July'18 Barometer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

July'18 Barometer KONDA JULY’18 BAROMETER Political and Social Survey Series Evaluation of the 24 June Election Results Political Preferences Current Politics: Post-Election Expectations Social Mood Morale Index Barometer of the Agenda In accordance with the confidentiality provisions of the KONDA Barometer subscription agreement, this report shall not be distributed or circulated other than corporate use. KONDA EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF 24 JUNE 2018 GENERAL PARLIAMENTARY AND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 2 / 109 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 5 Evaluation of the Results of 24 June‘18 Elections ......................................................... 5 2. ABOUT THE SURVEYS AND THE ANALYSES ................................................................ 14 The Note Sent to KONDA Subscribers .......................................................................... 14 About Election Surveys and Their Publication Before the Elections ........................... 16 About the Analyses ......................................................................................................... 17 3. NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ELECTION .................................................................. 18 Number of Voters ........................................................................................................... 18 Voter Turnout .................................................................................................................. 19 Invalid Votes ................................................................................................................... 22 Election results ............................................................................................................... 23 Progress of Vote Rates Through the Years ................................................................... 23 Comparison of the Voting Rates of 2015 and 2018 ................................................... 24 Comparison of the Elections Based on the Number of Voters .................................... 25 Presidential Election Results ......................................................................................... 28 4. TRANSITIONS IN VOTING PREFERENCES ................................................................... 30 5. ANALYSIS OF THE GENERAL ELECTION VOTES .......................................................... 38 Social Analysis ................................................................................................................ 38 5.1.1. Social layout of the 24 June results ...................................................................... 38 5.1.2. Party electorate profiles ......................................................................................... 39 Analysis According To Electorate Size Clusters ............................................................ 42 5.2.1. Political Parties in the electorate size clusters..................................................... 42 5.2.2. Vote gain and loss in electorate size clusters ...................................................... 44 Analysis Based On Election Result Pattern Clusters .................................................... 46 5.3.1. Political Parties According to Election Result Pattern Clusters ........................... 46 5.3.2. Vote gain and loss in election result pattern clusters ......................................... 49 Regional Analysis ............................................................................................................ 51 5.4.1 Regional Performance of the Parties .................................................................... 51 5.4.2 Regional vote gain and loss ................................................................................... 56 District-Based Analysis ................................................................................................... 60 5.5.1 District-based election maps ................................................................................. 60 5.5.2 District-based election data ................................................................................... 77 5.5.3 Vote changes in those districts to the municipalities of which trustees have been appointed ................................................................................................................................ 82 5.5.4 District-based clustering analysis.......................................................................... 87 6. POLITICAL FRAGMENTATION ...................................................................................... 88 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 88 KONDA EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF 24 JUNE 2018 GENERAL PARLIAMENTARY AND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 3 / 109 Effective Number of Parties in the Parliamentary Elections ...................................... 88 Distribution of the Effective Number of Parties Across the Political Geography ...... 90 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 93 7. PROGRESS OF DIRECT PREFERENCES AND SELECTED FINDINGS ........................... 94 Progress of Direct Preferences Acoording to KONDA Findings ................................... 94 What Have the Election Process and Campaigns Changed? ...................................... 95 Electoral clusters .......................................................................................................... 101 Young people ................................................................................................................ 103 Kurds ............................................................................................................................. 104 8. GLOSSARY of TERMS ................................................................................................ 108 Questions and Response Options ............................................................................... 109 KONDA EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF 24 JUNE 2018 GENERAL PARLIAMENTARY AND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 4 / 109 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The survey which forms the basis of the July’18 Barometer report has been conducted on July 7-8, 2018 by face-to-face interviews with 2728 people in their homes in 156 neighborhoods and villages of 98 districts including the central districts of 32 provinces. Further, the analysis of the results of the 24 June 2018 General Parliamentary and Presidential Elections have been made on the basis of the temporary results announced by the Anadolu News Agency. Evaluation of the Results of 24 June ‘18 General Parliamentary and Presidential Elections We have used the district-based temporary results in our analysis on the 24 June election results, and the invalid votes and non-voters have been included in the analysis for the aim of understanding the preferences and behaviour of all voters, whereas the comparison of the vote loss and gain has been made with reference to both the 7 June 2015 elections and 1 November 2015 elections. The electoral turnout reached 88.5 percent in the 24 June elections, the highest rate encountered since the 2002 elections. There were no significant differences in the electoral turnout or the invalid ballot rates of the Presidential Election and the Parliamentary Election. It is observed that the electoral turnout increased towards the western regions. Southeast, Central East and Northeast Anatolia as well as the Eastern Black Sea regions show electoral turnout lower than the national average. Still, the electoral turnout analysis based on districts shows that in certain districts at the Southeast region, there has been a singificant decrease in the electoral turnout compared to the 1 November elections. This election has once again confirmed the polarization and the entrapment within identity politics. It is observed that the final KONDA calculations dated 9-10 June declared to the public on June 21 correspond to the electoral outcome within the margin of error. Parliamentary Election KONDA Election Result Ak Parti 37.9 36.9 CHP 21.7 19.6 MHP 6.1 9.6 HDP 9.7 10.1 Iyi Parti 7.1 8.6 Other 0.9 1.8 Swing voters - Non-voters / 16.6 13.3 Non-voters - Invalid votes Total 100 100.0 KONDA EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF 24 JUNE 2018 GENERAL PARLIAMENTARY AND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 5 / 109 Presidential Election KONDA Election Result Recep Tayyip Erdoğan 45.4 45.2 Muharrem İnce 24.5 26.5 Selahattin Demirtaş 9.0 7.2 Meral Akşener 7.9 6.4 Temel Karamollaoğlu 0.6 0.8 Doğu Perinçek 0.1 0.2 Swing voters - Non-voters / 12.4 13.8 Non-voters - Invalid votes Total 100.0 100.0 However, it is to be noted that the overlap of the KONDA measurements with the election results is beyond the mere success of KONDA in that it shows the extreme intensity and permanence of the political and social polarization Turkey has been going through. Although the vote rates seem to be changing, the social base the political parties rest upon does not really change. In view of the results: It is understood that taking into consideration the voting rates in the General and Local Elections held since 2002, the maximum level the Ak Parti has reached is just below 50 percent and the minimum level is around 42 percent. On the other hand, the CHP had carried the level of 20 percent which it had once been placed in, to 25 percent in the past 4 elections preceding the final
Recommended publications
  • Perspective Seta Dc Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research Perspective
    SETA DC WASHINGTON PERSPECTIVE SETA DC FOUNDATION FOR POLITICAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE The SETA Foundation at Washington, D. C. | www.setadc.org | November 2015 Series Editor: Kadir Ustun THE NOVEMBER 2015 ELECTIONS IN TURKEY: STABILITY AND RETURN TO THE CENTER A month ago, in an analysis of the June elections and possible drivers for the November elections, I argued that there would be several different possible influencers of voting behavior of the November 1st elections. Most of these factors seemed to have indeed played important roles in the AK Party’s victory in the elections yesterday. More than 48 million cast their votes on Sunday and the turnout rate was around 87 percent. The results of Turkish elections dem- KILIC KANAT [email protected] onstrated that the AK Party won another election victory and its 5th general election victory. The election resulted in a harsh disappointment for opposi- tion parties. The AK Party increased its votes to above 49.4 %, in line with the percentage of the vote it received in the 2011 general elections. It increased its percentage by 8.5 percent, its seats in the parliament by 59 member of the parliament and its votes by almost 4.5 million compared to June elections. This increase occurred across all electoral districts in Turkey, including the Kurdish populated southeast regions. In fact, the top four cities that AK Party increased its votes were cities of Eastern or Southeastern Turkey, Igdir (20 percent), Sanliurfa (17 percent), Bingol (17 percent) and Kilis (16 percent). The main opposition party, CHP, did not achieve a substantial increase in its votes, instead receiving voting percentages similar to previous elections, 25.4 percent of the votes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Yılı Ana Arter Listesi.Xlsx
    ÖNEMLİ UYARI: İşyerinin veya reklamın bulunduğu yer aşağıdaki listede yer alan anaarterlere cepheli ise İlan ve Reklam Vergisi Beyannamesinin İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesine, değilse İlçe Belediyesine verilmesi gerekmektedir. İşyerinin bulunduğu binanın anaartere cephesi varsa, bina üzerindeki tüm reklamların (Sokağa bakan cephedekiler de dahil) 5216 Sayılı Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kanun'unun 23/e maddesi gereğince İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi'ne beyan edilmesi yasal zorunluluktur. İSTANBUL BÜYÜKŞEHİR BELEDİYESİ 2021 YILI ANAARTER LİSTESİ İLÇE ADI GRUP ANAARTER ADI ADALAR 3 Akasya Cad.(KINALIADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Alsancak Cad.(KINALIADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Altınordu Sk.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Ayyıldız Cad.(HEYBELİADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Barbaros Hayrettin Cad.(BURGAZADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Büyük İskele Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Büyük Tur Yolu Sk.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Büyük Tur Yolu Sk.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Cami Sk.(BURGAZADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Çankaya Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Çınar Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Çınar Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Çınar Meydanı(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Gezinti Cad.(BURGAZADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Gönüllü Cad.(BURGAZADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Gülistan Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 İskele Meydanı(Büyükada)(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Kınalı Çarşı Cad.(KINALIADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Lozan Zaferi Sk.(HEYBELİADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Malül Gazi Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Nizam Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Refah Şehitleri Cad.(HEYBELİADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Şehit Recep Koç Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Sosyo-Demografđk Yapi
    5. SOSYO-DEMOGRAFĐK YAPI Ankara’nın Cumhuriyetin ilanı sürecinde üstlendiği rol ve Başkentlik işlevini üstlenmesi ardından yüklendiği görev ve sorumluluklar, süre içinde metropoliten nitelik gösteren bir merkez oluşumunu hazırlamıştır. Đç Anadolu bölgesinin en büyük kenti ve ülkenin nüfusu en yüksek ikinci kenti haline gelen Başkentte, il sınırlarındaki nüfusun çok önemli bir yoğunluğu, metropoliten kent olarak adlandırılabilecek çekirdek bölgede yaşamaktadır. Önemli bir nüfus odağı olan Ankara’daki demografik değerler 3 farklı düzeyde değerlendirilmiştir. 5216 Sayılı Kanun’un yürürlüğe girmesinden önce Ankara Büyükşehir Belediye Sınırını oluşturan 8 ilçe (Altındağ, Çankaya, Etimesgut, Gölbaşı, Keçiören, Mamak, Sincan, Yenimahalle), metropoliten kent olarak tanımlanmış olup, bu çekirdek 1. düzeyi tanımlamaktadır. 1976 tarihinde onaylanmış metropoliten alan sınırı ile önemli ölçüde çakışan Ankara Büyükşehir Belediyesinin 5216 Sayılı Kanun’un yürürlüğe girmesi ile oluşan sınırındaki nüfus ise, metropoliten alan olarak tanımlanabilecek ikinci kategoriyi oluşturmaktadır. Üçüncü kategori ise, istatistiki verilerin önemli bir bölümünün toplandığı ve NUTS-2 düzeyi olarak da tanımlanan Ankara il sınırlarındaki nüfustan oluşmaktadır. 2023 Başkent Ankara Nazım Đmar Planı, bu üç düzeye ilişkin demografik verileri ayrı ayrı derlemekle birlikte, Büyükşehir belediye sınırlarının içindeki nüfus olarak değerlendirilebilecek 2. düzeyde yoğunlaşmıştır. Ancak, 2000 yılı nüfus sayımı verilerin belediye sınırı olarak tanımladığı alan olan 1. düzey ve il sınırı olan 3. düzeyde derlenmiş verilerin bir kısmı bulunduğu haliyle değerlendirilirken, bir bölümü de, düzey 2 kapsamında çözümlenebilecek biçimde yeniden düzenlenmiştir. 5.1. ÜLKE VE BÖLGE ĐÇĐNDE ANKARA NÜFUSUNUN GELĐŞĐMĐ Ankara ilinin nüfus gelişimi irdelendiğinde, Cumhuriyetin kuruluşundan bu yana, ülke ortalamasının üzerinde bir nüfus artış hızı yakalandığı görülmektedir. Ankara ilinin, 1927 – 1935 döneminde yıllık nüfus artış hızı ‰34.7 iken 1990 – 2000 döneminde yıllık nüfus artış hızı ‰21.4 olarak tespit edilmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Eczane Listesi.Xlsx
    SIRA NO Eczane Adı Telefon Adres İlçe 1 BURÇAK 0312 347 30 71 Plevne, Babür Cd. No:14,Altındağ ALTINDAĞ 2 GÜLAY 0312 348 10 68 Battalgazi Mh, 882. Cd. No:112/C, Altındağ ALTINDAĞ 3 ÖYKÜM 0312 517 17 25 Aydınlıkevler Mh., Şht. Mustafa Baş Cd. 24/8, Altındağ ALTINDAĞ 4 AKALIN 0312 348 48 83 ALEMDAĞ MAH. 882.CAD NO: 141 ALTINDAĞ/ANKARA ALTINDAĞ 5 ÇAKIL 0312 317 76 17 ÖRNEK MAH. FAİK SUAT CAD. NO:10 ALTINDAĞ/ANKARA ALTINDAĞ 6 ILGAZ 0312 340 22 46 CELAL ESAT ARSEVEN CAD. YILDIZTEPE MAH. NO:291/1 HASKÖY/ALTINDAĞ ALTINDAĞ 7 BALIK 0312 316 10 03 GÜNEŞEVLER MAH. 126. SOK 9/A ALTINDAĞ 8 NİHAL AK 0312 260 99 22 Piyade, No:76, 1544. Cd. Etimesgut ETİMESGUT 9 CONSEPT ERYAMAN 0312 247 13 23 Yavuz Selim mah. 11.cad 7/A blok No:6 3.Etap Eryaman, Etimesgut ETİMESGUT AKCENTER 0312 279 19 17 Eryaman, 262. SOK. AKCENTER TÜRKKONUT BLOKLARI No:6 ETİMESGUT 10 D:91, 11 ELVANKENT MERAM 0312 228 12 11 Piyade Mahallesi, Ahi Mesud Bulvarı, Piyade Mah. 1815 Cad. No: 66\1, ETİMESGUT ŞİRİN 0312 261 11 12 Toki Yapracık Konutları Atayurt mah. Evliya Çelebi cad, Emporia AVM ETİMESGUT 12 20/9, Etimesgut Göksu, Metrokent Avm, Eryaman Mahallesi, Erzurum Kongresi Cd. ÖZGÜL 0312 271 58 08 ETİMESGUT 13 9/24, 14 AİLE 0312 226 74 88 Süvari, 1682. Cd. No:14-B,Etimesgut ETİMESGUT 15 KÜBRANIN 0545 862 84 35 30 AĞUSTOS MAHALLESİ NECİP FAZIL SOKAK 1/A ETİMESGUT 16 ŞAMİL 0312 226 00 44 PİYADE MAH 1681.CAD NO.26/B ETİMESGUT/ANKARA ETİMESGUT 17 ezgi altındaş 5336873487 Ayyıldız Mahallesi Trend Life Çarşısı, 1621.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey and the European Union: the Omesd Tic Politics of Negotiating Pre-Accession Kemal Kirisci Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
    Macalester International Volume 15 Hybrid Geographies in the Eastern Article 10 Mediterranean: Views from the Bosphorus Winter 2005 Turkey and the European Union: The omesD tic Politics of Negotiating Pre-Accession Kemal Kirisci Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/macintl Recommended Citation Kirisci, Kemal (2005) "Turkey and the European Union: The omeD stic Politics of Negotiating Pre-Accession," Macalester International: Vol. 15, Article 10. Available at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/macintl/vol15/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute for Global Citizenship at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Macalester International by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Turkey and the European Union: The Domestic Politics of Negotiating Pre-Accession Kemal Kirisci I. Introduction In May 2004, ten countries joined the European Union (EU), to be followed by two more countries most probably in 2007. Turkey, together with Croatia, is the next country in line to enter the pre- accession process for membership. Turkey was given candidate status in December 1999 at the Helsinki European Council summit. How- ever, accession negotiations with Turkey will only start if the European Commission concludes that Turkey has indeed met the Copenhagen political criteria and EU member governments make a positive deci- sion at their European Council meeting in December 2004.1 Unlike the case of other candidate countries, the decision “to give or not to give” a negotiating date to Turkey stands as a very great challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of the Parliamentary Elections in Turkey (22 July 2007)
    Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire Doc. 11367 12 September 2007 Observation of the Parliamentary elections in Turkey (22 July 2007) Report Bureau of the Assembly Rapporteur: Mr Luc VAN DEN BRANDE, Belgium, Group of the European People's Party I. Introduction 1. Following an invitation by the Chairperson of the Turkish Parliamentary Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, the Bureau of the Assembly decided, on 25 June 2007, to set up a forty-member cross-party ad hoc Committee to observe the Parliamentary Elections in Turkey to be held on 22 June 2007. On 29 July 2007 the Bureau approved of the list of the Committee members and appointed me as its Chairperson. 2. Based on proposals by the political groups of the Assembly, the ad hoc Committee was composed as follows: Socialist Group (SOC) Mr Piotr Gadzinowski Poland Mr Andreas Gross Switzerland Mr Tadeusz Iwi ński Poland Mr Pietro Marcenaro Italy Mr Neven Mimica Croatia Mr Theodoros Pangalos Greece Ms Fatma Pehlivan Belgium Ms Ruth-Gaby Vermot-Mangold Switzerland Ms Birute Vésaté Lithuania Ms Gisela Wurm Austria Group of the European People’s Party (EPP/CD) Mr Luc Van den Brande Belgium Mr Jose Freire Antunes Portugal Ms Ursula Gacek Poland Ms Gultakin Hajieva Azerbaijan Mr Mladen Ivani ć Bosnia and Herzegovina Ms Danuta Jazłowiecka Poland Mr Lucio Malan Italy Mr Julio Padilla Spain Ms Marietta de Pourbaix-Lundin Sweden Mr Bernard Schreiner France Mr Piotr Wach Poland F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex, e-mail: [email protected] http://assembly.coe.int tel : + 33 3 88 41 2000, fax + 33 3 88 41 2776 Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Refugees Impact Voting Behavior in the Host Country? Evidence from Syrian Refugee Inflows in Turkey
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 10849 Do Refugees Impact Voting Behavior in the Host Country? Evidence from Syrian Refugee Inflows in Turkey Onur Altindag Neeraj Kaushal JUNE 2017 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 10849 Do Refugees Impact Voting Behavior in the Host Country? Evidence from Syrian Refugee Inflows in Turkey Onur Altindag Harvard University Neeraj Kaushal Columbia University, IZA and NBER JUNE 2017 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: [email protected] www.iza.org IZA DP No. 10849 JUNE 2017 ABSTRACT Do Refugees Impact Voting Behavior in the Host Country? Evidence from Syrian Refugee Inflows in Turkey* We study the effect of an influx of approximately three million Syrian refugees on voting behavior in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Sira No Adi Soyadi Unvani Önceki Çaliştiği Ilçe Önceki
    129. EK TERCİH VE YERLEŞTİRME İŞLEMLERİNDE YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ YAPAN VE AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ HİZMET SÖZLEŞMESİ İMZALAYAN HEKİM LİSTESİ ÖNCEKİ ÇALIŞTIĞI SIRA YERLEŞTİĞİ AİLE GÖREVE ADI SOYADI UNVANI ÖNCEKİ ÇALIŞTIĞI İLÇE ÖNCEKİ ÇALIŞTIĞI AİLE SAĞLIĞI MERKEZİ AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ YENİ YERLEŞTİĞİ İLÇE YENİ YERLEŞTİĞİ AİLE SAĞLIĞI MERKEZİ BAŞVURU ŞEKLİ NO HEKİMLİĞİ BİRİMİ BAŞLAYIŞ TARİHİ BİRİMİ 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 1 HAKAN SARIKAYA AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ UZMANI BEYLİKDÜZÜ Kavaklı 2 Nolu ASM 34.12.024 AVCILAR Bizimevler ASM 34.04.100 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 2 MEHMET BAYKAL AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ UZMANI BAĞCILAR Bağcılar 8 Nolu ASM 34.05.056 BAHÇELİEVLER Bahçelievler 5 Nolu ASM 34.06.095 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 3 ELVAN ANIL AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ UZMANI ŞİŞLİ Şişli 15 Nolu ASM 34.35.098 BEŞİKTAŞ Beşiktaş 1 Nolu ASM 34.10.020 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 4 MARIANNA MART PRATİSYEN ARNAVUTKÖY İmrahor ASM 34.02.082 ARNAVUTKÖY İmrahor ASM 34.02.030 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 5 SULTAN BAYSAL PRATİSYEN KADIKÖY Kadıköy 4 Nolu ASM 34.23.026 ATAŞEHİR Fetih Öz Çiftçi ASM 34.03.003 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 6 SALOMON FİDELY JARNE PRATİSYEN KADIKÖY Kadıköy 13 Nolu ASM 34.23.152 ATAŞEHİR Küçükbakkalköy ASM 34.03.044 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 7 HATİCE ARSLAN PRATİSYEN SANCAKTEPE Sancaktepe 28 Nolu ASM 34.29.132 ATAŞEHİR Küçükbakkalköy ASM 34.03.046 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 8 RUKEN AYDIN PRATİSYEN ÜMRANİYE Ümraniye 30 Nolu ASM 34.37.194 ATAŞEHİR Ataşehir ASM 34.03.062 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 9 MUHAMMED MARAŞLI PRATİSYEN AVCILAR Yeşilkent 2 Nolu ASM 34.04.139 AVCILAR Yeşilkent 2
    [Show full text]
  • The Place of the Young Turk Revolution in Turkish History
    THE PLACE OF THE YOUNG TURK REVOLUTION IN TURKISH HISTORY. Prof. Dr. sı.. AKŞİN •• i. Introduciioa J'be Turu in History: The Turks of Turkeyarepan of the Tuılcic.pcoples who. back in history. were once concentrated in Central Asia. Central Asia can be roughly described as the region to the north and the north-west nf the China Wall. The China Wall was built to koopthe namadie peoples -ineloding the Tuikic peoples- out of China. The Wall also roughly corresponded to the frontler of feıtile iand wbere agriculture could be practised. In Centtal Asia the tand was generally not suitable for qriculıure. but could sustain the animal hents of the nomads. The fmt "state" of the Turlcicpeoples was the Empiıe of the Hmıs. for which the apprOximate dates 220 BC-216 AD are given. But whether or not this formatian can be considered a state or empire in the proper sense of the word is not clear. because the Hmıs did not use the written word. Probably this fonnatian was a coofederation of tribes. raiher' than a state. The same can probobly he said for the Göktürks (552-745). though at the end of their primacy they hegan to use writing. The third important poIitical formation of the Turkic peoples was the Uygur State (745-940). By the end of the 8th century. two important developments took place among the Turkic peoples. 1) A great number of them hegan to move west, Lo Transoxania and contiguous regions and 2) they began to . adopt Islam. It seems that the proces of Islamization was a rather loog.
    [Show full text]
  • Ankara Ili Maden Ve Enerji Kaynaklari
    ANKARA İLİ MADEN VE ENERJİ KAYNAKLARI Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin Başkenti Ankara, Anadolu'nun merkezi bir noktasında kurulmuş olup, Kızılırmak ve Sakarya nehirlerinin kollarının oluşturduğu ovalarla kaplı bir ildir. Genel Müdürlüğümüzün Ankara ili ve yakın çevresinde yaptığı çalışmalar sonucunda çok sayıda endüstriyel hammadde, metalik maden yatağı ve zuhurları ile jeotermal kaynaklar ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Metalik madenler bakımından ildeki en önemli madenler altın, bakır, kurşun, çinko, demir ve manganezdir. Çubuk-Gicik altın sahasında 3-10 gr/ton altın değerleri saptanmıştır. Bakır-kurşun- çinko cevherleşmesi Kızılcahamam-Güvem Işıkdağı sahasında yer almakta olup, burada % 47 Pb, % 4 Zn tenörlü toplam 30 ton rezerv belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca yatakta yan ürün olarak da 3.5-9 gr/ton Au, 150-234 gr/ton Ag değerleri bilinmektedir. İlde çok sayıda manganez zuhurları bulunmaktadır. Bu zuhurlar özellikle Elmadağ, Güdül, Haymana, Kalecik ve Kızılcahamam ilçelerinde gözlenmektedir. Bu manganez cevherleşmelerinden bazıları Elmadağ ve Haymana ilçelerinde yer almakta olup, Elmadağ-Kılıçlar manganez zuhurunda % 47-48 Mn tenörlü 60.000 ton mümkün, Haymana-Çayırlı sahasında ise % 19.45 Mn tenörlü 150.000 ton mümkün rezerv belirlenmiştir. Çayırlı sahasından geçmişte bir miktar üretim yapılmıştır. Bunlar dışında Kalecik ilçesinde Boyamlı sahasında da % 12 Mn tenörlü 2000 ton görünür manganez rezervi vardır. Bala-Kesikköprü demir yatağı birkaç demir yatak ve zuhurundan oluşmaktadır. Bu yatakların % Fe içerikleri 39 ile 61, % SiO2 içerikleri 5 ile 16 ve % S içerikleri ise 0.58 ile 1.80 arasında değişmektedir ve farklı tenör içeriklerine göre yataklardaki toplam potansiyel yaklaşık 13 milyon ton olarak belirlenmiştir. Yapılan üretimler sonucunda, yaklaşık 1 milyon ton civarında işletilebilir demir rezervin kaldığı belirtilmektedir. Ocakların bazıları geçmiş yıllarda işletilmiştir, ancak tenörlerin düşük olması ve kükürt ile SiO2 içermeleri nedeniyle bazı yataklar işletilememektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Situation in Turkish Kurdistan, November 1992
    INSTITUT URD DE PARIS THE SITUATION IN TURKISH KURDISTAN Information and liaison bulletin I SPECIAL ISSUE I NOVEMBER 1992 This bulletin is issued in French. German.EnqIish. Kurdish. Spanish and TurRish. Price per issue: France: 30 FF - Elsewhere: 35 FF Annual subscribtion (12 issues) France: 300 FF - Elsewhere: 350 FF Monthly review Directeur de la publication: Mohamad HASSAN num~ro de la Commission Paritaire : 659 15 AS. ISSN 0761 1285 INSTITUT KURD!:. 106. rue La Fayette - 75010 PARIS Tel. : (I) 48 24 64 64 - Fax: 477099 04 The tragic fight of the Kurduh people, which has lasted for such a long time, has its origins in the principle right of everypopulation toauto-determination. Thu u why it is a righteous fight. I call open all governments, organizations and citizens ofall countries as well as the international organizations to become aware ; in their relations with the countries where Kurds live, they should become aware of the realpolitics conducted by the leaders of these countries and their politics concerning the Kurds. No manifestation of cruelty, no national or social injustice, no impinging on human rights and no genocide should go unnoticed. Neither should it remain without consequence for those countries allowing these actions. Andrei Sakharov Excerpt from Mr. A. Sakharov's message at the International Conference in Paris: "The Kurds: Human Rights and Cultural Identity, " ,. October 14-15,1989. THE SITUATION IN TURKISH KURDISTAN • From repression to "total war" • A few basic facts • The destruction and evacuation of Kurdish cities and villages • Assassinations of Kurdish civilians • Censorship • Turkish points of view • Western testimony FROM REPRESSION TO "TOTAL WAR" toll established by of banned and the Turkish daily Since the military caup of confiscated books).
    [Show full text]
  • EU-Turkey Relations and the Stagnation of Turkish Democracy
    EU-Turkey Relations and the Stagnation of Turkish Democracy Senem Aydın-Düzgit and E. Fuat Keyman Istanbul Bilgi University and Sabanci University WORKING PAPER 02 EU-Turkey Relations and the Stagnation of Turkish Democracy Senem Aydın-Düzgit and E. Fuat Keyman* Turkey EU Accession Process Democracy Deficit Abstract Introduction The current stagnation of Turkish democracy goes hand in hand with the current impasse in EU-Turkey relations. A combination of domestic Back in August 2004, we published a working paper on the role of factors with a loss of credibility of EU conditionality led to a situation Turkey’s relations with the EU in transforming Turkish democracy in which political reform is substantially stalled and in cases where it as part of a larger project on EU-Turkey relations conducted by the is realised, it is mostly conducted to serve the interests of the ruling Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) and the Economics and political elite and with no real reference to the EU. The virtuous cycle of Foreign Policy Forum (Aydın and Keyman 2004). The central argument reform that characterised the 1999-2005 period has been replaced by of the paper was that the strengthening credibility of EU conditionality a vicious cycle in which lack of effective conditionality feeds into po- towards Turkey, coupled with favourable domestic and international litical stagnation which in turn moves Turkey and the EU further away dynamics resulted in substantial reforms towards the consolidation from one another. of Turkish democracy. The paper, written prior to the EU’s decision to open accession negotiations with Turkey, concluded that the opening of accession talks with the country on the basis of a fair decision that rests on Turkey’s achievements in its modernity and democracy would constitute a crucial step in remedying the remaining problematic aspects of Turkish democracy.
    [Show full text]