Bothriolepid Antiarchs (Vertebrata, Placodermi) from the Devonian of the North-Western Part of the East European Platform

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bothriolepid Antiarchs (Vertebrata, Placodermi) from the Devonian of the North-Western Part of the East European Platform Bothriolepid antiarchs (Vertebrata, Placodermi) from the Devonian of the north-western part of the East European Platform Erwin LUKŠEVIČS Institute of Geology, University of Latvia, Rainis Blvd 19 Rīga LV 1586 (Latvia) [email protected] [email protected] Lukševičs E. 2001. — Bothriolepid antiarchs (Vertebrata, Placodermi) from the Devonian of the north-western part of the East European Platform. Geodiversitas 23 (4) : 489-609. ABSTRACT A large collection of bothriolepid antiarch material from 26 localities in the north-western part of the East European Platform (Latvia, Lithuania, and the Leningrad, Novgorod, and Pskov regions of Russia) is described and illustrat- ed, with a critical treatment of previously described material. The genus Grossilepis Stensiö, 1948 is represented by two species, Grossilepis tuberculata (Gross, 1941) and G. spinosa (Gross, 1942). All remaining material is referred to the genus Bothriolepis Eichwald, 1840: B. prima Gross, 1942, B. obrutschewi Gross, 1942, B. cellulosa (Pander in Keyserling, 1846), B. pan- deri Lahusen, 1880, B. traudscholdi Jaekel, 1927, B. maxima Gross, 1933, B. evaldi Lyarskaja, 1986 come from the Givetian(?)-Frasnian deposits, and B. leptocheira curonica Gross, 1942, B. ornata Eichwald, 1840, B. jani Lukševičs, 1986, B. heckeri n. sp., B. ciecere Lyarskaja in Lyarskaja & Savvaitova, 1974 as well as one unnamed form come from the Famennian KEY WORDS sequence. The stratigraphic distribution of bothriolepids through the Vertebrata, Placodermi, Middle/Upper Devonian of the Main Devonian Field is clarified in a proposed antiarchs, new version of the vertebrate zonation. A cladistic analysis of the distribution Devonian, Baltic area, of several features within the family Bothriolepididae using the PHYLIP pro- biostratigraphy. gram package provides a new version of the interrelationships of bothriolepids. GEODIVERSITAS • 2001 • 23 (4) © Publications Scientifiques du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. www.mnhn.fr/publication/ 489 Lukševičs E. RÉSUMÉ Bothriolépides antiarches (Vertebrata, Placodermi) du Dévonien du nord- ouest de la plateforme est-européenne. Une large collection de Bothriolepididae de 26 gisements du nord-ouest de la plateforme est-européenne (Lettonie, Lithuanie, régions de Leningrad, Novgorod et Pskov de la Russie) est étudiée et figurée, avec un traitement cri- tique du matériel précédemment décrit. Le genre Grossilepis Stensiö, 1948 est représenté par deux espèces : Grossilepis tuberculata (Gross, 1941) et G. spinosa (Gross, 1942). Le reste du matériel est attribué au genre Bothriolepis Eichwald, 1948 : B. prima Gross, 1942, B. obrutschewi Gross, 1942, B. cellulosa (Pander in Keyserling, 1846), B. panderi Lahusen, 1880, B. traudscholdi Jaekel, 1927, B. maxima Gross, 1933, B. evaldi Lyarskaja, 1986 du Givétien (?)-Frasnien, et B. leptocheira curonica Gross, 1942, B. ornata Eichwald, 1840, B. jani Lukševičs, 1986, B. heckeri n. sp., B. ciecere Lyarskaja in Lyarskaja & Savvaitova, 1974, et MOTS CLÉS Vertebrata, une forme non nommée d’âge famennien. La répartition stratigraphique des Placodermi, Bothriolepididae du Dévonien moyen et supérieur du Champ Dévonien antiarches, Principal et une nouvelle division en zones ichthyologiques sont proposées. Une Dévonien, Baltique, analyse cladistique des Bothriolepidae utilisant le logiciel PHYLIP a déjà fourni biostratigraphie. une nouveau scheme de relations de parenté des bothriolépides. CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 491 Technique and terminology ............................................................................................................ 491 Historical account ............................................................................................................................ 494 Distribution and biostratigraphy .................................................................................................... 497 Lithologies, facies variations and vertebrate assemblages ............................................................ 499 Systematics ........................................................................................................................................ 505 Bothriolepis prima Gross, 1942 ....................................................................................................... 505 Bothriolepis obrutschewi Gross, 1942 ............................................................................................. 510 Bothriolepis cellulosa (Pander in Keyserling, 1846) ....................................................................... 517 Bothriolepis panderi Lahusen, 1880 ................................................................................................ 519 Bothriolepis traudscholdi Jaekel, 1927 ............................................................................................ 521 Bothriolepis maxima Gross, 1933 ................................................................................................... 534 Bothriolepis evaldi Lyarskaja, 1986 ................................................................................................ 539 Bothriolepis leptocheira Traquair, 1893 .......................................................................................... 544 Bothriolepis ornata Eichwald, 1840 ................................................................................................ 554 Bothriolepis jani Lukševičs, 1986 .................................................................................................... 569 Bothriolepis heckeri n. sp. ................................................................................................................ 577 Bothriolepis ciecere Lyarskaja in Lyarskaja & Savvaitova, 1974 .................................................. 578 Bothriolepis sp. indet. 1 .................................................................................................................... 594 Grossilepis Stensiö, 1948 .................................................................................................................. 595 Grossilepis tuberculata (Gross, 1941) ............................................................................................. 595 Grossilepis spinosa (Gross, 1942) ..................................................................................................... 598 Interrelationships of Baltic bothriolepids ...................................................................................... 598 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................... 603 References ......................................................................................................................................... 604 Appendix............................................................................................................................................ 609 490 GEODIVERSITAS • 2001 • 23 (4) Bothriolepids (Vertebrata, Placodermi) from the Devonian of Baltic INTRODUCTION describe and illustrate the armour structure of each species as completely as possible, because The family Bothriolepididae Cope, 1886 is the the members of the genus Bothriolepis are con- most diverse group of antiarchs in the western siderably variable in the shape of individual part of the East European Platform, represented plates and their overlap patterns as well as in the by at least 15 taxa. Subdivision of the Upper course of sensory line canals. Devonian of the Baltic region and north-west- The largest part of studied and described speci- ern part of Russia is based largely on fish data. mens was collected by J. Blesse, L. Lyarskaja, Bothriolepididae are very important for the cor- W. Gross, N. Delle, V. Sorokin, J. Upenieks and relation of Frasnian and Famennian deposits of the author, and is housed in the Latvian the Main Devonian Field of the East-European Museum of Natural History (Rīga). Other stud- Platform with similar strata elsewhere. The ied material is in the Paleontological Institute, genus Bothriolepis is of particular interest as it is Moscow (coll. D. Obruchev, R. Hecker, found in the Middle and Late Devonian deposits J. Eglons, N. Krupina, F. Chernyshov); Institute on all continents. of Geology of Lithuania, Vilnius (coll. Gross (1933, 1941, 1942), Lyarskaja (1978, 1981, V. Talimaa); Mining Museum, Saint-Petersburg 1986), Obruchev (1928, 1947, 1958, 1964), (coll. H. Helmersen, I. Lahusen, A. Olivieri); Karatajūte-Talimaa (1963, 1966) and others pro- Institute of the Earth Crust, St.-Petersburg (coll. vided lists of agnathans and fishes characteristic A. Ivanov, W. Ermolaew, S. Snigirevsky); for various Devonian beds in the Baltic and Museum of Geology of the University of Latvia, north-western part of Russia, described verte- Rīga (coll. N. Delle, R. Kampe); Natural brate assemblages and correlated some strata History Museum, London (coll. P. Egerton, with the Upper Devonian of other regions. Six J. Eglons, R. Gross); and the National Museum new species have been described from the Main of Scotland, Edinburgh (coll. R. Gross, Devonian Field since Stensiö’s (1948) major H. Trautschold, J. V. Rohon). revision of the Bothriolepididae. During prepa- ration of this work, a large amount of bothriole- pidid remains stored in the main museums of TECHNIQUE AND TERMINOLOGY Latvia, Lithuania, Russia and Great Britain was studied. A large
Recommended publications
  • JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS
    Neoceti Symposium, Saturday 8:45 acid-prepared osteolepiforms Medoevia and Gogonasus has offered strong support for BODY SIZE AND CRYPTIC TROPHIC SEPARATION OF GENERALIZED Jarvik’s interpretation, but Eusthenopteron itself has not been reexamined in detail. PIERCE-FEEDING CETACEANS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING DIVERSITY DUR- Uncertainty has persisted about the relationship between the large endoskeletal “fenestra ING THE RISE OF THE NEOCETI endochoanalis” and the apparently much smaller choana, and about the occlusion of upper ADAM, Peter, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; JETT, Kristin, Univ. of and lower jaw fangs relative to the choana. California, Davis, Davis, CA; OLSON, Joshua, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los A CT scan investigation of a large skull of Eusthenopteron, carried out in collaboration Angeles, CA with University of Texas and Parc de Miguasha, offers an opportunity to image and digital- Marine mammals with homodont dentition and relatively little specialization of the feeding ly “dissect” a complete three-dimensional snout region. We find that a choana is indeed apparatus are often categorized as generalist eaters of squid and fish. However, analyses of present, somewhat narrower but otherwise similar to that described by Jarvik. It does not many modern ecosystems reveal the importance of body size in determining trophic parti- receive the anterior coronoid fang, which bites mesial to the edge of the dermopalatine and tioning and diversity among predators. We established relationships between body sizes of is received by a pit in that bone. The fenestra endochoanalis is partly floored by the vomer extant cetaceans and their prey in order to infer prey size and potential trophic separation of and the dermopalatine, restricting the choana to the lateral part of the fenestra.
    [Show full text]
  • Tartu, 26.-27. September 2003 Elga Mark-Kurik Ja Jйri Nemliher Tallinna
    Eesti geoloogia uue sajandi kiinnisel 38 Tartu, 26.-27. september 2003 VEEL KORD КESK-DEVONI АВА V А КIНТIDEST Elga Mark-Kurik ja Jйri Nemliher Tallinna Tehnikatilikooli Geoloogia Instituut, Estonia pst. 7, 10143 Tallinn ([email protected]; [email protected]) Abava kihid on kauaaegse asendi tottu Kesk- ja Ulem-Devoni piiril pohjustanud rohkem vaidlusi kui mбni teine stratigraafiline tiksus Baltikumi Нibiloigetes. Selle asendiga seoses on neid kihte kasitletud kord iseseisva tiksusena (Liepins 1960, Mark-Kurik 1991), marksa sagedamini aga lasuva, Gauja lademe osana (Kurss et al. 1981, Mark-Kurik 1981) vбi lamava, Burtnieki lademe osana (Kleesment 1995, Kleesment & Mark-Kurik 1997, Vingisaar 1997). Abava kihtide kui Uksuse liitmist selle vбi teise kбrgemat jarku Uksusega on pбhjustanud antud Uksuse piiride, eriti Ulemise piiri ebamaarasus ning halb jalgitavus geoloogilisel kaш·distamisel (Kurik et al. 1989). Viimatimainitud asjaolu tottu loobus Kurss hiljem ( 1992) Abava kui iseseisva stratigraafilise tiksuse kasutamisest. Siiski ei saa mainimata jatta Abava kihtidele spetsiifilist kalafaunat, samuti selle tiksikelementide.laia levikut Ida­ Euroopa platvormil ning naaberaladel ja kaugemalgi ning nimetatud kihtide tllhtsust regioonidevahelise korrelatsiooni aspektist (Mark-Kurik 1991, Ahlberg et al. 1999, Mark-Kurik et al. 1999). Eestis kuuluvad Abava kihid Givet' ladejargu Burtnieki lademesse, moodustades selle kolmanda ehk Ulemise kihikompleksi. Кihtide paksus on 15,1-32 m. Need koosnevad heledavarvilisest peeneteralisest pбimjaskihilisest liivakivist, ka peeneteralisest hallist, rohekas- voi lillakashallist aleuroliidist. Aleuroliiti on antud Uksuses enam kui 25 %. Samuti esineb selles halli voi punakaspruuni savi. Kagu-Eesti puurstidamikes on Abava tasemelt leitud dolokivi ning domeriiti. Mineraloogiliselt on meie Vбhandu jбе aarsed paljandid ning Latis paiknev Lejeji paljand sarnased (Kleesment 1995). Eelpool mainitud paljand (stratottiiip) asub Kuramaal Venta jбgikonnas Abava jбе vasakul kaldal (suudmest 4 km Ulesvoolu) Lejeji talu vastas.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Tetrapod Relationships Revisited
    Biol. Rev. (2003), 78, pp. 251–345. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 251 DOI: 10.1017/S1464793102006103 Printed in the United Kingdom Early tetrapod relationships revisited MARCELLO RUTA1*, MICHAEL I. COATES1 and DONALD L. J. QUICKE2 1 The Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, 1027 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637-1508, USA ([email protected]; [email protected]) 2 Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL57PY, UK and Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW75BD, UK ([email protected]) (Received 29 November 2001; revised 28 August 2002; accepted 2 September 2002) ABSTRACT In an attempt to investigate differences between the most widely discussed hypotheses of early tetrapod relation- ships, we assembled a new data matrix including 90 taxa coded for 319 cranial and postcranial characters. We have incorporated, where possible, original observations of numerous taxa spread throughout the major tetrapod clades. A stem-based (total-group) definition of Tetrapoda is preferred over apomorphy- and node-based (crown-group) definitions. This definition is operational, since it is based on a formal character analysis. A PAUP* search using a recently implemented version of the parsimony ratchet method yields 64 shortest trees. Differ- ences between these trees concern: (1) the internal relationships of aı¨stopods, the three selected species of which form a trichotomy; (2) the internal relationships of embolomeres, with Archeria
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Basal Tetrapoda
    Stuart S. Sumida Biology 342 Phylogeny of Basal Tetrapoda The group of bony fishes that gave rise to land-dwelling vertebrates and their descendants (Tetrapoda, or colloquially, “tetrapods”) was the lobe-finned fishes, or Sarcopterygii. Sarcoptrygii includes coelacanths (which retain one living form, Latimeria), lungfish, and crossopterygians. The transition from sarcopterygian fishes to stem tetrapods proceeded through a series of groups – not all of which are included here. There was no sharp and distinct transition, rather it was a continuum from very tetrapod-like fishes to very fish-like tetrapods. SARCOPTERYGII – THE LOBE-FINNED FISHES Includes •Actinista (including Coelacanths) •Dipnoi (lungfishes) •Crossopterygii Crossopterygians include “tetrapods” – 4- legged land-dwelling vertebrates. The Actinista date back to the Devonian. They have very well developed lobed-fins. There remains one livnig representative of the group, the coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae. A lungfish The Crossopterygii include numerous representatives, the best known of which include Eusthenopteron (pictured here) and Panderichthyes. Panderichthyids were the most tetrapod-like of the sarcopterygian fishes. Panderichthyes – note the lack of dorsal fine, but retention of tail fin. Coelacanths Lungfish Rhizodontids Eusthenopteron Panderichthyes Tiktaalik Ventastega Acanthostega Ichthyostega Tulerpeton Whatcheeria Pederpes More advanced amphibians Tiktaalik roseae – a lobe-finned fish intermediate between typical sarcopterygians and basal tetrapods. Mid to Late Devonian; 375 million years old. The back end of Tiktaalik’s skull is intermediate between fishes and tetrapods. Tiktaalik is a fish with wrist bones, yet still retaining fin rays. The posture of Tiktaalik’s fin/limb is intermediate between that of fishes an tetrapods. Coelacanths Lungfish Rhizodontids Eusthenopteron Panderichthyes Tiktaalik Ventastega Acanthostega Ichthyostega Tulerpeton Whatcheeria Pederpes More advanced amphibians Reconstructions of the basal tetrapod Ventastega.
    [Show full text]
  • EGT Aastaraamat 2020 ENG.Indd
    YEARBOOK GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ESTONIA F. R. Kreutzwaldi 5 44314 Rakvere Telephone: (+372) 630 2333 E-mail: [email protected] ISSN 2733-3337 © Eesti Geoloogiateenistus 2021 2 Foreword . 3 About GSE . 5 Cooperation . 6 Human resource development . 9 Fieldwork areas 2020 . 12 GEOLOGICAL MAPPING AND GEOLOGICAL DATA Coring – a major milestone in subsurface investigations in Estonia . 13 Coring projects for geological investigations at the GSE in 2020 . 15 Distribution, extraction, and exploitation of construction minerals in Pärnu county . 17 Mineral resources, geophysical anomalies, and Kärdla Crater in Hiiumaa . .22 Geological mapping in Pärnu County . .26 Opening year of the digital Geological Archive . .29 HYDROGEOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY Status of Estonian groundwater bodies in 2014–2019 . 31 Salinisation of groundwater in Ida-Viru County . .35 Groundwater survey of Kukruse waste rock heap . .37 The quality of groundwater and surface water in areas with a high proportion of agricultural land . .39 Transient 3D modelling of 18O concentrations with the MODFLOW-2005 and MT3DMS codes in a regional-scale aquifer system: an example from the Estonian Artesian Basin . .42 Radon research in insuffi ciently studied municipalities: Keila and Võru towns, Rõuge, Setomaa, Võru, and Ruhnu rural municipalities . .46 GroundEco – joint management of groundwater dependent ecosystems in transboundary Gauja–Koiva river basin . .50 MARINE GEOLOGY Coastal monitoring in 2019-2020 . .53 Geophysical surveys of fairways . .56 Environmental status of seabed sediments in the Baltic Sea . .58 The strait of Suur väin between the Estonian mainland and the Muhu Island overlies a complex bedrock valley . 60 Foreword 2020 has been an unusual year that none of us is likely to soon forget.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesis De Grado Valentina Blandon 201511522
    Reconstrucción científica del Macizo Devónico de Floresta, ilustrada en un diorama. Por Valentina Blandón Hurtado 201511522 Director Dr. Leslie F. Noè Uniandes Co director Dr. Jaime Reyes Abril S.G.C. Universidad de los Andes Facultad de Ciencias Departamento de Geociencias Bogotá, Colombia Noviembre 2019 Leslie F. Noè Jaime A. Reyes Valentina Blandón Hurtado II Tabla de contenido Dedicación .................................................................................................................................V Agradecimiento ..........................................................................................................................V Resumen ...................................................................................................................................VI Abstract ...................................................................................................................................VII Introducción ................................................................................................................................1 Metodología y Materiales ...........................................................................................................5 Resultados y Discusiones ...........................................................................................................7 Devónico Inferior – Formación El Tibet ....................................................................................7 Descripción organismos Formación El Tibet .........................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Earliest Phyllolepid (Placodermi, Arthrodira) from the Late Lochkovian (Early Devonian) of Yunnan (South China)
    Geol. Mag. 145 (2), 2008, pp. 257–278. c 2007 Cambridge University Press 257 doi:10.1017/S0016756807004207 First published online 30 November 2007 Printed in the United Kingdom The earliest phyllolepid (Placodermi, Arthrodira) from the Late Lochkovian (Early Devonian) of Yunnan (South China) V. DUPRET∗ &M.ZHU Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 643, Xizhimenwai Dajie 142, Beijing 100044, People’s Republic of China (Received 1 November 2006; accepted 26 June 2007) Abstract – Gavinaspis convergens, a new genus and species of the Phyllolepida (Placodermi: Arthrodira), is described on the basis of skull remains from the Late Lochkovian (Xitun Formation, Early Devonian) of Qujing (Yunnan, South China). This new form displays a mosaic of characters of basal actinolepidoid arthrodires and more derived phyllolepids. A new hypothesis is proposed concerning the origin of the unpaired centronuchal plate of the Phyllolepida by a fusion of the paired central plates into one single dermal element and the loss of the nuchal plate. A phylogenetic analysis suggests the position of Gavinaspis gen. nov. as the sister group of the Phyllolepididae, in a distinct new family (Gavinaspididae fam. nov.). This new form suggests a possible Chinese origin for the Phyllolepida or that the common ancestor to Phyllolepida lived in an area including both South China and Gondwana, and in any case corroborates the palaeogeographic proximity between Australia and South China during the Devonian Period. Keywords: Devonian, China, Placodermi, phyllolepids, biostratigraphy, palaeobiogeography. 1. Introduction 1934). Subsequently, they were considered as either sharing an immediate common ancestor with the The Phyllolepida are a peculiar group of the Arthrodira Arthrodira (Denison, 1978), belonging to the Actin- (Placodermi), widespread in the Givetian–Famennian olepidoidei (Long, 1984), or being of indetermined of Gondwana (Australia, Antarctica, Turkey, South position within the Arthrodira (Goujet & Young,1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamical, Biological, and Anthropic Consequences of Equal Lunar and Solar Angular Radii Rspa.Royalsocietypublishing.Org Steven A
    Dynamical, biological, and anthropic consequences of equal lunar and solar angular radii rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org Steven A. Balbus 1Astrophysics, Keble Road, Denys Wilkinson Building, Research University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH The nearly equal lunar and solar angular sizes Article submitted to journal as subtended at the Earth is generally regarded as a coincidence. This is, however, an incidental consequence of the tidal forces from these bodies Subject Areas: being comparable. Comparable magnitudes implies Astronomy, Astrobiology strong temporal modulation, as the forcing frequencies are nearly but not precisely equal. We suggest that on Keywords: the basis of paleogeographic reconstructions, in the Devonian period, when the first tetrapods appeared Tides, evolution, Moon on land, a large tidal range would accompany these modulated tides. This would have been conducive to Author for correspondence: the formation of a network of isolated tidal pools, Steven Balbus lending support to A.S. Romer’s classic idea that the e-mail: [email protected] evaporation of shallow pools was an evolutionary impetus for the development of chiridian limbs in aquatic tetrapodomorphs. Romer saw this as the reason for the existence of limbs, but strong selection pressure for terrestrial navigation would have been present even if the limbs were aquatic in origin. Since even a modest difference in the Moon’s angular size relative to the Sun’s would lead to a qualitatively different tidal modulation, the fact that we live on a planet with a Sun and Moon of close apparent size is not entirely coincidental: it may have an anthropic basis. arXiv:1406.0323v1 [astro-ph.EP] 2 Jun 2014 c The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society.
    [Show full text]
  • I Ecomorphological Change in Lobe-Finned Fishes (Sarcopterygii
    Ecomorphological change in lobe-finned fishes (Sarcopterygii): disparity and rates by Bryan H. Juarez A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in the University of Michigan 2015 Master’s Thesis Committee: Assistant Professor Lauren C. Sallan, University of Pennsylvania, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Daniel L. Rabosky, Co-Chair Associate Research Scientist Miriam L. Zelditch i © Bryan H. Juarez 2015 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the Rabosky Lab, David W. Bapst, Graeme T. Lloyd and Zerina Johanson for helpful discussions on methodology, Lauren C. Sallan, Miriam L. Zelditch and Daniel L. Rabosky for their dedicated guidance on this study and the London Natural History Museum for courteously providing me with access to specimens. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF APPENDICES v ABSTRACT vi SECTION I. Introduction 1 II. Methods 4 III. Results 9 IV. Discussion 16 V. Conclusion 20 VI. Future Directions 21 APPENDICES 23 REFERENCES 62 iv LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLE/FIGURE II. Cranial PC-reduced data 6 II. Post-cranial PC-reduced data 6 III. PC1 and PC2 Cranial and Post-cranial Morphospaces 11-12 III. Cranial Disparity Through Time 13 III. Post-cranial Disparity Through Time 14 III. Cranial/Post-cranial Disparity Through Time 15 v LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Aquatic and Semi-aquatic Lobe-fins 24 B. Species Used In Analysis 34 C. Cranial and Post-Cranial Landmarks 37 D. PC3 and PC4 Cranial and Post-cranial Morphospaces 38 E. PC1 PC2 Cranial Morphospaces 39 1-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Devonian Daniel Childress Parkland College
    Parkland College A with Honors Projects Honors Program 2019 Did You Know: Devonian Daniel Childress Parkland College Recommended Citation Childress, Daniel, "Did You Know: Devonian" (2019). A with Honors Projects. 252. https://spark.parkland.edu/ah/252 Open access to this Poster is brought to you by Parkland College's institutional repository, SPARK: Scholarship at Parkland. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENUS PHYLUM CLASS ORDER SIZE ENVIROMENT DIET: DIET: DIET: OTHER D&D 5E “PERSONAL NOTES” # CARNIVORE HERBIVORE SIZE ACANTHOSTEGA Chordata Amphibia Ichthyostegalia 58‐62 cm Marine (Neritic) Y ‐ ‐ small 24in amphibian 1 ACICULOPODA Arthropoda Malacostraca Decopoda 6‐8 cm Marine (Neritic) Y ‐ ‐ tiny Giant Prawn 2 ADELOPHTHALMUS Arthropoda Arachnida Eurypterida 4‐32 cm Marine (Neritic) Y ‐ ‐ small “Swimmer” Scorpion 3 AKMONISTION Chordata Chondrichthyes Symmoriida 47‐50 cm Marine (Neritic) Y ‐ ‐ small ratfish 4 ALKENOPTERUS Arthropoda Arachnida Eurypterida 2‐4 cm Marine (Transitional) Y ‐ ‐ small Sea scorpion 5 ANGUSTIDONTUS Arthropoda Malacostraca Angustidontida 6‐9 cm Marine (Pelagic) Y ‐ ‐ small Primitive shrimp 6 ASTEROLEPIS Chordata Placodermi Antiarchi 32‐35 cm Marine (Transitional) Y ‐ Y small Placo bottom feeder 7 ATTERCOPUS Arthropoda Arachnida Uraraneida 1‐2 cm Marine (Transitional) Y ‐ ‐ tiny Proto‐Spider 8 AUSTROPTYCTODUS Chordata Placodermi Ptyctodontida 10‐12 cm Marine (Neritic) Y ‐ ‐ tiny Half‐Plate 9 BOTHRIOLEPIS Chordata Placodermi Antiarchia 28‐32 cm Marine (Neritic) ‐ ‐ Y tiny Jawed Placoderm 10
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Sequence Stratigraphy of the Ordovician of Baltoscandia …………………………………………… 20 Druzhinina, O
    Baltic Stratigraphical Association Department of Geology, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia Natural History Museum of Latvia THE EIGHTH BALTIC STRATIGRAPHICAL CONFERENCE ABSTRACTS Edited by E. Lukševičs, Ģ. Stinkulis and J. Vasiļkova Rīga, 2011 The Eigth Baltic Stratigraphical Conference 28 August – 1 September 2011, Latvia Abstracts Edited by E. Lukševičs, Ģ. Stinkulis and J. Vasiļkova Scientific Committee: Organisers: Prof. Algimantas Grigelis (Vilnius) Baltic Stratigraphical Association Dr. Olle Hints (Tallinn) Department of Geology, University of Latvia Dr. Alexander Ivanov (St. Petersburg) Natural History Museum of Latvia Prof. Leszek Marks (Warsaw) Northern Vidzeme Geopark Prof. Tõnu Meidla (Tartu) Dr. Jonas Satkūnas (Vilnius) Prof. Valdis Segliņš (Riga) Prof. Vitālijs Zelčs (Chairman, Riga) Recommended reference to this publication Ceriņa, A. 2011. Plant macrofossil assemblages from the Eemian-Weichselian deposits of Latvia and problems of their interpretation. In: Lukševičs, E., Stinkulis, Ģ. and Vasiļkova, J. (eds). The Eighth Baltic Stratigraphical Conference. Abstracts. University of Latvia, Riga. P. 18. The Conference has special sessions of IGCP Project No 591 “The Early to Middle Palaeozoic Revolution” and IGCP Project No 596 “Climate change and biodiversity patterns in the Mid-Palaeozoic (Early Devonian to Late Carboniferous)”. See more information at http://igcl591.org. Electronic version can be downloaded at www.geo.lu.lv/8bsc Hard copies can be obtained from: Department of Geology, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia Raiņa Boulevard 19, Riga LV-1586, Latvia E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-9984-45-383-5 Riga, 2011 2 Preface Baltic co-operation in regional stratigraphy is active since the foundation of the Baltic Regional Stratigraphical Commission (BRSC) in 1969 (Grigelis, this volume).
    [Show full text]
  • 1651 Chevrinais.Vp
    Early establishment of vertebrate trophic interactions: Food web structure in Middle to Late Devonian fish assemblages with exceptional fossilization MARION CHEVRINAIS,CLAIRE JACQUET & RICHARD CLOUTIER In past and present ecosystems, trophic interactions determine material and energy transfers among species, regulating population dynamics and community stability. Food web studies in past ecosystems are helpful to assess the persistence of ecosystem structure throughout geological times and to explore the existence of general principles of food web assem- bly. We determined and compared the trophic structure of two Devonian fish assemblages [(1) the Escuminac assem- blage (ca. 380 Ma), Miguasha, eastern Canada and (2) the Lode assemblage (ca. 390 Ma), Straupe, Latvia] with a closer look at the Escuminac assemblage. Both localities are representative of Middle to Late Devonian aquatic vertebrate as- semblages in terms of taxonomic richness (ca. 20 species), phylogenetic diversity (all major groups of lower vertebrates) and palaeoenvironment (palaeoestuaries). Fossil food web structures were assessed using different kinds of direct (i.e. digestive contents and bite marks in fossils) and indirect (e.g. ecomorphological measurements, stratigraphic species co-occurrences) indicators. First, the relationships between predator and prey body size established for the Escuminac fishes are comparable to those of recent aquatic ecosystems, highlighting a consistency of aquatic food web structure across geological time. Second, non-metric dimensional scaling on ecomorphological variables and cluster analysis showed a common pattern of functional groups for both fish assemblages; top predators, predators, primary and second- ary consumers were identified. We conclude that Devonian communities were organized in multiple trophic levels and that size-based feeding interactions were established early in vertebrate history.
    [Show full text]