Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 219286

Record of Site Condition Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Record of Site Condition Number 219286 Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/10/06 Certification Date 2014/06/17 Current Property Use Parkland Intended Property Use Parkland Certificate of Property Use Number 8611-95XP8 Applicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard, with Non-potable Ground Water, for Parkland property use, with RA Property Municipal Address 3885 YONGE STREET, TORONTO, ON, M4N 2P2

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 1 of 23 PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS

Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC

Owner Name CITY OF TORONTO

Authorized Person JOSIE SCIOLI

Mailing Address 204, 55 JOHN STREET, TORONTO ONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code M5V 3C6

Phone (416) 397-4156

Fax Email Address [email protected]

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 2 of 23 RSC Property Location Information

Municipal Address(es) 3885 YONGE STREET, TORONTO, ON M4N 2P2

Municipality Toronto

Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter

Assessment Roll 190808149000100 Number(s)

Property Identifier 10537-0029 (LT) Number(s)

RSC Property Geographical References

Coordinate System UTM Datum NAD 83

Zone 17

Easting 628,434.00

Northing 4,844,394.00

RSC Property Use Information

The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.

Current Property Use Parkland Intended Property Use Parkland

Certificate of Property Yes Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA

Certificate of Property 8611-95XP8 Use Number

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 3 of 23 Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 4 of 23 PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS Qualified Person's Information

Name ROBERT DAVID MCCLELLAN

Type of Licence Under Licence Professional Engineers Act

Licence Number 90360348

QP Employer Name ARCADIS CANADA INC.

Mailing Address 4005 HICKORY DRIVE, MISSISSAUGA ONTARIO, L4W 1L1 CANADA

Phone (905) 614-1978

Fax (905) 614-1981

Email Address [email protected]

Municipal Information

Local or Single-Tier Toronto Municipality

Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office

District Office Toronto District Office

District Office Address 5775 Yonge St., 8th floor, North York ON M2M 4J1

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 5 of 23 Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components (YYYY/MM/DD) of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) 2015-03-31

Type of Date of Report Author Name of Consulting Report Title Report (YYYY/MM/DD) of Report Company

P1 ESA Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Part of 3885 Yonge 2011-12-01 David FRANZ ENVIRONMENTAL Street, Toronto, ON McClellan INC.

P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Update, Part of 2015-03-31 David ARCADIS FRANZ Update 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario McClellan CANADA INC.

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment

Date of Report Author Name of Consulting Report Title (YYYY/MM/DD) of Report Company

N/A

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 6 of 23 Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation (YYYY/MM/DD) components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) 2014-06-17

Type of Date of Report Author Name of Consulting Report Title Report (YYYY/MM/DD) of Report Company

P2 ESA Phase II ESA - Proposed Parkland, Carpark 414, 3885 Yonge 2012-06-01 Eleni Girma TORONTO INSPECTION Street, Toronto ON Beyene LIMITED

P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Update Report, 2014-08-22 David FRANZ ENVIRONMENTAL Update Part of 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada McClellan INC.

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment

Date of Report Author Name of Consulting Report Title (YYYY/MM/DD) of Report Company . N/A

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 7 of 23 Environmental Condition

Section 41 applies? No

Section 43.1 applies? Yes

Site Condition Information

Certification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/06/17 Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 0.36439

Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property

Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property

Soil Texture

Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes

Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or Yes under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under Yes the property which is used in the RSC?

Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or MAXXAM ANALYTICS INC sediment

Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Non-potable

Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 9

Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2015/03/26

Risk Assessment Information

A risk assessment has been prepared and accepted by the Director in support of this Yes RSC?

Risk assessment identification number 1821-8PYKPV

Risk assessment was a site specific risk assessment completed and approved in No accordance with the Cleanup Guideline 1996?

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 8 of 23 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 1 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 2 Bromoform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

3 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls < 0.03 0.3 µg/g 5 Aldrin < 0.002 0.05 µg/g 6 Chlordane < 0.002 0.05 µg/g 7 DDD 0.004 0.05 µg/g 8 DDE 0.01 0.05 µg/g 9 DDT 0.004 1.4 µg/g 10 Dieldrin < 0.002 0.05 µg/g 11 Endosulfan < 0.002 0.04 µg/g 12 Endrin < 0.002 0.04 µg/g 13 Heptachlor < 0.002 0.05 µg/g 14 Heptachlor Epoxide < 0.002 0.05 µg/g 15 Hexachlorobenzene < 0.002 0.02 µg/g 16 Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.005 0.01 µg/g 17 Hexachlorocyclohexane Gamma- < 0.002 0.01 µg/g 18 Hexachloroethane < 0.005 0.01 µg/g 19 Methoxychlor < 0.005 0.05 µg/g 20 Antimony 0.6 1.3 µg/g 21 Arsenic 4 18 µg/g 22 Selenium 1.4 1.5 µg/g 23 Acenaphthene < 0.01 0.072 µg/g 24 Acenaphthylene < 0.005 0.093 µg/g 25 Anthracene < 0.017 0.22 µg/g 26 Benz[a]anthracene 0.07 0.36 µg/g 27 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.073 0.3 µg/g 28 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.12 0.47 µg/g 29 Benzo[ghi]perylene 0.04 0.68 µg/g 30 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.04 0.48 µg/g 31 Chrysene 0.07 2.8 µg/g 32 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.02 0.1 µg/g 33 Fluoranthene 0.2 0.69 µg/g 34 Fluorene 0.007 0.19 µg/g 35 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene 0.04 0.23 µg/g

...Continued on next page

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 9 of 23 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

Continued from previous page....

Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 36 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** 0.016 0.59 µg/g 37 Naphthalene < 0.005 0.09 µg/g 38 Phenanthrene 0.13 0.69 µg/g 39 Pyrene 0.15 1 µg/g 40 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 10 25 µg/g 41 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 10 10 µg/g 42 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 50 240 µg/g 43 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 50 120 µg/g 44 Benzene < 0.02 0.02 µg/g 45 Ethylbenzene < 0.02 0.05 µg/g 46 Toluene 0.043 0.2 µg/g 47 Xylene Mixture < 0.02 0.05 µg/g 48 Acetone < 0.1 0.5 µg/g 49 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 50 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 51 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 52 Chloroform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 53 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 54 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 55 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 56 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 57 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 58 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 59 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

60 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 61 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

62 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 63 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.03 0.05 µg/g 64 Ethylene dibromide < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 65 Hexane (n) < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 66 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g

67 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g 68 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 69 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 70 Styrene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

...Continued on next page

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 10 of 23 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

Continued from previous page....

Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 71 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 72 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 73 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

74 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 75 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 76 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 77 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 0.25 µg/g 78 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.02 µg/g 79 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* 0.58 1.5 µg/g 80 Chromium VI < 0.2 0.66 µg/g 81 Cyanide (CN-) 0.04 0.051 µg/g 82 Mercury 0.076 0.27 µg/g 83 Barium 130 220 µg/g 84 Beryllium 0.82 2.5 µg/g 85 Boron (total) < 5 36 µg/g 86 Cadmium 0.27 1.2 µg/g 87 Chromium Total 24 70 µg/g 88 Cobalt 10 22 µg/g 89 Copper 22 92 µg/g 90 Lead 21 120 µg/g 91 Molybdenum < 0.5 2 µg/g 92 Nickel 21 82 µg/g 93 Silver < 0.2 0.5 µg/g 94 Thallium 0.16 1 µg/g 95 Uranium 0.63 2.5 µg/g 96 Vanadium 37 86 µg/g 97 Zinc 81 290 µg/g

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 11 of 23 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 1 Bromodichloromethane < 0.5 67000 µg/L 2 Bromoform < 1 380 µg/L

3 Dibromochloromethane < 0.5 65000 µg/L 4 Chloride 570,000 1800000 µg/L 5 Chromium VI < 5 110 µg/L 6 Mercury < 0.01 0.29 µg/L 7 Acenaphthene < 0.05 600 µg/L

8 Acenaphthylene < 0.05 1.4 µg/L 9 Anthracene < 0.05 1 µg/L 10 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.05 1.8 µg/L 11 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.01 0.81 µg/L 12 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.75 µg/L 13 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.05 0.2 µg/L 14 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.4 µg/L 15 Chrysene < 0.05 0.7 µg/L 16 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.05 0.4 µg/L 17 Fluoranthene < 0.05 73 µg/L 18 Fluorene < 0.05 290 µg/L 19 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.05 0.2 µg/L 20 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.05 1500 µg/L 21 Naphthalene < 0.05 1400 µg/L 22 Phenanthrene < 0.03 380 µg/L 23 Pyrene < 0.05 5.7 µg/L 24 Sodium 1,700,000 1800000 µg/L 25 Antimony 0.7 16000 µg/L 26 Arsenic 23 1500 µg/L 27 Selenium < 2 50 µg/L 28 Barium 700 23000 µg/L 29 Beryllium < 0.5 53 µg/L 30 Boron (total) 110 36000 µg/L 31 Cadmium < 0.1 2.1 µg/L 32 Chromium Total < 5 640 µg/L 33 Cobalt 1.6 52 µg/L 34 Copper 1 69 µg/L 35 Lead 4.1 20 µg/L

...Continued on next page

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 12 of 23 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

Continued from previous page....

Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 36 Molybdenum 9 7300 µg/L 37 Nickel < 5 390 µg/L 38 Silver < 0.1 1.2 µg/L 39 Thallium 0.14 400 µg/L 40 Uranium 1.9 330 µg/L 41 Vanadium 6 200 µg/L 42 Zinc 5 890 µg/L 43 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 100 420 µg/L 44 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L 45 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 130 500 µg/L 46 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 100 500 µg/L 47 Benzene < 0.2 44 µg/L 48 Ethylbenzene < 0.2 1800 µg/L 49 Toluene < 0.4 14000 µg/L 50 Xylene Mixture 0.3 3300 µg/L 51 Acetone < 20 100000 µg/L 52 Bromomethane < 1 5.6 µg/L 53 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.79 µg/L 54 Chlorobenzene < 0.2 500 µg/L 55 Chloroform < 0.2 2.4 µg/L 56 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.5 4600 µg/L 57 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.5 7600 µg/L 58 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.5 8 µg/L 59 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 1 3500 µg/L

60 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.2 320 µg/L 61 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

62 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L 63 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L 64 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L 65 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.2 16 µg/L 66 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.4 5.2 µg/L

67 Ethylene dibromide < 0.2 0.25 µg/L 68 Hexane (n) < 1 51 µg/L 69 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 10 470000 µg/L 70 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 10 140000 µg/L

...Continued on next page

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 13 of 23 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

Continued from previous page....

Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 71 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.5 190 µg/L 72 Methylene Chloride < 2 610 µg/L 73 Styrene < 0.5 1300 µg/L

74 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.5 3.3 µg/L 75 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.5 3.2 µg/L 76 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.2 1.6 µg/L 77 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.2 640 µg/L 78 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.5 4.7 µg/L 79 Trichloroethylene < 0.2 1.6 µg/L 80 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.5 2000 µg/L 81 Vinyl Chloride < 0.4 0.5 µg/L

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 14 of 23 See the attached “Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment” for standards specified in a risk assessment and comparison to maximum concentrations measured on, in or under the RSC property.

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 15 of 23 Remedial Action and Mitigation

Remediated Soils

Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Soil Remediation Process (in-ground volume in m³)

No remediation 0.0

Description of Remediation

Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.

No remediation undertaken. Risk management measures implemented per CPU 8611-95XP8

Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned

Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0

Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0

Soil Brought to the Property

Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property 930.0 (in-ground volume in m³)

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 16 of 23 Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures

Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.

None

Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.

None

Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres) 0.0

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 17 of 23 Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures

Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

A hard cap consisting of a minimum of 75 mm asphalt or concrete followed by 150 mm of Granular "A". A soil cap barrier consisting of the following: i. In landscaped areas with shallow rooting plants having a rooting depth no greater than 0.30 metres, a minimum depth of 0.30 m of soil meeting the lower of the generic standards in Tables 7 and 9 for the Residential/ Parkland/ Institutional/ Commercial/ Community Property Use Standards of the Soil, Ground water and Sediment Standards for Use under Part X\1.1 of the Act published by the Ministry and dated April 15, 2011; and/or ii. In landscaped areas with deep rooting vegetation having a rooting depth of no greater than 1.5 metres, a minimum depth of soil at least 10 centimetres below the deepest root penetration depth of the vegetation and meeting the lower of the generic standards in Tables 7 and 9 for the Residential/ Parkland/ Institutional/ Commercial/ Community Property Use Standards of the Soil, Ground water and Sediment Standards for Use under Part X\1.1 of the Act published by the Ministry and dated April 15, 2011;

Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

Monitoring or Maintenance

Soil Management Measures

Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

An inspection and maintenance program shall be prepared and implemented to ensure the continuing integrity of the hard cap and/or soil cap barriers as long as the Contaminants of Concern are present on the Property. The inspection program shall include, at a minimum, semiannual (spring and fall) inspections of the exterior barrier integrity. Any barrier deficiencies shall be repaired forthwith. Inspection, deficiencies and repairs shall be recorded in a log book maintained by the Owner and made available upon request by the Ministry. A soil management plan shall be prepared for the Property and implemented during any activities potentially coming in contact with or exposing site soils and ground water. A copy of the plan shall be kept by the Owner and made available for review by the Ministry upon request. Implementation of the plan shall be overseen by a Qualified Person and comply with the requirements of sections 30 to 39 of Schedule "E" of 0. Reg. 153/04 as amended and shall include, but not be limited to, provisions for soils excavation, stockpiling, characterization, disposal and record keeping specified below: a) Dust control measures and prevention of soil tracking by vehicles and personnel from the Property, including wetting of soil with potable water, reduced speeds for on-site vehicles, tire washing stations and restricting working areas in high wind conditions; b) Management of excavated materials including cleaning equipment, placement of materials for stockpiling on designated areas lined and covered with polyethylene sheeting, bermed and fenced to prevent access, runoff control to minimize contact and provisions for discharge to sanitary sewers or other approved treatment; c) Characterization of excavated soil to determine if soil exceeds the Property Specific Standards and requires off-site disposal in accordance with the provisions of 0. Reg. 347, as amended, made under the Act; d) Sampling of soil to be received at the Property shall be undertaken in accordance with Section 34 of Schedule "E" of 0. Reg. 153/04; and e) Record keeping including dates and duration of work, weather and site conditions, location and depth of excavation activities, dust control measures, stockpile management and drainage, soil characterization results, names of the Qualified Person, contractors, haulers and receiving sites for any soil or contaminated ground water removed from the Property and any complaints received relating to site activities potentially coming in contact with or exposing site soils and groundwater.

Ground Water Management Measures

Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

A soil management plan shall be prepared for the Property and implemented during any activities potentially coming in contact with or exposing site soils and ground water. A copy of the plan shall be kept by the Owner and made available for review by the Ministry upon request. Implementation of the plan shall be overseen by a Qualified Person and comply with the requirements of sections 30 to Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 18 of 23 A soil management plan shall be prepared for the Property and implemented during any activities potentially coming in contact with or exposing site soils and ground water. A copy of the plan shall be kept by the Owner and made available for review by the Ministry upon request. Implementation of the plan shall be overseen by a Qualified Person and comply with the requirements of sections 30 to 39 of Schedule "E" of 0. Reg. 153/04 as amended and shall include, but not be limited to, provisions for soils excavation, stockpiling, characterization, disposal and record keeping specified below: a) Dust control measures and prevention of soil tracking by vehicles and personnel from the Property, including wetting of soil with potable water, reduced speeds for on-site vehicles, tire washing stations and restricting working areas in high wind conditions; b) Management of excavated materials including cleaning equipment, placement of materials for stockpiling on designated areas lined and covered with polyethylene sheeting, bermed and fenced to prevent access, runoff control to minimize contact and provisions for discharge to sanitary sewers or other approved treatment; c) Characterization of excavated soil to determine if soil exceeds the Property Specific Standards and requires off-site disposal in accordance with the provisions of 0. Reg. 347, as amended, made under the Act; d) Sampling of soil to be received at the Property shall be undertaken in accordance with Section 34 of Schedule "E" of 0. Reg. 153/04; and e) Record keeping including dates and duration of work, weather and site conditions, location and depth of excavation activities, dust control measures, stockpile management and drainage, soil characterization results, names of the Qualified Person, contractors, haulers and receiving sites for any soil or contaminated ground water removed from the Property and any complaints received relating to site activities potentially coming in contact with or exposing site soils and groundwater.

Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary

Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC No property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 19 of 23 Qualified Person’s Statements and Certifications

As the qualified person, I certify that:

A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary. As of 2014/06/17, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC. Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located. As of 2014/06/17, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment. As of 2014/06/17, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.

In relation to any contaminant excepted from the certification mentioned above as specified in the RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment, or in relation to any other contaminant that in my opinion is likely to cause an adverse effect:

A risk assessment was prepared for the contaminant with respect to the property for which the phase two environmental site assessment was conducted. The Director has accepted the risk assessment under clause 168.5 (1) (a) of the Act.

As of 2014/06/17, the property for which the phase two environmental site assessment was conducted meets the standards specified in the risk assessment for the contaminant.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry. The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location. I do not hold and have not held and my employer ARCADIS CANADA INC. does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2014/06/17. By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, ROBERT DAVID MCCLELLAN, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/08/24: Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 20 of 23 By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, ROBERT DAVID MCCLELLAN, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/08/24:

a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.

I Agree

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 21 of 23 Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or Agent

The following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change as part of the record of site condition

Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired

A Current plan of Survey

Property Specific Standards

Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model

Owner or agent certification statements

6.1.2

Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 22 of 23 Filed Record of Site Condition # 219286 on 2015/10/06 23 of 23 Anna Kinasto.sski, BA., LL.B., LEE: ndLToHONTO Sm. 1260, 26 Fir.. \iefto Hail Toronto ON M5V 3C6 Tel. (416) 392 -‘U47 Fax (416) 397-5624 * Certified by the Law Society as a Specialist in Municipal Law: Local Government/Land Use Planning & Development

Reply To: Soo Kim Iee File No. 5iJ00R’2Qi8.O4 Tel: (416) 392-1236 Reference: 3)05284 FaN: (416) 397-5623 E-Niail; sIee1,toron(o.ca October27, 2014

Ministry of the Environment Operations Division Floor 12A 2 St. flair Avenue West Toronto, Ontario M4V 1L5

Attention: Sridhar Sangaraju, Director

Re: Risk Assessment Pre-submission Part of 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto Reference Number 182 1-8PYKPV

Further to your letter of October 7, 2014 addressed to Mr. Lome Persiko, I act for Toronto Parking Authority, a City Board that operates municipal parking facilities for the City of Toronto. As requested in your letter, please be advised as follows:

1. Legal Description for the “Risk Assessment’ lands: Part of Lot 21, Plan 246 and Part of Lot 10, East of Yonge Street, designated as Parts 2, 5 and 6 on Plan 66R-26030, City of Toronto, being part of PIN 10537-0029 (LT).

2. Rezistered Owner: City of Toronto.

3. Address for Notice: c/o Ms. Josie Scioli. Chief Corporate Officer City of Toronto Metro Hall, 55 John Street, Suite 204 Toronto, Ontario M5V 3C6

4. Municipal Address: Part of 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto

5. Assessment Roll Number: Part of 190808149000100

6. Property Identification Number: Part of PIN 10537-0029 (LT)

Yours truly,

Soo Kim Lee (Ms.) Solicitor

PHASE ONE ESA PROPERTY BOUNDARY PHASE TWO ESA PROPERTY BOUNDARY RA PROPERTY BOUNDARY RSC PROPERTY BOUNDARY OUTLINED IN RED Layout: (Author: mzarei) (Author: Layout: {AD\mzarei} V:\ESRI\2218_TO_ParkingAuth_3885Yonge\1301_RSC\PlanofSurvey_120305.mxd Table 2: Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment Number: RA1234-12

Table 2: Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment Number 1234-12 Applicable Site Condition Standard lowest of Tables 7 and 9

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Contaminant Measurement type Measured Concentration Standard Specified in Risk Assessment Unit of Measurement Electrical Conductivity (mS/cm) Measured 4.3 4.3 mS/cm Sodium Adsorption Ratio Measured 34 34 Unitless

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground Water Contaminant Measurement type Measured Concentration Standard Specified in Risk Assessment Unit of Measurement

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Sediment Contaminant Measurement type Measured Concentration Standard Specified in Risk Assessment Unit of Measurement

1 of 2 Table 2: Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment Number: RA1234-12

2 of 2 “TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN” (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04) Part of 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto Ontario Area of Location of Area of Potentially Contaminating Activity2 Location of Contaminants Media Potential Potential Environmental PCA (on-site of Potential Potentially Environmental Concern on Phase One or off-site) Concern3 Impacted Concern1 Property (Ground water, soil and/or sediment) Fill of unknown origin has been placed along West Don River and used to grade the APEC 1: parking lot [PCA #30. Importation of fill material of unknown quality] Soil and/or Potential Across the entire site. Metals, PAHs, On-site Ground unknown fill inorganics Deposition of river sediment during flood events (e.g. Hurricane Hazel) [no applicable Water quality on site PCA number] Application of road salt for ice control [PCA #48. Salt Manufacturing, Processing and Metals and Bulk Storage] inorganics, Soil and/or APEC 2: SAR, EC, F1- Across the entire site On-site Ground Parking lot Spills and leaks of oils and related automotive fluids and metal oxides from vehicles F4 PHC, Water [PCA #52. Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles and BTEX, VOCs, material used to maintain transportation systems] PAHs Historical aerial photographs suggest the Phase I property was cleared of trees in the APEC 3: 1940s and 1950s and was possibly under agricultural land use. Use of pesticides on such Possible Across the entire site lands for weed control is considered unlikely but cannot be precluded. [PCA #40. On-site Pesticides Soil application of Pesticides (including Herbicides, Fungicides and Anti-Fouling Agents) Manufacturing, pesticides Processing, Bulk Storage and Large-Scale Applications] BTEX, F1-F4 Soil and/or APEC 4: Along the western side Potential for contaminated soil from subway construction and possible use of the site as a PHC, PAH, On-Site Ground TTC Subway of the Site staging area during subway construction [no applicable PCA number] Metals and Water inorganics Soil and/or APEC 5: Along the eastern VOCs, metals, Potential for leakage from the sanitary sewer main [no applicable PCA number] Off-site Ground Sanitary Sewer property boundary PAHs. Water Migration on to the site from off-site sources to the south and west of the site Jolly Miller Tavern – Former potential use of heating oil and coal [PCA #28 Gasoline APEC 6: and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks] Impacts to south and west Soil and/or Western property 3900 Yonge Street – potential storage of fuel for back-up generator [PCA #28 Gasoline F1 to F4 PHC, property Off-site Ground boundary and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks] metals, PAHs boundaries Water from adjacent 4000 Yonge Street – Former potential use of heating oil; potential storage of fuel for off-site PACs back-up generator [PCA #28 Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks]

Area of Location of Area of Potentially Contaminating Activity2 Location of Contaminants Media Potential Potential Environmental PCA (on-site of Potential Potentially Environmental Concern on Phase One or off-site) Concern3 Impacted Concern1 Property (Ground water, soil and/or sediment) APEC 7: Impacts to south and west Soil and/or Retail Gasoline and Service Station at 4021 Yonge Street [PCA #28 Gasoline and BTEX property North property line Off-site Ground Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks] F1 to F4 PHC boundaries Water from nearby off-site PAC

Notes: 1 - Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present, as determined through the phase one environmental site assessment, including through, (a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and (b) identification of potentially contaminating activity. 2 - Potentially Contaminating Activity means a use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a phase one study area. 3 - When completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the "Protocol for in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below: ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical Conductivity SAR CPs PAHs As, Sb, Se Cr (VI) 1,4- Dioxane THMs Na Hg Dioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B-HWS Methyl Mercury OCs BTEX Cl- high pH PHCs Ca, Mg CN- low pH 4 - When submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached. **Cette publication hautement spécialisée n’est disponible qu’en anglais en vertu du règlement 671/92, qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en francais, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère de l’Environnement au 1)800)461)6290

TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04) Part of 5 Eireann Quay, Toronto Ontario Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use1 Other Observations from Aerial Property Use Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, etc. Site contained multiple parts owned by different entities at different times, owners were:

Joseph S. Pratt George S. Pratt Agriculture or other Aerial photographs from 1939 to 1984 show the property 1886 – 1949 York Mills Development Company Vacant use as cleared vacant land. Limited Oliver H. Pratt John Rankin David B. Birrell Francis M. McEVoy Louis Fox Site contained multiple parts owned by different entities at different times, owners were:

New Jolly Miller Hotel Agriculture or other Aerial photographs from 1939 to 1984 show the property 1949 to 1963 Vacant Louis Rapp and Samuel Rich use as cleared vacant land. Dorian Investments Eva M. Mitchell James J. Walsh Marshall P. Robinson Eugene Boccia, Ernest Boccia, Vincent Agriculture or other Aerial photographs from 1939 to 1984 show the property 1963 to 1968 Vacant Demarco, use as cleared vacant land. Eugene Boccia, Ernest Boccia, Alkay Agriculture or other Aerial photographs from 1939 to 1984 show the property 1968 to 1997 Construction Limited – name change to: Vacant use as cleared vacant land. Catalice Properties Inc. City of Toronto The aerial photograph from 1998 shows the property Commercial Land 1997 to 2013 (formerly the Corporation of the City of Parking Lot being used as a parking lot. This use has continued until Use North York) the property was redeveloped as parkland in 2013. The Property was redeveloped from a parking lot in to 2013 to present City of Toronto Park Parkland Land Use parkland in 2013 and early 2014. Park use began in summer 2014. Notes: 1 - for each owner, specify one of the following types of property use (as defined in O.Reg. 153/04) that applies: Agriculture or other use Commercial use Community use Industrial use Institutional use Parkland use Residential use 2 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached **Cette publication hautement spécialisée n’est disponible qu’en anglais en vertu du règlement 671/92, qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en francais, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère de l’Environnement au 1)800)461)6290

PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL PART OF 3885 YONGE STREET TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA

Prepared for:

Toronto Parking Authority 33 Queen Street East Toronto, ON M5C 1R5

Prepared by:

FRANZ Environmental Inc. 4005 Hickory Drive Mississauga, ON, Canada L4W 1L1

FRANZ Project No. 2218-1101 Adam Dawe, P.Geo. August 22, 2014 David McClellan, M.Sc, P.Eng, QPESA, QPRA

4005 Hickory Drive, Mississauga, Ontario L4W 1L1 Tel (905) 614-1978 Fax (905) 614-1981 Offices in Mississauga, Ottawa, Montreal, Calgary, Vancouver, and Victoria PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Part of 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario

Provide, Potentially contaminating activities at the Phase Two property i. a description and assessment of, were identified by the FRANZ (2011) Phase One ESA. On-site a. areas where potentially contaminating PCAs which may have affected the site are shown on Figure 6.3 activity has occurred, and include:  The site appears to have been graded. It is possible that fill materials may have been imported to the site at some point during or prior to parking lot construction. The potential presence of fill material of unknown quality on the site represents a PCA under O.Reg 153/04 (as amended);  Contaminated sediment deposition may have occurred when a significant flood condition occurred during Hurricane Hazel. Use of the property as a parking lot and application of road salt for ice control within the parking lot all may have resulted in impacts by PHCs, VOCs, metals, SAR and EC in shallow soil;  Application of pesticides when the site was used for agricultural purposes may have impacted shallow soils with pesticides;  The TTC easement across a portion of the Phase Two Property represents a possible source of metal, PHC and PAH impact;  The sewer easement which passes through a portion of the Phase Two Property represents a possible source of metal, VOC, and PAH impact;  Off-site fuel storage to the west, motor vehicle fuel storage and handling to the north may have impacted the site with PHCs;

Ref: 2218-1101 August 22, 2014 Page 2 of 6 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Part of 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario

b. areas of potential environmental concern, The presence of these potentially contaminating activities on the and Phase Two property and within 250 m resulted in the identification of the following areas of potential environmental concern at the Phase Two Property (Figure 6.3). APEC 1: Potential unknown fill quality on site (metals and VOCs) APEC 2: Parking lot (metals, VOCs, EC, SAR) APEC 3: Possible application of pesticides (pesticides) – Phase Two Investigations have shown this APEC/pathway combination to be incomplete APEC 4: TTC Subway (metals, VOCs, PAHs) – Phase Two Investigations have shown this APEC/pathway to be inactive APEC 5: Sanitary Sewer (metals, VOCs, PAHs) – Phase Two Investigations have shown this APEC/pathway to be inactive APEC 6: Impacts to south and west property boundaries from adjacent off-site PCAs (PHCs) – Phase Two Investigations have shown this APEC/pathway to be inactive APEC 7: Impacts to south and west property boundaries from nearby off-site PCA (PHCs) – Phase Two Investigations have shown this APEC/pathway to be inactive

c. any subsurface structures and utilities on, Underground structures in the vicinity of the Phase Two property in or under the phase two property that that may affect contaminant distribution include the TTC subway may affect contaminant distribution and which is present under parts of the western property boundary, a transport, sanitary sewer line along the eastern property boundary, and shallow underground electrical lines. The location of these structures are shown on Figures 6.1 to 6.3).

While these features represent potential preferential pathways, they are not expected to have an effect on contaminant distribution at the Site since no ground water impacts have identified and contaminants in soil which have been identified are not present in the liquid state.

ii. a description of and, as appropriate, figures The Phase Two Property is bounded on the west by a parking illustrating, the physical setting of the phase lot, and to the north, east and south by park land (Figure 6.3). two property and any areas under it including, The Property was most recently a parking lot but has recently been redeveloped as a park (Figures 4.4 and 6.3).

a. stratigraphy from ground surface to the As shown in Figures 6.1 and 6.2, stratigraphy at the site now deepest aquifer or aquitard investigated, comprises a fill or hard cap overlying fill which is underlain by alluvial sands and gravel.

Ref: 2218-1101 August 22, 2014 Page 3 of 6 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Part of 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario

b. hydrogeological characteristics, including The site is underlain by fill followed by sand and gravel alluvial aquifers, aquitards and, in each deposits to the maximum depth of investigation (~11 m). The hydrostratigraphic unit where one or more alluvial deposit is not used as a potable aquifer. EC and SAR contaminants is present at concentrations impacted soils are present from below the fill and hard cap layers above the applicable site condition to depths of up to 10.7 m below grade. standards, lateral and vertical gradients, The lateral gradient is approximately 0.011 m/m and ground water flow is towards the West Don River (Figure 6.3). Vertical gradients are estimated to be approximately 0.068 in a downward direction between shallow monitoring well BH8 (screen 3.0 – 6.0 m) and deep monitoring well BH5 (screen 6.0 – 9.0 m).

c. approximate depth to bedrock, Bedrock reportedly is present at approximately 28 m below grade.

d. approximate depth to water table, Ground water occurs at depths of 2 to 3 m below grade.

e. any respect in which section 41 or 43.1 of The Phase Two Property: the regulation applies to the property, (i) is not within an area of natural significance, (ii) does not include and is not adjacent to an area of natural significance or part of such an area, (iii) includes land that is within 30 metres of an area of natural significance or part of such an area; (iv) is not a shallow soil property; Soil at the property has a pH value: (i) for surface soil, that is between 5 and 9; (ii) for sub-surface soil, that is between 5 and 11;

The qualified person is of the opinion that, given the characteristics of the Property and the certifications the qualified person would be required to make in a record of site condition in relation to the Property, the Table 3 SCSs are not applicable to this site. The MOE Table 9 SCSs are applicable to the property.

f. areas where soil has been brought from Previously, soil was brought to the site and placed on top of another property and placed on, in or under native soils to depths of up to 2.59 m below the current grade. the phase two property, and During the most recent Phase Two ESA Update investigations, soil was brought to the site to construct the fill cap and was placed from grade to depths of up to 30 to 40 cm below grade.

g. approximate locations, if known, of any No buildings are present on-site. Landscape features are shown proposed buildings and other structures, on Figure 4.4. iii. where a contaminant is present on, in or under the phase two property at a concentration greater than the applicable site condition standard, identification of,

Ref: 2218-1101 August 22, 2014 Page 4 of 6 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Part of 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario

a. each area where a contaminant is present Contaminants including EC and SAR have been identified in soil on, in or under the phase two property at a at the Phase Two property in excess of the MOE Table 9 SCSs. concentration greater than the applicable No COCs were identified in ground water at the Phase Two site condition standard, property in excess of the MOE Table 9 SCSs.

EC and SAR impacts in soil are present across the entire Phase Two property at depths greater than 0.30 m in areas where there is no hard cap, and at depths greater than 0.225 m where a hard cap is present. EC and SAR impacts extend to depths of approximately 10.7 m below grade. The distribution of EC and SAR impacts at the Phase Two property is shown on Figures 6.1, 6.2 and 6.4. b. the contaminants associated with each of Contaminants of concern associated with the area described the areas referred to in subparagraph A, above are EC and SAR.

c. each medium in which a contaminant EC and SAR contamination was identified only in soil. No COCs associated with an area referred to in were identified in ground water at the Phase Two Property. subparagraph is present,

d. a description and assessment of what is EC and SAR impacts in soils are likely a result of application of known about each of the areas referred to road salt for de-icing purposes during the previous use of the in subparagraph A, Phase Two Property as a parking lot. EC and SAR are laterally and vertically distributed across the entire Phase Two Property. EC and SAR impacted soil have been covered with either fill or hard capped surfaces and are no longer accessible to receptors.

e. the distribution, in each of the areas The distribution of EC and SAR impacted soils on the Phase Two referred to in subparagraph A, of each Property are shown in Figures 6.1, 6.2 and 6.4. EC and SAR contaminant present in the area at a impacted soil is present across the site at depths ranging from concentration greater than the applicable 0.3 to 10.7 m below grade. No EC or SAR impacts were identified site condition standard, for each medium in in ground water. which the contaminant is present, together with figures showing the distribution,

f. anything known about the reason for the EC and SAR impacts in soils are likely a result of the application discharge of the contaminants present on, of road salt for de-icing purposes during the previous use of the in or under the phase two property at a Phase Two Property as a parking lot. concentration greater than the applicable site condition standard into the natural environment,

g. anything known about migration of the EC and SAR impacts are present in soils at the Site and do not contaminants present on, in or under the appear to be migrating off-site as no ground water impacts were phase two property at a concentration identified. Due to the absence of dissolved phase contaminants, greater than the applicable site condition underground utilities/structures at the Phase Two Property standard away from any area of potential including the TTC Subway, a sanitary sewer, and buried electrical environmental concern, including the lines are not expected to act as preferential migration pathways identification of any preferential pathways, for contaminant movement.

Ref: 2218-1101 August 22, 2014 Page 5 of 6 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Part of 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario

h. climatic or meteorological conditions that Ground water elevations at the site are expected to fluctuate with may have influenced distribution and seasonal precipitation trends, however these fluctuations are not migration of the contaminants, such as expected to affect the distribution or migration of contamination temporal fluctuations in ground water since contaminants have not been identified in ground water. levels, and

i. if applicable, information concerning soil EC and SAR are not volatile contaminants, no volatile vapour intrusion of the contaminants into contaminants have been identified, and there are no enclosed buildings including, buildings are present at the Phase Two Property. Vapour 1. relevant construction features of a intrusion is not a concern at this site. building, such as a basement or crawl space, 2. building heating, ventilating and air conditioning design and operation, and 3. subsurface utilities,

iv. where contaminants on, in or under the phase two property are present at concentrations greater than the applicable site condition standard, one or more cross-sections showing,

a. the lateral and vertical distribution of a The lateral and vertical distribution of EC and SAR are presented contaminant in each area where the in Figures 6.1, 6.2 and 6.4. EC and SAR concentrations which contaminants is present at concentrations exceed the MOE Table 9 SCSs occur below the fill and hard caps greater than the applicable site condition and satisfy the respective PSSs established for the site. EC and standard in soil, ground water and SAR concentrations in shallow fill cap materials satisfy the MOE sediment, Table 9 SCSs.

b. approximate depth to water table in each The depth to water is shown in Figures 6.1 and 6.2 and ranges area referred to in subparagraph A, from 2 to 3 m below grade.

c. stratigraphy from ground surface to the As shown in Figures 6.1 and 6.2, stratigraphy at the site now deepest aquifer or aquitard investigated, comprises a fill or hard cap overlying fill which is underlain by and alluvial sands and gravel.

d. any subsurface structures and utilities that Underground structures in the vicinity of the Phase Two property may affect contaminant distribution and that may affect contaminant distribution include the TTC subway transport in each area referred to in which is present under parts of the western property boundary, a subparagraph A, and sanitary sewer line along the eastern property boundary, and shallow underground electrical lines. The location of these structures are shown on Figures 6.1 to to 6.4).

v. for each areas where a contaminant is present The relationship between identified contaminants, receptors, and on, in or under the property at a concentration the associated pathways is presented in Figure 6.5.

Ref: 2218-1101 August 22, 2014 Page 6 of 6 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Part of 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario

greater than the applicable site condition standard for the contaminant, a diagram identifying, with narrative explanatory notes,

a. the release mechanisms, EC and SAR are believed to be present in soil at the Phase Two Property as a result of the use of salt for ice control during the previous use of the Phase Two Property as a parking lot

b. contaminant transport pathway, EC and SAR are present in soil due to dissolution of salt in infiltrating ground water.

c. the human and ecological receptors On-site receptors now include park users (adults, children), small located on, in or under the phase two mammals, birds, soil organisms and plants. property,

d. receptor exposure points, and In the absence of the fill and hard cap RMMs, receptors could contact EC and SAR in site soils. However, with the presence of the fill and hard cap RMMs, there is no active exposure point for contact with the receptors.

e. routes of exposure. In the absence of the fill and hard cap RMMs:  humans could be exposed via ingestion of impacted soils, inhalation of impacted soil particles, and direct contact with impacted soils  mammals and birds could be exposed via ingestion of impacted soils, inhalation of impacted soil particles, and dermal contact with impacted soils  soil organisms could be exposed via ingestion of impacted soils, and direct contact with impacted soils  plants could be exposed via direct contact with impacted soils The presence of the fill and hard cap RMMs effectively eliminates potential exposure routes

Ref: 2218-1101 August 22, 2014 Page 7 of 6 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Part of 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario

TABLES

Ref: 2218-1101 August 22, 2014 “TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN” (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04) Part of 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto Ontario Area of Location of Area of Potentially Contaminating Activity2 Location of Contaminants Media Potential Potential Environmental PCA (on-site of Potential Potentially Environmental Concern on Phase One or off-site) Concern3 Impacted Concern1 Property (Ground water, soil and/or sediment) Fill of unknown origin has been placed along West Don River and used to grade the APEC 1: parking lot [PCA #30. Importation of fill material of unknown quality] Soil and/or Potential Across the entire site. Metals, PAHs, On-site Ground unknown fill inorganics Deposition of river sediment during flood events (e.g. Hurricane Hazel) [no applicable Water quality on site PCA number] Application of road salt for ice control [PCA #48. Salt Manufacturing, Processing and Metals and Bulk Storage] inorganics, Soil and/or APEC 2: SAR, EC, F1- Across the entire site On-site Ground Parking lot Spills and leaks of oils and related automotive fluids and metal oxides from vehicles F4 PHC, Water [PCA #52. Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles and BTEX, VOCs, material used to maintain transportation systems] PAHs Historical aerial photographs suggest the Phase I property was cleared of trees in the APEC 3: 1940s and 1950s and was possibly under agricultural land use. Use of pesticides on such Possible Across the entire site lands for weed control is considered unlikely but cannot be precluded. [PCA #40. On-site Pesticides Soil application of Pesticides (including Herbicides, Fungicides and Anti-Fouling Agents) Manufacturing, pesticides Processing, Bulk Storage and Large-Scale Applications] BTEX, F1-F4 Soil and/or APEC 4: Along the western side Potential for contaminated soil from subway construction and possible use of the site as a PHC, PAH, On-Site Ground TTC Subway of the Site staging area during subway construction [no applicable PCA number] Metals and Water inorganics Soil and/or APEC 5: Along the eastern VOCs, metals, Potential for leakage from the sanitary sewer main [no applicable PCA number] Off-site Ground Sanitary Sewer property boundary PAHs. Water Migration on to the site from off-site sources to the south and west of the site Jolly Miller Tavern – Former potential use of heating oil and coal [PCA #28 Gasoline APEC 6: and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks] Impacts to south and west Soil and/or Western property 3900 Yonge Street – potential storage of fuel for back-up generator [PCA #28 Gasoline F1 to F4 PHC, property Off-site Ground boundary and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks] metals, PAHs boundaries Water from adjacent 4000 Yonge Street – Former potential use of heating oil; potential storage of fuel for off-site PACs back-up generator [PCA #28 Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks]

PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Part of 3885 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario

FIGURES

Ref: 2218-1101 August 22, 2014 µ

DON

RIVER YORK MILLS RD

PHASE TWO PROPERTY

YONGE ST

WILSON AVE

Legend Title: PHASE TWO PROPERTY - Phase Two Property Boundary Project: PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT UPDATE 3885 YONGE ST., TORONTO, ON Client: TORONTO PARKING AUTHORITY Date: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., July 2014 Updated: NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri 1:25,000 China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), 200 100 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Aug. 22, 2014

Metres FIGURE 2.1 2218-1101-ESAII_update/AD/MZ/SiteLocation.pdf µ

BH 2 @ BH 6 @

B BH 5 AX@ BH 15 BH 13 @ @ BH 8 AX@ BH 7 @

BH 3 @

BH 11

x @ x

BH 10

x @

BH 9 YONGE ST x @

x BH 14

@ x BH 4 BH 12 @

x BH 1 AX@ YONGE ST @

x A'

x x

Legend x Title:

PHASE TWO PROPERTY SITE PLAN - Property/Lotx Line Project: - Phase Two Property Boundary PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT UPDATE @ - Borehole DON RIVER 3885 YONGE ST., TORONTO, ON A@ - Former Monitoring Well Client: X TORONTO PARKING AUTHORITY A A' - Cross Section Line Date: July 2014 Updated: 1:600 10 5 0 10 20 Aug. 21, 2014

Metres FIGURE 2.2 2218-1101-ESAII_update/AD/MZ/SitePlan_preRem.pdf BH 2 SS1 SS3 SS5 BH 6 SS6 SS7 BH 8 SS6 BH 3 SS1 SS3 SS4 BH 10 SS6 BH 12 SS6 BH 4 SS1 SS2 SS4 (25‐AUG‐10) (0‐0.6) (1.5‐2.0) (3.05‐3.5) (07‐APR‐11) (4.6‐5.05) (6.1‐6.6) (07‐APR‐11) (4.6‐5.05) (25‐AUG‐10) (0‐0.6) (1.5‐2.0) (2.3‐2.75) (04‐APR‐11) (4.6‐5.05) (04‐APR‐11) (4.6‐5.05) (25‐AUG‐10) (0‐0.6) (0.75‐1.2) (2.3‐2.75) EC 0.7 0.87 0.54 EC 0.92 0.71 EC 0.2 EC 2.4 4.3 0.64 EC 0.26 EC 0.23 EC 0.56 0.82 0.66 SAR 7.0 9.9 2.4 SAR 86.7 SAR 1.2 SAR 14 27 2.2 SAR 1.7 SAR 0.97 SAR 15 19 9.1

MOE PARAMETER UNIT PSS Table 9 EC ms/cm 0.7 4.3 SAR ‐‐‐ 5.0 34 BH 5 SS1 SS2 SS3 BH 15 SS6 SS9 SS10 BH 3 SS1 SS3 SS4 BH 10 SS6 BH 14 SS6 SS7 SS8 BH 12 SS6 BH 1 SS1 SS2 SS4 (25‐AUG‐10) (0‐0.6) (0.75‐1.2) (1.5‐2.0) (11‐DEC‐10) (4.6‐5.05) (9.15‐9.3) (10.7‐10.8) (25‐AUG‐10) (0‐0.6) (1.5‐2.0) (2.3‐2.75) (04‐APR‐11) (4.6‐5.05) (11‐DEC‐10) (4.6‐5.05) (6.1‐6.6) (7.6‐7.8) (04‐APR‐11) (4.6‐5.05) (25‐AUG‐10) (0‐0.6) (0.75‐1.2) (2.3‐2.75) EC 0.95 1.7 0.89 EC 0.7 0.8 0.58 EC 2.4 4.3 0.64 EC 0.26 EC 1.4 1.4 0.19 EC 0.23 EC 0.65 2.5 0.69 SAR 30 2.9 2.9 SAR 11 16 3.8 SAR 14 27 2.2 SAR 1.7 SAR 30 29 2.8 SAR 0.97 SAR 18 34 12

MOE PARAMETER UNIT PSS Table 9 EC ms/cm 0.7 4.3 SAR ‐‐‐ 5.0 34 YORK MILLS RD

4021 µ

10 FUEL SERVICE STATION Legend

- Phase Two Property Boundary 11 25 Old York Mills Rd. - Phase One ESA Study Area

9 - Off-Site Potentially 4015 WILSON AVE 14 Contaminating Activity P A R K L A N D Campbell Crs - Area of Potential Environmental APEC 7: 12 Concern (APEC) Northern Property 7 Boundary of Parking lot 125.2 - Ground Water Contour (Apr. 2011) (Potential Impacts From R E S I D E N T I A L

Off-Site Retail Gasoline 10 ¶ - Inferred Ground Water Direction Service Station) 5

8 3 18 APARTMENT 6 BUILDING 4000 TTC SUBWAY LINE EASEMENT 1

SANITARY SEWER LINE EASEMENT 4 8

DON RIVER 24 6

YONGE ST APEC 5: 2 East Property Boundary of Parking lot Old Yonge St (Potential On-Site Impacts of Leakage From Sanitary Sewer Main) 5 26 24 22 125.4 125.3 3 20

NOTE: ¶ 18 Brookfield Rd. Phase Two ESA investigations have shown PARKING LOT 16 CONDOMINIUM APECs 1, 3, 4, 5 ,6 and 7 pathways to be inactive BUILDING JOLLY MILLER 1 14

125.2 TAVERN R E S I D E N T I A L RESATAURANT APEC 1: 4 21 Parking lot 2 3900 (Potential Unknown 19 18 Quality Fill on the Site) 15 20 16 APEC 2: 11 22 3885 Parking lot 9 24 (Application of Road Salt, 5 Spills and Leaks of Oils 3 15 and Automotive Fluids) McGlashan Ct. Mill St APEC 3: Parking lot APEC 6: 17 17 South and West Property (Possible Pesticide Application on 21 19 Boundary of Parking lot 23 (Potential Off-Stie PCAs at Parkland and Former Jolly Miller Tavern Restaurant, Agricultural Land) R E S I D E N T I A L 3900 & 4000 Yonge St.) 15 APEC 4: 16 Parking lot (Potential Contaminated 45 1:2,500 Soil During TTC Subway 14 18 10 12 Construction and Possible 40 20 0 40 80 120 Use of the Site as a 43 Staging Area) Metres 19 41 Title: 46 Eastview Crs. P A R K L A N D POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATING ACTIVITIES AND 17 AERAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN 15 44 Project: PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT UPDATE 3885 YONGE ST., TORONTO, ON Client: TORONTO PARKING AUTHORITY

Date: July 2014 3800 Updated: Aug. 21, 2014 FIGURE 6.3 2218-1101_ESAII_update/AD/MZ/SiteMap_PCAs-n-APECs.pdf µ

Legend

- Site Property Boundary ASPHALT WALKWAY - Fill Cap

- Ashpalt/Concrete Hard Cap

@ - Borehole Location BH 2 (No Analytical Results for EC/SAR) @ BH 6 @ A@ BH 2 SS1 SS3 SS5 X - Borehole/Former Monitoring Well Location @ BH 5 SS1 SS2 SS3 (All Analyzed Parameters Meet (25-AUG-10) (0-0.6) (1.5-2.0) (3.05-3.5) A S (25-AUG-10) (0-0.6) (0.75-1.2) (1.5-2.0) Site Condition Standards and EC 0.7 0.87 0.54 P H EC 0.95 1.7 0.89 Property Specific Standards) SAR 7.0 9.9 2.4 A L SAR 30 2.9 2.9 @ A@ T X - Borehole/Former Monitoring Well Location BH 6 SS6 SS7 W (One or More Analyzed Parameters A Exceed Site Condition Standards but (07-APR-11) (4.6-5.05) (6.1-6.6) L K BH 15 SS6 SS9 SS10 Meet the Property Specific Standards) EC 0.92 0.71 W A (11-DEC-10) (4.6-5.05) (9.15-9.3) (10.7-10.8) SAR 8 6.7 Y BH 5 EC 0.7 0.8 0.58 SAR 11 16 3.8 BH 8 SS6 AX@ (07-APR-11) (4.6-5.05) BH 15 FILL CAP AREA BH 13 @ EC 0.2 @ SAR 1.2 BH 8 GRAVEL BH 7 SS6 SS7 APPLICABLE STANDARDS A@ WALKWAY Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards for use within X (07-APR-11) (4.6-5.05) (6.1-6.6) 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Ground Water EC 0.72 0.74 Condition (April 15, 2011), Residential / Parkland / @ Institutional / Industrial / Commercial / Community SAR 10 9.7 BH 7 Property Use, Coarse and Medium Fine Textured Soils. MOE PARAMETER UNIT PSS CONCRETE Table 9 WALKWAY BH 3 SS1 SS3 SS4 EC ms/cm 0.7 4.3 (25-AUG-10) (0-0.6) (1.5-2.0) (2.3-2.75) A YONGE ST SAR --- 5.0 34 S EC 2.4 4.3 0.64 P Notes: H SAR 14 27 2.2 - Sample depths relative to previous site BH 3 A grade; for current depths add approximateley @ L T 0.30m W - PSS: Property Specific Standards A BH 11 SS6 SS7 L - Red and Bold value indicates analytical K (07-APR-11) (4.6-5.05) (6.1-6.6) result exceeds MOE Table 9 Standards W BH 11 A EC 0.69 0.43 but meets the PSS Y @ - Green value indicates analytical result SAR 10 1.4 meets MOE Table 9 Standards and the PSS

FILL CAP AREA BH 10 @ BH 10 SS6 (04-APR-11) (4.6-5.05) BH 9 EC 0.26 @ SAR 1.7 BH 9 SS5 (04-APR-11) (3.05-3.5) BH 14 EC 0.4 @ SAR 6.6 BH 4 BH 12 @ AX@ BH 1 BH 14 SS6 SS7 SS8 @ BH 4 SS1 SS2 SS4 (11-DEC-10) (4.6-5.05) (6.1-6.6) (7.6-7.8) (25-AUG-10) (0-0.6) (0.75-1.2) (2.3-2.75) 1:600 EC 1.4 1.4 0.19 EC 0.56 0.82 0.66 5 2.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 SAR 30 29 2.8 SAR 15 19 9.1 Metres BH 1 SS1 SS2 SS4 BH 12 SS6 Title: (25-AUG-10) (0-0.6) (0.75-1.2) (2.3-2.75) (04-APR-11) (4.6-5.05) SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS EC 0.65 2.5 0.69 EC 0.23 Project: SAR 18 34 12 SAR 0.97 PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT UPDATE 3885 YONGE ST., TORONTO, ON Client: DON RIVER TORONTO PARKING AUTHORITY

Date: July 2014 Updated: Aug. 22, 2014 FIGURE 6.4 2218-1101-ESAII_update/AD/MZ/Results_SS.pdf