DOCSLIB.ORG

BIOCHAR STANDARDS and CERTIFICATION PROGRAMS and Their Impact on Biochar Industry Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BIOCHAR STANDARDS and CERTIFICATION PROGRAMS and Their Impact on Biochar Industry Development BIOCHAR STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAMS and their impact on biochar industry development Kelpie Wilson Wilson Biochar Associates [email protected] Presented at 2014 ASA, www.wilsonbiochar.com CSSA, and SSSA Annual Blog at: www.greenyourhead.com Meeting, Long Beach, CA Wilson Biochar Associates 2 Wilson Biochar Associates: • I am an independent biochar consultant. I am also an editor at the newly launched Biochar Journal – covering biochar science and applications: http://www.biochar-journal.org • In 2011-2012 I was privileged to help facilitate the open, transparent, public process of drafting and finalizing version 1.0 of the IBI standards Wilson Biochar Associates 3 Biochar Certification and the Industry • Why Standards and Certification? • What do existing biochar standards cover? • Are certification programs effective? • What biochar qualities are the markets looking for? • What biochar qualities are researchers investigating? • What are some new biochar quality assays that should be developed? Wilson Biochar Associates 4 Why Biochar Standards & Certification? 1. To standardize characterization for research purposes 2. To keep unacceptable biochar products out of markets through testing and certification 3. To assist in market development by providing the means to match products to applications Wilson Biochar Associates 5 Biochar Certification Programs • IBI – International Biochar Initiative (2012) • EBC – European Biochar Certificate (2012) Wilson Biochar Associates 6 IBI & EBC - Different Biochar Definitions: Product only vs Product + Process Approach IBI EBC “Biochar is here defined as a charcoal-like substance that is pyrolysed from “Biochar: A solid material obtained from Biochar sustainable obtained biomass under thermochemical conversion of biomass controlled conditions and which is used for Definition in an oxygen-limited environment.” any purpose which does not involve its rapid mineralisation to CO2.”** The organic carbon content of biochar The biochar's carbon content must be Minimum must be higher than 10% of the dry higher than 50% of the dry mass (DM). Carbon mass (DM). Biochar materials are Pyrolysed organic matter with a carbon Content divided into 3 grades based on content lower than 50% are classified as increasing organic carbon content. Bio-Carbon-Minerals (BCM). * http://www.biochar-international.org/sites/default/files/IBI_Biochar_Standards_V2.0_final.pdf ** http://www.european-biochar.org/biochar/media/doc/ebc-guidelines.pdf Wilson Biochar Associates 7 Elements of IBI & EBC Standards Biochar Product or Process Parameters IBI EBC Feedstock restrictions (clean biomass) X X Feedstock sustainability (production and transportation) X Pyrolysis process certified (energy efficiency, fossil fuel use, energy generation, emissions) and verified with pyrolysis facility inspection X Toxicant analysis: • Thermally produced PAH, dioxins X X • Originating from feedstocks – primarily metals Biochar stable carbon content for carbon accounting X X Biochar properties include: pH, liming, particle size, bulk density, moisture, surface area, nutrients, volatile matter constituents, ash constituents and more X X Division of properties into basic required and advanced optional tests X X 3 biochar grades based on carbon content X 2 biochar grades based on threshold levels of PAH and metals X Wilson Biochar Associates 8 Evaluating Biochar Standards and Certification Programs Wilson Biochar Associates 9 Have these programs successfully standardized basic biochar material (product) characteristics? • Yes. Basic biochar product standards have been established by IBI & EBC • Efforts are underway to harmonize thresholds and testing methods between IBI & EBC • Hopefully this standardization is serving the biochar research community • Perhaps new tests need to be added for more meaningful biochar characterization? Wilson Biochar Associates 10 Have these programs kept unacceptable biochar products out of markets? • Unknown • No monitoring programs • Certification programs have low market penetration • However, they are still new (2 years or less) Wilson Biochar Associates 11 IBI, EBC voluntary adoption by industry • IBI – 3 certified products in US • Costly ($2000-$2500 per product – labs and fee) • No regulatory incentive • Other certifications (organic, etc) may have priority for markets • EBC – 7 certified producers in 5 EU countries; adopted by Swiss legislature • Costly, but… (1700 EUR per product – labs and fee) • Regulatory environment more compatible, justifies costs Wilson Biochar Associates 12 A Reason for Slow Adoption • Other certifications available with established value in marketplace, eg OMRI, which considers biochar to be a form of ash, a traditional organic soil amendment • Blended products can be approved as fertilizers by AAPFCO or as compost by the US Composting Council Seal of Testing Assurance Wilson Biochar Associates 13 Another Reason for Slow Adoption A sizeable portion of biochar now on the market in the US is a waste product – high carbon ash from biomass energy combustion (often more than 50% carbon). It is difficult to certify. Why? Because of the Process • Questions about consistency of product • In the absence of other controls, IBI requires quarterly testing to reliably certify Wilson Biochar Associates 14 Bioenergy Boilers • Legacy bioenergy boilers are producing agronomically valuable chars that are now on the market* *Brian Coughlan, Wood Ash Industries, Andrew Carpenter, Northern Tilth, John Miedema, Biological Carbon. Presenters, High Carbon Wood Ash, Session, 2013 US Biochar Initiative North American Biochar Symposium, Oct 13-16, 2013, Amherst, MA. http://scholarworks.umass.edu/biochar/2013/Scale/7/ Wilson Biochar Associates 15 Is there another way? • Could taking a process approach provide a more effective and more affordable quality assurance framework than frequent product testing? • BQM – Biochar Quality Mandate – attempts to develop such a framework for dioxins Wilson Biochar Associates 16 BQM - Biochar Quality Mandate v1.0 • Intended for UK implementation • Draws on both IBI and EBC • Expanded sustainability scope – provides guidelines for full biochar system analysis • Still in discussion draft • http://www.britishbiocharfoundation.org/?page_id=2045 Wilson Biochar Associates 17 BQM Approach to Toxicants • BQM proposes to certify clean feedstocks (low chlorine) and thereby avoid dioxin testing • Questions (from the BQM, p22): • Is this idea of exempting certain biochars from expensive testing requirements going to be acceptable to regulators? • If so, what level of evidence must be provided? e.g. elemental analysis of feedstock; or literature values for feedstock? Wilson Biochar Associates 18 Process Approach – are there existing control points for QA? Waste control regulations EPA boiler tune up rules Compost, fertilizer regulations Wilson Biochar Associates 19 Are Standards & Certification Programs Meeting Needs? 1. To standardize characterization for research purposes 2. To keep unacceptable biochar products out of markets through testing and certification 3. To assist in market development by providing the means to match products to applications Wilson Biochar Associates 20 What Do Markets Want? Wilson Biochar Associates 21 What are markets being told? Potentially certifiable biochar claims in US markets* From Easy to Hard to Certify: • pH or liming • Sorption properties • Surface area • Surface activity • Sustainability • Organic approved • Sustainable feedstocks • Climate Benefits • Stable carbon • Carbon Negative • Assurance of agronomic effectiveness • Increased soil water holding capacity • Less fertilizer use • Boost to soil life • Better crop growth, seed germination, brix, etc. *From a quick online survey of biochar retail product labels Wilson Biochar Associates 22 Can we develop new tests to certify: 1. Increased soil water holding capacity? 2. Less fertilizer use? 3. Boost to soil life? 4. Better crop growth, seed germination, brix, etc. Wilson Biochar Associates 23 New biochar tests proposed in BQM* Suggested Property Unit Method % of dry Soil column leaching Release dynamics of nutrients (P,K,N) mass or experiments mg/kg size Impact on soil aggregation To be confirmed declaration Soil water potential (available water g/g or g/ Tension table and content) cm3 pressure plate *From Table 2B: Optional properties for quality biochar (p24, BQM). Wilson Biochar Associates 24 What are researchers looking at? Number of Papers adsorption agronomic effects GHG emissions characterization system sustainability pyrolysis microcial impacts engineered materials physico-chemical changes in soil nutrient cycling composts and blends bioenergy soil water impacts toxics in biochar 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 I made a quick and dirty characterization of keywords in IBI’s biochar bibliography from 2014 papers as of Oct. 8 (total of 428 papers) Wilson Biochar Associates 25 Research-Market Intersections Number of Papers adsorption agronomic effects GHG emissions characterization system sustainability pyrolysis microcial impacts engineered materials physico-chemical changes in soil nutrient cycling composts and blends bioenergy soil water impacts toxics in biochar 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Where should we look for new tests that can verify biochar properties of greatest interest to markets? Wilson Biochar Associates 26 Biochar Impact on Soil Physical Properties and Soil Water Potential Recent studies point the way: • Peake, L. R., Reid, B. J., & Tang, X. (2014). Quantifying the influence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interaction of Biochar Type and Rhizobia Inoculation Increases the Growth and Biological Nitrogen Fixation of Robinia Pseudoacacia Seedlings
    Article Interaction of Biochar Type and Rhizobia Inoculation Increases the Growth and Biological Nitrogen Fixation of Robinia pseudoacacia Seedlings Qiaoyu Sun 1, Yong Liu 2, Hongbin Liu 1 and R. Kasten Dumroese 3,* 1 Key Laboratory of Non-Point Source Pollution Control, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Haidian District, Beijing 10081, China; [email protected] (Q.S.); [email protected] (H.L.) 2 Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation, Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35 Tsinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China; [email protected] 3 US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 1221 South Main Street, Moscow, ID 83843, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-208-883-2324; Fax: +1-208-882-3915 Received: 29 May 2020; Accepted: 23 June 2020; Published: 26 June 2020 Abstract: Adding biochar to soil can change soil properties and subsequently affect plant growth, but this effect can vary because of different feedstocks and methods (e.g., pyrolysis or gasification) used to create the biochar. Growth and biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) of leguminous plants can be improved with rhizobia inoculation that fosters nodule development. Thus, this factorial greenhouse study examined the effects of two types of biochar (i.e., pyrolysis and gasification) added at a rate of 5% (v:v) to a peat-based growth substrate and rhizobia inoculation (yes or no) on 15 15 Robinia pseudoacacia (black locust) seedlings supplied with NH4 NO3. Seedling and nodule growth, nitrogen (N) content, and δ15N 1000 were evaluated after 3 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Biochar As an Innovative Wood Product: a Look at Barriers to Realization of Its Full Potential
    BIOCHAR AS AN INNOVATIVE WOOD PRODUCT: A LOOK AT BARRIERS TO REALIZATION OF ITS FULL POTENTIAL May 2017 Harry Groot Jeff Howe, Ph. D Jim Bowyer, Ph. D Ed Pepke, Ph. D. Richard A. Levins, Ph. D. Kathryn Fernholz DOVETAIL PARTNERS, INC. Biochar as an Innovative Wood Product A Look at Barriers to Realization of its Full Potential Executive Summary In the previous Dovetail Report Biochar 101: An Introduction to an Ancient Product Offering Modern Opportunities (Groot et al. 20161) the bottom line was: “Biochar is a product with clear benefits but many questions yet to be answered.” That remains the case. However, ongoing research has expanded the knowledge base, and the debate about biochar’s value and cost effectiveness is narrowing as more is known. A barrier to further market growth is that the industry producing biochar is unsettled, with Photo 1. Biochar made from Pecan Hulls (photo by H. Groot) little agreement regarding product standards, message, or carbon accounting. There is an opportunity for more collaboration to resolve these issues, especially among the mid to large-scale producers. The most common use of biochar is as a soil amendment for high-value fruit and vegetable crops, including use in greenhouse and nursery operations, and there is already significant market acceptance in this sector. Biochar is also used to remove impurities and toxins in water filtration and soil remediation, and these applications appear to offer significant growth potential. Commodity crop production conceivably offers the potential for use of the greatest volume of biochar, but there is little information available about the relative cost and benefits of biochar in this application.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Timber Forest Products in Brazil: a Bibliometric and a State of the Art Review
    sustainability Review Non-Timber Forest Products in Brazil: A Bibliometric and a State of the Art Review Thiago Cardoso Silva * , Emmanoella Costa Guaraná Araujo, Tarcila Rosa da Silva Lins , Cibelle Amaral Reis, Carlos Roberto Sanquetta and Márcio Pereira da Rocha Department of Forestry Engineering and Technology, Federal University of Paraná, 80.210-170 Curitiba, Brazil; [email protected] (E.C.G.A.); [email protected] (T.R.d.S.L.); [email protected] (C.A.R.); [email protected] (C.R.S.); [email protected] (M.P.d.R.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-8199-956-6178 Received: 4 July 2020; Accepted: 22 August 2020; Published: 2 September 2020 Abstract: Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) are a consolidated source of income and acquisition of inputs from forest environments. Therefore, the objective of this work was to carry out a collection of publications on NTFPs in Brazil, until 2019, available in the Scopus database, presenting a bibliometric review and the state of the art of this theme from the evaluation of these publications, discussing the challenges of Brazilian legislation on NTFPs. After screening the articles of interest, 196 documents were evaluated, in which they were observed institutions and authors, analyzing networks of citations and terms used, areas of forest sciences and sciences that encompass the most explored biomes and the most studied species. The results showed that the concern to research on NTFPs in Brazil began in the 1990s, with an increase in the number of publications over the years. Besides that, the research on NTFPs is multidisciplinary, with emphasis on the areas of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroforestry News Index Vol 1 to Vol 22 No 2
    Agroforestry News Index Vol 1 to Vol 22 No 2 2 A.R.T. nursery ..... Vol 2, No 4, page 2 Acorns, edible from oaks ..... Vol 5, No 4, page 3 Aaron, J R & Richards: British woodland produce (book review) ..... Acorns, harvesting ..... Vol 5, No 4, Vol 1, No 4, page 34 page 3 Abies balsamea ..... Vol 8, No 2, page Acorns, nutritional composition ..... 31 Vol 5, No 4, page 4 Abies sibirica ..... Vol 8, No 2, page 31 Acorns, removing tannins from ..... Vol 5, No 4, page 4 Abies species ..... Vol 19, No 1, page 13 Acorns, shelling ..... Vol 5, No 4, page 3 Acca sellowiana ..... Vol 9, No 3, page 4 Acorns, utilisation ..... Vol 5, No 4, page 4 Acer macrophyllum ..... Vol 16, No 2, page 6 Acorus calamus ..... Vol 8, No 4, page 6 Acer pseudoplatanus ..... Vol 3, No 1, page 3 Actinidia arguta ..... Vol 1, No 4, page 10 Acer saccharum ..... Vol 16, No 1, page 3 Actinidia arguta, cultivars ..... Vol 1, No 4, page 14 Acer saccharum - strawberry agroforestry system ..... Vol 8, No 1, Actinidia arguta, description ..... Vol page 2 1, No 4, page 10 Acer species, with edible saps ..... Vol Actinidia arguta, drawings ..... Vol 1, 2, No 3, page 26 No 4, page 15 Achillea millefolium ..... Vol 8, No 4, Actinidia arguta, feeding & irrigaton page 5 ..... Vol 1, No 4, page 11 3 Actinidia arguta, fruiting ..... Vol 1, Actinidia spp ..... Vol 5, No 1, page 18 No 4, page 13 Actinorhizal plants ..... Vol 3, No 3, Actinidia arguta, nurseries page 30 supplying ..... Vol 1, No 4, page 16 Acworth, J M: The potential for farm Actinidia arguta, pests and diseases forestry, agroforestry and novel tree ....
    [Show full text]
  • Biochar Registration Aid
    Biochar Registration Aid ❖ Biochar means materials derived from thermochemical conversion of biomass in an oxygen-limited environment containing at least 60% carbon. Refer to Section 14513.5 of the Food and Agricultural Code. ❖ If your product includes a guarantee for biochar, you must submit a laboratory analysis that verifies that the total carbon content of the biochar ingredient is 60% or greater. ❖ If the laboratory analysis shows that the ingredient is not at least 60% carbon, the ingredient cannot be labeled as biochar. Choose another term to describe the input. Examples of possible acceptable terms are: ash, charcoal, or processed charcoal. Label Requirements: 1. Label must state the feedstock(s) for the biochar. For example: wood biochar 2. 100% Biochar products can only be registered as Auxiliary Soil and Plant Substances (ASPS). If biochar is blended with other soil amendment inputs, it can be categorized as a packaged or bulk soil amendment. 3. If International Biochar Initiative (IBI) certification claimed, provide a copy of the certification. Label Format 1. If the product is an Auxiliary Soil and Plant Substance (ASPS), add the percent of biochar being guaranteed under a “NON-PLANT FOOD INGREDIENT” heading. For example: NON-PLANT FOOD INGREDIENT 95%......... Wood Biochar 2. If the product is a combination product that guarantees nutrients, add the percent of biochar being guaranteed under an “ALSO CONTAINS NON-PLANT FOOD INGREDIENT” heading. For example: ALSO CONTAINS NON-PLANT FOOD INGREDIENT 95%......... Wood Biochar 3. If the product is a packaged soil amendment or a combination product that guarantees nutrients and other soil amending ingredients, biochar may be added to the soil amendment ingredient list.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Forest Activities Produce Over 80 Million Green Tons of Woody Biomass Residues Each Year, Creating a Renewable Energy Resou
    U.S. Forest activities produce over 80 million green tons of woody biomass residues each year, creating a renewable energy resource comparable in size to the annual production of oil from Alaska’s North Slope, yet no technologies have emerged that can economically utillize this material -- until now. -- Large capital investment to risk ratio: Centralized plants THE PROBLEM: typically require new, expensive, and complex technologies. LETTING VALUABLE NATURAL RESOURCES GO TO WASTE These facilities typically require long start up/operational time before realizing profits. Forestry residues are comprised of branches, tree tops, and small diameter stems left over after normal operations. This material is typically concentrat- -- High transportation costs & supply uncertainty: Large ed into “slash piles” and burned, wasting a valuable resource and creating plants require high volumes of feedstock. Transporting feed- air quality and health problems linked to smoke production. Despite growing stock is cost prohibitive (typically a radius of 30-50-miles is the interests in tapping this domestic renewable energy resource, woody bio- maximum). This leads to supply uncertainty and the risk of over- mass presents several unique challenges for integration into the mainstream exploitation of forest resources. energy economy. 2. Mobile Processors: Small-scale, portable technologies reduce Woody Biomass have prohibitively high biomass trans- transportation costs by bringing the conversion process to the forest. portation and production costs because of: Mobile processor prototypes produce solid and liquid fuel products at Low energy content per unit weight high energy conversion rates. While this approach shows promise, sev- High water content (typically 20-50%) eral limitations exist: Material distributed over large spatial areas Natural resistance to chemical conversion.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Carbon & Biochar
    SOIL CARBON & BIOCHAR WHAT IS SOIL CARBON? Soil carbon sequestration, also known as “carbon farming” or “regenerative agriculture,” includes various ways of managing land, especially farmland, so that soils absorb and hold more carbon. Increasing soil carbon is accomplished in three key ways: (1) switching to low- till or no-till practices; (2) using cover crops and leaving crop residues to decay; and (3) us- ing species or varieties with greater root mass. Double-cropping systems, where a second crop is grown after a food or feed crop, also keep more carbon in the soil. WHAT IS BIOCHAR? Biochar is another way of getting carbon into soils. Biochar is a kind of charcoal created when biomass from crop residues, grass, trees, or other plants is combusted at tempera- tures of 300–600°C without oxygen. This process, known as pyrolysis, enables the carbon in the biomass to resist decay. The biochar is then introduced into soils, where, under cer- tain conditions, it might sequester carbon for many hundreds of years. CO-BENEFITS AND CONCERNS + Improved soil quality: soil carbon − Reversibility: the carbon captured sequestration and biochar help restore via soil carbon sequestration and degraded soils, which can improve biochar can be released if the soils agricultural productivity and help soils are disturbed; societies would need to retain water. maintain appropriate soil management practices indefinitely. − Saturation: soils can only hold a finite amount of carbon; once they are − Difficulty of measurement: monitoring saturated, societies will no longer be and verifying carbon removal, especially able to sequester more carbon using via soil carbon sequestration is currently soil carbon sequestration.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Scale Biochar Production and Require All Feedstock to Be Loaded at the Beginning of Is Open at the Top to Allow Air to Reach the Burning Biomass
    Nebraska Forest Service, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Biochar Production Economics Selected Resources General Biochar Information: Fabricating a small scale kiln is most economical when you have small Scale International Biochar Initiative the materials on hand and the skills (i.e. welding) to manufacture it. www.biochar-international.org While small scale kilns are not necessarily cost-effective for commercial production of biochar these methods may be appropriate for: Biochar U.S. Based Biochar Information: U.S. Biochar Initiative • Nurseries, tree care companies, green industry biochar-us.org • Farmers and ranchers looking to utilize waste products production • Gardeners, permaculturists, small scale farmers Biochar for Forest Restoration in the Making Biochar Western United States. 2015. Wilson • Windbreak renovations Biochar Associates White Paper for The process of producing biochar is called pyroly- South Umpqua Rural Community • Loggers, forestry contractors sis. Pyrolysis, by definition, is the “decomposition of Partnership (SURCP). • material by heat.” It occurs in processes as simple as a www.wilsonbiochar.com Anyone interested in producing biochar for small, niche markets such as farmers markets campfire and as complex as a state-of-the-art biorefinery. Example: Assuming a biochar recovery rate of 33%, a 55 gallon drum Biochar as an Innovative Wood Product: A Look retort kiln would yield ~2.5 cubic feet of biochar per batch. One cubic Biochar production methods are scalable and can be at Barriers to Realization of its Full Potential. adjusted based on local conditions, feedstock 2017. Groot, et al. Dovetail Partners, Inc. foot of biochar retails between $30 and $60. Per batch, a profit be- tween $75 and $150 could be generated.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar Produced from Forest Residues Using Portable Systems
    Journal of Cleaner Production xxx (xxxx) xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Cleaner Production journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro Life cycle assessment of biochar produced from forest residues using portable systems * Maureen Puettmann a, Kamalakanta Sahoo b, c, , Kelpie Wilson d, Elaine Oneil e a WoodLife Environmental Consultants & Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials (CORRIM), United States b Forest Products Laboratory, United States Forest Service, Madison, WI, 53726, United States c Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, United States d Wilson Biochar Associates, United States e University of Washington & CORRIM, United States article info abstract Article history: Forest fires are getting extreme and more frequent because of increased fuel loads in the forest and Received 28 June 2019 extended dry conditions. Fuel treatment (i.e., thinning) methods to mitigate forest fires will generate Received in revised form large volumes of forest residues together with available logging residues that can be used to produce 22 November 2019 biochar. It has been proposed that portable biochar systems are economical means to utilize forest Accepted 3 December 2019 residues as an alternative to slash burning. In this study, the environmental impacts of biochar produced Available online xxx from forest residues using three portable systems [1. Biochar Solutions Incorporated (BSI), 2. Oregon Kiln, Handling Editor: Panos Seferlis and 3. Air-curtain Burner] were evaluated using a cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment approach. Envi- ronmental impacts were analyzed considering the various quality of feedstock, biomass collection Keywords: methods, different production sites, and various sources of power used in the production of biochar.
    [Show full text]
  • Biochar Production for Forestry, Farms, and Communities
    Biochar Production for Forestry, Farms, and Communities 1 CREDITS Author: Kai Hoffman-Krull Published by: Northwest Natural Resource Group www.nnrg.org In partnership with: Forage Funding provided by: USDA Risk Management Agency www.rma.usda.gov Cover photo: dreamdv2 via Pixabay.com 2 Photo: Matt Freeman-Gleason CONTENTS CREDITS ........................................................................................................................................... 2 CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 3 SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION: THE POTENTIAL OF BIOCHAR .............................................................................. 4 Farms ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Forests ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Summary of Biochar Production Methods ................................................................................. 7 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF BIOCHAR PRODUCTION ........................................... 8 Pyrolysis ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Key Feedstock
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects of Biochar Use in Forestry
    Prospects of Biochar Use in Forestry Deborah Page-Dumroese Hongmei Gu Nate Anderson Rick Bergman A lile background Using forestry feedstocks to: • Reduce wildfire risk • Lessen insect and disease risk • Improve soil water relaons • Healthy trees/forests • Soil resilience to drought and flood • 10 long-term forestry field trials Overview • Forest harvesFng and feedstock management • Changing forest producFvity • Understanding the benefits • Climate change miFgaon Historic Issues of Land Management in the USA • 1979 • “A major problem confronFng forestry is how to more efficiently harvest Fmber without creang unacceptable impacts on the forest environment.” • “The full uFlizaon of residual material leW in the woods following logging and thinning operaons, and disease, and insect aack, and windthrow has long been a source of concern and frustraon to the forest manager.” From: Environmental Consequences of Timber HarvesFng in the northern Rocky Mountains. GTR-INT-190 Too much of a good thing… • Sites with too much logging slash • Wildfire risk • Not feasible to broadcast burn • Piles are created (and burned) Common pracHces on many forest sites • Piled and burned • Biomass from harvest operaons • Burning alters soil condiFons • Long-term alteraons Long-term impacts of pile burning • Many hectares impacted from hot, concentrated fires • Loss of OM • Nutrient volalizaon • Few trees or shrubs • OWen non-nave species Forest Supply Chain Context Current harves,ng model: Forest biomass to bioenergy 1. Felling trees (harvester) 5. Trucking (chipped biomass) 6. BIOENERGY! 2. Moving biomass (forwarding) 3. Storage (drying) 4. Chipping (roadside or mill) Or: Forest biomass to waste 1. Felling trees (harvester) 6. NO ENERGY and no C seQuestra,on! 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Biochar on Plant Productivity and Soil Properties Under a Maize Soybean Rotation on an Alfisol in Central Ohio DISSERT
    Impact of biochar on plant productivity and soil properties under a maize soybean rotation on an Alfisol in Central Ohio DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ryan Darrell Hottle Graduate Program in Environmental Science The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Rattan Lal, advisor Jay Martin Peter Curtis Berry Lyons Copyrighted by Ryan Darrell Hottle 2013 ABSTRACT Here we investigate the application of biochar to a maize (Zea mays)-soybeans (Glycine max L.) rotation in the U.S. Midwest in order to assess the agronomic impacts and changes to soil physical, chemical and biological properties. Biochar is a carbon- rich co-product of thermal degradation of biomass precursor material, a process called ―pyrolysis,‖ intended for the use as a soil amendment as opposed to combusted for heat or energy. Biochar could offer a sustainable means of generating energy, sequestering atmospheric CO2 (thereby mitigating climate change), and increasing agronomic productivity of crops through soil quality enhancement. At a global scale biochar could sequester >1 Pg C yr-1, thereby substantially helping to mitigate climate change. At present, the majority of long-term field trials using biochar as a soil amendemenMg have focused on highly weathered and degraded soils mainly in the tropics and subtropics. Very little long-term field trials have been conducted on agroecosystems in temperate parts of the world. Our research aimed to fill this void, by conducting a 4- year field experiment (2010-2013) with oak-derived biochar from a slow pyrolysis process at ~425⁰C at three rates (0 Mg ha-1, 5 Mg ha-1 and 25 Mg ha-1) with 100% and ii 50% of nitrogen fertilizer (146 kg ha-1 N and 72 kg ha-1 N, respectively) on a maize - soybean rotation on an Ohio alfisol soil.
    [Show full text]