DOCSLIB.ORG

Incorporating Ground Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblage Data and Earthworm Bioassays in the Ecological Risk Assessment of a Trap and Skeet Shooting Range

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Incorporating Ground Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblage Data and Earthworm Bioassays in the Ecological Risk Assessment of a Trap and Skeet Shooting Range Incorporating Ground Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblage Data and Earthworm Bioassays in the Ecological Risk Assessment of a Trap and Skeet Shooting Range THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Joshua Lee Bryant Graduate Program in Entomology The Ohio State University 2010 Master's Examination Committee: Roman Lanno “Advisor” David Horn Richard Bradley Copyright by Joshua Lee Bryant 2010 Abstract Ecological risk assessment is an important tool for evaluating potentially hazardous contaminants on a site-specific basis. Few methods exist for evaluating population and community level effects of contaminants on terrestrial invertebrates, though such assessments may aid in site evaluation and subsequent decision-making with regard to site remediation. A particularly promising group of invertebrates for terrestrial site-based risk assessment is ground beetles (Carabidae) due to their high diversity in most terrestrial ecosystems. Ground beetles have also been shown to be important indicators of physical disturbances in their habitats. In the current study, we investigated the utility of ground beetles as indicators of elevated metal concentrations originating from lead-based shot in a trap and skeet shooting range. Concentration of the metals lead (Pb), arsenic (As), and antimony (Sb) were 3668, 46, and 0.28mg/kg in the shotfall and 537, 22, and 0.15mg/kg in the reference site, respectively. Ground beetles were collected in 2008 and 2009 using pitfall traps placed in the shotfall region of the shooting range and an adjacent reference site. Overall, ground beetle species richness did not differ between sites. Abundance of the most common species was either not significantly different between sites or they were more abundant in the reference site. A total of 45 species was collected in the two sites over both years. In addition to the ground beetle data, bioassays using the earthworm Eisenia andrei were used to determine bioavailability and sub-lethal effects of the metals in the shooting range. Bioavailability of Sb, As, and Pb was greater in the ii shotfall soil compared to the reference soil. There was no mortality in any of the test soils during the 28-day toxicity test. Earthworm cocoon production was reduced in shotfall soil relative to the soil from the reference area and Webster, a lab standard soil. Although earthworm data suggests that there are sub-lethal reproductive effects from exposure to shotfall associated metals, ground beetle diversity appeared to be robust to these environmental changes. Additional years of sampling may reveal additional trends in ground beetle distribution and abundance. iii Dedication This document is dedicated to my family iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Roman P. Lanno, for his support and assistance in the development of this project. I also would like to thank my fellow lab mates, David Sovic, Shuo Yu, Meaghan Sutherland, and Chris Hurdzan, for their input and guidance during various parts of my project. I would like to thank the following friends and colleagues for helping me either set up traps or collect samples; Erin Morris, Kaitlin Uppstrom, Allison Byrnes, and George Keeney. I would also like to thank my committee members David Horn and Richard Bradley for their guidance and input in this project. I wish to thank Foster Purrington for confirming my carabid identifications and teaching many tricks for discerning closely related species. v Vita January 28, 1985.......................................... Born, Chillicothe, Ohio, USA 2003 ............................................................ Piketon High School 2007 ............................................................ B.S. Biology, The Ohio State University 2008 to 2009 ................................................ Robert H. Edgerley Ecotoxicology Fellow 2007 to present ............................................ Graduate Teaching Associate, Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University Fields of Study Major Field: Entomology vi Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................... ii Dedication .............................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................v Vita ........................................................................................................................ vi Fields of Study ....................................................................................................... vi Table of Contents .................................................................................................. vii List of Tables ......................................................................................................... xi List of Figures ....................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1: Introduction and Literature Review .........................................................1 1.1 Ground beetles ....................................................................................................1 1.2 Pitfall traps .........................................................................................................2 1.3 Biological Indicators ...........................................................................................3 1.4 Effects of heavy metals on arthropods .................................................................5 1.5 Bioavailability ................................................................................................. 11 1.6 Bioavailability and distribution of metals in shooting ranges ............................. 13 1.7 Studies of soil arthropod communities in shooting ranges ................................. 15 vii 1.8 Scope of the current study ................................................................................ 16 1.9 Hypotheses ....................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 2: Diversity of Ground Beetle assemblages of a shooting range and adjacent reference area ......................................................................................................... 18 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................ 18 2.2.1Study site ........................................................................................................ 18 2.2.2 2008 Field Season .......................................................................................... 20 2.2.3 2009 Field Season .......................................................................................... 20 2.2.4 Sample processing and identification ............................................................. 22 2.2.5 Data analysis .................................................................................................. 23 2.3 Results .............................................................................................................. 24 2.3.1 2008 field season ........................................................................................... 24 2.3.2 2009 field season ........................................................................................... 24 2.3.3 Ground beetle activity over time .................................................................... 26 2.3.4 Species abundance patterns, richness, and evenness ....................................... 28 2.3.5 Site preference ............................................................................................... 30 2.2.6 Trap disturbance ............................................................................................ 31 2.3 Discussion ........................................................................................................ 32 viii Chapter 3: Bioavailability and sublethal effects of shotfall associated metals .......... 38 to Eisenia andrei .................................................................................................... 38 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 38 3.2 Methods ............................................................................................................ 38 3.2.1 Preparation of soils ........................................................................................ 38 3.2.2 Test organisms ............................................................................................... 39 3.2.3 Bioaccumulation Assay.................................................................................. 39 3.2.4 Reproduction Bioassay .................................................................................. 40 3.2.5 Bioaccumulation factor .................................................................................. 41 3.2.6 Analysis of metals in E. andrei tissues and test soils ...................................... 41 3.2.7 Data analysis .................................................................................................. 42 3.3 Results .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E
    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water
    [Show full text]
  • Anisodactylus Binotatus Fabr., a Carabid Beetle New to New Zealand, and a Review of the Exotic Carabid Fauna
    Pacific Insects 5 (4) : 837-847 December 30, 1963 ANISODACTYLUS BINOTATUS FABR., A CARABID BEETLE NEW TO NEW ZEALAND, AND A REVIEW OF THE EXOTIC CARABID FAUNA By R. L. C. Pilgrim DEPT, OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY, NEW ZEALAND Abstract: Anisodactylus binotatus Fabr. 1787 (Col.: Carabidae), an introduced species now established in Canterbury (South Island), New Zealand, is reported for the first time. The literature respecting other carabids sometimes recorded as introduced is reviewed; Ago- nochila binotata (White, 1846), Agonum submetallicum (White, 1846), Hypharpax australasiae (Dejean, 1829) and Pentagonica vittipennis Chaudoir, 1877 are shown to be better considered as endemic to the Australia - New Zealand area. Other species are classed as either native to New Zealand, clearly introduced though not all established, or of doubtful occurrence in New Zealand. Introduction: The Carabidae of New Zealand are predominantly endemic species, but a small number of exotic species has been recorded. This paper reports a further introduc­ tion to the carabid fauna of this country and concludes with a survey of recorded exotic Carabidae in New Zealand. Specimens of the newly-recorded species were collected in domestic gardens in Christ­ church, and were included in a collection sent for identification to Dr. E. B. Britton, British Museum (Nat. Hist.), who kindly drew the writer's attention to the fact that they were so far unreported from New Zealand. Description of adult (from New Zealand specimens) Fig. 1. Anisodactylus binotatus Fabricius, 1787 Color: Head, pronotum, elytra and femora black; tibiae and tarsi light brown to red- black ; palps and antennal segments 1-2 brown, remainder of antennae black; leg spines red-brown; head with small red spot on frons between eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • Sterbeeckia 36 (2020)
    STERBEECKIA 36 (2020) FRANS VAN STERBEECK 1630 – 1693 Koninklijke Vlaamse Mycologische Vereniging v.z.w. 1 STERBEECKIA ISSN 0562-0066 Sterbeeckia is een uitgave van de Koninklijke Vlaamse Mycologische Vereniging v.z.w., genoemd naar de Antwerpse pionier-mycoloog Franciscus van Sterbeeck (1630-1693), met wetenschappelijk-mycologische artikels, in het bijzonder betreffende de Belgische fungi. Leden van de KVMV ontvangen Sterbeeckia en het trimestrieel contactblad Sporen. Het lidgeld bedraagt 23,00 € (inclusief inwonende gezinsleden) te storten op rekening IBAN: BE17 7370 1875 7621 (BIC: KREDBEBB, mededeling Lidgeld KVMV en jaartal) van de Koninklijke Vlaamse Mycologische Vereniging vzw, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerpen. Voor leden buiten Europa bedraagt het lidgeld 30,00 €. De eventuele bankkosten worden gedragen door de opdrachtgever. Nummers van oudere jaargangen kunnen aangevraagd worden bij Judith De Keyser, Vaartstraat 102, B-2845 Niel, [email protected] Kopij is altijd welkom en kan bezorgd worden aan André De Kesel ([email protected]) Sterbeeckia is a mycological journal dedicated to Franciscus van Sterbeeck (1630-1693), a pioneer mycologist from Antwerp (Flanders, Belgium). Sterbeeckia publishes papers on all aspects of Belgian fungi. The journal is published by the Royal Flemish Mycological Society (Koninklijke Vlaamse Mycologische Vereniging, KVMV). Members receive the journal Sterbeeckia once per year and Sporen, a newsletter published 4 times a year. Membership fee for members outside Europe is 30,00
    [Show full text]
  • Flanged Bombardier Beetles from Laos (Carabidae, Paussinae)
    Entomologica Basiliensia et Collectionis Frey 31 101–113 2009 ISSN 1661–8041 Flanged Bombardier Beetles from Laos (Carabidae, Paussinae) by Peter Nagel Abstract. The Paussinae of Laos were recently studied based on new material collected by the Natural History Museum Basel. Two species are described as being new to science, Lebioderus brancuccii sp.nov., and Paussus lanxangensis sp.nov., and two species are new records for Laos. All species are shown in drawings. To date nine species are known from Laos, four of which have been added by the NHMB collecting trips, and a fifth new record is based on other museum collections. Key words. Laos – Paussinae – Lebioderus – Paussus – taxonomy– new species – myrmecophiles – distribution records Introduction Within the Oriental Region, Indochina is less well explored concerning the insect fauna than the Indian Subcontinent. Within Indochina, Laos is the least explored country, especially when compared to the insect fauna of the adjacent regions of Thailand. In contrast to neighboring countries, Laos still harbour large areas of forest, with relatively little disturbance and the presence of pristine habitats. However, demographic increases combined with forest burning, clearing for cultivation, and logging are major current threats to the Laotian environment. Therefore there are strong concerns for the survival of the high and unique biodiversity of this country which is situated in the centre of the Indo-Burma Hotspot (MITTERMEIER et al. 2004). In order to contribute to the documentation of the Laotian insect fauna as a basis for furthering our understanding and consequentially the conservation efforts, Dr. Michel Brancucci, Natural History Museum Basel, has conducted collecting trips to Laos in 2003, 2004, 2007 and 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera, Carabidae) 517 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.100.1543 Research Article Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 100: 517–532What (2011)do we know about winter active ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) 517 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.100.1543 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research What do we know about winter active ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Central and Northern Europe? Radomir Jaskuła, Agnieszka Soszyńska-Maj Department of Invertebrate Zoology & Hydrobiology, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland Corresponding authors: Radomir Jaskuła ([email protected]), Agnieszka Soszyńska-Maj ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Noordijk | Received 26 November 2009 | Accepted 8 April 2010 | Published 20 May 2011 Citation: Jaskuła R, Soszyńska-Maj A (2011) What do we know about winter active ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Central and Northern Europe? In: Kotze DJ, Assmann T, Noordijk J, Turin H, Vermeulen R (Eds) Carabid Beetles as Bioindicators: Biogeographical, Ecological and Environmental Studies. ZooKeys 100: 517–532. doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.100.1543 Abstract This paper summarizes the current knowledge on winter active Carabidae in Central and Northern Eu- rope. In total 73 winter active species are listed, based on literature and own observations. Ground beetles are among the three most numerous Coleoptera families active during the autumn to spring period. The winter community of Carabidae is composed both of larvae (mainly autumn breeding species) and adults, as well as of epigeic species and those inhabiting tree trunks. Supranivean fauna is characterized by lower species diversity than the subnivean fauna. The activity of ground beetles decreases in late autumn, is lowest during mid-winter and increases in early spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia County Ground Beetle Species (There May Be Some Dutchess County Floodplain Forest Records Still Included)
    Columbia County Ground Beetle Species (There may be some Dutchess County floodplain forest records still included). Anisodactylus nigerrimus Amara aenea Apristus latens Acupalpus canadensis Amara angustata Apristus subsulcatus Acupalpus partiarius Amara angustatoides Asaphidion curtum Acupalpus pauperculus Amara apricaria Badister neopulchellus Acupalpus pumilus Amara avida Badister notatus Acupalpus rectangulus Amara chalcea Badister ocularis Agonum aeruginosum Amara communis Badister transversus Agonum affine Amara crassispina Bembidion Agonum canadense Amara cupreolata Bembidion aenulum Agonum corvus Amara exarata Bembidion affine Agonum cupripenne Amara familiaris Bembidion antiquum Agonum errans Amara flebilis Bembidion basicorne Agonum extensicolle Amara lunicollis Bembidion carolinense Agonum ferreum Amara neoscotica Bembidion castor Agonum fidele Amara otiosa Bembidion chalceum Agonum galvestonicum Amara ovata Bembidion cheyennense Agonum gratiosum Amara pennsylvanica Bembidion frontale Agonum harrisii Amara rubrica Bembidion immaturum Agonum lutulentum Amara sp Bembidion impotens Agonum melanarium Amphasia interstitialis Bembidion inaequale Agonum metallescens Anatrichis minuta Bembidion incrematum Agonum moerens Anisodactylus discoideus Bembidion inequale Agonum muelleri Anisodactylus harrisii Bembidion lacunarium Agonum mutatum Anisodactylus kirbyi Bembidion levetei Agonum palustre Anisodactylus nigrita Bembidion louisella Agonum picicornoides Anisodactylus pseudagricola Bembidion mimus Agonum propinquum Anisodactylus rusticus
    [Show full text]
  • LBB 0048 2 1255-1294.Pdf
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Linzer biologische Beiträge Jahr/Year: 2016 Band/Volume: 0048_2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Jaeger Bernd, Kataev Boris M., Wrase David W. Artikel/Article: New synonyms, and first and interesting records of certain species of the subtribe Stenolophina from the Palaearctic, Oriental and Afrotropical regions (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Harpalini, Stenolophina) 1255-1294 download www.zobodat.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 48/2 1255-1294 19.12.2016 New synonyms, and first and interesting records of certain species of the subtribe Stenolophina from the Palaearctic, Oriental and Afrotropical regions (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Harpalini, Stenolophina) Bernd JAEGER, Boris M. KATAEV & David W. WRASE Abstract: Anthracus descarpentriesi JEANNEL, 1948 is considered a junior synonym of Anthracus angusticollis (PÉRINGUEY, 1908), Dicheirotrichus punicus aegyptiacus SCHATZMAYR, 1936 is treated as a junior synonym of Dicheirotrichus (Pelagophilus) punicus BEDEL, 1899, and Stenolophus narentinus J. MÜLLER, 1916 [previously the authorship of Stenolophus narentinus was erroneously attributed to DROVENIK & PEKS (1999)] is considered a junior synonym of Stenolophus (Stenolophus) proximus DEJEAN, 1829. For Psychristus (Psychristus) dentatus JAEGER, 2009 male characters are described and figured for the first time. First or additional distribution data are provided for: Acupalpus (Acupalpus) exiguus DEJEAN, 1929: first record for the Turkish province of Kars. Acupalpus (Acupalpus) flavicollis (STURM, 1825): first record for Albania. Acupalpus (Acupalpus) laferi KATAEV & JAEGER, 1997: first records for the Chinese provinces of Gansu and Heilongjiang. Acupalpus (Acupalpus) maculatus (SCHAUM, 1960): first record for Tadzhikistan. Acupalpus (Acupalpus) planicollis (SCHAUM, 1857): first detailed record for Italy, Triest, additional records for Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Pitfall Trap Preservative on Collections of Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 40 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 Numbers 3 & Article 6 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 October 2007 Effects of Pitfall Trap Preservative on Collections of Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Kenneth W. McCravy Western Illinois University Jason E. Willand U.S. Geological Survey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation McCravy, Kenneth W. and Willand, Jason E. 2007. "Effects of Pitfall Trap Preservative on Collections of Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 40 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol40/iss2/6 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. McCravy and Willand: Effects of Pitfall Trap Preservative on Collections of Carabid Be 15 4 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 40, Nos. 3 & 4 EFFECTS OF PITFALL TRAP PRESERVATIVE ON COLLECTIONS OF CARABID BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) Kenneth W. McCravy1 and Jason E. Willand2 ABSTRACT Effects of six pitfall trap preservatives (5% acetic acid solution, distilled water, 70% ethanol, 50% ethylene glycol solution, 50% propylene glycol solution, and 10% saline solution) on collections of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) were studied in a west-central Illinois deciduous forest from May to October 2005. A total of 819 carabids, representing 33 species and 19 genera, were collected. Saline produced significantly fewer captures than did acetic acid, ethanol, eth- ylene glycol, and propylene glycol, while distilled water produced significantly fewer captures than did acetic acid.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Beetle Assemblages on Illinois Algific Slopes: a Rare Habitat Threatened by Climate Change
    Ground Beetle assemblages on Illinois algific slopes: a rare habitat threatened by climate change by: Steven J. Taylor, Ph.D. Alan D. Yanahan Illinois Natural History Survey Department of Entomology University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 320 Morrill Hall 1816 South Oak Street University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Champaign, IL 61820 505 S. Goodwin Ave [email protected] Urbana, IL 61801 report submitted to: Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Resource Conservation, Federal Aid / Special Funds Section One Natural Resources Way Springfield, Illinois 62702-1271 Fund Title: 375 IDNR 12-016W I INHS Technical Report 2013 (01) 5 January 2013 Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign William Shilts, Executive Director Illinois Natural History Survey Brian D. Anderson, Director 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 217-333-6830 Ground Beetle assemblages on Illinois algific slopes: a rare habitat threatened by climate change Steven J. Taylor & Alan D. Yanahan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign During the Pleistocene, glacial advances left a small gap in the northwestern corner of Illinois, southwestern Wisconsin, and northeastern Iowa, which were never covered by the advancing Pleistocene glaciers (Taylor et al. 2009, p. 8, fig. 2.2). This is the Driftless Area – and it is one of Illinois’ most unique natural regions, comprising little more than 1% of the state. Illinois’ Driftless Area harbors more than 30 threatened or endangered plant species, and several unique habitat types. Among these habitats are talus, or scree, slopes, some of which retain ice throughout the year. The talus slopes that retain ice through the summer, and thus form a habitat which rarely exceeds 50 °F, even when the surrounding air temperature is in the 90’s °F, are known as “algific slopes.” While there are numerous examples of algific slopes in Iowa and Wisconsin, this habitat is very rare in Illinois (fewer than ten truly algific sites are known in the state).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of Omnivory and Alternative Food Resources on the Strength of Trophic Cascades
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: CONSEQUENCES OF OMNIVORY AND ALTERNATIVE FOOD RESOURCES ON THE STRENGTH OF TROPHIC CASCADES Steven D. Frank, Doctor of Philosophy, 2007 Directed By: Associate Professor Paula M. Shrewsbury Department of Entomology & Professor Robert F. Denno Department of Entomology Omnivorous predators that feed on prey and plant resources are recognized as an important component of food webs but their impact on herbivore populations and trophic dynamics is unpredictable. Feeding on food items from multiple trophic levels increases the reticulate nature of food webs and the labile role of omnivores in promoting trophic cascades. Using carabid beetles in a corn agroecosystem, this research explored the interactive effects of predator guild (omnivore or carnivore) and the trophic origin of alternative food resources (seeds or fly pupae) on the control of herbivores (black cutworms) and plant survival. I demonstrated that the trophic guild and feeding performance of carabids can be predicted from their mandibular morphology. Carnivorous carabids, using mandibles with sharp points and a long shearing edge, kill and consume caterpillars more efficiently than omnivores that have mandibles with wide molar areas adapted for consuming prey and seeds. Omnivore preference for seeds and pupae further reduced their consumption of cutworms, which resulted in increased plant damage, ultimately dampening trophic cascades. In open field plots the abundance of omnivorous carabids and ants increased in response to seed but not pupae whereas neither subsidy affected the abundance of carnivorous predators. Pupae subsidies reduced predation of cutworms by carnivores and omnivores, consequently reducing seedling survival. However, in seed subsidized plots omnivorous predators switched from seeds to higher quality cutworm prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Diversity
    VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AS INDICATORS OF GROUND BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) DIVERSITY BY ALAN D. YANAHAN THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2013 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Dr. Steven J. Taylor, Chair, Director of Research Adjunct Assistant Professor Sam W. Heads Associate Professor Andrew V. Suarez ABSTRACT Formally assessing biodiversity can be a daunting if not impossible task. Subsequently, specific taxa are often chosen as indicators of patterns of diversity as a whole. Mapping the locations of indicator taxa can inform conservation planning by identifying land units for management strategies. For this approach to be successful, though, land units must be effective spatial representations of the species assemblages present on the landscape. In this study, I determined whether land units classified by vegetative communities predicted the community structure of a diverse group of invertebrates—the ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Specifically, that (1) land units of the same classification contained similar carabid species assemblages and that (2) differences in species structure were correlated with variation in land unit characteristics, including canopy and ground cover, vegetation structure, tree density, leaf litter depth, and soil moisture. The study site, the Braidwood Dunes and Savanna Nature Preserve in Will County, Illinois is a mosaic of differing land units. Beetles were sampled continuously via pitfall trapping across an entire active season from 2011–2012. Land unit characteristics were measured in July 2012. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordinated the land units by their carabid assemblages into five ecologically meaningful clusters: disturbed, marsh, prairie, restoration, and savanna.
    [Show full text]