 A/64/135 I. Introduction 1. The present report is the seventeenth consolidated report on the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms, and is submitted pursuant to General Assembly resolution 63/69. 2. The Office for Disarmament Affairs organized a number of promotional events related to the United Nations Register. They included a regional workshop on transparency in armaments for West African States, held in Dakar, Senegal, on 9 and 10 June 2009. The workshop was aimed at raising awareness of the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms among governmental representatives of the West African countries, enhancing practical skills while compiling national reports and encouraging greater participation of States from the region in the Register. 3. Furthermore, the Office for Disarmament Affairs produced relevant background publications on the subject, which can be accessed at the web page as follows: http://www.un.org/disarmament/HomePage/ODAPublications/OccasionalPapers. II. Information received from Governments1 4. Information received from Governments is presented below as follows: • Section A — an index received by the Secretary-General; • Section B — individual replies of Governments on transfers of conventional arms. Where appropriate, the relevant parts of notes verbale are reproduced. 5. The index of returns is provided for ease of reference. As regards the information contained in the index, it should be noted that a “yes” denotes a submission of data regarding imports and/or exports in relation to the seven categories of arms covered by the Register during the reporting period. For the purpose of uniform tabulation, responses by Governments that contained either “nil”, “none”, “0”, a dash (-) or which otherwise indicated that no exports and/or imports in the categories covered by the Register had taken place are reflected in the tables as “nil” reports. A blank space under data on imports and/or exports in the index of information indicates that no information was provided. In some cases, however, an explanation can be found in the note verbale of the country in question, as indicated above. Only those parts of the standardized forms that contain specific data and notes verbale of Governments providing relevant information, are reproduced in section B. Replies in the standardized reporting forms and the simplified “nil” reporting form or in notes verbale containing “nil” or blank reports are listed in the index of information only. __________________ 1 Documents have been reproduced as received; the designations employed do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities. 09-40242 3 A/64/135 A. Index of information submitted by Governments Background information Procurement Report Data on Data on International State Military through received on exports imports transfers of holdings national SALW production 1. ANDORRA 27.04.09 nil nil a 2. ARGENTINA 10.06.09 nil yes yes nil nil 3. ARMENIA 01.06.09 nil nil yes yes 4. AUSTRALIA 29.06.09 nil yes yes yes yes 5. BELARUS 03.06.09 yes nil 6. BELGIUM 25.06.09 yes yes yes yes 7. BELIZE 02.07.09 nil nil 8. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 23.06.09 nil nil 9. BRAZIL 29.05.06 nil yes 10. BULGARIA 22.06.09 yes yes yes nil yes 11. CANADA 25.06.09 yes yes yes yes yes 12. CHINA 09.06.09 yes nil 13. COSTA RICA 07.07.09 nil nil 14. CROATIA 22.05.09 nil yes yes 15. CYPRUS 21.05.09 nil nil nil 16. CZECH REPUBLIC 28.05.09 yes yes yes 17. ESTONIA 20.05.09 yes yes yes 18. FINLAND 29.05.09 yes yes yes yes 19. FRANCE 07.07.09 yes nil yes yes yes 20. GERMANY 24.06.09 yes yes yes yes yes 21. GRENADA 08.05.09 nil nil 22. HUNGARY 12.06.09 yes yes yes 23. INDIA 22.06.09 nil yes 24. IRELAND 27.05.09 nil yes yes 25. ITALY 02.07.07 nil yes yes yes yes b 26. JAPAN 31.05.09 nil nil yes yes 27. LATVIA 08.06.09 nil yes yes 28. LEBANON 02.06.09 nil nil nil nil 29. LIECHTENSTEIN 25.05.09 nil nil yes 30. LITHUANIA 20.05.09 nil nil yes yes 31. MALAYSIA 02.07.07 nil yes 32. MEXICO 27.05.09 nil nil yes 33. MOLDOVA 27.05.09 nil nil yes 34. MONACO 27.02.09 nil nil 35. NAURU 16.03.09 nil nil 36. NETHERLANDS 01.07.09 yes yes yes nil yes 37. NEW ZEALAND 29.05.09 yes nil yes yes 38. NORWAY 09.06.09 yes yes yes yes 39. PANAMA 11.06.09 nil nil yes 40. PERU 29.05.09 nil yes yes 41. POLAND 25.06.09 yes yes yes 4 09-40242 A/64/135 Background information Procurement Report Data on Data on International State Military through received on exports imports transfers of holdings national SALW production 42. PORTUGAL 11.06.09 yes yes yes 43. ROMANIA 16.06.09 yes yes yes nil yes 44. RUSSIAN FEDERATION 29.05.09 yes yes 45. SAMOA 05.06.09 nil nil 46. SEYCHELLES 01.04.09 nil nil 47. SINGAPORE 26.05.09 nil yes 48. SLOVENIA 09.06.09 nil yes yes 49. SOLOMON ISLANDS 13.04.09 nil nil 50. SPAIN 20.05.09 yes yes yes yes 51. SWAZILAND 24.06.09 nil nil nil 52. SWITZERLAND 28.05.09 yes yes yes nil yes 53. TAJIKISTAN 20.05.09 nil nil 54. THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA 18.03.09 nil nil 55. TURKEY 22.06.09 yes yes yes 56. UKRAINE 01.06.09 yes yes yes 57. UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND 08.07.09 yes yes yes yes yes c NORTHERN IRELAND 58. VIET NAM 30.05.09 nil nil a) Argentina also provided data on its military holdings of small arms and light weapons. b) Japan provided a paper on its “Policies on the control of arms export” as well as information on SALW procurement through national production. c) The United Kingdom provided also provided information on SALW destroyed by the Ministry of Defense between 1 January and 31 December 2008. 09-40242 5 A/64/135 B. Replies received from Governments on conventional arms transfers Argentina Reporting country: Argentina Original language: Spanish Calendar year: 2008 Background information provided: yes Date of submission: 10 June 2009 IMPORTS A B C D E Remarks Category Exporter Number State of Intermediate Description of Comments on (I-VII) State(s) of items origin location item the transfer (if not (if any) exported) IV. Combat USA 2 Sweden - SAAB 340B Transport aircraft V. Attack USA 2 UH-3H Transport helicopters 6 09-40242 A/64/135 Australia Reporting country: Australia Original language: English Calendar year: 2008 Background information provided: yes Date of submission: 29 June 2009 IMPORTS A B C D E Remarks State of Category Exporter Number of origin Intermediate Comments on the Description of item (I-VII) State(s) items (if not location transfer exporter) V.
Recommended publications
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 9 September 2014 English Original: Chinese/English/French/ Spanish
    United Nations A/69/124/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 September 2014 English Original: Chinese/English/French/ Spanish Sixty-ninth session Item 97 of the provisional agenda* General and complete disarmament United Nations Register of Conventional Arms Report of the Secretary-General Addendum** Contents Page II. Information received from Governments............................................ 2 A. Index of information submitted by Governments ................................. 2 B. Reports received from Governments on conventional arms transfers ................. 3 III. Information received from Governments on military holdings and procurement through national production ............................................................. 10 IV. Information received from Governments on international transfers of small arms and light weapons ...................................................................... 19 * A/69/150. ** The information contained in the present addendum was received after the issuance of the main report. 14-60679 (E) 190914 290914 *1460679* A/69/124/Add.1 II. Information received from Governments A. Index of information submitted by Governments Background information International Procurement transfers of Views on the through small arms Register/ Data on Data on Military national and light national State Report received on exports imports holdings production weapons policies 1. Argentina 30 June 2014 nil X X nil X .. 2. Australia 28 August 2014 X nil X X X .. 3. Belgium 17 July 2014 X X X .. .. .. 4. Bosnia and Herzegovina 27 June 2014 X nil .. .. .. .. 5. Brazil 26 August 2014 X X .. .. .. .. 6. Cambodia 2 September 2014 nil nil .. .. .. .. 7. China 28 July 2014 X nil .. .. .. .. 8. Grenada 5 September 2014 nil nil .. .. .. .. 9. Hungary 5 August 2014 X X X .. X .. 10. Republic of Moldova 28 August 2014 nil nil .. .. .. .. 11. Trinidad and Tobago 2 September 2014 .
    [Show full text]
  • TIKKA T3x TAC A1 Light Sniper Weapon
    2 SAKO DEFENCE Sako Ltd based in Riihimäki, Finland, is a leading European sniper rifle manufacturer and a member of the Italian based Beretta Holding Group. Sako Ltd was established in 1921. From a traditional firearms repair shop in the early 1920’s the company has developed into a highly automated modern production plant without forgetting the valuable know-how and craftsmanship of the past. Today, as part of the Beretta Defense Technologies alliance, Sako Defence covers all corners of the world delivering Military and Law Enforcement customers with a vast range of products and solutions specializing in state-of-the-art sniper rifles and match grade rifle ammunition. With the know-how and expertise gained through the decades of rifle making, Sako Ltd has also a long history of being a supplier of weapons and ammunition to the Military and Law Enforcement community. Today units in over 60 countries rely on Sako sniper rifle systems in their everyday operations. Sako Cartridges have always been an important part of our product portfolio. The start of ammunition manufacturing dates back to late 1920’s. Since the beginning Sako has been a reliable and trusted ammunition partner for Military and Law Enforcement end-users. With modern manufacturing processes, combined with independent ammunition R&D capability and testing facilities, Sako is able to develop ammunition for specific needs. Being a manufacturer of both, rifles and ammunition, Sako is able to combine the engineering and specification of the two, resulting in the best performance. Our mission remains to offer our customers the very best in accuracy and performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Mistral Albi
    MISTRAL ALBI is a lightweight, 360° turret, optimised for the protection of armoured or mechanised units as well as convoys and which, mistral albi additionally, provides crews with an excellent level of protection vehicle mounted twin mistral missile Mounted on armoured vehicles, MISTRAL ALBI has been designed to carry out all the usual air defence missions such as point defence, local air defence system area defence and, more particularly, defence of mobile units. MISTRAL ALBI benefits from all the advantages associated with the MISTRAL missile (Fire-and-Forget, ease of operation, unrivalled kill probability). The system is based on a lightweight foldable turret with 360° azimuth coverage, manually operated by the gunner. Two missiles are mounted on the turret, even when driving off-road. MISTRAL ALBI can be easily integrated on nearly all types of Armoured Personal Carriers or Light Armoured Vehicles. Six or more missiles can be carried on the vehicle, including two on the turret. • 2 ready-to-fire MISTRAL missiles The system can be operated autonomously, thanks to its thermal sight • Fire and Forget (passive sectorial surveillance) and IFF or integrated to a fire control and • Ease of operation co-ordination system such as the MCP (MISTRAL CO-ORDINATION POST) • Can be integrated to a fire control and co-ordination system or I-MCP (Improved Missile Control Post). such as the MCP MBDA Contacts Sales and Business Development 1 avenue Réaumur 92358 Le Plessis-Robinson cedex - France Tel. + 33 (0) 1 71 54 10 00 Fax + 33 (0) 1 71 54 00 01 [email protected] LAND www.mbda-systems.com MISTRAL 2 is a man-portable, fully digital, heat-seeking missile, designed to meet the requirements of all Name branches of the armed forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurosatory 2016 in Paris
    Published by Special Edition ISSUE 33 / JUN-8-16 Eurosatory 2016 in Paris From June 13th the defence community is again meeting for the Eurosatory exhibition in Paris, as a market place for products and services in the defence arena. According to COGES, the company that organises Eurosato- ry in cooperation with the French Ministry of Defence, about the same number of visitors and exhibitors are expected as in 2014, that is 200 official delegations from 120 countries. The international players are well represen- ted at Eurosatory. At present, 1,530 exhibitors have been registered, of which one third is from France. Other large contingents are from the U.S., Germany, the UK, Belgium and The tage of live explanations in accordance with Netherlands. In particular there are compa- the live demonstrations, supported by a big nies from Asia that are pushing their market screen projection. presence. Compared with 2014 the number The exhibition is accompanied by an extensive MASTHEAD of exhibitors from China and Korea is twice as programme with 60 conferences. The confe- large. Also South America and Eastern Europe rences complement the material displays and record slightly increasing exhibitor numbers. are to generate momentum for discussions ESD Spotlight Email newsletter of the bimonthly magazine Eurosatory is primarily dedicated to land among experts in almost all disciplines. “European Security & Defence” (ESD) combat technology including paratroopers, In essence, development trends have remai- Editor-in-Chief: Dr. Peter Bossdorf air defence and airborne combat support. In ned unchanged. What is new is a stronger Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Henning Bartels 2014 security technology and disaster mana- alignment towards changing threats.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 31 July 2001 English Original: Arabic/English/French/ Russian/Spanish
    United Nations A/56/257 General Assembly Distr.: General 31 July 2001 English Original: Arabic/English/French/ Russian/Spanish Fifty-sixth session Item 85 (s) of the provisional agenda* General and complete disarmament: transparency in armaments United Nations Register of Conventional Arms Report of the Secretary-General** Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction .......................................................... 1–10 2 II. Information received from Governments................................... 11–12 4 A. Composite table of replies of Governments ...................................... 5 B. Replies received from Governments ............................................ 8 III. Index of background information provided by Governments for the calendar year 2000 ...... 60 IV. Information received from Governments on military holdings and procurement through national production .............................................................. 63 Annex Views received from Governments in accordance with paragraph 5 (a) of General Assembly resolution 55/33 U .............................................................. 103 * A/56/150. ** Finalization of the present report was dependent on the receipt of a substantial number of submissions by Governments. 01-49573 (E) 200901 *0149573* A/56/257 I. Introduction 1. In accordance with General Assembly resolution 46/36 L of 9 December 1991, on transparency in armaments, the Secretary-General, on 1 January 1992, established the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms. In that resolution, the
    [Show full text]
  • Algeria Country Report
    SALW Guide Global distribution and visual identification Algeria Country report https://salw-guide.bicc.de Weapons Distribution SALW Guide Weapons Distribution The following list shows the weapons which can be found in Algeria and whether there is data on who holds these weapons: AK-47 / AKM G MAT 49 G AK-74 U MP UZI G Beretta M 12 U Norinco Type 81 G Dragunov SVD U PK G DShk G RPD G M60 G Simonov SKS G MAS 49 U Strela (SA-7 / SA-14) G N MAS 49/56 U Tokarev TT-30/TT-33 U Explanation of symbols Country of origin Licensed production Production without a licence G Government: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is held by Governmental agencies. N Non-Government: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is held by non-Governmental armed groups. U Unspecified: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is found in the country, but do not specify whether it is held by Governmental agencies or non-Governmental armed groups. It is entirely possible to have a combination of tags beside each country. For example, if country X is tagged with a G and a U, it means that at least one source of data identifies Governmental agencies as holders of weapon type Y, and at least one other source confirms the presence of the weapon in country X without specifying who holds it. Note: This application is a living, non-comprehensive database, relying to a great extent on active contributions (provision and/or validation of data and information) by either SALW experts from the military and international renowned think tanks or by national and regional focal points of small arms control entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Simonov SKS (& Close Derivatives)
    Weapon Identification Sheet Simonov SKS (& close derivatives) Variants and their distinguishing features VARIANTS BARREL DESIGN Simonov SKS (& close derivatives) (Model/manufacturer) Grenade-launching muzzle No grenade launcher • SKS; Russia ■ TYPE: RIFLE ■ ALSO REFERRED TO AS: SKS, SIMONOV • Type 56 ‘carbine’; China • Type 63; China • Type 63; North Korea • M59/66; Yugoslavia (Serbia) The Chinese Type 63 is not exactly a derivative of the SKS, but the M59/66 All other models weapon is sufficiently similar in appearance to include it in this Weapons ID Sheet. North Korean GAS REGULATOR Type 68 rifles are distinguishable from Chinese Type 56 versions Protrusion forward of the because they are stamped with gas regulator No protrusion a proof mark featuring a five- pointed star in a circle. Model illustrated: Simonov SKS, Russia Technical Information The SKS was developed in the Soviet Union Type 63, China All other models Calibre during the Second World War. It is a gas-operated, self-loading rifle. The weapon’s most distinctive 7.62 x 39 mm M1943 MAGAZINE Length features are the tubular appearance of the 20-round detachable box 10-round integral box 1023 mm receiver, which ends abruptly at the neck of the Weight (unloaded) stock, and a folding bayonet, which is permanently 3.8 kg attached to the barrel. Barrel length 524 mm Feed device 10-round internal box magazine Type 63, China All other models PROBABLE GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Sighting systems: Sighting systems Region State forces Non-state/illicit Fore: Post Western Europe BAYONET DESIGN Rear: Tangent, notch Eastern Europe ◗ Triangular ‘spike’ Single-edged ‘knife’ Operating system Middle East & North Africa ◗ ● Gas, self-loading Sub-Saharan Africa ● ● Points to include when recording Muzzle velocity information about the weapon: Central Asia ◗ ◗ 735 m/s 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Armored Infantry Fighting Vehicle
    SUMMARY AIFV Type : Armored Infantry Fighting Vehicle ARMORED INFANTRY FIGHTING VEHICLE Place of origin : United States Specifications : Dimensions : ● Weight : combat load 13.6 tons / empty 11.4 ton ● Length : 5.26 m ● Width : 2.82 m The AIFV is a tracked light armored ● Height : hull top front 1.85 m / rear 2.00 m vehicle that serves as an infantry fight- turret roof 2.79 m ing vehicle in several countries. It’s an ● Ground clearance : 0.432 m improved M113A1 armoured personnel carrier with 85% identical spare parts. Crew : 3+7 Armour : aluminium hull (40 mm) with spaced laminate steel armor on front and sides Main armament : 25 mm KBA-B02 cannon with ● Munition : 180 rounds ready; 144 in reserve ● Rate of fire : 50 rounds/min ● Muzzle velocities : 1.100 – 1.360 m/sec (depending ammo type) POWER PACK ● Firing height : 2.33 m GM Detroit Diesel 6V53 Turbo engine ● Recoil force : 2.500 kg Allison TX100-1A transmission Secondary armament : 7.62x51mm NATO Machine gun (not installed) ● Munition : 230 rounds ready; 1610 in reserve. MAX SPEED Smoke-laying equipment : 6 smoke grenade launchers mounted on the turret ● road 61.2 km/h Power pack : ● water 6.3 km/h ● Engine : GM Detroit Diesel 6V53 Turbo engine model 5063-5396 V-type watercooled engine ACCELERATION producing 265 hp at 2800 rpm 0 to 32 km/h in 10 sec ● Transmission : Allison TX100-1A transmission SUSPENSION ● Power/Weight Ratio : 19.29 hp/ton high strength torsion bars Max speed : road 61.2 km/h / water 6.3 km/h Acceleration : 0 to 32 km/h in 10 sec FUEL CAPACITY Suspension : High strength torsion bars 416 litres - range : 490 km Fuel capacity : 416 litres - range : 490 km Steering : mechanically controlled differential and pivot STEERING steering mechanically controlled differential and pivot steering Current operators : Bahrein 75, Chile (+169), Egypt (+1000), Jordan (500), Lebanon (16), Morocco (110), Malaysia (322), Philippines (71), Turkey EWS-ENCLOSED WEAPON STATION (+2000), United Arab Emirates (133) ● 25mm KBA-B02 cannon ● 7.26x51mm Nato machine gun FLANDERS TECHNICAL SUPPLY NV - SYLLAB SA J.
    [Show full text]
  • PRODUCT GUIDE Welcome to the World of Beretta
    2014 PRODUCT GUIDE Welcome to the World of Beretta At the core of Beretta is a passion. And then there is the stirring. The relentless search for balance. An understanding of the wild places. The cold fields of autumn. Between what has gone before and what is yet to be. The high grass and the low marsh. Rain and sun. Man and dog. Between then and now and tomorrow. , It s an understanding that is pure and real. This is the passion that drives Beretta. It,s in our genes. , It lives in the deepest reaches of the hunter s heart. And so, too, is it in our hearts. It,s why we exist. , The innermost corners of the shooter s soul. And it,s why we have endured for nearly 500 years. And it is everywhere. Because of one purpose. A field in Tuscany. A lake in Wyoming. The flash of a tail. One passion we are proud to share with you. The thunder of wings. The World of ARX100 Beretta See page 58 Gardone Val Trompia (Italy) - View of the facade of the “Villa Beretta,” Once the main living quarters of the Beretta Family 486 PARALLELO See page 14 A world of passion and authenticity. Beretta was born in 1526, during the height of the Italian Renaissance. Our oldest surviving company document shows how the Republic of Venice trusted us to build gun-barrels for the defense of that magnificent city. We were making history then, and have been making history for the last half-millennium by serving our customers with enthusiasm, integrity, and by being innovative without losing sight of our Italian heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,082,219 B2 Haanpaa Et Al
    US009082219B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,082,219 B2 Haanpaa et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jul. 14, 2015 (54) ORIENTATION INVARIANT OBJECT (52) U.S. Cl. IDENTIFICATION USING MODEL-BASED CPC .............. G06T 15/10 (2013.01); G06K9/0063 IMAGE PROCESSING (2013.01); G06K9/3241 (2013.01); G06T 15/00 (2013.01) (71) Applicant: Cybernet Systems Corporation, Ann (58) Field of Classification Search Arbor, MI (US) CPC .............................. G06K9/0063; G06T 15/10 USPC .......................................... 382/103, 206, 209 (72) Inventors: Douglas Haanpaa, Dexter, MI (US); See application file for complete search history. Charles J. Cohen, Ann Arbor, MI (US); Glenn J. Beach, Grass Lake, MI (US); (56) References Cited Charles J. Jacobus, Ann Arbor, MI (US) U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (73) Assignee: Cybernet Systems Corporation, Ann 3,976,999 A 8, 1976 Moore et al. Arbor, MI (US) 3,992,710 A 11/1976 Gabriele et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this (Continued) patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Primary Examiner — Gregory M Desire U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Gifford, Krass, Sprinkle, This patent is Subject to a terminal dis Anderson & Citkowski, P.C. claimer. (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 14/242,560 A system for performing object identification combines pose determination, EO/IR sensor data, and novel computer graph (22) Filed: Apr. 1, 2014 ics rendering techniques. A first module extracts the orienta tion and distance of a target in a truth chip given that the target (65) Prior Publication Data type is known.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Gouvernementaux Canada
    Public Works and Government Services Travaux publics et Services 1 1 Canada gouvernementaux Canada RETURN BIDS TO: Title - Sujet RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: SIMULATION ENTITY MODELS Bid Receiving - PWGSC / Réception des soumissions Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amendment No. - N° modif. - TPSGC W8475-135211/B 006 11 Laurier St. / 11, rue Laurier Client Reference No. - N° de référence du client Date Place du Portage, Phase III Core 0A1 / Noyau 0A1 W8475-135211 2014-03-20 Gatineau GETS Reference No. - N° de référence de SEAG Quebec PW-$$EE-048-26597 K1A 0S5 Bid Fax: (819) 997-9776 File No. - N° de dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME 048ee.W8475-135211 Time Zone SOLICITATION AMENDMENT Solicitation Closes - L'invitation prend fin at - à 02:00 PM Fuseau horaire MODIFICATION DE L'INVITATION Eastern Daylight Saving on - le 2014-04-25 Time EDT F.O.B. - F.A.B. The referenced document is hereby revised; unless otherwise indicated, all other terms and conditions of the Solicitation Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: remain the same. Address Enquiries to: - Adresser toutes questions à: Buyer Id - Id de l'acheteur Friesen, Manon 048ee Ce document est par la présente révisé; sauf indication contraire, Telephone No. - N° de téléphone FAX No. - N° de FAX les modalités de l'invitation demeurent les mêmes. (819) 956-1161 ( ) ( ) - Destination - of Goods, Services, and Construction: Destination - des biens, services et construction: Comments - Commentaires Vendor/Firm Name and Address Instructions: See Herein Raison sociale et adresse du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur Instructions: Voir aux présentes Delivery Required - Livraison exigée Delivery Offered - Livraison proposée Vendor/Firm Name and Address Raison sociale et adresse du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur Issuing Office - Bureau de distribution Telephone No.
    [Show full text]
  • Mg 34 and Mg 42 Machine Guns
    MG 34 AND MG 42 MACHINE GUNS CHRIS MC NAB © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com MG 34 AND MG 42 MACHINE GUNS CHRIS McNAB Series Editor Martin Pegler © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 DEVELOPMENT 8 The ‘universal’ machine gun USE 27 Flexible firepower IMPACT 62 ‘Hitler’s buzzsaw’ CONCLUSION 74 GLOSSARY 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY & FURTHER READING 78 INDEX 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION Although in war all enemy weapons are potential sources of fear, some seem to have a deeper grip on the imagination than others. The AK-47, for example, is actually no more lethal than most other small arms in its class, but popular notoriety and Hollywood representations tend to credit it with superior power and lethality. Similarly, the bayonet actually killed relatively few men in World War I, but the sheer thought of an enraged foe bearing down on you with more than 30cm of sharpened steel was the stuff of nightmares to both sides. In some cases, however, fear has been perfectly justified. During both world wars, for example, artillery caused between 59 and 80 per cent of all casualties (depending on your source), and hence took a justifiable top slot in surveys of most feared tools of violence. The subjects of this book – the MG 34 and MG 42, plus derivatives – are interesting case studies within the scale of soldiers’ fears. Regarding the latter weapon, a US wartime information movie once declared that the gun’s ‘bark was worse than its bite’, no doubt a well-intentioned comment intended to reduce mounting concern among US troops about the firepower of this astonishing gun.
    [Show full text]