JOHN STUART MILL and HIS FATHER JAMES MILL Autograph Letters & Rare Books

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JOHN STUART MILL and HIS FATHER JAMES MILL Autograph Letters & Rare Books JOHN STUART MILL AND HIS FATHER JAMES MILL Autograph letters & rare books HAMISH RILEY-SMITH RARE BOOKS Swanton Abbot Hall, Swanton Abbot, Norfolk, England NR10 5DJ Tel. +44 (0)1692538244 Mob. +44 (0)7802276820 E mail [email protected] www.riley-smith.com HAMISH RILEY-SMITH RARE BOOKS 2.James Mill letter to Jeremy Bentham May 1831 5.John Stuart Mill letter to Albany Fonblanque April 1836 2 HAMISH RILEY-SMITH RARE BOOKS JOHN STUART MILL AND HIS FATHER JAMES MILL James Mill and his son John Stuart Mill are two of the most eminent figures in the intellectual life of the 19th century. The utilitarian philosopher James Mill [1773-1836] is chiefly remembered to-day as the disciple of Jeremy Bentham. From humble beginnings in Scotland he came to London and supported himself and his family writing for the periodicals. In 1808 he published Commerce Defended, a rare pamphlet, which led to his friendship with David Ricardo. In 1812 he published anonymously Schools for all, a review of the arguments of Dr. Herbert Marsh and others in opposition to the Lancastrian plans for educating the poor. His friends in London, from an early period, included the South American patriot General Miranda, Jeremy Bentham, the economist David Ricardo, George Grote, Joseph Hume, the Quaker and philanthropist William Allen and the radical tailor Francis Place. Of all these, Bentham was his most intimate friend. His friendship with Jeremy Bentham changed his life, staying at Bentham’s house at Ford Abbey in Somerset and becoming in Leslie Stephens words ‘Bentham’s bodyguard’. With the publication of his History of India in 1817 James Mill became more prosperous. He was the first British historian to give a comprehensive treatment to Indian history as a whole. This was to lead to employment at the India Office which was to last for the remainder of his life. James Mill’s contributions of articles to the Encyclopaedia Britannica and in particular that on Government was described by his son as a “masterpiece of political wisdom”; by the Philosophical Radicals it became a sort of authorized Benthamite primer on political theory. He was a founder member of the Political Economy Club in 1820, drafting the rules and published the Elements of Political Economy, an exposition of David Ricardo’s doctrine and described by Palgrave as his masterpiece; it had evolved from his conversations with his young son John Stuart on walks. In 1829 his work Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind was published and in 1835 A Fragment on Mackintosh described by Leslie Stephens as ‘one of the most characteristic expressions of utilitarian morals’. John Stuart Mill’s [1806-1873] upbringing was not conventional. Both his father and Bentham considered an academic education greatly overrated and were convinced that they had in their hands the raw material for the perfect man – a tabula rasa – a blank sheet on which the perfect character could be drawn. His own account of the regime to educate him can be found in his Autobiography and amazes all who read it. This was completed by the age of fourteen and in 1820 he spent two years with the Bentham family in France and wrote of this period “the greatest, perhaps, of the many advantages which I owed to this episode in my education, was that of having breathed for a whole year, the free and genial atmosphere of Continental life...The chief fruit which I carried away from the society I saw, was a strong and permanent interest in Continental Liberalism, of which I ever afterwards kept myself au courant, as much as of English politics..” From this period he became a Francophile, speaking and writing French fluently, visiting many times on holiday, ‘botanising’ in the Vaucluse and eventually having a second home there and being buried in Avignon. “Mill would shortly become one of England’s leading, and for a while, foremost – commentators on French affairs. Politically, France would be his benchmark and inspiration, the main laboratory for the great ‘democratic experiment’, until the 1850’s when the United States attracted more attention” Reeves. He joined the Examiner’s Office in the East India Company as a clerk in 1823, a vacancy being available as a result of his fathers’ promotion. Between 1822 and 1830 he published many letters and articles in the periodicals such as the Morning Chronicle, the Lancet, Black Dwarf, the Westminster Review, and the Parliamentary Review, on economics and political economy, free speech, law and law reform, absenteeism, the Game Laws; they included reviews of Tooke’s High and Low Prices, Malthus’s Measure of 3 HAMISH RILEY-SMITH RARE BOOKS Value, William Blake’s Cash Payments, Mignet’s History of the French Revolution and Whateley’s Elements of Logic. This was to continue throughout his life. His greatest achievement to date was his work on the Bentham manuscript The Rationale of Judicial Evidence, which was published in 1827 in five volumes. Mill, at the age of twenty-five, prepared the work for the press; with eight sections in which Mill either augmented or completed Bentham’s narrative; and with numerous notes to the text, signed to distinguish them from Bentham’s notes. It was a massive task, as it required Mill to study all the best authorities past or present on the English law of evidence. ‘It occupied all my leisure for about a year’. He was an early, enthusiastic and profuse contributor to The Westminster Review, founded by Jeremy Bentham in 1824. In 1834 he was offered the complete control of the new London Review [later the London & Westminster Review] by William Molesworth, though the nominal editorship had to lie elsewhere because of Mill’s employment at India House. In 1830 Mill met Harriet Taylor, described as the ‘ambitious dissatisfied wife of an older man’.i They had been introduced by the Unitarian minister William Fox. Mill was to write ‘I formed the friendship, which has been the honour and chief blessing of my existence, as well as the source of a great part of all that I have attempted to do, or hope to effect, for human improvement.’ At the beginning Mill and Harriet made little attempt to conceal their friendship, until they became aware of the gossip it was causing and then, withdrew almost completely from all social contacts. Besides all his articles and reviews, he produced three books before his marriage to Harriet in 1851; A System of Logic 1843, Essays on some unsettled questions on political economy 1844, and Principles of Political Economy 1848. The last was described by Mill in his manuscript list of his publications as ‘a joint production with my wife’ adding in his Autobiography that ‘The Political Economy was far more rapidly executed than the Logic, or indeed than anything of importance which I had previously written. It was commenced in the autumn of 1845, and was ready for the press before the end of 1847.’ Mill and Harriet were married in 1851. She died tragically in Avignon in 1858. He bought a farmhouse near Avignon near the graveyard where Harriet was buried and was to spend many months of the year there until he died in 1873. After Harriet’s death he immediately planned the publication of On Liberty. He wrote in his Autobiography “The ‘Liberty’ was more directly and literally our joint production than anything else which bears my name, for there was not a sentence of it which was not several times gone through by us together, turned over in many ways, and carefully weeded of any faults, either in thought or expression, that we detected in it.” On Liberty was published in 1859, to be followed by Thoughts on Parliamentary Reform 1859, Considerations on Representative Government 1861, Utilitarianism 1863, An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy 1865, Auguste Comte and Positivism 1865 and Subjection of Women 1869. He continued, at the same time, to write in the periodicals. In 1865 he became a Member of Parliament. He spoke for women’s suffrage and the abolition of capital punishment as well as land tenure reform and many other issues. He attended the House regularly and it was said that the tone of the debates were perceptibly raised by his speeches. He died in Avignon in 1873 and is buried in the churchyard there. He remains one of the greatest figures of the 19th century and his thought and ideas are still relevant, discussed and quoted in the 21st century. 4 HAMISH RILEY-SMITH RARE BOOKS INDEX AUTOGRAPH LETTERS 1. James Mill to Josiah Conder. 2 pages Ford Abbey, August 9 1816 2. James Mill to Jeremy Bentham. 3 pages E.India House Tuesday [May 17th] 1831 3. J.S.Mill to William Cabell 2 pages Ex[aminer’s] Off[ice] Tuesday [no date circaearly 1830’s] 4. J.S.Mill to Thomas Falconer. 3 pages I[ndia] H[ouse], Saturday 3d Oct. [1835] 5. J.S.Mill to Albany Fonblanque 3 pages Kensington, Tuesday [April 19th 1836] J.S.Mill to Rev.George Armstrong 4 pages Kensington, April 19th 1836 J.S.Mill to Albany Fonblanque 2 pages I[ndia] H[ouse] [April 1836] J.S.Mill to Rev.George Armstrong 3 pages India House, August 13th 1838 6. J.S.Mill to Gilbert Urbain Guillaumin. 3 pages Saint Vèran, Avignon le 22 Janvier 1862 7. J.S.Mill to Pastor Louis Rey of Avignon. 3 pages Blackheath Park, August 13th 1865 8. J.S.Mill to John Nicolaus Trübner 4 pages Berlin, September 13th 1865 9. J.S.Mill to Edwin Arnold.
Recommended publications
  • Guide to the Correspondence Series Within The
    GUIDE TO THE CORRESPONDENCE SERIES WITHIN THE CHARLES BABBAGE / NEVILLE BABBAGE ARCHIVES IN THE POWERHOUSE MUSEUM 97/186 97/229/1 Paul Wilson 2010 COLLECTED ARCHIVES SERIES DESCRIPTION Registration Number: 97/186/1-1 Creators: Babbage, Charles Babbage, Neville Series Title: Correspondence to Charles Babbage Date Range: 1826-1894 Physical Characteristics: Handwritten letters, envelopes, cards, invitation and document Description: Correspondence, letters (17), cards (6), envelopes (29), one invitation and one document, to Charles Babbage, Charles Babbage/Neville Babbage, England/Australia, 1826-1894 This series contains correspondence predominantly sent to Charles Babbage. The letters provide evidence of his interests and social connections. Babbage was a well known figure in London society. He was friends with many prominent people, such as Charles Dickens, Thomas Carlyle, Sir John Herschel and Charles Darwin. He held regular Saturday evening parties at his home in Manchester Square for many years, which were apparently attended by two or three hundred people and were said to be a meeting place for Europe's liberal intelligentsia. This series contains a letter from Joshua Field as well as correspondence from (Augusta) Ada King, Countess of Lovelace (Byron's daughter). Other correspondents include the Duchess Dowager of Somerset, the scientist Sir Charles Wheatstone, writer and statesman Edward Bulwer-Lytton, Admiral Edward Codrington, politician Henry Bougham, heiress and philanthropist Baroness Angela Georgina Burdett-Coutts, actor William McCready, scientific writer John Peter Gassoit and the civil engineer Isambar Kingdom Brunel. Many of the letters are invitations to social events. Arrangement: Based on order created by Neville Babbage Dimensions: Shelf Length 0.040 m Box Number: 1 COLLECTED ARCHIVES ITEM LIST Series Title: Item Number Item Title Box 97/186/1-1/1 Letter, Joshua Field to Charles Babbage, paper/ink/pencil, 14 1 November 1831 One page hand written letter in black ink from Joshua Field, Lambeth, London, England, to Charles Babbage.
    [Show full text]
  • Millicent Fawcett from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Millicent Fawcett From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Dame Millicent Garrett Fawcett, GBE (11 June 1847 – 5 August 1929) was an English feminist, intellectual, political and union leader, and writer. She is primarily known for her work as a campaigner for women to have Millicent Fawcett the vote. GBE As a suffragist (as opposed to a suffragette), she took a moderate line, but was a tireless campaigner. She concentrated much of her energy on the struggle to improve women's opportunities for higher education and in 1875 co­founded Newnham College, Cambridge.[1] She later became president of the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (the NUWSS), a position she held from 1897 until 1919. In July 1901 she was appointed to lead the British government's commission to South Africa to investigate conditions in the concentration camps that had been created there in the wake of the Second Boer War. Her report corroborated what the campaigner Emily Hobhouse had said about conditions in the camps. Contents 1 Early life 2 Married life 3 Later years 4 Political activities Born Millicent Garrett 5 Works 11 June 1847 6 See also Aldeburgh, England, United Kingdom 7 References 8 Archives Died 5 August 1929 (aged 82) 9 External links London, England, United Kingdom Nationality British Occupation Feminist, suffragist, union leader Early life Millicent Fawcett was born on 11 June 1847 in Aldeburgh[2] to Newson Garrett, a warehouse owner from Leiston, Suffolk, and his wife, Louisa née Dunnell (1813–1903), from London.[3][4] The Garrett ancestors had been ironworkers in East Suffolk since the early seventeenth century.[5] Newson Garrett was the youngest of three sons and not academically inclined, although he possessed the family’s entrepreneurial spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Heineman: Authority and the Liberal Tradition: Study Guide
    Scholars Crossing Faculty Publications and Presentations Helms School of Government 2003 Robert Heineman: Authority and the Liberal Tradition: Study Guide Steven Alan Samson Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs Part of the Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Samson, Steven Alan, "Robert Heineman: Authority and the Liberal Tradition: Study Guide" (2003). Faculty Publications and Presentations. 233. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs/233 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Helms School of Government at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ROBERT HEINEMAN: AUTHORITY AND THE LIBERAL TRADITION: STUDY GUIDE, 2001-2003 Steven Alan Samson Introduction Commentary and Study Questions The author's thesis may be summarized as follows: "Contemporary American liberalism is incapable of supporting for any sustained period of time a government that acts with firmness and coherent direction." Several implications are immediately drawn. Others may be inferred. Liberalism has promoted a "tremendous expansion of government within the past several decades," resulting in a "government lacking in authority and direction." One inference is that our political means (the sophisticated apparatus and process of government) outstrip the political ends (the substantive human purposes) they are supposed to serve. Remember Rushdoony's inescapable concepts]. Sometimes political programs are established for no better reason than that they can be.
    [Show full text]
  • Books by and About Women
    48 Books by and About Women MICHAEL THOMPSON BOOKS, 8242 West Third Street, Suite 230, Los Angeles, CA 90048 (323)658-1901 [email protected] The First Woman in the United States to Make Her Living as a Writer 1. ADAMS, Hannah. An Alphabetical Compendium of Various Sects Which have appeared in the World from the beginning of the Christian Aera to the present Day. With an Appendix, Containing a brief Account of the different Schemes of Religion Now embraced among Mankind. The whole collected From the best Authors, ancient and modern...Boston: Printed by B. Edes & Sons, 1784. Octavo. [2], ii, [2], 204. lxxxiii, [1, errata], [22, index, and list of subscribers] pp. Handsomely bound in full recent antique-style mottled calf. Gilt-ruled covers, gilt spine with red morocco label. Occasional foxing, as usual. Portion of top blank margin of title-page clipped away, old ink signature on “To the Readers” page. Overall a very good copy. $1,500 First edition. Hannah Adams (1755-1831) was the first woman in the United States to make her living as a writer. Born in Braintree, Massachusetts, Adams was a distant cousin of President John Adams and the daughter of a lifelong bibliophile called “Book” Adams, whose history included a failed attempt at bookselling. Too frail to go to school, she was taught Latin, Greek, geography and logic by theological students who boarded with her family. One of these students introduced her to Broughton’s Dictionary of Religions, which led to her interest in writing on religious topics. The present book, Adams’ first, was an important contribution to this literature, in that she represented denominations from the perspective of their adherents, without injecting her own opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gladstone and the Bank of England: a Study in Mid-Victorian Finance, 1833-1866
    GLADSTONE AND THE BANK OF ENGLAND: A STUDY IN MID-VICTORIAN FINANCE, 1833-1866 Patricia Caernarv en-Smith, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2007 APPROVED: Denis Paz, Major Professor Adrian Lewis, Committee Member and Chair of the Department of History Laura Stern, Committee Member Sandra L. Terrell, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Caernarven-Smith, Patricia. Gladstone and the Bank of England: A Study in Mid- Victorian Finance, 1833-1866. Master of Arts (History), May 2007, 378 pp., 11 tables, bibliography, 275 titles. The topic of this thesis is the confrontations between William Gladstone and the Bank of England. These confrontations have remained a mystery to authors who noted them, but have generally been ignored by others. This thesis demonstrates that Gladstone’s measures taken against the Bank were reasonable, intelligent, and important for the development of nineteenth-century British government finance. To accomplish this task, this thesis refutes the opinions of three twentieth-century authors who have claimed that many of Gladstone’s measures, as well as his reading, were irrational, ridiculous, and impolitic. My primary sources include the Gladstone Diaries, with special attention to a little-used source, Volume 14, the indexes to the Diaries. The day-to-day Diaries and the indexes show how much Gladstone read about financial matters, and suggest that his actions were based to a large extent upon his reading. In addition, I have used Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates and nineteenth-century periodicals and books on banking and finance to understand the political and economic debates of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth Garrett Anderson in Context: the Origins of the Women’S Movement in Mid- Victorian Britain
    Elizabeth Garrett Anderson in context: the origins of the women’s movement in mid- Victorian Britain By Professor Lawrence Goldman In 1840 in London at the first World Anti-Slavery Convention, a woman rose to speak from the separate enclosure where all women attendees at the meeting had been corralled. There was consternation and uproar and she was silenced. The following day The Times carried an editorial on the meeting and made unkind remarks on the manners of our American cousins because the woman in question was from the United States. Her name was Elizabeth Cady Stanton and she is often compared with Millicent Garrett Fawcett, the equally famous sister of Elizabeth Garrett Anderson. Elizabeth Cady Stanton led the movement for women’s enfranchisement in America in the late-19th century and often attested that it was her treatment in London in 1840 which made her the leading American feminist of her generation. In Britain in 1840 no respectable woman would speak in public; that was the privilege of men only. Yet fast-forward to Birmingham in October 1857 and the opening congress of an organisation called the Social Science Association, and here, for the first time, 17 years later, a middle-class woman spoke in open and mixed company. Her name was Mary Carpenter and she spoke about her work rescuing street children in Bristol and educating them in so-called ragged schools. Miss Carpenter was already a famous female philanthropist and the audience for this landmark speech was so large that the meeting was delayed while everyone moved to a bigger venue.
    [Show full text]
  • JSM Author List (Web Version)
    BOOKCASESHELF AUTHOR TITLE DATE K 8 [Académie Françoise] Dictionnaire de l'Académie Françoise… [1798] E 1 [Anthologia Graeca] Anthologia Graeca sive poetarum graecorum lusus 1794-1814 H 1 [Arabian Nights] The Arabian Nights, in five volumes, translated by the Reverend Edward Forster. With1802 engravings, from pictures by Robert Smirke E 3 [Aristotle] Andronici Rhodii ethicorum Nicomachaeorum paraphrasis cum interpretatione Danielis1617 Heinsii G 9 [Aristotle] Simplicii commentarii in quatuor Aristotelis Libros de Coelo, cum textu eiusdem 1527 G 9 [Aristotle] Simplicii Commentarii in octo Aristotelis Physicae Auscultationis Libros cum ipso Aristotelis1526 textu C 1 [Bank of England] Substance of the proceedings of a General Court of Proprietors held at the Bank…1809 G 3 [Bentham, Jeremy] Not Paul, but Jesus. By Gamaliel Smith [pseud. of Jeremy Bentham] 1823 B 4 [Cobden Club] Systems of land tenure in various countries: a series of essays published under the1870 sanction of the Cobden Club C 2 [Code Civil] Conférence du Code Civil, avec la discussion pariculière du Conseil d'État et du tribunat,1805 (An avant XIII) la redaction définitive de chaque projet de loi C 3 [Code Civil] Conférence du Code Civil, avec la discussion pariculière du Conseil d'État et du tribunat,1805 (An avant XIII) la redaction définitive de chaque projet de loi E 4 [Diaconus, Eugenius] [He logike ek palaionte kai neoteron suneranistheisa hupo eiugeniou diakonou tou[1766] boulgareos] H 7 [Dodsley's Old Plays] A supplement to Dodsley's Old Plays. Ed. Thomas Amyot et al. 1853 H 7 [Early prose and poetical tracts] Early prose and poetical tracts illustrative of the drama and literature of the reign1853 of Queen Elizabeth H 7 [Early treatises on the stage] Early treatises on the stage; viz.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Athenian Democracy.Pdf
    Rethinking Athenian Democracy A dissertation presented by Daniela Louise Cammack to The Department of Government in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Political Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts January 2013 © 2013 Daniela Cammack All rights reserved. Professor Richard Tuck Daniela Cammack Abstract Conventional accounts of classical Athenian democracy represent the assembly as the primary democratic institution in the Athenian political system. This looks reasonable in the light of modern democracy, which has typically developed through the democratization of legislative assemblies. Yet it conflicts with the evidence at our disposal. Our ancient sources suggest that the most significant and distinctively democratic institution in Athens was the courts, where decisions were made by large panels of randomly selected ordinary citizens with no possibility of appeal. This dissertation reinterprets Athenian democracy as “dikastic democracy” (from the Greek dikastēs, “judge”), defined as a mode of government in which ordinary citizens rule principally through their control of the administration of justice. It begins by casting doubt on two major planks in the modern interpretation of Athenian democracy: first, that it rested on a conception of the “wisdom of the multitude” akin to that advanced by epistemic democrats today, and second that it was “deliberative,” meaning that mass discussion of political matters played a defining role. The first plank rests largely on an argument made by Aristotle in support of mass political participation, which I show has been comprehensively misunderstood. The second rests on the interpretation of the verb “bouleuomai” as indicating speech, but I suggest that it meant internal reflection in both the courts and the assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • American Sectionalism in the British Mind, 1832- 1863
    ‘The Inextinguishable Struggle Between North and South,’ American Sectionalism in the British Mind, 1832- 1863 Peter O’Connor PhD 2014 ‘The Inextinguishable Struggle Between North and South,’ American Sectionalism in the British Mind, 1832- 1863 Peter O’Connor A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Northumbria for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Research undertaken in the School of Arts and Social Sciences February 2014 Abstract of Thesis Working within the field of nineteenth century transatlantic history this thesis takes as its starting point British attempts to engage with the American Civil War. It emphasizes the historiographical oversights within the current scholarship on this topic which have tended to downplay the significance of antebellum British commentators in constructing an image of the United States for their readers which was highly regionalized, and which have failed to recognize the antebellum heritage of the tropes deployed during the Civil War to describe the Union and Confederacy. Drawing on the accounts of over fifty British pre-war commentators and supplemented by the political press, monthly magazines and personal correspondence, in addition to significant amounts of Civil War propaganda this thesis contends that the understanding of the British literate classes of the conflict was part of a continuum. It equally emphasizes that by measuring the reception of texts among the literate public it is possible to ascertain the levels of British understanding of different aspects of the American nation and its sections in this period. It aims to demonstrate that any attempt to understand the conflict in a British context must adequately reflect the long-standing image of the United States as being characterized by discrete regions with particular social, cultural, economic and political identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Locke, Spinoza and the Philosophical Debate Concerning Toleration in the Early Enlightenment (C
    Locke, Spinoza and the Philosophical Debate KONINKLIJKE NEDERLANDSE AKADEMIE VAN WETENSCHAPPEN Mededelingen van de Afdeling Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks, Deel 62 no. 6 Deze Mededeling werd in verkorte vorm uitgesproken in de vergadering van de Afdeling Letterkunde, gehouden op 9 november 1998. J.I. ISRAEL Locke, Spinoza and the Philosophical Debate Concerning Toleration in the Early Enlightenment (c. 1670 - c. 1750) Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam, 1999 ISBN 90-6984-245-9 Copyright van deze uitgave © 1999 Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschap- pen, Postbus 19121, 1000 GC Amsterdam Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden verveelvoudigd en/of openbaar gemaakt door middel van druk, fotokopie, microfilm of op welke wijze dan ook, zonder voorafgaande schriftelij- ke toestemming van de rechthebbende, behoudens de uitzonderingen bij de wet gesteld Druk: Casparie Heerhugowaard bv Het papier van deze uitgave voldoet aan ∞ ISO-norm 9706 (1994) voor permanent houd- baar papier Locke, Spinoza and the Philosophical Debate The late seventeenth and early eighteenth century witnessed the decisive advance, indeed the first real triumph, of the concept of toleration in western Europe if not officially, and in law, then certainly in the intellectual sphere and in practice. In the United Provinces, beginning in the era of De Witt’s ‘True Freedom’ and continuing during the stad- holderate of William iii after 1672, religious, if not full philosophical, toleration was powerfully affirmed, expanded and in some respects, as 1 with the Anabaptists, formalized. In England, as a consequence of the Glorious Revolution of 1688-91, not only religious toleration but also free- 2 dom of the press grew appreciably.
    [Show full text]
  • Bentham, Mill, Grote, and an Analysis of the Influence of Natural Religion on the Temporal Happiness of Mankind
    chapter 4 Bentham, Mill, Grote, and An Analysis of the Influence of Natural Religion on the Temporal Happiness of Mankind Catherine Fuller † This paper investigates the production of An Analysis of the influence of natu- ral religion on the temporal happiness of mankind, first published in 1822 by George Grote, from Bentham’s manuscripts on the utility of religion. The paper undertakes a preliminary comparison between the manuscripts and the book. The basis of this comparison also includes Grote’s essay on Magic, the influ- ence of James Mill, and Bentham’s reaction to the book. It will be argued that Bentham and Grote had different agenda, and produced different texts, and that to regard Bentham as the author of An Analysis of the influence of natural religion is misleading.1 Denied the possibility of a university education by his father’s insistence that he worked in the family bank, George Grote sought all possibilities of edu- cation and debate through friendship, and in 1819 met James Mill.2 Grote soon came under Mill’s influence, and according to Harriet, Grote’s wife, “there was little difference in point of opinion between them.”3 Grote’s early essay on Magic, completed by Christmas 1820,4 was a thinly- disguised attack on religion. Mill recommended Grote and the essay to the editor of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, and recommended Grote to Bentham as an editor of his writings on the utility of religion.5 After two meetings at dinner with Grote in August and November 1821, Bentham sent four parcels 1 A version of this paper was given at the ISUS Conference held in San Francisco in September 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Historical Journal
    Issue of British Recognition of the Confederate States of America 1 The Roebuck Motion and the Issue of British Recognition of the Confederate States of America Lindsay Frederick Braun ^^7 j^ \ ith the secession of the southern states from the Union and the i U I outbreak of the American Civil War in 1861, British poHcymak- \^\^ ers and financiers had to contend with the novel diplomatic and economic difficulties of relations with two Americas locked in battle. Faced with an uncertain contest abroad and divided affinities at home, the govern- ment of Lord Palmerston chose to steer a middle course of neutrality. This did not, however, prevent advocates and detractors of both sides from orga- nizing opinion and advancing agendas across the country and even into Parliament. Debate on the situation within the warring states and sugges- tions that Britain might do weU to extend formal diplomatic recognition to the Confederate States of America as a sovereign nation, or to intervene in the conflict, appeared regularly in Parliament during the course of the war. The ill-fated Parliamentary motion towards recognition introduced in sum- mer of 1863 by John Arthur Roebuck, Member of Parliament for Sheffield, was the last of the serious attempts to secure recognition. It was, perhaps, the most telling effort of the entire war period in terms of the European diplo- matic landscape and Europe's relations to events in North America. Between the inception of Roebuck's motion in May 1863 and its with- drawal on 13 July 1863, its sponsor engaged in amateur diplomacy with the French, serious breaches of protocol, and eventually witnessed not only the obloquy of pro-Union and anti-interventionist speakers but also the desertion of other pro-Confederate members of Parliament.
    [Show full text]