DOCSLIB.ORG

Case History Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case History Index CASE HISTORY INDEX Clerk of the Superior Court Maricopa County, AZ Updated through 2018 PRINTING INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CASE HISTORY INDEX The Case History Index has been divided into six sections. You may view or print the entire document or only that section that is relevant for your current needs. The Case History section contains a glossary of terms and several special interest areas for those seeking a more complete view of the history of records in the custody of the Clerk of Court’s Office. It also contains specific information on how to research case categories that have exception requirements. The Adult, Juvenile and Marriage License Index sections are listings of all Superior Court cases by category, number and year, along with their totals and growth percentages from year to year. The Adult and Juvenile Charts are supplied as visual attachments to the information supplied in the Case History index, offering different interpretations of the data and how some of the Index information relates to Maricopa County population growth. 1 MARICOPA COUNTY – CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT JEFF FINE The Clerk of Superior Court’s Office was established by the Arizona Constitution as an elected office with specific and special duties, primarily to serve as the official record keeper and financial officer for the Superior Court. The functions of the Clerk of the Court satisfy more than 500 state statutes and court rules. One of the major functions for which the Clerk is responsible is to receive, distribute and preserve official records for all Superior Court actions; i.e., civil, criminal, juvenile, probate, tax, and domestic relations matters. The Case History Index was originally created to show the yearly growth percentage for cases filed with the Clerk of Superior Court’s Office. It has since evolved to include some historical information, and provide location and access information, as well as summary figures, for each case category. Additionally, in late 1997, the Clerk’s Office, with Superior Court, developed a Web site for access to the Clerk’s Office Docket. …The office of the Clerk can be traced back to the year 1272 AD in the History of Corporation of Old London. In the 1500’s in England there was not only the Towne Clarcke, but also the Clerc Comptroller of the King’s Honorable Household. In 1603, there was a Clarke general of the Armie. King Henry VIII had a Clarke of the Spicery. When the early colonists came to America, they set up forms of local government to which they had become accustomed, and the Office of the Clerk was one of the first established. The colony at Plymouth appointed a person to act as the recorder. Over the years, Clerks have become the hub of the government, the direct link between the residents and their government. Their Clerk is the historian of the county, for the entire recorded history of the county and its people are in his care. …reprinted from the IACREOT NEWS, March 1998 On March 21, 2006 Supreme Court Administrative Order 2006-029, Arizona Code of Judicial Administration 3- 402: Superior Court Records Retention and Disposition was signed replacing Administrative Order 1991-013. A.R.S. 41-1339 requires Superior Court Clerks to transfer permanent files to the Director of the Arizona State Library, Archives, and Public Records (ASLAPR) at the end of their prescribed retention period pursuant to court rules. Rule 29, Rules of the Supreme Court requires the court to adopt retention and disposition schedules and purge lists for the court records. Extensive background work spanning the course of several years established a more efficient and effective guide for preserving for the official record for all Superior Court actions, as is reflected in this new Administrative Order, as well as becoming the forefront leading towards the electronic court record. For additional Records information, please contact the Clerk’s Office at (602) 372-5375, or through the web page address at http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov 2 1/1/07 Initiative (Supreme Court Administrative Order 2006-96) January 1, 2007 was a significant milestone for the Clerk’s Office. It was the day that Clerk of the Court, Michael Jeanes, implemented an end to placing paper documents received into hard copy files (adult case types only), eliminating the need for folders to be created and maintained for cases filed on and after 1/1/07. Instead, the paper documents filed are scanned, audited, and then disposed of after a series of quality checks for accuracy are completed. To achieve this major goal, the Office obtained Supreme Court Administrative Order 2006-96 authorizing the Clerk of the Superior Court in Maricopa County to dispose of certain paper filings after their electronic image is captured and maintained, ensuring the Office complied with all minimum standards and requirements for access, availability and retention while maintaining multiple electronic backup systems to access and preserve active and archived court records; thus, recognizing the Electronic Court Record (ECR) as the original. Pursuant to the Order, the “original” document is the electronic image of that document as maintained in the Clerk of the Superior Court’s Electronic Document Management System (EDMS). As a result of this progress, customers who request a file from 2002 to the present date are referred to the Public Access Terminals available at customer service locations to view the record. The hard copy file is no longer pulled from the fileroom, as it would not represent the complete record. Some documents exempt from this process, pending further order of the court, include lower court appeals documents, original administrative records under review, paper bonds, wills, criminal sentencing minute entries, juvenile documents, water documents, and depositions and transcripts. In accordance with the Administrative Order, the Office disposed of the first box of court documents in March 2007. The box contained 2,500 documents and 6,000 pages. Paper documents placed in hard copy files fill hundreds of shelving units that require a tremendous amount of space and maintenance with required staffing levels to process and transport requested case files and documents to court divisions and various other customers. Disposing of paper documents saves a significant amount of storage space for the Office, along with associated cost for the County. By ending the operational demand of pulling and delivering court case files that are now available electronically, the Office is able to focus its resources on better managing access to the electronic court record and on processing the increasing number of Superior Court filings. “Transporting” these documents or case files is now performed at the click of a button allowing a multitude of customers to access electronic court records simultaneously; a most efficient and effective process for providing access instantaneously and a “win-win” situation for all. Based upon the continued ongoing success of this initiative, the Clerk received authorization from the AOC to rely on electronic images of court records in lieu of paper case records on September 20, 2011. Accordingly, there is no longer a need for an Electronic Court Record Pilot Project in the Superior Court in Maricopa County. For further information on Administrative Order 2006-96, you may access the following link: http://www.supreme.state.az.us/orders/admorder/Orders06/2006-96.pdf MARRIAGE RULING The Federal Court ruled that Arizona’s constitutional and statutory definitions of marriage as one man and one woman is unconstitutional under the United States Constitution. Effective October 17, 2014, Clerks of Superior Court around the state began issuing marriage licenses regardless of the applicants’ gender. 3 CLERKS OF THE COURT YEAR ELECTED/APPOINTED CLERKS OF THE COURT 1912 W.E. Thomas 1914 James Miller 1918 C.S. Berryman 1926 Walter S. Wilson 1930 Walter S. Wilson 1934 Walter S. Wilson 1938 Walter S. Wilson 1942 Walter S. Wilson 1946 Walter S. Wilson 1950 Walter S. Wilson 1954 Walter S. Wilson 1958 Walter S. Wilson 1962 Robert Miller 1966 W. Don Palmer 1970 W. Don Palmer 1974 W. Don Palmer 1978 W. Don Palmer 1982 Vivian Kringle 1986 Judith Allen 1990 Judith Allen 1994 Judith Allen 1997 (acting) Michael Jeanes 1998 (appointed in Feb.) Michael Jeanes 1998 (elected in Nov.) Michael Jeanes 2002 Michael Jeanes 2006 Michael Jeanes 2010 Michael Jeanes 2014 Michael Jeanes 2018 (appointed in Apr.) Chris DeRose 2018 (elected in Nov.) Jeff Fine 4 GLOSSARY A & C Additions & Corrections: Process of updating a record previously microfilmed where newer or amended documents will exist on a separate roll of film. Active Records that are considered to have current or recent activity. ASLAPR The Arizona State Library, Archives, and Public Records. The facility encompasses the Archives Division and Record Management Division. CCB Central Court Building: 201 W. Jefferson St. Phoenix, Arizona 85003 CARS Computer Assisted Retrieval System: A microfilm tracking database that indicates the microfilm roll and frame number on which a specific record is located. Case Transfer Cases can be transferred between satellite courts. For example, if a Downtown case is transferred to SEA, the case is assigned a new case number. Statistically this would slightly inflate the overall growth percentage. CSC Clerk of Court Customer Service Center: 601 W. Jackson St. Phoenix, Arizona 85003. DJC Downtown Justice Center: 620 W. Jackson St. Phoenix, Arizona 85003 FC Family Court With Children, a case category beginning 2/5/01 where minor children are common to the parties involved. FN Family Court With No Children, a case category beginning 2/5/01 where no minor children are common to the parties involved. Fiche A diminutive of “microfiche”. These records have been microfilmed and are case specific to film jacket. The film is in flat format.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • November/December 2008, Vol 17
    SPECIAL EDITION Fall Conference • Top Urban Educator, p.2 • Immigration Issues, p. 3 • Conference Pictorial, p.9 • Ballot Results, p.10 The Nation’s Voice for Urban Education November/December 2008 Vol. 17, No. 8 www.cgcs.org New President Focus of Town Hall Meeting HOUSTON—Urban school leaders hosting the Council conference, called voiced their thoughts on “An Urban Edu- for national standards to measure school cation Agenda for the New President,” performance. “We can’t have a federal ac- the topic of a national town hall meeting countability system without national stan- held in conjunction with the Council of dards,” he stressed. the Great City Schools’ 52nd Annual Fall Lisa Graham Keegan, senior education Conference, Oct. 22-26, in Texas’ largest adviser to Sen. John McCain’s campaign, Letter to New President city. (View Town Hall Meeting) said that McCain does not believe in im- A packed ballroom of educators heard plementing mandatory national standards. HOUSTON—The Council of the from a panel that included education advis- Jonathan Schnur, who represented then- Great City Schools issued an Open Let- ers of the two presidential candidates, who Senator and now President-elect Barack ter to the Next President of the United faced off in a lively 90-minute discussion Obama, noted that Obama wants more States at its Fall Conference here. The moderated by noted journalist Dan Rather, consistency around high standards, and letter, featured in its entirety on page 6, global correspondent and managing editor wants to work with states and the federal reaches out to President-elect Barack of Dan Rather Reports on HDNet.
    [Show full text]
  • Education and Interrogation: Comparing Brown and Miranda John H
    Cornell Law Review Volume 90 Article 2 Issue 2 January 2005 Education and Interrogation: Comparing Brown and Miranda John H. Blume Sheri Lynn Johnson Ross Feldmann Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation John H. Blume, Sheri Lynn Johnson, and Ross Feldmann, Education and Interrogation: Comparing Brown and Miranda, 90 Cornell L. Rev. 321 (2005) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol90/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EDUCATION AND INTERROGATION: COMPARING BROWN AND MIRANDA John H. Blume, t Sheri Lynn Johnson,tt Ross Feldmannttt INTRODUCTION ................................................. 321 I. THE WARREN COURT UNDER THE MICROSCOPE: JURISPRUDENTIAL SIMILARITIES OF BROWN AND MIRANDA .. 323 A. Quasi-Legislative Adjudication ...................... 324 B. Stretching the Record: The Use of Social Science and Other Research ................................ 329 II. BROWN AND MIRANDA IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT .......... 332 I1. NOT THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT: WHY BROWN AND MIRANDA BOTH FAILED TO LIVE UP TO THEIR PRO M ISES ............................................... 335 IV. OTHER PARALLEIS ....................................... 341 CONCLUSION ................................................... 344 INTRODUCTION Although the Warren Court had its share of grand decisions, per- haps it should be known instead for its grand goals-particularly the goals of ending America's shameful history of segregation and of pro- viding a broad array of constitutional rights to persons accused of committing crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtwatch PAID PRSRT STD PRSRT Phoenix, AZ U.S
    INSIDE... JULY 2013 n Summer Social Volume 32, Number 7 photos–p. 6 n View Our 100% Club members–p. 8 n News from the www.maricopabar.org court–p. 11 Where The Legal Community Connects NOMinate Now! Secrets of the South Court Tower revealed — Hall of Fame technology and Apple users, take note By Aaron Nash monitors around the courtroom. rooms on this floor have two jury boxes to al- and Member Courtrooms in the SCT were designed with low multiple defendants to be tried to separate The CLE description promised answers victim rooms, where victims can see and hear juries at the same time. of the Year to questions about technology in the state’s the proceedings without being seen and poten- newest, high-tech, $340 million court tow- tially intimidated by those in the public gallery. Compatibility of exhibits and technology Don’t miss this opportunity to In the SCT, the court provides an evi- honor a worthy attorney or judge er. The presenters, Bert Binder and Ken Advance permission to use these rooms is re- Crenshaw, masterfully translated the latest quired, as the judge has to approve the live feed dence cart capable of displaying information in many formats. Be cautioned, however, that by nominating them for the Hall of innovations in courtroom technology into being sent to the rooms. the format of your exhibit (CD, DVD, jump Fame. Also, in an effort to recog- layman’s terms. The first takeaway: Apple The fifth floor of the SCT has the larg- est courtrooms in Superior Court with four drive) might not be compatible with the court’s nize the members who devote an users proceed with caution, as the court’s equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Insider's Guidetoazpolitics
    olitics e to AZ P Insider’s Guid Political lists ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates Statistical Trends The chicken Or the egg? WE’RE EXPERTS AT GETTING POLICY MAKERS TO SEE YOUR SIDE OF THE ISSUE. R&R Partners has a proven track record of using the combined power of lobbying, public relations and advertising experience to change both minds and policy. The political environment is dynamic and it takes a comprehensive approach to reach the right audience at the right time. With more than 50 years of combined experience, we’ve been helping our clients win, regardless of the political landscape. Find out what we can do for you. Call Jim Norton at 602-263-0086 or visit us at www.rrpartners.com. JIM NORTON JEFF GRAY KELSEY LUNDY STUART LUTHER 101 N. FIRST AVE., STE. 2900 Government & Deputy Director Deputy Director Government & Phoenix, AZ 85003 Public Affairs of Client Services of Client Public Affairs Director Development Associate CONTENTS Politics e to AZ ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE Insider’s Guid Political lists STAFF CONTACTS 04 ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE BEATING THE POLITICAL LEGISLATIVE Administration ODDS CONSULTANTS, DISTRICT Vice President & Publisher: ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports Ginger L. Lamb Arizonans show PUBLIC POLICY PROFILES Business Manager: FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates they have ‘the juice’ ADVOCATES,
    [Show full text]
  • Nation's Largest-Ever School Choice Celebration to Kick Off In
    Contact: Andrew Campanella President, National School Choice Week [email protected] or 850-837-0240 Nation’s Largest-Ever School Choice Celebration to Kick Off in Jacksonville Next Week School choice supporters to ring in National School Choice Week 2015 with Official Kickoff at Florida Theatre, January 23, 2015. US Sen. John McCain, Joe Trippi, Rev. HK Matthews, Superstar Athlete Desmond Howard to headline first of 11,000+ events nationwide JACKSONVILLE – The largest celebration of school choice in US history will officially start on Friday, January 23, 2015 at a special event in Jacksonville, Florida. National School Choice Week 2015 will kick off at the Florida Theatre at 12:30 pm on January 23. The event is the first event of an unprecedented 11,082 independently planned and independently funded special events taking place across all 50 states during the Week, which runs until January 31, 2015. The goal of the Week is to shine a positive spotlight on effective education options for children, and to raise awareness of the importance of, and benefits of, school choice in a variety of forms. More than 1,900 students, parents, and teachers will attend the Official Kickoff celebration, which will be nationally televised – on tape delay – on two cable television networks. The event’s speakers include: • US Senator John McCain (R-AZ), a longtime school choice supporter, who will be touring the NFL-YET Academy, a public charter school in Phoenix, and addressing a National School Choice Week event at the school. • Rev. HK Matthews, a noted civil rights pioneer who marched with Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 384 US 436 86 Sct 1602 16 Led2d 694 Ernesto a MIRANDA, Petitioner
    384 US 436 86 SCt 1602 16 LEd2d 694 Ernesto A MIRANDA, Petitioner, v STATE OF ARIZONA Michael VIGNERA, Petitioner, v STATE OF NEW YORK Carl Calvin WESTOVER, Petitioner, v UNITED STATES STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v Roy Allen STEWART Nos 759—761, 584 Argued Feb 28, March 1 and 2, 1966 Decided June 13, 1966 Rehearing Denied No 584 Oct 10, 1966 See 87 SCt 11 No 759: [Syllabus from pages 436-437 intentionally omitted] Page 438 John J Flynn, Phoenix, Ariz, for petitioner Gary K Nelson, Phoenix, Ariz, for respondent Telford Taylor, New York City, for State of New York, as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court (Also in Nos 584, 760, 761 and 762) Duane R Nedrud, for National District Attorneys Ass'n, as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court (Also in Nos 760, 762 and 584) No 760: Victor M Earle, III, New York City, for petitioner William I Siegel, Brooklyn, for respondent No 761: Page 1 of 70 F Conger Fawcett, San Francisco, Cal, for petitioner Sol Gen Thurgood Marshall, for respondent No 584: Gorden Ringer, Los Angeles, Cal, for petitioner William A Norris, Los Angeles, Cal, for respondent [Amicus Curiae intentionally omitted] Page 439 Mr Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court The cases before us raise questions which go to the roots of our concepts of American criminal jurisprudence: the restraints society must observe consistent with the Federal Constitution in prosecuting individuals for crime More specifically, we deal with the admissibility of statements obtained from an individual who is subjected to custodial
    [Show full text]
  • Debating Education
    debating education EASTERN EVIDENCE DEBATE HANDBOOK 1999-2000 NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DEBATE TOPIC PAGE ARGUMENT SECTION GENERAL 2 DEFINITIONS OF POLICY TERMS (NOT TOPICALITY) 5 TOPIC BACKGROUND ON EDUCATION REFORM 7 NEGATIVE VS. CASE 8 NO HARMS OR SIGNIFICANCE 28 NO SOLVENCY 126 NO INHERENCY 129 NEG AGAINST TECH IN SCHOOLS 138 NEGATIVE CASE TURNS 139 FOCUS ON GRADING IS BAD 148 FOCUS ON GOING TO COLLEGE IS BAD 153 BUREAUCRACY BARRIERS TURN CASE 158 SCHOOL REFORM IS COUNTERPRODUCTIVE 163 PRESSURE ON STUDENTS CAUSES HARMFUL STRESS 166 NEGATIVE COUNTERPLANS 167 STATES CP & FEDERALISM DA 194 DESCHOOLING COUNTERPLAN 230 RECONSTITUTION COUNTERPLAN 236 DISADVANTAGES 237 POLICY CHURN 241 DISABLING PROFESSIONS 252 LABELING 262 CURRICULUM TRADE OFF 272 PROPS UP CAPITALISM 282 INFRINGES ON STUDENTS RIGHTS 297 CRITIQUES 298 CRITIQUE OF CREDENTIALISM 308 CRITIQUE OF WORK 325 AFFIRMATIVES 326 AFF HARMS & SIGNIFICANCE GENERAL 340 AFF SOLVENCY GENERAL 345 AFF INHERENCY GENERAL POLICY DEBATE 2000 - EASTERN EVIDENCE HANDBOOK - http://debate.uvm.edu/ee.html 347 CHOICE/VOUCHER AFF 372 SCHOOL UNIFORM AFF 382 FIRST AFFIRMATIVE SPEECHES The diskette version has over 150 pages of evidence not in this handbook. The CD-ROM has the extra evidence, plus a video of a mini-debate for novices, extensive instructional materials, tournament software, and Internet research links. EASTERN EVIDENCE is a non-profit educational program of the Lawrence Debate Union and the University of Vermont. Lawrence Debate Union, 475 Main Street, UVM, Burlington, VT 05405; [email protected], 802-656- 0097 POLICY DEBATE 2000 - EASTERN EVIDENCE HANDBOOK - http://debate.uvm.edu/ee.html DEFINITIONS OF POLICY TERMS DEFINITION OF BEACON SCHOOLS Kelly C.
    [Show full text]
  • Miranda V. Arizona and the Right to Remain Silent
    Five Words That Changed America: Miranda v. Arizona and The Right to Remain Silent Five Words That Changed America: Miranda v. Arizona and The Right to Remain Silent Amos N. Guiora Louisa M. A. Heiny Copyright © 2020 Twelve Tables Press Cover photo source: Arizona State Library, Archives and Public Records, History and Archives Division ISBN: 978-1-946074-30-0 All rights reserved. No part of this work may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner: Twelve Tables Press P.O. Box 568 Northport, New York 11768 www.twelvetablespress.com All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. To Erik, Sabrina, and Linnea. Yes, again. L.M.A.H. To Hagit, Tamar, Amitai, and Yoav. A.N.G. Contents Acknowledgments ...........................................................................................ix Introduction .....................................................................................................xi Reconstructing History .................................................................................xiii Part I: Three Crimes: Phoenix, Arizona 1962–1963 ...................... 1 Chapter 1: The Longest Day .....................................................................3 Chapter 2: Pray for Me .............................................................................9 Chapter 3: A 1953 Four-Door Packard ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cutting Red Tape Overcoming State Bureaucracies to Develop High-Performing State Education Agencies
    Cutting Red Tape Overcoming State Bureaucracies to Develop High-Performing State Education Agencies By Robert Hanna, Jeffrey S. Morrow, and Marci Rozen June 2014 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Cutting Red Tape Overcoming State Bureaucracies to Develop High-Performing State Education Agencies By Robert Hanna, Jeffrey S. Morrow, and Marci Rozen June 2014 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 5 Improving SEA performance: Obstacles and opportunities 5 Skills development 6 Agency reorganization 8 Staff performance evaluation 9 Talent recruitment 10 Employee compensation 13 Other challenges to improving SEA performance 13 Federal regulations 14 State politics 15 Organizational culture 17 Recommendations 19 Conclusion 21 About the authors 22 Acknowledgements 23 Endnotes Introduction and summary States serve a special role in our public education system. Through elected leg- islatures, states have endowed their various state departments of education with powers over public education, which include granting authority to local entities— typically school districts—to run schools. In their oversight capacity, states— traditionally through state education agencies, or SEAs—monitor districts and schools to ensure that students are safe in school and that their education meets minimum quality standards. But such standards are typically not explained with any specificity. Inspired by a national movement to provide equitable opportuni- ties to all children, states also collect and redistribute dollars intended to reduce local funding disparities. Moreover, many policymakers—particularly federal policymakers—and advocates have asked states to drive large-scale educational improvement through federal programs, including No Child Left Behind waivers, Race to the Top initiatives, or the No Child Left Behind, or NCLB, Title I School Improvement Grant program.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Arizona History Index, F
    Index to the Journal of Arizona History, F Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 NOTE: the index includes two citation formats. The format for Volumes 1-5 is: volume (issue): page number(s) The format for Volumes 6 -54 is: volume: page number(s) F Faber, Jerdie (Indian school teacher) 6:131 Fabila, Alfonso, cited 8:131 “The Fabulous Sierra Bonita,” by Earle R. Forrest 6:132-146 “The Face of Early Phoenix,” compiled by A. Tracy Row 13:109-122 Faces of the Borderlands, reviewed 18:234-35 Facts About the Papago Indian Reservation and the Papago People, reviewed 13:295-97 Fagan, Mike, of Harshaw 6:33 Fagen, Ken, photo of 50:218 Fagerberg, Dixon, Jr., book by, reviewed 24:207-8 Fagerberg, John E. 39:163 Fages, Pedro 13:124, 126-29; 44:50, 51, 71 n. 28 biography of 9:223-44 cited 7:62 diary of 9:225-44 diary of, listed 27:145 1 Index to the Journal of Arizona History, F Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 Fahlen, F. T. 14:55-56 Fahlman, Betsy, book by, reviewed 44:95-96; 51:381-83 book reviewed by 42:239-41; 47:316-17; 51:185-86 books reviewed by 49:293-94 Fain, Granville (Dan) 19:261-62, 264, 271 Fain, Norman W. 19:264, 266; 43:364, 366 Fair, Captain (at Santa Cruz in 1849) 28:108 Fair, James G. 34:139-40 Fair Laughs the Morn, by Genevieve Gray, reviewed 36:105 Fair Price Commission 46:158 Fair, (senator of Nevada) IV(1)37 Fair Truckle (horse) 47:17 Fairbank, Arizona 7:9; 8:164, 166, 168; 37:7, 24 n.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 & Ggovernanceovernance Program on Education Policy & Governance
    HARVARD UNIVERSITY Program on Annual Report EducationEducation PPolicyolicy 2005 & GovernanceGovernance Program on Education Policy & Governance Director: Paul E. Peterson, Henry Lee Shattuck Professor of Government, Harvard University Deputy Director: William Howell, Associate Professor of Government, Harvard University Advisory Committee: Bruce Kovner, Chair, Caxton Corporation Cory Booker, Booker, Rabinowitz Bob Boruch, University of Pennsylvania John Brandl, University of Minnesota Peter Flanigan, UBS AG Investor Relations C. Boyden Gray, Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering Phil Handy, Florida Board of Education Roger Hertog, Alliance Capital Management Gisele Huff, Jaquelin Hume Foundation Lisa Graham Keegan, The Keegan Company Deborah McGriff, Edison Schools Terry Moe, Hoover Institution and the Department of Political Science, Stanford University Lawrence Patrick III, Black Alliance for Educational Options Jerry Rappaport, J. L. Rappaport Charitable Foundation Faculty Affiliates: Caroline Minter Hoxby, Professor of Economics, Harvard University Brian Jacob, Assistant Professor of Public Policy, Harvard University Christopher Jencks, Professor of Social Policy, Harvard University Richard Light, Professor of Education, Harvard University Donald Rubin, Professor of Statistics, Harvard University Staff: Antonio Wendland, Associate Director Rajashri Chakrabarti, Postdoctoral Fellow Martin R. West, Program Fellow Carol Peterson, Managing Editor, Education next Mark Linnen, Staff Assistant Research Affiliates: Christopher Berry, Assistant Professor,
    [Show full text]
  • The Distributor Orange County Model a Ford Club Model a Ford Club of America Chartered August 1961 – Santa Ana, California
    The Distributor Orange County Model A Ford Club Model A Ford Club of America Chartered August 1961 – Santa Ana, California Editors: Peter & Ana Hyland May 2010 Volume 50 Number 5 Email to: [email protected] Website: http://www.ocmafc.org PANCAKE BREAKFAST April 25, 2010 I would like to thank each and everyone 2010 BOARD MEMBERS Notes From Your President who helped out that Sunday morning. President—Mark Schwing That list would have to be at least 96 714-970-1696 [email protected] Mark Schwing. names long. Again thanks to all. You are VP/Activities–TBD the heart and soul of OCMAFC. The Secretary– Tissy Hatcher compliments I received from several of 714-431-1119 May 2010 [email protected] the national board members are really Treasurer –Joe Goff 949-768-4627 President's Letter compliments to you for the great event. [email protected] Technical–Gerald O’Brien th (With two co-directors-see below) Our 49 Annual Pancake Breakfast Our breakfast revenue was down slightly 714-777-0771 th from 2009 but if the silent auction for the [email protected] held on April 25 was another Editors – Peter & Ana Hyland outstanding success. We served 929 donated transmission and bell housing 714-633-5797 had opened, we would have exceed the [email protected] adult and 62 child breakfasts. The Immediate Past President adult count was down by 68 but the 2009 figure. I’ll present some detailed Don Miller 562-431-6494 numbers at the May meeting [email protected] child count was up by 5.
    [Show full text]