DOCSLIB.ORG

Impact of Space Weather on Climate and Habitability of Terrestrial-Type

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impact of Space Weather on Climate and Habitability of Terrestrial-Type International Journal of Impact of space weather on climate and Astrobiology habitability of terrestrial-type exoplanets cambridge.org/ija V. S. Airapetian1,2 , R. Barnes3, O. Cohen4, G. A. Collinson1, W. C. Danchi1, C. F. Dong5, A. D. Del Genio6, K. France7, K. Garcia-Sage1, A. Glocer1, N. Gopalswamy1, J. L. Grenfell8, G. Gronoff9, M. Güdel10, K. Herbst11, Review W. G. Henning1, C. H. Jackman1, M. Jin12, C. P. Johnstone10, L. Kaltenegger13, Cite this article: Airapetian VS et al (2019). 11 14 1 15 16 10 Impact of space weather on climate and C. D. Kay , K. Kobayashi , W. Kuang ,G.Li , B. J. Lynch , T. Lüftinger , habitability of terrestrial-type exoplanets. J. G. Luhmann16, H. Maehara17, M. G. Mlynczak9, Y. Notsu18, R. A. Osten30, International Journal of Astrobiology 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550419000132 R. M. Ramirez19, S. Rugheimer20, M. Scheucher21, J. E. Schlieder1, K. Shibata22, Received: 27 December 2018 C. Sousa-Silva23, V. Stamenković24, R. J. Strangeway25, A. V. Usmanov1,26, Revised: 14 May 2019 24 24 27 28 6 Accepted: 14 May 2019 P. Vergados , O. P. Verkhoglyadova , A. A. Vidotto , M. Voytek ,M.J.Way, 15 29 Key words: G. P. Zank and Y. Yamashiki astrobiology; atmospheres; biosignatures; chemistry; CME; exoplanets; flares; 1Sellers Exoplanet Environments Collaboration, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD, USA; 2Department of Physics, habitability; internal dynamics; magnetic field; American University, Washington, DC, USA; 3University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; 4Lowell Center for SEP; space weather; stars; Sun Space Science and Technology, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA; 5Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA; 6NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA; Author for correspondence: 7Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, 600 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USA; V. S. Airapetian, 8 E-mail: [email protected] Department of Extrasolar Planets and Atmospheres (EPA), Institute for Planetary Research, German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Rutherfordstr. 2, 12489 Berlin, Adlershof, Germany; 9NASA/LaRC, Hampton, VA, USA; 10Department of Astrophysics, University of Vienna, Türkenschanzstr. 17, 1180, Vienna, Austria; 11Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institute for Experimental and Applied Physics, Leibnizstr. 11, 24118 Kiel, Germany; 12SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA; 13Carl Sagan Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA; 14Department of Chemistry, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan; 15Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research (CSPAR), University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA; 16Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA; 17Subaru Telescope Okayama Branch Office, NAOJ, Asakuchi, Okayama 719-02, Japan; 18Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan; 19Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan; 20Centre for Exoplanet Science, University of St. Andrews, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Irvine Building, North Street, St. Andrews, KY16 9AL, UK; 21Zentrum für Astronomie und Astrophysik, Technische Universität Berlin, D-10623 Berlin, Germany; 22Astronomical Observatory, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan; 23Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; 24NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA; 25University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 26University of Delaware, DE 19716, USA; 27Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; 28NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC, USA; 29Graduate School of Advanced Integrated Studies in Human Survivability (GSAIS), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan and 30Space Telescope Science Institute & Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA Abstract The search for life in the Universe is a fundamental problem of astrobiology and modern sci- ence. The current progress in the detection of terrestrial-type exoplanets has opened a new avenue in the characterization of exoplanetary atmospheres and in the search for biosignatures of life with the upcoming ground-based and space missions. To specify the conditions favour- able for the origin, development and sustainment of life as we know it in other worlds, we need to understand the nature of global (astrospheric), and local (atmospheric and surface) environments of exoplanets in the habitable zones (HZs) around G-K-M dwarf stars including our young Sun. Global environment is formed by propagated disturbances from the planet- hosting stars in the form of stellar flares, coronal mass ejections, energetic particles and winds collectively known as astrospheric space weather. Its characterization will help in under- standing how an exoplanetary ecosystem interacts with its host star, as well as in the specifi- cation of the physical, chemical and biochemical conditions that can create favourable and/or detrimental conditions for planetary climate and habitability along with evolution of planetary internal dynamics over geological timescales. A key linkage of (astro)physical, chemical and geological processes can only be understood in the framework of interdisciplinary studies © Cambridge University Press 2019 with the incorporation of progress in heliophysics, astrophysics, planetary and Earth sciences. The assessment of the impacts of host stars on the climate and habitability of terrestrial (exo) planets will significantly expand the current definition of the HZ to the biogenic zone and provide new observational strategies for searching for signatures of life. The major goal of ")!"$" &&#% ))) $"$"$%"$#&&$"!' & %'&&"& $"$&$ %"'%(& &&#% ))) $"$"$&$ %&&#% ""$ 2 V. S. Airapetian et al. this paper is to describe and discuss the current status and recent progress in this interdiscip- linary field in light of presentations and discussions during the NASA Nexus for Exoplanetary System Science funded workshop ‘Exoplanetary Space Weather, Climate and Habitability’ and to provide a new roadmap for the future development of the emerging field of exoplanetary science and astrobiology. is habitable at its surface, not only do we need to understand Introduction the changes in the chemistry of its atmosphere due to the penetra- The recent explosion of the number of planets detected around tion of energetic particles and their interaction with constituent other stars (exoplanets, currently over 4000) by space- and molecules, but also the loss of neutral and ionic species, and the ground-based missions created a great leap in the progress of addition of molecules due to outgassing from volcanic and tectonic the fields of exoplanetary science and astrobiology. These observa- activity. These effects will produce a net gain or loss to the surface tions provide a boost to scientifically addressing one of the major pressure and this will affect the surface temperature, as well as a net questions of modern science ‘Are we alone in the Universe?’. change in molecular chemistry. Therefore, due to the complexity of Although the answer to this question is unknown, the Kepler the problem, we should work with a set of interlinked research Space Telescope’s discoveries of terrestrial-type (rocky) exoplanets questions, all of which contribute pieces to the answer, with within circumstellar habitable zones (CHZs, the regions where contributions from various disciplines involved in each topic. standing bodies of liquid water can be present on the exoplanetary To quantify the effects of stellar ionizing radiation including surface) around main-sequence stars have provided an important soft X-ray and extreme ultraviolet, EUV (100–920 Å), later step in addressing this difficult question. An ongoing issue relates referred to as XUV fluxes from superflares detected by the to how well the classical CHZ as calculated by Kasting et al. Kepler mission on exoplanetary systems, specifically, on close-in (1993) and revisited by Kopparapu et al.(2013) relates to the exoplanets around low luminosity M dwarf stars, we need to actual physico-chemical conditions required for the origin, devel- examine what do we know about the impact of SW from our opment and support of life as we know it within so-called own star on Venus, Mars and Earth, the only inhabited planet ‘Biogenic Zones’ (Airapetian et al., 2016)or‘Abiogenesis Zones’ known to us. How can we apply lessons learned from the extreme (Rimmer et al., 2018). SW events to understand how exoplanets are affected by their host With growing numbers of NASA (National Aeronautics and stars? Can heliophysics science with its methodologies and mod- Space Administration) and ESA (European Space Agency) exopla- els developed to describe the effects of solar flares, CMEs as the netary missions such as the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite factors of SW, on Venus, Earth and Mars be expanded to address (TESS), the upcoming James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the extreme conditions on exoplanets around young solar-like Characterizing ExOPlanet Satellite (CHEOPS), the PLAnetary stars and close-in exoplanets around active F, G, K and M dwarfs? Transits and Oscillations of stars (PLATO), the Atmospheric These questions are of critical importance as the major factors of Remote-sensing Infrared Exoplanet Large-Survey (ARIEL) mis- habitability of exoplanets. sions, in the relatively near term we will be better equipped In this
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Lonely Planet Lost in Space
    SPACE SCOOP NEWS FROM ACROSS THE UNIVERSE 14A LonelyНоември Planet2012 Lost in Space A rogue planet has been spotted wandering alone through space with no parent star in sight! The little orphan is thought to have formed in the same way as normal planets: from the leftover material around a young star. But for some reason this planet got kicked out of its home. Planets don't shine with their own light. If you've ever seen Venus, Mars or Jupiter in the night sky, you're actually seeing light from the Sun (the star closest to Earth) reflecting off them. Since rogue planets aren’t close to any stars, they don’t reflect any starlight making them very difficult to spot. Astronomers actually think these wandering worlds might be more common than stars in our Galaxy, but we just have a hard time spotting them! It's always tricky trying to calculate the size of objects so far away in space. Try looking at a boat on the horizon and try to guess how far it is and how big it is! It's even harder when the object is very dark and floating through space. Astronomers admit that they might have misjudged the size of this little rogue — it might not even be a planet at all, but a Brown Dwarf! These are star-like objects that are much bigger than planets — up to about 80 times bigger than Jupiter — but too small to be stars. They don't burn fuel at their cores, like stars do, so they are too cold to shine brightly.
    [Show full text]
  • ROSAT PSPC Observations of the Infrared Quasar IRAS 13349
    Mon Not R Astron So c Printed August ROSAT PSPC observations of the infrared quasar IRAS evidence for a warm absorb er with internal dust WN Brandt AC Fabian and KA Pounds Institute of Astronomy Madingley Road Cambridge CB HA Internet wnbastcamacuk acfastcamacuk Xray Astronomy Group Department of Physics Astronomy University of Leicester University Road Leicester LE RH Internet kapstarleacuk ABSTRACT We present spatial temp oral and sp ectral analyses of ROSAT Position Sensitive Pro p ortional Counter PSPC observations of the infrared loud quasar IRAS IRAS is the archetypal highlyp olarized radioquiet QSO and has an op ticalinfrared luminosity of erg s We detect variability in the ROSAT count rate by a factor of in ab out one year and there is also evidence for p er cent variability within one week We nd no evidence for large intrinsic cold absorption of soft Xrays These two facts have imp ortant consequences for the scatteringplus transmission mo del of this ob ject which was developed to explain its high wavelength dep endent p olarization and other prop erties The soft Xray variability makes electron scattering of most of the soft Xrays dicult without a very p eculiar scattering mirror The lack of signicant intrinsic cold Xray absorption together with the large observed E B V suggests either a very p eculiar system geometry or more probably absorp tion by warm ionized gas with internal dust There is evidence for an ionized oxygen edge in the Xray sp ectrum IRAS has many prop erties that are similar to those
    [Show full text]
  • Grosvenor Prints CATALOGUE for the ABA FAIR 2008
    Grosvenor Prints 19 Shelton Street Covent Garden London WC2H 9JN Tel: 020 7836 1979 Fax: 020 7379 6695 E-mail: [email protected] www.grosvenorprints.com Dealers in Antique Prints & Books CATALOGUE FOR THE ABA FAIR 2008 Arts 1 – 5 Books & Ephemera 6 – 119 Decorative 120 – 155 Dogs 156 – 161 Historical, Social & Political 162 – 166 London 167 – 209 Modern Etchings 210 – 226 Natural History 227 – 233 Naval & Military 234 – 269 Portraits 270 – 448 Satire 449 – 602 Science, Trades & Industry 603 – 640 Sports & Pastimes 641 – 660 Foreign Topography 661 – 814 UK Topography 805 - 846 Registered in England No. 1305630 Registered Office: 2, Castle Business Village, Station Road, Hampton, Middlesex. TW12 2BX. Rainbrook Ltd. Directors: N.C. Talbot. T.D.M. Rayment. C.E. Ellis. E&OE VAT No. 217 6907 49 GROSVENOR PRINTS Catalogue of new stock released in conjunction with the ABA Fair 2008. In shop from noon 3rd June, 2008 and at Olympia opening 5th June. Established by Nigel Talbot in 1976, we have built up the United Kingdom’s largest stock of prints from the 17th to early 20th centuries. Well known for our topographical views, portraits, sporting and decorative subjects, we pride ourselves on being able to cater for almost every taste, no matter how obscure. We hope you enjoy this catalogue put together for this years’ Antiquarian Book Fair. Our largest ever catalogue contains over 800 items, many rare, interesting and unique images. We have also been lucky to purchase a very large stock of theatrical prints from the Estate of Alec Clunes, a well known actor, dealer and collector from the 1950’s and 60’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the January 25, 2010, Meeting of the Board of Regents
    MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 25, 2010, MEETING OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS ATTENDANCE This scheduled meeting of the Board of Regents was held on Monday, January 25, 2010, in the Regents’ Room of the Smithsonian Institution Castle. The meeting included morning, afternoon, and executive sessions. Board Chair Patricia Q. Stonesifer called the meeting to order at 8:31 a.m. Also present were: The Chief Justice 1 Sam Johnson 4 John W. McCarter Jr. Christopher J. Dodd Shirley Ann Jackson David M. Rubenstein France Córdova 2 Robert P. Kogod Roger W. Sant Phillip Frost 3 Doris Matsui Alan G. Spoon 1 Paul Neely, Smithsonian National Board Chair David Silfen, Regents’ Investment Committee Chair 2 Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Senators Thad Cochran and Patrick J. Leahy, and Representative Xavier Becerra were unable to attend the meeting. Also present were: G. Wayne Clough, Secretary John Yahner, Speechwriter to the Secretary Patricia L. Bartlett, Chief of Staff to the Jeffrey P. Minear, Counselor to the Chief Justice Secretary T.A. Hawks, Assistant to Senator Cochran Amy Chen, Chief Investment Officer Colin McGinnis, Assistant to Senator Dodd Virginia B. Clark, Director of External Affairs Kevin McDonald, Assistant to Senator Leahy Barbara Feininger, Senior Writer‐Editor for the Melody Gonzales, Assistant to Congressman Office of the Regents Becerra Grace L. Jaeger, Program Officer for the Office David Heil, Assistant to Congressman Johnson of the Regents Julie Eddy, Assistant to Congresswoman Matsui Richard Kurin, Under Secretary for History, Francisco Dallmeier, Head of the National Art, and Culture Zoological Park’s Center for Conservation John K.
    [Show full text]
  • Precollimator for X-Ray Telescope (Stray-Light Baffle) Mindrum Precision, Inc Kurt Ponsor Mirror Tech/SBIR Workshop Wednesday, Nov 2017
    Mindrum.com Precollimator for X-Ray Telescope (stray-light baffle) Mindrum Precision, Inc Kurt Ponsor Mirror Tech/SBIR Workshop Wednesday, Nov 2017 1 Overview Mindrum.com Precollimator •Past •Present •Future 2 Past Mindrum.com • Space X-Ray Telescopes (XRT) • Basic Structure • Effectiveness • Past Construction 3 Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com • XMM-Newton 1999 • Chandra 1999 • HETE-2 2000-07 • INTEGRAL 2002 4 ESA/NASA Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com • Swift 2004 • Suzaku 2005-2015 • AGILE 2007 • NuSTAR 2012 5 NASA/JPL/ASI/JAXA Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com • Astrosat 2015 • Hitomi (ASTRO-H) 2016-2016 • NICER (ISS) 2017 • HXMT/Insight 慧眼 2017 6 NASA/JPL/CNSA Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com NASA/JPL-Caltech Harrison, F.A. et al. (2013; ApJ, 770, 103) 7 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103 Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com Grazing Incidence 8 NASA/JPL-Caltech Basic Structure: NuSTAR Mirrors Mindrum.com 9 NASA/JPL-Caltech Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • XMM Newton XRT 10 ESA Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • XMM-Newton mirrors D. de Chambure, XMM Project (ESTEC)/ESA 11 Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • Thermal Precollimator on ROSAT 12 http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/ Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • AGILE Precollimator 13 http://agile.asdc.asi.it Basic Structure Mindrum.com • Spektr-RG 2018 14 MPE Basic Structure: Stray X-Rays Mindrum.com 15 NASA/JPL-Caltech Basic Structure: Grazing Mindrum.com 16 NASA X-Ray Effectiveness: Straylight Mindrum.com • Correct Reflection • Secondary Only • Backside Reflection • Primary Only 17 X-Ray Effectiveness Mindrum.com • The Crab Nebula by: ROSAT (1990) Chandra 18 S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evening Sky Map a DECEMBER 2018 N
    I N E D R I A C A S T N E O D I T A C L E O R N I G D S T S H A E P H M O O R C I . Z N O n i f d o P t o ) l a h O N r g i u s , o Z l t P h I C e r o N R ( I o r R r O e t p h C H p i L S t D E E a g r i . H ( B T F e O h T NORTH D R t h N e M e E s A G X O U e A H m M C T i . I n P i N d S L E E m P Z “ e E A N Dipper t e H O NORTHERN HEMISPHERE o M T R r T The Big The N Y s H h . E r o ” E K Alcor & e w ) t W S . s e . T u r T Mizar l E U p W C B e R e a N l W D k b E s T u T MAJOR W H o o The Evening Sky Map A DECEMBER 2018 n E C D O t FREE* EACH MONTH FOR YOU TO EXPLORE, LEARN & ENJOY THE NIGHT SKY URSA S e L h K h e t Y E m R d M A n o A a r Thuban S SKY MAP SHOWS HOW P Get Sky Calendar on Twitter n T 1 i n C A 3 E g R M J http://twitter.com/skymaps O Sky Calendar – December 2018 o d B THE NIGHT SKY LOOKS U M13 f n O N i D “ f L D e T DRACO A o c NE O I t I e T EARLY DEC PM T 8 m P t S i 3 Moon near Spica (morning sky) at 9h UT.
    [Show full text]
  • Explore the Universe Observing Certificate Second Edition
    RASC Observing Committee Explore the Universe Observing Certificate Second Edition Explore the Universe Observing Certificate Welcome to the Explore the Universe Observing Certificate Program. This program is designed to provide the observer with a well-rounded introduction to the night sky visible from North America. Using this observing program is an excellent way to gain knowledge and experience in astronomy. Experienced observers find that a planned observing session results in a more satisfying and interesting experience. This program will help introduce you to amateur astronomy and prepare you for other more challenging certificate programs such as the Messier and Finest NGC. The program covers the full range of astronomical objects. Here is a summary: Observing Objective Requirement Available Constellations and Bright Stars 12 24 The Moon 16 32 Solar System 5 10 Deep Sky Objects 12 24 Double Stars 10 20 Total 55 110 In each category a choice of objects is provided so that you can begin the certificate at any time of the year. In order to receive your certificate you need to observe a total of 55 of the 110 objects available. Here is a summary of some of the abbreviations used in this program Instrument V – Visual (unaided eye) B – Binocular T – Telescope V/B - Visual/Binocular B/T - Binocular/Telescope Season Season when the object can be best seen in the evening sky between dusk. and midnight. Objects may also be seen in other seasons. Description Brief description of the target object, its common name and other details. Cons Constellation where object can be found (if applicable) BOG Ref Refers to corresponding references in the RASC’s The Beginner’s Observing Guide highlighting this object.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Du Ciel Profond
    Guide du ciel profond Olivier PETIT 8 mai 2004 2 Introduction hjjdfhgf ghjfghfd fg hdfjgdf gfdhfdk dfkgfd fghfkg fdkg fhdkg fkg kfghfhk Table des mati`eres I Objets par constellation 21 1 Androm`ede (And) Andromeda 23 1.1 Messier 31 (La grande Galaxie d'Androm`ede) . 25 1.2 Messier 32 . 27 1.3 Messier 110 . 29 1.4 NGC 404 . 31 1.5 NGC 752 . 33 1.6 NGC 891 . 35 1.7 NGC 7640 . 37 1.8 NGC 7662 (La boule de neige bleue) . 39 2 La Machine pneumatique (Ant) Antlia 41 2.1 NGC 2997 . 43 3 le Verseau (Aqr) Aquarius 45 3.1 Messier 2 . 47 3.2 Messier 72 . 49 3.3 Messier 73 . 51 3.4 NGC 7009 (La n¶ebuleuse Saturne) . 53 3.5 NGC 7293 (La n¶ebuleuse de l'h¶elice) . 56 3.6 NGC 7492 . 58 3.7 NGC 7606 . 60 3.8 Cederblad 211 (N¶ebuleuse de R Aquarii) . 62 4 l'Aigle (Aql) Aquila 63 4.1 NGC 6709 . 65 4.2 NGC 6741 . 67 4.3 NGC 6751 (La n¶ebuleuse de l’œil flou) . 69 4.4 NGC 6760 . 71 4.5 NGC 6781 (Le nid de l'Aigle ) . 73 TABLE DES MATIERES` 5 4.6 NGC 6790 . 75 4.7 NGC 6804 . 77 4.8 Barnard 142-143 (La tani`ere noire) . 79 5 le B¶elier (Ari) Aries 81 5.1 NGC 772 . 83 6 le Cocher (Aur) Auriga 85 6.1 Messier 36 . 87 6.2 Messier 37 . 89 6.3 Messier 38 .
    [Show full text]
  • Exep Science Plan Appendix (SPA) (This Document)
    ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 1 of 61 Created By: David A. Breda Date Program TDEM System Engineer Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Nick Siegler Date Program Chief Technologist Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Concurred By: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology EXOPDr.LANET Douglas Hudgins E XPLORATION PROGRAMDate Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program ScienceScience Plan Mission DirectorateAppendix NASA Headquarters Karl Stapelfeldt, Program Chief Scientist Eric Mamajek, Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 JPL Document No: 1735632 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 2 of 61 Approved by: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager, Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory Dr. Douglas Hudgins Date Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters Created by: Dr. Karl Stapelfeldt Chief Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Eric Mamajek Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology This research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. © 2018 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 3 of 61 Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]