DOCSLIB.ORG

Flint River Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flint River Assessment Michigan STATE OF MICHIGAN DNR DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Number 27 July 2001 Flint River Assessment Joseph M. Leonardi and William J. Gruhn www.dnr.state.mi.us FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION July 2001 Flint River Assessment Joseph M. Leonardi and William J. Gruhn The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, as amended, (1976 MI P.A. 453 and 1976 MI P.A. 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act). If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility, or if you desire additional information, please write the MDNR Office of Legal Services, P.O. Box 30028, Lansing, MI 48909; or the Michigan Department of Civil Rights, State of Michigan, Plaza Building, 1200 6th Ave., Detroit, MI 48226 or the Office of Human Resources, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Diversity and Civil Rights Programs, 4040 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA. 22203. For information or assistance on this publication, contact the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, Box 30446, Lansing, MI 48909, or call 517-373-1280. This publication is available in alternative formats. Printed under authority of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Michigan DNR Total number of copies printed 440 — Total cost $2,743.50 — Cost per copy $6.24 Flint River Assessment Suggested Citation Format Leonardi, J.M., and W.J. Gruhn. 2001. Flint River Assessment. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, Special Report.27, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2 Flint River Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................6 LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................8 LIST OF APPENDICES ...........................................................................................10 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..........................................................................................11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................13 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................17 RIVER ASSESSMENT.............................................................................................21 Geography ..................................................................................................................... 21 Upper South Branch Flint River ................................................................................ 21 Middle South Branch Flint River................................................................................ 21 Lower South Branch Flint River ................................................................................ 21 Upper Flint River....................................................................................................... 21 Middle Flint River ...................................................................................................... 21 Lower Flint River....................................................................................................... 22 History............................................................................................................................ 22 Geology and Hydrology................................................................................................ 24 Geology ....................................................................................................................... 24 Climate.........................................................................................................................25 Annual Stream Flow..................................................................................................... 25 Seasonal Water Flow................................................................................................... 26 Daily Water Flow.......................................................................................................... 27 Consumptive Water Use, Irrigation............................................................................... 28 Flooding ....................................................................................................................... 28 Soils and Land Use Patterns ........................................................................................ 29 Soils............................................................................................................................. 29 Upper South Branch Flint River ................................................................................ 29 Middle South Branch Flint River................................................................................ 30 Lower South Branch Flint River ................................................................................ 30 Upper and Middle Flint River..................................................................................... 30 Lower Flint River....................................................................................................... 30 Land Use ..................................................................................................................... 31 Agriculture.................................................................................................................... 31 Urban Development ..................................................................................................... 32 Channel Morphology..................................................................................................... 32 Gradient....................................................................................................................... 32 Channel Cross Section ................................................................................................ 33 Dams and Barriers ........................................................................................................ 33 Upper South Branch Flint River ................................................................................ 35 Middle South Branch Flint River................................................................................ 36 Lower South Branch Flint River ................................................................................ 36 Upper Flint River....................................................................................................... 36 Middle Flint River ...................................................................................................... 37 Lower Flint River....................................................................................................... 38 Bridges and Other Stream Crossings........................................................................... 38 3 Flint River Assessment Special Jurisdictions .....................................................................................................39 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Jurisdiction...............................................39 Coastal Zone Management...........................................................................................39 Navigability ...................................................................................................................39 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)..........................................................40 Natural and Scenic River Designation...........................................................................40 County Drain Commissions...........................................................................................40 Federal Government.....................................................................................................41 State Government.........................................................................................................42 Water Quality..................................................................................................................42 Overview.......................................................................................................................42 Point Source Pollution...................................................................................................43 Nonpoint Source Pollution.............................................................................................44 Sites of Environmental Contamination (Part 201 Sites).................................................44 Water Parameters.........................................................................................................45 Bacteria ........................................................................................................................45 Sediment Parameters ...................................................................................................46 Fish Contaminants........................................................................................................46 Summary by valley segments .......................................................................................47
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2008 and 2013 Flint River Watershed Biosurvey Monitoring Report
    MI/DEQ/WRD-17/009 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION APRIL 2017 STAFF REPORT A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE FLINT RIVER AND SELECTED TRIBUTARIES IN GENESEE, LAPEER, OAKLAND, SANILAC, SAGINAW, SHIAWASSEE, AND TUSCOLA COUNTIES JUNE-SEPTEMBER 2008 AND 2013 Qualitative biological sampling of the Flint River watershed was conducted by staff of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), Surface Water Assessment Section (SWAS), from June-September of both 2008 and 2013 as part of a five-year watershed monitoring cycle. The Flint River watershed is a vast watershed that falls within two ecoregions: the Southern Michigan Northern Indiana Till Plain and Huron and Lake Erie Till Plain ecoregions (Omernik and Gallant, 1988). Land use in the Flint River watershed is predominantly agriculture and forested with portions also being urban. The Flint River is a major tributary to the Saginaw River/Bay ecosystem. OBJECTIVES These biological surveys were conducted to: • Assess the current status condition of individual waters to determine attainment of Michigan Water Quality Standards (WQS). • Evaluate potential impacts from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)-regulated sources to water quality in the watersheds. • Identify potential nonpoint sources (NPS) of water quality impairment. • Satisfy monitoring request submitted by internal and external customers. The locations of the surveyed biological stations are illustrated in Figures 1a (2008) and 1b (2013) and Tables 1a (2008) and 1b (2013). For the 2008 data, detailed macroinvertebrate, fish, and habitat sampling results are provided in Tables 2a and 2b, 3a and 3b, and 4, respectively. Water (14 locations) and sediment (2 locations) chemistry samples were collected during the 2008 watershed assessment; locations and results can be found in Tables 5 and 6.
    [Show full text]
  • School Facing Difficult Times
    Cass City Reading all the rage Lady Hawks band students at Campbell this week advance into “amazing” Page 14 district semis Page 6 Page 7 Complete coverage of the Cass City community and surrounding areas since 1899 VOLUME 105, NUMBER 50 CASS CITY, MICHIGAN - WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 29, 2012 75 CENTS ~ 14 PAGES Board extends Hartel’s contract School facing difficult times by Tom Montgomery The board agreed to begin a series Editor of finance meetings over the next several weeks to discuss cost-cutting The good news is that Cass City options. The first of those special Public Schools officials expect to be meetings — all open to the public — sitting on a fund balance of more will be held Monday, March 5, at 7 than $744,000 when they approve p.m. in the high school library. their next budget in late June. The bad news? In spite of having MEAP SCORES implemented a myriad of cost-cut- ting measures over the past few Turning to the latest Michigan years, the Cass City Board of Educational Assessment Program Education is facing the prospect of (MEAP) scores, the board reviewed slashing hundreds of thousands of the latest marks posted by Cass City dollars more in spending in order to students. As expected, the numbers approve a balanced spending plan are dramatically lower due to new for 2012-13. “cut scores” implement by the Mike Klosowski, chief financial Michigan Department of Education officer for the Cass City Public in an effort to raise the bar for stu- Schools, outlined his latest financial dent achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Point Source Water Contamination Module Was Originally Published in 2003 by the Advanced Technology Environmental and Energy Center (ATEEC)
    From the POINT SOURCE Technology and Environmental Decision-Making WATER Series CONTAMINATION This 2017 version of the Point Source Water Contamination module was originally published in 2003 by the Advanced Technology Environmental and Energy Center (ATEEC). The module, part of the series Technology and Environmental Decision-Making: A critical-thinking approach to 7 environmental challenges, was initially developed by ATEEC and the Laboratory for Energy and Environment at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and funded by the National Science Foundation. The ATEEC project team has updated this version of the module and gratefully acknowledges the past and present contributions, assistance, and thoughtful critiques of this material provided by authors, content experts, and reviewers. These contributors do not, however, necessarily approve, disapprove, or endorse these modules. Any errors in the modules are the responsibility of ATEEC. Authors: Melonee Docherty, ATEEC Michael Beck, ATEEC Editor: Glo Hanne, ATEEC Copyright 2017, ATEEC This project was supported, in part, by the Advanced Technological Education Program at the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE #1204958. The information provided in this instructional material does not necessarily represent NSF policy. Cover image: Ground water monitoring wells, Cape Cod, MA. Credit: U.S. Geological Survey. Additional copies of this module can be downloaded from the ATEEC website. i Point Source Water Contamination Corroded pipes from Flint’s water distribution system.
    [Show full text]
  • Saginaw River/Bay Fish & Wildlife Habitat BUI Removal Documentation
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 6 MAY 2014 REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF Mr. Roger Eberhardt Acting Deputy Director, Office of the Great Lakes Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 525 West Allegan P.O. Box 30473 Lansing, Michigan 48909-7773 Dear Roger: Thank you for your February 6, 2014, request to remove the "Loss of Fish and Wildlife Habitat" Beneficial Use Impairment (BUI) from the Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern (AOC) in Michigan, As you know, we share your desire to restore all of the Great Lakes AOCs and to formally delist them. Based upon a review of your submittal and the supporting data, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency hereby approves your BUI removal request for the Saginaw River/Bay AOC, EPA will notify the International Joint Commission of this significant positive environmental change at this AOC. We congratulate you and your staff, as well as the many federal, state, and local partners who have worked so hard and been instrumental in achieving this important environmental improvement. Removal of this BUI will benefit not only the people who live and work in the Saginaw River/Bay AOC, but all the residents of Michigan and the Great Lakes basin as well. We look forward to the continuation of this important and productive relationship with your agency and the local coordinating committee as we work together to fully restore all of Michigan's AOCs. If you have any further questions, please contact me at (312) 353-4891, or your staff may contact John Perrecone, at (312) 353-1149.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alpena FWCO - Detroit River Substation Fisheries Evaluation of the Frankenmuth Rock Ramp in Frankenmuth, MI Final Report - October 2019 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alpena FWCO – Detroit River Substation 9311 Groh Road Grosse Ile, MI 48138 Paige Wigren, Justin Chiotti, Joe Leonardi, and James Boase Suggested Citation: Wigren, P.L., J.A. Chiotti, J.M. Leonardi, and J.C. Boase. 2019. Alpena FWCO – Detroit River Substation Fisheries Evaluation of the Frankenmuth Rock Ramp in Frankenmuth, MI. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alpena Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office – Waterford Substation, Waterford, MI, 22 pp. On the cover: Staff from the Alpena Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office – Detroit River Substation holding the only northern pike that was recaptured upstream of the rock ramp; a tagged walleye; a small flathead catfish; a net full of tagged fish ready to be released downstream; four tagged white suckers recaptured upstream and boat crew conducting an electrofishing transect. 3 Summary Since the construction of the rock ramp, 17 fish species not previously detected upstream have been captured. These species include eight freshwater drum, eleven walleye, two gizzard shad, eight flathead catfish and two round goby. Over the past three years 2,604 fish have been tagged downstream of the rock ramp. Twenty-nine of these fish were recaptured upstream during boat electrofishing assessments or by anglers. Based on the mean monthly discharge of the Cass River during April and May, the data suggests that white and redhorse suckers can move past the rock ramp during normal discharge years.
    [Show full text]
  • Flint River Flood Mitigation Alternatives Saginaw County, Michigan
    Draft Environmental Assessment Flint River Flood Mitigation Alternatives Saginaw County, Michigan Flint River Erosion Control Board FEMA-DR-1346-MI, HMGP Project No. A1346.53 April 2006 U.S. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region V 536 South Clark Street, Sixth Floor Chicago, IL 60605 This document was prepared by URS Group, Inc. 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Suite 101 Gaithersburg, MD 20878 Contract No. EMW-2000-CO-0246, Task Order No. 138. Job No. 15292488.00100 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ iii Section 1 ONE Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Authority..........................................................................................1 1.2 Project Location and Setting........................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................2 Section 2 TWO Alternative Analysis .......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Alternative 1 – No Action Alternative.........................................................3 2.2 Alternative 2 – Dike Reconstruction and Reservoir Construction (Proposed Action) ........................................................................................3 2.2.1 Project Segment
    [Show full text]
  • Flint River GREEN Notebook Table of Contents Section One - Introduction to Flint River GREEN
    Flint River GREEN www.FlintRiver.org Flint River GREEN Notebook Table of Contents Section One - Introduction to Flint River GREEN a. FRWC b. GREEN c. Earth Force d. MSU Extension; 4-H Youth Development e. School Administration Letter (Phase II & Participant Appreciation) f. Flint River GREEN Objectives Section Two – Information for Mentors a. Who are mentors? b. Timeline for Teachers and Mentor Interactions c. Importance of Mentors d. Inquiry Training e. How to talk to youth f. Sample Presentations for Mentors Section Three – BEFORE River Activities a. Curriculum Benchmarks and Standards i. 8th Grade Earth Science Standards ii. 10th Grade Biology Standards b. Incorporating Other Teachers iii. Civic Engagement: Social Studies, Language Arts iv. Technology: Media Support, Presentations v. Sharing Testing: Chemistry, Mathematics c. Ordering Materials vi. Shelf Life of Chemicals vii. Disposal of Old Chemicals d. Inquiry Training: Why is the Data Important viii. How Can the Information Be Used ix. Who Is Currently Interested in the Data e. Selecting A Testing Site / Finding A Good Fit f. Preparing Kids for the Day at the River x. Attire Flint River GREEN www.FlintRiver.org xi. Who Does Which Test g. Run Through the Tests h. Looking at Historical Data i. Permission Slip/Photo releases j. Notifying the media and elected officials xii. Sample Press Release k. Optional Activities xiii. Model Watershed Activity xiv. Watershed Planning – Desired & Designated Uses xv. ELUCID – Flint River Watershed by MSU Institute of Water Research Section Four – Day At the River a. Deciding Who Goes to the River b. Checklist for Things to Take Out to the River c.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Indicators
    SECTION 4 - WATER QUALITY INDICATORS RIVERINE HABITAT STUDIES Fisheries Studies The original fish communities of the Great Lakes region are of recent origin. Melt water from the Wisconsinan glacier created aquatic environments for fish. Original fish gained access through migration from connecting waterways. A description of the fish community in the Flint River Watershed at the time of European settlement (early 1800’s) is not available. However anecdotal accounts of the time mention several species. Surveys on the Flint River and several tributaries in 1927 provide a reasonable account for additional indigenous fish species (MDNR, Fishery Division). Seventy-seven species are believed to indigenous to the Flint River Watershed. The Original fish habitat of the Flint River watershed has been greatly altered by human settlement. The 1900’s gave rise to the industrial era and the urbanization of the Flint River watershed. City’s and towns located near the river became more developed as their population increased. The discharge of human wastes and synthetic pollutants into the river degraded water quality to the extent that only the most tolerant fish species could survive. Dams were built for flood control, flow augmentation, and water supply to municipalities and industry. The biologic communities in the Flint River and its tributaries have improved significantly since the 1970’s with water quality improvements. Continued efforts to improve water quality will most probably result in greater biological integrity and diversity. Although 77 species of fish remain present, at least 5 fish species that once used the Flint River for spawning (lake sturgeon, muskellunge, lake trout, lake herring, lake whitefish) are believed extirpated from the river.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Geography of Saginaw, Michigan
    Wayne State University Wayne State University Theses 1-1-1933 The rbU an Geography of Saginaw, Michigan Dennis Glenn Cooper Wayne State University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_theses Part of the Geography Commons, History Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Cooper, Dennis Glenn, "The rU ban Geography of Saginaw, Michigan" (1933). Wayne State University Theses. Paper 465. This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. THE URBAN GEOGRAPHY OF SAGINAW, MICHIGAN A Thesis SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE COLLEGES OF THE CITY OF DETROIT IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS. BY Dennis Glen Cooper Detroit, Michigan 1933 t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s I. O u t l i n e ...................... ill II. List of maps, graphs, ana pictures............. vi III. THE URBAN GEOGRAPHY OF SAG INAL, MICHIGAN. 1 IV. Appendix . .......... « . .... 59 V. Bibliography ....................... • 62 f ii THE URBAN GEOGRAPHY OF SAGINAW, MICHIGAN. Outline Page A. Outstanding characteristics of the city............ • 1 1, Unusual landscape pattern with tvvc distinct nuclei 2. Industrial development in transition stage between period of extractive activities and diversified industries B. General situation: the Saginaw Basin • *.*•••* 2 1. Topography 2. Soil 3* Climate 4, Natural resources 5, Drainage C* Site • 4 1* Position of glacial moraine crossing valley 2. Bluff cut in moraine at outer bend and on west side of river 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Flint Fights Back, Environmental Justice And
    Thank you for your purchase of Flint Fights Back. We bet you can’t wait to get reading! By purchasing this book through The MIT Press, you are given special privileges that you don’t typically get through in-device purchases. For instance, we don’t lock you down to any one device, so if you want to read it on another device you own, please feel free to do so! This book belongs to: [email protected] With that being said, this book is yours to read and it’s registered to you alone — see how we’ve embedded your email address to it? This message serves as a reminder that transferring digital files such as this book to third parties is prohibited by international copyright law. We hope you enjoy your new book! Flint Fights Back Urban and Industrial Environments Series editor: Robert Gottlieb, Henry R. Luce Professor of Urban and Environmental Policy, Occidental College For a complete list of books published in this series, please see the back of the book. Flint Fights Back Environmental Justice and Democracy in the Flint Water Crisis Benjamin J. Pauli The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England © 2019 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. This book was set in Stone Serif by Westchester Publishing Services. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Pauli, Benjamin J., author.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logging of the Cass River Michigan's Thumb
    The Logging of the Cass River Michigan’s Thumb By Mark R. Putnam Choppers falling a tree of cork pine . The work was done near Fostoria where the forests were majestic and divine. Page 1 of 114 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER ONE: THE SAGINAW TREATY—1819 ............................................................................... 5 CHAPTER TWO: ROAD BUILDING & SURVEYING—1820-1835 ....................................................... 9 CHAPTER THREE: WILLIAM’S MILL—1836-1846 ........................................................................... 23 CHAPTER FOUR: THE EARLY DAYS OF SPECULATION—1835-1837 ............................................. 30 CHAPTER FIVE: THE FINANCIAL BUST—1837 ................................................................................ 39 CHAPTER SIX: THE PERRY’S MILL & THE FLOATWOOD DAM—1835-1840 ................................. 43 CHAPTER SEVEN: THE RICHARDSON, HUBINGER, EMERSON, & NORTH MILLS—1840-1849 .... 60 CHAPTER EIGHT: WASHINGTON & MICHIGAN PROMOTE TIMBERLAND SALES—1850's .......... 77 CHAPTER NINE: NAVIGATION COMPANIES—1850's-60's ............................................................ 83 CHAPTER TEN: THE DRIVE TO THE PINERY—1850's ..................................................................... 86 CHAPTER ELEVEN: WATEROUS & HEART MILLS—1853 ............................................................... 87 CHAPTER TWELVE: THE SPECUALTOR &
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Agricultural Drainage
    2 Shiawassee Conservation District Annual Report • Sunday, February 18, 2018 Shiawassee Conservation District Annual Report • Sunday, February 18, 2018 3 Controlled drainage, or drainage water management, Advances in uses a control structure to manage the level of water above the tile line. The control structure is placed close Agricultural Drainage to the outlet and water levels are controlled by adding Drainage has been part of U.S. agriculture since co- or removing “stop logs” or by the use of flow valves. lonial times, but it expanded to a broad scale when A field is typically divided into “drainage management Europeans settled the Midwest. At that time, large zones,” each managed by one control structure. Ideally, proportions of Michigan were swampland unsuited for the field should be flat (generally less than 0.5 percent normal cultivation. Most of the drainage occurred in slope) so that one structure can manage the water table the late 1800s and early 1900s. within 1 to 2 feet for as many acres as possible. If drain- The purpose of drainage is to remove excess water age laterals are installed on the contour, the practice and lower the water table. This creates a well-aerated could be used with greater slopes, but flatter fields re- environment for roots and soil organisms. Drainage al- quire fewer overall structures and allow each structure lows earlier warming of soil in the spring, and earlier to manage a larger area. traffic on fields. Installation of drainage tiles can have Drainage water management can be helpful for keep- a rapid and large return on the capital investment, by ing nutrients in the field by limiting runoff of subsur- substantially improving productivity.
    [Show full text]