Genetic Variation in Prairie Populations of Melano Plus San Guinipes, the Migratory Grasshopper

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Heredity 56 (1986) 397-408 The Genetical Society of Great Britain Received 20 September 1985 Genetic variation in prairie populations of Melano plus San guinipes, the migratory grasshopper W. Chapco and M. J. Bidochka Department of Biology, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4S 0A2. Genetic variation at two visible loci and 10 electrophoretic loci in populations of the migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes, in the Canadian prairies is described. Tibia colour and femoral stripe loci exhibit considerable geographic variation in frequency. Multiple regression and correlation analyses revealed dma! variation patterns for tibia colour, with minimum annual temperature accounting for about 40 per cent of that variation. The possible direct and indirect effects of this factor are discussed. No spatial patterns were evinced for the femoral stripe locus despite its close linkage to the tibia colour gene. Whatever the nature of selection, coefficients must be large enough to maintain polymorphism and divergence in opposition to the swamping effects of gene flow. This does not appear to be the case for the allozyme loci; frequencies of the most common allele at each locus are high (average heterozygosity =45per cent) and about the same at each location. Tte mean level of polymorphism, 378 per cent, is well within the range of most insects. The migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus to an agricultural ecosystem, which according to sanguinipes (formerly known as M. bilituratus, many (e.g., Roffey, 1970; Turnock, 1977) coincided M. mexicanus and M. atlantis—see Gurney, 1962), with—some say caused—the extinction of the most is widely distributed throughout North America, destructive grasshopper in North America, the occupying (particularly sandy aspects of) a variety Rocky Mountain grasshopper, M. spretus. During of habitats such as grasslands, roadsides, open this century, M. sanguinipes has enjoyed, at areas in forests and even northern tundra (Vickery irregular intervals, massive outbreaks in numbers, and Kevan, 1983). This, in part, is attributable to which today can be predicted largely on the basis the insect's polyphagia (Mulkern et aL, 1969; of climatic conditions (Gage et a!., 1976; Gage and Vickery and Kevan, 1983) and reported capacity Mukerji, 1977). As is typical for most members of to migrate over long distances (Parker et aL, 1955; the Orthopteran order, information on the popula- Johnson, 1969; Vickery and Kevan, 1983). Given tion genetics of M. sanguinipes is patchy (Chapco, these features one might, therefore, expect the 1983b). While there is certainly no shortage of species to be fairly rich genetically depending on reports on phenotypic variability for this species the amount of gene flow. Migratory proclivities (Shotwell, 1930; Gurney and Brooks, 1959), until need not be translated into gene flow effects recently only the polymorphism, in hind tibia (Endler, 1977), but in M. sanguinipes, at least, there colour (red versus blue), has been genetically is good evidence from past records of outbreak researched (King and Slifer, 1955; the locus was periods that migrating females do deposit eggs labelled T by Chapco, 1980a). Brooks' (1958) contributing to the next year's pullulation (Parker classification and Gurney and Brooks' (1959) et a!., 1955). Also based on historical accounts, it monograph on the genus Melanoplus give several is reasonable to assume that the current population qualitative accounts of the geographical distribu- structure was engendered by the development of tion of tibia colour variants. In Canada, the red agriculture on the prairies over a century ago, form is predominant in Quebec, Ontario, British settlement and cultivation providing both suitable Columbia and the prairie parklands (the "more pod laying sites and succulent food (Bird, 1961; humid part"), whereas the blue form is pre- Roffey, 1970; Turnock, 1977). M. sanguinipes was dominant in the prairie grasslands. No distribution probably spottily distributed prior to the transition maps are provided, although Brooks (1958) does 398 W. CHAPCO AND M. J. BIDOCHKA state that the blue form is "usually confined to a tibia allele (TR)decreaseswith about a three-fold narrow strip south of a line from Medicine Hat, drop occurring from the Manitoba-Saskatchewan Alta. to Brandon, Man., but after a series of 'good' border near Ebenezer (51° 22', 102° 27'), located in grasshopper years, or in local dry spots, this form the aspen-parkland to Regina (50° 25', 104° 35'), predominates on the grasslands". Based on rearing located in the grassland area (Chapco, 1983a). studies, Brett (1947) claimed that high humidity Since no material was obtained between these two and high temperature (also the consuming of let- points, it is not known whether the changes are tuce and corn) "produce" a preponderance of abrupt or smooth. Also examined were the distri- individuals with red caudal tibiae. The results are butions of three other traits whose genetics have taken as experimental confirmation of Hebard's previously been worked out: red back (Prolocus), (1925) assertion that in South Dakota, the red femoral stripe (Ostlocus)and lactate dehy- forms are more frequent in the "more humid sec- drogenase (Ldh locus) (Chapco, 1980a; 1980b; tions of the state; elsewhere in more arid areas, 1984). Ost exhibits considerable geographical vari- hind tibiae are mostly glaucous". Brett's experi- ation; Pro is uniformly rare everywhere; and the ments, unfortunately, are difficult to evaluate since most common Ldh allele is uniformly frequent in information on source of material, and in some all sampled areas. cases, sample sizes, and proper controls are The present study concentrates on the southern lacking. Saskatchewan area in order to (a) establish the In a preliminary survey of several North nature of the TR dine, (b) test statistically the American populations, it was shown that from hypothesis, suggested by the literature, that the Quebec to Saskatchewan, the frequency of the red distribution of T' is connected to moisture and Table 1 Red tibia colour and femoral stripe allelic frequencies at 32 prairie locations Latitude Longitude Locality ('North) ('West) N %TR %Ost 1.Carnduff 4917 10183 254 14 53 2.Oxbow 4923 10218 115 13 56 3.Mankota" 4942 10707 74 11 28 4.Pangman 4965 10463 111 13 62 5.Kayville 4973 10517 42 20 65 6.Assiniboja* 4963 10598 125 12 38 7. Ormiston* 4975 10537 185 12 69 8.Bateman 5002 10675 71 12 71 9.Gull Lake 5013 10845 78 12 58 10. Rowatt 5033 10462 184 11 38 11.Whitewood 5033 10425 106 25 60 12. Jameson* 5042 10228 104 19 33 13.Grenfell 5042 10293 100 31 65 14.Indian Head* 5053 10367 148 16 33 15.Stockholm 5067 10225 51 20 72 16.Keeler 5070 10585 55 16 44 17.Bethune 5072 10513 186 12 44 18.Russell 5077 10128 48 25 62 19.Tugaske 5088 10627 173 13 59 20.Melville* 5092 10280 55 44 34 21.Craik 5105 10582 80 8 45 22.Roblin 5120 10145 46 58 100 23.Yorkton* 5122 10247 56 31 31 24.Springside 5135 10275 15 42 42 25.Ebenezer 5137 10245 345 41 31 26.Outlook 5150 10705 72 17 49 27.Good Spirit Lake Park 5157 10265 20 50 68 28.Canora* 5162 10243 51 46 30 29.Harris 5173 10745 34 18 21 30.Preeceville* 5197 10267 77 53 29 31. Biggar 52'07 10800 135 23 48 32.Hague 5250 10642 110 21 41 *Sites also sampled for variation. GENETIC VARIATION IN GRASSHOPPER POPULATIONS 399 temperature, and (c) by including several other trophorsis. A portion of the eviscerated tissue was loci, mostly electrophoretic, lay the foundation for stored at —70°C for later analysis. Two gel buffer discovering the genetic structure of what appears systems were used: (1) 0375 M tris HC1, pH 89 to be a continuously distributed species. The results (for LDH, MDH, G-6PD, ODH, SDH, ODH and should provide an interesting antithesis to the few SOD) and (2) O1 M tris borate with 2mM EDTA allozyme studies that have tended to concentrate (pH 89) for aGPDH-1, aGPDH-2, XDH, GLDH on acridids of low mobility (Tepper, 1979; Daly and ME. A 05 M tris glycine (pH 8.9) running et a!., 1981; Gill, 1981a; 1981b; 1981c). buffer was used throughout. The stains for XDH, G-6PD and SDH were essentially the same as those described by Shaw and Prasad (1970); SOD, ME, MATERIALS AND METHODS aGPDH-2 and ODH were stained (with some slight modifications) according to Ayala et al. (1972);LDH and MDH were stained according Collection to Chapco (1984), 50mg malic acid substituting Adult M. sanguinipes, scored for visible poly- for lactic acid in the latter case. Gels were run at morphisms, were collected between the months of 7 per cent acrylamide and electrophoresis per- July and August, 1978 to 1984, from 30 different formed for 2 hours at 250 volts. localities in southern Saskatchewan; two localities were in Manitoba (table 1). For electrophoretic analysis, grasshoppers from nine of the sites Analysis (marked with an asterisk in the table), situated Allelicfrequencies were estimated by gene count- along a climatic gradient (Richards and Fung, ing in the case of the enzyme loci (all alleles proved 1969) that extends from the generally hot and dry to be codominant) and in the case of the two colour (summer) short grass prairie in the south-west to traits, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assumed the relatively cooler and moister aspen parkiand and the frequencies of the dominant alleles esti- in the north-east, were sampled in 1982; three mated by taking the square-root of the correspond- places were resampled in 1983. Collections were ing recessive phenotypic frequencies and subtract- made using a sweep net, usually along roadsides ing the values from 1. and/or adjacent fields. Locations were compared by applying log- likelihood ratio tests or G-tests (Everitt, 1977) to 2 (phenotypes) x 32 (locations) contingency tables Traits in the case of the colour traits and to 2 (common Animalswere scored for two colour traits: hind allele versus "other" alleles pooled) x 9 (locations) tibia colour (red allele, T' dominant to blue allele, contingency tables in the case of the elec- TB)andhind femoral stripe (orange stripe allele, trophoretic traits.
Recommended publications
  • Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan

    Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan

    Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan March 2008 Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan BEXAR COUNTY KARST INVERTEBRATES DRAFT RECOVERY PLAN Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico March 2008 Approved: ___DRAFT_______________________________________ Regional Director, Southwest Region Date U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Concur: __DRAFT____________________________________________ Executive Director Date Texas Parks and Wildlife Department ii Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that the best available science indicates are necessary to recover or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), but are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans are guidance and planning documents only. Identification of an action to be implemented by any private or public party does not create a legal obligation beyond existing legal requirements. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement that any Federal agency obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act (U.S.C. 1341) or any other law or regulation. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the Service. They represent the official position of the Service only after the plan has been signed by the Regional Director as approved.
  • Grasshoppers

    Grasshoppers

    Grasshoppers Orthoptera: Acrididae Plains Lubber Pictured grasshoppers Great crested grasshopper Snakeweed grasshoppers Primary Pest Grasshoppers • Migratory grasshopper • Twostriped grasshopper • Differential grasshopper • Redlegged grasshopper • Clearwinged grasshopper Twostriped Grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus Redlegged Grasshopper, Melanoplus femurrubrum Differential Grasshopper, Melanoplus differentialis Migratory Grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes Clearwinged Grasshopper Camnula pellucida Diagram courtesy of Alexandre Latchininsky, University of Wyoming Photograph courtesy of Jean-Francoise Duranton, CIRAD Grasshoppers lay pods of eggs below ground Grasshopper Egg Pods Molting is not Linedfor wimps! bird grasshopper molting to adult stage Grasshopper Nymphs Some grasshoppers found in winter and early spring Velvet-striped grasshopper – a common spring species Grasshopper Controls • Weather (rainfall mediated primarily) • Natural enemies – Predators, diseases • Treatment of breeding areas • Biological controls • Row covers Temperature and rainfall are important mortality factors Grasshoppers and Rainfall Moisture prior to egg hatch generally aids survival – Newly hatched young need succulent foliage Moisture after egg hatch generally reduces problems – Assists spread of diseases – Allows for plenty of food, reducing competition for rangeland and crops Grasshopper predators Robber Flies Larvae of many blister beetles develop on grasshopper egg pods Blister beetle larva Fungus-killed Grasshoppers Pathogen: Entomophthora grylli Mermis
  • Spur-Throated Grasshoppers of the Canadian Prairies and Northern Great Plains

    Spur-Throated Grasshoppers of the Canadian Prairies and Northern Great Plains

    16 Spur-throated grasshoppers of the Canadian Prairies and Northern Great Plains Dan L. Johnson Research Scientist, Grassland Insect Ecology, Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, [email protected] The spur-throated grasshoppers have become the most prominent grasshoppers of North Ameri- can grasslands, not by calling attention to them- selves by singing in the vegetation (stridulating) like the slant-faced grasshoppers, or by crackling on the wing (crepitating) like the band-winged grasshoppers, but by virtue of their sheer num- bers, activities and diversity. Almost all of the spur-throated grasshoppers in North America are members of the subfamily Melanoplinae. The sta- tus of Melanoplinae is somewhat similar in South America, where the melanopline Dichroplus takes the dominant role that the genus Melanoplus pated, and hiding in the valleys?) scourge that holds in North America (Cigliano et al. 2000). wiped out so much of mid-western agriculture in The biogeographic relationships are analysed by the 1870’s. Chapco et al. (2001). The grasshoppers are charac- terized by a spiny bump on the prosternum be- Approximately 40 species of grasshoppers in tween the front legs, which would be the position the subfamily Melanoplinae (mainly Tribe of the throat if they had one. This characteristic is Melanoplini) can be found on the Canadian grass- easy to use; I know elementary school children lands, depending on weather and other factors af- who can catch a grasshopper, turn it over for a fecting movement and abundance. The following look and say “melanopline” before grabbing the notes provide a brief look at representative next.
  • Schutz Des Naturhaushaltes Vor Den Auswirkungen Der Anwendung Von Pflanzenschutzmitteln Aus Der Luft in Wäldern Und Im Weinbau

    Schutz Des Naturhaushaltes Vor Den Auswirkungen Der Anwendung Von Pflanzenschutzmitteln Aus Der Luft in Wäldern Und Im Weinbau

    TEXTE 21/2017 Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 UBA-FB 002461 Schutz des Naturhaushaltes vor den Auswirkungen der Anwendung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln aus der Luft in Wäldern und im Weinbau von Dr. Ingo Brunk, Thomas Sobczyk, Dr. Jörg Lorenz Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Tharandt Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes Impressum Herausgeber: Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 Fax: +49 340-2103-2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Durchführung der Studie: Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Professur für Forstzoologie, Prof. Dr. Mechthild Roth Pienner Straße 7 (Cotta-Bau), 01737 Tharandt Abschlussdatum: Januar 2017 Redaktion: Fachgebiet IV 1.3 Pflanzenschutz Dr. Mareike Güth, Dr. Daniela Felsmann Publikationen als pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen ISSN 1862-4359 Dessau-Roßlau, März 2017 Das diesem Bericht zu Grunde liegende Vorhaben wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit unter der Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 gefördert. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt dieser Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autorinnen und Autoren. UBA Texte Entwicklung geeigneter Risikominimierungsansätze für die Luftausbringung von PSM Kurzbeschreibung Die Bekämpfung
  • Elements for the Sustainable Management of Acridoids of Importance in Agriculture

    Elements for the Sustainable Management of Acridoids of Importance in Agriculture

    African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(2), pp. 142-152, 12 January, 2012 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.912 ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 Academic Journals Review Elements for the sustainable management of acridoids of importance in agriculture María Irene Hernández-Zul 1, Juan Angel Quijano-Carranza 1, Ricardo Yañez-López 1, Irineo Torres-Pacheco 1, Ramón Guevara-Gónzalez 1, Enrique Rico-García 1, Adriana Elena Castro- Ramírez 2 and Rosalía Virginia Ocampo-Velázquez 1* 1Department of Biosystems, School of Engineering, Queretaro State University, C.U. Cerro de las Campanas, Querétaro, México. 2Department of Agroecology, Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, México. Accepted 16 December, 2011 Acridoidea is a superfamily within the Orthoptera order that comprises a group of short-horned insects commonly called grasshoppers. Grasshopper and locust species are major pests of grasslands and crops in all continents except Antarctica. Economically and historically, locusts and grasshoppers are two of the most destructive agricultural pests. The most important locust species belong to the genus Schistocerca and populate America, Africa, and Asia. Some grasshoppers considered to be important pests are the Melanoplus species, Camnula pellucida in North America, Brachystola magna and Sphenarium purpurascens in northern and central Mexico, and Oedaleus senegalensis and Zonocerus variegatus in Africa. Previous studies have classified these species based on specific characteristics. This review includes six headings. The first discusses the main species of grasshoppers and locusts; the second focuses on their worldwide distribution; the third describes their biology and life cycle; the fourth refers to climatic factors that facilitate the development of grasshoppers and locusts; the fifth discusses the action or reaction of grasshoppers and locusts to external or internal stimuli and the sixth refers to elements to design management strategies with emphasis on prevention.
  • A Spur-Throat Grasshopper (Melanoplus Lemhiensis)

    A Spur-Throat Grasshopper (Melanoplus Lemhiensis)

    A Spur-throat Grasshopper Melanoplus lemhiensis Insecta — Orthoptera — Acrididae CONSERVATION STATUS / CLASSIFICATION Rangewide: Critically imperiled/Imperiled (G1G2) Statewide: Critically imperiled (S1) ESA: No status USFS: Region 1: No status; Region 4: No status BLM: No status IDFG: Not classified BASIS FOR INCLUSION Lack of essential information pertaining to status; Idaho endemic. TAXONOMY Hebard (1935) considered this species to be morphologically similar to M. artemisiae and M. salmonis. Hebard (1935) reported that both M. idaho and M. lemhiensis were collected on the same date and at the same location and that he did not recognize, in the field, that the observed male and female M. idaho individuals were different from M. lemhiensis. In later examination and description of both new species, M. idaho and M. lemhiensis, Hebard placed M. idaho in the montanus species group and M. lemhiensis in the artemisiae species group. Strohecker (1963) retained M. lemhiensis in the artemisiae species group. DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE This grasshopper is endemic to Idaho. The taxon is known from 1 locality in Lemhi County. No record of this species since its original collection during 1928 (Hebard 1935) is known. POPULATION TREND No data are available to suggest population trend. The species has not been recorded since 1928. HABITAT AND ECOLOGY Hebard (1935) reported that the series of specimens he collected were “secured on steep slopes of rock fragments thickly overgrown with sagebrush. The species was common only on the steepest upper slopes where there were many tufts of a fine, dry, yellow grass. The insect is a powerful though slow leaper …, but instead of immediately jumping into another bush individuals usually leaped about in the open and were consequently much easier to capture.
  • The Cytology of Tasmanian Short-Horned Grasshoppers ( Orthoptera: Acridoidea)

    The Cytology of Tasmanian Short-Horned Grasshoppers ( Orthoptera: Acridoidea)

    PAP. & PROC. ROY. Soc. TASMANIA. VOL. 86. (15TH SEPTEMBER. 1952.) The Cytology of Tasmanian Short-Horned Grasshoppers ( Orthoptera: Acridoidea) By G. B. SHARMAN Department of Botany, University of Tasmania* WITH 1 PLATE AND 57 TEXT FIGURES SUMMARY The cytology of twenty-six of the twenty-nine species of short-horned grass­ hoppers (superfamily Acridoidea) recorded from Tasmania is described. Intra­ specific cytological polymorphism is described in some species. Cytological evidence of phylogenetic relationships has been indicated where possible. INTRODUCTION Mainly because of their large size, and general suitability for cyto­ logical study the chromosomes of the short-horned grasshoppers (super­ family Acridoidea) have been the subject of wide research. In the largest and most widely studied family, the Acrididae, early workers (McClung, 1905; Davis, 1908) reported the male number as being uniformly twenty­ three rod-shaped chromosomes, but Granata (1910) showed that Pam­ phagus possessed nineteen rod-shaped chromosomes. With few exceptions an XO sex chromosome sy~tem is found. Later work has shown that one group of subfamilies of the Acrididae is characterised by the male diploid number of· nineteen rod-shaped chromosomes, whilst another and larger group is characterised by the male diploid number of twenty-three. These are usually called the ten and twelve chromosome groups, and correspond to the Chasmosacci and Cryptosacci groups of subfamilies (Roberts, 1941). Cytologically the Chasmosacci is a very uniform group as has been shown by Rao (1937) and Powers (1942). The twelve chromosome group, how­ ever, has some cytological variability. In more than forty genera the characteristic male diploid chromosome number of twenty-three is found (White, 1945) ; but" centric fusions" (White, 1945) have been responsible for lowering the chromosome number of some species, although the characteristic twenty-three arms are still found.
  • ARTICULATA 1993 8(2): 1 -22 SYSTEMATIK to the Knowledge Of

    ARTICULATA 1993 8(2): 1 -22 SYSTEMATIK to the Knowledge Of

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Articulata - Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V. DGfO Jahr/Year: 1993 Band/Volume: 8_2_1993 Autor(en)/Author(s): Storozhenko Sergey Artikel/Article: To the knowledge of the tribe Melanoplini (Orthoptera, Acrididae: Catantopinae) of the Eastern Palearctlca 1-22 Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V.; download http://www.dgfo-articulata.de/ ARTICULATA 1993 8(2): 1 -22 SYSTEMATIK To the knowledge of the tribe Melanoplini (Orthoptera, Acrididae: Catantopinae) of the Eastern Palearctlca Sergey Storozhenko Abstract Data on the grasshoppers of the tribe Melanoplini SCUDDER, 1897 (= Podismini JACOBSON, 1905 = Parapodisminae INOUE, 1985, syn. n) of Eastern Palearctica are given. Podisma kanoi sp. n. and Podisma sapporensis ashibetsuensis ssp. n. from Japan are described. The new synonyms are established: Rhinopodisma MISTSHENKO, 1954 = Aserratus HUANG, 1981, syn. n., Sinopodisma CHANG, 1940 = Pedopodisma ZHENG, 1980, syn. n., Parapodisma MISTSHENKO, 1947 = Pseudoparapodisma INOUE, 1985, syn. n., Monopterus FISCHER-WALDHEIM, 1846 = Bohemanella RAMME, 1951, syn.n. Tribe Melanoplini SCUDDER, 1897 Type genus: Melanoplus STAL, 1873. Notes The tribe Melanoplini was established by S.SCUDDER (1897) as a group Melanopli. JACOBSON (1905) proposed Podismini as a new name for this group. In the most modem classification the position of tribe Melanoplini is following: MISTSHENKO (1952) considered it as a tribe Podismini of subfamily Catanto­ pinae (Acrididae); UVAROV (1966) as Catantopinae (without division on tribes); DIRSH (1975) as subfamily Podisminae of family Catantopidae; HARZ (1975) as tribe Podismini of subfamily Catantopinae (Acrididae); VICKERY & KEVAN (1983) as subfamily Melanoplinae of family Acrididae with two tribes (Melanoplini and Podismini) and YIN (1984) as subfamily Podisminae of family Oedipodidae.
  • John Lowell Capinera

    John Lowell Capinera

    JOHN LOWELL CAPINERA EDUCATION: Ph.D. (entomology) University of Massachusetts, 1976 M.S. (entomology) University of Massachusetts, 1974 B.A. (biology) Southern Connecticut State University, 1970 EXPERIENCE: 2015- present, Emeritus Professor, Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida. 1987-2015, Professor and Chairman, Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida. 1985-1987, Professor and Head, Department of Entomology, Colorado State University. 1981-1985, Associate Professor, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Colorado State University. 1976-1981, Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Colorado State University. RESEARCH INTERESTS Grasshopper biology, ecology, distribution, identification and management Vegetable insects: ecology and management Terrestrial molluscs (slugs and snails): identification, ecology, and management RECOGNITIONS Florida Entomological Society Distinguished Achievement Award in Extension (1998). Florida Entomological Society Entomologist of the Year Award (1998). Gamma Sigma Delta (The Honor Society of Agriculture) Distinguished Leadership Award of Merit (1999). Elected Fellow of the Entomological Society of America (1999). Elected president of the Florida Entomological Society (2001-2002; served as vice president and secretary in previous years). “Handbook of Vegetable Pests,” authored by J.L. Capinera, named an ”Outstanding Academic Title for 2001” by Choice Magazine, a reviewer of publications for university and research libraries. “Award of Recognition” by the Entomological Society of America Formal Vegetable Insect Conference for publication of Handbook of Vegetable Pests (2002) “Encyclopedia of Entomology” was awarded Best Reference by the New York Public Library (2004), and an Outstanding Academic Title by CHOICE (2003). “Field Guide to Grasshoppers, Katydids, and Crickets of the United States” co-authored by J.L. Capinera received “Starred Review” book review in 2005 from Library Journal, a reviewer of library materials.
  • The Feasibility of Use of Caecal and Diverticular Coloration in Field Determination of Grasshopper Diet

    The Feasibility of Use of Caecal and Diverticular Coloration in Field Determination of Grasshopper Diet

    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 4 Number 1 -- Spring 1971 Number 1 -- Spring Article 4 1971 July 2017 The Feasibility of Use of Caecal and Diverticular Coloration in Field Determination of Grasshopper Diet Michael Tyrkus Wayne State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Tyrkus, Michael 2017. "The Feasibility of Use of Caecal and Diverticular Coloration in Field Determination of Grasshopper Diet," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 4 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol4/iss1/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Tyrkus: The Feasibility of Use of Caecal and Diverticular Coloration in F THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 4, No. 1 THE FEASIBILITY OF USE OF CAECAL AND DIVERTICULAR COLORATION IN FIELD DETERMINATION OF GRASSHOPPER DIET',' Michael Tyrkus Department of Biology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202 INTRODUCTION Many studies have been undertaken in the past on the food selection, food preferences, and economic damage of various grasshoppers and their allies. Among the more salient of these researches are those of Anderson (1961, 1964); Ball (1 936); Bindra (1958); Boldyrev (1928); Blackith and Blackith (1966); Brues (1946); Chapman (1957); Dibble (1940); Gangwere (1959, 1960, 1961, 1965, 1965a, 1966, 1966a, 1967);Husain etal. (1946); Isely (1938, 1946); Isely and Alexander (1949); Joyce (1952); Mulkern and Anderson (1959); Mulkern, Anderson, and Brusven (1962); Mulkern et al.
  • Forms of Melanoplus Bowditchi (Orthoptera: Acrididae) Collected from Different Host Plants Are Indistinguishable Genetically and in Aedeagal Morphology

    Forms of Melanoplus Bowditchi (Orthoptera: Acrididae) Collected from Different Host Plants Are Indistinguishable Genetically and in Aedeagal Morphology

    Forms of Melanoplus bowditchi (Orthoptera: Acrididae) collected from diVerent host plants are indistinguishable genetically and in aedeagal morphology Muhammad Irfan Ullah1,4 , Fatima Mustafa1,5 , Kate M. Kneeland1, Mathew L. Brust2, W. Wyatt Hoback3,6 , Shripat T. Kamble1 and John E. Foster1 1 Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA 2 Department of Biology, Chadron State College, Chadron, NE, USA 3 Department of Biology, University of Nebraska, Kearney, NE, USA 4 Current aYliation: Department of Entomology, University of Sargodha, Pakistan 5 Current aYliation: Department of Entomology, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan 6 Current aYliation: Entomology and Plant Pathology Department, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA ABSTRACT The sagebrush grasshopper, Melanoplus bowditchi Scudder (Orthoptera: Acrididae), is a phytophilous species that is widely distributed in the western United States on sagebrush species. The geographical distribution of M. bowditchi is very similar to the range of its host plants and its feeding association varies in relation to sagebrush dis- tribution. Melanoplus bowditchi bowditchi Scudder and M. bowditchi canus Hebard were described based on their feeding association with diVerent sagebrush species, sand sagebrush and silver sagebrush, respectively. Recently, M. bowditchi have been observed feeding on other plant species in western Nebraska. We collected adult M. bowditchi feeding on four plant species, sand sagebrush, Artemisia filifolia, big sagebrush, A. tridentata, fringed sagebrush, A. frigidus, and winterfat, Kraschenin- Submitted 10 January 2014 nikovia lanata. We compared the specimens collected from the four plant species for Accepted 17 May 2014 Published 10 June 2014 their morphological and genetic diVerences. We observed no consistent diVerences among the aedeagal parameres or basal rings among the grasshoppers collected Corresponding author W.
  • Karst Preserve Design Recommendations March 1, 2012

    Karst Preserve Design Recommendations March 1, 2012

    Karst Preserve Design Recommendations U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office 10711 Burnet Rd. Suite #200 Austin, TX 78758 July 28, 2011 Revised March 1, 2012 Karst Preserve Design Recommendations March 1, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1 2.0 KARST PRESERVE DESIGN ...............................................................................................1 2.1 Karst Preserve Quality Definitions ........................................................................................3 2.2 Karst Preserve Design Checklist ............................................................................................4 2.3 Karst Preserve Design Recommendations .............................................................................4 2.3.1 Karst Preserve Size........................................................................................................5 2.3.2 Karst Preserve Shape and Configuration.......................................................................5 2.3.3 Cave Size and Climate Change......................................................................................5 2.3.4 Biotic Components of the Karst Ecosystem..................................................................5 2.3.5 Abiotic Components of the Karst Ecosystem…............................................................6 2.3.6 Other Considerations.....................................................................................................7