DOCSLIB.ORG

Joint Damage and Needs Assessment Report on Earthquake, Kagera Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

JOINT DAMAGE AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT ON EARTHQUAKE, KAGERA REGION 26 SEPTEMBER 2016 1. REFERENCE MAP 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. REFERENCE MAP ............................................................................................................................ 2 2. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 4 3. IMPACT OF THE CRISIS ................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Drivers of the emergency ........................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Assessment Objective and Methodology ............................................................................. 5 3.3 Scope ......................................................................................................................................... 7 3.6 Damage ..................................................................................................................................... 9 4. ASSESSMENT OF DISTRICTS .......................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Bukoba ..................................................................................................................................... 11 4.1.1 Bukoba Urban ..................................................................................................................... 11 4.3 Kyerwa .................................................................................................................................... 19 4.4 Karagwe .................................................................................................................................. 21 4.5 Muleba ..................................................................................................................................... 23 5. SECTORAL ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................... 24 5.1 Shelter and NFIs ...................................................................................................................... 24 5.2 Education ............................................................................................................................... 24 5.3 Protection ............................................................................................................................... 25 5.4 WASH ............................................................................................................................................. 26 5.5 Food and Nutrition ................................................................................................................. 26 5.6 Livelihood and Agriculture .................................................................................................... 27 5.7 Health ...................................................................................................................................... 27 5.8 Humanitarian Access ............................................................................................................ 28 6. RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................................................................... 29 6.1 Shelter and NFIs ....................................................................................................................... 29 6.2 Education ............................................................................................................................... 30 6.3 Protection ............................................................................................................................... 30 6.4 WASH ............................................................................................................................................. 31 6.5 Food and Nutrition .................................................................................................................. 31 6.6 Livelihood and Agriculture .................................................................................................... 31 6.7 Health ............................................................................................................................................ 32 6.8 Communication ..................................................................................................................... 32 6.9 Coordination .......................................................................................................................... 32 ANNEX I. Most affected wards in terms of shelter in Bukoba Municipal ...................................... 33 ANNEX II. Most affected wards in terms of shelter in Bukoba Rural District ................................. 34 ANNEX III. Most affected wards in terms of shelter in Missenyi District .......................................... 35 ANNEX IV. Most affected wards in terms of damages to classrooms in Bukoba Municipal District ................................................................................................................................................... 36 ANNEX V. Most affected wards in terms of damages to classrooms in Bukoba Rural District .. 37 ANNEX VI. Most affected wards in terms of damages to classrooms in Missenyi District........... 38 ANNEX VII. List of Assessment Team Members ................................................................................ 39 ANNEX VIII. List of people interviewed ............................................................................................. 40 Annex IX. Relief Received and Distributed by Kageral Region Disaster Management Committee .......................................................................................................................................... 44 3 2. INTRODUCTION The Joint Damage and Needs Assessment Report is the outcome of the request from the Prime Minister’s Office to the United Nation Resident Coordinator in Tanzania to support the government in various areas on emergency response following the devastating earthquake which occurred in Kagera region on 10 September, 2016. This was a follow up of the intention expressed by the Resident Coordinator for the UN Agencies readiness to be part of the assessment team during the fund raising event led by the Prime Minister of the United Republic of Tanzania on 13 September, 2016 in Dar es Salaam. A request for assistance was sent to the United Nation Resident Coordinator by the Government on 15 September, 2016 covering the following: i. Participation of UN Agencies and deployment of UNDAC Team for Damage and Need Assessment and strengthen of coordination mechanism; ii. Provision of food, non-food items, shelter and medical services; and iii. Assist in long term recovery and rehabilitation in build back better. This assessment was carried out by a joint team composed of representatives of the Government, UN agencies, UNDAC Team and members of the Local and International Organisations, under the coordination of the Prime Minister’s Office – Disaster Management Department. The draft assessment report was presented to the Kagera Region Disaster Management Committee on 26 September, 2016. The Committee got the opportunity to discuss key findings and shared their views which were considered in the final report. As a joint report Brig. Gen. MA Msuya, Director Disaster – Management Department and Mrs. Hanane Babikir, Assessment Leader UN Assessment Leader agreed with the content herein. Set up of an Emergence Operation and Coordination Centers at the Regional Commissioner’s Office with members from Disaster Management Department and the Regional Administrative Secretariat Office serve a key role in assisting various data and information to the assessment team. This coordination mechanism helps to easier the coordination among partners involved in response to avoid duplication of efforts. 4 3. IMPACT OF THE CRISIS 3.1 Drivers of the emergency On Saturday 10th September 2016 at 15h27 local time (12h27 GMT), an earthquake of 5.9 magnitude hit North West Tanzania, at about 44 km from Bukoba town on the western shore of Lake Victoria, in Kagera region. The earthquake struck near Ngunga town at a depth of 40 kilometres. As a result of the earthquake, a total of 17 people died, 440 were injured, out of which 252 were hospitalized while 12 are still in hospitals. A stronger aftershock was felt in Bukoba at 22h15 on 11th September but there are no reports of further damaged caused by this. Although earthquakes occur rarely in Tanzania, activities are common along the great East African Rift Valley corridor, which traverses the country forming eastern and western rift valley branches. The region is predominantly rural, completely land-locked and remote from the coast and capital, and largely dependent on agriculture. Agricultural production engages about 75 percent of the regional population in the production of food and cash crops1. The region has been undergoing a prolonged drought and the earthquake has compounded the risk of food shortages and seed scarcity. The material used for buildings in the affected districts contributed to the vulnerability of the households and their limited resilience to the impact of the earthquake. Majority of the buildings were built with mud bricks and mud found in the natural environment without concrete pillars or raft concrete foundation
Recommended publications
  • Water Purification with a Biosand Filter in Tanzania: a Minor Field Study - Karagwe District, Tanzania

    Water Purification with a Biosand Filter in Tanzania: a Minor Field Study - Karagwe District, Tanzania

    Projektarbete 15 hp June 2016 Water purification with a biosand filter in Tanzania: A minor field study - Karagwe District, Tanzania Johanna Gjerstad Lindgren Zarah Olivecrona Abstract In Karagwe district in northwest Tanzania, the non-governmental organisation Mavuno is working with water scarcity and drinking-water quality issues within the local community. Mavuno started a boarding school for girls in Chonyonyo village in the district in January 2016. The school is self-sufficient of water and relies on rainwater as a raw water source. The main objective of this study was to investigate water purification with a biosand filter, built of local materials at the Chonyonyo school. The filter performance was analysed by studying the reduction of indicator organisms in the filtered water. The knowledge obtained should be transferred to employees at Mavuno, allowing them to independently operate the biosand filter and analyse the water quality. The study was done as a Minor field study with support from SIDA, in collaboration with Swedish Engineers without borders and Mavuno. The study includes a literature review and a field study where a biosand filter was built and tested. After construction, the biosand filter was operated for 6 weeks during which water samples were collected and analysed. Water samples were collected from the influent raw rainwater and effluent filtered water. The microbial properties of the water samples were investigated by analysis of the indicator organisms total coliform bacteria, e.coli and enterococci. The analysis was performed with the QuantiTray-2000® and most probable number (MPN) method from IDEXX Laboratories. Additionally, temperature and pH was measured on all water samples.
  • Environmental-And-Social-Impact-Assessment-For-The-Rehabilitation-Of-Lusahunga

    Environmental-And-Social-Impact-Assessment-For-The-Rehabilitation-Of-Lusahunga

    UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF WORKS, TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATION Public Disclosure Authorized APRIL 2020 Tanzania National Roads Agency (TANROADS) 3rd Floor, 10 Shaaban Robert Road/Garden Avenue Junction P. O. Box 11364, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Tel: + 255 22 2926001-6 Fax: + 255 22 2926011 Public Disclosure Authorized E-Mail: [email protected] ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED REHABILITATION OF LUSAHUNGA – RUSUMO ROAD (92KM) TO BITUMEN STANDARD Public Disclosure Authorized Submitted to: National Environment Management Council (NEMC) Regent Estate Plot No. 29/30, P. O. Box 63154 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Tel: +255 22 2774852 22 2774889/713 Fax: Fax +255 22 277 4901 E-mail: [email protected] Prepared by: Public Disclosure Authorized Dr. Rubhera R.A.M Mato. P. O. Box 35176, Dar es Salaam, Tel: +255 754 898592; E-mail: [email protected] ESIA Report for Lusahunga – Rusumo (92 Km) Road April, 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The proponent and the ESIA Team wish to express thanks and appreciation to all stakeholders who in one way or the other supported completion of this work. Special thanks to the Ngara and Biharamulo District Councils as well as Kagera Regional Secretariat Officials for their prompt assistance during the fieldwork. We are also thankful to the Engineering Design Team and other team members of the Consultant for their technical inputs. Last but not least, we thank the leadership of Ward Leaders and Local Communities in the project area for their cooperation and participation in the ESIA exercise. i | P a g e ESIA Report for Lusahunga – Rusumo (92 Km) Road April, 2020 STUDY TEAM Consultant’s Team for preparation of ESIA Environmentalist and ESIA Dr.
  • The United Republic of Tanzania

    The United Republic of Tanzania

    Strategic Plan Document 2016/2017 to 2020/2021 THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT KYERWA DISTRICT COUNCIL COUNCIL FIVE YEARS STRATEGIC PLAN 2016/2017 – 2020/2021 DISTRICT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, P. O. BOX 72, KYERWA TEL: +255 686 397 972 + 255 754 422 746 Email: [email protected] 0 Strategic Plan Document 2016/2017 to 2020/2021 CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.0: Statement of the Council Chairperson ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.2: Statement of the Council Director ........................................................................................................................... 6 Challenges and Obstacles: .............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.3: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.5: Purpose of the five years Strategic Development Plan (2016/2017 - 2020/2021) .................................................... 9 1.6: Mandate of the Council as stipulated
  • World Vision INVITATION for TENDER TENDER FOR

    World Vision INVITATION for TENDER TENDER FOR

    World Vision INVITATION FOR TENDER TENDER FOR CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLY OF GOODS TENDER No. WVT/TC/03/2021 World Vision Tanzania (WVT) is a Christian relief, development and advocacy Organization, dedicated to working with Children, families and Communities to overcome poverty and injustice. Inspired by our Christian values, we are dedicated to working with the world’s most vulnerable people_ We serve all people regardless of religion, race, ethnicity or gender. 1. The World Vision Tanzania -Head office Arusha invites sealed tenders from eligible Contractor class six and above (class 1 to 6) Registered by CRB-Tanzania (Local Contractor Categories) in Civil -for construction of water supply projects, building projects and drilling of Boreholes_ These works shall be executed in Kagera, Tanga, Dodoma, Simiyu, Arusha and Manyara Regions. Also bidders are invited to submit their bids for supply of beehive kit and its accessories. 2. The Scope of work involves Construction of water supply projects, construction of Buildings (Classrooms, Latrines at schools and Supply of beehive kit and its accessories. 3. Site visits for all construction related works shall be conducted as per schedule shown in the tender documents. CATEGORY A: CONSTRUCTION WORKS 1. Lot 1: Rukoma & Bushangaro Aps Water Projects; -Construction of Nsheshe Water Project -Rukoma· AP -Bukoba District -Kagera Region. -Construction of 10 distribution point at Kamagambo water project bushangaro-Karagwe District- Bushangaro AP-Kagera Region 2. Lot II: lzigo and Mbuka Aps Water projects; -Construction of Kimbugu water project at lzigo Ap-Muleba District Council -Construction of Water project at Bisheke village in Mbuka Ap -Muleba District Council.
  • LAKE VICTORIA Commercial Agriculture –Especiallycoffee Andcotton–Are Increasingly Important

    LAKE VICTORIA Commercial Agriculture –Especiallycoffee Andcotton–Are Increasingly Important

    © Lonely Planet Publications 240 Lake Victoria LAKE VICTORIA Lake Victoria is Africa’s largest lake, and the second-largest freshwater lake in the world. While the Tanzanian portion sees only a trickle of tourists, the region holds many attractions for those who have a bent for the offbeat and who want to immerse themselves in the rhythms of local life. At the Bujora Cultural Centre near Mwanza, you can learn Sukuma dancing and get acquainted with the culture of Tanzania’s largest tribal group. Further north at Butiama is the Nyerere museum, an essential stop for anyone interested in the great statesman. Musoma and Bukoba – both with a sleepy, waterside charm – are ideal places for getting a taste of lakeshore life. Bukoba is also notable as the heartland of the Haya people, who had one of the most highly developed early societies on the continent. Mwanza, to the southeast, is Tanzania’s second largest city after Dar es Salaam, and an increasingly popular jumping off point for safaris into the Serengeti’s Western Corridor. To the southwest is Rubondo Island National Park for bird-watching and relaxing. The best way to explore the lake region is as part of a larger loop combining Uganda and/or Kenya with Tanzania’s northern circuit via the western Serengeti, although you’ll need time, and a tolerance for rough roads. While most accommodation is no-frills, there are a few idyllic getaways – notably on Rubondo and Lukuba Islands, and near Mwanza. Most locals you’ll meet rely on fishing and small-scale farming for their living, although industry and commercial agriculture – especially coffee and cotton – are increasingly important.
  • Managing Risk and Reducing Vulnerability of Agricultural Systems Under Variable and Changing Climate

    Managing Risk and Reducing Vulnerability of Agricultural Systems Under Variable and Changing Climate

    Country Report: Tanzania Managing Risk and Reducing Vulnerability of Agricultural Systems under Variable and Changing Climate Soil-Water Management Research Programme Sokoine University of Agriculture September 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................................................................ ii List of Tables ................................................................................................................. ii List of Photos ................................................................................................................. ii List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... v Acknowledgement ..................................................................................................... viii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 2. Country Background .............................................................................................. 2 2.1 Geographical Location ................................................................................... 2 2.2 Climate ........................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Temperature pattern ..............................................................................
  • Tanzania 2016 International Religious Freedom Report

    Tanzania 2016 International Religious Freedom Report

    TANZANIA 2016 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitutions of the union government and of the semiautonomous government in Zanzibar both prohibit religious discrimination and provide for freedom of religious choice. Three individuals were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for the arson of a church in Kagera. A Christian bishop in Dar es Salaam was arrested and accused of sedition for speaking on political matters from the pulpit. The church’s license was withheld while police continued to investigate at year’s end. The president and prime minister, along with local government officials, emphasized peace and religious tolerance through dialogue with religious leaders. Prime Minister Kassim Majaliwa addressed an interfaith iftar in July, noting his appreciation for religious leaders using their place of worship to preach tolerance, peace, and harmony. In May 15 masked assailants bombarded and attacked individuals at the Rahmani Mosque, killing three people, including the imam, and injuring several others. Arsonists set fire to three churches within four months in the Kagera Region, where church burning has been a recurring concern of religious leaders. The police had not arrested any suspects by the end of the year. Civil society groups continued to promote peaceful interactions and religious tolerance. The U.S. embassy began implementing a program to counter violent extremism narratives and strengthen the framework for religious tolerance. A Department of State official visited the country to participate in a conference of Anglican leaders on issues of religious freedom and relations between Christians and Muslims. Embassy officers continued to advocate for religious peace and tolerance in meetings with religious leaders in Zanzibar.
  • Tanzania MFR Summary Report

    Tanzania MFR Summary Report

    TANZANIA August 20, 2018 Market Fundamentals Summary KEY MESSAGES The objective of this report is to document the basic market context Figure 1. Map of Tanzania for staple food and livestock production and marketing in Tanzania. The information presented is based on desk research, a field assessment using rapid rural appraisal techniques, and a consultation workshop with stakehoders in Tanzania. Findings from this report will inform regular market monitoring and analysis in Tanzania. Maize, rice, sorghum, millet, pulses (beans and peas), cassava and bananas (plantains) are the main staple foods in Tanzania. Maize is the most widely consumed staple in Tanzania and the country imports significant quantities of wheat to meet local demand for wheat flour. Consumption of other staples varies across the country based on local supply and demand dynamics. Cattle, goat and sheep are the major sources of red meat consumed in Tanzania. Tanzania’s cropping calendar follows two distinct seasonal patterns. The Msimu season covers unimodal rainfall areas in the south, west and central parts of the country while the Masika and Vuli seasons Source: FEWS NET (2018). cover bi-modal rainfall areas in the north and eastern parts of the country (Figure 5). Figure 2. Tanzania’s average self sufficiency status for key staple foods (2014/15 – 2017/18) As a member of the East Africa Community (EAC) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC), Tanzania plays an important role in regional staple food trade across East and Southern Africa (Annex III). The country is generally a surplus producer of staple cereals and pulses, and exports significant quantities of these commodities to neighboring countries in East and Southern Africa inlcuding Kenya, Malawi, Zambia, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi and the Democratice Republic of Congo (Figure 2).
  • Impact of Policy and Legal Reforms on a Pastoral System in Lower Kagera Sub-Basin, North Western Tanzania

    Impact of Policy and Legal Reforms on a Pastoral System in Lower Kagera Sub-Basin, North Western Tanzania

    Impact of Policy and Legal Reforms on a Pastoral System in Lower Kagera Sub-Basin, North Western Tanzania Lwekaza J. A. Kisoza The Open University of Tanzania Institute of Continuing Education Email: [email protected] Abstract: A socio-economic study was conducted in the lower Kagera sub-basin in North Western Tanzania to assess the impact of land-use policies and legal reformson pastoral system. Questionnaire surveys and PRA approaches were employed to collect data in four districts: Muleba, Missenyi, Karagwe and Ngara in Kagera region. The main economic activities in the study area were small hold farming (74%), agro-pastoralism (48%) and pastoralism (4%). The majority own between 1 and 2 acres of land, held under customary regimes (60.3. There were experienced increasing land shortages (69.2%) mainly attributed to unfavourable legal and policy framework (96.4%). The main constraint faced by pastoralists was shortage of grazing land (52.9%). The structures established to administer land resources and resolve land-use conflicts were reported to be ineffectual. The area is facing increasing land-use conflicts that involve farmers against pastoralists, farmers against farmers, farmers against investors, and farmer against government agencies. A number of newly introduced policies and laws aiming at commercialization of pastoral system had led to expropriation of customary lands to new investors. The pastoral systems are now on transition, and increasingly becoming sedentarized. There are emerging commercial investors who were partitioning communal grazing lands and converting them into commercial ranches. In order to cope with changes it is recommended the interventions that will intensify the pastoral system by increasing both rangeland and livestock productivity and ensure sustainable rangeland health in Kagera sub- basin.
  • Measuring Access to Food in Tanzania: a Food Basket Approach, EIB-135, U.S

    Measuring Access to Food in Tanzania: a Food Basket Approach, EIB-135, U.S

    United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Measuring Access to Food Service Economic in Tanzania: A Food Basket Information Bulletin Number 135 Approach February 2015 Nancy Cochrane and Anna D’Souza United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service www.ers.usda.gov Access this report online: www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib135 Download the charts contained in this report: • Go to the report’s index page www.ers.usda.gov/publications/ eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib135 • Click on the bulleted item “Download eib135.zip” • Open the chart you want, then save it to your computer Recommended citation format for this publication: Cochrane, Nancy, and Anna D’Souza. Measuring Access to Food in Tanzania: A Food Basket Approach, EIB-135, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, February 2015. Cover images: Nancy Cochrane, USDA, Economic Research Service. Use of commercial and trade names does not imply approval or constitute endorsement by USDA. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C.
  • Wasi-Hng Slabs, Washing Habits and Washing Sites in the Lake Zone Regions

    Wasi-Hng Slabs, Washing Habits and Washing Sites in the Lake Zone Regions

    RARY 824 TZLA92 ER(;Ar~~L FEQ~~’F FOR CDM~L~1T~/~ ~-_ CENTRE SANITATI~ ~ ~ SUPPLY AIsJO WASI-HNG SLABS, WASHING HABITS AND WASHING SITES IN THE LAKE ZONE REGIONS Final report by the anthropological consultant to HESAWA /i ~p :~j~ 2,/ S February 25, 1992 Bernhard Helander Department of Cultural Anthropology University of Uppsala Tradgardsgat.an 18 S-753 09 Uppsala Sweden 824—TZLA—10573 * ‘.4 4 it . 2 Table of Contents Summary 3 Introduction 4 Study design and methods 5 The districts studied 8 Why washing slabs’~ 9 How the reasons for washing slabs are understood 10 in the villages 10 Washing habits 13 The different designs of washing slabs 18 Discussion of the different types of washing slabs 20 Washing sites and water sources 21 The planning process and the backlog in production 22 Recommendations 23 Appendix 1 The sample of households 25 Appendix 2 Terms of Reference 26 Appendix 3 Correspendence 28 Appendix 4 Field agenda and list of questions 29 Appendix 5 Day by day 33 Appendix 6 Persons contacted 34 Appendix 7 Sketch of washing slab in Kwimba 37 Appendix 8 A sample of maps of water sources, produced by villagers in Magu district 38 L~BR‘RY, NTE1~\ T~fl~’~L REFERE~’OE ~LY ~D T~i~‘‘. — ~ ~8~+ ZL/~3~ I . Summary This report deals with two sets of problems that have emerged with the introduction of washing slabs in the HESAWA programme. Firstly, while villages and districts have planned for washing slabs to be constructed in their annual budgets and have had these budgets approved, few washing slabs have actually been built.
  • Lake Victoria Experience and Lessons Learned Brief

    Lake Victoria Experience and Lessons Learned Brief

    Lake Victoria Experience and Lessons Learned Brief Sixtus Kayombo*, Dar es Salaam University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, [email protected] Sven Erik Jorgensen, Royal Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark * Corresponding author 1. Introduction fl ushing time is 123 years. Because of its long retention time, pollutants entering the lake remain in it for a long time. Lake Victoria is the second largest freshwater lake in the world by area (Figure 1), and has the world’s largest freshwater Domestic and industrial wastewater, solid wastes, sediments fi shery, largely based on the introduced of Nile perch, which from soil erosion in the catchment area, agricultural wastes supports an economically and socially important export fi shery and atmospheric deposition are the major nutrient sources for the riparian countries. The lake basin supports about 30 to the lake. Parts of Lake Victoria, especially the deeper million people and is the source of the Nile River. The threats areas, are now considered dead zones, unable to sustain life facing the lake include eutrophication, over-exploitation of due to oxygen defi ciency in the water. The threats facing the fi sheries, introduced exotic species, and climate change. The lake have caused considerable hardship for the populations population in the catchment is growing rapidly, with the lake dependent on it for their livelihoods, and also have reduced itself attracting people because of the economic opportunities the biodiversity of the lake’s fauna, most notably the it offers. The lake’s water residence time is 23 years, while its phytoplankton and fi sh.