DOCSLIB.ORG

Historic Resource Evaluation of the Property Located at 146

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historic Resource Evaluation of the Property Located at 146 HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 146 HEALDSBURG AVENUE, HEALDSBURG, SONOMA COUNTY, CA SUBMITTED TO: Replay Healdsburg, LLC. SUBMITTED BY: Stacey De Shazo, M.A. Principal Architectural Historian [email protected] Evans & De Shazo, Inc Updated October 16, 2017 6876 Sebastopol Avenue, Sebastopol, CA 95472 707-812-7400 www.evans-deshazo.com Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Project Description ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................................................................ 3 California Environmental Quality Act ....................................................................................................... 3 City of Healdsburg General Plan: Historic and Cultural Resource Element .......................................... 5 Historic Context ............................................................................................................................................ 6 History of Healdsburg ............................................................................................................................... 7 Railroad Development .............................................................................................................................. 8 The Redwood Highway ............................................................................................................................. 9 Highway 101 ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Twentieth Century Development Trends ............................................................................................... 10 The Development of the South and East Sides of Healdsburg ............................................................... 11 Property History...................................................................................................................................... 11 Literature Review ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Historic Resource Survey ............................................................................................................................ 18 1930 Buffi’s Inn Building ......................................................................................................................... 19 Historic Significance ...................................................................................................................................... 8 NRHP/CRHR Criterion for Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 9 Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 13 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................................ 15 Attachment A: Deparment of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 forms Updated HRE for 146 Healdsburg Avenue, Healdsburg, Sonoma County, CA. Page i Introduction Evans & De Shazo, Inc (EDS) was contracted by Replay Healdsburg, LLC to provide an updated Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE) of the property located at 146 Healdsburg Avenue, Healdsburg, California (Property) to address potential significant impacts to historical resources that could result from actions associated with the proposed “Mill District” Project (Project) that includes a re-development and revitalization effort within the southern portion of the City of Healdsburg, which conforms with the "Central Healdsburg Avenue Plan” (CHAP) created by Healdsburg City Council to implement a significant program of the 2030 Healdsburg General Plan.1 The Project includes the proposed demolition of a 1930 two-story Mediterranean Revival style building, called Buffi’s Inn (also known as the House of Sonoma) that was previously evaluated by EDS in 2015 and determined not eligible for listing on either the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) or the National Register of Historic Place (NRHP), nor did it meet the standards for preservation set forth by the City of Healdsburg for a local historic listing.2 The following HRE has been updated to address current Project specific impacts to ensure compliance with CEQA and the City of Healdsburg Historic Resources Protection code. The survey, evaluation, and recommendations within this updated HRE have not changed from the 2015 HRE completed by EDS, only details related to the specifics of this proposed Project have been incorporated at the request of the City of Healdsburg. The updated HRE is based on specific guidelines and evaluation criteria of the CRHR (14 CCR §15064.5 and PRC§ 21084.1) and the NRHP (36 CFR Part 60.4), as well as guidelines developed by the City of Healdsburg. Stacey De Shazo, M.A., who is a Secretary of Interior-qualified Architectural Historian served as Principal Architectural Historian. Project Description The Project consists of the re-development of four parcels that include the subject Property known as Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 002-303-013, located at 146 Healdsburg Avenue (1.77-acres) and the adjacent property known as Nu Forest Products, within APNs 002-261-023, 002-261-024, and 002-303- 012 and located at 164 Healdsburg Avenue (9.6-acres). The Project Area for this HRE is the 1.77-acres parcel. The Project related to the subject property entails the proposed demolition of the 1930 Buffi’s Inn that was evaluated by EDS in 2015 and determined not eligible for listing on the CRHR, and the adjacent Nu Forest Products buildings within APNs 002-261-023, 002-261-024, and 002-303-012 that were evaluated by EDS in 2017. Project Location The 1.77 acres Property at 146 Healdsburg Avenue is located on the east side of Healdsburg Avenue, in Healdsburg, Sonoma County, California, approximately 0.28 miles south of the Historic Healdsburg Plaza, 650 feet south of Mill Street, and approximately 550 feet north of Exchange Avenue (Figure 1). 1 Central Healdsburg Plan Final EIR, 2013. City of Healdsburg. Prepared by GHD Inc. 2 Stacey De Shazo (Evans & De Shazo). Historic Resource Evaluation of the Property located at 146 Healdsburg Avenue, Sonoma County, 2015 Updated HRE for 146 Healdsburg Avenue, Healdsburg, Sonoma County, CA. 1 Figure 1. Project Location Map. Updated HRE for 146 Healdsburg Avenue, Healdsburg, Sonoma County, CA. 2 Regulatory Setting Historical resources are distinguished by features, materials, spaces, and spatial relationships that contribute to their historic character. The Property, which includes a 1930 building, was surveyed and evaluated to determine historic integrity and eligibility for listing on the NRHP and CRHR in 2015. According to California Code of Regulations Section 15064.5, cultural resources are historically significant if they are: • Listed in, or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) (Public Resources Code 5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4850 et. seq.); • Listed in, or eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP); • Included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in an historical resource survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resource Code; or • Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California, provided the lead agency’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. California Environmental Quality Act CEQA and the Guidelines for Implementing CEQA (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5) give direction and guidance for evaluation of properties and the preparation of Initial Studies, Categorical Exemptions, Negative Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports. Pursuant to California State law, the City of Healdsburg responsible for determining the environmental impact of any land use proposal it approves. Cultural resources are aspects of the environment that require identification and assessment for potential significance under CEQA (14 CCR 15064.5 and PRC 21084.1). There are five classes of cultural resources defined by the State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). These are: • Building: A structure created principally to shelter or assist in carrying out any form of human activity. A “building” may also be used to refer to a historically and functionally related unit, such as a courthouse and jail or a house and barn. • Structure: A construction made for a functional purpose rather than creating human shelter. Examples include mines, bridges, and tunnels. • Object: Construction primarily artist in nature or relatively small in scale and simply constructed. It may be movable by nature or design or made for a specific
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archival Study for the Fish Habitat Flows and Water Rights Project
    APPENDIX D Archival Study for the Fish Habitat Flows and Water Rights Project An Archival Study for the Fish Habitat Flows and Water Rights Project Mendocino and Sonoma Counties, California Eileen Barrow, M.A. June 6, 2016 An Archival Study for the Fish Habitat Flows and Water Rights Project Mendocino and Sonoma Counties, California Prepared by: _________________________________ Eileen Barrow, M.A. Tom Origer & Associates Post Office Box 1531 Rohnert Park, California 94927 (707) 584-8200 Prepared for: Sonoma County Water Agency 404 Aviation Santa Rosa, California 95407 June 6, 2016 ABSTRACT Tom Origer & Associates conducted an archival study for the Fish Habitat Flows and Water Rights Project, as requested by the Sonoma County Water Agency. This study was designed to meet requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Per the findings of the National Marine Fisheries Service (2008), the Sonoma County Water Agency is seeking to improve Coho salmon and steelhead habitat in the Russian River and Dry Creek by modifying the minimum instream flow requirements specified by the State Water Resources Control Board's 1986 Decision 1610. The current study includes a ⅛ mile buffer around Lake Mendocino, Lake Sonoma, the Russian River from Coyote Valley Dam to the Pacific Ocean, and Dry Creek from Warm Springs Dam to the Russian River. The study included archival research at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University (NWIC File No. 15-1481); archival research at the Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley; examination of the library and files of Tom Origer & Associates; and contact with the Native American community. Documentation pertaining to this study is on file at the offices of Tom Origer & Associates (File No.
    [Show full text]
  • 1983 Cultural Resource Survey-Final Report
    Edwin Langhart Museum City of Healdsburg PARTIALLY FUNDED BY California State Of fice of Hist oric Preservation Healdsburg Cultural Resource Survey FINAL REPORT 1983 0 D 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS stateJJEnt of purpose 1 preservation activities 2 ... historical overview 4 town plat, 1857 <map A> 22 town plat, 1867 <map B> 23 town plat, 1877 <map C> 24 town plat, 1898 <map D> 25 population chart, 1910 - 1980 26 architectural overview 27 methodology 36 recanmendations for use 42 conclusions 44 areas for future survey 45 bibliography, historical 46 master list of individual properties appendix 1 master list of contributors appendix 2 master-list by street address appendix 3 master list by historical occupants appendix 4 r 0 0 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This survey was initiated by the citizenry of Healdsburg and by □ instruction of the Healdsburg City Council to assess the quantity and quality of historic structures, objects, areas and sites in the Healdsburg community. This survey is a first step towards compliance with the Healdsburg General Policies Plan □ of 1978, wh�ch states the folllowing: "The city-will undertake a survey to identify struc­ tures or areas of historic or cultural value an , to take all necessary steps to conserve them" (Conserva­. tion and Open Space, Goal A-2) "Special provisions should be made to allow historic structures to be utilized for occupancy by residents or 0 businesses." (Conservatt.ion and Open Space, Goal A-2.1) "Sites of ecological, archaeological and historical significance shall be preserved and protected." (Parks □ and Recreation, Goal C-2) The scope of the survey will cover an approximately 48,000 acre area including and surrounding the City of Healdsburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 1 File# UPE18-0035 September 17, 2019
    Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 1 File# UPE18-0035 September 17, 2019 Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Publication Date: September 17, 2019 Public Review Period: Sept. 17 - Oct. 17, 2019 State Clearinghouse Number: Permit Sonoma File Number: UPE18-0035 Prepared by: Georgia McDaniel and Scott Davidson Phone: (707) 565-4919 Pursuant to Section 15071 of the State CEQA Guidelines, this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and the attached Initial Study, including the identified mitigation measures and monitoring program, constitute the environmental review conducted by the County of Sonoma as lead agency for the proposed project described below: Project Name: Legacy Winery Project Applicant/Operator: Jackson Family Investments III, LLC, Attn: Geoff Scott and Debbie Welch Project Owner: Jackson Family Investments III, LLC Project Location/Address: 10075 CA-128, Healdsburg APN: 132-040-013 General Plan Land Use Designation: Land Intensive Agriculture, One dwelling unit per 20 acres (LIA 20) Zoning Designation: Land Intensive Agriculture (LIA), One dwelling unit per 20 acres (B6 20), Accessory Unit Exclusion (Z), Scenic Resources (SR) Decision Making Body: Sonoma County Board of Zoning Adjustments Appeal Body: Sonoma County Board of Supervisors Project Description: See Item IV, below Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 2 File# UPE18-0035 September 17, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, Circa 1852-1904
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb109nb422 Online items available Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Finding Aid written by Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Documents BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM 1 Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in Cali... Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Finding Aid Written By: Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt. Date Completed: March 2008 © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Documents pertaining to the adjudication of private land claims in California Date (inclusive): circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892 Microfilm: BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM Creators : United States. District Court (California) Extent: Number of containers: 857 Cases. 876 Portfolios. 6 volumes (linear feet: Approximately 75)Microfilm: 200 reels10 digital objects (1494 images) Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: In 1851 the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Assessment
    Biological Resources Assessment 1434 Grove Street Healdsburg, California Prepared For: City of Healdsburg August 20, 2019 ECORP Consulting, Inc. has assisted public and private land owners with environmental regulation compliance since 1987. We offer full service capability, from initial baseline environmental studies through environmental planning review, permitting negotiation, liaison to obtain legal agreements, mitigation design, and monitoring and compliance reporting. Citation: ECORP Consulting, Inc. (ECORP). 2019. Biological Resources Assessment for the 1434 Grove Street Project. Prepared for City of Healdsburg, California. August. Biological Resources Assessment for the 1434 Grove Street Project CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Location and Description.................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose of this Biological Resources Assessment ................................................................................. 1 2.0 REGULATORY SETTING ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Federal Regulations ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1.1 Endangered Species
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: Hazards and Hazardous Materials
    City of Healdsburg—Oaks at Foss Creek Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix E: Hazards and Hazardous Materials FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\3257\32570015\ISMND\wp\32570015 Oaks at Foss Creek ISMND.docx THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Phase I and Limited Phase II Environmental Assessment 111, 145, 153, 157, & 165 Chiquita Road Healdsburg, California (Rev. 1) Prepared for: DRG Builders, Inc. 3480 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 260 Pleasant Hill, California 94523 Project No. REE-62-08A-15 September 1, 2015 ROSEWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 1079-B Sunrise Boulevard, Suite 168 Roseville, California 95661 ROSEWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Project No.: REE-62-08A-15 September 1, 2015 Doyle Heaton DRG Builders, Inc. 3480 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 260 Pleasant Hill, California 94523 Subject: Phase I and Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 111, 145, 153, 157, & 165 Chiquita Road Healdsburg, California Dear Mr. Heaton: We are submitting this revision (1) to the Phase I and Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment of the above referenced site. The only substantial changes is the addition of the following language on pages v and 50: “In conclusion, it is Rosewood Environmental Engineering's opinion that, with the listed recognized environmental conditions addressed according to the recommendations, the Site will be suitable for residential development.” Should you have any questions relating to the contents of this report or require any additional information, please contact our office at your convenience. Very truly yours, Rosewood Environmental Engineering Assisted by: Erika Chester Cheryl Bly-Chester, PE, REPA Environmental Specialist EPA Qualified Environmental Professional (EP) Copies: 1079-B Sunrise Boulevard, Suite 168, Roseville, CA 95661.
    [Show full text]
  • HRE and Standards Review for 228 Fitch Street, Healdsburg, CA Page Ii
    HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION AND SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR THE TREATMENT OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES REVIEW FOR THE 1858 HOMESTEAD COTTAGE AT 228 FITCH STREET, HEALDSBURG, SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED TO: Jane Rosenberg [email protected] SUBMITTED BY: Stacey De Shazo, M.A. Principal Architectural Historian [email protected] Evans & De Shazo, Inc 1141 Gravenstein Highway South, updated September 30, 2019 Sebastopol, CA 95472 707-812-7400 www.evans-deshazo.com Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT LOCATION AND UNDERSTANDING ............................................................................................................ 1 REGULATORY SETTING ............................................................................................................................................. 3 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT .......................................................................................................................... 3 SECRETARY OF INTERIOR’S STANDARDS .................................................................................................................................. 4 CITY OF HEALDSBURG GENERAL PLAN: HISTORIC RESOURCES ELEMENT (CHAPTER 6) ..................................................................... 5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PRINCIPLES AND BEST PRACTICES ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summer, Issue 97
    RUSSIAN RIVER RECORDER SUMMER 2 00 7 • ISSUE 97 An Official Publication of the Healdsburg Museum and Historical Society LIFE IN PIONEER HEALDSBURG by Holly Hoods 5 JOSEFA CARRILLO DE FITCH: SOTOYOME'S LAST SOVEREIGN by Daniel EMurley Pages Josefa Carrillo de Fitch Henry Ftich ALSO IN THIS ISSUE THE HEALD FAMILY AND THEIR NOTABLE CONTRIBUTIONS by Charlotte Anderson Page 12 RUSSIAN RIVER AND HEALDSBURG as printed in the Sonoma County Journal, June 26,1857 Page 4 In This Issue when the Russian River Recorder's editorial committee met in late 2006 to plan for the editorial content of the four issues which would be pubUshed during Healdsburg's Sesquicentennial celebration the committee felt we should try to emphasize what Ufe was hkeinl857. In this issue our research curator Holly Hoods has taken on the task in her article HEALDSBURG MUSEUM AND HISTORICAL SOCIEIT Edwin Langhart, Founder aptly titled "Life in Pioneer Healdsburg." She recounts that Harmon Heald's oldest brother actually was the first to arrive "to fulfill a labor contract to build a combination sawmill 2007 Officers and grist mill on the upper falls of Mill Creek." She tells us about the barter economy, the Ann Mahoney, President start of Heald's Store, and how the town grew after Harmon Heald offered lots for sale. We James Brush, Vice President Ed Summerville, Recording Secretary also find out that "the 1857 town of Healdsburg had aspirations but few pretensions. Bars Chris Baldenhofer, Treasurer and dance halls dotted the west side of West Street (Healdsburg Avenue) while churches Stan Becker, Y Treasurer encircled the plaza." Among those who came to the area were "adventurers, rowdies and Al Loebel, Past President gamblers." 1 am certain you will find Holly's account of "Life in Pioneer Healdsburg" most Directors interesting and informative.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIAN RIVER RECORDER SPRING 2019 • ISSUE 142, Healdsban Official Publication of the Healdsburg Museukm & Historical Society
    RUSSIAN RIVER RECORDER SPRING 2019 • ISSUE 142, HEALDSBAn Official Publication of the Healdsburg MuseuKm & Historical Society Part 7fc?o Contents Russian River Recorder Spring 2019 • Issue 142 4 The Healdsburg Land Wars by Lauren Carriere 7 Cyrus Alexander: Brief Sketch of the Life of One of Our Pioneer of Pioneers by Charles Alexander reprinted from Russian River Flag, December 19,1878 11 Samuel Heald: The First Heald in Healdsburg by Pamela Vana-Paxhia 14 Early Healdsburg Memories: Some Original Settlers of this City by W. A. Maxwell reprinted from Healdsburg Tribune, Enterprise and Scimitar, March 26,1908 17 The Life and Times of Reverend Dr. Benjamin Blackman Bonham Contributions to Early Healdsburg by Jane Bonham, great-great-great niece of Dr. Benjamin Blackman Bonham 23 Cephus Perley Moore and Electa Odell Moore, Geyserville Pioneers by Ann Howard 28 Meaning of the Word "Sotoyome" reprinted from Healdsburg Enterprise, August 1,1908 Spring 2019 Russian River Recorder Page 3 t^V4 /§-'r''?^v'^X-'%'-.A\l:-r/'>X / '--n- ^, ^ - 30 A' '"^ LI ^7 Source: New Historical Atlas of Sonoma County, California, 1877 Rancho Sotoyome and Rancho Tzabaco as depicted in 1877 The Healdsburg Land Wars by Lauren Carriere Mexico was engaged in a war with the United Mexican ranchos revolved around their States during the late 1840s. One result of this war primary economic good: cattle. In the late 1840s, was the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which Rancho Tzabaco land sold at an average of $1.18 an included Mexican cession of California to the United acre while cattle could sell for as much as $25.00 a States.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resource
    A HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY FOR THE PROPOSED JAGUAR WAY EXTENSION – WINDSOR ROAD TO STARR ROAD PROJECT, TOWN OF WINDSOR, SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: Olivia Ervin, Environmental Planner M-Group 1303 Jefferson Street, Suite 100-B Napa, CA 95449 PREPARED BY: Stacey De Shazo, M.A. Principal Architectural Historian [email protected] March 15, 2018 Evans & De Shazo, Inc. 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472 707-812-7400 www.evans-deshazo.com ABSTRACT Evans & De Shazo, Inc. (EDS) completed a Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE) for the proposed Jaguar Way Extension - Windsor Road to Starr Road project (Project) located north of Windsor High School between Windsor Road and Starr Road in the Town of Windsor, Sonoma County, California. The HRE was conducted to meet the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The purpose of the HRE was to determine if the built environment resources located within the Project’s indirect Area of Potential Effect (indirect APE) that are at least 50 years of age are eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The indirect APE consists of three properties that include a ca. 1950 house at 8705 Windsor Road within Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 066-510-052, a 1934 house at 9050 Starr Road within APN 066-180-060, and a ca. 1945 house at 9049 Starr Road within APN 066- 180-030. The HRE was completed by EDS Principal Architectural Historian, Stacey De Shazo, M.A., who exceeds the Secretary of Interior’s professional qualification standards in historic architecture and history.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.5 Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
    3.5 CULTURAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES 3.5 CULTURAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES This section presents the environmental setting and impact analysis for cultural and tribal cultural resources that would be affected by the proposed project. Appendix E presents maps of the cultural resource pedestrian survey areas and copies of communications with the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and local Native American tribes in the region of the proposed project. 3.5.1 Definitions Cultural Resources Cultural resources in the State of California are recognized as non-renewable resources that require management to assure their benefit to present and future Californians. Cultural resources are generally defined as prehistoric and historic sites, structures, landscapes, districts, and any other physical evidence associated with human activity considered important to a culture, a subculture, or a community for scientific, traditional, religious, or any other reason. Cultural resources in CEQA are commonly categorized as either historical resources or archaeological resources because CEQA requires an analysis of a project’s effect on historical and archaeological resources. Historical Resources CEQA's provisions governing analysis of historical resources are set forth in PRC § 21084.1 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)-(b). CEQA includes objects of historical significance in its definition of "environment" (PRC § 21060.5). Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, the term “historical resources” is defined as: 1. A resource listed in, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). This resource can be of either historic or prehistoric age.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resource Evaluation of the Property Located at 164 Healdsburg Avenue, Healdsburg, Sonoma County, California
    HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 164 HEALDSBURG AVENUE, HEALDSBURG, SONOMA COUNTY, CA SUBMITTED TO: Replay Healdsburg, LLC. SUBMITTED BY: Stacey De Shazo, M.A. Principal Architectural Historian [email protected] Evans & De Shazo, Inc Updated October 27, 2017 6876 Sebastopol Avenue, Sebastopol, CA 95472 707-812-7400 www.evans-deshazo.com Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 PROPERTY LOCATION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 REGULATORY SETTING ....................................................................................................................................... 3 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ........................................................................................................................ 3 METHODS .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 HISTORIC SETTING .............................................................................................................................................. 5 EARLY HISTORY OF HEALDSBURG ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]