DOCSLIB.ORG

Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Winning in a Landslide by J.M. Cartwright Opposition Party Wins Landslide Election in Turks and Caicos Islands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Winning in a Landslide by J.M. Cartwright Opposition Party Wins Landslide Election in Turks and Caicos Islands Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Winning in a Landslide by J.M. Cartwright Opposition party wins landslide election in Turks and Caicos Islands. Businessman Charles Washington Misick led the Progressive National Party (PNP) to a landslide 14 to 1 victory over the incumbent People's Democratic Movement (PDM) in the Turks and Caicos Islands general elections on Friday, February 19th, 2021. Supervisor of Elections Dudley Lewis confirmed on Saturday January 20th that the PNP won 9 of the 10 electoral district seats and all 5 of the At Large seats. PDM leader Sharlene Cartwright-Robinson, who was elected the country's first female premier in 2016, lost her seat. Former health minister Edwin Astwood who won the Grand Turk South seat was the only successful PDM candidate. The 70-year-old Misick is a former chief minister and brother of former premier Michael Misick. During a pre-Election Day virtual rally on the night of Thursday, February 18th, Misick said "every survey in the last two weeks points to a PNP victory". He told viewers he will be sworn in as the next premier on Monday, then on Tuesday he will submit the names of Cabinet ministers to Governor Nigel Dakin and have a "fully-functioning" PNP government by Wednesday. "I can feel victory in my bones! I can appreciate, and I am thankful, for the confidence that I see that you the people of TCI are willing to place in my leadership and the PNP," Misick said. "We are about to witness the end of an ineffective government whose meandering has left you demoralized, but take courage because you have a reason now to hope and that hope is because of the vote that you will mark for the Progressive National Party (PNP)," he said, adding that Monday, February 22nd, 2021 will be a "red letter day" for the Turks and Caicos Islands. It will be the day in the life of a new government, a new PNP and this new PNP government will bring new hope to our people." The PNP leader continued: "You've heard us for the last couple of months. We've invested a lot of time i putting together a winning team, a performing team. The PDM has out maneuvered themselves, they've overstayed their welcome and betrayed your trust and now it is time for them to be paid back. I want you to go to the polls and with coldness and boldness, vote the PDM into oblivion. We come for this work. We know the work is difficult, but I promise you we are prepared. We come for this work to ensure that none of you are left behind. We plan to turbo-charge this economy to ensure that jobs are created." Report: Rupert Murdoch predicts Biden landslide. President Trump’s influential supporter Rupert Murdoch is telling close associates he believes Joe Biden will win the election in a landslide. The Australian-born billionaire is disgusted by Trump’s handling of COVID-19, remarking that the president is his own worst enemy, that he is not listening to advice about how best to handle the pandemic, and that he’s creating a never-ending crisis for his administration, according to three people who have spoken with Murdoch. In response to an email inquiry for this report asking him if he believes Biden will win in a landslide and his thoughts on Trump’s handling of coronavirus, Murdoch responded, “No comment except I’ve never called Trump an idiot,” referring to a 2018 report that the media mogul called the president a “fucking idiot” following a chat about immigration. While Murdoch believes the outcome of the election is a fait accompli, his New York tabloid has been doing everything in its power to help Trump’s re-election chances, publishing a screaming page 1 story on Wednesday under the headline, “Biden Secret E-Mails.” The supposed “smoking gun” emails purported to show that Hunter Biden had introduced his father to a Ukrainian businessman when he was vice president, though the Post relied on unverified documents given to them by Trump’s attorney Rudy Giuliani. (Biden’s team denies that such a meeting took place.) Fox Owner Rupert Murdoch Thinks Biden Will Win in a Landslide. Australian billionaire Rupert Murdoch has long been a supporter of American Republican politics. Murdoch not only Fox News, but also the New York Post and the Wall St. Journal. All 3 news outlets lean to the right and have ardently backed Donald Trump’s presidency. US President Donald Trump (L) is embraced by Rupert Murdoch, Executive Chairman of News Corp, during a dinner to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the Battle of the Coral Sea during WWII onboard the Intrepid Sea, Air and Space Museum May 4, 2017 in New York, New York. / AFP PHOTO / Brendan Smialowski (Photo credit should read BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images) But Murdoch did not become a powerful business magnate by not seeing which way the wind was blowing. And he doesn’t have high hopes in Donald Trump’s 2020 chances. According to the Daily Beast, Murdoch is telling people that he expects Joe Biden to win in a landslide. Lachlan Cartwright reports, “The Australian-born billionaire is disgusted by Trump’s handling of COVID-19, remarking that the president is his own worst enemy, that he is not listening to advice about how best to handle the pandemic, and that he’s creating a never-ending crisis for his administration.” The Daily Beast also reports that Murdoch has been so unhappy with Trump that he considered backing Mike Bloomberg’s 2020 unsuccessful 2020 presidential bid. The billionaire also reportedly told one associate, “after all that has gone on, people are ready for Sleepy Joe.” What A Clinton Landslide Would Look Like. We’re going to spend a lot of time over the next 87 days contemplating the possibility of a Donald Trump presidency. Trump is a significant underdog — he has a 13 percent chance of winning the election according to our polls-only model and a 23 percent chance according to polls- plus. But those probabilities aren’t that small. For comparison, you have a 17 percent chance of losing a “game” of Russian roulette. But there’s another possibility staring us right in the face: A potential Hillary Clinton landslide. Our polls-only model projects Clinton to win the election by 7.7 percentage points, about the same margin by which Barack Obama beat John McCain in 2008. And it assigns a 35 percent chance to Clinton winning by double digits. Our other model, polls-plus, is much more conservative about Clinton’s prospects. If this were an ordinary election, the smart money would be on the race tightening down the stretch run, and coming more into line with economic “fundamentals” that suggest the election ought to be close. Since this is how the polls-plus model “thinks,” it projects Clinton to win by around 4 points, about the margin by which Obama beat Mitt Romney in 2012 — a solid victory but a long way from a landslide. But the theory behind “fundamentals” models is that economic conditions prevail because most other factors are fought to a draw. In a normal presidential election, both candidates raise essentially unlimited money and staff their campaigns with hundreds of experienced professionals. In a normal presidential election, both candidates are good representatives of their party’s traditional values and therefore unite almost all their party’s voters behind them. In a normal presidential election, both candidates have years of experience running for office and deftly pivot away from controversies to exploit their opponents’ weaknesses. In a normal presidential election, both candidates target a broad enough range of demographic groups to have a viable chance of reaching 51 percent of the vote. This may not be a normal presidential election because while most of those things are true for Clinton, it’s not clear that any of them apply to Trump. A related theory is that contemporary presidential elections are bound to be relatively close because both parties have high floors on their support. Indeed, we’ve gone seven straight elections without a double-digit popular vote victory (the last one was Ronald Reagan’s in 1984), the longest such streak since 1876-1900. As with other theories of this kind, however, there’s the risk of mistaking what’s happened in the recent past for some sort of iron law of politics. Historically, the U.S. has ebbed and flowed between periods of close presidential elections — such in the late 19th century or early 21st century — and eras in which there were plenty of lopsided ones (every election in the 1920s and 1930s was a blowout). These patterns seem to have some relationship with partisanship, with highly partisan epochs tending to produce close elections by guaranteeing each party its fair share of support. Trump’s nomination, however, reflects profound disarray within the Republican Party. Furthermore, about 30 percent of Republican or Republican-leaning voters have an unfavorable view of Trump. How many of them will vote for Clinton is hard to say, but parties facing this much internal strife, such as Republicans in 1964 or Democrats in 1972 or 1980, have often suffered landslide losses. Perhaps the strongest evidence for a potential landslide against Trump is in the state-by-state polling, which has shown him underperforming in any number of traditionally Republican states. It’s not just Georgia and Arizona, where polls have shown a fairly close race all year. At various points, polls have shown Clinton drawing within a few percentage points of Trump — and occasionally even leading him — in states such as Utah, South Carolina, Texas, Alaska, Kansas and even Mississippi.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • House of Lords Official Report
    Vol. 712 Thursday No. 101 2 July 2009 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDER OF BUSINESS Royal Assent Questions Energy Performance Certificates Disabled People: UN Convention EU: Financial Institutions Comprehensive Spending Review Parliamentary Standards Bill First Reading Five Statutory Instruments Motions to Refer to Grand Committee Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill Committee (4th Day) Swine Flu Statement Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 (Violent Offender Orders) (Notification Requirements) Regulations 2009 Motion to Approve Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 (Foreign Travel Notification Requirements) Regulations 2009 Motion to Approve Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill Committee (4th Day) (Continued) Grand Committee Welfare Reform Bill Committee (8th Day) Written Statements Written Answers For column numbers see back page £3·50 Lords wishing to be supplied with these Daily Reports should give notice to this effect to the Printed Paper Office. The bound volumes also will be sent to those Peers who similarly notify their wish to receive them. No proofs of Daily Reports are provided. Corrections for the bound volume which Lords wish to suggest to the report of their speeches should be clearly indicated in a copy of the Daily Report, which, with the column numbers concerned shown on the front cover, should be sent to the Editor of Debates, House of Lords, within 14 days of the date of the Daily Report. This issue of the Official Report is also available on the Internet at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200809/ldhansrd/index/090702.html PRICES AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES DAILY PARTS Single copies: Commons, £5; Lords £3·50 Annual subscriptions: Commons, £865; Lords £525 WEEKLY HANSARD Single copies: Commons, £12; Lords £6 Annual subscriptions: Commons, £440; Lords £255 Index—Single copies: Commons, £6·80—published every three weeks Annual subscriptions: Commons, £125; Lords, £65.
    [Show full text]
  • The Turks and Caicos Islands
    The Turks and Caicos Islands Standard Note: SN/IA/5038 Last updated: 11 April 2012 Author: Jon Lunn and Gavin Thompson Section International Affairs and Defence Section; Economic Policy and Statistics Section This note briefly reviews the crisis of political and economic governance which has affected the Turks and Caicos Islands since 2008, leading to the imposition of direct rule, the launching of anti-corruption investigations and, with the economy experiencing serious problems, the exceptional introduction by the British Government of a rescue package in the form of a loan guarantee of £160 million over five years. The British Government has expressed the hope that elections for a new Turks and Caicos Government can take place in 2012, bringing direct rule to an end. Direct rule has caused considerable discontent amongst some sections of the local population. Contents 1 Background 2 2 Developments under the current Government 2 2.1 May-December 2010 2 2.2 2011 3 DFID loan guarantee 3 A new Constitution approved 4 Other developments 4 2.3 Developments during 2012 6 3 Further reading 9 This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it. A suitably qualified professional should be consulted if specific advice or information is required.
    [Show full text]
  • TCI Inquiry Report
    Turks and Caicos Islands Commission of Inquiry 2008‐2009 into possible corruption or other serious dishonesty in relation to past and present elected members of the Legislature in recent years Report of the Commissioner The Right Honourable Sir Robin Auld Presented to His Excellency, Gordon Wetherell, Governor of the Turks and Caicos Islands TURKS and CAICOS ISLANDS COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO GOVERNMENTAL CORRUPTION REPORT CONTENTS Page No Appointment of Commission 5 Submission of Report to the Governor 7 Acknowledgements 9 Summary of the Report 11 1 ‐ INTRODUCTION The Nature of th e Inquiry 14 Brief Description of the Turks and Caicos Islands 17 Short History of the Islands 19 Matters giving rise to the Commission’s appointment 27 Scope and conduct of the Commission’s Inquiry 31 2 ‐ CORRUPTION Introduction 48 Conflicts of interest 52 Disclosure of interests 55 Politics and political donations 62 Belongership 67 1 Constitutional Watch Dogs 69 3 ‐ CONTEXT OF CORRUPTION Abuse of office and of the political and electoral process 77 Crown Land 81 Public contracts 100 Immigration and permission to work 104 Revenues and Exemptions 108 4 ‐ INFORMATION OF POSSIBLE CORRUPTION AND/OR OTHER SERIOUS DISHONESTY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Introduction 113 The Hon Michael Misick Background 114 Declarations of Interests 119 Disclosure of Interests to the Commission 119 Political Donations or ‘Loans’ 120 Other Payments 125 Tourism 132 Use of Government and leased aircraft 138 Casablanca Casino and the Windsor Investment Group Ltd 141 Joe Grant Cay 146 Salt Cay
    [Show full text]
  • Un-Redacted Report 2009
    Turks and Caicos Islands Commission of Inquiry 2008-2009 into possible corruption or other serious dishonesty in relation to past and present elected members of the Legislature in recent years Report of the Commissioner The Right Honourable Sir Robin Auld Note Redactions to this Report have been made on the authority of His Excellency the Governor pursuant to: (a) directions given by the Hon. Chief Justice in proceedings brought by Dr Cem Kinay and others, and Mr Mario Hoffmann; and (b) an assurance given by the Hon. Attorney General in proceeding brought by Mr Jak Civre, regarding its publication at this time. Presented to His Excellency, Gordon Wetherell, Governor of the Turks and Caicos Islands 1 TURKS and CAICOS ISLANDS COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO GOVERNMENTAL CORRUPTION REPORT CONTENTS Page No Appointment of Commission 5 Submission of Report to the Governor 7 Acknowledgements 9 Summary of the Report 11 1 - INTRODUCTION The Nature of the Inquiry 14 Brief Description of the Turks and Caicos Islands 17 Short History of the Islands 19 Matters giving rise to the Commission’s appointment 27 Scope and conduct of the Commission’s Inquiry 31 2 - CORRUPTION Introduction 48 Conflicts of interest 52 Disclosure of interests 55 Politics and political donations 62 Belongership 67 Constitutional Watch Dogs 69 2 3 - CONTEXT OF CORRUPTION Abuse of office and of the political and electoral process 77 Crown Land 81 Public contracts 100 Immigration and permission to work 104 Revenues and Exemptions 108 4 - INFORMATION OF POSSIBLE CORRUPTION AND/OR OTHER
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 10 March 2009
    United Nations A/AC.109/2009/10 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 March 2009 Original: English Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples Turks and Caicos Islands Working paper prepared by the Secretariat Contents Page I. General ....................................................................... 3 II. Constitutional, legal and political issues ............................................ 4 III. Budget ....................................................................... 8 IV. Economic conditions ............................................................ 9 A. General................................................................... 9 B. Tourism .................................................................. 10 C. Financial services .......................................................... 11 D. Agriculture, fisheries and construction ......................................... 12 E. Infrastructure .............................................................. 12 V. Social conditions ............................................................... 13 A. General................................................................... 13 B. Immigration and labour ..................................................... 13 C. Education, youth and sports .................................................. 14 D. Health.................................................................... 15 E. Crime and justice .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Governance in the UK Overseas Territories: the Case of the Turks and Caicos Islands
    Governance in the UK Overseas Territories: The Case of the Turks and Caicos Islands Abstract The Turks and Caicos Islands (TCI) is one of 14 Overseas Territories still overseen by the United Kingdom (UK). Underpinned by tourism, property development and financial services, the TCI experienced economic growth amongst the highest in the world. However, it now appears that this economic success was built on a political, economic and social system that was rotten to the core, and which created “a national emergency” that potentially threatened the very future of the country. The paper considers the report of the recent UK government-appointed Commission of Inquiry into alleged corruption in the TCI, the British decision to impose direct rule, and Caribbean reactions to the affair. More generally, the paper analyses the UK government’s approach to all of its Caribbean Overseas Territories in light of the Commission’s report, and whether UK government policy since the 1999 White Paper “Partnership for Progress and Prosperity”, has therefore failed in terms of instilling and encouraging good governance in the territories. Introduction The Turks and Caicos Islands (TCI) is one of 14 Overseas Territories still overseen by the United Kingdom (UK). Situated to the south of the Bahamas chain and 90 miles north of Haiti and the Dominican Republic, the TCI has had its own constitutional relationship with the UK since 1976. Under the Constitution there is an allocation of responsibilities between the British Crown, acting through the Governor, and the locally elected TCI government. However, ultimate responsibility lies with the UK, including the power of the Queen to legislate for the TCI by Order in Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The Turks and Caicos Islands
    The Turks and Caicos Islands Standard Note: SN05038 Last updated: 31 December 2012 Author: Jon Lunn Section International Affairs and Defence Section This note briefly reviews the crisis of political and economic governance which has affected the Turks and Caicos Islands since 2008, leading to the imposition of direct rule, the launching of anti-corruption investigations (including against senior government figures) and, with the economy experiencing serious problems, the exceptional introduction by the British Government of a rescue package in the form of a loan guarantee of £160 million over five years (2011-16). Significant sections of the local population strongly resented direct rule. With trials now under way and a range of other measures enacted to improve governance, fresh elections were held in November 2012, bringing to an end the period of direct rule. These elections were won narrowly by the Progressive National Party, now under new leadership, which had been in government when the crisis originally broke. The UK is also currently seeking the extradition from Brazil of former Premier Michael Misick, who was arrested in Rio de Janeiro in December 2012 after his application for political asylum was rejected. Only time will tell whether the Turks and Caicos Islands are now set on a new course – and, if so, what that course is. This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it.
    [Show full text]
  • National Integrity System Country Report: Turks and Caicos Islands
    TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL the global coalition against corruption NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM COUNTRY REPORT: TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS www.transparency.org Transparency International (TI) is the global civil society organisation leading the fight against corruption. Through more than 90 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, TI raises awareness of the damaging effects of corruption and works with partners in government, business and civil society to develop and implement effective measures to tackle it. www.transparency.org This report was produced thanks to the financial support of UKAid © Cover photo: Flickr/wumpiewoo Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of January 2011. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. ISBN: 978-3-935711-65-4 ©2011 Transparency International. All rights reserved. Printed on 100% recycled paper. I Introductory Information 4 Table of Contents II About the NIS Assessment 8 III Executive Summary 13 IV Country Profile 20 V Corruption Profile 33 VI Anti-Corruption Activities 41 VII The National Integrity System 46 1. Legislature 47 2. Executive 57 3. Judiciary 70 4. Public Sector 77 5. Law Enforcement Agencies 89 6. Electoral Management Body 95 7. Ombudsman 102 8. Supreme Audit Institution 111 9. Anti-Corruption Agencies 121 10. Political Parties 123 11. Media 133 12. Civil Society 140 13. Business 146 VIII Conclusion 152 IX Bibliography 158 3 NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM | TURKS & CAICOS ISLANDS 2009 I INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION I INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION 4 NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM | TURKS & CAICOS ISLANDS 2009 I INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION Authors Lead Researcher Trevor St.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Crisis Female Leadership Signals Competence and Change
    Backwards and in Heels: Post-Crisis Female Leadership Signals Competence and Change Dayna Judge Abstract Recent scholarship has suggested that women are more likely to achieve leadership positions during times of crisis, a phenomenon known as the glass cliff. However, most previous research on the glass cliff has been largely descriptive, and fails to adequately test the mechanism(s) at work. It may be the case that men step aside after crisis because failure is likely and the position becomes less valuable. Or the mechanism might be more insidious: women are used as “sacrificial lambs” on whom likely failure can be blamed. Finally, it may be that women are seen as more capable of cleaning up post-crisis, or that they are meant to represent a change from the status quo. This paper examines how well the glass cliff framework fits the selection of women to executive political positions in two notable cases following crises. Using firsthand interviews, it shows that in the cases of the victory of Theresa May in the 2016 UK Conservative Party leadership contest, and the election of Sharlene Cartwright-Robinson as the first female Premier of the Turks and Caicos Islands, gender operated as a signal of ability to handle the crisis, and as a change from the status quo. Furthermore, this research suggests that this effect operates most strongly when the crisis can be specifically attributed to the preceding male leader, and when the incoming female leader is unassociated with creating the crisis. 1 Introduction In 2016, the British overseas territory of the Turks and Caicos Islands (TCI) elected its first female premier, Sharlene Cartwright-Robinson.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 20 February 2014
    United Nations A/AC.109/2014/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 February 2014 Original: English Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples Turks and Caicos Islands Working paper prepared by the Secretariat Contents Page The Territory at a glance ........................................................... 3 I. Constitutional, legal and political issues .............................................. 4 II. Budget ......................................................................... 5 III. Economic conditions .............................................................. 6 A. General................................................................... 6 B. Tourism and construction .................................................... 6 C. Financial services .......................................................... 6 D. Agriculture and fisheries .................................................... 7 E. Communications and utilities................................................. 7 IV. Social conditions ................................................................. 8 A. General................................................................... 8 B. Labour and immigration ..................................................... 8 C. Education ................................................................. 9 Note: The information contained in the present working paper has been derived from public sources, including those of the
    [Show full text]
  • The Election Observation Mission to the Turks And
    THE ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION TO THE TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS, CARRIED OUT BY THE BRITISH ISLANDS AND MEDITERRANEAN REGION OF THE COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION OF THE (CPA BIMR) 15th December 2016 Elections to the House of Assembly FINAL REPORT The Mission would like to thank the Governor and his staff, political parties, media, the electoral authorities, police and most importantly the voters for their cooperation and assistance, and for placing no impediments to observation activities. 1 CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Political Background 4 Legislative Framework and Electoral System 4 Electoral System 7 The Right to Vote and Voter Registration 7 Candidate Registration 9 Campaign and Campaign Finance 10 Election Administration 11 Complaints and Appeals 12 Voting and Counting of Votes 12 Mission Information 14 Appendix 16 2 Executive Summary The Election Observation Mission (EOM) to the Turks and Caicos Islands took place between 8th and 18th December 2016, and was made up of six members. The observers found that the voting and counting process was good or very good in all polling stations visited. Voting was broadly orderly and transparent, and counting was conducted in a transparent and generally well- organised manner. The increase in the number of polling stations and officials is to be welcomed, however there were still some long queues after opening. The main problem observed was a lack of consistency, particularly as regards to the layout of polling stations, the way in which Presiding Officers checked their initials on the ballot, and the information that was handwritten on the ballot’s counterfoil. However, it is important to stress that these inconsistencies did not have an impact upon the integrity of the process.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 8 March 2013
    United Nations A/AC.109/2013/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 8 March 2013 Original: English Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples Turks and Caicos Islands Working paper prepared by the Secretariat Contents Page The Territory at a glance ......................................................... 3 I. Constitutional, legal and political issues ............................................ 4 II. Budget ....................................................................... 6 III. Economic conditions ............................................................ 6 A. General................................................................... 6 B. Tourism .................................................................. 6 C. Financial services .......................................................... 7 D. Agriculture and fisheries .................................................... 7 E. Communications and construction............................................. 7 IV. Social conditions ............................................................... 8 A. General................................................................... 8 B. Labour and immigration ..................................................... 8 C. Education ................................................................. 8 Note: The information contained in the present working paper has been derived from public sources, including those of the territorial Government,
    [Show full text]