DOCSLIB.ORG

Yadkin Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2197 Relicensing Settlement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yadkin Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2197 Relicensing Settlement Yadkin Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2197 Relicensing Settlement Agreement February 2007 Table of Contents Table of Contents ...........................................................................................................................i List of Tables................................................................................................................................ iv List of Figures............................................................................................................................... v Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................... vi 1.0 General............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Effect of Settlement Agreement ..................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Definitions ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 General Provisions ........................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3.1 Scope of Settlement Agreement ................................................................................... 1-3 1.3.2 Procedures Regarding Certain Statutory Authorities and Obligations .............................. 1-3 1.3.3 Commitments During Relicensing ................................................................................. 1-4 1.3.4 Structure of Settlement Agreement ............................................................................... 1-5 1.3.5 Effective Date and Term of Settlement Agreement ......................................................... 1-5 1.3.6 Effective Date of Settlement Obligations ....................................................................... 1-6 1.3.7 Jurisdiction.................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.3.8 Dispute Resolution ...................................................................................................... 1-6 1.3.9 Withdrawal from Settlement Agreement ........................................................................ 1-8 1.3.10 Miscellaneous ............................................................................................................. 1-9 1.3.11 Actions upon Execution of Agreement......................................................................... 1-12 1.3.12 Rights, Duties, and Obligations Regarding Section 401 Certification ............................. 1-16 1.3.13 Potential for Negotiation of Recreation Easements ...................................................... 1-17 1.3.14 Termination of Settlement Agreement ......................................................................... 1-17 2.0 Settlement Provisions Not Covered by Proposed License Articles......................... 2-1 2.1 Project Operations ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Flow Adjustment for Enhancement of Downstream Spawning ........................................ 2-1 2.1.2 Low Inflow Prot ocol ..................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Water Quality ................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1 Tailwater Dissolved Oxygen Enhancement Schedule..................................................... 2-2 2.2.2 Tailwater Dissolved Oxygen Enhancement Operations .................................................. 2-4 2.2.3 Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring ....................................................................................... 2-4 2.2.4 Additional Dissolved Oxygen Enhancement Actions....................................................... 2-5 2.2.5 Total Maximum Daily Load Process .............................................................................. 2-5 2.3 Recreation ....................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.3.1 Recreation Facility Improvements................................................................................. 2-5 2.3.2 Operations and Maintenance Funding Commitments ..................................................... 2-5 2.3.3 Yadkin-Pee Dee River Trail Fund ................................................................................. 2-6 2.3.4 Railroad Lines ............................................................................................................. 2-6 2.3.5 Portage Trail Reimbursement ....................................................................................... 2-6 2.3.6 Recreation Safety and Enforcement.............................................................................. 2-7 2.3.7 Assessing Future Recreational Needs .......................................................................... 2-7 2.3.8 Compliance with the Project’s Shoreline Management Plan............................................ 2-7 2.3.9 Escalation of Funds ..................................................................................................... 2-7 Yadkin Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2197) i February 2007 Relicensing Settlement Agreement 2.4 Shoreline Management ..................................................................................................... 2-8 2.4.1 Modifications to the Existing Yadkin Shoreline Management Plan ................................... 2-8 2.4.2 Implementation of the Shoreline Management Plan Modifications ................................... 2-8 2.4.3 Fees ........................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.5 Wildlife, Aquatics, and Rare, Threatened and Endangered (RTE) Species............................ 2-8 2.5.1 RTE Species ............................................................................................................... 2-8 2.5.2 Invasive Exotic Species ............................................................................................... 2-9 2.6 Land Conveyances ........................................................................................................... 2-9 2.6.1 Morrow Mountain State Park Expansion Lands .............................................................. 2-9 2.6.2 Tuckertown Reservoir Lands ........................................................................................ 2-9 2.6.3 High Rock Reservoir Lands ........................................................................................ 2-10 2.6.4 Time Requirements of Land Conveyances .................................................................. 2-10 2.6.5 Interim Land Management ......................................................................................... 2-11 2.7 Land Grants ................................................................................................................... 2-11 2.7.1 Uwharrie National Forest Lands ................................................................................. 2-11 2.7.2 Eagle Point Nature Preserve and Park Lands .............................................................. 2-11 2.7.3 Town of Badin Lands ................................................................................................. 2-12 2.8 Local Community Enhancement ...................................................................................... 2-12 2.8.1 City of Albemarle Water Withdrawals .......................................................................... 2-12 3.0 Proposed License Articles ............................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Project Operations ............................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 Article PO-1 - Reservoir Operations .............................................................................. 3-1 3.1.2 Article PO-2 - Project Instream Flows............................................................................ 3-5 3.1.3 Article PO-3 - Flow and Reservoir Elevation Monitoring.................................................. 3-5 3.1.4 Article PO-4 - Low Inflow Protocol................................................................................. 3-6 3.1.5 Article PO-5 - Hydro Project Maintenance and Emergency Protocol .............................. 3-11 3.2 Water Quality ................................................................................................................. 3-11 3.2.1 Article WQ-1 - Water Quality ...................................................................................... 3-11 3.2.2 Article WQ-2 - Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring ............................................................... 3-11 3.3 Recreation ..................................................................................................................... 3-11 3.3.1 Article REC-1 - Recreational Enhancements ............................................................... 3-11 3.4 Shoreline Management ................................................................................................... 3-12 3.4.1 Article SMP-1 - Shoreline Management Plan ............................................................... 3-12 3.5 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biological Assessment to Determine Impacts of Selenium Pollution from Coal Ash Wastewater Discharges on Fish Populations in Lake Sutton, NC
    Biological Assessment to Determine Impacts of Selenium Pollution From Coal Ash Wastewater Discharges on Fish Populations in Lake Sutton, NC Prepared by A. Dennis Lemly, Ph.D. 215 Sapona Road, Lexington NC 27295 Prepared for Southern Environmental Law Center Chapel Hill Office 601 West Rosemary Street, Chapel Hill NC 27516 November 5 2013 1 Background Progress Energy owns and operates Lake Sutton NC as a cooling reservoir for the L.V. Sutton Steam Plant, a coal-fired electric generating facility. The lake is used as a disposal site for coal ash wastewater from the power plant and it is also open to the public for fishing. The NC Division of Inland Fisheries and/or Progress Energy have monitored fish populations and chemical pollution from coal ash in Lake Sutton since the late 1980’s (NCDIF 2010, 2013). Since that time, a substantial amount of information has resulted showing that Lake Sutton is polluted by the trace element selenium. Selenium is a well-documented contaminant in coal ash wastewater and it can cause developmental abnormalities and reproductive failure in fish and wildlife (Lemly 2002a). Although monitoring results indicate that the concentrations of selenium in fish equal or exceed diagnostic toxic levels there has been no detailed biological investigation to determine if impacts are actually occurring. The Southern Environmental Law Center commissioned this study to answer that question. The assessment method used was developed by Dr. Lemly through his work on other selenium-polluted lakes in NC and is published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature (Lemly 1993, 1997a). It consists of examining young fish for the presence of selenium-induced defects and then applying an assessment index to evaluate impacts on the Lake Sutton fish community.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply & Wastewater
    Piedmont Triad Climate Resiliency Tool Kit Water Supply & Wastewater Introduction Water is a scarce natural resource in the Piedmont region. As the Piedmont Triad continues to grow and develop, and the demand for potable water increases, it has become increasingly important to monitor the surface water capacity available to fulfill our regional water demand. Short-term solutions to water issues are generally quick and necessary steps in reaction to immediate concerns. However, a long-term planning approach will better prepare local governments for the unique challenges facing our region. Investment in a deeper understanding of the complex and challenging political, regulatory, and environmental issues surrounding water supply will help guide decision-makers to consider future ramifications of options in resource planning. This assessment of current and future (20-50 years) water resource needs and wastewater treatment plant capacity includes the 12-county Piedmont Triad Regional Council (PTRC) Region (Alamance, Caswell, Davidson, Davie, Forsyth, Guilford, Montgomery, Randolph, Rockingham, Stokes, Surry, and Yadkin Counties). Water supply and wastewater capacity are assessed within the context of surface water availability, projected population growth, geography, current laws and regulations, water quality, and patterns of water use (water conservation and water reuse). Background Drinking water comes from two primary sources, surface water or groundwater. Surface water is the water found above ground in the form of rainwater runoff, streams, rivers, lakes and reservoirs. Groundwater is unseen and deep in the ground saturating porous sandy soils or fractures of bedrock. Surface water and groundwater affect each other. Groundwater comes to the surface (springs) and can help replenish surface water.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Use Assessment
    Alcoa Power Generating Inc. Yadkin Division Yadkin Project Relicensing (FERC No. 2197) Recreational Use Assessment Draft Report December 2004 Prepared by ERM TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... ES-i 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................3 2.1 Data Collection...........................................................................................3 2.1.1 Spot Counts......................................................................................5 2.1.2 Visitor Use Surveys.........................................................................7 2.1.3 Tailwater Use Survey.....................................................................10 2.1.4 Canoe/Kayak Registry...................................................................11 2.1.5 Resident Use Survey......................................................................11 2.1.6 Private Community Use Survey.....................................................13 2.1.7 Business and Organization Survey ................................................15 2.1.8 Uwharrie National Forest Survey ..................................................16 2.1.9 Aerial Photographs.........................................................................16 2.2 Recreational Use Data Analysis..............................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Stanly County Land Use Plan
    STANLY COUNTY SECTION 1: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STANLY COUNTY LAND USE PLAN Introduction to the Final Report This revision of the Land Use Plan for Stanly County updates the 2002 Land Use Analysis and Development Plan that was prepared for the Board of Commissioners by the County Planning Board and County Planning Department. While the 1977 and 2002 plans provided an adequate planning and infrastructure decision-making tool for county officials and the public, changes in county development patterns necessitate an update. Stanly County and the rest of the Yadkin-Pee Dee Lakes region have a reputation as a place of wonderful natural beauty, from the lakes and rivers of eastern Stanly County, to the “rolling Kansas” district of Millingport, to the Uwharrie Mountains near Morrow Mountain State Park. The steady rise in population over the years verifies Stanly County’s livability and reputation as an excellent place to live, work, and play. The county remains one of the leading agricultural counties in North Carolina. The agricultural economy was for decades augmented by a strong industrial sector based on the textile and aluminum industries, among others. In addition, tourism has emerged as an important industry for the county. Today Stanly County lies at the edge of the growing Charlotte metropolitan region, a region that now extends into Cabarrus and Union Counties, both of which share Stanly County’s western border. While indications are already apparent that parts of western Stanly County are experiencing increased development activity, it is expected that major infrastructure projects— among them the completion of the eastern leg of the Interstate 485 Charlotte by-pass, and the widening of NC 24/27 to four lanes from the county line to Albemarle—will speed the rate of development and growth in the county.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Water Quality Parameters and Flow Dynamics In
    An Evaluation of Water Quality Parameters and Flow Dynamics in High Rock Lake, North Carolina to Assist in the Development of Nutrient Criteria for Lakes and Reservoirs in the State by Morgan Rudd Dr. Michael O’Driscoll, Advisor Dr. Grant Murray, Advisor April 26th, 2018 Master of Environmental Management Degree Candidate | May 2018 Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment of Duke University EXECUTIVE SUMMARY North Carolina reservoirs have a history of eutrophication problems, and studies addressing NC lake water quality were conducted as early as the 1960s. Most of North Carolina’s lakes are manmade reservoirs, and reservoir waters may respond differently to nutrient inputs based on differences in watershed area, residence time, depth, and other variables. A better understanding of riverine discharge and water quality parameter dynamics in North Carolina reservoirs will help guide nutrient development for the state. Due to impairments associated with designated uses for water supply, recreation, and aquatic life, High Rock Lake (HRL) has been listed on North Carolina’s 303d list of impaired waters since 2004. The lake and its tributaries are impaired due to elevated turbidity, chlorophyll-a, and pH. High Rock Dam, located in Rowan and Davidson Counties in North Carolina, was constructed on the Yadkin River in 1927. HRL is primarily fed by the Yadkin River and several smaller tributaries, draining a total area of 3974 square miles. North Carolina currently has surface water standards for chlorophyll-a (40 µg/L), turbidity (25 NTU- lakes), and pH (<6 or >9), but not for nutrients.
    [Show full text]
  • B-4626, Brnhp-0049(33)
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROY COOPER J. ERIC BOYETTE GOVERNOR SECRETARY March 19, 2021 US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 ATTN: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer NCDOT Coordinator Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14, and 401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed Replacement of the superstructure of Bridge No. 3 and the application of deck preservation treatment to Bridge 8 on NC 8/49 over the Yadkin River (Tuckertown Reservoir) in Davidson, Rowan and Stanly Counties, North Carolina, Division 9, TIP No. B-4626, BRNHP-0049(33). Debit $570 from WBS 38443.1.FS2 Dear Mr. Alsmeyer: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the superstructure on Bridge 3 and apply deck preservation treatment to Bridge 8 on NC 8/49 over the Yadkin River (Tuckertown Reservoir) in Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties with the same span arrangement on the existing alignment. This action will result in 18 feet of permanent impacts to the Yadkin River from bank stabilization and 0.57 ac of temporary impacts from causeways for bridge construction/rehabilitation. No stream mitigation will be required for this project. Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (ePCN), Stormwater Management Plan, and Permit Drawings. A Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist (MCDC) was completed in April 2018 and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request. Mailing Address: Telephone: (919) 707-6000 Location: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1000 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 RALEIGH NC 27610 1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER Website: www.ncdot.gov RALEIGH NC 27699-1598 A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT Website at: https://xfer.services.ncdot.gov/pdea/PermApps/.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Plan Areas East of I-85
    LLaanndd UUssee PPllaann AArreeaass EEaasstt ooff II--8855 RRoowwaann CCoouunnttyy,,, NNoorrtthh CCaarroollliiinnaa Prepared by the Rowan County Department of Planning & Development Adopted January 17, 2012 LAND USE PLAN AREAS EAST OF 1-85 ROWAN COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA Prepared for Rowan County Board of Commissioners Board Members Commissioning/Adopting the Plan Chad Mitchell, Chairman Carl Ford, Vice Chairman John Barber Raymond Coltrain James Sides County Manager Gary Page Planning and Development Director Ed Muire, AICP Date Adopted January 17, 2012 Prepared by Rowan County Department of Planning & Development Rowan County, NC 2 Land Use Study – Areas East of I-85 Committee A (Planning Board) Jack Fisher, Chairman Bill Brown Greg Edds Craig Pierce Larry Wright Rowan County Planning and Development Department Staff (Devoted to this Project) Ed Muire, AICP Director Shane Stewart Senior Planner Andrew Goodall, CZO Planner Fredda Greer Planning Technician Rowan County, NC 3 Land Use Study – Areas East of I-85 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 6 Background Information 7 Geography & Environment 7 Population 9 Housing 11 Public Facilities 13 Schools 15 Recreational Facilities 17 Transportation 18 Infrastructure 21 Historic Places 23 Agriculture 24 Future Land Use Recommendations 25 Planning Area One 26 Planning Area Two 27 Planning Area Three 28 Commercial Uses 29 Commercial Nodes 30 Commercial and Industrial Corridors 31 Residential Uses 32 Rural Areas 33 Natural Environment 34 Private Property Rights 34 Future Plans and Studies 35 Next Steps
    [Show full text]
  • Uwharrie National Forest Recreation Guide
    United States Department of Agriculture Recreation Guide Uw Discover the Uwharrie Ho ha National Forest, one of four me rri of the e N national forests in North Carolina. The forest Hike Uwh ati is named for the Uwharrie Mountains, known short or long arrie on Natio al F st as the oldest range in North America. The sections of the 20-mile Uwharrie nal Re ore prevalence of metavolcanic rocks has led National Recreation Trail (UNRT) to creation Trail geologists to surmise that a chain of volcanoes experience Uwharrie’s interior forest. The created the area’s mountains, once much higher heavily wooded trail is marked with white purchase property to re-establish UNRT to its but eroded over time into 1,000-foot peaks. blazes. It is open all year, and the difficulty original length of 50 miles. Archeologists have found human habitation level is rated from easy to moderate. in the Uwharrie Mountains spanning more The trail crosses several access points. Camping than 10,000 years. In 1790-1791, explorer John From south to north, look for trailhead There are several dispersed sites along the Lawson chronicled Native American tribes, parking at: route. Groups and individuals can camp at Yates plants, animals and geology in his journals, • NC Highway 24/27 Trailhead, 10 miles Place. There is a 0.25-mile connector trail to later published as A New Voyage to Carolina. He west of Troy the UNRT. Visitors looking for a campground called the river “Heighwaree,” and later explorers • Yates Place Camp on Dusty Level Road can try West Morris Mountain Campground, called it “Uharie.” (State Route (SR) 1146) which has individual tenting or camper sites, In 1931, the federal government began • NC Highway 109 Trailhead, eight miles with picnic tables, lantern posts and fire rings.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcoa Power Generating Inc. Yadkin Division PO Box 576 Badin, North Carolina 28009-0576 Tel: 1-888-886-1063 Fax: 1-704-422-5776
    Alcoa Power Generating Inc. Yadkin Division PO Box 576 Badin, North Carolina 28009-0576 Tel: 1-888-886-1063 Fax: 1-704-422-5776 September 4, 2015 Secretary Kimberly D. Bose Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street NE Washington, DC 20426 RE: Yadkin Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2197) Expedited Request for Temporary License Variance Dear Secretary Bose: Alcoa Power Generating Inc. (APGI), owner and operator of the Yadkin Project, No. P- 2197 (Project), respectfully requests expedited action by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) to approve a temporary variance from license requirements regarding (a) minimum flows downstream of the Project; and (b) reservoir draw down limits for the Project’s High Rock and Narrows Reservoirs. The reasons for this request are set forth below. Background APGI operates the Project under an annual license inasmuch as its application for a new license remains pending before the Commission. However, the project immediately downstream on the same watershed, the Yadkin – Pee Dee Project, No. P-2206, owned by Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy), received a new license by order of the Commission on April 1, 2015 (Order Issuing New License, 151 FERC P62,004). Included in the new Yadkin – Pee Dee Project license is a Low Inflow Protocol (LIP) that describes the procedures to be undertaken in the event that drought conditions occur on the watershed. APGI’s pending application for a new Yadkin Project license also contains an identical version of the LIP as Appendix A to the Relicensing Settlement Agreement submitted on May 7, 2007. However, because a new license has not been issued and APGI is operating under an annual license, its drought responsibilities are governed by a Drought Contingency Plan (DCP) approved in 2003.1 The LIP and APGI’s existing DCP are substantially similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin Is the Cradle of Civilization in the Carolinas
    RIVER YA DKIN-PE E DEE BASIN he Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin is the cradle of civilization in the Carolinas. Here, T evidence of 12,000 years of activity documents the history of Native Americans in the Southeast. The basin’s gently contoured Uwharrie Mountains, the oldest mountain range in North America, played as much profile: a role in human settlement as the fertile Total miles of streams and rivers: rivers that slice through them. 5,862 SC In the early 19th century, the basin was the scene Total acres of lakes: of the nation’s first documented gold discovery. All 22,988 of this cultural bounty is set in a landscape ripe with aquatic Municipalities resources—cold-water and coolwater trout streams, slower-moving within basin: 93 Piedmont streams, and even streams with Coastal Plain characteristics. Much of the Yadkin Counties River is bound by a series of man-made lakes. within basin: 21 Size: 7,221 From its headwaters near Blowing Rock, the Yadkin River flows east and then south across square miles North Carolina’s densely populated midsection. It travels 203 miles—passing farmland; Population: draining the urban landscapes of Winston-Salem, Statesville, Lexington and Salisbury; and 1,675,937 fanning through seven man-made reservoirs before its name changes to the Pee Dee River (2010 U.S. Census) below Lake Tillery. The Pee Dee courses another 230 miles to the Atlantic, leaving North Carolina near the community of McFarlan and ending its journey at South Carolina’s Winyah Bay. The Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin bisects North Carolina, running north to south, neatly separating counties on its journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Yadkin - Pee Dee River Basin Plan 2008 Summary Hydrologic Unit Code 030401
    Yadkin - Pee Dee River Basin Plan 2008 Summary Hydrologic Unit Code 030401 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Yadkin-Pee Dee River basin is the second largest basin in North NC DWQ YADKIN - PEE DEE RIVER BASIN PLAN SUMMARY 2008 - PEE DEE RIVER BASIN PLAN SUMMARY YADKIN NC DWQ Carolina and covers approximately 7,213 square miles, spanning 21 BASIN AT A GLANCE counties. Originating on the eastern slopes of the Blue Ridge Mountains COUNTIES in Caldwell and Wilkes counties, the Yadkin River flows northeasterly for about 100 miles and then turns southeast until joined by the Uwharrie Alexander, Alleghany, Anson, Ashe, River to form the Pee Dee River. The Pee Dee River continues its southeast Cabarrus, Caldwell, Davidson, course through North and South Carolina to Winyah Bay at the Atlantic Davie, Forsyth, Guilford, Iredell, Ocean. Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Randolph, Richmond, Rowan, Increasing nutrient enrichment, urbanization, and wastewater are the Scotland, Stanly, Stokes, Surry, primary impacts to water quality in this basin. Most of these impacts are Union, Watauga, Wilkes, Yadkin focused in the counties of Forsyth, Rowan, Iredell, Cabarrus, Davidson, and Union. Land conversion from forest and agricultural practices to PERMITTED FACILITIES suburban uses is occurring nearly everywhere throughout this basin. Only protected natural areas and steep mountainous terrain are not impacted NPDES WWTP by these changes. Major: 40 Minor: 193 Despite these areas of concern, there are still streams in largely forested NPDES Nondischarge: 80 and comparatively undeveloped catchments with very good water quality. NPDES Stormwater Most of these waters are found in northern Wilkes, western Surry, and General: 647 portions of Montgomery County (Uwharrie National Forest).
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Report
    Sediment Fate and Transport DRAFT Report Alcoa Power Generating Inc. Yadkin Division Yadkin Project Relicensing (FERC No. 2197) SEDIMENT FATE AND TRANSPORT REPORT Draft Report December 2004 Prepared by Normandeau Associates, Inc. and PB Power Sediment Fate and Transport DRAFT Report Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................iii 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................1 2 LITERATURE REVIEW APPROACH .......................................................................................2 2.1 Purpose................................................................................................................................2 2.2 Sources of Information........................................................................................................2 3 SEDIMENT TRANSPORT LITERATURE REVIEW................................................................3 3.1 Erosion and Sediment Inventory Special Report ................................................................3 3.2 Sediment Characteristics of North Carolina Streams 1970-1979 .......................................6 3.3 Sources, Sinks, and Storage of River Sediment in the Atlantic Drainage of the United States .....................................................................................................................10 3.4 Water Quality of the Yadkin-Pee Dee River System,
    [Show full text]