DOCSLIB.ORG

2.0 Alternatives Considered

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2.0 Alternatives Considered South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension 2.0 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED This chapter describes the alternatives considered during the South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension Alternatives Analysis (AA) and the alternative considered in this Environmental Assessment (EA) process. Seven light rail transit (LRT) alternatives, a Bus/Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative and a No‐Build Alternative were evaluated during the AA phase. Two alternatives were considered during the EA phase, a No‐Build Alternative and an LRT Alternative, referred to here as the Build Alternative. The No‐Build Alternative includes transportation and transit projects that have a reasonable expectation of funding and/or are programmed for implementation. This alternative is used as a basis for comparison against the potential environmental impacts that would be associated with the proposed Build Alternative. The proposed action is a 2.6‐mile light rail transit project between Ledbetter Station and the University of North Texas Dallas campus derived from the AA process. 2.1 Alternatives Analysis The study area considered in the AA phase encompasses the area bound by Interstate Highway (IH) 20 and Ledbetter Drive (Loop 12), stretching from one‐half mile west of University Hills Boulevard to one‐half mile east of Lancaster Road [State Highway (SH) 342], accounting for approximately four square miles. The AA study area is wholly within Dallas County. Ledbetter Station, the Blue Line’s current southern terminus, is within the study area. Figure 2‐1 presents the regional location of the AA‐level study area. 2.1.1 Screening and Selection Process The screening and selection process followed during the AA phase consisted of two distinct phases: Conceptual and Detailed Evaluation. The Conceptual phase considered three LRT alternatives, two of which had vertical profile options. The three most promising LRT alternatives were carried into the Detailed Evaluation phase for comparison against a no‐build alternative and a bus/TSM alternative. The public input process conducted during the Detailed Evaluation phase produced two more LRT alternatives to consider. 2.1.2 Alternatives Considered for Conceptual Evaluation The Conceptual Evaluation process was designed to consider a range of light rail options available in the study area to serve existing and projected transportation needs and then narrow the number of LRT alternatives considered in the Detailed Evaluation phase. The LRT alternatives considered are shown in Figure 2‐2 and included the previously approved alignment (Alignment 3), which followed the west side of the open space in the study area; an alignment at the eastern side of the open space in the study area (Alignment 1); and one between the other two alignments (Alignment 2). The rolling terrain provided the opportunity to consider alternate vertical options for two of the alignments. For Alignment 1, one alternative (Alignment 1A) proposed traveling at‐grade before and after Camp Wisdom Station, which was located in a retained cut, while the other alternative (Alignment 1B) traveled on aerial structure and the station was at grade. Draft Local Environmental Assessment 2‐1 South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension Figure 2‐1 South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension Alternatives Analysis Study Area Source: CMEC, 2012 2‐2 Draft Local Environmental Assessment South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension Figure 2‐2 South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension Alignment Alternatives for Conceptual Evaluation Source: South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension Alternatives Analysis: LPA Report ‐ GPC, 2012 Draft Local Environmental Assessment 2‐3 South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension For Alignment 2, one alternative (Alignment 2A) proposed an at‐grade Camp Wisdom Station located just north of the City of Dallas police substation. In the other alternative (Alignment 2B), the proposed station location was on aerial structure straddling Camp Wisdom Road. As a result of the varying horizontal and vertical alignments, a total of five LRT alternatives were evaluated. The full evaluation of conceptual alternatives is documented in the South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension Alternatives Analysis: Conceptual Definition and Evaluation of Alternatives Report (General Planning Consultant, 2011). Criteria to evaluate alternatives reflected the alternative’s ability to: Enhance mobility Promote sustainability Strive for consensus Be fiscally responsible Consider appropriate technologies Minimize community and environmental impacts Based on the evaluation results, the range of LRT alternatives was narrowed from five to three (1B, 2A, and 3). The key alignment priorities revealed during the public input process conducted in conjunction with the conceptual evaluation were to: Maximize the distance of the alignment from the Villages of Runyon Springs and Singing Hills neighborhoods Encourage economic development in the open areas through which the alignment passes Minimize noise impacts to the Villages of Runyon Springs and Singing Hills neighborhoods 2.1.3 Alternatives Considered for Detailed Evaluation The Detailed Evaluation phase considered the three LRT alternatives carried forward from the Conceptual Evaluation phase as well as the No‐Build and Bus/TSM Alternatives which were included for comparison purposes. The Detailed Evaluation/Locally Preferred Alternative Report (General Planning Consultant, March 2012) documents the evaluation process and its outcome. The No‐Build Alternative assumes no new bus routes but does include service improvements to meet the needs of expected growth in the area. It includes all projects contained in the DART financial plan. The Bus/TSM Alternative consists of Bus Rapid Transit service along a line approximating the light rail alignments considered. This alternative is made up of priority bus service down Lancaster Road and then a dedicated roadway from Camp Wisdom Road along the southern boundary of UNT Dallas. Light Rail Transit Alternatives Considered The three horizontal alignments were carried forth from the conceptual level analysis for detailed evaluation. The LRT alternatives considered in the Detailed Evaluation phase were: 2‐4 Draft Local Environmental Assessment South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension 1B – This alignment is closest to Lancaster Road and includes an at‐grade Camp Wisdom Station location near Lancaster Road. 2A – This alignment goes to the west of the large hill known as Adam’s Ridge then turns east to run parallel to Patrol Way and includes an at‐grade Camp Wisdom Station location just north of the Police Substation. 3 – This alignment goes to the west of Adam’s Ridge and the Police Substation and includes an at‐grade Camp Wisdom Station location northwest of the Police Substation. All alternatives are greenfield options and follow the same alignment along the UNT Dallas boundary. 2.1.4 Rationale for Choosing the Locally Preferred Alternative The rationale for the selection of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) was based on a detailed and comprehensive evaluation and extensive public and agency involvement. The public and agency input process for this project is documented in the South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension Alternatives Analysis: Public Involvement Plan (General Planning Consultant, 2011). Interest in the project and its potential to spur economic development in a historically under‐ developed area led to broad community engagement and input. Two meetings were held specifically to discuss the LRT alignment and economic development potential. The first of these meetings was attended primarily by local developers, City of Dallas staff, and DART staff. The outcome of this meeting was an alternative combining elements of two of the LRT alternatives (culminating in Alternative 2C). This alternative directly addressed the concerns of the owner of the large parcel in the northern portion of the study area as well as optimized the size and location of remaining parcels to support economic development. The second meeting was a workshop with members of all working groups invited to attend. Two alignments were the main topic of discussion at this workshop: Alternative 2C, and a second alignment suggested by the Community Work Group to share a boundary line with the Lancaster Road right‐of‐way. This second alignment was called Alternative 1C. Details of this workshop are presented in Design Charrette for the South Oak Cliff (SOC‐3) Blue Line Extensions Alternatives Analysis (ZGF, November 14, 2011). Based on the results of the detailed evaluation and these two workshops, light rail was chosen as the mode to serve this corridor and Alternative 2C was chosen as the LPA, documented in Detailed Evaluation/Locally Preferred Alternative Report (General Planning Consultant, March 2012). Light rail transit was chosen as the preferred mode for this corridor since it provides the most benefits to transit users in terms of travel convenience and it offers the greatest economic development potential, while remaining compliant with local planning efforts laid out for South Dallas. LRT is also distinguished by better integration with existing transit infrastructure and maintenance facilities. Of the various LRT alternatives considered, the LPA offered lower noise impact, the most economic development potential, and the highest public and stakeholder acceptance based on the results of public involvement and the alternatives analysis phase. The LPA connects Ledbetter
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transportation
    4 | TRANSPORTATION Transportation Policies POLICY 1: Provide a full range of mobility choices. A. Anticipate and benefit from potential commuter rail. B. Plan development that is ‘transit-ready’ around Lancaster’s desired stations. C. Minimize impacts of potential high-speed rail. POLICY 2: Take advantage of Lancaster’s location within regional mobility systems (highways, public transportation, freight, air, etc). POLICY 3: Use Transportation improvements to strengthen key destinations within Lancaster. Introduction The purpose of a city’s transportation system is to provide the safe and efficient movement of people and goods within a comprehensive network of streets that complement the surrounding land uses. In addition to handling current and future congestion, a city’s transportation systems should be both livable and equitable. Creating a livable transportation environment means providing a system that serves people instead of just vehicles. Creating an equitable transportation system refers to ensuring that our transportation decision benefit people at all socio-economic levels. To ensure that Lancaster’s transportation system meets these livability and equitable ideals as the system is expanded, a number of challenges must be addressed. The City will continue to attract residents and businesses and the cities in the surrounding area will continue to grow, which will increase the volume of traffic that regularly travels to and through Lancaster. All of these challenges point to the need for a system that is less focused on the automobile and more attuned to developing and promoting alternative modes of transportation as viable options for mobility. The Preferred Future Land Use Scenario and the growth it is expected to create establish the foundation for the Transportation Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of DART in Southern Dallas
    Creating Transit Options for the Region Gary Thomas President/Executive Director October 27, 2016 Multimodal DART System • 120+ bus routes • 93 miles light rail • 35 miles commuter rail • Paratransit and vanpool • 107 million passenger trips annually 3 Current and Future Rail Services 4 Dallas Streetcar • Partnership between the city of Dallas and DART • 2.3-mile route • 6 Streetcar stops • Union Station to Bishop Arts District o Phase 1 opened April 2015 o Phase 2 opened August 2016 • Planned extensions include connection to the M-Line Trolley system 5 Blue Line Extension UNT Dallas Station • Opened October 2016 photo o 3-mile extension o Ends at the University of North Texas at Dallas • Added two new stations o UNT Dallas Station o Camp Wisdom Station • Renovated Ledbetter Station o Extended platforms o Improved lighting and Ledbetter Station visibility 6 Comprehensive Operations Analysis • Evaluate overall transit service efficiency and effectiveness o Route structure o Bus service type and size • Results in comprehensive review of all transit service as a system • Culminates in the 10-year bus service plan, which is foundation for 2040 Transit System Plan 7 Second Downtown Dallas Light Rail Alignment – “D2” • Easing train crowding downtown will add capacity and on-time performance • Much remains to be determined about the precise routing and other details 8 Cotton Belt 9 First Mile/Last Mile Partnerships • Adds convenience • Passengers can use DART in conjunction with these services • Apps are accessible through GoPass • Recent $1
    [Show full text]
  • 1.0 Purpose and Need
    South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED This chapter describes the need for transit improvements in southern Dallas and the purposes that the proposed Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) project is intended to serve. The chapter also reviews the planning context and history of local decision‐making regarding proposed improvements affecting the study area and presents the mobility, economic and community development, and environmental objectives to be addressed by the project. 1.1 Description of Proposed Action The proposed action, referred to here as the Build Alternative or South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension, is a 2.6‐mile light rail transit (LRT) extension of the DART Blue Line. The extension would consist of double‐tracked light rail, extending from the existing Ledbetter Station to the campus of the University of North Texas at Dallas (UNT Dallas), and include two new stations as shown in Figure 1‐1. The proposed project would provide high‐capacity, efficient, and reliable transit service for local area residents and to the developing UNT Dallas campus. The proposed project would respond to regional growth demands, enhance the sustainability and livability of the neighborhoods surrounding UNT Dallas, promote economic development, and support regional transit connectivity. The South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension to the UNT Dallas campus is the final planned line segment for the South Oak Cliff (SOC) Corridor. The existing Blue Line, which began operation to Illinois Station in 1996 as part of DART’s original starter system, consists of 28.8 miles and currently extends from Ledbetter Station in southern Dallas to downtown Rowlett.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinance No. an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No
    r ORDINANCE NO. 278 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 27432, PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 10, 2008, TO AMEND THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER SEVENTEEN, CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS (THE “TOD TIF DISTRICT”) TO REMOVE CERTAIN PROPERTIES FROM THE MOCKINGBIRD/LOVERS LANE SUB-DISTRICT, MOVE PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE EXISTING BOUNDARY IN THE 8TH AND CORINTH AREA FROM THE CEDARS WEST SUB-DISTRICT TO THE LANCASTER CORRIDOR SUB-DISTRICT, AND INCREASE THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA BY ADDING PROPERTY TO THE MOCKINGBIRD/LOVERS LANE, CEDARS WEST, AND LANCASTER CORRIDOR SUB-DISTRICTS, AND CREATING A NEW CEDAR CREST SUB-DISTRICT; ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ENACTING OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, on December 10, 2008, the City Council authorized the adoption of Ordinance No. 27432 which created Tax Increment Financing Reinvestment Zone Number Seventeen, (the “TOD TIE District”) in accordance with V.T.C.A. Tax Code, Chapter 311 (“Act”); and WHEREAS, the TOD TIF District was created to encourage transit-oriented development (TOD) around DART stations in the central portion of the City and help create a series of unique destinations, as well as foster the construction of structures or facilities that will be useful or beneficial to the development of transit stations along the DART light rail system in the central portion of the City; and WHEREAS, the TOD TIE District Board of Directors recommended a TIF District boundary amendment on January 20, 2010, consistent with the requirements and limitations of the Act; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2010, the City Council, per Resolution No.
    [Show full text]
  • BLUE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    BLUE light rail time schedule & line map Dart Light Rail - Blue Line View In Website Mode The BLUE light rail line (Dart Light Rail - Blue Line) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Northbound: 12:16 AM - 11:45 PM (2) Southbound: 12:04 AM - 11:39 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest BLUE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next BLUE light rail arriving. Direction: Northbound BLUE light rail Time Schedule 24 stops Northbound Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:16 AM - 11:45 PM Monday 12:16 AM - 1:10 AM UNT Dallas Station 1437 Wasco Ln, Dallas Tuesday Not Operational Camp Wisdom Station Wednesday 12:16 AM - 11:45 PM Ledbetter Station Thursday 12:16 AM - 11:45 PM Friday 12:16 AM - 11:45 PM Va Medical Center Station 4507 S Lancaster Ave, Dallas Saturday 12:16 AM - 11:45 PM Kiest Station 3231 South Lancaster Road, Dallas Illinois Tc/Station BLUE light rail Info Direction: Northbound Morrell Station Stops: 24 801 Woodbine Ave, Dallas Trip Duration: 70 min Line Summary: UNT Dallas Station, Camp Wisdom 8th & Corinth Station Station, Ledbetter Station, Va Medical Center 1803 E 8th St, Dallas Station, Kiest Station, Illinois Tc/Station, Morrell Station, 8th & Corinth Station, Santa Fe Junction, Santa Fe Junction Cedars Station, Convention Center Station, Ebj Union 1115 Parker St, Dallas Station, West End Station, Akard Station, St Paul Station, Pearl/Arts District Station, Cedars Station Cityplace/Uptown Station, Smu/Mockingbird 555 2nd Ave, Dallas Station, White Rock Station, Lake Highlands
    [Show full text]
  • Golink – Cypress Waters
    DARTzoom Draft New Network Detail of Changes March 9, 2021 This document describes the proposed new route network, including the old routes that they will replace and any changes to operating parameters such as frequency and hours of service. In order to keep the new routes distinct and easier to follow, we have used a new, temporary route numbering scheme for this proposal. DART is considering major changes to route numbers for this service change, and may adopt a different numbering scheme when the changes are finally implemented in January 2022. Table of Contents: Frequency Guide ______________________________________________________________________ 5 Existing & Draft Route Numbers Guide ____________________________________________________ 6 Details for Each Route in the Draft New Network __________________________________________ 17 Route 1 – Malcolm X – Maple _________________________________________________________________ 18 Route 3 – Cedar Springs _____________________________________________________________________ 20 Route 4 – Lemmon _________________________________________________________________________ 21 Route 5 – Haskell ___________________________________________________________________________ 18 Route 6 – Cole _____________________________________________________________________________ 19 Route 7 – Henderson ________________________________________________________________________ 20 Route 8 – Ross _____________________________________________________________________________ 21 Route 9 – Jefferson - Gaston __________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas Trail Plan
    Dallas Trail Network Plan City of Dallas Park and Recreation Department October 2008 Dallas Trail Network Plan City of Dallas Park and Recreation Table of Contents Summary 1 Trail Maps—Major Loop Trails Bachman Lake Park Trail 65 Active Trail Advocacy Groups and 6 Crawford Mem. Park Trail 66 Partners Inventory Fish Trap Lake Park Trail 67 Major Trails Map 7 Glendale Park Trail 68 Kiest Park Trail 69 Major Trails Inventory White Rock Lake Park Trail 70 Major Linear Trail Inventory 8 Trail Maps—Major Nature Trails Major Loop Trail Inventory 11 Major Nature Trail Inventory 12 Cedar Ridge Preserve Trails 72 Joppa Preserve Trails 73 Neighborhood Trails Map 13 L.B. Houston Park Trails 74 Neighborhood Trails Inventory 14 McCommas Bluff Trails 75 Texas Buckeye Trail 76 Trail Maps—Major Linear Trails Trinity Interpretive Center Trails 77 Bernal Trail 17 Valley View Park Trails 78 Cedar Crest Trail 18 Trail Photographic Documentation Appendix i Chalk Hill Trail 19 Coombs Creek Trail 20 Cottonbelt Trail 21 Cottonwood Trail 22 Dixon Branch Trail 24 Elm Fork Creek Trail 25 Elm Fork Trail 26 Five Mile Creek Trail 28 Great Trinity Forest Trail 30 Highland Hills Trail 31 Interurban Trail 32 John C. Phelps Trail 33 Katy Trail 34 Katy Spur Trail 37 Kiestwood Trail 38 Lake Highlands Trail 39 Matilda Trail 40 Northaven Trail 41 Prairie Creek Trail 43 Preston Ridge Trail 44 Runyon Creek Trail 45 Santa Fe Trail 46 Scyene Trail 48 Seagoville Trail 49 Southwest Dallas Trail 50 Timberglen Trail 51 Trinity Trail 52 Trinity Levee Trail 53 Trinity Strand Trail 56 Turtle Creek Trail 58 Union Pacific Trail 59 White Rock Creek Trail North 61 White Rock Creek Trail South 63 Dallas Trail Network Plan City of Dallas Park and Recreation 1 Introduction Methodology In 2002, the City of Dallas adopted the Park and During the Renaissance Plan process, planners Recreation Department’s Long Range utilized the broad Dallas County Trail Plan and Development Plan, A Renaissance Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster Dallas Desoto Duncanville Cockrell Hill
    451 LAKE LEWISVILLE 451 LEGACY DR PARKWOOD SH 121 TENNYSON 451 LEGACY DR PRESTON RD NORTH PLANO DART ON-CALL ZONE 829 SPRING CREEK PKWY 350 451 SPRING CREEK PKWY COLLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE JUPITER RD 350 347 PLANO RD PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL PLANO 350 PA R KER RD 451S 451 316 KER RD PARKER RD 451 AR PARKER ROAD STATION P 350, 410, 451 EAST PLANO PRESTON RD. DART ON-CALL, TI Shuttle COMMUNICATIONS 350 451 DART ON-CALL ZONE P 829 410 451 PARK BL CUSTER RD VD CREEK RD COIT INDEPENDENT 331 347 ALMA 410 ARBOR PARK BLVD CHEYENNE PARK BLVD TRINITY MEDICAL 316 760 570 CENTER 451 DOWNTOWN PLANO STATION 14TH HEBRON 570, 760, DART ON-CALL 347 PLANO 570 MEDICAL CENTER 15TH 15TH OHIO OF PLANO 350 SHILOH PARKWOOD 210 570 WEST PLANO TRANSIT CENTER PLANO PKWY 210 760 570 IN 316 210, 316, 350, 451, FM 544 TE RN 350 ATIONAL PKWY BAYLOR REGIONAL 350 COLLIN CREEK MALL 760 347 350 MEDICAL CENTER 316 K AVE SUMMIT 341 ROSEMEADE PKWY 210 451 841 RON PLANO PKWY HEB PLANO PKWY MA 350 PLE 316 316 N AVE LUNA S MARSH H SH 121 (Bypass) 316 ADE 410 841 ROUND GROVE E P 331 TIMBERGREEN HAVERWOOD URNPIK SH T BUSH TURNPIKE STATION 341 P U 316, 883, 841 FLEX 347 R B E E 883 US 75 RENNER RD FRANKFORD RD. S G ORD RD 184 I R FRANKF DE EO RENNER RD 824 841 PEAR RIDGE PEAR NT G 341 333 CAMPBELL 333 BRECKINRIDGE 841 SHILOH PATTON VAIL HILLCREST RD 883 RICHARDSON PLANO RD PRESTON RD DALLAS N.
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas Area Rapid Transit Impact Study: a Framework for Assessing Land Use and Development Impacts
    CENTER LIBRARY .., r DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT IMPACT STUDY: A FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS Patrick J. Coleman Mark A. Euritt C. Michael Walton Research Report SWUTC/92160024-1 Southwest Region University Transportation Center Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712 MAY 1993 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Accessibility plays a significant role in land development. Simply stated, any plot of land targeted for economic activity must be accessible both to developmental activity and to the potential markets that such activity seeks to attract. Historically, it was this principle of accessibility that determined in each U.S. city the particular center of commercial activity, later termed the central business district (CBD). Now, with urban development giving way to suburban development, cities are increasingly exploring ways in which accessibility-through public transportation-can be used to foster economic development in these suburban areas as well. And one of the ways in which cities chart the success (or failure) of transit investment is through the land use impact study. This report, then, investigates strategies for measuring land use impacts. Its particular focus is the city of Dallas, where a starter system in the $2.4 billion Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) project is currently under construction. The framework outlined in this document provides a strategy and a schedule for measuring changes in land use and development in the Dallas area. In weighing strategies for measuring land-use impacts, we reviewed seven existing transit impact studies, each selected on the basis of the quality of the impact study, system characteristics (type, size, and age), and the demographic characteristics of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Desoto Strategic Public Transportation Planning Study
    Prepared by City of DeSoto in association with: Strategic Public Transportation Nelson Nygaard Consulting Associates Urban Analytics Planning Study McDonald Transit Associates, Inc. December 2011 Strategic Public Transportation Planning Study City of DeSoto, Texas Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... ES-1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................ES-1 Existing Conditions of Transportation...............................................................................................ES-1 Needs Assessment...........................................................................................................................ES-2 Potential Services to Meet Community Needs .................................................................................ES-2 Recommended Phasing of Public Transportation Measures .............................................................ES-3 Case Studies of Service Concepts Implemented in the Area .............................................................ES-3 Financing .........................................................................................................................................ES-4 Chapter 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................... 1 Background ..........................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • System Map 551 829 HOPKINS R 500 DFW KIRBY 500 LEWISVILLE 987
    LAKE LEWISVILLE 346 348 EXCHANGE PKWY 348 LEGACY DR PARKWOOD SH 121 SHOPS AT 452 348 452 LEGACY 346346 LEGACY DR TENNYSON 347 P 183 451 208 NORTH PLANO NORTHWEST PLANO DART ON-CALL ZONE PARK AND RIDE 183, 208, 346, 347, PRESTON RD 348, 451, 452 SPRING CREEK PKWY 452 SPRING CREEK PKWY 829 LAKESIDE US-75 N. CENTRAL EXPWY. COLLIN COUNTY MARKET COMMUNITY 350 COLLEGE JUPITER RD 350 TEXAS HEALTH 451 PLANO RD PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL PLANO PARKER RD 452 R RD COMMUNICATIONS 347 PARKER RD PARKER ROAD STATION PARKE 350, 410, 452 183 PRESTON RD. DART ON-CALL, TI Shuttle, Texoma Express 410 CUSTER RD SHOPS AT RD COIT PARK BLVD INDEPENDENCE PARK BLVD CREEK WILLOWBEND 410 ALMA ARBOR 531 347 PARK BLVD PARK BLVD CHEYENNE 870 451 BAYLOR MEDICAL CTR. 18TH 870 AT CARROLLTON HEBRON PLANO DOWNTOWN PLANO STATION MEDICAL CENTER 870 FLEX 208 OF PLANO 15TH 15TH OHIO 14TH IN T PARKWOOD E 350 R 13TH 870 N A PLANO PKWY TI 210 COLLIN CREEK MALL ON JACK HATCHELL TRANSIT CENTER FM 544 AL P KWY 841 210, 350, 451, 452, 841 FLEX SH-121 347 210 BAYLOR REGIONAL 870 843 AVE K AVE 843 841 MEDICAL CTR. ROSEMEADE PKWY 534 841 PLANO PKWY PLANO PKWY HEBRON to Denton (operated by DCTA) 531 347 841 MARSH LUNA 350 841 410 WAL-MART 883 Fri/Sun 841 ROUND GROVE NPIKE NORTH STAR RD TIMBERGREEN H TUR NORTH CARROLLTON/FRANKFORD STATION P S BUSH TURNPIKE STATION 333 U 883 UTD Shuttle, 841-843 FLEX PEAR RIDGE PEAR B IH-35E STEMMONS FRWY.
    [Show full text]
  • DART Service Updates for Thursday, February 18, 2021
    Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) Extreme Winter Weather Service Update February 17, 2021 DART Service Updates for Thursday, February 18, 2021 Due to the extreme winter weather, snowfall and hazardous road conditions around North Texas, and for the safety of both our passengers and employees, DART remains in Operating Scenario 2 of their Severe Winter Weather Operating Plans. DART Light Rail Service DART rail service will remain suspended on Thursday, February 18. DART Bus Service DART buses will continue service on a Saturday schedule with limited additional service on local routes 63 and 362 from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. DART is also running an additional 14 shuttle bus routes. The Operating Scenario 2 shuttle bus routes are available on the DART website at https://www.dart.org/winterweather. The Dallas Streetcar will not operate at this time, but there will be a shuttle bus running to and from EBJ Union Station and the Bishop Arts District, making all stops. Trinity Railway Express (TRE) Service TRE will operate service on a Saturday schedule beginning on Thursday, February 18. There may be delays depending on weather conditions. Stay informed about any service changes by registering for TRE Alerts at www.trinityrailwayexpress.org. DART Paratransit Service DART Paratransit will operate limited service between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Thursday and Friday, February 18 and 19 for medical and dialysis trips only. Regular service will resume on Saturday, February 20. Customers may book trips beginning Thursday for Friday through Monday trips. Customers who need to book trips or check the status of their trip can contact reservations at (214) 515-7272 or through the web portal at www.dart.org/ridepara.
    [Show full text]