SKEPTICISM Also Available from Bloomsbury

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SKEPTICISM Also Available from Bloomsbury SKEPTICISM Also available from Bloomsbury The Bloomsbury Companion to Analytic Philosophy, edited by Barry Dainton and Howard Robinson The Bloomsbury Companion to Epistemology, edited by Andrew Cullison A Critical Introduction to Skepticism, Allan Hazlett SKEPTICISM FROM ANTIQUITY TO THE PRESENT Edited by Diego E. Machuca and Baron Reed Bloomsbury Academic An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc LONDON • OXFORD • NEW YORK • NEW DELHI • SYDNEY Bloomsbury Academic An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2018 © Diego Machuca and Baron Reed, 2018 Diego Machuca and Baron Reed have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the Editors of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the editors. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: HB: 978-1-4725-0771-6 ePDF: 978-1-4725-1436-3 ePub: 978-1-4725-1149-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Machuca, Diego E., editor. Title: Skepticism: from antiquity to the present / [edited by] Diego Machuca and Baron Reed. Description: New York : Bloomsbury, 2018. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017030623 (print) | LCCN 2017043043 (ebook) | ISBN 9781472511492 (ePub) | ISBN 9781472514363 (ePDF) | ISBN 9781472507716 (hardback) Subjects: LCSH: Skepticism–History. Classification: LCC B837 (ebook) | LCC B837 .S53 2018 (print) | DDC 149/.7309–dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017030623 Cover design: Clare Turner Cover image © Bridgeman Images Typeset by Deanta Global Publishing Services, Chennai, India CONTENTS LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS IX LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XI General Introduction xiii Baron Reed and Diego E. Machuca Part I: Ancient Skepticism 1 Introduction Diego E. Machuca 3 1 The Cyrenaics and Skepticism 14 Richard Bett 2 Pyrrho and Timon 24 Casey Perin 3 Arcesilaus 36 Anna Maria Ioppolo 4 Carneades 51 Harald Thorsrud 5 Aenesidemus 67 Luca Castagnoli 6 Philo of Larissa 81 Harold Tarrant 7 Cicero 93 J. P. F. Wynne 8 Menodotus and Medical Empiricism 102 James Allen 9 Middle Platonism and Skepticism: Plutarch and Favorinus 114 Carlos Lévy vi CONTENTS 10 Sextus Empiricus 125 Tad Brennan and Cliff Roberts 11 Skepticism in Classical Indian Philosophy 145 Matthew R. Dasti Part II: Medieval and Renaissance Skepticism 163 Introduction Diego E. Machuca 165 12 Augustine and Skepticism 175 Stéphane Marchand 13 John of Salisbury’s Skepticism 186 David Bloch 14 Skepticism in Classical Islam: The Case of Ghazali 196 Paul L. Heck 15 Nicholas of Autrecourt and John Buridan on Skepticism 209 Christophe Grellard 16 Divine Deception 222 Henrik Lagerlund 17 Michel de Montaigne 232 Gianni Paganini 18 Pierre Charron 247 Gianni Paganini 19 Francisco Sanchez: A Renaissance Pyrrhonist against Aristotelian Dogmatism 260 Damian Caluori Part III: Modern Skepticism 271 Introduction Baron Reed 273 20 François de La Mothe Le Vayer 283 Sylvia Giocanti 21 Gassendi on Skepticism 295 Antonia LoLordo 22 Descartes and the Force of Skepticism 306 David Cunning CONTENTS vii 23 Varieties of Modern Academic Skepticism: Pierre-Daniel Huet and Simon Foucher 320 Michael W. Hickson 24 Spinoza on Skepticism 342 Alison Peterman 25 Pierre Bayle 355 John Christian Laursen 26 Berkeley and Skepticism 369 Margaret Atherton 27 A Pyrrhonian Interpretation of Hume on Assent 380 Donald L. M. Baxter 28 Thomas Reid’s Engagement with Skeptics and Skepticism 395 René van Woudenberg 29 Johann Georg Hamann 407 Gwen Griffith-Dickson 30 Kant and External World Skepticism 419 Georges Dicker 31 Hegel: Philosophy as a Kind of Skepticism 430 Dietmar H. Heidemann 32 Friedrich Nietzsche 442 Andreas Urs Sommer 33 Russell’s Logical Construction of the External World 454 Peter J. Graham 34 Moore and Mooreanism 467 Annalisa Coliva 35 Wittgenstein and Skepticism: Illusory Doubts 481 Michael Williams 36 Richard Popkin on the History of Skepticism 506 José R. Maia Neto Part IV: Contemporary Skepticism 521 Introduction Baron Reed 523 viii CONTENTS 37 Regress Arguments and Skepticism 535 Richard Fumerton 38 The Problem of the Criterion 550 Andrew D. Cling 39 Neo-Pyrrhonism 565 Markus Lammenranta 40 Disagreement and Skepticism 581 Bryan Frances 41 Skepticism and the Internalism-Externalism Debate 592 Matthias Steup 42 Skepticism and Fallibilism 609 Stephen Hetherington 43 Skepticism and Contextualism 620 Michael Blome-Tillmann 44 External World Skepticism 634 Ram Neta 45 Disjunctivism and Skepticism 652 Duncan Pritchard and Chris Ranalli 46 Inductive Skepticism: A Functional Investigation 668 Ruth Weintraub 47 Skepticism about A Priori Knowledge 685 Otávio Bueno 48 Skepticism about Other Minds 700 Anil Gomes 49 Moral Skepticism 714 Richard Joyce 50 Religious Skepticism 727 J. L. Schellenberg NAME INDEX 739 SUBJECT INDEX 742 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS James Allen, University of Toronto, Canada Margaret Atherton, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, United States Donald L. M. Baxter, University of Connecticut, United States Richard Bett, Johns Hopkins University, United States David Bloch, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Michael Blome-Tillmann, McGill University, Canada Tad Brennan, Cornell University, United States Otávio Bueno, University of Miami, United States Damian Caluori, Trinity University, United States Luca Castagnoli, University of Oxford, United Kingdom Andrew Cling, University of Alabama in Huntsville, United States Annalisa Coliva, University of California, Irvine, United States David Cunning, University of Iowa, United States Matthew Dasti, Bridgewater State University, United States Georges Dicker, SUNY College at Brockport, United States Bryan Frances, University of Tartu, Estonia Richard Fumerton, University of Iowa, United States Sylvia Giocanti, Université de Toulouse Le Mirail, France Anil Gomes, University of Oxford, United Kingdom Peter Graham, University of California, Riverside, United States Christophe Grellard, EPHE, PSL Research University, France Gwen Griffith-Dickson, King’s College London, United Kingdom Paul Heck, Georgetown University, United States Stephen Hetherington, University of New South Wales, Australia Dietmar Heidemann, Université du Luxembourg, Luxembourg Michael Hickson, Trent University, Canada Anna Maria Ioppolo, Sapienza - Università di Roma, Italy Richard Joyce, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand Henrik Lagerlund, Stockholm University, Sweden x LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS Markus Lammenranta, University of Helsinki, Finland John Christian Laursen, University of California, Riverside, United States Carlos Lévy, Université Paris-Sorbonne, France Antonia LoLordo, University of Virginia, United States Diego E. Machuca, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina José Raimundo Maia Neto, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil Stéphane Marchand, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, France Ram Neta, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States Gianni Paganini, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Italy Casey Perin, University of California, Irvine, United States Alison Peterman, University of Rochester, United States Duncan Pritchard, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom Baron Reed, Northwestern University, United States Cliff Roberts, University of Victoria, Canada J. L. Schellenberg, Mount Saint Vincent University, Canada Matthias Steup, University of Colorado Boulder, United States Harold Tarrant, The University of Newcastle, Australia Harald Thorsrud, Agnes Scott College, United States Andreas Urs Sommer, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany Ruth Weintraub, Tel Aviv University, Israel Michael Williams, Johns Hopkins University, United States René van Woudenberg, VU University, The Netherlands J. P. F. Wynne, Northwestern University, United States LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 3D Berkeley, Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous Acad. Cicero, Academica Ad Att. Cicero, Epistulae ad Atticum Adv. Col. Plutarch, Adversus Colotem AM Sextus Empiricus, Adversus Mathematicos Apol. Plato, Apology of Socrates AT Œuvres de Descartes, 11 vols., edited by C. Adam & P. Tannery. Paris: Vrin, 1996. Bibl. Photius, Bibliotheca C. Acad. Augustine, Contra Academicos Chronic. Can. Eusebius, Chronicus Canon Conf. Augustine, Confessiones CSM The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vols. 1 & 2, edited by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984/5. CSMK The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 3, edited by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch, and A. Kenny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. De Alex. fort. Plutarch, De Alexandri Magni Fortuna Comp. med. gen. Galen, De compositione medicamentorum per genera De E Plutarch, De E apud Delphos De Or. Cicero, De Oratore De Prim. Frig. Plutarch, De Primo Frigido De rep. Cicero, De re publica De sect. ingred. Galen, De sectis ingredientibus De ut. cred. Augustine, De utilitate credendi Div. Cicero,
Recommended publications
  • Mind and World: Beyond the Externalism/Internalism Debate
    Research Proposal Mind and World: Beyond the Externalism/Internalism Debate Sanjit Chakraborty Research Scholar Department of Philosophy Jadavpur University Background For the last few years the concept of the natural kind terms has haunted me. My main concern has been regarding the location of the meaning of these terms. Are meanings of the natural kind terms in the head or in the world? This question has been the most pressing in Philosophy of Mind and Philosophy of Language. I have realized that we cannot separate mind from the world. I had in the beginning only a layman‟s conception regarding mind, meaning and the world. When I entered the field of philosophy inspired by Hilary Putnam, I found that semantic externalism is a vexing issue involving a vast area. The location of content is at the core of the metaphysical debate regarding internalism and externalism in the sense that internalists believe that mental proprieties are intrinsic only if they preserve across world identity of internal replicas. Externalism is opposed to this thinking. For externalists, mental properties are in many cases dependent on physical or social environment. The linguistic strategy also maintains a difference between internalism and externalism regarding the mental content. Descriptivism focuses on general terms that consist in descriptive content and leads to mode of presentation of reference through sense. Besides, the causal theory of reference refutes descriptivism to ensure that there is a causal chain of reference between words and 1 objects that help us to identify agent‟s thought through an identification of its relation with external environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Skepticism and Pluralism Ways of Living a Life Of
    SKEPTICISM AND PLURALISM WAYS OF LIVING A LIFE OF AWARENESS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ZHUANGZI #±r A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHILOSOPHY AUGUST 2004 By John Trowbridge Dissertation Committee: Roger T. Ames, Chairperson Tamara Albertini Chung-ying Cheng James E. Tiles David R. McCraw © Copyright 2004 by John Trowbridge iii Dedicated to my wife, Jill iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In completing this research, I would like to express my appreciation first and foremost to my wife, Jill, and our three children, James, Holly, and Henry for their support during this process. I would also like to express my gratitude to my entire dissertation committee for their insight and understanding ofthe topics at hand. Studying under Roger Ames has been a transformative experience. In particular, his commitment to taking the Chinese tradition on its own terms and avoiding the tendency among Western interpreters to overwrite traditional Chinese thought with the preoccupations ofWestern philosophy has enabled me to broaden my conception ofphilosophy itself. Roger's seminars on Confucianism and Daoism, and especially a seminar on writing a philosophical translation ofthe Zhongyong r:pJm (Achieving Equilibrium in the Everyday), have greatly influenced my own initial attempts to translate and interpret the seminal philosophical texts ofancient China. Tamara Albertini's expertise in ancient Greek philosophy was indispensable to this project, and a seminar I audited with her, comparing early Greek and ancient Chinese philosophy, was part ofthe inspiration for my choice ofresearch topic. I particularly valued the opportunity to study Daoism and the Yijing ~*~ with Chung-ying Cheng g\Gr:p~ and benefited greatly from his theory ofonto-cosmology as a means of understanding classical Chinese philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conversion of Skepticism in Augustine's Against the Academics the Conversion of Skepticism in Augustine"S Against the Academics
    THE CONVERSION OF SKEPTICISM IN AUGUSTINE'S AGAINST THE ACADEMICS THE CONVERSION OF SKEPTICISM IN AUGUSTINE"S AGAINST THE ACADEMICS BY BERNARD NEWMAN WILLS, B.A., M.A. A THESIS Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor ofPhilosophy McMaster University C Copyright by Bernard Newman Wills DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2003) McMaster University (Religious Studies) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The Conversion of Skepticism in Augustine's Against the Academics AUTHOR: Bernard Newman Wills, B.A., M.A. SUPERVISOR: Dr. P. Travis Kroeker NUMBER OF PAGES: v, 322 ABSTRACT This thesis examines Augustine's relation to Academic Skepticism through a detailed commentary on the dialogue Against the Academics. In it is demonstrated the significance of epistemological themes for Augustine and their inseparability from practical and religious concerns. It is also shown how these issues unfold within the logic ofAugustine's trinitarianism, which informs the argument even ofhis earliest works. This, in turn, demonstrates the depth of the young Augustine's engagement with Christian categories in works often thought to be determined wholly, or almost wholly, by the logic of Plotinian Neo-Platonism. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Travis Kroeker for his advice and considerable patience: my readers Dr. Peter Widdicome and Dr. Zdravko Planinc: Dr. David Peddle for several useful suggestions and general encouragement: Dr. Dennis House for teaching me the art of reading dialogues: Mr. Danny Howlett for his editorial assistance: Grad Students and Colleagues at Memorial University of Newfoundland and, in a category all their own, my longsuffering wife Jean and three boisterous children Kristin, Jeremy and Thomas.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel's Critique of Ancient Skepticism
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy Summer 8-1-2012 Hegel's Critique of Ancient Skepticism John Wood Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses Recommended Citation Wood, John, "Hegel's Critique of Ancient Skepticism." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2012. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/113 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HEGEL’S CRITIQUE OF ANCIENT SKEPTICISM by JAY WOOD Under the Direction of Dr. Sebastian Rand ABSTRACT Recent work on the philosophy of G.W.F. Hegel has emphasized his interest in skeptical concerns. These contemporary scholars argue that, despite common opinions to the contrary, Hegel actually had a very keen interest in skepticism, one that informed and motivated much of his overall project. While I welcome this recent literature, I argue here that contemporary scholars have overemphasized the importance of skepticism for Hegel. By looking closely at Hegel’s arguments against skepticism in the Phenomenology of Spirit, I argue that Hegel’s anti-skeptical arguments are in fact major failures. Hegel’s failure is at odds with the emphasis that contemporary literature places on Hegel’s interests in skepticism. For a philosopher who was supposedly centrally concerned with skeptical issues, Hegel sure does not act like it. I conclude that the tension here is the result of contemporary scholars’ overemphasis of the role that skepticism plays in Hegel’s project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of the Criterion
    Chapter 5 The Problem of the Criterion i "The problem of the criterion" seems to me to be one of the most important and one of the most difficult of all the problems of phi- losophy. I am tempted to say that one has not begun to philosophize until one has faced this problem and has recognized how unappealing, in the end, each of the possible solutions is. I have chosen this problem as my topic for the Aquinas Lecture because what first set me to thinking about it (and I remain obsessed by it) were two treatises of twentieth century scholastic philosophy. I refer first to P. Coffey's two-volume work, Epistemology or the Theory of Knowledge, pub- lished in 1917.1 This led me in turn to the treatises of Coffey's great teacher, Cardinal D. J. Merrier: Criteriologie generale ou theorie gen- erate de la certitude.2 Mercier and, following him, Coffey set the problem correctly, I think, and have seen what is necessary for its solution. But I shall not discuss their views in detail. I shall formulate the problem; then note what, according to Mercier, is necessary if we are to solve the prob- lem; then sketch my own solution; and, finally, note the limitations of my approach to the problem. What is the problem, then? It is the ancient problem of "the dial- lelus"—the problem of "the wheel" or "the vicious circle." It was 61 62 • PROBLEM OF THE CRITERION put very neatly by Montaigne in his Essays. So let us being by para- paraphrasing his formulation of the puzzle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liar Paradox As a Reductio Ad Absurdum Argument
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 3 May 15th, 9:00 AM - May 17th, 5:00 PM The Liar Paradox as a reductio ad absurdum argument Menashe Schwed Ashkelon Academic College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive Part of the Philosophy Commons Schwed, Menashe, "The Liar Paradox as a reductio ad absurdum argument" (1999). OSSA Conference Archive. 48. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA3/papersandcommentaries/48 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences and Conference Proceedings at Scholarship at UWindsor. It has been accepted for inclusion in OSSA Conference Archive by an authorized conference organizer of Scholarship at UWindsor. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Title: The Liar Paradox as a Reductio ad Absurdum Author: Menashe Schwed Response to this paper by: Lawrence Powers (c)2000 Menashe Schwed 1. Introduction The paper discusses two seemingly separated topics: the origin and function of the Liar Paradox in ancient Greek philosophy and the Reduction ad absurdum mode of argumentation. Its goal is to show how the two topics fit together and why they are closely connected. The accepted tradition is that Eubulides of Miletos was the first to formulate the Liar Paradox correctly and that the paradox was part of the philosophical discussion of the Megarian School. Which version of the paradox was formulated by Eubulides is unknown, but according to some hints given by Aristotle and an incorrect version given by Cicero1, the version was probably as follows: The paradox is created from the Liar sentence ‘I am lying’.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:01 PM
    Philosophy Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:01 PM Western Pre-Socratics Fanon Heraclitus- Greek 535-475 Bayle Panta rhei Marshall Mcluhan • "Everything flows" Roman Jakobson • "No man ever steps in the same river twice" Saussure • Doctrine of flux Butler Logos Harris • "Reason" or "Argument" • "All entities come to be in accordance with the Logos" Dike eris • "Strife is justice" • Oppositional process of dissolving and generating known as strife "The Obscure" and "The Weeping Philosopher" "The path up and down are one and the same" • Theory about unity of opposites • Bow and lyre Native of Ephesus "Follow the common" "Character is fate" "Lighting steers the universe" Neitzshce said he was "eternally right" for "declaring that Being was an empty illusion" and embracing "becoming" Subject of Heideggar and Eugen Fink's lecture Fire was the origin of everything Influenced the Stoics Protagoras- Greek 490-420 BCE Most influential of the Sophists • Derided by Plato and Socrates for being mere rhetoricians "Man is the measure of all things" • Found many things to be unknowable • What is true for one person is not for another Could "make the worse case better" • Focused on persuasiveness of an argument Names a Socratic dialogue about whether virtue can be taught Pythagoras of Samos- Greek 570-495 BCE Metempsychosis • "Transmigration of souls" • Every soul is immortal and upon death enters a new body Pythagorean Theorem Pythagorean Tuning • System of musical tuning where frequency rations are on intervals based on ration 3:2 • "Pure" perfect fifth • Inspired
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Chuang Tzu Free
    FREE THE BOOK OF CHUANG TZU PDF Chuang Tzu,Zhuangzi,Martin Palmer | 352 pages | 01 Dec 2007 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780140455373 | English | London, United Kingdom Zhuangzi (book) - Wikipedia READ as many books as you like Personal use. One of the great founders of Taoism, Chaung Tzu lived in the fourth century BC and is among the most enjoyable and intriguing personalities in the whole of Chinese philosophy. The Way of Chuang Tzu Book Summary : Chuang Tzuu considered, along with Lao Tzu, one of the great figures of early Taoist thoughtu used parables and anecdotes, allegory and paradox, to illustrate that real happiness and freedom are found only in understanding the Tao or Way of nature, and The Book of Chuang Tzu in its unity. The respected Trappist monk Thomas Merton spent several years reading and reflecting upon four different translations of the Chinese classic that bears Chuang Tzu's name. The result is this collection of poetic renderings of the great sage's work that conveys its spirit in a way no other translation has and that was Merton's personal favorite among his more than The Book of Chuang Tzu books. Both prose and verse are included here, as well as a short section from Merton discussing the most salient themes of Chuang Tzu's teachings. The Inner Chapters are the only sustained section of this text widely believed to be the work of Chuang Tzu himself, dating to the fourth century B. Witty and engaging, spiced with the lyricism of poetry, Chuang Tzu's Taoist insights are timely and eternal, profoundly concerned with spiritual ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Title on the Rejection of Reason by the Early Empiricist Author(S
    Title On the Rejection of Reason by the Early Empiricist Author(s) Nishimura, Seishu Citation 京都大学文学部哲学研究室紀要 (2005), 8: 160-170 Issue Date 2005-12-10 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/24239 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University On the Rejection of Reason by the Early Empiricist Seishu Nishimura In his “On the Sects for Beginners,” Galen describes a debate between two primary sects of medicine in antiquity: the empiricist and the rationalist. According to Galen, “medicine is the science of what is healthy and what is unhealthy,” by virtue of which the doctor can prescribe the remedy (SB, 1).1 In this sense, medical knowledge is essentially practical. But the empiricist and the rationalist disagree over the origin of such knowledge. The former claims that “experience alone” is sufficient in order to obtain it (ibid). We will call this the empiricist claim. Roughly speaking, by “experience,” the empiricist means perception and memory. There are three types of experience by which we can acquire medical knowledge: (i) “autopsia,” i.e., one’s own perception, (ii) “history,” i.e., one’s knowledge of the experiences of others, and (iii) “the transition to the similar” (SB, 3).2 Here, (ii) and (iii) supplement (i) because firsthand experience is a limited capacity. The core of the empiricist claim is that, given the experience gained in these ways, we don’t need any other things for medical knowledge. For the empiricist, X is medical knowledge if X is obtained from and confirmed by experience. On the contrary, the rationalist insists that, in addition to experience, the use of “reason” is necessary for medical knowledge (SB, 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Volume 31, Winter 2006
    LIVING IN DOUBT: CARNEADES’ PITHANON RECONSIDERED SUZANNE OBDRZALEK I though the interpretation of ancient texts is inevitably di¶cult, Carneades presents what one might call a worst-case scenario. In the first place, he wrote nothing. To complicate matters, Carneades’ views were so obscure that his faithful disciple Clitomachus con- fessed that he could never figure out what Carneades actually be- lieved (Cic. Acad. 2. 139). Showing remarkable fortitude in the face of such an obstacle, Clitomachus, attempting to play Plato to Carneades’ Socrates, reportedly recorded Carneades’ teachings in 400 books (D.L. 4. 67). Not one remains. None the less, Clito- machus’ attempt to make a philosophy of Carneades’ anti-theoreti- cal stance was not a complete failure; Carneades had a tremendous influence on the later Academy as well as the Stoa, and his views (or lack thereof) have been handed down to us by both Sextus Em- piricus and Cicero. These sources are, however, problematic. As a Pyrrhonist, Sextus was critical of the Academy and may have ex- aggerated what he took to be Carneades’ dogmatism. Cicero, on the other hand, a student of Philo, was undoubtedly influenced in his interpretation of Carneades by his teacher’s dogmatic scepti- cism. Carneades is perhaps best known for proposing the pithan»e phantasia (probable impression) as a criterion for life. However, the status of his theory of the pithanon (probable) is completely unclear.1 Was it merely a dialectical move against the Stoic charge of apraxia (inaction)? Was it a theory that Carneades himself en- ã Suzanne Obdrzalek 2006 I would like to thank Alan Code, Tony Long, Julius Moravcsik, and David Sedley for their comments on this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Putnam on Bivs and Radical Scepticism'
    For Putnam on Brains in Vats, (ed.) S. Goldberg, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). ‘PUTNAM ON BIVS AND RADICAL SCEPTICISM’ DUNCAN PRITCHARD & CHRIS RANALLI University of Edinburgh & National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) ABSTRACT. The aim of this paper is to explore Putnam’s influential ‘BIV’ argument against radical scepticism, both as he presents this argument and as it has subsequently been reconstructed. §1 explores the BIV argument as Putnam presents it and the anti-sceptical morals that he extracts from this argument. §2 examines a core critique of the argument, so conceived, from Anthony Brueckner. §3 then critically evaluates an influential reconstruction of Putnam’s argument, due to Crispin Wright. §4-5 explores the idea that Putnam’s argument is best thought of as a transcendental response to radical scepticism, and accordingly applies Stroud’s challenge to transcendental arguments to this proposal. Finally, §6 examines an influential criticism of Putnam’s argument which is due to Nagel. 1. PUTNAM’S BIV ARGUMENT A familiar way of arguing for radical scepticism is by appeal to radical sceptical hypotheses, such as the hypothesis that one might be a brain-in-vat (BIV) which is being radically, and undetectably, deceived about its environment. Roughly, the sceptical argument goes that since such sceptical hypotheses are by their nature indistinguishable from normal experience, so one cannot know that they are false. Furthermore, if one cannot know that they are false, then it follows that one can’t know much of what one believes, most of which is inconsistent with radical sceptical hypotheses. This last step will almost certainly require some sort of closure-style principle, whereby knowledge is closed under known entailments.
    [Show full text]
  • Against the Logicians Edited by Richard Bett Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521531950 - Sextus Empiricus: Against the Logicians Edited by Richard Bett Frontmatter More information CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY SEXTUS EMPIRICUS Against the Logicians © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521531950 - Sextus Empiricus: Against the Logicians Edited by Richard Bett Frontmatter More information CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY Series editors KARL AMERIKS Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame DESMOND M. CLARKE Professor of Philosophy at University College Cork The main objective of Cambridge Textsin the History of Philosophy is to expand the range, variety and quality of texts in the history of philosophy which are available in English. The series includes texts by familiar names (such as Descartes and Kant) and also by less well-known authors. Wherever possible, texts are published in complete and unabridged form, and translations are specially commissioned for the series. Each volume contains a critical introduction together with a guide to further reading and any necessary glossaries and textual apparatus. The volumes are designed for student use at undergraduate and postgraduate level and will be of interest not only to students of philosophy, but also to a wider audience of readers in the history of science, the history of theology and the history of ideas. For a list of titles published in the series, please see end of book. © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521531950
    [Show full text]