DB Mobility Logistics 2010 Annual Report at a Glance
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Arriva Guildford & West Surrey 02536462
DOCUMENT TYPES (B) TO (L) (CONT'D) ARRIVA GUILDFORD & WEST SURREY 02536462 (C2) 30/09/2015 ARROW FISHERIES LTD 05984538 (D1) 30/09/2015 LIMITED ARROW GARAGE LIMITED 06029245 (D1) 30/09/2015 ARRIVA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 01737852 (D1) 01/10/2015 ARROW GLOBAL LIMITED 05606545 (D1) 01/10/2015 ARRIVA INTERNATIONAL FINANCE LIMITED 05349251 (D1) 01/10/2015 ARROW GLOBAL ACCOUNTS MANAGEMENT 05478076 (D1) 01/10/2015 ARRIVA INTERNATIONAL (7) LIMITED 04337700 (D1) 01/10/2015 LIMITED ARRIVA INTERNATIONAL TRAINS 04337646 (D1) 01/10/2015 ARROW GLOBAL (HOLDINGS) LIMITED 05606576 (D1) 01/10/2015 (LEASING) LIMITED ARROW GLOBAL INVESTMENTS (UK) 07411473 (D1) 05/10/2015 ARRIVA INTERNATIONAL (2) LIMITED 04337648 (D1) 01/10/2015 LIMITED ARRIVA KENT & SURREY LIMITED 00114841 (C2) 30/09/2015 ARROW GLOBAL INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS 06568603 (D1) 01/10/2015 ARRIVA KENT & SURREY LIMITED 00114841 (D1) 01/10/2015 LIMITED ARRIVA KENT & SURREY LIMITED 00114841 (C2) 05/10/2015 ARROW GLOBAL LEGH LIMITED 08612068 (D1) 01/10/2015 ARRIVA KENT THAMESIDE LIMITED 02005266 (C2) 05/10/2015 ARROW GLOBAL LUNA LIMITED 08898157 (D1) 03/10/2015 ARRIVA KENT THAMESIDE LIMITED 02005266 (C2) 30/09/2015 ARROW GLOBAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED 07373491 (D1) 01/10/2015 ARRIVA KENT THAMESIDE LIMITED 02005266 (D1) 01/10/2015 ARROW GLOBAL MASSEY LIMITED 08612076 (D1) 01/10/2015 ARRIVA LIVERPOOL LIMITED 02208238 (C2) 02/10/2015 ARROW GLOBAL PORTUGAL LIMITED 07243769 (D1) 01/10/2015 ARRIVAL MARKETING LIMITED/HOYLAND 09633603 (B2) 03/10/2015 ARROW GLOBAL RECEIVABLES 05875306 (D1) 01/10/2015 INK LTD MANAGEMENT -
English Counties
ENGLISH COUNTIES See also the Links section for additional web sites for many areas UPDATED 23/09/21 Please email any comments regarding this page to: [email protected] TRAVELINE SITES FOR ENGLAND GB National Traveline: www.traveline.info More-detailed local options: Traveline for Greater London: www.tfl.gov.uk Traveline for the North East: https://websites.durham.gov.uk/traveline/traveline- plan-your-journey.html Traveline for the South West: www.travelinesw.com Traveline for the West & East Midlands: www.travelinemidlands.co.uk Black enquiry line numbers indicate a full timetable service; red numbers imply the facility is only for general information, including requesting timetables. Please note that all details shown regarding timetables, maps or other publicity, refer only to PRINTED material and not to any other publications that a county or council might be showing on its web site. ENGLAND BEDFORDSHIRE BEDFORD Borough Council No publications Public Transport Team, Transport Operations Borough Hall, Cauldwell Street, Bedford MK42 9AP Tel: 01234 228337 Fax: 01234 228720 Email: [email protected] www.bedford.gov.uk/transport_and_streets/public_transport.aspx COUNTY ENQUIRY LINE: 01234 228337 (0800-1730 M-Th; 0800-1700 FO) PRINCIPAL OPERATORS & ENQUIRY LINES: Grant Palmer (01525 719719); Stagecoach East (01234 220030); Uno (01707 255764) CENTRAL BEDFORDSHIRE Council No publications Public Transport, Priory House, Monks Walk Chicksands, Shefford SG17 5TQ Tel: 0300 3008078 Fax: 01234 228720 Email: [email protected] -
The Report from Passenger Transport Magazine
MAKinG TRAVEL SiMpLe apps Wide variations in journey planners quality of apps four stars Moovit For the first time, we have researched which apps are currently Combined rating: 4.5 (785k ratings) Operator: Moovit available to public transport users and how highly they are rated Developer: Moovit App Global LtD Why can’t using public which have been consistent table-toppers in CityMApper transport be as easy as Transport Focus’s National Rail Passenger Combined rating: 4.5 (78.6k ratings) ordering pizza? Speaking Survey, have not transferred their passion for Operator: Citymapper at an event in Glasgow customer service to their respective apps. Developer: Citymapper Limited earlier this year (PT208), First UK Bus was also among the 18 four-star robert jack Louise Coward, the acting rated bus operator apps, ahead of rivals Arriva trAinLine Managing Editor head of insight at passenger (which has different apps for information and Combined rating: 4.5 (69.4k ratings) watchdog Transport Focus, revealed research m-tickets) and Stagecoach. The 11 highest Operator: trainline which showed that young people want an rated bus operator apps were all developed Developer: trainline experience that is as easy to navigate as the one by Bournemouth-based Passenger, with provided by other retailers. Blackpool Transport, Warrington’s Own Buses, three stars She explained: “Young people challenged Borders Buses and Nottingham City Transport us with things like, ‘if I want to order a pizza all possessing apps with a 4.8-star rating - a trAveLine SW or I want to go and see a film, all I need to result that exceeds the 4.7-star rating achieved Combined rating: 3.4 (218 ratings) do is get my phone out go into an app’ .. -
Notices and Proceedings
OFFICE OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER (NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND) NOTICES AND PROCEEDINGS PUBLICATION NUMBER: 2158 PUBLICATION DATE: 20 September 2013 OBJECTION DEADLINE DATE: 11 October 2013 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (North East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Fax: 0113 249 8142 Website: www.gov.uk The public counter at the above office is open from 9.30am to 4pm Monday to Friday The next edition of Notices and Proceedings will be published on: 04/10/2013 Publication Price £3.50 (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: [email protected] NOTICES AND PROCEEDINGS General Notes Layout and presentation – Entries in each section (other than in section 5) are listed in alphabetical order. Each entry is prefaced by a reference number, which should be quoted in all correspondence or enquiries. Further notes precede sections where appropriate. Accuracy of publication – Details published of applications and requests reflect information provided by applicants. The Traffic Commissioner cannot be held responsible for applications that contain incorrect information. Our website includes details of all applications listed in this booklet. The website address is: www.gov.uk Copies of Notices and Proceedings can be inspected free of charge at the Office of the Traffic Commissioner in Leeds. -
Stagecoach Group out in Front for 10-Year Tram Contract Responsible for Operating Tram Services on the New Lines to Oldham, Rochdale, Droylsden and Chorlton
AquaBus New alliance Meet the Sightseeing ready to forged for megabus.com tours' bumper set sail rail bid A-Team launch The newspaper of Stagecoach Group Issue 66 Spring 07 By Steven Stewart tagecoach Group has been Sselected as the preferred bidder to operate and maintain the Manchester Metrolink tram Metrolink bid network. The announcement from Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive (GMPTE) will see Stagecoach Metrolink taking over the 37km system and the associated infrastructure. The contract will run for 10 years and is expected to begin within the next three months. right on track It will include managing a number of special projects sponsored by GMPTE to improve the trams and infrastructure to benefit passengers. Stagecoach Metrolink will also be Stagecoach Group out in front for 10-year tram contract responsible for operating tram services on the new lines to Oldham, Rochdale, Droylsden and Chorlton. Nearly 20 million passengers travel every year on the network, which generates an annual turnover of around £22million. ”We will build on our operational expertise to deliver a first-class service to passengers in Manchester.” Ian Dobbs Stagecoach already operates Supertram, a 29km tram system in Sheffield, incorpo- rating three routes in the city. Ian Dobbs, Chief Executive of Stagecoach Group’s Rail Division, said: “We are delighted to have been selected as preferred bidder to run Manchester’s Metrolink network, one of the UK’s premier light rail systems. “Stagecoach operates the tram system in Sheffield, where we are now carrying a record 13 million passengers a year, and we will build on our operational expertise to deliver a first-class service to passengers in Growing places: Plans are in place to tempt more people on to the tram in Manchester. -
Arriva UK Bus
Arriva UK Bus Arriva UK Bus operates services in London and the South East, the Midlands, Yorkshire, the North East, the North West and North Wales. Arriva offers a wide range of rural, urban and inter-urban bus services. Bus Arriva entered the regional bus market in 1996 after able to respond quickly to changing markets and the market outside London was deregulated and customer needs so that we continue to grow subsequently privatised during the 1980s. Operationally successfully and sustainably. Our wealth of experience our focus is firmly set, as always, on our passengers, and our employees’ skills underpin our ability to transport authority partners and other transport provide a wide range of relevant, market-shaping clients. We are constantly evolving to ensure we are transport solutions that people want and will use. UK Bus 5,650 vehicles Bus 16,100 employees Employees 993 bus routes Newcastle 74 bus depots Sunderland Leeds Manchester 307 million Liverpool km operated annually Bangor Leicester 709 million passenger journeys per year London Passenger journeys overall passenger 88% satisfaction score Key successes in UK – Launched Demand Responsive Travel (DRT) – Established new training academies in St Helens service with our innovative ArrivaClick in Kent and Derby to train and upskills our workforce – New energy efficient ‘clean and green’ depot for Rhyl, – For its work with the Tees Valley Bus Network opened in March 2017 following a £3m investment Improvements scheme, Arriva North East won – £21m investment in new eco-friendly buses for Partnership of the Year at the North of England Merseyside, including 51 hybrid, 12 electric and Transport awards in 2016. -
LTP Section 1.11 Feb06
Medway Local Transport Plan 2006-2011 Helping deliver Medway: a city of learning, culture, tourism, and high technology CONTENTS Section 1 An introduction to Medway Section 2 Transport in the wider context Section 3 Community Involvement Section 4 Medway’s six transport priorities Section 5 Assessment of issues Section 6 Medway’s eight transport objectives Section 7 Medway’s 24 transport targets Section 8 Medway’s action plan for transport Section 9 Working in partnership Section 10 Value for money Section 11 What Medway plans to do and when Appendix A Analysis of Medway’s provisional targets Appendix B LTP finance tables Appendix C Supporting Strategies Underlining denotes additional text compared to provisional plan 1-1 Section 1 AN INTRODUCTION TO MEDWAY 1.1 THE REGENERATION OF MEDWAY 1.1.1 We aim to be a city of learning, culture, tourism, and high technology at the heart of the Thames Gateway. We are already well in our way to reach our goal. There is much to do. 1.1.2 Regeneration is the top priority in Medway, the delivery of major development sites together with the rejuvenation of Chatham town centre are key during the life of this plan. Transport will make a significant contribution to the regeneration of Medway. For this reason the plan includes a local priority covering sustainable regeneration. The council’s vision: To make Medway a city of learning culture, tourism, and high technology. 1.1.3 The LTP will be delivered across eight key objectives, with supporting regeneration, improving travel safety, movement in Medway and improving accessibility being of the highest importance. -
Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE
ITEM 1 TRANSPORT COMMITTEE NEWS 07 MARCH 2000 This report may be of interest to: All Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE Accountable Officer: John Inman Author: Stephen Mortimer 1. Purpose 1.1 To advise the Committee of developments relating to Milton Keynes’ rail services. 2. Summary 2.1 West Coast Main Line Modernisation and Upgrade is now in the active planning stage. It will result in faster and more frequent train services between Milton Keynes Central and London, and between Milton Keynes Central and points north. Bletchley and Wolverton will also have improved services to London. 2.2 Funding for East-West Rail is now being sought from the Shadow Strategic Rail Authority (SSRA) for the western end of the line (Oxford-Bedford). Though the SSRA have permitted a bid only for a 60 m.p.h. single-track railway, excluding the Aylesbury branch and upgrade of the Marston Vale (Bedford-Bletchley) line, other Railtrack investment and possible developer contributions (yet to be investigated) may allow these elements to be included, as well as perhaps a 90 m.p.h. double- track railway. As this part of East-West Rail already exists, no form of planning permission is required; however, Transport and Works Act procedures are to be started to build the missing parts of the eastern end of the line. 2.3 New trains were introduced on the Marston Vale line, Autumn 1999. A study of the passenger accessibility of Marston Vale stations identified various desirable improvements, for which a contribution of £10,000 is required from this Council. -
Can Competition for and in the Market Co-Exist in Terms of Delivering Cost Efficient Services? Evidence from Open Access Train O
Transportation Research Part A 113 (2018) 114–124 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Transportation Research Part A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tra Can competition for and in the market co-exist in terms of delivering cost efficient services? Evidence from open access train T operators and their franchised counterparts in Britain ⁎ Phill Wheata, , Andrew S.J. Smitha, Torris Rasmussenb a Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, UK b Norwegian Railway Directorate, Norway ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: This paper aims to inform an important policy debate in Europe on how best to open up pas- Returns to density senger rail markets to increased competition: and specifically, whether to allow open access train Competition-in-the-market operators alongside franchised (tendered) operators. The paper utilises new British data to Competition-for-the-market analyse the cost side of this debate. Our data is unique in that we have cost data by route level for both the incumbent (corresponding to British franchises) and the open access operators, as op- posed to only having cost data on the incumbent at the network level as in other countries. The open access operators are found to have comparable unit costs to franchised operators. This is unexpected considering the significant returns to density that benefit the larger franchised op- erators. This is subsequently found to be due to lower input prices and an ‘open access business model’ effect that outweigh any density disadvantages. Overall we find that there are negligible cost disadvantages of allowing open access operators to compete with franchised intercity op- erators. -
Leeds Thesis Template
Understanding the Relationship Between Capacity Utilisation and Performance and the Implications for the Pricing of Congested Rail Networks John Alexander Haith Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Institute for Transport Studies February, 2015 - ii - The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own, except where work which has formed part of jointly-authored publications has been included. The contribution of the candidate and the other authors to this work has been explicitly indicated below. The candidate confirms that appropriate credit has been given within the thesis where reference has been made to the work of others. Elements of the work contained in this thesis have previously appeared in the published paper:- Haith, J., Johnson, D. and Nash, C. 2014.The Case for Space: the Measurement of Capacity Utilisation, its Relationship with Reactionary Delay and the Calculation of the Capacity Charge for the British Rail Network. Transportation Planning and Technology 37 (1) February 2014 Special Issue: Universities’ Transport Study Group UK Annual Conference 2013. Where there is specific use of the contents of the above paper in this thesis reference is made to it in the appropriate part of the text. However, general use of the work contained in the paper is particularly made in Chapter 5 (Methodology), Chapter 6 (The Data Set) and Chapter 7 (Results). It should also be noted that all research and analysis contained in this thesis (and the paper) was conducted by the candidate. Secondly, substantial additional analysis was conducted between the finalisation of the paper and the writing of this thesis meaning that the results of the research have expanded significantly. -
6. Tackling Congestion
6. Tackling Congestion Reducing the levels of congestion remains a fundamental objective in this Plan. This not only look at addressing congestion related problems currently being experienced in Southend but at managing expected traffic growth in the future. The latter is essential in ensuring future aspirations for the Borough are realised, especially plans for regeneration and intensification of the urban area. Southend already experiences significant delays on many sections of its key routes. Without intervention, overall traffic levels on local highway network during the morning peak hour are forecast to grow by over 20% by 2011 and 35% by 2016. As a result, peak hour traffic conditions will deteriorate significantly with journey times on strategic routes expected to increase by between 50% and 75% by 2011, and doubling by 2016. It is clear that the strategy for reducing congestion has synergies with the transport measures and policies identified to deliver other shared priorities, namely accessibility, safer roads, better air quality and quality of life. Improvement in terms of accessibility and safety will make alternatives to the car more attractive, and similarly reducing traffic levels and congestion will likely reduce numbers of accidents and impacts on air quality. An Overview to Achieving the Shared Priority The LTP strategy will help deliver improved and more reliable journey times for all road users and seek to redress the balance of the transport system by making non-car modes a far more attractive alternative to the car for many trips. The strategy is based on managing the existing network, as well as reinforcing and strengthening measures and policies aimed at influencing people’s travel behaviour and ultimately promoting sensible travel choices. -
5Th Status Report About the Implementation Progress of the TAP TSI
Report 5th TAP TSI Implementation progress report - ERA-REP-152 IMPL-2019-03 V 1.0 Making the railway system work better for society. Report 5th status report about the implementation progress of the TAP TSI Drafted by Validated by Approved by Stefan JUGELT Name Felice FERRARI Pio GUIDO Kresimir RAGUZ Position Project Officers Head of Unit Head of Department Date 15/01/2020 02/04/2020 03/04/2020 Signed Signed Signed Document History Version Date Comments 1st draft for the presentation at the TAP TSI 0.1 26/03/2019 cooperation group 0.2 15/05/2019 Inclusion of comments from NCPs 1.0 15/01/2020 Final version 120 Rue Marc Lefrancq | BP 20392 | FR-59307 Valenciennes Cedex 1 / 95 Tel. +33 (0)327 09 65 00 | era.europa.eu Any printed copy is uncontrolled. The version in force is available on Agency’s intranet/extranet. Report 5th TAP TSI Implementation progress report - ERA-REP-152 IMPL-2019-03 V 1.0 Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Reference documents ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Reference legislation .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 6 2 Introduction