Business Corruption: Incidence, Mechanisms, and Consequences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Business Corruption: Incidence, Mechanisms, and Consequences Business corruption: Incidence, mechanisms, and consequences Tina Søreide Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) Thesis submitted for the degree of dr. oecon at the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) Bergen, Norway 9 February 2006 Acknowledgments A PhD study is an individual activity and responsibility. During this study, however, I have benefited from constructive feedback and support. I have met a large number of interesting people, and I have been working in a friendly and stimulating atmosphere at Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI). Kjetil Bjorvatn has guided me through the process. Repeatedly I was impressed by his combination of critical comments and humor. I am very grateful for his understanding, as well as his comprehensive and rapid response. I also got the benefit of working with two excellent supervisors, Kalle Moene and Susan Rose-Ackerman. Their opinions and corrections have been important, and I have truly appreciated their friendly attitude. My stay as a visiting scholar at Yale University during the spring of 2003 was inspiring, and I wish to thank Susan for inviting me. The PhD study, the stay in New Haven included, has been financed by the Norwegian Research Council, and I am very grateful for their support. The Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise (NHO) gave me substantial backing and encouragement during my empirical studies. I wish to thank them a lot. I will also express gratitude to the survey interviewees and respondents who supported my project with their time and their confidence. The study would not have been started without encouragement from Odd-Helge Fjeldstad, Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås, Arve Ofstad, and support from the CMI administration. I am grateful for the many useful and motivating comments from all colleagues at CMI, the group of economists in particular. In addition, I would like to thank the librarians for valuable assistance. I regret that I could not spend more time at NHH. This is an inspiring environment, and I appreciated discussions with staff and students at the Department of Economics. Finally, a deep thank to my husband, Olav, for all forms of support, and for many useful discussions. Thanks also to my children Eirik, Camilla and Julia, they are happy to have realized that PhD studies are voluntary undertakings. Finally thanks to my parents and parents in law for kind support. Tina Søreide TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………. 1 1 The phenomenon of corruption and economic theory 2 Business corruption 3 This thesis: incidence, mechanisms, and consequences 4 Policy implications of the research CHAPTER 1 IS IT WRONG TO RANK?.................................................................................... 13 1 INFORMATION ABOUT CORRUPTION 2 LIMITS OF THE CPI 2.1 Construction and interpretations 2.2 Crimes or legal activities 2.3 Perceptions and the actual extent of corruption 2.4 Implications of publicity 3 PROPOSALS 3.1 Reduce precision in the presentation of the CPI 3.2 Increase the CPI’s value as an anti-corruption tool 4 CONCLUSION CHAPTER 2 CORRUPTION IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS: A SURVEY…... 31 1 INTRODUCTION 2 THE SURVEY 3 EXPERIENCE OF CORRUPTION 3.1 The embassy perspective 3.2 The firms’ experience 4 WHICH FIRMS ARE INVOLVED IN BRIBERY? 4.1 Size 4.2 Sector 4.3 Competitive pressure 4.4 The length of experience from international markets 4.5 The type of experience from international markets 4.6 Home country norms and activities abroad 5 RESPONSES TO CORRUPTION 5.1 Strategic choices 5.2 Tolerance of corruption 5.3 Local business practices and the use of agents and advisers 5.4 Motivation behind bribery 6 CORRUPTION AND TENDER PROCEDURES 6.1 Influence on tenders 6.2 Pre-determination of contracts 6.3 Do tender rules prevent corruption? 6.4 The rules of communication 6.5 Political pressure 7 INTERNAL CONTROL AND MEASURES 7.1 Codes of conduct, control-routines and campaigns 7.2 Company culture and the responsibility in case of a scandal 8 CONCLUSION CHAPTER 3 BEATEN BY BRIBERY: WHY NOT BLOW THE WHISTLE?.................................. 67 1 INTRODUCTION 2 WHY NOT REACT? 2.1 Market incentives 2.2 Local judicial institutions 2.3 Political corruption 3 CONCLUSION CHAPTER 4 BUSINESS CORRUPTION, UNCERTAINTY AND RISK AVERSION ……………… 91 1 INTRODUCTION 2 THE PERSPECTIVE OF FIRMS 3 UNCERTAINTY AND BRIBERY 3.1 Assumptions 3.2 Comparative statics 3.3 Overestimating the level of corruption 4 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF RISK AVERSION 4.1 Results on risk aversion and rent-seeking 4.2 The relevance to business corruption 4.3 Risk aversion and the propensity to offer bribes 4.4 Discussion 5 CONCLUSION CHAPTER 5 CORRUPTION AND PRIVATIZATION ………………………………………. 121 1 INTRODUCTION 2 THE MODEL 3 CONCLUDING REMARKS APPENDIX BUSINESS SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE ……………………………….. 137 EMBASSY SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE ……………………………..... 147 Introduction The phenomenon of corruption and economic theory Corruption is often defined as the misuse of entrusted authority for personal benefit. The authority is usually public or political. A decision has been made that deviates from the official aim of the institution that holds authority. Through corruption some people have obtained benefits they would not get hold of otherwise. These people represent the two sides of corruption. One has offered a bribe, and the other has abused his or her office. Both parties to the transaction will benefit, though the way the spoils are shared between them will depend on their respective negotiating powers.1 The functions of public and political institutions are affected when the practice of making such agreements is common. The consequences in a country can be considerable. Several authors have found a correlation between economic growth and perceived extents of corruption in statistical studies that include a large number of countries.2 Corruption has indeed motivated to research, and several of its welfare consequences have been examined in an economic perspective. Today it is bizarre that some of the early contributions defended corruption in terms of promoting economic growth. Huntington (1968) described corruption as the way of approaching "an over- centralized bureaucracy" (Huntington, 1968:386), an opinion he shared with Leff (1964). This interpretation has largely fallen out of favor in economic theory, as elsewhere. Myrdal (1968) was one of the first to challenge the ‘grease money’ model by showing how bribery creates incentives for civil servants to put pressure on potential bribers, and actually causes bureaucratic delays.3 A broader critique was provided by Rose-Ackerman (1978) who described corruption as an obstacle to welfare from several different perspectives, including that of firms. The conclusions have been supported, specified and elaborated in a number of studies, including those by Lui (1985), Hillman and Katz (1987), Besley and McLaren (1993); several authors have explained the persistence of the problem (Andvig and Moene, 1990; Banerjee, 1997; Tanzi, 1995); and we got case studies of the phenomenon that played important roles in communicating the nature of the problem, see for example Wade (1982) and Klitgaard (1988). During the 1980s and up until earlier 1990s, the main development in this field of economic theory was concerned with the broader rent-seeking perspective. This trend started with the early works of Tullock (1967), Krueger (1974) and Bhagwati (1982). The welfare implications of various forms of rent-seeking were determined, as were 1 See Rose-Ackerman (1999), Bardhan (1997) and Aidt (2003) broader explanation and categorization of different circumstances of corruption. 2 See Mauro (1995), Mo (2001), Gyimah-Prempong (2002), Pellegrini and Gerlagh (2004), Kaufmann, Kray and Mastruzzi (2006). 3 This theory was empirically supported by Kaufmann and Wei (1999). 1 the propensity of various actors to take part in rent-seeking. However, very few authors made a distinction between legal and illegal forms of rent-seeking, and much of this literature lacks the perspective that is necessary to understand corruption.4 Lambsdorff (2002) explains why the welfare consequences from corruption differ from those of legal rent-seeking. He points particularly at the analytical significance of personal benefits obtained by the one who receives a bribe; legal rent-seeking will often occur as an annoyance to the decision-maker in question. The focus on corruption in economic research increased significantly after Mauro’s (1995) influential paper determining a correlation between corruption and poor economic growth, and the World Bank's focus on this problem. The consequences of corruption have now been shown to materialize in very different ways.5 I will not present a complete overview of this literature. However, an important feature of corruption turns out to be its ability to produce less direct welfare consequences. For instance, corruption may encourage civil servants to seek positions that offer the best opportunity to obtain bribes, in that way influence the function of public institutions.6 It may result in deliberated delays and obstacles in the reform of business regulations in order to obtain personal benefits for civil servants, such as those relating to the issue of licenses and permits, or the persistence of inefficient business-regulations that easily could be reformed. The resulting transaction cost imposed on firms is in itself a barrier to trade and investments, and has been shown to have serious consequences for the development of trade and industry, especially
Recommended publications
  • 2014 Rule of Law Report | SGI Sustainable Governance Indicators
    Sustainable Governance Indicators SGI 2014 Rule of Law Report Legal Certainty, Judicial Review, Appointment of Justices, Corruption Prevention SGI 2014 | 2 Rule of Law Report Indicator Legal Certainty Question To what extent do government and administration act on the basis of and in accordance with legal provisions to provide legal certainty? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = Government and administration act predictably, on the basis of and in accordance with legal provisions. Legal regulations are consistent and transparent, ensuring legal certainty. 8-6 = Government and administration rarely make unpredictable decisions. Legal regulations are consistent, but leave a large scope of discretion to the government or administration. 5-3 = Government and administration sometimes make unpredictable decisions that go beyond given legal bases or do not conform to existing legal regulations. Some legal regulations are inconsistent and contradictory. 2-1 = Government and administration often make unpredictable decisions that lack a legal basis or ignore existing legal regulations. Legal regulations are inconsistent, full of loopholes and contradict each other. Estonia Score 10 The rule of law is fundamental to Estonian government and administration. In the period of transition from communism to liberal democracy, most of the legal acts and regulations had to be amended or introduced for the first time. Joining the European Union in 2004 caused another major wave of legal reforms. These fast and radical changes, which occurred in a short timespan, caused some inconsistencies and unexpected legal amendments (for example the increase of the VAT in 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    CMIREPORT Collaboration on Anti-Corruption Norway and Brazil Tina Søreide and Claudio Weber Abramo R 2008: 1 Collaboration on Anti-Corruption Norway and Brazil Tina Søreide and Claudio Weber Abramo R 2008: 1 CMI Reports This series can be ordered from: Chr. Michelsen Institute P.O. Box 6033 Postterminalen, N-5892 Bergen, Norway Tel: + 47 55 57 40 00 Fax: + 47 55 57 41 66 E-mail: [email protected] www.cmi.no Price: NOK 50 Printed version: ISSN 0805-505X Electronic version: ISSN 1890-503X Printed version: ISBN 978-82-8062-227-3 Electronic version: ISBN 978-82-8062-228-0 This report is also available at: www.cmi.no/publications Cover photo: Isabel Pauletti Indexing terms Project number 27069 Project title Collaboration on Anti-Corruption - Norway and Brazil CMI REPORT COLLABORATION ON ANTI-CORRUPTION R 2008: 1 About the authors Tina Søreide is a Norwegian economist at Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI), an independent research institute based in Norway. Claudio Weber Abramo is the executive director of Transparência Brasil, an NGO dedicated to combating corruption in Brazil. About this report Much has been said about anti-corruption initiatives, about the causes and consequences of corruption, and about what governments can do to combat this problem. Most discussions and policy recommendations focus on what governments can do within their jurisdictions. This report takes a different approach by exploring how countries and players can combat corruption through cross-border collaboration. Bilateral collaboration and Norwegian presence in Brazilian markets The report argues that the fight against corruption needs stronger transnational cooperation and attempts to map out issues that might be relevant for such collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Review Report of Norway
    Country Review Report of Norway Review by Sweden and Kuwait of the implementation by Norway of articles 15 – 42 of Chapter III. “Criminalization and law enforcement” and articles 44 – 50 of Chapter IV. “International cooperation” of the United Nations Convention against Corruption for the review cycle 2010 - 2015 Page 1 of 142 Introduction 1. The Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption (hereinafter, UNCAC or the Convention) was established pursuant to article 63 of the Convention to, inter alia, promote and review the implementation of the Convention. 2. In accordance with article 63, paragraph 7, of the Convention, the Conference established at its third session, held in Doha from 9 to 13 November 2009, the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the Convention. The Mechanism was established also pursuant to article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention, which states that States parties shall carry out their obligations under the Convention in a manner consistent with the principles of sovereign equality and territorial integrity of States and of non-intervention in the domestic affairs of other States. 3. The Review Mechanism is an intergovernmental process whose overall goal is to assist States parties in implementing the Convention. 4. The review process is based on the terms of reference of the Review Mechanism. II. Process 5. The following review of the implementation by Norway of the Convention is based on the completed response to the comprehensive self-assessment checklist received from Norway, and any supplementary information provided in accordance with paragraph 27 of the terms of reference of the Review Mechanism and the outcome of the constructive dialogue between Norway and the governmental experts from Kuwait and Sweden, by means of telephone conferences and e-mail exchanges and involving Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 3 Report on Implementing the Oecd Anti
    PHASE 3 REPORT ON IMPLEMENTING THE OECD ANTI-BRIBERY CONVENTION IN NORWAY June 2011 This Phase 3 Report on Norway by the OECD Working Group on Bribery evaluates and makes recommendations on Norway’s implementation of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and the 2009 Recommendation of the Council for Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. It was adopted by the Working Group on 23 June 2011. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 5 A. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 6 1. The on-site visit .................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Outline of the report.............................................................................................................................. 6 3. Economic Background.......................................................................................................................... 7 4. Cases involving the bribery of foreign public
    [Show full text]
  • (Organised) Crime: the Case of the European Road Freight Transport Sector Tom Vander Beken, Karen Verpoest, Annemie Bucquoye, and Melanie Defruytier 19
    THE ORGANISED CRIME ECONOMY Managing crime markets in Europe View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Salford Institutional Repository THE ORGANISED CRIME ECONOMY Managing crime markets in Europe Petrus C. van Duyne Klaus von Lampe Maarten van Dijck James L. Newell (editors) a THE ORGANISED CRIME ECONOMY, Managing crime markets in Europe. Petrus C. van Duyne, Klaus von Lampe, Maarten van Dijck and James L. Newell (Eds.). Wolf Legal Publishers (WLP), 2005, ISBN: 90 5850 144 2. This volume contains a selection of the papers presented at the 6th Cross-border Crime Colloquium, held in September 2004 in Berlin, Germany. The project was supported by the University of Tilburg (the Netherlands) and the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (Berlin, Germany). For more information on the Cross-border Crime Colloquia visit the website at http://www.cross-border-crime.net. Copies of this volume can be ordered at: aolf Legal Publishers Postbus 31051 6503 CB Nijmegen The Netherlands +31 24 355 1904 (phone) +31 24 355 4827 (fax) [email protected] http://www.wlp.biz Table of contents Crime and commercial activity: an introduction to two half-brothers Petrus C. van Duyne 1 The vulnerability of economic sectors to (organised) crime: the case of the European road freight transport sector Tom Vander Beken, Karen Verpoest, Annemie Bucquoye, and Melanie Defruytier 19 Controling the flow of money or satisfying the regulators? Jacky Harvey 43 Electronic payment systems and money laundering: beyond the internet
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Study of Anti-Corruption Policies and Practices in Nordic
    Empirical Study of Anti-Corruption Policies and Practices in Nordic Countries The purpose of this research is to compile turally, Nordic countries tend to see a high Introduction and analyze information on corruption in level of social cohesion, and thus ordinary Nordic countries as well as the tools and citizens feel less of a need to engage in acts practices used to combat corruption in of corruption such as bribery. However, the order to identify effective practices which construction and service industries are ma- then could be implemented in Latvia. The jor sectors contributing to the shadow econ- countries we studied are Denmark, Iceland, omies of Nordic countries. Foreign bribery Finland, Norway, and Sweden. also remains a problem in most of Nordic countries, and the major example of the Te- The research is constructed by separately lia case will be examined. Despite thorough analyzing each country’s anti-corruption regulations on political party financing and framework, and the nature of its public asset disclosure for public officials, no Nor- and private sectors in regards to combat- dic countries have regulations on lobbying ting corruption, as well as the role played in place. by civic empowerment in each country. The sources used aim to be as recent as pos- Though there is some overlap in terms of sible, with most coming from the past five legislation combatting corruption in Nor- years, however older sources are occasion- dic countries, there are tools and practices ally referenced when pertinent. specific to individual countries as well. For example, Norway’s National Authority for In- Certain trends regarding corruption can be vestigation and Prosecution of Economic and identified across the Nordic countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis
    The Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric, is the international gateway for the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU). Eight departments, associated research institutions and the Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine in Oslo. Established in 1986, Noragric’s contribution to international development lies in the interface between research, education (Bachelor, Master and PhD programmes) and assignments. The Noragric Master thesis are the final theses submitted by students in order to fulfil the requirements under the Noragric Master programme “International Environmental Studies”, “International Development Studies” and “International Relations”. The findings in this thesis do not necessarily reflect the views of Noragric. Extracts from this publication may only be reproduced after prior consultation with the author and on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation contact Noragric. © Aleksey Losev, May 2015 [email protected] Noragric Department of International Environment and Development Studies P.O. Box 5003 N-1432 Ås Norway Tel.: +47 64 96 52 00 Fax: +47 64 96 52 01 Internet: http://www.nmbu.no/noragric i Declaration I, Aleksey Losev, declare that this thesis is a result of my research investigations and findings. Sources of information other than my own have been acknowledged and a reference list has been appended. This work has not been previously submitted to any other university for award of any type of academic degree. Signature……………………………….. Date………………………………………… ii Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank my main supervisor, Åse Berit Grødeland for solid and valuable support during all planning and writing stages of my thesis including the search of appropriate theoretical literature and informants for my qualitative research.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Norway's Public Procurement System
    ASSESSMENT OF NORWAY’S PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM 2018 Testing the new methodology Assessment of Norway’s public procurement system TESTING THE NEW METHODOLOGY Table of Contents Executive summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Country Context ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Political Situation and Society of Norway ................................................................................................. 7 Economic situation .................................................................................................................................... 8 Geostrategic situation ............................................................................................................................. 10 The Norwegian Public Procurement System .......................................................................................... 10 Synthesis of findings ................................................................................................................................... 13 Pillar I: Legal, Regulatory, and Policy Framework ................................................................................... 13 Pillar II: Institutional Framework
    [Show full text]
  • Rule of Law Report | SGI Sustainable Governance Indicators 2018
    Rule of Law Report Legal Certainty, Judicial Review, Appointment of Justices, Corruption Prevention m o c . e b o d a . k c Sustainable Governance o t s - e g Indicators 2018 e v © Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2018 | 1 Rule of Law Indicator Legal Certainty Question To what extent do government and administration act on the basis of and in accordance with legal provisions to provide legal certainty? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = Government and administration act predictably, on the basis of and in accordance with legal provisions. Legal regulations are consistent and transparent, ensuring legal certainty. 8-6 = Government and administration rarely make unpredictable decisions. Legal regulations are consistent, but leave a large scope of discretion to the government or administration. 5-3 = Government and administration sometimes make unpredictable decisions that go beyond given legal bases or do not conform to existing legal regulations. Some legal regulations are inconsistent and contradictory. 2-1 = Government and administration often make unpredictable decisions that lack a legal basis or ignore existing legal regulations. Legal regulations are inconsistent, full of loopholes and contradict each other. Estonia Score 10 The rule of law is fundamental to Estonian government and administration. In the period of transition from communism to liberal democracy, most legal acts and regulations had to be amended or introduced for the first time. Joining the European Union in 2004 caused another major wave of legal reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Critiquing Corruption: a Turn to Theory
    the author(s) 2015 ISSN 1473-2866 (Online) ISSN 2052-1499 (Print) www.ephemerajournal.org volume 15(2): 319-336 Critiquing corruption: A turn to theory Eric Breit, Thomas Taro Lennerfors, Lena Olaison Introduction Over the past two decades, the will to fight corruption has increased in society at large. Consequently, the importance of effective anti-corruption measures has expanded into a global political agenda with the OECD, the World Bank and the UN in the forefront. Historically, corruption has been seen as an issue in the public sector, defined as the ‘the misuse of public office for private gain’ (The World Bank Group, 2012). The scope has since been broadened to include other sectors, as illustrated in the widely used, post-Enron definition by Transparency International: ‘the abuse of entrusted power for private gain’ (Transparency International, 2009, italics added). Since 2003, when the OECD promoted a stricter definition of corruption, bribes, kickbacks and embezzlement are supplemented by practices such as illicit gifts, favours, nepotism, and informal promises (OECD, 2003a; 2003b; Lennerfors, 2008; Brown and Cloke, 2011; Breit, 2011). As the OECD puts it: ‘although, at a conceptual level, corruption is easy to define […] corruption is a multi-layered phenomenon that may not always lend itself to neat definitions’ (2003a: 117). The increased attention to corruption and anti-corruption has also led to a ‘corruption boom’ (Torsello, 2013: 313) in which corruption has been approached and theorized in various ways. Corruption is discussed in fields as diverse as economics, political science, anthropology, sociology, history, organization studies, international business, business ethics, psychology, and philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ORGANISED CRIME ECONOMY Managing Crime Markets in Europe
    THE ORGANISED CRIME ECONOMY Managing crime markets in Europe THE ORGANISED CRIME ECONOMY Managing crime markets in Europe Petrus C. van Duyne Klaus von Lampe Maarten van Dijck James L. Newell (editors) a THE ORGANISED CRIME ECONOMY, Managing crime markets in Europe. Petrus C. van Duyne, Klaus von Lampe, Maarten van Dijck and James L. Newell (Eds.). Wolf Legal Publishers (WLP), 2005, ISBN: 90 5850 144 2. This volume contains a selection of the papers presented at the 6th Cross-border Crime Colloquium, held in September 2004 in Berlin, Germany. The project was supported by the University of Tilburg (the Netherlands) and the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (Berlin, Germany). For more information on the Cross-border Crime Colloquia visit the website at http://www.cross-border-crime.net. Copies of this volume can be ordered at: aolf Legal Publishers Postbus 31051 6503 CB Nijmegen The Netherlands +31 24 355 1904 (phone) +31 24 355 4827 (fax) [email protected] http://www.wlp.biz Table of contents Crime and commercial activity: an introduction to two half-brothers Petrus C. van Duyne 1 The vulnerability of economic sectors to (organised) crime: the case of the European road freight transport sector Tom Vander Beken, Karen Verpoest, Annemie Bucquoye, and Melanie Defruytier 19 Controling the flow of money or satisfying the regulators? Jacky Harvey 43 Electronic payment systems and money laundering: beyond the internet hype Ton Schudelaro 65 An assessment of prospective changes in cross-border crime after Estonia’s accession to the European Union Anna Markina and Jüri Saar 91 The crusaders: Swedish companies in Russia and the Baltic states handling uncertainty and criminal threats Nils Bagelius 107 Adventure capitalism and economic crime in the countries of transition: the case of the Czech Republic Miroslav Scheinost, Vladimir Baloun and Drahuse Kaderabkova 143 Criminal sub-contracting in the Netherlands: the Dutch ‘koppelbaas’ as crime-entrepreneur Petrus C.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Grabbing Hand” of Corruption and FDI- a Norwegian Case Study
    BI Norwegian Business School – Thesis -The “Grabbing Hand” of Corruption and FDI- A Norwegian Case study Hand-in date: 30.08.2012 Campus: BI Oslo Programme: Master of Science in Political Economy Supervisor: Professor Anne Welle-Strand Student: Julie Haugli ID number: 0814321 This thesis is a part of the MSc program at BI Norwegian Business School. The school takes no responsibility for the methods used, results found and conclusions drawn. Master Thesis GRA 19003 MSc in Political Economy Acknowledgments I would like to offer my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Professor Anne Welle- Strand who has supported me and given me valuable feedback during the making of this thesis. Her encouragement and support, as well as the research lab she have started, have been an asset of great importance. With this, I would also like to thank my fellow thesis-writing students in the research lab for all their great feedback during the last months. _________________________ Julie Haugli Oslo, 30.08.2012 Page i Master Thesis GRA 19003 MSc in Political Economy Abstract The objective of this thesis has been to investigate to what extent there is a correlation between corruption and Foreign Direct Investments. Additionally, a case study on Norway and to what extent Norwegian Multi National Companies relate to investments in corrupt economies is added. As a general framework this thesis builds upon the “grabbing hand” theory of corruption (Shleifer and Vishny 1998). Assuming that all public officials are self-interested, corruption is an inevitable part of an economy unless regulations are put in place to ensure that corruption is illegal.
    [Show full text]