DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Applications Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Applications Committee PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Wednesday, 16th June, 2021 10.00 am Council Chamber, Sessions House, County Hall, Maidstone AGENDA PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Wednesday, 16th June, 2021, at 10.00 am Ask for: Andrew Tait Council Chamber, Sessions House, County Telephone: 03000 416749 Hall, Maidstone Membership (13) Conservative (10): Mr R A Marsh (Chairman), Mr C Beart, Mrs R Binks, Mr A Booth, Mr P Cole, Mr D Crow-Brown, Mr M Dendor, Mr O Richardson, Mr C Simkins and Mr J Wright Liberal Democrat (1): Mr I S Chittenden Labour (1) Ms J Meade Independents (1) Mr P M Harman Webcasting Notice Please note: this meeting may be filmed for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council’s internet site – at the start of the meeting the Chairman will confirm if all or part of the meeting is being filmed. By entering the meeting room you are consenting to being filmed and to the possible use of those images and sound recordings for webcasting and/or training purposes. If you do not wish to have your image captured then you should make the Clerk of the meeting aware. UNRESTRICTED ITEMS (During these items the meeting is likely to be open to the public A. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Substitutes 2. Declarations of Interests by Members in items on the Agenda for this meeting. 3. Election of Vice-Chairman 4. Terms of Reference of the Committee A4 Planning Applications Committee Membership: 13 Members - Conservative: 10, Labour :1 Liberal Democrat: 1, Green and Independents: 1. This Committee is responsible for the determination of planning applications and related matters in relation to the control of development under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and related statutory instruments and may exercise any of the powers of the County Council so delegated as set out in the Delegation Table. The Planning Applications Committee may permit members of the public interested in their decisions to address their meetings, in accordance with the principles of decision-making set out in paragraph 8.5 of the Constitution. Political Groups should only nominate Members as regular Members or as substitutes on the Planning Applications Committees (and on any Panels of the Committee) if they have had training in the relevant procedures. The votes of each individual Member of the Planning Applications Committee (whether for, against, or in abstention) will be recorded whenever the Committee votes against the Head of Planning Applications Group’s recommendation for permission or refusal of a planning application, together with the grounds and reasons for overturning the recommendation.” 5. Minutes (Pages 1 - 10) (1) 9 March 2021 (2) 17 March 2021 6. Site Meetings and Other Meetings B. GENERAL MATTERS 1. General Matters C. MINERALS AND WASTE APPLICATIONS D. DEVELOPMENTS TO BE CARRIED OUT BY THE COUNTY COUNCIL 1. Proposal 21/501778/County (KCC/MA/0071/2021) - Erection of new build facility for provision of digital autopsy services to Kent County Council/Coroner's Service at County Transport Workshops, Forstal Road/Beddow Way, Aylesford; Kent County Council (Pages 11 - 34) E. MATTERS DEALT WITH UNDER DELEGATED POWERS 1. County matter applications (Pages 35 - 44) 2. County Council developments 3. Screening opinions under Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 4. Scoping opinions under Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 F. KCC RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS 1. Dartford Borough Council Local Plan Regulation 19 Draft (Pages 45 - 62) 2. Hybrid Application at Albion Waterside, Canal Basin, Gravesend, Kent DA12 2RN (20210270) (Pages 63 - 108) 3. EIA Scoping Opinion for a proposed development at Land North of Marden Maidstone Road, Marden, Kent [application reference: 21/501909/EIASCO] (Pages 109 - 142) 4. EIA Scoping Opinion for a mixed-use development at Highsted Park Land to the West Of Teynham London Road Teynham Kent [Application reference 21/500836/EIASCO] (Pages 143 - 170) 5. Swale Borough Local Plan Review (Regulation 19) - February 2021 (Pages 171 - 192) 6. Boughton and Dunkirk Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 14 Consultation (Pages 193 - 204) 7. EIA Scoping Opinion for a mixed-use development at Highsted Park Land to the South and East of Sittingbourne [Application reference 21/500819/EIASCO] (Pages 205 - 236) 8. Thanet District Council Statement of Community Involvement Review 2021 (Pages 237 - 238) 9. New Routes to Good Growth Consultation (Pages 239 - 250) 10. NPPF Changes and National Design Code Government Consultation (Pages 251 - 256) G. OTHER ITEMS WHICH THE CHAIRMAN DECIDES ARE URGENT EXEMPT ITEMS (At the time of preparing the agenda there were no exempt items. During any such items which may arise the meeting is likely NOT to be open to the public) Benjamin Watts General Counsel 03000 416814 Tuesday, 8 June 2021 (Please note that the draft conditions and background documents referred to in the accompanying papers may be inspected by arrangement with the Departments responsible for preparing the report.) Agenda Item A5 PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES of a meeting of the Planning Applications Committee held on Tuesday, 9 March 2021. PRESENT: Mr R A Marsh (Chairman), Mr R A Pascoe (Vice-Chairman), Mrs R Binks, Mr A H T Bowles, Mr D L Brazier (Substitute for Mr M A C Balfour), Mr J Burden, Mr N J D Chard (Substitute) (Substitute for Mr A Booth), Mr I S Chittenden, Mr P C Cooper, Mr P M Harman, Mr H Rayner, Mr C Simkins and Mr J Wright ALSO PRESENT: Mr R J Thomas IN ATTENDANCE: Mrs S Thompson (Head of Planning Applications), Mr P Hopkins (Principal Planning Officer), Mrs H Edwards (Senior Planning Officer), Mr C Finch (Senior Projects Officer - CAIP East Kent), Mr B Watts (General Counsel) and Mr A Tait (Democratic Services Officer) UNRESTRICTED ITEMS 14. Application CA/19/00904 (KCC/CA/0091/2019) - Construction of part of a new road (A28 Link Road) including viaduct between A28 Sturry Road and A291 Sturry Hill and associated on-line improvements at A28 Sturry Link Road, Sturry; KCC Major Capital Programme Team (Item D1) (1) Mr R A Marsh, the Chairman informed the Committee that he had decided to vacate the chair for this item and to address the Committee as the Local Member. He would not participate in the Committee’s deliberations or vote on the application. He then invited the General Counsel to explain the rules in relation to pre-disposition, pre-determination and bias as this affected all Members of planning committees. (2) Mr R A Pascoe, Vice Chairman thereupon took the Chair for the remainder of the meeting. He formally moved the recommendations which were seconded by Mr J Burden. (3) The Head of Planning Applications referred to correspondence from Cllr Georgina Glover, the Local City Councillor which had previously been circulated to all Members of the Committee. (4) The Head of Planning Applications informed the Committee that as Canterbury City Council’s decision to grant permission to Applications CA/20/02826 and CA/18/00868 had now been taken following the conclusion of Section 106 agreements, her recommendations needed to be amended accordingly. (5) The Clerk to the Committee read representations from the following people and organisations to the Committee:- - Sturry Parish Council; - Peta Boucher from the Sturry and Broad Oak Action Group; Page 1 - Nick Blake from the Sturry and Broad Oak Action Group and CPRE; - Louise Harvey -Quirke, the Local City Councillor; and - Richard Shelton form KCC Highways on behalf of the applicants. (6) Mr R A Marsh and Mr R J Thomas addressed the Committee in their capacity as Local Members. (7) On being put to the vote, the recommendations of the Head of Planning Applications were lost by 6 votes to 5. (8) In accordance with Section 17.33 of the Constitution, the votes by individual Members of the Committee on the Head of Planning Applications were recorded as follows:- FOR: Mr J Burden, Mr N J D Chard, Mr R A Pascoe, Mr C Simkins, Mr J Wright (5) AGAINST: Mrs R Binks, Mr A H T Bowles, Mr D L Brazier, Mr P C Cooper, Mr P M Harman, Mr H Rayner (6). (9) Also in accordance with Section 17.33 of the Constitution, the reasons for the decision were given as follows: RESOLVED that permission be refused to the application for the following reasons:- (a) The development makes inadequate provision for public transport infrastructure, contrary to policies T1 and T3 of the Canterbury District Local Plan, 2017 (b) The development fails to demonstrate that the navigation of the Great Stour River will not be compromised by the construction of the viaduct, contrary to policy LB13 of the Canterbury District Local Plan, 2017 (c) The proposed alterations at the A291/A28 junction make inadequate provision for local traffic movements, contrary to policies T1 and SP3 of the Canterbury District Local Plan, 2017. In respect of the local finance consideration arising from s43 of the Localism Act 2011, the Committee RESOLVED that:- (d) In determining planning application CA/19/00904, the construction of part of the A28 Link Road between A28 Sturry Road and A291 Sturry Hill and associated online improvements, at Sturry, Canterbury, the Committee considered the financial consideration in the form of £5.9m from the South East Local Economic Partnership Local Growth Fund, along with the development plan and other material planning considerations. These were set out in detail in the officer report and specifically referred to the obligation to consider local finance considerations in paragraphs 25, 179 and 200 of the report. The Committee in resolving to refuse planning permission considered that the grounds of refusal outweighed the local finance consideration in this instance. Page 2 Page 3 This page is intentionally left blank KENT COUNTY COUNCIL PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES of a meeting of the Planning Applications Committee held Online on Wednesday, 17 March 2021.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Message from Your County Councillor - September 2018
    A Message from your County Councillor - September 2018 As ever, Local Government’s quietest month August was followed by the busiest September. Thank goodness for two full days at the Hop Festival joined this year, for the first time, by my eldest grandson on day one. Local meetings and issues have dominated this month. These have included further meetings with residents together with Kent Highways to discuss flooding in Lynsted, Doddington and Bapchild. Some works have already been undertaken, a lot more are in the pipeline if you will excuse the pun. I have continued to visit Parish Councils to discuss the update to Swale’s Corporate Plan. This month we have debated with Parish Councillors and residents at Ospringe, Rodmersham, Hartlip, Dunkirk and Minster on Sheppey. In addition to these I have made my regular visits to Tunstall, Eastling, Sheldwich, Badlesmere and Leaveland, Selling and Stalisfield Parish Councils. I also tried to get to Bapchild Parish Council after the meeting at Minster on the Isle of Sheppey only to find they had finished! I did though arrive in time for a “catch up” with both the Chairman and the Clerk in the Village Hall car park. Also, in a localist vein I attended a meeting of the President and Vice- Presidents of the Kent Association of Local Councils and later in the month a Saturday morning Executive Meeting of the same body. There has also been a Swale Joint Transport Board and a Swale Rural Policing meeting with Swale Police and the National Farmers Union to Chair. I have had two trips to London in September, one for the National Executive Board of District Councils and one for the Executive of South East England Councils.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Hasted the History and Topographical Survey of the County
    Edward Hasted The history and topographical survey of the county of Kent, second edition, volume 6 Canterbury 1798 <i> THE HISTORY AND TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY OF THE COUNTY OF KENT. CONTAINING THE ANTIENT AND PRESENT STATE OF IT, CIVIL AND ECCLESIASTICAL; COLLECTED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS, AND OTHER AUTHORITIES: ILLUSTRATED WITH MAPS, VIEWS, ANTIQUITIES, &c. THE SECOND EDITION, IMPROVED, CORRECTED, AND CONTINUED TO THE PRESENT TIME. By EDWARD HASTED, Esq. F. R. S. and S. A. LATE OF CANTERBURY. Ex his omnibus, longe sunt humanissimi qui Cantium incolunt. Fortes creantur fortibus et bonis, Nec imbellem feroces progenerant. VOLUME VI. CANTERBURY PRINTED BY W. BRISTOW, ON THE PARADE. M.DCC.XCVIII. <ii> <blank> <iii> TO THOMAS ASTLE, ESQ. F. R. S. AND F. S. A. ONE OF THE TRUSTEES OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM, KEEPER OF THE RECORDS IN THE TOWER, &c. &c. SIR, THOUGH it is certainly a presumption in me to offer this Volume to your notice, yet the many years I have been in the habit of friendship with you, as= sures me, that you will receive it, not for the worth of it, but as a mark of my grateful respect and esteem, and the more so I hope, as to you I am indebted for my first rudiments of antiquarian learning. You, Sir, first taught me those rudiments, and to your kind auspices since, I owe all I have attained to in them; for your eminence in the republic of letters, so long iv established by your justly esteemed and learned pub= lications, is such, as few have equalled, and none have surpassed; your distinguished knowledge in the va= rious records of the History of this County, as well as of the diplomatique papers of the State, has justly entitled you, through his Majesty’s judicious choice, in preference to all others, to preside over the reposi= tories, where those archives are kept, which during the time you have been entrusted with them, you have filled to the universal benefit and satisfaction of every one.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Desk Based Assessment
    Trust for Thanet Archaeology Land at School Lane Bapchild Sittingbourne Kent NGR TQ 92910 62610 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment E. J. Boast and G. A. Moody March 2015 Issue 1 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Methodology 1.3 Scope of the Report 1.4 Structure of the Report 2 Planning Context 2.1 Background 2.2 National Planning Policy Relating to Heritage 2.3 Local Planning Framework 2.4 Statutory Legislation 3 Designated Heritage Assets in the Study Area 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Scheduled Ancient Monuments 3.3 Listed Buildings 3.4 Summary 4 Historical Resources 4.1 Historical Background of the Study Area and Wider region 5 Archaeological Resources and Potential 5.1 Geology and Topography 5.2 Non Designated Heritage Assets 5.3 Non Designated Heritage Assets within the Study Area 5.4 Non Designated Heritage Assets within the Site 5.5 General Summary of the Archaeology in its Landscape Context 6 Land Development 6.1 Cartographic Evidence for the Development of the Site 6.2 Cartographic Summary 7. The Site Inspection 7.1 The Site Inspection 7.2 The Site Inspection Summary 8 Impact Assessment 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Definitions of Level of Impact 8.3 Impacts Defined by the Study 8.4 Potential Impact of the Development of the Site 8.5 Potential Effects of Construction on the Archaeological Resource 9 Summary and Discussion 10 Acknowledgements 11 Sources consulted Appendices 1 Listed Building Descriptions 2 Gazetteer of non Designated Heritage Assets 3 The Proposed Development layout. Figures 1. Site location map showing boundary of site and Study Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Dave Brown by Dave Brown, 12-May-10 01:22 AM GMT
    Dave Brown by dave brown, 12-May-10 01:22 AM GMT Saturday 8th May 2010. One look out of the window told me today was not the day for butterflies or dragonflies. A phone call from a friend then had us heading to my favourite place. Good old Dungeness. Scenery not the best in the world but the wildlife exceeedingly good. Thirty minutes later we were watching a Whiskered Tern hawking insects over the New Diggings, showing from the road to Lydd. Also present were a few hundred Swifts, Swallows, House and Sand Martins, together with a few Common Terns. A quick chat with Dave Walker (very friendly Observatory Warden) and his equally friendly assistant confirmed that the recent weather there meant little or no Butterfly or moth activity. With the rain falling harder it was time to leave Dunge and head inland. The Iberian Chifchaf at Waderslade had already been present over a week so it was time to catch up with it. On arrival at the small wood of Chesnut Avenue the bird showed and sang within a few minutes of our arrival. This is still a scarce bird in Britain so where was the crowd. In 30 minutes the maximum crowd was five, and that included 3 from our family. It sang for long periods of time and only once did it mutter the usual Chifchaf call, otherwise it was Iberian Chifchaf all the way. It also look slighlty diferent in structure and colour. To my eyes the upper parts were greener, the legs were a brown colour and the tail appeared longer.
    [Show full text]
  • Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
    Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Sittingbourne Station (June 2019) I Onward Travel Information Buses and Taxis Local Area Map
    Sittingbourne Station (June 2019) i Onward Travel Information Buses and Taxis Local area map Rail replacement buses depart from the bus stops next to the station forecourt. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2018 & also map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, CC BY-SA Main destinations by bus (Data correct at June 2019) DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP Sittingbourne (Sterling 3X, 333 3 8+, 326, 327 1 9 1 Bapchild Key Street Road) 8+, 345# 1 334 3 Snipeshill (Canterbury 3X, 333 3 334 F Lower Halstow 327 1 Road - for Sittingbourne 8+, 345#, Bobbing Community College) 1 326, 327 1 Lower Rainham 327 1 349 Stockbury 334 3 Borden 8+, 345# 1 Lynsted 345# 1 8+, 345# 1 Bredgar 343+, 345# 1 Maidstone [ 334 3 Swanstree Estate 333 3 Bysing Wood 3X 3 The Meads 334 F 1 8+, 9, 326, 10 minutes walk from this 8+, 345# Teynham ^ 327, 345#, 1 station via High Street 3X, 333 3 Chalkwell 347 Memorial Hospital and Bell Road (see Local Tunstall Village 9, 343+ 1 334 3 area map) 9, 343+ 1 Upchurch 327 1 Danaway (Oad Street) 334 3 8+, 9, 326, Milton Regis 1 Davington 3X 3 327, 347 Notes Detling 334 3 Minster (Isle of Sheppey) 334 F Doddington 345# 1 Murston 349 1 Bus routes 333 and 334 run daily services. Bus routes 3X, 9, 326, 327, 347 and 349 run Mondays to Saturdays Eden Village 9 1 Newington ^ 326, 327 1 services, only. No Sunday services.
    [Show full text]
  • 13202 the LONDON GAZETTE, IST DECEMBER 1967 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACTS Messrs
    13202 THE LONDON GAZETTE, IST DECEMBER 1967 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACTS Messrs. E. C. Gransden & Co., Oak Lane, Upchurch. YEOVIL BOROUGH COUNCIL Any person desiring to question the validity of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT, 1933—SECTION 25 definitive map and statement on the ground that the map is not within the powers of the Act or on the The Borough of Yeovil (Wards) Order, 1967 ground that any requirement of the Act or any Notice is hereby given that Her Majesty The regulation made thereunder has not been complied Queen in Council on the 13th November 1967, with in relation to the preparation of the map or made the above Order approving a scheme for the of the draft and provisional maps on which it was division of the Borough into six wards and for the based, may within six weeks from the date of this allocation of the existing Councillors of the Borough notice make an application to the High Court in to represent these Wards with effect from the said accordance with the provisions of Part III of the 13th November 1967. First Schedule to the Act. A copy of the Order is open for inspection during Dated 30th November 1967. normal office hours at the Town Clerk's Department, Municipal Offices, King George Street, Yeovil. G. T. Heckels, Clerk of the County Council. Dated 29th November 1967. County Hall, Maidstone. T. S. Jewels, Town Clerk. Municipal Offices, (336) Yeovil. (308) NATIONAL COAL BOARD COAL ACT, 1938 AND COAL INDUSTRY NATIONAL PARKS AND NATIONALISATION ACT, 1946 ACCESS TO THE Notice is hereby given that pursuant to paragraph 6(2) of the
    [Show full text]
  • Jesty, and to Alter the Tolls and Charges Thereby Authorized To
    4026 and tenth years of the reign of Her present Ma- Town, in Sheerness, at a place called Banks Town, in jesty, and to alter the tolls and charges thereby the parish of Minster in Sheppey, in the Isle of Shep- authorized to be taken: And also to amend and pey, in the county of Kent, at a messuage now or lately enlarge some of the powers and provisions of the occupied by John Eaton, which said branch railway several Acts relating to the Thames and Medway will pass from, in, through, or info the several parishes, Canal and the Gravesend and Rochester Railway townships, and extra-parochial or other places next and Canal, passed respectively in the thirty-ninth hereinafter mentioned, or some of them, that is to and fortieth, and forty-fourth, fiftieth, and fifty- say, Halstow the Lower, Upchurch, Iwade, East- eighth years of the reign of King George the Third, church, Minster in Sheppey, Queenborough, the and the fifth year of the reign of King George borough of Quinborowe, Miletown, Bluetown, the Fourth, and the eighth and ninth, and ninth Banks Town and Sheerness, in the said county of and tenth years of the reign of Her present Kent. Majesty. Also another branch railway or railways com- And it is further proposed by such intended Act mencing from and out of the said intended main to authorise the construction and maintenance, by line in the parish of Preston next Faversham, in the South-Eastern Railway Company, of the rail- the county of Kent, at or near a footpath leading way, branch railways, and diverging line, hereinafter from Macknade
    [Show full text]
  • Lynsted Singles.Qxd
    L ynsted Published September 2002 Parish Design Statement Incorporating Design Guidelines as Supplementary Planning Guidance for Lynsted & Kingsdown. Adopted by Swale Borough Council 30th April 2002. During the last 18 months our group of volunteers has learnt a great deal about what we value in our surroundings. These are often features of the landscape and buildings that we take for granted but which give the parish of Lynsted and Kingsdown its unique character. We have taken great care to lis- ten to as many people as possible and to bring these views into the Statement. I would like to thank everyone who spoke to us, wrote to us, completed questionnaires and attended our public events. I hope you enjoy looking through the document. The Design Statement is intended as guidance to residents and those parties involved in shaping our environment. It is through this document that we, as a community, are having an influence on our environment, identifying the characteristics that we believe are important and wish to preserve. Ours is a living community and, therefore, a changing community. We can face up to that change with the confidence that everything we value will be protected and enhanced. David Powell Co-ordinator The production of the Lynsted Parish Design Statement has been made possible by the following, to whom we extend our thanks: Members past and present of the Lynsted Parish Design Statement Group and the people of the Parish Barrett & Co Ltd Coolchain European Regional Development Fund David Ferrett Harrisons Kent Down AONB Kent Rural Community Council Lynsted Parish Council David Murphy Shell’s “Employment Action” Scheme Swale Borough Council David Vasan Contents Parish context 4 The character of the landscape and setting 5 Settlement pattern and character 10 Building and spaces 12 Highways and traffic 16 The Supplementary Planning Guidance: Lynsted and Kingsdown Design Guidelines Annexes 18 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Decision Notices Issued by the Head of Development Services
    SCHEDULE OF DECISION NOTICES ISSUED BY THE HEAD OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NOVEMBER 2005 Application Applicant Proposed Development Planning Decision Decision Date SW/05/1167 Mr & Mrs D Taylor Proposed two storey side extension – 1 APPROVED with 01.11.05 conditions (C21414) Canberra Gardens, Sittingbourne SW/05/1055 South East Holiday Parks Variation of condition (i) of planning REFUSED 01.11.05 (C4248) Limited permission NK/8/50/81 to allow occupancy of site from 1st March to 1st January – Elmhurst Caravan Park, Second Avenue, Eastchurch, Sheerness SW/05/0593 Mr A Hanmer Retrospective application for change of use APPROVED with 01.11.05 (C21308) of garage to storage and games room – 34 conditions Rettendon Drive, Milton, Sittingbourne SW/05/1138 Mr & Mrs Logan Single storey rear extension – 25 Coleman APPROVED 01.11.05 (C21565) Drive, Kemsley SW/05/1172 Mr Roy Reid Retrospective application for the erection of REFUSED 01.11.05 (C18240) a raised decked area to the rear and side of the property including access to the rear side and doors – 40 Cliff Gardens, Minster, Sheerness SW/05/1179 Mr Mark Hutchins Demolish existing chalet rebuild in brick – APPROVED with 01.11.05 (C1057) 122 Park Avenue Holiday Village, Leysdown conditions SW/05/1151 Mr E Reynolds Erection of white pvcu conservatory to rear – APPROVED with 01.11.05 (C21071) 17 Dane Close, Hartlip conditions - 1 - Application Applicant Proposed Development Planning Decision Decision Date TC/05/0072 Mr R O Linforth Removal of two conifers – Chestnut House, APPROVED 01.11.05 89 The Street,
    [Show full text]
  • Memorials Located Within the Borough of Swale, Kent
    Memorials located within the Borough of Swale, Kent. This list of memorials has been compiled by Pat Robinson, Theresa Emmett and Janet Halligan researchers from the Historical Research Group of Sittingbourne (HRGS) from the research completed by various researchers from within HRGS and other groups, and is still on going. If you are aware of a memorial (new or no longer around) which should be included, please contact us at: [email protected] or find our website at www.hrgs.co.uk Last reviewed: 30/05/2017 Swale Memorials Location Description Picture Bapchild – WW1 Memorial inside church St Laurence Church Bapchild – WW2 Memorial inside church St Laurence Church Bobbing – WW1 Memorial inside church St Bartholomew’s Church Bobbing – Maynard Mansfield Knight St Bartholomew’s Church Lieutenant Mesopotamia 28/1/1919 Bobbing – Douglas Harcourt Stevens St Bartholomew’s Church 2nd Lieutenant The Buffs KIA France aged 18 6/8/1918 Bobbing – Christopher Maylum Elgar St Bartholomew’s Church Pilot Officer RAF 15/8/1941 Charles Robinson Elgar Squadron Leader RAF 22/5/1943 2 Swale Memorials Location Description Picture Borden – WW1 and WW2 memorial St Peter and St Paul’s Churchyard Borden – Henry Wise St Peter and St Paul’s Church Lieutenant Royal Navy inside Died of fever in West Indies Aged 23 21/7/1914 Boughton under Blean – Memorial cross for WW1 and St Barnabas Parish Centre WW2 The Street Names of men on plaques on wall behind it Boughton under Blean – Memorial Cross on grave of St Peter and St Paul German airman Anton Shon South Street Bredgar
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Statement Marden Neighbourhood Plan April 2019
    Page | 1 Consultation Statement Marden Neighbourhood Plan April 2019 Marden Neighbourhood Plan Basic Consultation Statement April 2019 Regulation 16 Page | 2 WHAT IS A CONSULTATION STATEMENT? The purposes of this consultation statement is to set out how the Marden Neighbourhood Plan (MNP) has fully engaged with the local residential and business community, nearby parishes, service providers, decision makers and other stakeholders. This statement is prepared in accordance with the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012. Section 15 (2) states In this regulation ‘consultation statement’ means a document which – (a) contains details of the persons and bodies who were consulted about the proposed neighbourhood plan; (b) explains how they were consulted; (c) summarises the main issues and concerns raised by the persons consulted; and (d) describes how these issues and concerns have been considered and, where relevant, addressed in the proposed neighbourhood development plan. Marden Neighbourhood Plan Basic Consultation Statement April 2019 Regulation 16 Page | 3 THE ETHOS OF THE MARDEN NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Marden Parish Council has always taken a proactive approach to understanding that change is inevitable and not always such a bad thing. The Parish Council was represented in the production of the Marden Design Statement in 2001 and the Marden Community Plan in 2007. The Parish Council has been eager to support any community-led document which would represent the views of the village and be a useful tool to influence development within the Parish. The intention has always been to update the work of the previous documents and it was originally envisaged that this would take the form of a Parish Plan.
    [Show full text]