DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to Common Native and Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to Common Native and Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Portland State University PDXScholar Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations Center for Lakes and Reservoirs 2009 Introduction to Common Native and Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Vanessa Howard Morgan Portland State University Mark Sytsma Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub Part of the Other Environmental Sciences Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Morgan, Vanessa Howard and Sytsma, Mark, "Introduction to Common Native and Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska" (2009). Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations. 26. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub/26 This Technical Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting Options ............. xxiii * names shown in red are potentially invasive in Alaska * Chapter 1 – Shoreline Plants Alisma triviale - Northern water-plantain ................................................. 4 Sagittaria cuneata - Duck potato .....................................................................6 Calla palustris - Water arum ...................................................................... 8 Lysichiton americanus - American skunkcabbage ................................................ 10 Myosotis scorpioides - True forget-me-not ...............................................12 Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum - Watercress .................................................... 14 Butomus umbellatus - Flowering rush .................................................... 16 Carex spp. - Sedges .....................................................................................................18 Dulichium arundinaceum - Dulichium ...................................................................20 Eleocharis acicularis - Needle spike-rush ..............................................................22 Eleocharis palustris - Common spike-rush ...........................................................22 Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani - Softstem bulrush.................................................... 24 Scirpus microcarpus - Panicled bulrush.................................................... 24 Equisetum fluviatile - Water horsetail .............................................................26 Equisetum variegatum - Variegated horsetail ..............................................................26 Myriophyllum aquaticum - Parrot feather watermilfoil ............................... 28 Hippuris montana - Mountain mare’s-tail .......................................................... 30 Hippuris vulgaris - Common mare’s-tail .......................................................... 32 Hippuris tetraphylla - Fourleaf mare’s-tail .......................................................... 32 Juncus spp. - Rushes ......................................................................................... 34 Juncus supiniformis - Hairyleaf rush ..............................................................34 Lysimachia thyrsiflora - Tufted loosestife ..........................................................36 Lysimachia vulgaris - Garden loosestrife ..........................................................36 Lythrum salicaria - Purple loosestrife .........................................................38 iv Chapter 1 – Shoreline Plants continued Menyanthes trifoliata - Buckbean .............................................................40 Myrica gale - sweetgale .....................................................................42 Calamagrostis canadensis - bluejoint reedgrass ............................44 Phalaris arundinacea - Reed Canarygrass .......................................................46 Polygonum amphibium - Water Smartweed ............................................... 48 Polygonum persicaria - Spotted ladysthumb ................................................48 Ranunculus repens - creeping buttercup..................................... 50 Comarum palustre - Purple marshlocks ................................................ 52 Typha latifolia - broadleaf cattail.............................................. 54 Sparganium angustifolium - Narrow Leaf bur-reed...........................................56 Sparganium hyperboreum - Northern bur-reed ....................................................... 58 Sparganium natans - Small bur-reed ....................................................... 58 Chapter 2 – Floating Leaved Rooted Plants Brasenia schreberi - Water-shield ............................................................62 Nymphoides peltata - Yellow Floating-heart ......................................64 Nuphar lutea ssp. polysepala - Yellow pond-lily ............................. 66 Nymphaea odorata spp. odorata - American white waterlily .......................68 Nymphaea tetragona - Pygmy waterlily .....................................................70 Potamogeton alpinus - Alpine Pondweed ......................................................... 72 Potamogeton gramineus - Grass-leaved Pondweed......................................... 72 Potamogeton epihydrus - Ribbonleaf Pondweed..............................................74 Potamogeton natans - Floating-leaved Pondweed............................................74 Trapa natans - Water Chestnut .........................................................................76 Chapter 3 – Free Floating Plants Azolla filiculoides - Pacific azolla .....................................................................80 Lemna minor - Common duckweed ......................................................................82 Riccia fluitans - Slender riccia ......................................................................... 84 Ricciocarpus natans - Purple-fringed riccia...................................................... 84 TABLE OF CONTENTS v Chapter 4 – Submersed Plants Cabomba caroliniana - Fanwort ......................................................................88 Callitriche heterophylla - Two-headed water-starwort................................. 90 Callitriche palustris - Vernal water-starwort ......................................................... 90 Callitriche stagnalis - Pond water-starwort .......................................................92 Callitriche hermaphroditica - Autumnal water-starwort.................................... 92 Ceratophyllum demersum - Coontail ................................................................94 Egeria densa - Brazilian waterweed ..................................................................... 96 Elodea canadensis - Common waterweed .....................................................98 Hydrilla verticillata - Hydrilla ........................................................................100 Isoetes spp. - Quillworts ................................................................................ 102 Isoetes tenella - Spiny-spore quillworts .......................................................... 102 Lemna trisulca - Star duckweed ....................................................................... 104 Limosella aquatica - Water Mudwort ............................................................. 106 Lobelia dortmanna - Water Lobelia ............................................................... 108 Myriophyllum sibiricum - Shortspike watermilfoil .....................................................110 Myriophyllum spicatum - Eurasian watermilfoil..............................................112 Myriophyllum verticillatum - Whorl-leaf watemilfoil .................................................. 114 Najas flexilis - Nodding waternymph ...........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eleocharis Palustris (L.) Roem
    Plant Guide COMMON SPIKERUSH Conservation Uses: This species has utility for erosion control, constructed wetland system applications, wildlife Eleocharis palustris (L.) Roem. & food and cover, wetland creation and restoration, and for Schult. increasing plant diversity in wetland and riparian Plant Symbol = ELPA3 communities. Its dense root mass makes this species an excellent choice for soil stabilization in riparian and wetland sites. The rhizomes also form a matrix for many Contributed by: USDA NRCS Idaho Plant Materials beneficial bacteria making this plant an excellent choice Program for wastewater treatment. Status Please consult the PLANTS Web site and your State Department of Natural Resources for this plant’s current status (e.g., threatened or endangered species, state noxious status, and wetland indicator values). Description General: Rush Family (Cyperaceae). Creeping spikerush is a perennial, heavily rhizomatous wetland plant that is found from low to mid elevations. It has a dense root mass that extends deeper that 40 cm (16 in) in the soil profile. The stems are singular or in small clusters and it will continue to grow to keep the heads out of the water if the water rises slowly. The stems are upright, round, and may reach 1.2 m (4 ft) in height (height is dependent on the depth of water in the growing environment). The leaves are reduced to sheaths clustered at the base of the stems. The flowers are borne in a terminal spikelet, 1 flower per scale with 2 stigmas. Plants typically flower from June through September. The seeds are yellow to brown lenticular achenes, 1.5-2.5 mm (0.06-0.1 in) long including tubercle, and subtended by up to 8 bristles (Welsh et al., 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 – Biological Resources 6 - 1 Draft EIR Mill Creek Project June 2018 and Features Adjacent Woodlands
    Draft EIR Mill Creek Project June 2018 6 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 6.1 INTRODUCTION The Biological Resources chapter of the EIR evaluates the biological resources known to occur or potentially occur within the Mill Creek Project (proposed project) site, as well as biological resources known to occur in off-site areas where off-site project work may occur. This chapter describes potential impacts to those resources, and identifies measures to reduce those impacts to less-than-significant levels. Existing plant communities, wetlands, wildlife habitats, and potential for special-status species and communities are discussed for the project area. The information contained in this analysis is primarily based on the Biological Resources Assessment1 and the Special-Status Plant Survey Report2 prepared by Madrone Ecological Consulting, LLC (Madrone). Information concerning existing on-site trees was provided by the Arborist Reports prepared by Abacus Consulting Arborists. Further information was sourced from the Placer County General Plan,3 the Placer County General Plan EIR,4 and the Dry Creek-West Placer Community Plan (DCWPCP).5 6.2 EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The following sections describe the existing environmental setting related to biological resources occurring in the proposed project area. Regional Setting The proposed project site is located north of Antelope and southwest of the City of Roseville, in an unincorporated portion of western Placer County, within the DCWPCP. The DCWPCP experiences a Mediterranean type climate with cool, wet winters, and hot, dry summers. Temperatures in the project area fluctuate from average highs in July of 95 degrees Fahrenheit, with average lows in December and January, averaging 39 degrees Fahrenheit for both months.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Survey of Bussey Brook Meadow Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts
    Botanical Survey of Bussey Brook Meadow Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts Botanical Survey of Bussey Brook Meadow Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts New England Wildflower Society 180 Hemenway Road Framingham, MA 01701 508-877-7630 www.newfs.org Report by Joy VanDervort-Sneed, Atkinson Conservation Fellow and Ailene Kane, Plant Conservation Volunteer Coordinator Prepared for the Arboretum Park Conservancy Funded by the Arnold Arboretum Committee 2 Conducted 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................4 METHODS....................................................................................................................................6 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................8 Plant Species ........................................................................................................................8 Natural Communities...........................................................................................................9 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................15 Recommendations for Management ..................................................................................15 Recommendations for Education and Interpretation .........................................................17 Acknowledgments..............................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting the Natural Endangered Heritage in Romania, Croatia, Poland and Slovenia
    Available online at http://journals.usamvcluj.ro/index.php/promediu ProEnvironment ProEnvironment 11 (2018) 143-157 Review The Rights of Alive – Protecting the Natural Endangered Heritage in Romania, Croatia, Poland and Slovenia CIOANCĂ Lia-Maria1*, Luminița UJICĂ2, Marijana MIKULANDRA3, Ryszard SOŁTYSIK4, Maja ČERNE5 1Babeș-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, University Extension Bistrița, Andrei Mureşanu st., no. 3-5, Romania 2High Scool with Sportive Program Bistrița, Calea Moldovei no. 18. Romania 3OŠ Tina Ujevi Osnovna škola Tina Ujevića Koturaška cesta 75 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 4Zespół Szkół Nr1 w Humniskach, 36 – 206, Huminska 264, Poland 5OŠ Rogaška Slatina, Kidričeva ulica 24, 3250 Rogaška Slatina Slovenia Received 23 July 2018; received and revised form 18 September 2018; accepted 25 September 2018 Available online 30 September 2018 Abstract This article deals with the impact of destructive actions of human population on natural world. As a consequence of relying on non-renewable energy sources and reckless encroachment on natural habitats a lot of plant and animal species have become extinct and more and more species are getting endangered. Thus celebrating biodiversity and solidarity for all life forms, from the tiniest one to the most complex eco-systems, has been in the centre of our attention and operational activities. Keywords: durable development, ecology, endangered species. 1. Introduction Within the massive destruction of forests and forest climate, we witness significant changes, Just as the man has passed from the stage of sometimes radical of the environment. For the animal hunter and collector up to animal raiser and farmer, and plants which have survived through a long period the natural vegetation has increasingly been subject of adaptation, a new difficult era starts again.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Empfehlung-Invasive-Arten.Pdf
    09-15078 rev FORMAT FOR A PRA RECORD (version 3 of the Decision support scheme for PRA for quarantine pests) European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation Organisation Européenne et Méditerranéenne pour la Protection des Plantes Guidelines on Pest Risk Analysis Lignes directrices pour l'analyse du risque phytosanitaire Decision-support scheme for quarantine pests Version N°3 PEST RISK ANALYSIS FOR LYSICHITON AMERICANUS HULTÉN & ST. JOHN (ARACEAE) Pest risk analyst: Revised by the EPPO ad hoc Panel on Invasive Alien Species Stage 1: Initiation The EWG was held on 2009-03-25/27, and was composed of the following experts: - Ms Beate Alberternst, Projektgruppe Biodiversität und Landschaftsökologie ([email protected]) - M. Serge Buholzer, Federal Department of Economic Affairs DEA ([email protected]) - M. Manuel Angel Duenas, CEH Wallingford ([email protected]) - M. Guillaume Fried, LNPV Station de Montpellier, SupAgro ([email protected]), - M. Jonathan Newman, CEH Wallingford ([email protected]), - Ms Gritta Schrader, Julius Kühn Institut (JKI) ([email protected]), - M. Ludwig Triest, Algemene Plantkunde en Natuurbeheer (APNA) ([email protected]) - M. Johan van Valkenburg, Plant Protection Service ([email protected]) 1 What is the reason for performing the Lysichiton americanus originates from the pacific coastal zone of Northwest-America PRA? and was imported into the UK at the beginning of the 20th century as a garden ornamental, and has since been sold in many European countries, including southern 1 09-15078 rev countries like Italy. It is now found in 11 European countries. The species has been observed to reduce biodiversity in the Taunus region in Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Vulgaris in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and Adjacent Areas
    Chloroplast DNA Phylogeography Reveals Repeated Range Expansion in a Widespread Aquatic Herb Hippuris vulgaris in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and Adjacent Areas Jin-Ming Chen1., Zhi-Yuan Du1., Shan-Shan Sun1,2, Robert Wahiti Gituru3, Qing-Feng Wang1* 1 Key Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology, Wuhan Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2 Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 3 Botany Department, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract Background: The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP) is one of the most extensive habitats for alpine plants in the world. Climatic oscillations during the Quaternary ice age had a dramatic effect on species ranges on the QTP and the adjacent areas. However, how the distribution ranges of aquatic plant species shifted on the QTP in response to Quaternary climatic changes remains almost unknown. Methodology and Principal Findings: We studied the phylogeography and demographic history of the widespread aquatic herb Hippuris vulgaris from the QTP and adjacent areas. Our sampling included 385 individuals from 47 natural populations of H. vulgaris. Using sequences from four chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) non-coding regions, we distinguished eight different cpDNA haplotypes. From the cpDNA variation in H. vulgaris, we found a very high level of population differentiation (GST = 0.819) but the phylogeographical structure remained obscure (NST = 0.853.GST = 0.819, P.0.05). Phylogenetic analyses revealed two main cpDNA haplotype lineages. The split between these two haplotype groups can be dated back to the mid-to-late Pleistocene (ca. 0.480 Myr). Mismatch distribution analyses showed that each of these had experienced a recent range expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Vascular Plant Species Distribution Maps
    Appendix 11.5.1: Aquatic Vascular Plant Species Distribution Maps These distribution maps are for 116 aquatic vascular macrophyte species (Table 1). Aquatic designation follows habitat descriptions in Haines and Vining (1998), and includes submergent, floating and some emergent species. See Appendix 11.4 for list of species. Also included in Appendix 11.4 is the number of HUC-10 watersheds from which each taxon has been recorded, and the county-level distributions. Data are from nine sources, as compiled in the MABP database (plus a few additional records derived from ancilliary information contained in reports from two fisheries surveys in the Upper St. John basin organized by The Nature Conservancy). With the exception of the University of Maine herbarium records, most locations represent point samples (coordinates were provided in data sources or derived by MABP from site descriptions in data sources). The herbarium data are identified only to township. In the species distribution maps, town-level records are indicated by center-points (centroids). Figure 1 on this page shows as polygons the towns where taxon records are identified only at the town level. Data Sources: MABP ID MABP DataSet Name Provider 7 Rare taxa from MNAP lake plant surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 8 Lake plant surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 35 Acadia National Park plant survey C. Greene et al. 63 Lake plant surveys A. Dieffenbacher-Krall 71 Natural Heritage Database (rare plants) MNAP 91 University of Maine herbarium database C. Campbell 183 Natural Heritage Database (delisted species) MNAP 194 Rapid bioassessment surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 207 Invasive aquatic plant records MDEP Maps are in alphabetical order by species name.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]