Podostemum Ceratophyllum and Patterns of Fish Occurrence and Richness in a Southern Appalachian River

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Podostemum Ceratophyllum and Patterns of Fish Occurrence and Richness in a Southern Appalachian River PODOSTEMUM CERATOPHYLLUM AND PATTERNS OF FISH OCCURRENCE AND RICHNESS IN A SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN RIVER by JANE ELIZABETH ARGENTINA B.S. Tufts University, 2000 (under the direction of Mary C. Freeman) ABSTRACT We estimated percent cover of Podostemum ceratophyllum Michx. and fish richness at twenty randomly selected shoals within a 42 kilometer reach of the Conasauga River to determine if changes in species richness or species presence are related to variable levels of P. ceratophyllum coverage. We also assessed fish behavioral shifts with changes in P. ceratophyllum coverage in an experimental study. P. ceratophyllum was correlated positively with increasing bed sediment sizes and decreasing canopy cover, and negatively associated with drainage area. Fish species richness peaked in the center portion of the study reach, declining further downstream, coincident with range contraction of six lotic fishes. Benthic insectivorous fishes showed significant preference for habitat with increased P. ceratophyllum coverage compared with low coverage. River-wide changes in P. ceratophyllum could influence fish productivity through lower insect biomass and abundances, although water quality may have a greater effect on fish abundance and persistence. INDEX WORDS: Conasauga River, Podostemum ceratophyllum, fish richness, shoal, turbidity, drainage area, benthic insectivores, experimental manipulation, aquatic macrophytes ii PODOSTEMUM CERATOPHYLLUM AND PATTERNS OF FISH OCCURRENCE AND RICHNESS IN A SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN RIVER by JANE ELIZABETH ARGENTINA B.S. Tufts University, 2000 (under the direction of Mary C. Freeman) ABSTRACT A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GA 2006 iii © 2006 JANE ELIZABETH ARGENTINA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iv PODOSTEMUM CERATOPHYLLUM AND PATTERNS OF FISH OCCURRENCE AND RICHNESS IN A SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN RIVER by JANE ELIZABETH ARGENTINA Major Professor: Mary C. Freeman Committee: Byron J. Freeman Judy L. Meyer Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2006 viv Acknowledgements This work is a combined effort of many people, with which I was able to complete this thesis. I’d really like to thank Mary Freeman, my committee Judy Meyer and Bud Freeman who inspire me to know more about our aquatic environments. Thanks to the Freeman lab, and the host of people who helped in the field and in the lab. Thanks to my family, and especially my Vinny, for all their love and support. Benjamin Petty, Chris Petty, Dr. Goode and Dalton Utilities who gave us access to the river, without which this work could not have been done. Funding was provided by the Georgia DNR under Section 6 of the Endangered Species Act. viv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………… iv CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………….. 1 2. HABITAT AND LANDSCPE EFFECTS ON DISTRIBUTION OF A BENTHIC MACROPHYTE, PODOSTEMUM CERATOPHYLLUM, IN A SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN RIVER, AND ASSOCIATIONS WITH LOTIC FISHES…………………………………………………....…... 5 3. BENTHIC FISH RESPONSE TO EXPERIMENTALLY MANIPULATED DENSITY OF AN AQUATIC MACROPHYTE, PODOSTEMUM CERATOPHYLLUM......................................................75 4. CONCLUSIONS…………………………………………………...........101 APPENDICES A. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL FOR CHAPTER 2………………103 B. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL FOR CHAPTER 3………………107 1 Chapter One Introduction Species richness is shaped by the landscape and the riverscape at multiple scales in river systems. Benthic habitat structure and heterogeneity, in particular, can strongly influence local abundances of riverine biota. Aquatic plants are important habitat features for biota inhabiting low velocity areas such as sea grass beds (Heck and Wetstone 1977, Heck and Crowder 1991), lake edges (Werner and Hall 1988), and river margins (Newman 1991, Fritz et al. 2004). I have focused on a submerged aquatic plant, Podostemum ceratophyllum Michx., that is known to provide heterogeneous habitat to aquatic macroinvertebrates (Nelson and Scott 1962, Hutchens et al. 2004), and with which a number of benthic fishes have been reported to associate (Etnier and Starnes 1993, Marcinek 2003, Hagler 2006). P. ceratophyllum (Podostemaceae) is a completely submerged filamentous dicotyledon without true roots; it occurs in high gradient upland waters such as Appalachian streams and rivers (Hutchens et al. 2004, Hagler 2006), and shoal and riffle habitat of Piedmont rivers (Mullholland and Lenat 1992, Nelson and Scott 1962, Grubaugh and Wallace 1995, Marcinek 2003, Fritz et al. 2004). It characteristically occurs in fast-flowing waters where it attaches with hyphae to the surface of rocks. By increasing surface area, reducing scour, and increasing availability of organic matter and epiphytic periphyton, P. ceratophyllum enhances benthic habitat for aquatic invertebrates (Grubaugh and Wallace 1995, Hutchens et al. 2004), and may do the same for riverine fishes. In an observational study (Chapter 2), I have examined longitudinal patterns of occurrence of P. ceratophyllum and of fishes in relation to natural features and land use 2 in a biologically diverse southeastern Appalachian river. Specifically, I have evaluated relationships between P. ceratophyllum and habitat variables measured at three scales – local (i.e., habitat at the point of observation), shoal (channel slope, canopy cover) and landscape (drainage area, land use upstream and in the riparian buffer). I have also assessed relations between the longitudinal distribution of P. ceratophyllum in the Conasauga River and (1) fish species richness and (2) occurrence probabilities for lotic fish species, using survey methods that account for incomplete species detectabilities (Nichols et al. 1998, MacKenzie et al. 2002). In an experimental study (Chapter 3), I tested the influence of P. ceratophyllum on benthic fish habitat use. Benthic habitats provide protection from predators and refugia from high velocities for a broad range of aquatic animals. Benthic aquatic macroinvertebrate biomass generally increases in areas with complex habitats, including heterogenous bed sediments, woody debris and aquatic plants (Rabeni and Minshall 1977, Anderson et al. 1978, Allan 1995, Meyer et al. 1997). I expected that benthic insectivorous fishes would show a behavioral response to increased coverage of P. ceratophyllum and that this response may be due to increases in food availability. To test for a behavioral response by benthic fishes, I manipulated P. ceratophyllum cover and quantified fish abundances, as well as insect density and biomass, two weeks after the manipulation, in two experimental patches measuring about 30 m2. Together these observational and experimental studies provide new data and insights on factors controlling abundance of P. ceratophyllum and fish responses to macrophyte coverage at shoal and local habitat scales. 3 Literature Cited Allan, J. D. 1995. Stream Ecology. Kluwer Publishers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Anderson, N.H., J.R. Sedell, L.M. Roberts and F.J. Triska. 1978. The role of aquatic invertebrates in processing of wood debris in coniferous forest streams. American Midland Naturalist 100(1): 64-82. Etnier, D.A. and W.C. Starnes. 1993. The Fishes of Tennessee. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville. Fritz, K.M., M.M. Gangloff, and J.W. Feminella. 2004. Habitat modification by the stream macrophyte Justicia americana and its effects on biota. Oecologia 140: 388-397. Grubaugh, J.W. and J.B. Wallace. 1995. Functional structure and production of the benthic community in a Piedmont river: 1956-1957 and 1991-1992. Limnology and Oceanography 40(3):490-501. Hagler, M.M. 2006. Effects of natural flow variability over seven years on the occurrence of shoal-dependent fishes in the Etowah River. M.S. Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, GA. Heck, K.L.J. and L.B. Crowder. 1991. Habitat structure and predator-prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems. In: Bell, S.S., E.D. McCoy and H.R. Mushinsky (eds) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall. London, pp. 281-299. Heck, K.L.J. and G.S. Wetstone. 1977. Habitat complexity and invertebrate species richness and abundance in tropical seagrass meadows. Journal of Biogeography 4:135-142. 4 Hutchens, J.J., J.B. Wallace, and E.C. Romaniszyn. 2004. Role of Podostemum ceratophyllum Michx. in structuring benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in a southern Appalachian river. Journal of North American Benthological Society 23(4):713-727. Marcinek, P.A. 2003. Variation of fish assemblages and species abundances in the upper Flint River shoals, Georgia. M.S. Thesis. University of Georgia, Athens, GA. Meyer, J.L., A.C. Benke, R.T. Edwards, and J.B. Wallace. 1997. Organic matter dynamics in the Ogeechee River, a blackwater river in Georgia, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 82-87. Mullholland, P.J. and D.R. Lenat. 1992. Streams of the southeastern Piedmont, Atlantic drainage. In C.T. Hackney, S.M. Adams and W.H. Martin (eds.), Biodiversity of the southeastern United States: aquatic communities. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. pp. 193 – 232. Nelson, D.J. and D.C. Scott. 1962. Role of detritus in the productivity of a rock-outcrop community in a Piedmont stream. Limnology and Oceanography 7: 396-413. Newman, R.M. 1991. Herbivory and detritivory on fresh-water macrophytes by invertebrates - a review. Journal of the North American Benthological
Recommended publications
  • ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES
    ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES Tables STEPHEN T. ROSS University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California ISBN 978-0-520-24945-5 uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 1 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 2 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 1.1 Families Composing 95% of North American Freshwater Fish Species Ranked by the Number of Native Species Number Cumulative Family of species percent Cyprinidae 297 28 Percidae 186 45 Catostomidae 71 51 Poeciliidae 69 58 Ictaluridae 46 62 Goodeidae 45 66 Atherinopsidae 39 70 Salmonidae 38 74 Cyprinodontidae 35 77 Fundulidae 34 80 Centrarchidae 31 83 Cottidae 30 86 Petromyzontidae 21 88 Cichlidae 16 89 Clupeidae 10 90 Eleotridae 10 91 Acipenseridae 8 92 Osmeridae 6 92 Elassomatidae 6 93 Gobiidae 6 93 Amblyopsidae 6 94 Pimelodidae 6 94 Gasterosteidae 5 95 source: Compiled primarily from Mayden (1992), Nelson et al. (2004), and Miller and Norris (2005). uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 3 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 3.1 Biogeographic Relationships of Species from a Sample of Fishes from the Ouachita River, Arkansas, at the Confl uence with the Little Missouri River (Ross, pers. observ.) Origin/ Pre- Pleistocene Taxa distribution Source Highland Stoneroller, Campostoma spadiceum 2 Mayden 1987a; Blum et al. 2008; Cashner et al. 2010 Blacktail Shiner, Cyprinella venusta 3 Mayden 1987a Steelcolor Shiner, Cyprinella whipplei 1 Mayden 1987a Redfi n Shiner, Lythrurus umbratilis 4 Mayden 1987a Bigeye Shiner, Notropis boops 1 Wiley and Mayden 1985; Mayden 1987a Bullhead Minnow, Pimephales vigilax 4 Mayden 1987a Mountain Madtom, Noturus eleutherus 2a Mayden 1985, 1987a Creole Darter, Etheostoma collettei 2a Mayden 1985 Orangebelly Darter, Etheostoma radiosum 2a Page 1983; Mayden 1985, 1987a Speckled Darter, Etheostoma stigmaeum 3 Page 1983; Simon 1997 Redspot Darter, Etheostoma artesiae 3 Mayden 1985; Piller et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Part IV: Scoring Criteria for the Index of Biotic Integrity to Monitor
    Part IV: Scoring Criteria for the Index of Biotic Integrity to Monitor Fish Communities in Wadeable Streams in the Coosa and Tennessee Drainage Basins of the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion of Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division Fisheries Management Section 2020 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………… ……... Pg. 1 Map of Ridge and Valley Ecoregion………………………………..……............... Pg. 3 Table 1. State Listed Fish in the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion……………………. Pg. 4 Table 2. IBI Metrics and Scoring Criteria………………………………………….Pg. 5 References………………………………………………….. ………………………Pg. 7 Appendix 1…………………………………………………………………. ………Pg. 8 Coosa Basin Group (ACT) MSR Graphs..………………………………….Pg. 9 Tennessee Basin Group (TEN) MSR Graphs……………………………….Pg. 17 Ridge and Valley Ecoregion Fish List………………………………………Pg. 25 i Introduction The Ridge and Valley ecoregion is one of the six Level III ecoregions found in Georgia (Part 1, Figure 1). It is drained by two major river basins, the Coosa and the Tennessee, in the northwestern corner of Georgia. The Ridge and Valley ecoregion covers nearly 3,000 square miles (United States Census Bureau 2000) and includes all or portions of 10 counties (Figure 1), bordering the Piedmont ecoregion to the south and the Blue Ridge ecoregion to the east. A small portion of the Southwestern Appalachians ecoregion is located in the upper northwestern corner of the Ridge and Valley ecoregion. The biotic index developed by the GAWRD is based on Level III ecoregion delineations (Griffith et al. 2001). The metrics and scoring criteria adapted to the Ridge and Valley ecoregion were developed from biomonitoring samples collected in the two major river basins that drain the Ridge and Valley ecoregion, the Coosa (ACT) and the Tennessee (TEN).
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey of Alabama Calibration of The
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA Berry H. (Nick) Tew, Jr. State Geologist WATER INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM CALIBRATION OF THE INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY FOR THE SOUTHERN PLAINS ICHTHYOREGION IN ALABAMA OPEN-FILE REPORT 0908 by Patrick E. O'Neil and Thomas E. Shepard Prepared in cooperation with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management and the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Tuscaloosa, Alabama 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................ 1 Introduction.......................................................... 1 Acknowledgments .................................................... 6 Objectives........................................................... 7 Study area .......................................................... 7 Southern Plains ichthyoregion ...................................... 7 Methods ............................................................ 8 IBI sample collection ............................................. 8 Habitat measures............................................... 10 Habitat metrics ........................................... 12 The human disturbance gradient ................................... 15 IBI metrics and scoring criteria..................................... 19 Designation of guilds....................................... 20 Results and discussion................................................ 22 Sampling sites and collection results . 22 Selection and scoring of Southern Plains IBI metrics . 41 1. Number of native species ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE ECOLOGICAL ROLES of Podostemum Ceratophyllum and Cladophora in the HABITAT and DIETARY PREFERENCES of the RIVERINE CADDISFLY Hydropsyche Simulans
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Honors College at WKU Projects Spring 5-2012 The cologE ical Roles Of Podostemum ceratophyllum and Cladophora in the Habitat and Dietary Preferences of the Riverine Caddisfly Hydropsyche Simulans Brenna Tinsley Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses Part of the Biology Commons, Plant Sciences Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Tinsley, Brenna, "The cE ological Roles Of Podostemum ceratophyllum and Cladophora in the Habitat and Dietary Preferences of the Riverine Caddisfly yH dropsyche Simulans" (2012). Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Projects. Paper 359. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses/359 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College Capstone Experience/ Thesis Projects by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ECOLOGICAL ROLES OF Podostemum ceratophyllum AND Cladophora IN THE HABITAT AND DIETARY PREFERENCES OF THE RIVERINE CADDISFLY Hydropsyche simulans A Capstone Experience/Thesis Project Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Science with Honors College Graduate Distinction at Western Kentucky University By Brenna E. Tinsley *** Western Kentucky University 2012 CE/T Committee: Approved By Professor Scott Grubbs, Advisor ____________________________ Professor Albert Meier Advisor Professor Ingrid Cartwright Department of Biology Copyright by Brenna E. Tinsley 2012 ABSTRACT The net-spinning caddisfly Hydropsyche simulans can be a common inhabitant of shallow reaches in riverine systems, and is easily the most common hydropsychid in the upper Green River, Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey of Alabama Calibration of The
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA Berry H. (Nick) Tew, Jr. State Geologist ECOSYSTEMS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM CALIBRATION OF THE INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY FOR THE SOUTHERN PLAINS ICHTHYOREGION IN ALABAMA OPEN-FILE REPORT 1210 by Patrick E. O'Neil and Thomas E. Shepard Prepared in cooperation with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management and the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Tuscaloosa, Alabama 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................ 1 Introduction.......................................................... 2 Acknowledgments .................................................... 6 Objectives........................................................... 7 Study area .......................................................... 7 Southern Plains ichthyoregion ...................................... 7 Methods ............................................................ 9 IBI sample collection ............................................. 9 Habitat measures............................................... 11 Habitat metrics ........................................... 12 The human disturbance gradient ................................... 16 IBI metrics and scoring criteria..................................... 20 Designation of guilds....................................... 21 Results and discussion................................................ 23 Sampling sites and collection results . 23 Selection and scoring of Southern Plains IBI metrics . 48 Metrics selected for the
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Is Recorded in a Decision Notice
    Environmental United States Department of Assessment Agriculture Forest Service Vegetation Management in Open Areas November 2017 Ocoee Ranger District, Polk and McMinn Counties, Tennessee Tellico Ranger District, Monroe County, Tennessee Unaka Ranger District, Cocke and Greene Counties Watauga Ranger District, Carter, Johnson, Sullivan, Unicoi and Washington Counties, Tennessee For Information Contact: Mary Miller 2800 Ocoee Street North Cleveland, TN 37312 423-476-9700 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents Glossary, Acronyms and Abbreviations ...........................................................1 Introduction .........................................................................................................7 Document Structure .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Equipment & Supplies
    National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018/19 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1 April 2018 Appendix A: Equipment & Supplies T & SUPPLIES & T APPENDIX A: EQUIPMEN A: APPENDIX A-1 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018/19 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1 April 2018 T & SUPPLIES & T APPENDIX A: EQUIPMEN A: APPENDIX A-2 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018/19 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1 April 2018 Base Kit A Base Kit will be provided to the field crews for all sampling sites that they will go to. Some items are sent in the base kit as extra supplies to be used as needed. Base Kit Item Quantity Protocol Antibiotic Salve 1 Fish Plug Aspirator bulb 1 Fish Plug Beaker (3 L, Nalgene) 1 Water Chemistry Centrifuge tube stand 1 Chlorophyll A Centrifuge tubes (sterile, green screw-top, 50-mL) (10/pack) 1 pack Chlorophyll A Periphyton Chlorophyll bottle (2 L, brown) 1 Chlorophyll A Clinometer† 1 Physical Habitat Compass† 1 Physical Habitat Delimiter – 12 cm2 area 1 Periphyton Densiometer - Convex spherical (modified with taped V)† 1 Physical Habitat D-frame Kick Net (500 µm mesh, 52” handle) † 1 Benthics Dry ice label (Class 9)* 5 Shipping Electrical tape - roll* 1 General FedEx labels, 5 sets of each in file folder (T1, T2, T3, T5)* 1 Shipping Filtration chamber adapter 3 Enterococci, Chlorophyll A, Periphyton Filtration flask 1 Enterococci, Chlorophyll A, Periphyton Filtration flask stopper (silicone, blue) 2 Enterococci, Chlorophyll A, Periphyton Filtration unit (sterile 250 ml funnel, cap and filter holder) - spares 5 Enterococci,
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics and Biogeography of the Clusioid Clade (Malpighiales) Brad R
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Biological Sciences Faculty and Staff Research Biological Sciences January 2011 Systematics and Biogeography of the Clusioid Clade (Malpighiales) Brad R. Ruhfel Eastern Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://encompass.eku.edu/bio_fsresearch Part of the Plant Biology Commons Recommended Citation Ruhfel, Brad R., "Systematics and Biogeography of the Clusioid Clade (Malpighiales)" (2011). Biological Sciences Faculty and Staff Research. Paper 3. http://encompass.eku.edu/bio_fsresearch/3 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Faculty and Staff Research by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HARVARD UNIVERSITY Graduate School of Arts and Sciences DISSERTATION ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE The undersigned, appointed by the Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology have examined a dissertation entitled Systematics and biogeography of the clusioid clade (Malpighiales) presented by Brad R. Ruhfel candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and hereby certify that it is worthy of acceptance. Signature Typed name: Prof. Charles C. Davis Signature ( ^^^M^ *-^£<& Typed name: Profy^ndrew I^4*ooll Signature / / l^'^ i •*" Typed name: Signature Typed name Signature ^ft/V ^VC^L • Typed name: Prof. Peter Sfe^cnS* Date: 29 April 2011 Systematics and biogeography of the clusioid clade (Malpighiales) A dissertation presented by Brad R. Ruhfel to The Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Biology Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2011 UMI Number: 3462126 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Aquatic Plants: Morphoanatomical Adaptations - Edna Scremin-Dias
    TROPICAL BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT – Vol. I - Tropical Aquatic Plants: Morphoanatomical Adaptations - Edna Scremin-Dias TROPICAL AQUATIC PLANTS: MORPHOANATOMICAL ADAPTATIONS Edna Scremin-Dias Botany Laboratory, Biology Department, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil Keywords: Wetland plants, aquatic macrophytes, life forms, submerged plants, emergent plants, amphibian plants, aquatic plant anatomy, aquatic plant morphology, Pantanal. Contents 1. Introduction and definition 2. Origin, distribution and diversity of aquatic plants 3. Life forms of aquatic plants 3.1. Submerged Plants 3.2 Floating Plants 3.3 Emergent Plants 3.4 Amphibian Plants 4. Morphological and anatomical adaptations 5. Organs structure – Morphology and anatomy 5.1. Submerged Leaves: Structure and Adaptations 5.2. Floating Leaves: Structure and Adaptations 5.3. Emergent Leaves: Structure and Adaptations 5.4. Aeriferous Chambers: Characteristics and Function 5.5. Stem: Morphology and Anatomy 5.6. Root: Morphology and Anatomy 6. Economic importance 7. Importance to preserve wetland and wetlands plants Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary UNESCO – EOLSS Tropical ecosystems have a high diversity of environments, many of them with high seasonal influence. Tropical regions are richer in quantity and diversity of wetlands. Aquatic plants SAMPLEare widely distributed in theseCHAPTERS areas, represented by rivers, lakes, swamps, coastal lagoons, and others. These environments also occur in non tropical regions, but aquatic plant species diversity is lower than tropical regions. Colonization of bodies of water and wetland areas by aquatic plants was only possible due to the acquisition of certain evolutionary characteristics that enable them to live and reproduce in water. Aquatic plants have several habits, known as life forms that vary from emergent, floating-leaves, submerged free, submerged fixed, amphibian and epiphyte.
    [Show full text]
  • Evo-Devo and the Search for Homology
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com SCIENCE @DIRECT Theory in Bi0sciences ELSEVIER Theory in Biosciences 124 (2005) 213-241 www.elsevier.de/thbio Evo-devo and the search for homology ("sameness") in biological systems Rolf Rutishauser*, Philip Moline Institut fffr Systematische Botanik der Universitdt Zffrich, Zollikerstr. 107, CH-8008 Zffrich, Switzerland Received 14 May 2005; accepted 8 September 2005 Abstract Developmental biology and evolutionary studies have merged into evolutionary develop- mental biology ("evo-devo"). This synthesis already influenced and still continues to change the conceptual framework of structural biology. One of the cornerstones of structural biology is the concept of homology. But the search for homology ("sameness") of biological structures depends on our favourite perspectives (axioms, paradigms). Five levels of homology ("sameness") can be identified in the literature, although they overlap to some degree: (i) serial homology (homonomy) within modular organisms, (ii) historical homology (synapo- morphy), which is taken as the only acceptable homology by many biologists, (iii) underlying homology (i.e., parallelism) in closely related taxa, (iv) deep evolutionary homology due to the "same" master genes in distantly related phyla, and (v) molecular homology exclusively at gene level. The following essay gives emphasis on the heuristic advantages of seemingly opposing perspectives in structural biology, with examples mainly from comparative plant morphology. The organization of the plant body in the majority of angiosperms led to the recognition of the classical root-shoot model. In some lineages bauplan rules were transcended during evolution and development. This resulted in morphological misfits such as the Podostemaceae, peculiar eudicots adapted to submerged river rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Control of Aquatic Plants: a Best Management Practices Handbook
    July 2020 Dear Reader: Thank you for your interest in aquatic plant management. The Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Foundation (AERF) is pleased to bring you the fourth edition of Biology and Control of Aquatic Plants: A Best Management Practices Handbook. The mission of the AERF, a not for profit foundation, is to support research and development which provides strategies and techniques for the environmentally and scientifically sound management, conservation and restoration of aquatic ecosystems. One of the ways the Foundation accomplishes the mission is by providing information to the public on the benefits of conserving aquatic ecosystems. The handbook has been one of the most successful ways of distributing information to the public regarding aquatic plant management. The first, second and third editions of this handbook became some of the most widely read and used references in the aquatic plant management community. This fourth edition has been specifically designed with water resource managers, water management associations, homeowners and customers and operators of aquatic plant management companies and districts in mind. It is not intended to provide the answers to every question, but it should provide basic scientifically sound information to assist decision-makers. The authors, editors and contributors reflect the best the aquatic plant management industry has to offer. They gave generously of their time and talent in the production of this handbook and they deserve all the praise and thanks that can be garnered. Not only have they prepared the sections, they are available to all interested parties to provide clarification and additional information as warranted. These scientists, professors, aquatic plant managers and government officials have created a document that surely will be the most widely read and circulated handbook produced to date.
    [Show full text]