DOCSLIB.ORG

Sari M. Van Anders, Ph.D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sari M. Van Anders, Ph.D van Anders Vita 1 Sari M. van Anders, Ph.D. Departments of Psychology and Gender Studies, Queen’s University 61 Arch Street, Kingston ON K7L 3N6, Canada E-Mail: [email protected] Phone: 613-533-2037 Website: https://www.queensu.ca/psychology/van-anders-lab/ RESEARCH INTERESTS Social neuroendocrinology, intimacy & sexuality, gender/sex & sexual diversity, feminist neuroscience, evolution, health, feminist science studies, queer science. APPOINTMENTS Canada 150 Research Chair in Social Neuroendocrinology, Sexuality, & Gender/Sex (July 2018-present); Queen’s University, July 2018-present: Professor, Departments of Psychology and Gender Studies (July 2018-present); Affiliate Faculty, Center for Neuroscience Studies (July 2018-present). University of Michigan (UM), 2008-2018: Thurnau Professorship for Outstanding Contributions to Undergraduate Education (2018; declined to move to new position); Early Promotion to Full Professor, Departments of Psychology and Women’s Studies (2018; declined to move to new position); Associate Professor, Departments of Psychology and Women’s Studies (2014-May 2018); Assistant Professor, Departments of Psychology and Women’s Studies (2008-2014); Faculty Member, Program in Neuroscience (2008-present); Faculty Member, Reproductive Science Program (2009-present); Faculty Member, Science, Technology, & Society Program (2012-present); Faculty Member, Biosocial Methods Collaborative (2013-present). (Modified Duties/Parental Leave: winter 2010; fall 2015/winter 2016). Indiana University Bloomington (IUB), 2007 – 2008: Assistant Professor, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences; Assistant Research Scientist, The Kinsey Institute; Affiliate, Gender Studies, Neuroscience, Center for Integrative Studies in Animal Behavior. EDUCATION ∙Ph.D., Biological & Cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University (SFU), 2003 – 2007. ∙M.A., Behavioural & Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario (UWO), 2001-2003. ∙Hons. B.A. with Distinction, Scholars’ Electives & Psychology, UWO, 1997-2001. van Anders Vita 2 GRANTS ∙2018-2025: Government of Canada, 2018-2025. Canada 150 Research Chair in Social Neuroendocrinology, Sexuality, & Gender/Sex; $2,450,000 ($350,000/year x 7 years). 2019-2021: Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) (38461). Role: PI. Social Neuroendocrinology Lab $250,000. ∙2016-2018 (to 2021, but left early to move to Canada): National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Child Health & Development (NICHD) (2T32HD007109-36). (Multiple PIs: Monk and McLoyd) Role: Co-I. Developmental Psychology Training Grant. $2,119,025. ∙2011-2018: National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (1R01AI094563). Role: PI. Sexual modulation of HIV-relevant vaginal immunity. $1,837,368; direct: $1,175,000. ∙2012-2017: Institute for Research on Women and Gender (IRWG) Program Grant, UM. Role: PI. Feminism + Science = Feminist Science Studies. ~$10,000/yr. ∙2014-2016: University of Michigan Injury Prevention Center. Role: PI. Child maltreatment: A new interdisciplinary model for identifying hormonal and contextual mediators and assessing interventions. $25,000. ∙2013-2016: (ranked first of 46 applications) Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Gender & Health, Institutes of Neurosciences, Mental Health & Addiction. Role: Co-Investigator. Sexual desire emerges from arousal: testing a model of responsive desire in women with and without sexual difficulties. 130347 $187,374. ∙2014-2015: Institute for Research on Women and Gender Collaborative Planning Grant, UM. Role: co-I. The Embodiment of Insult: Gender and Biobehavioral Responses to Incivility in Organizations. $8,000. ∙2012-2014: ADVANCE Development of Online Professional Networks for Faculty, UM. Role: PI. Feminist Science Network. $4,920. ∙2011-2012: Office of the Vice President for Research, UM. Role: Co-PI. Influences of cuddling and attachment on neuroendocrine & psychological outcomes. $25,000. ∙2009-2012: American Institute of Bisexuality, Inc. Role: PI. Multigender partnering and polyamory: Dynamic implications for bisexuality and hormones. $34,679. van Anders Vita 3 ∙2007-2008: The Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Student Research Grant. Role: PI. Androgenic and sexual responses to visually erotic stimuli in healthy women. $1,000. ∙2005: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Research Tools and Instruments Grant, Role: writing grant application. Enzyme immunoassay lab. $38,200. ∙2004: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada & Simon Fraser University Institutional Grant – Small. Role: writing grant application. Reciprocal effects of sexual encounters and psychological states. $4,000. ∙2003: UWO Teaching Assistants’ Union & Society for Graduate Students Role: PI. Gender, academia, and the professoriate. $150. AWARDS, HONORS, AND FELLOWSHIPS ∙Government of Canada, 2018-2025. Canada 150 Research Chair in Social Neuroendocrinology, Sexuality, & Gender/Sex; ∙American Psychological Association, Division 1: Society for General Psychology, 2019. George A. Miller Award for an Outstanding Recent Article on General Psychology for Hyde JS, Bigler RB, Joel DS, Tate CC, & van Anders SM, 2019. The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist, 74, 171-193. ∙Wenner-Gren, 2018-2019 (declined). Invited participant at “Toward an Anthropological Understanding of Masculinities, Maleness, and Vioelnce. Sintra, Portugal. ∙American Psychological Association (APA), 2018. One of 24 psychologists invited to be part of APA’s #ThankAScientist campaign. ∙University of Michigan, 2018 (declined to move to new position). Thurnau Professorship for Outstanding Contributions to Undergraduate Education. ∙University of Michigan, 2018 (declined to move to new position). Early promotion to Full Professor. •International Academy of Sex Research, 2018. Best Poster Award. ∙Globe and Mail, 2017 Noted as one of the “big brains behind Canada’s good sex”. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/relationships/the-big-brains-behind-canadas-goodsex/article37056097/ ∙American Psychological Association, 2017. Fellow. ∙Society for the Psychology of Women, 2017. Initial Fellow. ∙University of Michigan Golden Apple Award Committee, 2017. Student-nominated. •International Academy of Sex Research, 2017. Best Brief Communication Award. van Anders Vita 4 ∙Association for Women in Psychology (AWP), 2016. Distinguished Publication Award for van Anders SM, 2015. Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities in Sexual Configurations Theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1177-1213. ∙American Psychological Association (APA), Committee on Women in Psychology, 2016. Committee on Women in Psychology Leadership Award. ∙University of Michigan Golden Apple Award Committee, 2015. Student-nominated for “Sexuality & Science” course. ∙Society for Behavioral Neuroendocrinology (SBN), 2014. Frank A. Beach Young Investigator Award in Behavioral Neuroendocrinology. ∙The Scientist, 2014. Scientist to Watch. ∙University of Michigan: Literature, Science, and the Arts Executive Committee, 2014. 2014 Class of 1923 Memorial Teaching Award for Outstanding Teaching of Undergraduates. •International Academy of Sex Research, 2014. Best Brief Communication Award. ∙Association for Psychological Science (APS), 2013. Janet Taylor Spence Award for Transformative Early Career Contributions. ∙Association for Psychological Science (APS), 2013. APS Fellow. ∙Foundation for the Scientific Study of Sexuality (FSSS), 2012. Ira and Harriet Reiss Theory Award for van Anders SM, Goldey KL, & Kuo PX, 2011. The Steroid/Peptide Theory of Social Bonds: Integrating testosterone and peptide responses for classifying social behavioral contexts. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36, 1265-1275. ∙Canadian Institute of Health Research, Institute for Gender & Sex Summer Institute, 2011. Invited Mentor. Earlier Awards: Post-Doctoral, Graduate, & Undergraduate ∙Natural Sciences & Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), 2007-2009. Post-Doctoral Fellowship (PDF) Award. $80,000 (declined). ∙Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, 2007-2010. Post-Doctoral Trainee Award. $122,000 (declined). ∙Society for Behavioral Neuroendocrinology, 2007. Young Investigator Award. $1200. ∙Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), 2007. SFU natural science nominee for National Doctoral Prize. ∙Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, & Cognition, 2007. Donald O. Hebb Graduate Student Award Honourable Mention (Oral Presentation). ∙Society for Behavioral Neuroendocrinology, 2006. Travel Award. $800. ∙IODE War Memorial Scholarship, 2005-2006. $15,000. ∙Simon Fraser University, 2004, 2006. Graduate Fellowship, $6,000/yr. ∙Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC) & SFU, 2004, 2005. Travel Award, $700/yr. van Anders Vita 5 ∙M.D. Angus & Associates Graduate Fellowship in Psychology, SFU, 2004. $569. ∙ Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC), 2003-2005. Post-Graduate Study Award (PGS-B), $40,700. ∙ Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC), 2001-2003. Post-Graduate Study Award (PGS-A), $34,600. ∙C.D. Nelson Scholarship, SFU, 2003-2004. $18,000. ∙Special Graduate Entrance Scholarship, SFU, 2003-2004. $7000. ∙Ontario Graduate Scholarship, 2001, 2003. $15,000/yr. ∙For Women in Science, NSERC-UNESCO-L’Oreal Supplement, 2003. $5000. ∙ Council of Canadian
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissenation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and contim1jng from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back ofthe book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge, Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. MI48106-1346 USA 313!761-47oo 800:521-0600 ELISION AND SPECIFICITY WRITTEN AS THE BODY: SEX, GENDER, RACE, ETHNICITY IN FEMINIST THEORY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE DECEMBER 1995 By Carolyn DiPalma Dissertation Committee: Kathy Ferguson, Chairperson Michael Shapiro Phyllis Turnbull Deane Neubauer Ruth Dawson UMI Number: 9615516 UMI Microform 9615516 Copyright 1996, by UMI Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Mirrorshade Women: Feminism and Cyberpunk
    Mirrorshade Women: Feminism and Cyberpunk at the Turn of the Twenty-first Century Carlen Lavigne McGill University, Montréal Department of Art History and Communication Studies February 2008 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Communication Studies © Carlen Lavigne 2008 2 Abstract This study analyzes works of cyberpunk literature written between 1981 and 2005, and positions women’s cyberpunk as part of a larger cultural discussion of feminist issues. It traces the origins of the genre, reviews critical reactions, and subsequently outlines the ways in which women’s cyberpunk altered genre conventions in order to advance specifically feminist points of view. Novels are examined within their historical contexts; their content is compared to broader trends and controversies within contemporary feminism, and their themes are revealed to be visible reflections of feminist discourse at the end of the twentieth century. The study will ultimately make a case for the treatment of feminist cyberpunk as a unique vehicle for the examination of contemporary women’s issues, and for the analysis of feminist science fiction as a complex source of political ideas. Cette étude fait l’analyse d’ouvrages de littérature cyberpunk écrits entre 1981 et 2005, et situe la littérature féminine cyberpunk dans le contexte d’une discussion culturelle plus vaste des questions féministes. Elle établit les origines du genre, analyse les réactions culturelles et, par la suite, donne un aperçu des différentes manières dont la littérature féminine cyberpunk a transformé les usages du genre afin de promouvoir en particulier le point de vue féministe.
    [Show full text]
  • 9780295744117.Pdf (3.082Mb)
    Feminist Technosciences Rebecca Herzig and Banu Subramaniam, Series Editors 1r.Roy, Molecular Feminisms.indd 1 1/28/19 1:10 PM 1r.Roy, Molecular Feminisms.indd 2 1/28/19 1:10 PM Molecular Feminisms BIOLOGY, BECOMINGS, AND LIFE IN THE LAB DEBOLEENA ROY University of Washington Press Seattle 1r.Roy, Molecular Feminisms.indd 3 1/28/19 1:10 PM Publication of this open monograph was the result of Emory University’s participa- tion in TOME (Toward an Open Monograph Ecosystem), a collaboration of the Association of American Universities, the Association of University Presses, and the Association of Research Libraries. TOME aims to expand the reach of long-form humanities and social science scholarship including digital scholarship. Additionally, the program looks to ensure the sustainability of university press monograph pub- lishing by supporting the highest quality scholarship and promoting a new ecology of scholarly publishing in which authors’ institutions bear the publication costs. Funding from Emory University and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation made it possible to open this publication to the world. www.openmonographs.org Copyright © 2018 by Deboleena Roy Printed and bound in the United States of America Interior design by Thomas Eykemans Composed in Chaparral, typeface designed by Carol Twombly Cover design by Katrina Noble Cover photograph by Kheyal Roy-Meighoo and Koan Roy-Meighoo 22 21 20 19 5 4 3 2 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminism Without Grown-Ups: Anti- Racism and the “Matter” of Childhood
    Feminism without Grown-Ups: Anti- Racism and the “Matter” of Childhood A Division III by Quin Rich Committee: Dr. Susana Loza and Dr. Kristen Luschen Spring 2016 Acknowledgements I am greatly indebted to the wonderful faculty members with whom I have been fortunate enough to work in writing Feminism without Grown-Ups. I would like to thank my committee members for their indispensible support, guidance, and feedback throughout this process: Dr. Susana Loza, Dr. Kristen Luschen, and Dr. Natalie Sowell. I have known each of them since my second semester at Hampshire, and I would not be the scholar I am today without their mentorship. I would also like to thank Dr. Angela Willey for many fruitful intellectual conversations, as well as for supporting me as I pursue my feminist academic ambitions. This project would not have been possible without their support and encouragement during this difficult yet rewarding year. Thank you to my mom, Jennifer Rich, for supporting and inspiring me as I continue on my intellectual journey. I am deeply grateful to have you in my life. Rich 1 Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………...... 3 Chapter 1: Epistemic Irreconcilability...……………………………………………....... 8 Chapter 2: Ethical (In)competence and Epistemic Limitation……………………….. 29 Chapter 3: Feminism without Grown-Ups and the Problem of Maturity…………… 58 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………... 74 Works Cited…………………………………………………………………………….... 76 Appendix A: Email from Erika Christakis……………………………………………… 81 Rich 2 Introduction Much feminist thinking deploys the concept of maturity, yet this term is far from unproblematic. Perhaps I should give an example. In response to a question about the larger political significance of her work, feminist philosopher Rosi Braidotti states that feminists can offer “the ordinary citizen” of Europe help in “addressing internal obstacles,” such as heterosexism and racial prejudice (Pető, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.WHY GENDER? TOWARDS an INTEGRATED MODEL of SEXUAL DIFFERENTIATION in HUMAN BEINGS
    Revsita de Filosofía Open Insight ISSN: 2007-2406 [email protected] Centro de Investigación Social Avanzada México Cealey Harrison, Wendy WHY GENDER? TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED MODEL OF SEXUAL DIFFERENTIATION IN HUMAN BEINGS Revsita de Filosofía Open Insight, vol. III, núm. 4, julio, 2012, pp. 59-91 Centro de Investigación Social Avanzada Querétaro, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=421639452004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative WHY GENDER? TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED MODEL OF SEXUAL DIFFERENTIATION IN HUMAN BEINGS Wendy Cealey Harrison University of Greenwich [email protected] Abstract Behind all research into Gender lies a persistent question about why it is that the social construction of sexual differ- entiation amongst human beings seems to entail an almost universal inequality and subordination. Arguably, however, that question, ‘Why?’, is misconceived. This paper argues that we should not be searching for a general answer for the existence of something that is not a single entity or set of processes, whether we are talking about ‘gender’, or ‘sex’. What we need instead is to replace that dichotomy with a model that integrates these two areas of investigation. Keywords: Contingency, Gender, Knowledge, Plasticiy, Sex. 3FDJCJEPr"DFQUBEP 0QFO*OTJHIUt7PMVNFO***t/ KVMJP tQQot*44/ 59 EL GÉNERO: ¿POR QUÉ? HACIA UN MODELO INTEGRADO DE LA DIFERENCIACIÓN SEXUAL EN LOS SERES HUMANOS Resumen Detrás de toda investigación sobre género hay una pregunta persistente: ¿por qué la construcción social de la diferencia- ción sexual en los seres humanos parece producir una au- sencia de igualdad y una subordinación prácticamente uni- versal? Se puede decir, todavía, que la pregunta “¿Por qué?” es una idea mal planteada.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: Theoretical Perspectives on Gender
    CHAPTER Theoretical Perspectives on Gender 2 OUTLINE d. Feminist Critique of Sociobiology and Evolutionary Psychology 1. Psychoanalytic Theory e. Feminist Evolutionary a. Freud’s Theory of Psychosexual Psychology and Feminist Development Sociobiology b. Criticisms of Freud’s 6. Social Role Theory Psychoanalytic Theory 7. Feminist Theories c. Karen Horney a. Gender as Status and Power d. Helene Deutsch b. Intersectionality e. Nancy Chodorow c. Queer Theory 2. Social Learning Theory d. Gender Roles and Socializationdistribute a. Evidence for Social Learning e. External Versus Internal Theory Attributions of Problems b. Cognitive Social Learning Theory f. Consciousnessor Raising 3. Cognitive-Developmental Theory g. Diversity of Feminisms FOCUS 2.1: Feminist Reformulation of h. Summary a Theory of Moral Development i. Evaluation of Feminist Theories 4. Gender Schema Theory j. In Conclusion a. Evidence for Gender Schema Theory post,FOCUS 2.2: Feminist Theory in Psychology: Objectification Theory 5. Sociobiology and Evolutionary Psychology EXPERIENCE THE RESEARCH: a. Parental Investment Gender Schema Theory b. Sexual Selection 8. Chapter Summary c. Evolutionary Psychologycopy, 9. Suggestions for Further Reading nderstanding gender differences has fascinated people probably since the dawn of Uthe human species. In the past century, science has come to dominate intellectual thought. Thus,not it is not surprising that scientific understandings of gender differences have developed. In this chapter we will examine some major psychological theories that have been formulated to explain the differences between women and men and how they develop. DoAt the outset, we think it is important to highlight the distinction between theory and empirical evidence. In the pages that follow, we will describe many of the theories about the psychology of women and gender that have been proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • ©Psychology's Feminist Voices, 2016
    1 Psychology’s Feminist Voices Oral History Project Interview with Gillian Einstein 2016 Interviewed by Jenna MacKay and Lisa Feingold Toronto, ON February 26, 2016 Voices, When citing this interview,Feminist please use the following citation: Einstein, G. (2016, February 26). Interview by J. MacKay & L. Feingold [Video Recording]. Psychology’s Feminist Voices Oral History and Online Archive Project. Toronto, ON. For permission to use this interview in published work, please contact: ©Psychology’s Alexandra Rutherford, PhD Project Director, Psychology’s Feminist Voices [email protected] ©Psychology’s Feminist Voices, 2016 2 Psychology’s Feminist Voices Oral History Project Interview with Gillian Einstein Interviewed by Jenna MacKay and Lisa Feingold Toronto, ON February 26, 2016 JM: Jenna MacKay, Interviewer LF: Lisa Feingold, Interviewer GE: Gillian Einstein, Interview participant --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2016 JM: So Lisa and I are going to take turns asking questions. I guess I’ll let Lisa get started, unless, do you have any questions for us before we begin? GE: No, I just think this is a great project. LF: We always start off our interviews by asking for the historicalVoices, record if you could please state your name and the date and place of your birth. GE: My name is Gillian Einstein. The date of my birth is June 13th, 1952, and I was born in New York City, New York, United States. LF: Great. So we also like to start out by askingFeminist about when you developed a feminist identity, or how did that emerge? GE: I honestly think I was born this way (laughs). I think the first moment of understanding it was actually, I think I was probably seven years old and there was a film series in this little town that I lived in on Saturdays for kids about great people and they had one on Marie Curie.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradigms of Sex Research and Women in STEM
    Paradigms of Sex Research and Women in STEM Jeffrey W. Lockhart University of Michigan Department of Sociology and Center for the Study of Complex Systems [email protected] 24. May 2021 Preprint – Accepted Manuscript Suggested citation: Lockhart, Jeffrey W. 2021. “Paradigms of Sex Research and Women in STEM.” Gender & Society 35(3): 449-475. SocArXiv preprint: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/zajyg Supplemental materials and data: https://osf.io/4jmuw Publisher’s version: https://journals.sagepub.com/eprint/JMFNA939HPATJVF37SRI/full Lockhart | 2 ABSTRACT Scientists’ identities and social locations influence their work, but the content of scientific work can also influence scientists. Theory from feminist science studies, autoethnographic accounts, interviews, and experiments indicate that the substance of scientific research can have profound effects on how scientists are treated by colleagues and their sense of belonging in science. I bring together this disparate literature under the framework of professional cultures and show population-level trends supporting it. Drawing on the Survey of Earned Doctorates and the Web of Science, I use computational social science tools to argue that the way scientists write about sex in their research influences the future gender ratio of PhDs awarded across 53 subfields of the life sciences over a span of 47 years. Specifically, I show that a critical paradigm of “feminist biology” that seeks to de-essentialize sex and gender corresponds to increases in women’s graduation rates, while “sex difference” research—sometimes called “neurosexism” because of its emphasis on essential, categorical differences—has negative effects on women’s graduation rates in most fields. Paradigms of Sex Research and Women in STEM | 3 In 2005 Harvard University’s president, Lawrence Summers, sparked heated debates over the causes of women’s under-representation in many STEM fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Interdisciplinarity Across The
    Rethinking Interdisciplinarity across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences Des Fitzgerald; Felicity Callard ISBN: 9781137407962 DOI: 10.1057/9781137407962 Palgrave Macmillan Please respect intellectual property rights This material is available open access under the Creative Commons license specified. Rethinking Interdisciplinarity across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences Downloaded from www.palgraveconnect.com - licensed to npg - PalgraveConnect - 2015-10-20 - licensed to npg PalgraveConnect www.palgraveconnect.com from Downloaded DOI: 10.1057/9781137407962.0001 10.1057/9781137407962 - Rethinking Interdisciplinarity across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences, Felicity Callard and Des Fitzgerald Other Palgrave Pivot titles Jefferson Walker: King Returns to Washington: Explorations of Memory, Rhetoric, and Politics in the Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial Giovanni Barone Adesi and Nicola Carcano: Modern Multi-Factor Analysis of Bond Portfolios: Critical Implications for Hedging and Investing Rilka Dragneva and Kataryna Wolczuk: Ukraine between the EU and Russia: The Integration Challenge Viola Fabbrini, Massimo Guidolin and Manuela Pedio: Transmission Channels of Financial Shocks to Stock, Bond, and Asset-Backed Markets:An Empirical Model Timothy Wood: Detainee Abuse During Op TELIC: ‘A Few Rotten Apples’? Lars Klüver, Rasmus Øjvind Nielsen and Marie Louise Jørgensen (editors): Policy-Oriented Technology Assessment Across Europe: Expanding Capacities Rebecca E. Lyons and Samantha J. Rayner (editors): The Academic Book of the Future Ben Clements: Surveying Christian Beliefs and Religious Debates in Post-War Britain Robert A. Stebbins: Leisure and the Motive to Volunteer: Theories of Serious, Casual, and Project-Based Leisure Dietrich Orlow: Socialist Reformers and the Collapse of the German Democratic Republic Gwendolyn Audrey Foster: Disruptive Feminisms: Raced, Gendered, and Classed Bodies in Film Catherine A.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Text
    www.ssoar.info Deflationary Logic Tuin, Iris van der Postprint / Postprint Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: www.peerproject.eu Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Tuin, I. v. d. (2008). Deflationary Logic. European Journal of Women's Studies, 15(4), 411-416. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1350506808095297 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter dem "PEER Licence Agreement zur This document is made available under the "PEER Licence Verfügung" gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zum PEER-Projekt finden Agreement ". For more Information regarding the PEER-project Sie hier: http://www.peerproject.eu Gewährt wird ein nicht see: http://www.peerproject.eu This document is solely intended exklusives, nicht übertragbares, persönliches und beschränktes for your personal, non-commercial use.All of the copies of Recht auf Nutzung dieses Dokuments. Dieses Dokument this documents must retain all copyright information and other ist ausschließlich für den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen information regarding legal protection. You are not allowed to alter Gebrauch bestimmt. Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments this document in any way, to copy it for public or commercial müssen alle Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise purposes, to exhibit the document in public, to perform, distribute auf gesetzlichen Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses or otherwise use the document in public. Dokument nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen By using
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Systems on the Periphery Ajda Kahveci
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2005 Impact of a Women's Program for Science, Mathematics and Engineering on Undergraduate Women: Activity Systems on the Periphery Ajda Kahveci Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION IMPACT OF A WOMEN’S PROGRAM FOR SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS AND ENGINEERING ON UNDERGRADUATE WOMEN: ACTIVITY SYSTEMS ON THE PERIPHERY By AJDA KAHVECI A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Middle and Secondary Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2005 The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Ajda Kahveci defended on June 09, 2005. ________________________ Sherry A. Southerland Professor Co-Directing Dissertation ________________________ Penny J. Gilmer Professor Co-Directing Dissertation ________________________ Jeffrey P. Chanton Outside Committee Member ________________________ Owen F. Gaede Committee Member Approved: __________________________________________________ Pamela S. Carroll, Interim Chair, Department of Middle and Secondary Education The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii To Asel Müge Kahveci iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I sincerely thank my co-major professors, Dr. Sherry A. Southerland and Dr. Penny J. Gilmer for their incredible support and supervision through such a close, caring, and yet, professional relationship. I owe a great deal to Dr. Penny J. Gilmer for her guidance to the context of this research. I also would like to thank Dr. Jeffrey P. Chanton, for his lively contribution, and Dr. Owen F. Gaede, for his help.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Issues in Biology: an Approach to Teaching Writing Nadine Weidman Harvard University
    Gender Issues in Biology 61 Gender Issues in Biology: An Approach to Teaching Writing Nadine Weidman Harvard University In the spring of 1994, as I was finishing my dissertation in the de- partment of Science and Technology Studies at Cornell University, I was given the opportunity to teach my own course: a freshman writing seminar on a subject of my own choosing. Eager to step to the helm after years of TAing, I leapt at the chance. But the experience of teaching writing from a non-traditional vantage point— by means of a field other than English— was much more rewarding that I could ever have imagined. The course that I designed taught students to write by introducing them to a subset of science studies: gender issues in biology, historical and contemporary perspectives. I called the course “Women in Biology and Biology on Women.” The terrain of science studies was unfamiliar to all of my young freshmen; the value of a humanistic perspective on sci- ence, the idea that science and culture are integrally related: all this was new to them. Many of them also came to the course resisting the gender focus and all too ready to announce, “I am not a feminist!” But in the end, every student— eleven women and two men— came away with a broad- ened sense of the meanings of feminism, a heightened awareness of gen- der issues in science and, most important, an ability to think critically, argue cogently and write clearly. Because so many universities are cur- rently experimenting with teaching writing across the disciplines, I here- with offer a successful example of a course that fulfilled that ideal.
    [Show full text]