DOCSLIB.ORG

165 Flint River Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Flint River Assessment Saginaw Bay to Tittabawassee River Saginaw River N Shiawassee River Cass River 0 10 MILES Fosters North Branch Montrose Columbiaville Otisville Clio Flushing New Lothrop Lapeer Flint Davison Grand Blanc Thornville Figure 1.–Flint River watershed drainage. 165 Flint River Assessment Upper South Branch Middle Flint 1. Horseshoe Lake 42. Mud Creek 2. South Branch 43. Cole Creek 3. Whigville Creek 44. Brent Creek 4. Winns Pond 45. Brent Run Creek Middle South Branch Lower Flint 5. Pine Creek 46. Pine Run Creek 6. Hunters Creek 47. Runnels Drain 7. Mill Creek 48. Silver Creek 8. Lapeer Lake 49. Misteguay Creek 9. South Branch Farmers Creek 10. Farmers Creek 11. Plum Creek Lower South Branch 12. Elm Creek 13. Cedar Creek 14. Bottom Creek 15. Bottom Creek Impoundment 16. Gravel Creek 17. Indian Creek 18. Fostoria Drain 19. Squaw Creek 20. Crystal Creek 21. North Branch Upper Flint 22. Henry Drain 23. Holloway Reservoir 24. Hasler Creek 25. Powers-Cullen Drain 26. Butternut Creek 27. C. S. Mott Lake 28. Lake Louise 29. Kearsley Creek 30. Duck Creek 31. Goodrich Mill Pond 32. Atlas Mill Pond 33. Black Creek 34. Kearsley Reservoir 35. Hamilton Impoundment 36. Gilkey Creek 37. Thread Creek 38. Thread Lake 39. Swartz Creek 40. West Branch Swartz Creek 41. Kimball Drain Figure 2.–Major tributaries and landmarks in the Flint River watershed. 166 Flint River Assessment Saginaw River Tittabawassee River N Shiawassee River Cass River 0 10 MILES Fosters 17 19 North Branch 18 48 49 46 21 Montrose 15 20 12 47 16 45 26 Columbiaville 14 13 Otisville 23 Clio 27 22 44 11 Flushing 25 New Lothrop 34 35 Lapeer Davison 24 43 Flint 42 36 33 10 6 4 5 38 40 Grand Blanc 8 32 Thornville 7 9 41 39 2 3 37 31 29 1 30 28 Figure 2. 167 Flint River Assessment Saginaw River Tittabawassee River N Lower South Branch Flint River Shiawassee River Cass River 0 10 MILES Fosters Lower Flint River North Branch Montrose Columbiaville Otisville Clio Flushing New Lothrop Lapeer Flint Davison Grand Blanc Thornville Upper Flint River Middle South Branch Flint River Middle Flint River Upper South Branch Flint River Figure 3.–Flint River basin valley segments. 168 Flint River Assessment Superior Lobe Saginaw Lobe Michigan Lobe Huron-Erie Lobe Figure 4.–Diagram of Wisconsinan Glacier with major lobes. Information from Farrand, 1988. 169 Flint River Assessment N Saginaw River Tittabawassee River Huron District 0 10 Sandusky Subdistrict Shiawassee River MILES Cass River Saginaw District Fosters North Branch Ionia District Montrose Greenville Subdistrict Columbiaville Otisville Clio Flushing New Lothrop Lapeer Flint Davison Grand Blanc Thornville Huron District Lum Subdistrict Ionia District Lansing Subdistrict Figure 5.–Regional Landscape Ecosystem boundaries of the Flint River basin. Data from Albert 1994. 170 Flint River Assessment Saginaw River Tittabawassee River N Shiawassee River Cass River 0 10 MILES Fosters North Branch Montrose Columbiaville Otisville Clio Flushing New Lothrop Lapeer Flint Davison Grand Blanc Thornville Ground water inflows less than the Lower Pennisula mean Ground water inflows greater than the Lower Pennisula mean Figure 6.–Flint River basin groundwater inow. 171 Flint River Assessment Saginaw River Tittabawassee River N Shiawassee River Cass River 0 10 MILES 16 Fosters 15 North Branch Montrose 14 2 6 Columbiaville 3 Otisville Clio 4 7 5 Flushing New Lothrop Lapeer 1 13 Flint 8 Davison 9 12 10 Grand Blanc Thornville 11 1. Farmers Creek (04146000) 9. Gilkey Creek (04148160) 2. South Branch Flint River (04146063) 10. Thread Creek (04148440) 3. Flint River (04146500) 11. Swartz Creek (04148200) 4. Holloway Reservoir (04147000) 12. Swartz Creek (04148300) 5. Flint River (04147500) 13. Flint River (04148500) 6. Butternutt Creek (04147990) 14. Brent Run (04147200) 7. Flint River (04148000) 15. Flint River (04149000) 8. Kearsley Creek (04148140) 16. Flint River (04149500) Figure 7.–Approximate locations of Flint River basin United States Geological Survey (USGS) gauging stations. USGS identification number in parentheses. Bold circle indicates active gauging station, all others are retired stations. 172 Flint River Assessment 2000 1800 Flint River at Fosters Flint River at Flint 1600 1400 1200 1000 Flint River at Otisville 800 600 Discharge in cubic feet per second 400 200 South Branch Flint River 0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Water year Figure 8.–Mean monthly discharge at four locations on the Flint River. Data source United States Geological Survey gauges for period of record (Table 2). 173 Flint River Assessment 250 Swartz Creek, Flint Kearsley Creek, Davison 200 150 Thread Creek, Flint Farmers Creek, Lapeer 100 Discharge in cubic feet per second 50 Butternut Creek, Flint 0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Water year Figure 9.–Mean monthly discharge for Flint River tributaries. Data from United States Geological Survey for period of record (Table 2). 174 Flint River Assessment 12 S. Br. Flint River, Columbiaville 10 Flint River, Otisville Flint River, Flint 8 Flint River, Fosters 6 4 Standardized discharge 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Percent exceedence Figure 10.–Standardized high flow exceedence curves for the South Branch and mainstem Flint rivers. (Standardized discharge = discharge (Q)/median discharge(50% Q)). Exceedence curves represent the probability of a discharge exceeding a given value. Data from United States Geological Survey gauges for period of record (Table 2). 175 Flint River Assessment 12 Farmers Creek, Lapeer 10 Butternut Creek, Genesee Kearsley Creek, Davison 8 Swartz Creek, Flint Thread Creek, Flint 6 4 Standardized discharge 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Percent exceedence Figure 11.–Standardized high flow exceedence curves for Flint River tributaries. (Standardized discharge = discharge (Q)/median discharge(50% Q)). Exceedence curves represent the probability of a discharge exceeding a given value. Data from United States Geological Survey gauges for period of record (Table 2). 176 Flint River Assessment 1.2 S. Br. Flint River, Columbiaville 1.0 Flint River, Otisville Flint River, Flint 0.8 Flint River, Fosters 0.6 0.4 Standardized discharge 0.2 0.0 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Percent exceedence Figure 12.–Standardized low flow exceedence curves for the South Branch and mainstem Flint rivers. Standardized discharge is the discharge (Q)/median (50% Q) discharge. Exceedence curves represent the probability of a discharge exceeding a given value. Data from United States Geological Survey gauges for period of record (Table 2). 177 Flint River Assessment 1.2 Farmers Creek, Lapeer 1.0 Butternut Creek, Genesee Kearsley Creek, Davison 0.8 Swartz Creek, Flint Thread Creek, Flint 0.6 0.4 Standardized discharge 0.2 0.0 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Percent exceedence Figure 13.–Standardized low flow exceedence curves for Flint River tributaries. Standardized discharge is the discharge (Q)/median (50% Q) discharge. Exceedence curves represent the probability of a discharge exceeding a given value. Data from United States Geological Survey gauges for period of record (Table 2). 178 Flint River Assessment Precipitation in inches 0 0 0 0 1.33 0.37 0.02 1000 d 800 600 400 200 100 Streamflow in cubic feet per secon 50 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 September 2000 Figure 14.–Flint River daily flow at the Flint gauging station before and after a rain event. Data from United States Geological Survey. 179 Flint River Assessment 1050 Horseshoe Lake 950 Plum Creek Shiawassee River 850 Holloway Dam Pine Creek 750 Flushing North Branch 650 Foster Mott Dam Swartz Creek Elevation in feet above sea level 550 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 River mile Figure 15.–Flint River stream elevation. 12 Shiawassee River Flushing 10 Horseshoe Lake 8 Pine Creek 6 Holloway Dam 4 Plum Creek Gradient (feet per mile) 2 Swartz Creek North Branch Foster Mott Dam 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 River mile Figure 16.–Flint River gradient. 180 Flint River Assessment Saginaw River Tittabawassee River N Shiawassee River Cass River 0 10 MILES Fosters North Branch 23 Montrose 7 8 22 6 Columbiaville Otisville Clio 9 Flushing 10 5 New Lothrop Lapeer 15 19Flint 14 Davison 20 1 18 Grand 4 Blanc 13 Thornville 12 3 2 21 17 11 16 1. Winns Pond Dam 13. Atlas Dam 2. Metamora Dam 14. Kearsley Dam 3. Minnawana Dam 15. Utah Dam 4. White Sands Dam 16. Heron Lake Dam 5. Long Lake Dam 17. Perrysville Dam 6. Bottom Creek Dam 18. Thread Lake Dam 7. Hemmingway Lake Dam 19. Hamilton Dam 8. Tau Beta Dam 20. Fiber Dam 9. Earl Holloway Dam 21. Crystal Lake Dam 10. C. S. Mott Dam 22. Mistequay Creek 2A Dam 11. Lake Louise Dam 23. Mistequay Creek 3A Dam 12. Goodrich Dam Figure 17.–Approximate location of principal dams in the Flint River watershed. 181 Flint River Assessment Saginaw River Tittabawassee River N Shiawassee River Cass River 0 10 MILES Fosters North Branch Montrose Columbiaville Otisville Clio Flushing New Lothrop Lapeer Flint Davison Grand Blanc Thornville Cold water designated Cool water designated Warm water designated Figure 18.–Flint River basin thermal habitat classication. 182 Flint River Assessment Saginaw River Tittabawassee River N Shiawassee River Cass River 0 10 MILES Fosters North Branch Montrose Columbiaville Otisville Clio Flushing New Lothrop Lapeer Flint Davison Grand Blanc Thornville Top quality warmwater Second quality warmwater Second quality coldwater Figure 19.–Michigan stream classication, 1967. Data from Michigan Department of Natural resources, Fisheries Division. 183 Flint River Assessment Water Site Location County T R Sec. 1. South Branch Oakwood Road Oakland 05N 10E 10 2.
Recommended publications

  • School Facing Difficult Times

    Cass City Reading all the rage Lady Hawks band students at Campbell this week advance into “amazing” Page 14 district semis Page 6 Page 7 Complete coverage of the Cass City community and surrounding areas since 1899 VOLUME 105, NUMBER 50 CASS CITY, MICHIGAN - WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 29, 2012 75 CENTS ~ 14 PAGES Board extends Hartel’s contract School facing difficult times by Tom Montgomery The board agreed to begin a series Editor of finance meetings over the next several weeks to discuss cost-cutting The good news is that Cass City options. The first of those special Public Schools officials expect to be meetings — all open to the public — sitting on a fund balance of more will be held Monday, March 5, at 7 than $744,000 when they approve p.m. in the high school library. their next budget in late June. The bad news? In spite of having MEAP SCORES implemented a myriad of cost-cut- ting measures over the past few Turning to the latest Michigan years, the Cass City Board of Educational Assessment Program Education is facing the prospect of (MEAP) scores, the board reviewed slashing hundreds of thousands of the latest marks posted by Cass City dollars more in spending in order to students. As expected, the numbers approve a balanced spending plan are dramatically lower due to new for 2012-13. “cut scores” implement by the Mike Klosowski, chief financial Michigan Department of Education officer for the Cass City Public in an effort to raise the bar for stu- Schools, outlined his latest financial dent achievement.
  • Saginaw River/Bay Fish & Wildlife Habitat BUI Removal Documentation

    Saginaw River/Bay Fish & Wildlife Habitat BUI Removal Documentation

    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 6 MAY 2014 REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF Mr. Roger Eberhardt Acting Deputy Director, Office of the Great Lakes Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 525 West Allegan P.O. Box 30473 Lansing, Michigan 48909-7773 Dear Roger: Thank you for your February 6, 2014, request to remove the "Loss of Fish and Wildlife Habitat" Beneficial Use Impairment (BUI) from the Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern (AOC) in Michigan, As you know, we share your desire to restore all of the Great Lakes AOCs and to formally delist them. Based upon a review of your submittal and the supporting data, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency hereby approves your BUI removal request for the Saginaw River/Bay AOC, EPA will notify the International Joint Commission of this significant positive environmental change at this AOC. We congratulate you and your staff, as well as the many federal, state, and local partners who have worked so hard and been instrumental in achieving this important environmental improvement. Removal of this BUI will benefit not only the people who live and work in the Saginaw River/Bay AOC, but all the residents of Michigan and the Great Lakes basin as well. We look forward to the continuation of this important and productive relationship with your agency and the local coordinating committee as we work together to fully restore all of Michigan's AOCs. If you have any further questions, please contact me at (312) 353-4891, or your staff may contact John Perrecone, at (312) 353-1149.
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alpena FWCO - Detroit River Substation Fisheries Evaluation of the Frankenmuth Rock Ramp in Frankenmuth, MI Final Report - October 2019 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alpena FWCO – Detroit River Substation 9311 Groh Road Grosse Ile, MI 48138 Paige Wigren, Justin Chiotti, Joe Leonardi, and James Boase Suggested Citation: Wigren, P.L., J.A. Chiotti, J.M. Leonardi, and J.C. Boase. 2019. Alpena FWCO – Detroit River Substation Fisheries Evaluation of the Frankenmuth Rock Ramp in Frankenmuth, MI. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alpena Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office – Waterford Substation, Waterford, MI, 22 pp. On the cover: Staff from the Alpena Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office – Detroit River Substation holding the only northern pike that was recaptured upstream of the rock ramp; a tagged walleye; a small flathead catfish; a net full of tagged fish ready to be released downstream; four tagged white suckers recaptured upstream and boat crew conducting an electrofishing transect. 3 Summary Since the construction of the rock ramp, 17 fish species not previously detected upstream have been captured. These species include eight freshwater drum, eleven walleye, two gizzard shad, eight flathead catfish and two round goby. Over the past three years 2,604 fish have been tagged downstream of the rock ramp. Twenty-nine of these fish were recaptured upstream during boat electrofishing assessments or by anglers. Based on the mean monthly discharge of the Cass River during April and May, the data suggests that white and redhorse suckers can move past the rock ramp during normal discharge years.
  • Flint River Flood Mitigation Alternatives Saginaw County, Michigan

    Flint River Flood Mitigation Alternatives Saginaw County, Michigan

    Draft Environmental Assessment Flint River Flood Mitigation Alternatives Saginaw County, Michigan Flint River Erosion Control Board FEMA-DR-1346-MI, HMGP Project No. A1346.53 April 2006 U.S. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region V 536 South Clark Street, Sixth Floor Chicago, IL 60605 This document was prepared by URS Group, Inc. 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Suite 101 Gaithersburg, MD 20878 Contract No. EMW-2000-CO-0246, Task Order No. 138. Job No. 15292488.00100 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ iii Section 1 ONE Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Authority..........................................................................................1 1.2 Project Location and Setting........................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................2 Section 2 TWO Alternative Analysis .......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Alternative 1 – No Action Alternative.........................................................3 2.2 Alternative 2 – Dike Reconstruction and Reservoir Construction (Proposed Action) ........................................................................................3 2.2.1 Project Segment
  • The Logging of the Cass River Michigan's Thumb

    The Logging of the Cass River Michigan's Thumb

    The Logging of the Cass River Michigan’s Thumb By Mark R. Putnam Choppers falling a tree of cork pine . The work was done near Fostoria where the forests were majestic and divine. Page 1 of 114 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER ONE: THE SAGINAW TREATY—1819 ............................................................................... 5 CHAPTER TWO: ROAD BUILDING & SURVEYING—1820-1835 ....................................................... 9 CHAPTER THREE: WILLIAM’S MILL—1836-1846 ........................................................................... 23 CHAPTER FOUR: THE EARLY DAYS OF SPECULATION—1835-1837 ............................................. 30 CHAPTER FIVE: THE FINANCIAL BUST—1837 ................................................................................ 39 CHAPTER SIX: THE PERRY’S MILL & THE FLOATWOOD DAM—1835-1840 ................................. 43 CHAPTER SEVEN: THE RICHARDSON, HUBINGER, EMERSON, & NORTH MILLS—1840-1849 .... 60 CHAPTER EIGHT: WASHINGTON & MICHIGAN PROMOTE TIMBERLAND SALES—1850's .......... 77 CHAPTER NINE: NAVIGATION COMPANIES—1850's-60's ............................................................ 83 CHAPTER TEN: THE DRIVE TO THE PINERY—1850's ..................................................................... 86 CHAPTER ELEVEN: WATEROUS & HEART MILLS—1853 ............................................................... 87 CHAPTER TWELVE: THE SPECUALTOR &
  • Advances in Agricultural Drainage

    Advances in Agricultural Drainage

    2 Shiawassee Conservation District Annual Report • Sunday, February 18, 2018 Shiawassee Conservation District Annual Report • Sunday, February 18, 2018 3 Controlled drainage, or drainage water management, Advances in uses a control structure to manage the level of water above the tile line. The control structure is placed close Agricultural Drainage to the outlet and water levels are controlled by adding Drainage has been part of U.S. agriculture since co- or removing “stop logs” or by the use of flow valves. lonial times, but it expanded to a broad scale when A field is typically divided into “drainage management Europeans settled the Midwest. At that time, large zones,” each managed by one control structure. Ideally, proportions of Michigan were swampland unsuited for the field should be flat (generally less than 0.5 percent normal cultivation. Most of the drainage occurred in slope) so that one structure can manage the water table the late 1800s and early 1900s. within 1 to 2 feet for as many acres as possible. If drain- The purpose of drainage is to remove excess water age laterals are installed on the contour, the practice and lower the water table. This creates a well-aerated could be used with greater slopes, but flatter fields re- environment for roots and soil organisms. Drainage al- quire fewer overall structures and allow each structure lows earlier warming of soil in the spring, and earlier to manage a larger area. traffic on fields. Installation of drainage tiles can have Drainage water management can be helpful for keep- a rapid and large return on the capital investment, by ing nutrients in the field by limiting runoff of subsur- substantially improving productivity.
  • (PFAS) in the Saginaw River Watershed: Surface Water Sampling October 2019

    (PFAS) in the Saginaw River Watershed: Surface Water Sampling October 2019

    Investigation of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the Saginaw River Watershed: Surface Water Sampling October 2019 Perfluorinated and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) are a very large class of man-made organic chemicals that have been used in numerous industrial processes and consumer products for over 60 years. Validated analytical methods are available for relatively few of the thousands of compounds. Much of the environmental monitoring of PFAS in Michigan has focused on measuring only perfluorinated chemicals. Many PFAS are persistent, some bioaccumulate in the environment, and several are toxic to mammals and/or birds in laboratory tests. The toxicities of most PFAS have not been evaluated. Two perfluorinated compounds; perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), have been the subject of the most toxicological work and environmental monitoring. Both compounds were manufactured intentionally, but they can also be generated as byproducts when other fluorinated compounds break down. In addition, several PFAS are key ingredients in fire-fighting foams. These foams have been used extensively in fire training exercises at military bases nation-wide; in recent years PFAS have been detected in surface and groundwater near many military facilities. Many products containing PFAS are used in numerous industrial processes including metal plating, textile production and treatment, and specialty paper production. Industrial and domestic waste containing these compounds can enter the environment through municipal or private waste treatment systems, stormwater runoff, venting groundwater, or as deposition after emissions into the atmosphere. Both PFOS and PFOA have been measured in surface waters across the state, and PFOS has been detected in most fish tissue samples from Michigan waters that have been analyzed for PFAS.
  • Shiawassee County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)

    Shiawassee County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)

    SHIAWASSEE COUNTY, MICHIGAN (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Community Community Community Community Name Number Name Number *ANTRIM, TOWNSHIP OF 261162 NEW LOTHROP, VILLAGE OF 260924 BANCROFT, VILLAGE OF 260520 *OVID, VILLAGE OF 260318 BENNINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF 261163 OWOSSO, CHARTER 260809 BURNS, TOWNSHIP OF 260762 TOWNSHIP OF BYRON, VILLAGE OF 260601 OWOSSO, CITY OF 260596 CALEDONIA, CHARTER 260300 *PERRY, CITY OF 261182 TOWNSHIP OF *PERRY, TOWNSHIP OF 261156 CORUNNA, CITY OF 260602 RUSH TOWNSHIP OF 260522 *DURAND, CITY OF 261181 *SCIOTA, TOWNSHIP OF 261157 *FAIRFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF 261164 SHIAWASSEE, 260523 HAZELTON, TOWNSHIP OF 260925 TOWNSHIP OF Shiawassee County *LAINGSBURG, CITY OF 260950 VENICE, TOWNSHIP OF 261158 *LENNON, VILLAGE OF 261183 VERNON, TOWNSHIP OF 261159 MIDDLEBURY, TOWNSHIP OF 261155 VERNON, VILLAGE OF 260524 *MORRICE, VILLAGE OF 261184 *WOODHULL, 261160 NEW HAVEN, TOWNSHIP OF 260521 TOWNSHIP OF *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified Preliminary: FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 26155CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components.
  • Bidding Documents

    Bidding Documents

    MISTEGUAY CREEK INTERCOUNTY DRAIN BIDDING DOCUMENTS Prepared For: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE & RURAL DEVELOPMENT GENESEE COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER SAGINAW COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSIONER SHIAWASSEE COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER Prepared By: Project I.D. Number 118598SG2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Division Section Title Pages BIDDING / CONTRACT DOCUMENTS (EJCDC) C-111 NOTICE OF LETTING 6 C-200 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS 8 C-220 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE IRAN LINKED BUSINESS 1 C-410 BID FORM 8 FUEL ESTIMATION SPREADSHEET 1 C-510 NOTICE OF AWARD 1 C-520 AGREEMENT STIPULATED PRICE 6 C-550 NOTICE TO PROCEED 1 C-610 PERFORMANCE BOND 3 C-615 PAYMENT BOND 4 C-625 CERTIFICATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION 1 C-700 GENERAL CONDITIONS 65 C-800 SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS 7 C-941 CHANGE ORDER 1 C-943 LANDOWNER AGREEMENT 1 C-944 AFFIDAVITT AND CONSENT OF SURETY 2 SPECIFICATIONS GROUP General Requirements Subgroup DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 011000 SUMMARY 2 012000 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 5 012500 SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES 2 013000 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 5 013216 CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS SCHEDULE 2 013300 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES 6 014000 QUALITY REQUIREMENTS 4 015000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS 5 015526 TRAFFIC CONTROL 3 016000 PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS 3 017000 EXECUTION AND CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS 4 Facility Construction Subgroup DIVISION 03 - CONCRETE 031000 CONCRETE FORMING AND ACCESSORIES 9 032000 CONCRETE REINFORCING 6 033000 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE 10 033900 CONCRETE CURING 2 Misteguay Creek Intercounty Drain Table of Contents Misteguay Creek Intercounty
  • Pregnant? New Mom? Breastfeeding

    Pregnant? New Mom? Breastfeeding

    Frankenmuth N&S, Vassar E&W, Reese, PRSRT STD. 344 N. State Street | Caro, MI 48723 US POSTAGE An Edwards Publication Richville, Millington N&S, Saginaw, PAID Birch Run, Bridgeport PERMIT #792 ROYAL OAK, MI 48068 PRIME PROPERTIES ECRWSSEDDM RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER Sherry L. Morris, Broker/Owner 810-223-6291 989-262-7005 THIS WEEK’S INSERTS (DEPENDING ON ZIP CODE) 989.673.3181 Wingert’s • VG’s • Central Shop Rite • www.cassrivertrader.com www.sherryshouses.com Rite Aid • Menard • TLC Insurance Saturday, July 24, 2021 Pregnant? New mom? Have a child under the age 5? Breastfeeding? Call us today! 989-673-3199 Only 55% of eligible families are currently on WIC. Do you know someone who may qualify for WIC? Tell them about us! #momstrong This institution is an equal opportunity provider 2 | Cass River Trader cassrivertrader.com Saturday, July 24, 2021 AD STARTS: July 26th THRU Simon’s Aug 1st 2021 GROCERY EXPRESS STOP 7600 Birch Run Road, Arbela Twp. Millington / 989-871-4314 We reserve the right to limit quantities and are not responsible for printing errors. Hours: M-F 7 A.M. - 8 P.M; Saturday 8 A.M. - 8 P.M; Sunday 8:30 A.M. - 7 P.M / We Accept: EBT, Major Credit Cards, Check & Sunoco Card STOP IN FOR MORE IN-STORE SAVINGS! 10/$ GENERAL GROCERY SALE GENERAL MEAT SALE 10 Family Pack Family Pack Family Pack PLOCHMAN JELLO NEW YORK TOP SIRLOIN GROUND ¢ TOMATOES & PUDDING PIE STRIP STEAK CHUCK 89 TOMATO SAUCE MUSTARD & GELATIN FILLING $ 99 $ 49 $ 29 8 lb. 5 lb. lb.
  • Cass River E. Coli

    Cass River E. Coli

    MI/DEQ/WRD-18/012 E. coli Results and Source Assessment: Portions of the Lower Cass River and Tributaries, including Millington, Cole, Perry, and Dead Creeks Genesee, Saginaw, and Tuscola Counties Michigan Department of Environmental Quality - Water Resources Division May 2018 Table of Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... i List of Appendices ................................................................................................................... ii 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 WATER QUALITY PROBLEM ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................................................1 1.3 WATER QUALITY STANDARD ..................................................................................................................3 3. DATA DISCUSSION.......................................................................................................... 3 4. SOURCE ASSESSMENT................................................................................................... 5 4.1 LOAD DURATION CURVE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................6 4.2 POINT SOURCES
  • Remedial Action Plan

    Remedial Action Plan

    Michigan Department of Natural Resources Remedial Action Plan for SAGINAW RIVER AND SAGINAW BAY Area of Concern September 1988 Michigan Department of Natural Resources Surface Water Quality Division Great Lakes and Environmental 'Assessment Section P.O. Box 30028 Lansing, Michigan 48909 PREFACE This Saginaw RiverIBay Remedial Action Plan (RAP) was prepared by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) from a first draft compiled for MDNR by the East Central Michigan Planning and Development Region, the National Wildlife Federation, and graduate students from the University of Michigan. The Remedial Action Section was prepared by MDNR and a regional public organization known as the Saginaw Basin Natural Resources Steering Committee. Public and technical comment was received throughout the RAP development and review process as described in Section VI. The RAP summarizes existing water quality data on the Saginaw Bay drainage basin and outlines initial perceptions of the remedial actions that should be taken to further address the eutrophication and toxic material problems in the Saginaw River and Saginaw Bay. The remedial actions presented here will be further refined in future versions of the RAP, which it is anticipated, will be periodically updated and revised as more data are acquired, remedial measures are implemented, and environmental conditions improve. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS An extensive list of people and agencies contributed a great deal of time and effort to develop this plan. The complete list is too extensive to present