The Auckland Volcanic Fields
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule
Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule [rcp/dp] Introduction The factors in B4.2.2(4) have been used to determine the features included in Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule, and will be used to assess proposed future additions to the schedule. ID Name Location Site type Description Unitary Plan criteria 2 Algies Beach Algies Bay E This site is one of the a, b, g melange best examples of an exposure of the contact between Northland Allocthon and Miocene Waitemata Group rocks. 3 Ambury Road Mangere F A complex 140m long a, b, c, lava cave Bridge lava cave with two d, g, i branches and many well- preserved flow features. Part of the cave contains unusual lava stalagmites with corresponding stalactites above. 4 Anawhata Waitākere A This locality includes a a, c, e, gorge and combination of g, i, l beach unmodified landforms, produced by the dynamic geomorphic processes of the Waitakere coast. Anawhata Beach is an exposed sandy beach, accumulated between dramatic rocky headlands. Inland from the beach, the Anawhata Stream has incised a deep gorge into the surrounding conglomerate rock. 5 Anawhata Waitākere E A well-exposed, and a, b, g, l intrusion unusual mushroom-shaped andesite intrusion in sea cliffs in a small embayment around rocks at the north side of Anawhata Beach. 6 Arataki Titirangi E The best and most easily a, c, l volcanic accessible exposure in breccia and the eastern Waitākere sandstone Ranges illustrating the interfingering nature of Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 1 Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule the coarse volcanic breccias from the Waitākere Volcano with the volcanic-poor Waitematā Basin sandstone and siltstones. -
Dilemma of Geoconservation of Monogenetic Volcanic Sites Under Fast Urbanization and Infrastructure Developments with Special Re
sustainability Article Dilemma of Geoconservation of Monogenetic Volcanic Sites under Fast Urbanization and Infrastructure Developments with Special Relevance to the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand Károly Németh 1,2,3,* , Ilmars Gravis 3 and Boglárka Németh 1 1 School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand; [email protected] 2 Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, 9400 Sopron, Hungary 3 The Geoconservation Trust Aotearoa, 52 Hukutaia Road, Op¯ otiki¯ 3122, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +64-27-4791484 Abstract: Geoheritage is an important aspect in developing workable strategies for natural hazard resilience. This is reflected in the UNESCO IGCP Project (# 692. Geoheritage for Geohazard Resilience) that continues to successfully develop global awareness of the multifaced aspects of geoheritage research. Geohazards form a great variety of natural phenomena that should be properly identified, and their importance communicated to all levels of society. This is especially the case in urban areas such as Auckland. The largest socio-economic urban center in New Zealand, Auckland faces potential volcanic hazards as it sits on an active Quaternary monogenetic volcanic field. Individual volcanic geosites of young eruptive products are considered to form the foundation of community Citation: Németh, K.; Gravis, I.; outreach demonstrating causes and consequences of volcanism associated volcanism. However, in Németh, B. Dilemma of recent decades, rapid urban development has increased demand for raw materials and encroached Geoconservation of Monogenetic on natural sites which would be ideal for such outreach. The dramatic loss of volcanic geoheritage Volcanic Sites under Fast of Auckland is alarming. -
Auckland Volcanic Field Magmatism, Volcanism, and Hazard: a Review
1 This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in New Zealand 2 Journal of Geology and Geophysics on 18 March 2020, available online: 3 http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00288306.2020.1736102 4 5 6 Auckland Volcanic Field magmatism, volcanism, and hazard: a review 7 8 9 Jenni L Hopkins*1, Elaine R Smid*2, Jennifer D Eccles2, Josh L Hayes3, Bruce W Hayward4, Lucy E McGee5, 10 Kasper van Wijk2, Thomas M Wilson3, Shane J Cronin2, Graham S Leonard6, Jan M Lindsay2, Karoly 11 Németh7, Ian E M Smith2 12 13 *Corresponding Author(s): [email protected] / [email protected] 14 15 1Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand 16 2 University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand 17 3 University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand 18 4 Geomarine Research, 19 Debron Ave, Remuera, Auckland, New Zealand 19 5 University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 20 6 GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand 21 7 Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand 22 23 24 25 26 27 Manuscript prepared for submission to the IAVCEI special issue of New Zealand Journal of Geology and 28 Geophysics 29 30 31 1 32 33 Keywords 34 intraplate, monogenetic volcanism, chronology, tephrochronology, volcanic hazard assessment, faulting, 35 magma ascent rates, geochemistry, eruption scenarios, New Zealand 2 36 Abstract 37 Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF) is a basaltic intraplate volcanic field in North Island, New Zealand, 38 upon which >1.6 million people live. -
Motukorea Browns Island Archaeological Landscape
Motukorea/Browns Island Archaeological Landscape Heritage Assessment Andy Dodd, DOC, Auckland conservvanncy 24 MAY 2006 Motukorea/Browns Island AArchaeeoologicaal Lanndssccape Heritage Assessment Andy Dodd, DOC, Aucklannd Conseervanccy 24 MAY 2006 Peer-reviewed by Sarah Maacreadyy, Aucklland Coonnservvanccy Cover image: Browns Island / Motukorea, Kevin L. Jones, May 2005 Publ.info. © New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN 978-0-478-14303-4 (web PDF) CONTENTS 1. Site Overview 5 2. History description 5 3. Fabric description 6 4. Cultural connections 6 5. National context 7 6. Historic significance 7 7. Fabric significance 8 8. Cultural significance 8 9. Significant themes & site types 8 10. Management recommendations 9 11. Management history 10 12. Work vision statement 10 13. Sources & reports 11 14. Evaluation of sources 13 15. Location & site maps 13 16. Definitive photos 13 Endnotes 14 Map key 15 17. Chronology of events 19 Browns Island / Motukorea, Kevin L. Jones, May 2005 1. SITE OVVERVIIEW Motukorea / Browns Island has a long history of Polynesian occupation, with Ngati Tama Te Ra as iwi. For at least six centuries the island was a base for Maori gardening and fishing. Subsequent activity includes farming from 1840 and a destination for picnic excursions, both continuing to the present day The archaeological landscape of the island is outstanding because of its completeness and intactness. The island has a wide range of site types including some that are rare in the Auckland region: archaic middens, fish traps and stone structures. Archaeological sites play a key role in preserving a record of the past, comparable in value to museums and archives. -
Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard
Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay1 and Graham Leonard2 1School of Environment & Institute of Earth Science and Engineering, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; [email protected] 2GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040 New Zealand; [email protected] IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 This report was prepared by IESE as part of the DEVORA Project. Disclaimer: While the information contained in this report is believed to be correct at the time of publication, the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and its working parties and agents involved in preparation and publication, do not accept any liability for its contents or for any consequences arising from its use. Copyright: This work is copyright of the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering. The content may be used with acknowledgement to the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and the appropriate citation. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project objectives ..................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ -
Technical Report 7: Landscape Assessment
Technical Report 7: Landscape Assessment Document History and Status Revision Date Reviewed by Status 21.02.2019 R Pryor Draft 27.02.019 For Issue File Number/Name 18740 LVA01 Author J Hogan Client Euroclass Services Ltd 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 LA4 Landscape Architects have been engaged by Euroclass Services Ltd to undertake a landscape assessment of Outstanding Natural Feature 93 (ONF 93) to inform a Private Plan Change request to the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) (AUPOP). As part of the plan change, Euroclass Services Ltd seeks to: § rezone the existing quarry zoning associated with the Stonehill Business Park under the AUPOP to Business - Heavy Industry § remove the ONF classification from the southern part of the plan change area that generally corresponds to the site at 79 McLaughlins Road (refer to Figure 1), as this is considered to be erroneous. Figure 1. The Site and Plan Change Area In Relation to ONF93 Source: Babbage 1.2 The scope of this assessment includes: § a description of the site and setting § a review of the landscape assessment of ONF 93 undertaken as part of Landscape Evaluations of Geological Sites and Landforms of Auckland and the Identification of Outstanding Natural Features, which was prepared in 2012 and used to inform AUPOP § an assessment of the landscape values of the portion of the PC area currently located within ONF 93 27.02.2019 2 LA4 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS § conclusions as to the applicability of the ONF classifications locally and in particular to the site at 79 McLaughlins Road. 1.3 I am very familiar with the site and surrounds having previously prepared a landscape and visual assessment as part of the consenting stage for the nearby Auckland South Corrections Facility, as well as being the lead landscape architect involved in the landscape design and supervision of landscape works associated with the prison. -
Constructing a Temporal Eruption Record for the Auckland Volcanic Field Via Bayesian Age Reconciliation
Constructing a temporal eruption record for the Auckland Volcanic Field via Bayesian age reconciliation Emily Kawabata, Mark Bebbington, Shane Cronin, Ting Wang Massey University, University of Auckland, University of Otago The Auckland Volcanic Field High population density, lifelines narrowly constrained - WHERE is the next eruption likely to be? 2 Spatio-temporal hazard estimates Monogenetic volcanic fields have multiple volcanoes; a new eruption is expected to create a new volcano. Events are infrequent. For land-use and emergency planning purposes: where is the next eruption likely to be? In short time frame, answered(?) by monitoring data (seismicity, gas, ...) What about in a period of repose? Probability forecast: estimate the hazard λ(x) such that the probability of an event in the neighbourhood of x , (i.e., y:||y-x|| < ∆x) ~ λ(x) π (∆x)2 We know the spatial locations of Look for spatial patterns (events are more (most) vents likely to occur `near’ previous events?) BUT! Want PRESENT DAY hazard Does the pattern change over time? 3 The Auckland Volcanic Field 51(?) small basaltic volcanoes young (~250,000 years) Most recent eruption ~600 years ago Data: • Stratigraphy, ~33 vents constrained in at least one direction • Age determinations • Paleomagnetism ~5+ vents • C14, ~13 vents • Tephrostratigraphy, 22+ tephra in 5 locations • Ar-Ar, ~4 vents • Thermoluminesence, 2 vents • K-Ar, unreliable due to excess Ar reliability Decreasing • Relative geomorphology or weathering Also: known vent locations, reasonable volume data (Allen and Smith 1994; Kereszturi et al. 2013) 4 A Monte Carlo sample of age-orderings Name Mean Age (ka) Age Error (ka) Min Order Max Order By reverse engineering the tephra Onepoto Basin 248.4 27.8 1 7 Albert Park 229.8 39.5 1 7 dispersal, Bebbington and Cronin ..... -
The NRD Site Community Report
The NRD site Community report Matt hew Campbell and Beatrice Hudson Th e NRD site Community report Matt hew Campbell and Beatrice Hudson © CFG Heritage Ltd. 2011 CFG Heritage Ltd. P.O. Box 10 015 Dominion Road Auckland 1024 ph. (09) 309 2426 [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Landscape, vegetation and climate 3 3 Traditional history 5 4 Th e archaeology of the Manukau 9 5 Archaeology 14 6 Dates 39 7 Environment 41 8 Taonga 42 9 Flaked stone 59 10 Mammal bone 63 11 Bird bone 66 12 Fish bone 68 13 Shell 72 14 Excavating and recording the koiwi 73 15 Th e burial population 78 16 How were they buried? 82 17 Disease and injury 95 18 Summary and discussion 107 19 Conclusion: memory and identity 114 Glossary 117 References 118 Appendix: Individual descriptions 123 i ii Th e Northern Runway Development excavations have been fully reported in two technical reports, one dealing with the archaeology, the other with the koiwi. Th is community report summarises the technical reports, and is written in non-technical language. It is designed to be accessible to the interested lay person, including tangata whenua of Pukaki and Makaurau Marae, whose ancestors lived and were buried at the site and for whom this report is pri- marily written. Th e authors of the various chapters of the technical reports are Matthew Campbell, Arden Cruickshank, Louise Furey, Jaden Harris, Stuart Hawkins and Beatrice Hudson, with additional work by Mark Horrocks and Rod Wallace. Th is community report has been prepared by Matthew Campbell (site director) and Beatrice Hudson (osteologist). -
The Role of Substrate Hydrogeology and Surface Hydrology in the Construction of Phreatomagmatic Volcanoes on an Active Monogenetic Field (Auckland, New Zealand)
Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. The role of substrate hydrogeology and surface hydrology in the construction of phreatomagmatic volcanoes on an active monogenetic field (Auckland, New Zealand) A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Earth Science At Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand Javier Agustín Flores 2015 2 Abstract Phreatomagmatic activity is pervasive in the Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF) with more than two thirds of the erupted volcanoes showing this type of activity at different degrees, dominantly at the onset of their eruptive histories. In general, the volcanoes built in the northern AVF rest on Late Miocene Waitemata Group rocks (turbiditic siltstone and sandstone succession), whereas in the southern AVF the Waitemata rocks are overlain by tens of metres of Plio-Pleistocene, water-saturated sediments (Tauranga Group and Kaawa Formation). Identifying the control exerted by the type of substrate in the eruption dynamics of the phreatomagmatic phases of three volcanoes in the AVF is the objective of this study. The stratigraphic, sedimentary, and pyroclast characteristics of the phreatomagmatic sequences of Maungataketake, Motukorea, and North Head volcanoes, together with supplementary information on the geology and hydrogeology of the area, were investigated to solve the problem. Three phreatomagmatic eruptive scenarios were outlined. Scenario 1 (Maungataketake eruption) and Scenario 2 (Motukorea eruption) depict the formation of maar-diatreme volcanoes in the southern and northern AVF, respectively. -
North Head: the Development of a Fort
SCIENCE AND RESEARCH INTERNAL REPORT NO. 79 NORTH HEAD: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FORT by D G Veart This is an internal Department of Conservation report and must be cited as Science and Research Internal Report No. 79. Permission for use of any of its contents must be obtained from the Director (Science & Research), Central Office, Department of Conservation. Historic Investigation Team, Auckland Conservancy, for Science and Research Division P.O. Box 10-420 Wellington, New Zealand August 1990 ISSN 0114-2798 ISBN 0-478-0121 1-X ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was funded by the Department of Conservation. Thanks are owed to the following people who shared their knowledge: J. Earnshaw, J Mitchell, R M Nutsford, J de J Oswald, W Spring-Rice The use of their information is of course my responsibility alone. CONTENTS ABSTRACT 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Geographical Background 1 2.0 HISTORY OF OCCUPATION 4 2.1 Pre-European Settlement 4 2.2 The Post Contact Period 1820-1885 7 2.3 European Fortification Prior to 1885 9 2.4 European Fortification since 1885 9 1885 - 1904 9 1904 - 1920s 10 1920s -1939 10 1939 - 1945 10 1945 to present day 10 3.0 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 10 3.1 1885 -1904 10 3.2 1904-1945 11 3.3 1945 onwards 12 4.0 THE GUN BATTERIES AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES 12 4.1 Fort Cautley or the Summit Battery 12 4.1.1 Cautley Battery 1904 -1945 18 4.1.2 Fort Cautley Today 18 4.2 North Battery, or Cheltenham Beach Battery 21 4.2.1 North Battery Today 24 4.3 South Battery 1885 -1904 24 4.3.1 South Battery Today 26 4.4 The 12-Pounder Battery 26 4.4.1 The -
Maori Gardening: an Archaeological Perspective
Maori gardening An archaeological perspective Louise Furey Published by Science & Technical Publishing Department of Conservation PO Box 10–420 Wellington, New Zealand Cover: Pa, stone row enclosures and puke (garden mounds) at Waikekeno, Wairarapa. Photo: Kevin L. Jones, DOC. © Copyright October 2006, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN 0–478–14122–X This report was prepared for publication by Science & Technical Publishing; editing by Lynette Clelland and Amanda Todd, and layout by Amanda Todd. Publication was approved by the Chief Scientist (Research, Development & Improvement Division), Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. When printing, recycled paper is used wherever possible. CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Maori cultigens 10 2.1 Kumara 10 2.2 Taro 13 2.3 Yam 14 2.4 Gourd 14 2.5 Ti pore 15 2.6 Aute 16 3. Gardening techniques 17 3.1 Garden location 17 3.2 Garden size 17 3.3 Fallowing 18 3.4 Garden preparation 18 3.5 Soil additives 19 4. Limitations to growth of Maori cultigens 20 5. Archaeological evidence of Maori gardening 23 5.1 Stone structures 24 5.1.1 Stone walls and rows 24 5.1.2 Stone alignments 31 5.1.3 Stone heaps 31 5.1.4 Stone mounds 31 5.1.5 Stone facing 34 5.2 Ditches and trenches 34 5.2.1 Steep-slope trenches 36 5.2.2 Trenches on gentle slopes 38 5.2.3 Trench boundary divisions 39 5.2.4 Wetland ditches 40 5.3 Borrow pits 44 5.4 Garden soils 46 5.5 Garden terraces 52 6. -
Estimated Restoration Times Over Next 24 Hours
Northcote Point Bayswater L a Vauxhall k e ´ R o y a a d w Stanley Point r Stanley Bay Cheltenham o t o M Devonport n r e h t Browns Island (Motukorea) r o N et tre S r W e e s m t a h H av en Dr ive t e t e B e r t e e a r S t c Freemans Bay t S r h Mechanics Bay e CBD u e n R n b o l t o B e K s v A e a a b e t u d A r h o p H t n Mission Bay S e H e i Ponsonby o S P t c T k r S w e a a t o n m ve r i t Kohimarama e e a r A n e r ki D r Saint Heliers t e e e e s S Orakei T e u o u 6 t n t n r 1 e e e Q Parnell l T b il a v e h u y v ta A R t S n r et e o a i re r a l N S Towai S t a d ay G t oad rw d g R d oto a re tt il Glendowie M a e A tern io S t n Cres ro K r es o treet dde c p ik -w o en K i rth R G t S d o d ad o a S N Grafton llA Ro h t Arch Hill y a Kepa i o re e r o m R e rn S R a y t Newton a tre i r a B e Sho e a P t re k m B o t a s R r a r n e oa ie d d e d O R l a Newmarket r t e o Eden Terrace t e o R S d e H e S u a t c t a e n r r n d S ra a o t e e e u p e R S v d s p E t l r l A a a Meadowbank e e o A e De H c ll Avenue R p B W o n i e d r e h a n a a a n p r o i e a t Jo a S Wai o Taiki Bay M R t hns d c a S R e d a i o A u r u a h u v L n u o V Remuera a e a t e p R R l n l e e d R Glen Innes y v e a e Saint Johns u a m n o e r R g i A v t i o e P a ro o u v r s e N l pe a s S R d D ct r e T d e t a i a erra e i c K l o R u p l oa a M i g S d n il r n ton Mount Eden a G Ro a o a ad R u P M t t e h s e v Point England D a iv i D is Halifa e r r ex ra x Avenue r E D y ter el n e D i a Ave St an e n r n d e ue et