Behavior of Centrosomes During Fertilization and Cell Division In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Behavior of Centrosomes During Fertilization and Cell Division In Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 83, pp. 105-109, January 1986 Cell Biology Behavior of centrosomes during fertilization and cell division in mouse oocytes and in sea urchin eggs (mitosis/cytoskeleton/maternal Inheritance/microtubules) HEIDE SCHATTEN*, GERALD SCHATTEN*, DANIEL MAZIAt, RON BALCZON*t, AND CALVIN SIMERLY* *Department of Biological Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-3050; and tHopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950 Contributed by Daniel Mazia, September 5, 1985 ABSTRACT The forms and locations of centrosomes in antibodies to centrosomal material (5), the origins and be- mouse oocytes and in sea urchin eggs were followed through the havior of centrosomes during fertilization and division can whole course of fertilization and first cleavage by immu- now be explored. This investigation provides experimental nofluorescence microscopy. Centrosomes were identified with evidence supporting the hypothesis that centrosomes are an autoimmune antiserum to centrosomal material. Staining of indeed "flexible" (1). They reproduce during interphase and the same preparations with tubulin antibody and with the DNA aggregate and separate during mitosis. Sea urchins and dye Hoechst 33258 allowed the correlation of the forms of the probably most animals obey Boveri's rules and the centrosomes with the microtubule structures that they generate centrosomes are paternally inherited. Surprisingly, mouse and with the stages of meiosis, syngamy, and mitosis. The centrosomes are of maternal origin.- results with sea urchin eggs conform to Boveri's view on the paternal origin ofthe functional centrosomes. Centrosomes are MATERIALS AND METHODS seen in spermatozoa and enter the egg at fertilization. Initially, Mouse and sea urchin fertilization was as described (6). Sea the centrosomes are compact, but as the eggs enter the mitotic urchin eggs were extracted in a microtubule-stabilization cycle the forms of the centrosomes go through a cycle in which buffer (7), and mouse egg cytoskeletons were stabilized with they spread during interphase, apparently divide, and con- a similar mixture (4). The cells were affixed to polylysine- dense into two compact poles by metaphase. In anaphase, they coated coverslips (8). Sea urchin eggs were fixed in methanol spread to form flat poles. In telophase and during reconstitu- at - 10TC and mouse eggs were fixed in 10 mM ethylene glycol tion of the daughter nuclei, the centrosomal material is bis(succinimidyl)succinate (9). Autoimmune centrosomal an- dposed as hemispherical caps around the poleward surfaces tiserum 5051 was derived from a patient with scleroderma as of the nuclei. Mouse sperm lack centrosomal antigen. In the described (5). Centrosomes, microtubules, and DNA in the unfertilized mouse oocyte, the meiotic spindle poles are dis- same egg were detected by first labeling with centrosomal played as broad-beaded centrosomes. In addition, centrosomal antibodies followed with antitubulin (10) and then staining the material is detected in the cytoplasm as particles, about 16 in DNA with Hoechst dye 33258. Epifluorescence microscopy number, which are foci of small aster-like arrays of microtu- and photography were as described (6). bules. The length and number of astral microtubules correlate with the size of the centrosomal foci. After sperm incorpo- RESULTS ration, as the pronuclei develop and more cytoplasmic micro- The arrangements ofthe microtubules at the various stages of tubules assemble, a few ofthe foci associate with the peripheries fertilization and cell division conform well to the shapes of of the nuclei. The number of foci multiplies during the first cell the centrosomes in both sea urchins and mice. In sea urchins, cycle. At the end of interphase, all of the centrosomal foci have centrosomes are found at the base ofthe sperm head (Fig. LA) concentrated on the nuclear peripheries and the cytoplasmic but are not detected in the unfertilized egg. After sperm microtubules have disappeared. Atprophase, thecentrosomes are incorporation, they are introduced into the egg, appearing as seen as two irregular clusters, marking the poles which, at a spot (CENTR, Fig. 1B) from which the microtubules of the metaphase and anaphase, appear as rough bands with foci, and sperm aster extend (MTs, Fig. iB). During the pronuclear the spindle is typically barrel-shaped. At telophase, the migrations (Fig. 1C) and syngamy (Fig. ID), the centrosomes centrosomes are seen as arcs that lie on the nuclear peripheries into an arc over the and microtubules from after cleavage. The ordering of microtubules in all the stages spread pronuclei, reflects the shapes of the centrosomes. The findings on the sea these crescents form partial monasters. At the streak stage urchin confirm the classical theory of the paternal origin of (Fig. 1E), two discrete centrosomes are observed and two centrosomes and contrast with observations tracing the mitotic microtubule arrays extend from the nuclear surface. poles of the mouse egg to maternal centrosomal material. This During first division, the centrosomes are initially compact evidence strengthens the conclusion that mouse centrosomes but later flatten and enlarge. At prophase (Fig. 1F) and meta- derive from the oocyte. phase (Fig. 1G) the centrosomes are compact spheres from which the asters and spindle extend. During anaphase (Fig. 1H) Centrosomes, recently proposed by Mazia to be "flexible the centrosomes flatten and microtubules are lost at the astral bodies" (1), have been thought to be of paternal origin since centers. At telophase (Fig. 11) the centrosomes enlarge into the early studies of Boveri (ref. 2, reviewed in ref. 3). ellipses with regional concentrations of antigen. The micro- However, evidence that microtubules are organized by tubules continue to elongate at the astral peripheries and centers within the unfertilized egg during mouse fertilization disassemble at the aster centers. At cleavage the centrosomes (4) has raised the question whether mammalian centrosomes condense along the poleward faces ofthe karyomeres (Fig. LI) might be maternally inherited. With the recent discovery of and daughter nuclei (Fig. 1K), with microtubules correspond- ingly organized into partial monasters. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" *Present address: Department of Cell Biology, Baylor College of in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. Medicine, Houston, TX 77030. 105 106 Cell Biology: Schatten et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 (1986) El= -I FIG. 1. Centrosomes during sea urchin fertilization and division. Centrosomes are found at the base of sperm heads (arrows, A) but not in unfertilized eggs (not shown). After sperm incorporation (B), they appear as a spot (CENTR, left panel) on the male pronucleus (DNA, center panel) at the center of the microtubules comprising the sperm aster (MTs, right panel). Following the pronuclear migrations (C) and during pronuclear fusion (D), the centrosomes spread into crescents from which microtubules are organized. Two centrosomes are observed at the streak stage (E), when the bipolar microtubule array extends from the nucleus. At prophase (F) the centrosomes condense and are at the center of a pair of asters. At tnetaphase (G) they remain as compact spheres from which the astral and spindle microtubules emanate. They flatten at anaphase (H) while the microtubules at the astral peripheries elongate and those at the astral centers disassemble. During telophase (I) the centrosomes expand in the direction of the next mitotic plane and there is a corresponding loss of microtubules at the astral interiors. The centrosomes aggregate on the poleward surfaces of the decondensing karyomeres (J) and reconstituting nuclei (K) during cleavage. In G and H, eggs are triple-stained for centrosomes (CENTR), microtubules (MTs), and DNA. Others are double-stained for centrosomes and DNA, with an antitubulin image at the same stage. M, male pronucleus; F, female pronucleus. Arrows in C and D point to centrioles. (Bars = 10 ,um.) Centrosomes -are not detected in mouse sperm, and the organizing centers in mouse oocytes. Microtubules radiate unfertilized mouse oocyte displays an unusual pattern of from each focus (MTs, Fig. 2A). At sperm incorporation (Fig. centrosomal material, as predicted by earlier observation of 2 C and D) and the pronuclear movements (Fig. 2 E and F), the arrangements ofmicrotubules (4). Centrosomal antigen is asters extend from the centrosomal foci. Foci with asters detected at the meiotic spindle poles (ref. 5; Fig. 2 A and B) associate with the pronuclei (Fig. 2 C and E; Table 1). Later, and as 16 cytoplasmic concentrations (CENTR, Fig. 2A; numerous foci are found and the pronuclei are embedded Table 1). Maro et al. (29) also find non-spindle microtubule- within an array of microtubules (Fig. 2 F and G). All Cell Biology: Schatten et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 (1986) 107 Table 1. Centrosomal foci during the first cell cycle in mouse eggs Stage No. of foci (mean ± SEM, n = 95) Unfertilized oocyte 16.3 ± 5.6* Oocyte during sperm incorporation 15.5 ± 6.0 Oocyte during pronucleus 14.8 ± 3.1 formation (0.8 ± 0.5 with F pronucleus; 1.8 ± 0.8 with M pronucleus) Pronucleate eggs 16.5 ± 4.4 (2.2 ± 1.3 with F pronucleus; 4.0 ± 2.3 with M pronucleus) Eggs with adjacent 17.3 ± 8.7 but eccentric pronuclei (1.9 ± 1.5 with F pronucleus; 4.1 ± 2.8 with M pronucleus) Eggs with apposed centered 14.5 ± 1.7 pronuclei (1.3 ± 0.5 with F pronucleus; 3.8 ± 2.1 with M pronucleus) Pronucleate eggs 54.0 ± 16.1 at end of first interphase (11.6 ± 8.7 with F pronucleus; 14.4 ± 6.7 with M pronucleus) Prophase 38.8 ± 12.2 Metaphase 15.4 ± 4.1 Anaphase and telophase 15.6 ± 3.0 Cleavage 20.5 ± 3.3 The number of detectable aggregates of centrosomal antigen U increases during first interphase and then condenses during mitosis. F, female; M, male.
Recommended publications
  • Robert Patrick (Bob) Goldstein James L
    Robert Patrick (Bob) Goldstein James L. Peacock III Distinguished Professor Biology Department University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280 USA email bobg @ unc.edu, phone 919 843-8575 http://www.bio.unc.edu/faculty/goldstein/ PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1999-current Faculty, UNC Chapel Hill Biology Department and Member, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center EDUCATION PhD: University of Texas at Austin, 1992, Zoology BS: Union College, Schenectady, New York, 1988, Biology RESEARCH TRAINING 1996-1999 Miller Institute Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Laboratory of Dr. David Weisblat. 1992-1996 Postdoctoral Fellow, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, England. Laboratory of Dr. John White 1992-1993. Independent 1993-1996. 1988-1992 PhD student, University of Texas at Austin. Laboratory of Dr. Gary Freeman. AWARDS 2018 Chapman Family Teaching Award, UNC Chapel Hill 2016 James L. Peacock III Distinguished Professor 2008 Elected Life Member of Clare Hall, Cambridge University 2007 Guggenheim Fellow 2007 Visiting Fellow, Clare Hall, Cambridge University 2005 Phillip and Ruth Hettleman Prize for Artistic and Scholarly Achievement by Young Faculty at UNC Chapel Hill 2000-2004 Pew Scholar 2000-2002 March of Dimes Basil O'Connor Scholar 1996-1998 Miller Institute Research Fellow, University of California, Berkeley 1996 Medical Research Council Postdoctoral Fellow, Cambridge, England 1995 Development Traveling Fellow 1994-1996 Human Frontiers
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy in Biology and Medicine: Biological Individuality and Fetal Parthood, Part I
    Oslo, Norway July 7–12, 2019 ISHP SS B BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 2 Index 11 Keynote lectures 17 Diverse format sessions 47 Traditional sessions 367 Individual papers 637 Mixed media and poster presentations A Aaby, Bendik Hellem, 369 Barbosa, Thiago Pinto, 82 Abbott, Jessica, 298 Barker, Matthew, 149 Abir-Am, Pnina Geraldine, 370 Barragán, Carlos Andrés, 391 D’Abramo, Flavio, 371 Battran, Martin, 158 Abrams, Marshall, 372 Bausman, William, 129, 135 Acerbi, Alberto, 156 Baxter, Janella, 56, 57 Ackert, Lloyd, 185 Bayir, Saliha, 536 Agiriano, Arantza Etxeberria, 374 Beasley, Charles, 392 Ahn, Soohyun, 148 Bechtel, William, 259 El Aichouchi, Adil, 375 Bedau, Mark, 393 Airoldi, Giorgio, 376 Ben-Shachar, Erela Teharlev, 395 Allchin, Douglas, 377 Beneduce, Chiara, 396 Allen, Gar, 328 Berry, Dominic, 56, 58 Almeida, Maria Strecht, 377 Bertoldi, Nicola, 397 Amann, Bernd, 40 Betzler, Riana, 398 Andersen, Holly, 19, 20 Bich, Leonardo, 41 Anderson, Gemma, 28 LeBihan, Soazig, 358 Angleraux, Caroline, 378 Birch, Jonathan, 22 Ankeny, Rachel A., 225 Bix, Amy Sue, 399 Anker, Peder, 230 Blais, Cédric, 401 Ardura, Adrian Cerda, 380 Blancke, Stefaan, 609 Armstrong-Ingram, Tiernan, 381 Blell, Mwenza, 488 Arnet, Evan, 383 Blute, Marion, 59, 62 Artiga, Marc, 383 Bognon-Küss, Cécilia, 23 Atanasova, Nina, 20, 21 Bokulich, Alisa, 616 Au, Yin Chung, 384 Bollhagen, Andrew, 402 DesAutels, Lane, 386 Bondarenko, Olesya, 403 Aylward, Alex, 109 Bonilla, Jorge Armando Romo, 404 B Baccelliere, Gabriel Vallejos, 387 Bonnin, Thomas, 405 Baedke, Jan, 49, 50 Boon, Mieke, 235 Baetu,
    [Show full text]
  • Centrosome Detection in Sea Urchin Eggs with a Monoclonal
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 84, pp. 8488-8492, December 1987 Cell Biology Centrosome detection in sea urchin eggs with a monoclonal antibody against Drosophila intermediate filament proteins: Characterization of stages of the division cycle of centrosomes (cytoskeleton/fertilization/microtubules/mitosis) HEIDE SCHATTEN*, MARIKA WALTERt, DANIEL MAZIAt, HARALD BIESSMANNt, NEIDHARD PAWELETZ§, GE2RARD COFFE*, AND GERALD SCHATTEN* *Integrated Microscopy Resource for Biomedical Research, University of Wisconsin, 1117 West Johnson Street, Madison, WI 53706; tCenter for Developmental Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717; tHopkins Marine Station, Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950; and 1lnstitute for Cell and Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center, D-6900 Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany Contributed by Daniel Mazia, August 27, 1987 ABSTRACT A mouse monoclonal antibody generated Most all of the previous immunocytochemical work on against DrosophUa intermediate filament proteins (designated centrosomes has used an autoimmune serum from a patient Ah6/5/9 and referred to herein as Ah6) is found to cross-react suffering from CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, specifically with centrosomes in sea urchin eggs and with a esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly, telangiectasia) scle- 68-kDa antigen in eggs and isolated mitotic apparatus. When roderma (6-10). However, the inability to use this serum for preparations stained with Ah6 are counterstained with a immunoblotting precluded
    [Show full text]
  • Bioelectric Responses at Fertilization: Separation of the Events Associated
    Gamete Research 5:363-377 (1982) Bioelectric Responses at Fertilization: Separation of the Events Associated With Insemination From Those Due to the Cortical Reaction in Sea Urchin, Lytechinus variegatus Dieter Hulser and Gerald Schatten Department of Biological Science, The Florida State University, Tallahassee The bioelectric responses at fertilization of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus are a com- plex series of membrane potential and resistance changes that occur concomitant with ga- mete fusion, ionic fluxes, and the cortical granule discharge. This work attempts to separate the electrical effects of sperm-egg interactions from those of the cortical reactions. Two ap- proaches were taken to discern the electrical events associated with insemination, distinct from cortical granule discharge: 1) fertilization of eggs treated with 3% urethane, 10 mM procaine, or 10 mM nicotine, to prevent the cortical reaction and 2) refertilization of fertil- ized eggs (denuded with 1 mM aminotriazole containing 1 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor). Cortical granule discharge in the absence of sperm incorporation was investigated by artifi- cial activation with 5 pM A23187 or by fertilization in the presence of 10 pM cytochalasin D, which prevents incorporation. These results are consistent with a model in which the sperm-egg interaction triggers both a rapid (50-400 msec), but minor (= 10 mV), electrical transient that leads to an action potential and then both the Na+-dependent fast block to polyspermy and the late block re- sulting from the secretion of the cortical granules. Key words: fertilization, sea urchin, bioelectric response, secretion, motility INTRODUCTION At fertilization the sea urchin egg undergoes a complex series of electrical changes in membrane potential and resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Fraudulent Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in South Korea: Lessons Learned
    Accountability in Research, 13:101–109, 2006 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0898-9621 print DOI: 10.1080/08989620600634193 GACR0898-96211545-5815Accountability in Research:Research Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 01, February 2006: pp. 0–0 Commentary FRAUDULENT HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH IN SOUTH KOREA: LESSONS LEARNED Commentary:D. B. Resnik et Korean al. Stem Cell Fraud DAVID B. RESNIK , JD, PHD National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA ADIL E. SHAMOO, PHD Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA SHELDON KRIMSKY, PHD Department of Urban & Environmental Policy & Planning, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Now that most of the smoke has cleared from the South Korean human embryonic stem cell fraud, it is time to reflect on some lessons that one can learn from this scandal. First, a brief review of events will help to set the stage. In June 2005, Seoul University investigator Woo Suk Hwang and 24 co-authors published what appeared to be a ground- breaking paper in Science in which they claimed to have estab- lished eleven embryonic stem cell lines containing nuclear DNA from somatic cells of research subjects (Hwang et al., 2005). In March 2004, Hwang’s research team had published another apparently important paper in which they claimed to have estab- lished one cell line with the nuclear DNA from a research subject (Hwang et al 2004). If these two papers had been valid, they would have represented a significant step forward in human embryonic stem cell research, since they would have demon- strated the feasibility of a technique known as therapeutic Editor’s note: Although this piece is not related to the topic of this issue, we felt it was important to comment on the recent events in South Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for Improving Animal Models for Regenerative Medicine
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Cell Stem Cell Forum Strategies for Improving Animal Models for Regenerative Medicine Jose Cibelli,1 Marina E. Emborg,2 Darwin J. Prockop,3 Michael Roberts,4 Gerald Schatten,5 Mahendra Rao,6 John Harding,7 and Oleg Mirochnitchenko7,* 1Michigan State University, Cellular Reprogramming Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, B270 Anthony Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 2University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Medical Physics and Wisconsin National Primate Research Center, 1223 Capitol Court, Madison, WI 53715, USA 3Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine Institute for Regenerative Medicine at Scott and White, Department of Medicine, 5701 Airport Road, Module C, Temple, TX 76502, USA 4University of Missouri, 240b C.S. Bond Life Sciences Center, 1201 East Rollins Street, Columbia, MO 65211-7310, USA 5University of Pittsburgh, Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, S362 Biomedical Science Towers, 3500 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA 6Center for Regenerative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 50 South Drive, Suite 1140, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA 7Division of Comparative Medicine/ORIP/DPCPSI/OD, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 943/950, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2013.01.004 The field of regenerative medicine is moving toward translation to clinical practice. However, there are still knowledge gaps and safety concerns regarding stem cell-based therapies. Improving large animal models and methods for transplantation, engraftment, and imaging should help address these issues, facilitating eventual use of stem cells in the clinic.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Are We Ready for Genome Editing in Human Embryos for CLINICAL
    Are we ready for genome editing in human embryos FOR CLINICAL PURPOSES? Joyce C Harper and Gerald Schatten Joyce C Harper, Professor of Reproductive Science, Institute for Women’s Health, University College Londona Gerald Schatten, Professor of Ob-Gyn-Repro Sci, Cell Biology and Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicineb aInstitute for Women’s Health, University College London, 86-96 Chenies Mews, London, WC1E 6HX, UK, 0044 7880 795791, [email protected] (Corresponding author) b204 Craft Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412/641-2403 [phone] 412/641-6342 [fax] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Perhaps the two most significant pioneering biomedical discoveries with immediate clinical implications during the past forty years have been the advent of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and the genetics revolution. ART, including in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection and preimplantation genetic testing, has resulted in the birth of more than 8 million children, and the pioneer of IVF, Professor Bob Edwards, was awarded the 2010 Nobel Prize. The genetics revolution has resulted in our genomes being sequenced and many of the molecular mechanisms understood, and technologies for genomic editing have been developed. With the combination of nearly routine ART protocols for healthy conceptions together with almost error- free, inexpensive and simple methods for genetic modification, the question “Are we ready for genome editing in human embryos FOR CLINICAL PURPOSES?” was debated at the 5th Congress on Controversies in Preconception, Preimplantation and Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis, in collaboration with the Ovarian Club Meeting, in November 2018 in Paris. The co-authors each presented scientific, medical and bioethical backgrounds, and the debate was chaired by Professor Alan Handyside.
    [Show full text]
  • IVF) Versus Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Calvin R
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Fertilization and Cleavage Axes Difer In Primates Conceived By Conventional (IVF) Versus Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Calvin R. Simerly1, Diana Takahashi2, Ethan Jacoby3, Carlos Castro1, Carrie Hartnett1, Laura Hewitson4, Christopher Navara5 & Gerald Schatten 1* With nearly ten million babies conceived globally, using assisted reproductive technologies, fundamental questions remain; e.g., How do the sperm and egg DNA unite? Does ICSI have consequences that IVF does not? Here, pronuclear and mitotic events in nonhuman primate zygotes leading to the establishment of polarity are investigated by multidimensional time-lapse video microscopy and immunocytochemistry. Multiplane videos after ICSI show atypical sperm head displacement beneath the oocyte cortex and eccentric para-tangential pronuclear alignment compared to IVF zygotes. Neither fertilization procedure generates incorporation cones. At frst interphase, apposed pronuclei align obliquely to the animal-vegetal axis after ICSI, with asymmetric furrows assembling from the male pronucleus. Furrows form within 30° of the animal pole, but typically, not through the ICSI injection site. Membrane fow drives polar bodies and the ICSI site into the furrow. Mitotic spindle imaging suggests para-tangential pronuclear orientation, which initiates random spindle axes and minimal spindle:cortex interactions. Parthenogenetic pronuclei drift centripetally and assemble astral spindles lacking cortical interactions, leading to random furrows through the animal pole. Conversely, androgenotes display cortex-only pronuclear interactions mimicking ICSI. First cleavage axis determination in primates involves dynamic cortex-microtubule interactions among male pronuclei, centrosomal microtubules, and the animal pole, but not the ICSI site. With perhaps ten million ART babies now, fundamental problems regarding the mechanisms of fertilization and the onset of early development remain.
    [Show full text]
  • Embryogenesis and Blastocyst Development After Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in Nonhuman Primates: Overcoming Defects Caused by Meiotic Spindle Extraction$
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Developmental Biology 276 (2004) 237–252 www.elsevier.com/locate/ydbio Embryogenesis and blastocyst development after somatic cell nuclear transfer in nonhuman primates: overcoming defects caused by meiotic spindle extraction$ Calvin Simerlya,b,1, Christopher Navaraa,b,1, Sang Hwan Hyuna,b,1, Byeong Chun Leec, Sung Keun Kangc, Saverio Capuanoa,b, Gabriella Gosmana,b, Tanja Dominko2, Kowit-Yu Chonga,b, Duane Comptond, Woo Suk Hwangc, Gerald Schattena,b,* aDepartment of Obstetrics-Gynecology-Reproductive Sciences, Pittsburgh Development Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 204 Craft Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA bDepartment of Cell Biology-Physiology, Pittsburgh Development Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 204 Craft Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA cDepartment of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea dDepartment of Biochemistry, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755, USA Received for publication 13 August 2004, revised 28 September 2004, accepted 12 October 2004 Abstract Therapeutic cloning or nuclear transfer for stem cells (NTSC) seeks to overcome immune rejection through the development of embryonic stem cells (ES cells) derived from cloned blastocysts. The successful derivation of a human embryonic stem cell (hESC) line from blastocysts generated by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) provides proof-of-principle for btherapeutic cloning,Q though immune matching of the differentiated NT-hES remains to be established. Here, in nonhuman primates (NHPs; rhesus and cynomologus macaques), the strategies used with human SCNT improve NHP-SCNT development significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Implementation of the Federal Stem Cell Research Policy
    S. HRG. 107–874 STATUS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FEDERAL STEM CELL RESEARCH POLICY HEARING BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SPECIAL HEARING SEPTEMBER 25, 2002—WASHINGTON, DC Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 85–408 PDF WASHINGTON : 2003 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii TED STEVENS, Alaska ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania TOM HARKIN, Iowa PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri HARRY REID, Nevada MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CONRAD BURNS, Montana PATTY MURRAY, Washington RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas JACK REED, Rhode Island MIKE DEWINE, Ohio TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director CHARLES KIEFFER, Deputy Staff Director STEVEN J. CORTESE, Minority Staff Director LISA SUTHERLAND, Minority Deputy Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENTS OF LABOR, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES TOM HARKIN, Iowa, Chairman ERNEST F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male- Female Roles Author(S): Emily Martin Reviewed Work(S): Source: Signs, Vol
    The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male- Female Roles Author(s): Emily Martin Reviewed work(s): Source: Signs, Vol. 16, No. 3 (Spring, 1991), pp. 485-501 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3174586 . Accessed: 06/04/2012 21:00 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Signs. http://www.jstor.org THE EGG AND THE SPERM:HOW SCIENCEHAS CONSTRUCTED A ROMANCEBASED ON STEREOTYPICAL MALE-FEMALEROLES EMILYMARTIN The theory of the human body is always a part of a world- picture.... The theory of the human body is always a part of a fantasy. [JAMESHILLMAN, The Myth of Analysis]' As an anthropologist, I am intrigued by the possibility that culture shapes how biological scientists describe what they discover about the naturalworld. If this were so, we would be learning about more than the natural world in high school biology class; we would be learning about cultural beliefs and practices as if they were part of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Keith Roberts Porter: 1912–1997
    Keith Roberts Porter: 1912–1997 eith Roberts Porter died on May 2, 1997, just over a month short of his 85th birthday. He had the K perspicacity, good fortune, and patience to take advantage of the fast moving frontier of analytical biology after the Second World War to provide many of the tech- niques and experimental approaches that established the new field of biomedical research now known as cell biol- ogy. He was renowned for taking the first electron micro- graph of an intact cell, but his contributions went far be- yond that seminal instance. They ranged from technical developments, such as the roller flask for cell culture and the Porter-Blum ultramicrotome, to experimental and ob- servational achievements, such as studies on the synthesis and assembly of collagen, on the role of coated vesicles in endocytosis, on lipid digestion in the intestine, and on the universality of the 9 1 2 axoneme in cilia. The initial ultra- structure descriptions of the endoplasmic reticulum and the sarcoplasmic reticulum, identification of the role of T-tubules in excitation–contraction coupling in muscle and the role of the cytoskeleton in cell transformation and shape change, were his, as were many other contributions, described in some detail elsewhere (Peachey and Brinkley, 1983; Moberg, 1996). Absent from this list are his early pi- oneering work establishing the androgenetic haploid in frogs, an exercise in nuclear transplantation with conse- quences for the recent cloning of mammals, and his later ad- ventures with pigment migration in fish chromatophores. In addition to his specific scientific contributions, Keith Porter also made more important philosophical contribu- tions to the field that he helped to shape.
    [Show full text]