1998 NGA Annual Meeting
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc. -
Chapter 2, State Executive Branch
CHAPTER TWO STATE EXECUTIVE BRANCH The Council of State Governments 23 THE GOVERNORS, 1986-87 By Thad L. Beyle Considerable interest in gubernatorial elec Rhode lsland), and Madeleine Kunin (D.Ver. tions was expressed during 1986-87, a period mont). between presidential campaign& Fint, there Thirteen incumbent governors were constitu was considerable political activity in the form tionally ineligible to seek another term: Bob of campaigning as 39 governol"8hips were con Graham (D.Florida), George Ariyoshi (D·Ha· tested. Second, as the problema 8B8OCiated with waii), John Carlin (D.Kansas), Martha Layne the federal deficit and the ideoiogicalstance of Collins (D.Kentucky), Joseph Brennan (D the Reagan administration continued, gover Maine), Harry Hughes (D.Maryland), Thney non and other state leaders made difficult deci Anaya (D.New Mexico), George Nigh CD·Okla sions on the extent of their statal' commitment homa), Victor Atiyeh (R.Oregon), Dick Thorn· to a range ofpolicy concerns. Third was the con burgh (R.Pennsylvania), Richard Riley (D. tinuing role of the governorship in producing South Carolina), William Janklow (R.South serious presidential candidates aft.er a period Dakota), and Lamar Alexander (R.Thnne68e6). in which it was believed that governors could Seven incumbents opted to retire; George no longer be considered as potential candidates Wallace (D.Alabama), Bruce Babbitt CD-Arizo for president.) Fourth was the negative publi. na), Richard Lamm (D-Colorado), John Evans city fostered by the questionable actions of (D.Idaho). William Allain (D-Mississippi), several governors. which in one case lead to an Robert Kerry CD·Nebraska), and Ed Hershler impeachment and in two others contributed to CD ·Wyoming). -
An Ambitious New Plan Offers Delta Water and Economic Hope for the San Joaquin Valley
August 12, 2020 Western Edition Volume 2, Number 30 An ambitious new plan offers Delta water and economic hope for the San Joaquin valley The San Joaquin Valley is bracing for the economic impacts to come from implementing the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act over the next 20 years. Without changes, the regulation could lead to more than a million acres of fallowing and as much as $7 billion in lost revenues every year, with the worst financial impacts rippling down to California’s most disadvantaged communities, according to a report released earlier this year. With this reality, a coalition has emerged around a complex and ambitious approach to bring water to the valley, one that could head off the A new plan takes a different approach to Delta water flows. (Photo of the Sacramento Delta, courtesy of the Department of Water worst effects of SGMA for farmers, the Resources) environment and communities. “We've already started,” said Scott Hamilton, an agricultural economist who works as a consultant for the coalition known as the Water Blueprint for the San Joaquin Valley. “But it’s a process that's going to take quite a bit of time and is fairly difficult.” During a Fresno State seminar series on water infrastructure on Tuesday, Hamilton outlined a sweeping new approach that would pull excess flows from the Delta through a fish-friendly alternative to pumping, then funnel that water through new extensions to existing canals and store it using strategic groundwater recharge projects. “None of it is cheap,” warned Hamilton. “We are now looking at around a $9-billion program for the valley.” 1 He acknowledged the success of the plan hinges on one critical leap of faith: gaining approval from environmental and social justice groups to pull more water from the Delta. -
142000 IOP.Indd
NOVEMBER 2004 New Poll Released Director’s Search Begins Justice Scalia Visits the Forum Nader Visits the Forum Skirting Tradition Released Campaign 2004 Comes to Harvard Hundreds of students attend a Debate Watch in the JFK Jr. Forum Welcome to the Institute of Politics at Harvard University P HIL S HARP , I NTERIM D IRECTOR I was thrilled to return to the Institute of Politics for the fall 2004 semes- ter while a new long-term director is recruited. As a former IOP Director (1995-1998), I jumped at the chance to return to such a special place at an important time. This summer, IOP Director Dan Glickman, Harvard students, and IOP staff went into high gear to mobilize, inspire, and engage young people in politics and the electoral process. • We hosted events for political powerbrokers during the Democratic and Republican National Conventions. • We are working to ensure all Harvard voices are heard at the polls through our dynamic and effective H-VOTE campus vote pro- gram, as well as coordinating the voter education and mobilization activities of nearly 20 other schools across America, part of our National Campaign for Political and Civic Engagement. • Our Resident Fellows this semester are an impressive group. They bring experiences from media, to managing campaigns, to the Middle East. See inside for more information on our exciting fellows. • A survey we conducted with The Chronicle of Higher Education found that most of America’s college campuses are politically active, but 33% of schools fail to meet federal requirements facili- tating voter registration opportunities for students. -
Robert D. Ray
ROBERT D. RAY Few names in Iowa’s 172-year history are as instantly recognizable as Robert D. Ray. He was born in Des Moines September 26, 1928 and passed away in Des Moines on July 8, 2018. In the intervening years, Robert D. Ray’s leadership touched the lives of generations of Iowans on dozens of fronts and reached global impact on several occasions. Ray grew up in the Drake neighborhood and met the love of his life and future wife, Billie Lee Hornberger, at what is now First Christian Church while they were students at Roosevelt High School. The Roosevelt High School sweethearts started dating in 1945 and were married on December 22, 1951. His life revolved around love of family, first as a son and brother, followed by his passion to be a devoted husband, dedicated father to the Ray’s three daughters and adoring grandfather to their eight grandchildren. After World War II, Ray served the U. S. Army in Japan. He graduated from Drake University with a business degree in 1952 and law degree 1954. He was a law and reading clerk in the Iowa State Senate, where he began to understand government and relish politics. Later, he built a successful practice as a trial lawyer with two brothers named Lawyer; the firm was Lawyer, Lawyer and Ray. In 1963, Ray was elected Iowa Republican State Chairman and became a member of the Republican National Committee. After heavy losses in the 1964 Goldwater debacle, Ray resolved to rebuild and the GOP elected three new Congressmen and 88 state legislators in 1966. -
F~ #Jr 4E4!'£'7"~#T:::S, M
F. NEWTON HUGHES IMAUGURAL SEMINAR University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta / ,. May L 1987 Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mrs. Hughes, Honorable Ministers, Dean Smith, Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen. On behalf of our contingent ON~ t"J4~~ from Colorado, mo 01 whom will be arriving later this evening, we are honored to participate in this Inaugural Seminar in honor of Mr, F. Newton Hug,es. Indeed, it is a pleasure to be here . .f~ #Jr4E4!'£'7"~#t:::S, M_ The Governor of Colorado, the Honorable Roy Romer,Aasked me to personally extend to you an invitation to visit Colorado and discuss our mutual economic objective.$ with him personally at your convenience. This invitation was extended during a conversation with the Governor at a reception for our congressional delegation in connection with the Annual Meeting of the U.S. Charrber of Commerce in Washington just this past Monday evening. In the short period of time since his inauguration in January, the Governor has launched an aggressive program to tell the world that Coloracb is "open for business", He is dedicated to getting Colorado's ecooomy back on track. Our former governor of 12 years was general 1y perceived as anti -business and earned his first election by convincing the people of Colorado to deny the winter olvmoics for Denver even after ~nver had been selected by the International Olympic Committee. At this point in the new governor's administration, we, in the business community, are quite optimistic and very supportive. My role this evening is to address you as a representative of the £Ql.Qr:_ado Association of Commerce _and Industry, our State Chamber of Commerce, rather than as a venture capitalist. -
Learning from the Leaders Welfare Reform in the Midwestern States
Chapter 1 LEARNING FROM MIDWESTERN LEADERS Carol S. Weissert Few, if any, intergovernmental programs in recent memory have received the academic, political, and public attention of the 1996 federal Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconcilia- tion Act (PRWORA), which abolished Aid to Families with Depend- ent Children (AFDC) and replaced it with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The 1996 legislation, which converted wel- fare from an entitlement program administered by the states to block grants that states can use as they see fit, has led to intense me- dia attention and legislative debate, as well as numerous studies and information sources.1 State welfare reform efforts that both preceded and emanated from the 1996 federal law are difficult to encapsulate in any one re- port or study. The difficulty lies partly in the fact that welfare re- form encompasses economic and administrative dilemmas at the national, state, and local levels, and also affects recipients in myriad ways. Many state welfare programs incorporate both conservative and liberal ideas and centralize some functions while dispersing others to local control. In so doing, they reflect the federal legislation that helped shape — if not spawn — much of the state action. One way to capture the nuances of some of this complexity — and thus to better understand the nature and potential outcomes of the experiment on which the nation has embarked—is to focus on a few key states. That is what this book does. The authors take a close 1 Learning from the Leaders: Welfare Reform and Policy in Five Midwestern States look at the political forces propelling welfare reform in Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin. -
("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary. -
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E1972 HON. RON PAUL HON. THOMAS G. TANCREDO HON. DANNY K. DAVIS HON. MICHAEL N. CA
E1972 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks September 29, 2006 and values. Not those of the enemy. In the PAYING TRIBUTE TO LAURA Diabetes Research Foundation Galas, Chil- meantime, if we continue to defile our inter- LONDONO dren’s Congress, Walk for a Cure, the fight for national agreements by blatantly disregarding stem cell research and many others. She has them, it will only mean our profile abroad will HON. THOMAS G. TANCREDO told me her stories of low and high blood sug- continue to suffer, potentially to the great det- OF COLORADO ars, she has shown me how she pricks her riment of our men and women in uniform, and IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES fingers and takes her insulin and she has al- ultimately to our goal of successfully defeating ways demonstrated a positive attitude through our enemy. Friday, September 29, 2006 it all. I would ask my colleagues, and I would ask Mr. TANCREDO. Mr. Speaker, I rise today Most of all, I am proud to call her my friend. the American people, do we really believe that to pay tribute to one of my constituents, Ms. Recently, we shared the podium at an event we must betray our moral standard in order to Laura Londono of Highlands Ranch, Colorado. at Alfred I. DuPont Hospital for Children, and defeat our enemies? We are fighting a dif- Ms. Londono has been accepted to the Peo- it is safe to say that Allie stole the show! Allie ferent enemy, one espousing a radical ide- ple to People World Leadership Forum here in is surrounded by loving parents and two won- ology and using blatant violence as a vehicle our Nation’s Capital. -
Look to the Governors— Federalism Still Lives by Karlyn H
Chapter 4 Table 1: House Vote, By Income Group 1994 1996 1998 D R D R D R Less than $15,000 60% 37% 61% 36% 57% 39% $15,000-$30,000 50 48 54 43 53 44 $30,000-$50,000 44 54 49 49 48 49 $50,000-$75,000 45 54 47 52 44 54 $75,000+ 38 61 39 59 45 52 Source: Surveys by Voter News Service. tion, health care, Social Security. The effect was predictable: or more is growing rapidly and can’t be taken for granted a significant shift in support from Republican candidates to anymore. The GOP must decide what issues will allow it to Democratic ones. That result creates a dilemma for the GOP hold onto the gains made among non-affluent voters while not as it looks ahead to the next House elections. On the one hand, losing any more ground with the affluent. whatever the causes for the GOP’s loss of support among the affluent, those same causes apparently helped Republicans The extent to which the Republicans are successful, and gain enough ground with non-affluent voters to hold onto a the extent to which the Democrats can thwart their strategy, House majority. But the voter bloc of those making $75,000 could determine who controls the House in 2000. Look to the Governors— Federalism Still Lives By Karlyn H. Bowman In his 1988 book, Laboratories of Democracy, political Eight of the country’s ten most populous states have Republi- writer David Osborne urged readers to look beyond Washing- can governors. -
House Resolution No
The Speaker, on behalf of the entire membership of the House of Representatives, offered the following resolution: House Resolution No. 363. A resolution for the Honorable Alma G. Stallworth. Whereas, It is truly an honor and a privilege to salute Alma G. Stallworth as she brings to a close a long and distinguished career of service within the Michigan House of Representatives. Indeed in the era of term limits, Alma Stallworth's tenure in the House of Representatives is unique in that it has included terms over the course of three decades. She served under the leadership of four governors: William Milliken, James Blanchard, John Engler, and Jennifer Granholm; and five Speakers of the House of Representatives: William Ryan, Gary Owen, Lou Dodak, Curtis Hertel, and Paul Hillegonds; and Whereas, Alma Stallworth was the first female appointed chair of the House Public Utilities Committee, serving twelve years and forging major changes in state energy and communications policies. This record is more than a reflection of her spirit of public service and dedication, it is a sterling tribute to the respect in which she is held by the people of her district. There could be no finer testimony of her valuable accomplishments; and Whereas, Alma Stallworth received her master's degree in Education and Health Promotion from Chelsea University in London, England. She is better prepared to serve others, particularly the youth and families within her community. Youth services to neighborhood and civic organizations have derived great benefit from her service. This commitment has been evident in all of her varied roles in the House of Representatives. -
Rr714 Sk.Indd
Research Report Report Number 714, June 2013 Sagebrush Rebellion Part II Analysis of the public lands debate in utah HIGHLIGHTS The federal government owns around 635 million acres, 1 Nearly 67% of the land in Utah is owned by the or 28% of the land comprising the United States. Within federal government, the fourth highest among all 50 states. Utah, nearly 67% of the state’s total acreage, or 35 million The Legislature passed the Transfer of Public Lands Act (TPLA) in 2012, which demands the acres, is owned by the federal government. Throughout the federal government transfer nearly 20 million acres of land by 2015. nation’s history, groups have debated who should control Supporters of the TPLA argue that when Utah became a state, the federal government this land and how it should be managed. In 2012, the promised to “extinguish title” to all federal lands within a timely manner. Because it hasn’t, it has Utah State Legislature passed H.B. 148, which demands put the state at an economic disadvantage, has hurt education funding, and manages the land the United States transfer their title to public lands to the ineffi ciently. State of Utah before December 31, 2014. Opponents of the TPLA argue that Utah agreed to “forever disclaim” all public lands when it Th is research report will explain the history of public lands in the U.S. and Utah, past became a state. They posit that the state was brought into the union under equal footing, there eff orts to transfer the land to state control, the arguments for and against keeping the are economic benefi ts to federal control of the lands under federal ownership, and assess the merits and faults of each argument.