Posted 10/15
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FINAL REPORT Hydroecology of Intermittent and Ephemeral Streams: Will Landscape Connectivity Sustain Aquatic Organisms in a Changing Climate? SERDP Project RC-1724 JULY 2015 Julian Olden University of Washington David Lytle Oregon State University Distribution Statement A This report was prepared under contract to the Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP). The publication of this report does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official policy or position of the Department of Defense. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Department of Defense. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON ABSTRACT OF a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE PAGES 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18 Table of Contents Abstract............................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... vii List of Figures .................................................................................................................... viii List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................. x Keywords ............................................................................................................................. x Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... x Plate ................................................................................................................................... xi Objective ............................................................................................................................xii 1. Hydrological connectivity and continuity of Fort Huachuca ............................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Methods ...................................................................................................................................2 1.2.1 Study area ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Approach ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2.3 Hydrological connectivity and connectivity .............................................................................. 13 1.3. Results and Discussion .......................................................................................................... 15 1.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 20 1.5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 20 2. Hydrology shapes taxonomic and functional structure of desert stream invertebrate communities ....................................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 21 2.2 Methods ................................................................................................................................. 23 2.2.1 Study area and invertebrate collection ....................................................................................... 23 2.2.2 Hydrology and environmental variables .................................................................................... 24 2.2.3 Functional trait data ................................................................................................................... 27 2.2.4 Statistical analyses ..................................................................................................................... 27 2.3. Results .................................................................................................................................. 31 2.3.1 Invertebrate assemblage structure and diversity across sampling sites ...................................... 31 2.3.2 Stream flow permanence as a driver of invertebrate diversity ................................................... 31 2.3.3 Relative roles of habitat, hydrology, and season in shaping invertebrate communities ............ 35 2.4 Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 35 2.5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 39 2.6 Appendix A ........................................................................................................................... 40 2.7 Appendix B ............................................................................................................................ 53 2.8 Appendix C ........................................................................................................................... 54 i 2.9 Appendix D ........................................................................................................................... 57 2.10 Appendix E .......................................................................................................................... 58 2.11 Appendix F .......................................................................................................................... 59 3. Dispersal strength determines meta-communities in a dendritic riverine network ........ 60 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 60 3.2 Materials and Methods .......................................................................................................... 63 3.2.1 Study site and field sampling ..................................................................................................... 63 3.2.2 Distance measures ...................................................................................................................... 65 3.2.3 Statistical analyses ..................................................................................................................... 69 3.3 Results ................................................................................................................................... 70 3.4 Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 77 3.4.1 Niche filtering due to among-habitat differences ....................................................................... 77 3.4.2 Dispersal ability ......................................................................................................................... 78 3.4.3 Distance among sites .................................................................................................................. 79 3.5 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 79 3.6 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 81 3.7 Appendix A ........................................................................................................................