DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX D, NEWPORT BAY WATERSHED ACTION PLAN TABLE of CONTENTS Executive Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX D, NEWPORT BAY WATERSHED ACTION PLAN TABLE of CONTENTS Executive Summary APPENDIX D, NEWPORT BAY WATERSHED ACTION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 4 D-1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 6 D-1.1 Watershed Setting ........................................................................................................ 9 D-1.2 Beneficial Uses ........................................................................................................... 18 D-1.3 Constituents of Concern ........................................................................................... 22 D-1.4 Watershed Program Management .......................................................................... 23 D-1.4.1 NPDES Coordination ......................................................................... 23 D-1.4.2 Watershed Management Framework .............................................. 23 D-2.0 Water Quality Assessment ........................................................................................................ 27 D-2.1 Summary of Monitoring Activities ......................................................................... 28 D-2.1.1 NPDES Monitoring and Assessment Program .............................. 28 D-2.1.2 OCHCA Bacteria Monitoring ........................................................... 32 D-2.1.3 Toxics Substances Monitoring Program and State Mussel Watch ........................................................................................................... 32 D-2.1.4 SCCWRP Bight Study ........................................................................ 34 D-2.1.5 Special Studies .................................................................................... 34 D-2.2 Assessment of Data and Studies .............................................................................. 34 D-2.3 Water Quality Status ................................................................................................. 40 D-2.3.1 Impaired Waters ................................................................................. 40 D-2.3.2 AB411 Summary ................................................................................. 43 D-2.3.3 Fecal Coliform TMDL Annual Report ............................................. 43 D-2.3.4 Sediment TMDL Annual Report ...................................................... 43 D-2.3.5 Nutrient TMDL Annual Report ....................................................... 44 D-2.4 Priority Water Quality Needs .................................................................................. 44 D-2.4.1 Pollutant Data Gaps ........................................................................... 46 D-2.4.2 Other Data Gaps ................................................................................. 51 D-3.0 TMDLs in the Watershed ........................................................................................................... 53 D-3.1 Existing TMDL Development .................................................................................. 54 D-3.1.1 Newport Bay - Fecal Coliform .......................................................... 54 D-3.1.2 Newport Bay & San Diego Creek – Nutrients ................................ 58 D-3.1.3 Newport Bay & San Diego Creek – Sediment ................................ 60 Proposed 2007 Drainage Area Management Plan D-1 July 2006 Newport Bay Watershed Action Plan APPENDIX D, NEWPORT BAY WATERSHED ACTION PLAN D-3.1.4 Newport Bay & San Diego Creek – Toxics ..................................... 62 D-3.1.5 Ongoing TMDL Studies .................................................................... 68 D-3.2 Status of Future TMDL Development .................................................................... 69 D-4.0 Pollution Source, Control and Treatment Inventories ........................................................... 72 D-4.1 Watershed Pollution Sources ................................................................................... 72 D-4.2 Existing Enhanced Non-Structural BMPs .............................................................. 72 D-4.3 Existing Structural Enhanced BMPs ....................................................................... 73 D-4.3.1 Sediment Trapping Basins ................................................................ 73 D-4.3.2 In-Channel Sediment Basins ............................................................. 73 D-4.3.3 San Joaquin Marsh ............................................................................. 74 D-4.3.4 Newport Dunes Sewer Diversion Project ....................................... 74 D-4.3.5 Serrano Creek Rehabilitation ............................................................ 74 D-4.3.6 Santa Ana Delhi Channel Trash Boom ............................................ 74 D-4.3.7 Warner Channel Nutrient BMP ........................................................ 74 D-4.4 Proposed Structural Enhanced BMPs ..................................................................... 75 D-4.4.1 Natural Treatment System ................................................................ 75 D-4.4.2 Newport Beach storm drain diversion projects ............................. 75 D-4.4.3 Big Canyon Creek Restoration ......................................................... 76 D-4.4.4 El Modena Irvine Channel-Peters Canyon Channel Trash Booms ........................................................................................................... 76 D-4.5 Estimates of Load Reductions of Existing BMPs................................................... 76 D-4.6 Recommendations for BMPs in the Watershed ..................................................... 77 D-5.0 Plan Development ....................................................................................................................... 80 D-6.0 Program Effectiveness Assessment .......................................................................................... 81 D-6.1 Short Term Strategy .................................................................................................. 81 D-6.2 Long-term Strategy .................................................................................................... 82 D-6.3 Review of Management Program ............................................................................ 82 D-7.0 References .................................................................................................................................... 83 Appendix ................................................................................................................................................... 89 Proposed 2007 Drainage Area Management Plan D-2 July 2006 Newport Bay Watershed Action Plan APPENDIX D, NEWPORT BAY WATERSHED ACTION PLAN LIST OF FIGURES Figure D-1 Location Map .................................................................................................................. 10 Figure D-2 Transportation ................................................................................................................ 12 Figure D-3a Unified School Districts................................................................................................. 13 Figure D-3b City Boundaries .............................................................................................................. 14 Figure D-3c Water Providers ............................................................................................................. 15 Figure D-3d Parks & Open Space ...................................................................................................... 16 Figure D-4 Land Use - Existing ........................................................................................................ 17 Figure D-5 Water Quality Planning Process .................................................................................. 24 Figure D-6. Newport Bay Watershed Processes. ............................................................................ 27 Figure D-7 Subwatersheds & Monitoring Locations .................................................................... 33 Figure D-8 Study Type Breakdown ................................................................................................. 38 Figure D-9 Receiving Waters............................................................................................................ 45 LIST OF TABLES Table D-1 Beneficial Uses – Newport Bay Watershed ................................................................ 19 Table D-2 Watershed Management Processes ............................................................................. 25 Table D-3 Assessment #1 - Studies by Program Management Category*. .............................. 36 Table D-4 Study Sources ................................................................................................................. 39 Table D-5 Constituent Focus of Studies and Programs .............................................................. 40 Table D-6 2002 303(d) List and TMDL Priority Schedule – Newport Bay Watershed ........... 42 Table D-7 Monitoring List for Newport Bay Watershed ............................................................ 43 Table
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5.4 Hydrology and Water Quality
    5.4 Hydrology and Water Quality City of Lake Forest Portola Center Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report 5.4 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section analyzes potential project impacts on existing drainage patterns, surface hydrology, and flood control facilities and water quality conditions in the project area. Mitigation measures are recommended to avoid potential impacts or reduce them to a less than significant level. The discussion in this section is based on information and conclusions contained in the following studies: . Hydrology Study for TTM 15353 & 17300 (Hydrology Study), prepared by Hunsaker & Associates Irvine, Inc., dated February 19, 2013; refer to Appendix 11.4, Hydrology and Water Quality Assessment. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for Portola Center Tentative Tract Map No. 15353 Lake Forest, CA (WQMP TTM 15353) prepared by Hunsaker and Associates Irvine, Inc., dated March 18, 2013; refer to Appendix 11.4, Hydrology and Water Quality Assessment. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for Portola Center Tentative Tract Map No. 17300 Lake Forest, CA (WQMP TTM 17300) prepared by Hunsaker and Associates Irvine, Inc., dated March 18, 2013; refer to Appendix 11.4, Hydrology and Water Quality Assessment. 5.4.1 EXISTING SETTING HYDROLOGY AND DRAINAGE CONDITIONS The project site is located within the Aliso Creek and San Diego Creek (also referred to as the Newport Bay) Watersheds. TTM 15353 is located completely within the Aliso Creek Watershed. A majority of TTM 17300 (approximately 98.1 acres) is located within the Aliso Creek Watershed and the remaining area (1.4 acres) is located within the San Diego Creek Watershed. More specifically, the 1.4 acres is in the Serrano Creek drainage area of Watershed F, San Diego Creek Subwatershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Facility Name
    Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Appendix G – Orange County Dams City of Newport Beach, California APPENDIX G: MAJOR DAMS IN ORANGE COUNTY Res. Drainage Crest Free Dam Dam National Latitude, Year Capacity Height Length Width Volume Owner Stream Area Area Elev. Board Type Comments Hazard Name No. ID Longitude Built (Ac-Ft) (Ft) (ft) (ft) (yd^3) (Acres) (mi^2) (ft) (ft) County of 33.688, Agua Chinon Agua Chinon 1012 -017 CA01361 Orange -117.7 Wash 1998 256 16 2.17 636 10.5 41 480 20 ERTH 176,000 Significant Bee Canyon Retention County of 33.708, Bee Canyon Basin 1012-009 CA01360 Orange -117.71 Wash 1994 243 14 1.29 581 11.5 62 570 25 ERTH 66,000 High City of 33.61, Tributary Big Big Canyon 1058-000 CA00891 Newport Beach -117.86 Canyon Cr 1959 600 22 0.04 308 5.5 65 3824 20 ERTH 508,000 High Bonita The Irvine 33.632, Canyon 793-004 CA00747 Company -117.848 Bonita Creek 1938 323 50 4.2 151 8 51 331 20 ERTH 43,000 Brea Dam (Brea Federal - 33.8917, Reservoir) CA10016 USCOE -117.925 Brea Creek 1942 4,018 162.7 22.0 295 16 87 1,765 20 ERTH 680,472 Carbon Federal - 33.915 Carbon Canyon CA10017 USCOE -117.6433 Canyon Creek 1961 7,033 221 19.3 499 24 99 2,610 20 ERTH 150,000 30 MG Central Reservoir 1087-000 CA01113 City of Brea Offstream 1924 92 5 0 392 30 1596 ERTH Metropolitan Water District 33.912, Diemer No.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.4 Biological Resources
    3.4 Biological Resources 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4.1 Introduction This section evaluates the potential for implementation of the Proposed Project to have impacts on biological resources, including sensitive plants, animals, and habitats. The Notice of Preparation (NOP) (Appendix A) identified the potential for impacts associated to candidate, sensitive, or special status species (as defined in Section 3.4.6 below), sensitive natural communities, jurisdictional waters of the United States, wildlife corridors or other significant migratory pathway, and a potential to conflict with local policies and ordinances protecting biological resources. Data used to prepare this section were taken from the Orange County General Plan, the City of Lake Forest General Plan, Lake Forest Municipal Code, field observations, and other sources, referenced within this section, for background information. Full bibliographic references are noted in Section 3.4.12 (References). No comments with respect to biological resources were received during the NOP comment period. The Proposed Project includes a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and zone change for development of Sites 1 to 6 and creation of public facilities overlay on Site 7. 3.4.2 Environmental Setting Regional Characteristics The City of Lake Forest, with a population of approximately 77,700 as of January 2004, is an area of 16.6 square miles located in the heart of South Orange County and Saddleback Valley, between the coastal floodplain and the Santa Ana Mountains (see Figure 2-1, Regional Location). The western portion of the City is near sea level, while the northeastern portion reaches elevations of up to 1,500 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Summaries
    Appendix A: Watershed Summaries Preface California’s watersheds supply water for drinking, recreation, industry, and farming and at the same time provide critical habitat for a wide variety of animal species. Conceptually, a watershed is any sloping surface that sheds water, such as a creek, lake, slough or estuary. In southern California, rapid population growth in watersheds has led to increased conflict between human users of natural resources, dramatic loss of native diversity, and a general decline in the health of ecosystems. California ranks second in the country in the number of listed endangered and threatened aquatic species. This Appendix is a “working” database that can be supplemented in the future. It provides a brief overview of information on the major hydrological units of the South Coast, and draws from the following primary sources: • The California Rivers Assessment (CARA) database (http://www.ice.ucdavis.edu/newcara) provides information on large-scale watershed and river basin statistics; • Information on the creeks and watersheds for the ESU of the endangered southern steelhead trout from the National Marine Fisheries Service (http://swr.ucsd.edu/hcd/SoCalDistrib.htm); • Watershed Plans from the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) that provide summaries of existing hydrological units for each subregion of the south coast (http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcbs/index.html); • General information on the ecology of the rivers and watersheds of the south coast described in California’s Rivers and Streams: Working
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego Creek Watershed Natural Treatment System Orange County, California
    San Diego Creek Watershed Natural Treatment System Orange County, California Environmental Assessment U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Southern California Area Office Temecula, California August 2009 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Cover Photo: San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary, Irvine, California by R.L. Kenyon, courtesy of Sea and Sage Audubon Society http://www.seaandsageaudubon.org/ Environmental Assessment San Diego Creek Watershed Natural Treatment System Project (SCH No. 2002021120) Irvine Ranch Water District, Orange County, California Prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2) (C), 16 U.S.C. 470, 49 U.S.C. 303 and 23 U.S.C. 138 for the Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA Cooperating Agency) and the Bureau of Reclamation (NEPA Lead Agency) August 2009 Based on information provided by Bonterra Consulting 151 Kalmus Drive, Suite E-200 Costa Mesa, California 92626 The following people may be contacted for information concerning this document: Cheryl McGovern Doug McPherson Environmental Protection Agency Bureau of Reclamation 75 Hawthorne Street, WTR-3 27708 Jefferson Ave.,
    [Show full text]
  • PETERS CANYON REGIONAL PARK General Development Plan
    PETERS CANYON REGIONAL PARK General Development Plan July 2019 Peters Canyon Regional Park – View of Multi-UseTrail PETERS CANYON REGIONAL PARK General Development Plan APPROVED September 2019 Orange County Board of Supervisors Andrew Do Michelle Steel Donald P. Wagner First District Second District Third District Doug Chaffee Lisa A. Bartlett Fourth District Fifth District County of Orange OC Community Resources Dylan Wright Director OC Parks Stacy Blackwood Director Scott Thomas Tuan Richardson Planning & Design Project Manager Manager Peters Canyon Regional Park – View of Upper Peters Canyon Reservoir PETERS CANYON REGIONAL PARK General Development Plan July 2019 Prepared for OC Parks Headquarters Irvine Ranch Historic Park 13042 Old Myford Road Irvine, CA 92602 www.ocparks.com Prepared by Peters Canyon Regional Park – View of Multi-Use Trail Acknowledgments OC Parks Commission David Hanson Joe Muller John Koos Duy Nguyen Warren Kusumoto Michael Posey Justin McCusker Project Team OC Parks Stacy Blackwood, Director Environmental Review and CEQA Documentation Bill Reiter, Park District Manager Chambers Group, Inc. Scott Thomas, Manager, Planning and Design Lisa Louie, Senior Project Manager / Biologist Tuan Richardson, Project Manager, Planning and Design Meghan Gibson, Senior Environmental Planner / Katrina Chase, Project Assistant, Planning and Design Project Manager Steve Jax, Senior Park Ranger Eunice Bagwan, Assistant Environmental Planner Jim Simkins, Supervising Park Ranger Greg Tonkovich, Air and Noise Analyst Jacky Cordero, Operations
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL PLAN APPENDIX December 2012 TABLE of CONTENTS
    County of Orange GENERAL PLAN APPENDIX December 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LAND USE ELEMENT Appendix III-1 Growth Management Program Guidelines …………………………………………… 1 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Appendix IV-1 Growth Management Transportation Implementation Manual ……………………… 9 Appendix IV-2 Planning Criteria for Determining Arterial Highway Classifications ……………….. 30 Appendix IV-3 Bikeway Designation Planning Guidelines ………………………………………….. 36 Appendix IV-4 County Designation Scenic Highways and Candidate Corridors ……………………. 38 Appendix IV-5 Scenic Highways Corridor Implementation Planning Guidelines …………………… 44 Appendix IV-6 List of Acronyms/Abbreviations …………………………………………………….. 48 RESOURCES ELEMENT Appendix VI-1 List of Acronyms/Abbreviations …………………………………………………….. 56 RECREATION ELEMENT Appendix VII-1 Local Park Implementation Plan Criteria: Private Parks, Facilities and Improvements 60 Appendix VII-2 Local Park Guidelines: Site Characteristics, Acquisition, Design, Maintenance & Funding 66 Appendix VII-3 Local Park Site Criteria ……………………………………………………………… 75 Appendix VII-4 Policy for Allocating Funds for Trail Development ………………………………… 81 Appendix VII-5 Trail Descriptions …………………………………………………………………… 85 Appendix VII-6 Staging Areas ……………………………………………………………………….. 109 Appendix VII-7 Trail Design Standards ……………………………………………………………… 115 Appendix VII-8 Regional Recreation Facilities Inventory …………………………………………… 119 Appendix VII-9 List of Acronyms/Abbreviations ……………………………………………………. 129 NOISE ELEMENT Appendix VIII-1 Noise Element Definitions and Acronyms …………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • List of Birding Locations
    2015 Orange County Spring Count Locations Birded Locations marked with a (G) were counted by multiple teams covering different trails. The results were combined on the spreadsheet. Aliso and Wood Canyons Wilderness Park Magnolia Marsh US-CA-Huntington Beach Army Corps of Engineers Salt Marsh Maple Springs Visitor Center to Lower Halfway Arovista Park Road Arroyo Elementary School Marina View Park Arroyo Trabuco Golf Course Mason Park (G) Batavia x LaVeta Mile Square Regional Park Bolsa Chica (G) My Huntington Harbour Neighborhood Bell View Trail--Rancho Santa Margarita NE Newport Back Bay (G) Blue Jay Campground Newport Pier Bommer Canyon NWS Seal Beach (restricted access) Booster Park Oak Canyon Nature Center Brier Ln., Lemon Heights Oak Lane Bridge Brookhurst Marsh Offshore (ORA Co.) Canyon Park O'Neill Regional Park Carbon Canyon Regional Park Optics4Birding Caspers Wilderness Park Orchard Hills Craig Regional Park Peachwood Crescent Bay Point Park Personal Spot - Home Crystal Cove SP--beach area Peter's Canyon Bike Trail by Harvard Park Dana Point (G) Peters Canyon Creek Davenport channel Peters Canyon Regional Park Dilley Preserve Pinecrest Park El Toro Marine Corps Air Station Quail Hill Preserve El Toro Memorial Park Ralph B. Clark Regional Park Fairview Park Ramakrishna Monastery Fullerton Arboretum Rattlesnake Reservoir Gilman Park Reservoir Rd. loop Harbour View Park San Diego Creek Trail--north of Hwy 405 Heisler Park San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary (G) Hicks Haul Road, Portola to Augustine Ranch San Juan Trailhead Home neighborhood Santa Ana River--Pacific Coast Hwy to Huntington Beach Pier Hamilton Ave. Huntington Central Park (G) Santiago drainage pond Irvine Lake Serrano Creek Park Irvine RP (G) Shaw's Cove Irvine Valley College Silverado Cyn (G) (private roads) Irvine, Shady Canyon Trail Bikeway Starr Ranch La Vereda Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • [Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Project Title]
    2001 Annual Report Prepared by: Nature Reserve of Orange County And LSA Associates, Inc. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE RESOURCE AGENCIES INTRODUCTION The Nature Reserve of Orange County (NROC) has prepared this annual report for the year 2001 consistent with Section 5.1.4 of the Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP) Central/Coastal Implementation Agreement (IA). The preparation and submittal of this annual report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) satisfies this requirement. 1.0 MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1.1 Monitoring NROC began and continued a number of monitoring projects. In an effort to establish baseline data and help assess the health of the Reserve lands (the land managed by NROC), the projects include the monitoring of vegetation, wildlife, and invasion by exotic plant species. These monitoring programs included the following: Monitoring Program for Mammalian Carnivores and Deer Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) Program California Gnatcatcher and Cactus Wren Monitoring for the San Joaquin Hills Burn Area Reptile and Amphibian Monitoring at Long-Term Biodiversity Monitoring Stations Brown-Headed Cowbird Trapping Program in the San Joaquin Hills Pitfall Trapping of Ants at the Biodiversity Monitoring Stations Target Bird and Cowbird Monitoring Program Raptor Nest and Territory Monitoring Program 1.2 Restoration/Enhancement NROC has continued its effort to restore and enhance habitat throughout the Reserve, including approximately 2,100 acres of artichoke thistle and 30 acres of veldtgrass control, as well as native topsoil and plant salvage from Shady Canyon and relocation in Bommer Canyon. NROC is also in the process of developing an overall Reserve-wide restoration plan based on the mapping of exotic vegetation and prioritizing restoration opportunities based on specific criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Phase I Cultural Resources
    Smith Basin Improvement Project Appendix D Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Smith Basin Rehabilitation Project, City of Orange, California, VCS Environmental, January 2019 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE SMITH BASIN REHABILITATION PROJECT CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA Prepared For Greg Woodside Executive Director of Planning and Natural Resources Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Prepared By Patrick O. Maxon, M.A., RPA VCS Environmental 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 [email protected] January 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page National Archaeological Database (NADB) Information Sheet ................................................ S-1 Management Summary ........................................................................................................... S-2 1.0 Undertaking Information/Introduction ........................................................................ 1 1.1 Area of Potential Effects ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Description .............................................................................................. 1 1.3 Project Personnel................................................................................................ 4 2.0 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Federal ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation
    CHAPTER 9 CONSERVATION The City’s natural resources form an important part of its unique character This Chapter includes the following topics: and quality of life. In Lake Forest, these resources include the City’s biological resources, geology and soils, mineral and energy resources, hydrology and 9.1 Biological Resources water quality, visual resources, and cultural resources. 9.2 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity 9.1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 9.3 Mineral and Energy Resources This section describes biological resources in the City of Lake Forest from both a qualitative and quantitative perspective. The results of this assessment may 9.4 Hydrology and Water Quality be used in planning and management decisions that may affect biological resources in the City of Lake Forest. 9.5 Cultural Resources Key Terms The following key terms are used throughout this section to describe biological Figures are located at the end of resources and the framework that regulates them: the Chapter. Hydric Soils. One of the three wetland identification parameters, according to the Federal definition of a wetland, hydric soils have characteristics that indicate they were developed in conditions where soil oxygen is limited by the presence of saturated soil for long periods during the growing season. There are approximately 2,000 named soils in the United States that may occur in wetlands. Hydrophytic Vegetation. Plant types that typically occur in wetland areas. CONSERVATION / 9-1 6 3 MARKET DEMAND Nearly 5,000 plant types in the United States may occur in wetlands. Plants are listed in regional publications of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and include such species as cattails, bulrushes, cordgrass, sphagnum moss, bald cypress, willows, mangroves, sedges, rushes, arrowheads, and water plantains.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego Creek Newport Bay Santiago Creek Santa Ana Riv Er
    Coyote Creek Santa Ana River Santiago Creek San Diego Creek Newport Bay THE OC PLAN Integrated Regional Water Management for the North and Central Orange County Watershed Management Areas March 2018 The OC Plan Contacts County of Orange Orange County Watersheds Orange County Department of Public Works 2301 N. Glassell Street Orange, California 92865 www.ocwatersheds.com Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, California 92708 (714) 378-8248 www.ocwd.com Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 (714) 962-2411 www.ocsd.com March 2018 The OC PLAN for IRWM in North and Central Orange County TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................. TOC-1 LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... AC-1 1 REGIONAL PLANNING, OUTREACH, GOVERNANCE AND COORDINATION........................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 History of Integrated Regional Water Management Planning in the North and Central Orange County Watershed Management Areas ...................................................................................... 1-5 1.3 IRWM Plan Development and Governance .................................................................................. 1-7
    [Show full text]