DOCSLIB.ORG

EA of Seismic Survey in the Mediterranean Sea 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EA of Seismic Survey in the Mediterranean Sea 2015 Draft Environmental Analysis of a Marine Geophysical Survey by the R/V Marcus G. Langseth in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, October–November 2015 Prepared for Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory 61 Route 9W, P.O. Box 1000 Palisades, NY 10964-8000 and National Science Foundation Division of Ocean Sciences 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 725 Arlington, VA 22230 by LGL Ltd., environmental research associates 22 Fisher St., POB 280 King City, Ont. L7B 1A6 16 April 2015 LGL Report FA0041-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................................................... vi I. PURPOSE AND NEED .................................................................................................................................. 1 Mission of NSF................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action.................................................................................... 1 Background of NSF-funded Marine Seismic Research ...................................................................... 2 Regulatory Setting .............................................................................................................................. 2 II. ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING PROPOSED ACTION ..................................................................................... 2 Proposed Action ................................................................................................................................. 2 (1) Project Objectives and Context .......................................................................................... 2 (2) Proposed Activities ............................................................................................................. 4 (3) Monitoring and Mitigation Measures ................................................................................. 6 Alternative 1: Alternative Survey Timing ....................................................................................... 13 Alternative 2: No Action Alternative .............................................................................................. 14 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Analysis ...................................................... 14 (1) Alternative E1: Alternative Location ............................................................................... 14 (2) Alternative E2: Use of Alternative Technologies ............................................................. 14 III. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................................... 14 Physical Environment and Oceanography ........................................................................................ 17 Protected Areas ................................................................................................................................. 17 Marine Mammals .............................................................................................................................. 19 (1) Mysticetes ......................................................................................................................... 23 (2) Odontocetes ...................................................................................................................... 24 Sea Turtles ........................................................................................................................................ 30 (1) Loggerhead Turtle (Caretta caretta) ................................................................................ 31 (2) Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas) ........................................................................................ 34 (3) Leatherback Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) .................................................................... 35 Seabirds ............................................................................................................................................ 35 (1) Audouin’s Gull (Larus audouinii) .................................................................................... 35 (2) Slender-billed Curlew (Numenius tenuirostris) ................................................................ 36 Fish, Essential Fish Habitat, and Habitat Areas of Particular Concern ............................................ 36 (1) Scalloped Hammerhead Shark (Sphyrna lewini) .............................................................. 36 (2) Adriatic Sturgeon (Acipenser naccarii) ............................................................................ 37 (3) European Sturgeon (Acipenser sturio) ............................................................................. 37 (4) Sawback Angelshark (Squatina aculeata) ........................................................................ 37 (5) Smoothback Angelshark (Squatina oculata) .................................................................... 37 (6) Angelshark (Squatina squatina) ....................................................................................... 38 Draft Environmental Analysis for L-DEO Eastern Mediterranean Sea, 2015 Page ii Table of Contents (7) Common Guitarfish (Rhinobatos rhinobatos) .................................................................. 38 (8) Blackchin Guitarfish (Rhinobatos cemiculus) .................................................................. 38 (9) Undulate Ray (Raja undulata) .......................................................................................... 38 Fisheries ............................................................................................................................................ 38 (1) Commercial Fisheries ....................................................................................................... 39 (2) Recreational Fisheries ...................................................................................................... 40 (3) Aquaculture ...................................................................................................................... 41 Recreational SCUBA Diving ........................................................................................................... 41 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES...................................................................................................... 41 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................................... 41 (1) Direct Effects on Marine Mammals and Sea Turtles and Their Significance .................. 41 (2) Direct Effects on Invertebrates, Fish, Fisheries, and EFH and Their Significance .......... 58 (3) Direct Effects on Seabirds and Their Significance ........................................................... 61 (4) Indirect Effects on Marine Mammals, Sea Turtles, Seabirds and Fish and Their Significance ................................................................................................................. 61 (5) Direct Effects on Recreational SCUBA Divers and Dive Sites and Their Significance ................................................................................................................. 62 (6) Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................................... 62 (7) Unavoidable Impacts ........................................................................................................ 65 (8) Coordination with Other Agencies and Processes ............................................................ 65 Alternative Action: Another Time .................................................................................................... 66 No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................................... 66 V. LIST OF PREPARERS ............................................................................................................................... 67 VI. LITERATURE CITED .............................................................................................................................. 68 Draft Environmental Analysis for L-DEO Eastern Mediterranean Sea, 2015 Page iii Abstract ABSTRACT Researchers from Oregon State University, with funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), propose to conduct a high-energy seismic survey from the R/V Marcus G. Langseth (Langseth) in the eastern Mediterranean Sea during 12 October–14 November 2015. The NSF-owned Langseth is operated by Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (L-DEO). The proposed seismic survey would use a towed array of 36 airguns with a total discharge volume of ~6600 in3. The seismic survey would take place within the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Greece, including its territorial waters, in water depths ~20–3000+ m. On behalf of L-DEO, the U.S. State Department will seek authorization from Greece for clearance to work in its EEZ. NSF, as the funding and action agency, has a mission to “promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense…”. The proposed seismic survey would collect
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dual Naming of Sea Areas in Modern Atlases and Implications for the East Sea/Sea of Japan Case
    Dual naming of sea areas in modern atlases and implications for the East Sea/Sea of Japan case Rainer DORMELS* Dual naming is, to varying extents, present in nearly all atlases. The empirical research in this paper deals with the dual naming of sea areas in about 20 atlases from different nations in the years from 2006 to 2017. Objective, quality, and size of the atlases and the country where the atlases originated from play a key role. All these characteristics of the atlases will be taken into account in the paper. In the cases of dual naming of sea areas, we can, in general, differentiate between: cases where both names are exonyms, cases where both names are endonyms, and cases where one name is an endonym, while the other is an exonym. The goal of this paper is to suggest a typology of dual names of sea areas in different atlases. As it turns out, dual names of sea areas in atlases have different functions, and in many atlases, dual naming is not a singular exception. Dual naming may help the users of atlases to orientate themselves better. Additionally, dual naming allows for providing valuable information to the users. Regarding the naming of the sea between Korea and Japan present study has achieved the following results: the East Sea/Sea of Japan is the sea area, which by far showed the most use of dual naming in the atlases examined, in all cases of dual naming two exonyms were used, even in atlases, which allow dual naming just in very few cases, the East Sea/Sea of Japan is presented with dual naming.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Centre
    Fisheries Centre The University of British Columbia Working Paper Series Working Paper #2015 - 80 Reconstruction of Syria’s fisheries catches from 1950-2010: Signs of overexploitation Aylin Ulman, Adib Saad, Kyrstn Zylich, Daniel Pauly and Dirk Zeller Year: 2015 Email: [email protected] This working paper is made available by the Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. Reconstruction of Syria’s fisheries catches from 1950-2010: Signs of overexploitation Aylin Ulmana, Adib Saadb, Kyrstn Zylicha, Daniel Paulya, Dirk Zellera a Sea Around Us, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada b President of Syrian National Committee for Oceanography, Tishreen University, Faculty of Agriculture, P.O. BOX; 1408, Lattakia, Syria [email protected] (corresponding author); [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT Syria’s total marine fisheries catches were estimated for the 1950-2010 time period using a reconstruction approach which accounted for all fisheries removals, including unreported commercial landings, discards, and recreational and subsistence catches. All unreported estimates were added to the official data, as reported by the Syrian Arab Republic to the United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Total reconstructed catch for 1950-2010 was around 170,000 t, which is 78% more than the amount reported by Syria to the FAO as their national catch. The unreported components added over 74,000 t of unreported catches, of which 38,600 t were artisanal landings, 16,000 t industrial landings, over 4,000 t recreational catches, 3,000 t subsistence catches and around 12,000 t were discards.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Cycle and Size at First Sexual Maturity of Common Pandora Pagellus Erythrinus (Sparidae) from the Bay of Monastir (Tunisia, Central Mediterranean)
    ANNALES · Ser. hist. nat. · 24 · 2014 · 1 Original scientifi c article UDK 597.556.33:591.16(262.26) Received: 2014-02-18 REPRODUCTIVE CYCLE AND SIZE AT FIRST SEXUAL MATURITY OF COMMON PANDORA PAGELLUS ERYTHRINUS (SPARIDAE) FROM THE BAY OF MONASTIR (TUNISIA, CENTRAL MEDITERRANEAN) Mohamed ALI BEN SMIDA & Nesrine HADHRI Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, 05/UR/09-05 Physiologie et Environnement aquatique, 2092 Tunis, Tunisie Aleš BOLJE Fisheries Research Institute of Slovenia, SI-1211 Ljubljana-Šmartno, Sp. Gameljne 61a, Slovenia M’hamed EL CAFSI & Rafi ka FEHRI-BEDOUI Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, 05/UR/09-05 Physiologie et Environnement aquatique, 2092 Tunis, Tunisie E-mail: rafi [email protected] ABSTRACT This study, dealing with the reproduction of the common pandora, Pagellus erythrinus (Sparidae) from the Bay of Monastir, focussed 640 specimens collected from September 2011 to August 2012. These specimens were sampled monthly during landings of coastal fi sheries. Among the whole samples, 85 individuals were not sexually identifi ed. The sexed specimens were composed of 260 males (46.84 %) and 295 (53.15 %). The monthly sex ratio showed signifi cant differences between males and females. Females outnumbered males for sizes between 130 and 199 mm, while males outnumbered females from the 200 mm size up. Sexes combined, the length-weight relationship had a negative allometry. The reproduction period of the common pandora starts in April and ends in August. The gonado- somatic index (GSI) reaches the highest values in June for males and in July for females.
    [Show full text]
  • Stomatopoda of Greece: an Annotated Checklist
    Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e47183 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e47183 Taxonomic Paper Stomatopoda of Greece: an annotated checklist Panayota Koulouri‡, Vasilis Gerovasileiou‡§, Nicolas Bailly , Costas Dounas‡ ‡ Hellenic Center for Marine Recearch (HCMR), Heraklion, Greece § WorldFish Center, Los Baños, Philippines Corresponding author: Panayota Koulouri ([email protected]) Academic editor: Eva Chatzinikolaou Received: 09 Oct 2019 | Accepted: 15 Mar 2020 | Published: 26 Mar 2020 Citation: Koulouri P, Gerovasileiou V, Bailly N, Dounas C (2020) Stomatopoda of Greece: an annotated checklist. Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e47183. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e47183 Abstract Background The checklist of Stomatopoda of Greece was developed in the framework of the LifeWatchGreece Research Infrastructure (ESFRI) project, coordinated by the Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture (IMBBC) of the Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR). The application of the Greek Taxon Information System (GTIS) of this project has been used in order to develop a complete checklist of species recorded from the Greek Seas. The objectives of the present study were to update and cross-check all the stomatopod species that are known to occur in the Greek Seas. Inaccuracies and omissions were also investigated, according to literature and current taxonomic status. New information The up-to-date checklist of Stomatopoda of Greece comprises nine species, classified to eight genera and three families. Keywords Stomatopoda, Greece, Aegean Sea, Sea of Crete, Ionian Sea, Eastern Mediterranean, checklist © Koulouri P et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gattilusj of Lesbos (1355—1462). «Me Clara Caesar Donat Leebo Ac Mytilene, Caesar, Qui Graio Praesidet Iraperio'
    The Gattilusj of Lesbos (1355—1462). «Me clara Caesar donat Leebo ac Mytilene, Caesar, qui Graio praesidet iraperio'. Corsi apud Folieta The Genoese occupation of Chios, Lesbos, and Phokaia by the families of Zaccaria and Cattaneo was not forgotten in the counting- houses of the Ligurian Republic. In 1346, two years after the capture of Smyrna, Chios once more passed under Genoese control, the two Foglie followed suite, and in 1355 the strife between John Cantacuzene and John V Palaiologos for the throne of Byzantium enabled a daring Genoese, Francesco Gattilusio, to found a dynasty in Lesbos, which gradually extended its branches to the islands of the Thracian sea and to the city of Ainos on the opposite mainland, and which lasted in the original seat for more than a Century. Disappointed in a previous attempt to recover his rights, the young Emperor John V was at this time living in retirement on the island of Tenedos, then a portion of the Greek Empire and from its position at the mouth of the Dardanelles both an excellent post of obserration and a good base for a descent upon Constantinople. During his so- journ there, a couple of Genoese galleys arrived, commanded by Fran- cesco Gattilusio, a wealthy freebooter, who had sailed from his native oity to onrvp rmt for himself, annidst the confusion of the Orient, a petty principality in the Thracian Chersonese, äs others of his compa- triots had twice done in Chios, äs the Venetian nobles had done in the Archipelago 150 years earlier. The Emperor found in this chance visi- tor an Instrument to effect his own restoration; the two men came to terms, and John V promised, that if Gattilusio would help him to recover his throne, he would bestow upon him the hand of his sister Maria — an honour similar to that conferred by Michael VIII upon Benedetto Zaccaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ionian Islands COPY
    ∆ΩΡΕΑΝ ΑΝΤΙΤΥΠΟ FREE COPY PUBLICATION GRATUITE FRA OPUSCOLO GRATUITO ITA The Ionian Islands EJEMPLAR ESP GRATUITO GRATIS- www.visitgreece.gr AUSGABE Распространяется бесплатно GREEK NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANISATION THE IONIAN ISLANDS GREEK NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANISATION 04Corfu (Kerkyra) 22Diapontia Islands 26Paxoi (Paxi) 32Lefkada 50Kefalonia 68Ithaca (Ithaki) 74Zakynthos (Zante) CONTENTS 1. Cover page: Zakynthos, Navagio beach. Its white sand and turquoise waters attract thousands of visitors each year. Ionian Islands The Ionian Islands have a temperate climate, seawaters as deep as they are refreshing, in the area, reaching 4,406 m., registered as the greatest in the Mediterranean. verdant mountains, a rich cultural heritage and a carefree spirit; the ideal combination for Their mild, temperate climate makes them the ideal choice for vacation or permanent stay. your holidays during which you will enjoy a well-developed tourism infrastructure, hotels, In the wintertime, the mainland’s mountains buffer the bitter northern winds blowing to the restaurants, water sports centres, cultural events and numerous sights, historic monuments, direction of the islands while the hot summer weather is tempered by the mild northwestern and museums. meltemia winds and the sea breeze. The area’s air currents have turned many of the Ionian Scattered along the mainland’s western coastline, the Ionian Islands are a cluster of 12 Islands’ beaches into worldwide known destinations for windsurfing. large and small islands covering an area of 2,200 sq. km. There are six large ones: Zakynthos The Ionian Islands have been inhabited since the Paleolithic times. Since then, numerous (Zante), Ithaki (Ithaca), Kerkyra (Corfu), Kefalonia (Cephallonia), Lefkada (Leucas), and invaders and cultural influences have left their stamp on the islands.
    [Show full text]
  • NATURA 2000 Network in Crete an Altitude of 1,700M
    MOUNTAINOUS AND INLAND SPECIAL AREAS OF INSULAR, COASTAL AND WETLAND AREAS CONSERVATION AND SPECIAL PROTECTION AREAS The coastal and wetland areas established in the NATURA 2000 Crete’s main characteristic is its three mountain massifs (the Lefka Network are entirely different in appearance. Low rocky expanses Ori, Psiloritis and Dikti), consisting mainly of limestone ranges with covered mainly in phrygana alternate with long beaches (ideal nesting a variety of habitats and high biodiversity. The heavily sites for Caretta Caretta Loggerhead sea turtles), dominated by saline karstified limestone terrain features resistant plant species, which occur on the sandy coasts. The steep numerous mountain plains, dolines, limestone cliffs are home to numerous chasmophytes, many of which gorges and caves, all characteristic are endemic, while sea caves even provide a refuge for Mediterranean of the Cretan monk seals (Monachus monachus). The rivers in the west and torrents landscape. in the east create estuary zones of varying sizes, rich in aquatic riparian plants, ideal for hosting of rare waterbirds, as well as characteristic habitats such as forests of Cretan palm (Phoenix theophrasti). The above mountain chains are covered with relatively sparse forests Crete’s satellite islands are of considerable aesthetic and biological Development and Promotion of the of Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia), cypress (Cupressus sempervirens), value. Alongside typical Greek and Cretan plant species, they are also prickly-oak (Quercus coccifera) and maple (Acer sempervirens) up to home to legally protected North African species. Significant habitats NATURA 2000 Network in Crete an altitude of 1,700m. Near the peaks the dominant vegetation is found on most islands include the groves of juniper (Juniperus spp.) mountain phrygana, while precipices and gorge sides are covered in growing on sandy and rocky beaches, as well as the expansive crevice plants (chasmophytes), most of which are species endemic Posidonia beds (Posidonia to Crete.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Obsidian in the Eastern Mediterranean As Indication of Early Seafaring Practices in the Area a Thesis B
    The Distribution Of Obsidian In The Eastern Mediterranean As Indication Of Early Seafaring Practices In The Area A Thesis By Niki Chartzoulaki Maritime Archaeology Programme University of Southern Denmark MASTER OF ARTS November 2013 1 Στον Γιώργο 2 Acknowledgments This paper represents the official completion of a circle, I hope successfully, definitely constructively. The writing of a Master Thesis turned out that there is not an easy task at all. Right from the beginning with the effort to find the appropriate topic for your thesis until the completion stage and the time of delivery, you got to manage with multiple issues regarding the integrated presentation of your topic while all the time and until the last minute you are constantly wondering if you handled correctly and whether you should have done this or not to do it the other. So, I hope this Master this to fulfill the requirements of the topic as best as possible. I am grateful to my Supervisor Professor, Thijs Maarleveld who directed me and advised me during the writing of this Master Thesis. His help, his support and his invaluable insight throughout the entire process were valuable parameters for the completion of this paper. I would like to thank my Professor from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Nikolaos Efstratiou who help me to find this topic and for his general help. Also the Professor of University of Crete, Katerina Kopaka, who she willingly provide me with all of her publications –and those that were not yet have been published- regarding her research in the island of Gavdos.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Tourism 2009 the National Herald, September 26, 2009
    The National Herald a b September 26, 2009 www.thenationalherald.com 2 GREEK TOURISM 2009 THE NATIONAL HERALD, SEPTEMBER 26, 2009 RELIGIOUS TOURISM Discover The Other Face of Greece God. In the early 11th century the spring, a little way beyond, were Agios Nikolaos of Philanthropenoi. first anachorites living in the caves considered to be his sacred fount It is situated on the island of Lake in Meteora wanted to find a place (hagiasma). Pamvotis in Ioannina. It was found- to pray, to communicate with God Thessalonica: The city was ed at the end of the 13th c by the and devote to him. In the 14th cen- founded by Cassander in 315 B.C. Philanthropenoi, a noble Constan- tury, Athanassios the Meteorite and named after his wife, Thessa- tinople family. The church's fres- founded the Great Meteora. Since lonike, sister of Alexander the coes dated to the 16th c. are excel- then, and for more than 600 years, Great. Paul the Apostle reached the lent samples of post-Byzantine hundreds of monks and thousands city in autumn of 49 A.D. painting. Visitors should not miss in of believers have travelled to this Splendid Early Christian and the northern outer narthex the fa- holy site in order to pray. Byzantine Temples of very impor- mous fresco depicting the great The monks faced enormous tant historical value, such as the Greek philosophers and symboliz- problems due to the 400 meter Acheiropoietos (5th century A.D.) ing the union between the ancient height of the Holy Rocks. They built and the Church of the Holy Wisdom Greek spirit and Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Sharks and Rays in the Israeli Mediterranean
    Plan of Action for Protection of Sharks and Rays in the Israeli Mediterranean 2016 II Written by: Asaf Ariel, Adi Barash With comments from: Aviad Scheinin, Oren Sonin, Eric Diamant, Dor Adalist, Danny Golani, Danny Chernov, Menachem Goren, Eran Brokovitch, Tomer Kochen and Ruth Yahel Translation: Jennifer Levin Graphic Design: Yael Jicchaki-Golan Photography: Uri Ferro, Aviram Waldman, Aviad Scheinin, Adi Barash, Haggai Netiv, Shai Milat, Guy Hadash, Hod Ben Hurin, Charles Roffey, Brian Gratwicke Cover and back jacket photography: Uri Ferro Recommended citation: Ariel, A. and Barash, A. (2015). Action Plan for Protection of Sharks and Rays in the Israeli Mediterranean. EcoOcean Association. III Photography: Aviram Valdman, www.thetower.org/article/photos-worlds-beneath-the-sacred-waters,'Tower Magazine' IV Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................1 1. Introduction.......................................................................................3 1.1 The Objective of the Proposed Action Plan ....................................3 1.2 About the Model for the Action Plan .............................................3 2. Background .......................................................................................5 2.1 Sharks and rays and their ecological importance ......................5 2.2 Sharks and rays in the Mediterranean and in the coastal waters of Israel ............................................................................6 2.3 Factors that
    [Show full text]
  • Cop18 Doc. 105.3
    CoP18 Doc.105.3 Annex 14 (English only/seulement en anglais/unicamente en inglés Ref: DC44-2019 Wellington, 12 March 2019 To: Ivonne Higuero Secretary-General CITES Secretariat International Environmental House Geneva, Switzerland Subject: SPRFMO consultation on CoP18 proposals to amend CITES Appendix II Dear Ms Higuero, I am writing in response to your letter (reference IH/TDM/DR) in which you advise that the 18th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES has received proposals to amend CITES Appendix II in relation to the following marine species: • Include Glaucostegus spp.; • Include Isurus oxyrinchus and Isurus paucus; • Include Rhinidae spp.; and, • Include Holothuria (Microthele) fuscogilva, Holothuria (Microthele) nobilis and Holothuria (Microthele) whitmaei. Please find attached to this letter an additional document containing scientific data and information that we trust will assist the Parties to CITES in their consideration of the CoP18 proposals. Yours sincerely, Craig Loveridge SPRFMO Data Manager South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation PO Box 3797, Wellington 6140, New Zealand. T : +64 4 499 9889 - F : +64 4 473 9579 – E : [email protected] 18th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES Colombo, Sri Lanka 23 May to 3 June 2019 Submission by the SPRFMO Secretariat The Secretariat of the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO) is pleased to be able to provide the following information for consideration by the 18th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES (2019). Conservation and Management Measures (CMMs) SPRFMO while still being a relatively young RFMO has implemented very detailed reporting requirements. These requirements are fully described in CMM 02-2018 (Data-Standards).
    [Show full text]