DOCSLIB.ORG

THE FULL LIST of ALL CLIPS in “Edited By” VERSION #1, Total Running Time 1:15:00 (The Companion Film to Womenfilmeditors.Princeton.Edu)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE FULL LIST of ALL CLIPS in “Edited By” VERSION #1, Total Running Time 1:15:00 (The Companion Film to Womenfilmeditors.Princeton.Edu) THE FULL LIST OF ALL CLIPS in “Edited By” VERSION #1, total running time 1:15:00 (the companion film to WomenFilmEditors.princeton.edu) 1 THE IRON HORSE (1924) Edited by Hettie Gray Baker Directed by John Ford 2 OLD IRONSIDES 1926 Edited by Dorothy Arzner Directed by James Cruze 3 THE FALL OF THE ROMANOV DYNASTY (PADENIE DINASTII ROMANOVYKH) (1927) Edited by Esfir Shub Directed by Esfir Shub 4 OCTOBER (TEN DAYS THAT SHOOK THE WORLD) (OKTYABR) (1927) Edited by Esfir Tobak Directed by Grigoriy Aleksandrov and Sergei M. Eisenstein 5 MAN WITH A MOVIE CAMERA (CHELOVEK S KINO-APPARATOM) (1929) Edited by Yelizaveta Svilova Directed by Dziga Vertov 6 CLEOPATRA (1934) Edited by Anne Bauchens Directed by Cecil B. De Mille 7 CAMILLE (1936) Edited by Margaret Booth Directed by George Cukor 8 RULES OF THE GAME (LA RÈGLE DU JEU) (1939) Edited by Marguerite Renoir Directed by Jean Renoir 9 THE WIZARD OF OZ (1939) Edited by Blanche Sewell Directed by Victor Fleming 10 MESHES OF THE AFTERNOON (1943) Edited by Maya Deren Directed by Maya Deren and Alexander Hammid 11 LIFEBOAT (1944) Edited by Dorothy Spencer Directed by Alfred Hitchcock 12 ROME, OPEN CITY (ROMA CITTÀ APERTA) (1945) Edited by Jolanda Benvenuti Directed by Roberto Rossellini 13 ENAMORADA (1946) Edited by Gloria Schoemann Directed by Emilio Fernández 14 THE LADY FROM SHANGHAI (1947) Edited by Viola Lawrence Directed by Orson Welles 15 LOUISIANA STORY (1948) Edited by Helen van Dongen Directed by Robert Flaherty 16 ALL ABOUT EVE (1950) Edited by Barbara “Bobbie” McLean Directed by Joseph L. Mankiewicz 17 SINGIN’ IN THE RAIN (1952) Edited by Adrienne Fazan Directed by Stanley Donen and Gene Kelly 18 THE 400 BLOWS (LES QUATRE CENTS COUPS) (1959) Edited by Marie-Josèphe Yoyotte, Cécile Decugis and Michèle de Possel Directed by François Truffaut 19 BREATHLESS (À BOUT DE SOUFFLE) (1960) Edited by Cécile Decugis Directed by Jean-Luc Godard 20 LAWRENCE OF ARABIA (1962) Edited by Anne V. Coates Directed by David Lean 21 KNIFE IN THE WATER (NÓZ W WODZIE) (1962) Edited by Halina Prugar-Ketling Directed by Roman Polanski 22 CONTEMPT (LE MÉPRIS) (1963) Edited by Agnès Guillemot Directed by Jean-Luc Godard 23 BAND OF OUTSIDERS (BANDE À PART) (1964) Edited by Françoise Collin Directed by Jean-Luc Godard 24 PERSONA (1966) Edited by Ulla Ryghe Directed by Ingmar Bergman 25 BONNIE AND CLYDE (1967) Edited by Dede Allen Directed by Arthur Penn 26 Z (1969) Edited by Françoise Bonnot Directed by Costa-Gavras 27 SOLARIS (SOLYARIS) (1972) Edited by Lyudmila Feiginova Directed by Andrei Tarkovsky 28 JAWS (1975) Edited by Verna Fields Directed by Steven Spielberg 29 ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO’S NEST (1975) Edited by Lynzee Klingman Directed by Miloš Forman 30 UNDERGROUND (1976) Edited by Mary Lampson Directed by Emile de Antonio 31 STAR WARS: A NEW HOPE (1977) Edited by Marcia Lucas, Richard Check and Paul Hirsch Directed by George Lucas 32 HOSPITAL (SZPITAL) (1977) Edited by Lidia Zonn Directed by Krzysztof Kieslowski 33 RAGING BULL (1980) Edited by Thelma Schoonmaker Directed by Martin Scorsese 34 VERONIKA VOSS (DIE SEHNSUCHT DER VERONIKA VOSS) (1982) Edited by Juliane Lorenz Directed by Rainer Werner Fassbinder 35 E. T. the Extraterrestrial (1982) Edited by Carol Littleton Directed by Steven Spielberg 36 FITZCARRALDO (1982) Edited by Beate Mainka-Jellinghaus Directed by Werner Herzog 37 BROADWAY DANNY ROSE (1984) Edited by Susan E. Morse Directed by Woody Allen 38 GOD’S GIFT (WEND KUUNI) (1985) Edited by Andrée Davanture Directed by Gaston Kaboré 39 MAYA ANGELOU: And Still I Rise (1985) Edited by Lillian E. Benson Directed by Bob Hercules, Rita Coburn Whack 40 CHILDREN OF A LESSER GOD (1986) Edited by Lisa Fruchtman Directed by Randa Haines 41 PLATOON (1986) Edited by Claire Simpson Directed by Oliver Stone 42 PARINDA (1989) Edited by Renu Saluja Directed by Vidhu Vinod Chopra 43 DAUGHTERS OF THE DUST (1991) Edited by Amy Linton and Joseph Burton Directed by Julie Dash 44 THE PLAYER (1992) Edited by Maysie Hoy and Geraldine Peroni Directed by Robert Altman 45 PULP FICTION (1994) Edited by Sally Menke Directed by Quentin Tarantino 46 HONEY AND ASHES (MIEL ET CENDRES) (1996) Edited by Kahéna Attia Directed by Nadia Farès 47 WALKING AND TALKING (1996) Edited by Alisa Lepselter Directed by Nicole Holofcener 48 DESTINY (AL-MASSIR) (1997) Edited by Rashida Abdel Salam Directed by Youssef Chahine 49 RUN, LOLA, RUN (LOLA RENNT) (1998) Edited by Mathilde Bonnefoy Directed by Tom Tykwer 50 MEMENTO (2000) Edited by Dody Dorn Directed by Christopher Nolan 51 MOULIN ROUGE! (2001) Edited by Jill Bilcock Directed by Baz Luhrmann 52 DOGVILLE (2003) Edited by Molly Malene Stensgaard Directed by Lars Von Trier 53 THE BOYS OF BARAKA (2005) Edited by Enat Sidi Directed by Heide Ewing & Rachel Grady 54 THE QUEEN (2006) Edited by Lucia Zucchetti Directed by Stephen Frears 55 GITMEK: MY MARLON AND BRANDO (GITMEK: BENIM MARLON VE BRANDOM) (2008) Edited by Mary Stephen Directed by Hüseyin Karabey 56 THE SECRET LIFE OF BEES (2008) Edited by Terilyn A. Shropshire Directed by Gina Prince-Bythewood 57 BREAKING BAD (2010) Edited by Kelley Dixon Directed by Rian Johnson 58 MAKING OF A MAESTRO (2010) Edited by Bina Paul Directed by Meena Narayan 59 SUPER 8 (2011) Edited by Maryann Brandon and Mary Jo Markey Directed by J.J. Abrams 60 BOYHOOD (2014) Edited by Sandra Adair Directed by Richard Linklater 61 TIMBUKTU (2014) Edited by Nadia Ben Rachid Directed by Abderrahmane Sissako 62 MAD MAX: FURY ROAD (2015) Edited by Margaret Sixel Directed by George Miller 63 ORANGE IS THE NEW BLACK Season 4, Episode 13 (2016) Edited by Shannon Mitchell Directed by Adam Bernstein 64 MOONLIGHT (2016) Edited by Joi McMillon and Nate Sanders Directed by Barry Jenkins 65 BATTLE OF THE SEXES (2017) Edited by Pamela Martin Directed by Jonathan Dayton ************************************* http://womenfilmeditors.princeton.edu/edit-by-the-companion-film/ This version of the film was compiled in December 2018 by Su Friedrich .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pietro Scalia
    Pietro Scalia Pietro Scalia werd op 17 maart 1960 geboren in Catania. Terwijl hij binnen de Amerikaanse film actief was vermengde hij tijden van filmmontage met de visuele en geluidsritmes van andere moderne media (videoclips, nieuws, digitaal) daarbij de natuurlijkheid benadrukkend van het acteerspel van de acteurs en in zijn vak een bewustere blik introducerend die dicht(er)bij het gezichtspunt van de regie ligt. Hij werd opgeleid in de werkgroep van Oliver Stone en werkte vervolgens voornamelijk samen met Ridley Scott. Hij won twee Oscars, in 1992 (samen met Joe Hutshing) voor Stone's JFK (1991; JFK - A Case Still Open) en 2002 voor Scott's Black hawk down (2001) en twee nominaties, in 1998 voor Good Will Hunting (1997) van Gus Van Sante en in 2001 voor Scott's Gladiator (2000). Hij won ook twee keer de BAFTA Award en drie keer de Eddie Award, uitgereikt door American Cinema Editors. Op éénjarige leeftijd verhuisde hij met zijn familie naar Zwitserland, waar hij zijn basis- en middelbare school volgde. In 1978 ging hij naar de Verenigde Staten om film te studeren; na twee jaar aan de State University of New York in Albany volgde hij regie- en productiecursussen aan de University of California in Los Angeles waar hij in 1985 zijn master in Film and Theatre Arts behaalde. Hij maakte zijn filmdebuut als assistent van filmmonteur Alain Jakubowicz in de postproductie van Andrei Michalkov Končalovskij's Shy people (1987). Gefascineerd als hij was door de films van Oliver Stone's voegde hij zich bij diens postproductieteam en werkte zo als assistent van Claire Simpson in Wall Street (1987) en van David Brenner en Joe Hutshing voor Talk radio (1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Rape and the Virgin Spring Abstract
    Silence and Fury: Rape and The Virgin Spring Alexandra Heller-Nicholas Abstract This article is a reconsideration of The Virgin Spring that focuses upon the rape at the centre of the film’s action, despite the film’s surface attempts to marginalise all but its narrative functionality. While the deployment of this rape supports critical observations that rape on-screen commonly underscores the seriousness of broader thematic concerns, it is argued that the visceral impact of this brutal scene actively undermines its narrative intent. No matter how central the journey of the vengeful father’s mission from vengeance to redemption is to the story, this ultimately pales next to the shocking impact of the rape and murder of the girl herself. James R. Alexander identifies Ingmar Bergman’s The Virgin Spring as “the basic template” for the contemporary rape-revenge film[1 ], and despite spawning a vast range of imitations[2 ], the film stands as a major entry in the canon of European art cinema. Yet while the sumptuous black and white cinematography of long-time Bergman collaborator Sven Nykvist combined with lead actor Max von Sydow’s trademark icy sobriety to garner it the Academy Award for Best Foreign film in 1960, even fifty years later the film’s representation of the rape and murder of a young girl remain shocking. The film evokes a range of issues that have been critically debated: What is its placement in a more general auteurist treatment of Bergman? What is its influence on later rape-revenge films? How does it fit into a broader understanding of Swedish national cinema, or European art film in general? But while the film hinges around the rape and murder, that act more often than not is of critical interest only in how it functions in these more dominant debates.
    [Show full text]
  • FILM REVIEW Moonlight, Directed by Barry Jenkins, USA, Altitude Films
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF JUNGIAN STUDIES, 2018 VOL. 10, NO. 1, 83–89 FILM REVIEW Moonlight, directed by Barry Jenkins, USA, Altitude Films, 2016, 1 hour 55 minutes Spring is often synonymous with Oscar season, but it is some considered reflection on the 2017 Best Picture that is necessary one year on. If it is news to you that Moonlight won the Oscar last year, then you are not alone. It is certainly among the least-marketed Oscar winners in recent decades. If you do know about the film, it is likely that it is in the context of its two-way fight for the prize with another more popular film, or perhaps from news coverage of a dramatic mishap on Oscars’ night. The film was the modern musical La La Land and the mix-up was the result of the wrong envelope being given and that the film’s name being read out instead of the winner Moonlight. A male employee from PricewaterhouseCooper’s – who administer the envelopes – is thought to have mistakenly given a duplicate Best Actress envelope (already won by Emma Stone for La La Land) to Warren Beatty. In a familiar commentary on the expectations social media places on creative industries personnel, it is possible the employee, Brian Cullinan, could have been distracted by his Tweeted picture of Stone moments before handing over the envelope. The event overshadowed much mainstream serious discussion of the film and did little to tempt staunch supporters of La La Land to see it. There are films that are designed to win Oscars and appeal to the middle-range, but it is difficult to suggest Moonlight is one of them, even with some of its missed opportunities to push the envelope of homosexual encoun- ters than those previously seen on mainstream US silver screens.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgiving Blue
    THE FORGIVING BLUE Lynn Fong nterspersed in the gentle lapping of ocean waves, a few tense notes of a violin crescendo as Chiron, the protagonist of Barry Jenkins’s film Moonlight , learns to swim. The water is a soft turquoise. The camera bobs along with it, pulled up and down Iand sometimes partially obscured by the waves. We, the audience, are right there with little Chiron as he experiences the waters of Miami for the first time. Juan, Chiron’s newfound, unlikely mentor, is hold - ing up Chiron’s small head while he teaches him to float. “You’re in the middle of the world,” Juan tells Chiron. The two are framed only by the turquoise water and a light blue sky. Juan demonstrates arm movements: “Go like this,” he instructs, “more athletic.” Chiron mimics him as he learns to paddle. Finally, Juan releases Chiron so he can swim on his own. “Go,” Juan says, and Chiron begins paddling by himself. Then, Chiron is alone. The music slows and fades away. He is indeed in the middle of the world as he swims, unaccompanied, unafraid, and free. Moonlight , which won the Academy Award for Best Picture in 2017, is a coming-of-age story. More specifically, it documents three stages in the life of Chiron, a young, gay black man growing up in an impoverished area of Miami. Even more specifically, the film offers an empathetic lens into the most intimate, defining moments of Chiron’s life: learning how to swim, putting a blanket on his drugged- out mother, reuniting with someone he’s loved after years of estrange - ment.
    [Show full text]
  • CELEBRATING FORTY YEARS of FILMS WORTH TALKING ABOUT 39 Years, 2 Months, and Counting…
    5 JAN 18 1 FEB 18 1 | 5 JAN 18 - 1 FEB 18 88 LOTHIAN ROAD | FILMHOUSECinema.COM CELEBRATING FORTY YEARS OF FILMS WORTH TALKING ABOUT 39 Years, 2 Months, and counting… As you’ll spot deep within this programme (and hinted at on the front cover) January 2018 sees the start of a series of films that lead up to celebrations in October marking the 40th birthday of Filmhouse as a public cinema on Lothian Road. We’ve chosen to screen a film from every year we’ve been bringing the very best cinema to the good people of Edinburgh, and while it is tremendous fun looking back through the history of what has shown here, it was quite an undertaking going through all the old programmes and choosing what to show, and a bit of a personal journey for me as one who started coming here as a customer in the mid-80s (I know, I must have started very young...). At that time, I’d no idea that Filmhouse had only been in existence for less than 10 years – it seemed like such an established, essential institution and impossible to imagine it not existing in a city such as Edinburgh. My only hope is that the cinema is as important today as I felt it was then, and that the giants on whose shoulders we currently stand feel we’re worthy of their legacy. I hope you can join us for at least some of the screenings on this trip down memory lane... And now, back to the now.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Acting Matters Yale
    why acting matters Yale University Press New Haven and London David Thomson Why Acting Matters “Why X Matters” Published with assistance from the foundation and the yX logo are established in memory of Henry Weldon Barnes registered trademarks of the Class of 1882, Yale College. of Yale University. Yale University Press books may be purchased in Copyright © quantity for educational, business, or promotional 2015 by David use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] Thomson. (U.S. office) or [email protected] (U.K. office). All rights reserved. Set in Times Roman and Adobe Garamond types by This book may not Integrated Publishing Solutions. be reproduced, Printed in the United States of America. in whole or in part, including Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data illustrations, in any Thomson, David, 1941–. Why acting matters / David form (beyond that Thomson. copying permitted by pages cm—(Why X matters) Sections 107 and 108 Includes bibliographical references. of the U.S. Copy- ISBN 978-0-300-19578-1 (cloth : alk. right Law and except paper) 1. Acting. I. Title. by reviewers for the PN2061.T525 2015 public press), without 792.0298—dc23 written permission 2014029867 from the publishers. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Also by David Thomson The New Biographical Dictionary of Film (sixth edition, 2014; first edition, as A Biographical Dictionary of Film, 1975) Moments That Made the Movies (2013) The Big Screen: The Story of the Movies (2012) Try to Tell the Story: A Memoir (2009) The Moment of Psycho: How Alfred Hitchcock Taught America to Love Murder (2009) “Have You Seen .
    [Show full text]
  • Café Society
    Presents CAFÉ SOCIETY A film by Woody Allen (96 min., USA, 2016) Language: English Distribution Publicity Bonne Smith Star PR 1352 Dundas St. West Tel: 416-488-4436 Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6J 1Y2 Fax: 416-488-8438 Tel: 416-516-9775 Fax: 416-516-0651 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] www.mongrelmedia.com @MongrelMedia MongrelMedia CAFÉ SOCIETY Starring (in alphabetical order) Rose JEANNIE BERLIN Phil STEVE CARELL Bobby JESSE EISENBERG Veronica BLAKE LIVELY Rad PARKER POSEY Vonnie KRISTEN STEWART Ben COREY STOLL Marty KEN STOTT Co-starring (in alphabetical order) Candy ANNA CAMP Leonard STEPHEN KUNKEN Evelyn SARI LENNICK Steve PAUL SCHNEIDER Filmmakers Writer/Director WOODY ALLEN Producers LETTY ARONSON, p.g.a. STEPHEN TENENBAUM, p.g.a. EDWARD WALSON, p.g.a. Co-Producer HELEN ROBIN Executive Producers ADAM B. STERN MARC I. STERN Executive Producer RONALD L. CHEZ Cinematographer VITTORIO STORARO AIC, ASC Production Designer SANTO LOQUASTO Editor ALISA LEPSELTER ACE Costume Design SUZY BENZINGER Casting JULIET TAYLOR PATRICIA DiCERTO 2 CAFÉ SOCIETY Synopsis Set in the 1930s, Woody Allen’s bittersweet romance CAFÉ SOCIETY follows Bronx-born Bobby Dorfman (Jesse Eisenberg) to Hollywood, where he falls in love, and back to New York, where he is swept up in the vibrant world of high society nightclub life. Centering on events in the lives of Bobby’s colorful Bronx family, the film is a glittering valentine to the movie stars, socialites, playboys, debutantes, politicians, and gangsters who epitomized the excitement and glamour of the age. Bobby’s family features his relentlessly bickering parents Rose (Jeannie Berlin) and Marty (Ken Stott), his casually amoral gangster brother Ben (Corey Stoll); his good-hearted teacher sister Evelyn (Sari Lennick), and her egghead husband Leonard (Stephen Kunken).
    [Show full text]
  • Promotion 2017 Après Avoir Présenté Leur Court Métrage À Verte De Talents Émergents Par Un Accom- Cannes En Mai, Les Cinéastes Sont Invités À Pagnement Sur Mesure
    Promotion #4 2017 Next Step accueille sa 4e promotion travers son programme Next Step, la formation, le Moulin d’Andé-CÉCI propose À Semaine de la Critique accompagne une résidence d’écriture d’un mois à l’un des vers le long métrage, les réalisateurs sélec- réalisateurs participants et le TorinoFilmLab tionnés pour sa compétition courts mé- invite le producteur de l’un des projets à trages parmi les 1 700 films soumis chaque prendre part à son programme Up&Coming. année. Cette sélection prend le pari que chacun de ces films courts révèle une person- Avec Next Step, la Semaine de la Critique nalité de cinéma qui ambitionne de place le cinéaste et la mise-en-scène au cœur s’exprimer sur le format long. du processus de développement d’un long métrage et prolonge son travail de décou- Promotion 2017 Après avoir présenté leur court métrage à verte de talents émergents par un accom- Cannes en mai, les cinéastes sont invités à pagnement sur mesure. À ce jour, 29 #4 4 – 8 Décembre participer à Next Step au Moulin d’Andé en réalisateurs ont bénéficié du soutien de décembre. Durant cet atelier de formation Next Step et nous nous réjouissons du d’une semaine organisé en collaboration parcours des 3 premiers films terminés : The avec le TorinoFilmLab, ils sont accompagnés Maus de Gerardo Herrero (Festivals de Sitges dans le développement de leur long métrage et Austin), Guarda In Alto (Look Up) de Fulvio par des consultants internationaux qui les Risuelo (Festival de Rome) et A Ciambra de conseillent à la fois sur l’écriture de leur Jonas Carpignano (Quinzaine des Réalisateurs scénario et son lancement sur le marché.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminsterresearch the Artist Biopic
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch The artist biopic: a historical analysis of narrative cinema, 1934- 2010 Bovey, D. This is an electronic version of a PhD thesis awarded by the University of Westminster. © Mr David Bovey, 2015. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: ((http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] 1 THE ARTIST BIOPIC: A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF NARRATIVE CINEMA, 1934-2010 DAVID ALLAN BOVEY A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Westminster for the degree of Master of Philosophy December 2015 2 ABSTRACT The thesis provides an historical overview of the artist biopic that has emerged as a distinct sub-genre of the biopic as a whole, totalling some ninety films from Europe and America alone since the first talking artist biopic in 1934. Their making usually reflects a determination on the part of the director or star to see the artist as an alter-ego. Many of them were adaptations of successful literary works, which tempted financial backers by having a ready-made audience based on a pre-established reputation. The sub-genre’s development is explored via the grouping of films with associated themes and the use of case studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy Fool in Late Tarkovsky
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Nebraska, Omaha Journal of Religion & Film Volume 18 | Issue 1 Article 45 3-31-2014 The olH y Fool in Late Tarkovsky Robert O. Efird Virginia Tech, [email protected] Recommended Citation Efird, Robert O. (2014) "The oH ly Fool in Late Tarkovsky," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 18 : Iss. 1 , Article 45. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol18/iss1/45 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The olH y Fool in Late Tarkovsky Abstract This article analyzes the Russian cultural and religious phenomenon of holy foolishness (iurodstvo) in director Andrei Tarkovsky’s last two films, Nostalghia and Sacrifice. While traits of the holy fool appear in various characters throughout the director’s oeuvre, a marked change occurs in the films made outside the Soviet Union. Coincident with the films’ increasing disregard for spatiotemporal consistency and sharper eschatological focus, the character of the fool now appears to veer off into genuine insanity, albeit with a seemingly greater sensitivity to a visionary or virtual world of the spirit and explicit messianic task. Keywords Andrei Tarkovsky, Sacrifice, Nostalghia, Holy Foolishness Author Notes Robert Efird is Assistant Professor of Russian at Virginia Tech. He holds a PhD in Slavic from the University of Virginia and is the author of a number of articles dealing with Russian and Soviet cinema.
    [Show full text]
  • Vicky Cristina Barcelona: Fotos Y Pasión En La Ciudad Condal
    VICKY CRISTINA BARCELONA: FOTOS Y PASIÓN EN LA CIUDAD CONDAL Por ALBERT ELDUQUE Título original: Vicky Cristina Barcelona Producción: Mediapro (USA-España, 2008). Productores: Letty Aronson, Stephen Tenenbaum, Gareth Wiley y Jaume Roures. Director: Woody Allen. Guión: Woody Allen. Fotografía: Javier Aguirresarobe. Diseño de producción: Alain Bainée. Montaje: Alisa Lepselter. Intérpretes: Rebecca Hall (Vicky), Scarlett Johansson (Cristina), Javier Bardem (Juan Antonio), Penélope Cruz (María Elena), Chris Messina (Doug) Color - 96 minutos - Estreno en España: 19-IX-2008. Galardonado con un Oscar de la Academia de Hollywood recientemente y gozando de una gran popularidad, la situación actual de Javier Bardem es interesante. Entre las producciones estadounidenses y las españolas, entre No Country For Old Men y Mar Adentro, últimamente trabaja precisamente en los híbridos entre lo internacional y las raíces, participando en producciones de directores extranjeros en España, ya sean Los fantasmas de Goya, de Milos Forman, o Biutiful, el proyecto de Alejandro González Iñárritu situado en el Raval barcelonés. Obviamente, la última película de Woody Allen, Vicky Cristina Barcelona, se inscribe en esta línea de conjunción internacional, y lo hace también con Penélope Cruz, otra actriz situada entre los proyectos americanos y las películas españolas. Cabe preguntarse por qué en una película dedicada desde el título a Barcelona los dos únicos personajes españoles relevantes son estrellas internacionales, y por qué los actores locales que han participado en el filme han sido apartados hacia roles muy secundarios (Josep Maria Domènech, como el padre del personaje de Bardem) o directamente anecdóticos (Abel Folk, Lloll Bertran, etc.). Hay en Vicky Cristina Barcelona un encuentro cultural en el equipo técnico que no se llega a plasmar en el reparto, basado en intérpretes anglosajones o estrellas latinas ya consolidadas.
    [Show full text]
  • W Talking Pictures
    Wednesday 3 June at 20.30 (Part I) Wednesday 17 June at 20.30 Thursday 4 June at 20.30 (Part II) Francis Ford Coppola Ingmar Bergman Apocalypse Now (US) 1979 Fanny And Alexander (Sweden) 1982 “One of the great films of all time. It shames modern Hollywood’s “This exuberant, richly textured film, timidity. To watch it is to feel yourself lifted up to the heights where packed with life and incident, is the cinema can take you, but so rarely does.” (Roger Ebert, Chicago punctuated by a series of ritual family Sun-Times) “To look at APOCALYPSE NOW is to realize that most of us are gatherings for parties, funerals, weddings, fast forgetting what a movie looks like - a real movie, the last movie, and christenings. Ghosts are as corporeal an American masterpiece.” (Manohla Darghis, LA Weekly) “Remains a as living people. Seasons come and go; majestic explosion of pure cinema. It’s a hallucinatory poem of fear, tumultuous, traumatic events occur - projecting, in its scale and spirit, a messianic vision of human warfare Talking yet, as in a dream of childhood (the film’s stretched to the flashpoint of technological and moral breakdown.” perspective is that of Alexander), time is (Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly) “In spite of its limited oddly still.” (Philip French, The Observer) perspective on Vietnam, its churning, term-paperish exploration of “Emerges as a sumptuously produced Conrad and the near incoherence of its ending, it is a great movie. It Pictures period piece that is also a rich tapestry of grows richer and stranger with each viewing, and the restoration [in childhood memoirs and moods, fear and Redux] of scenes left in the cutting room two decades ago has only April - July 2009 fancy, employing all the manners and added to its sublimity.” (Dana Stevens, The New York Times) Audience means of the best of cinematic theatrical can choose the original version or the longer 2001 Redux version.
    [Show full text]